Long-term follow-up of achalasic patients treated with botulinum toxin

Botulinum toxin A (BoTx), a potent inhibitor of acetylcholine release from nerve endings both within the myenteric plexus and at the nerve-muscle junction, has been shown to decrease the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure in patients with achalasia. Because of this property, the esophageal injection of BoTx has been suggested as an alternative treatment in achalasia. The objective of this study was to determine the long-term efficacy and safety of intrasphincteric injection of BoTx in a group of achalasic patients. Nineteen patients (mean age 56.1 +/- 19.2 years) were enrolled in the study. All of them were injected endoscopically with 100 U of BoTx by sclerotherapy needle at different sites of the LES. Symptom score (dysphagia, regurgitation and chest pain, each on a 0-3 scale), esophageal manometer and esophageal radionuclide emptying were assessed before the treatment and at 4 weeks, 3 months and 1 year after BoTx injection. In case of failure or relapse (symptom score > 2), the treatment was repeated. All but five patients (74%) were in clinical remission at 1 month. Mean symptom score after 1 month of BoTx decreased from 7.1 +/- 0.9 to 2.2 +/- 2.5 (p < 0.05). LES pressure decreased from 38.4 +/- 13.7 to 27.4 +/- 13.5 mmHg (p < 0.05) and 10-min radionuclide retention decreased from 70.9 +/- 20.7% to 33.8 +/- 27.0% (p < 0.05). Side-effects (transient chest pain) were mild and infrequent. At 12 months, the clinical score was 0.9 +/- 0.5 (p < 0.05 vs. basal); mean LES pressure was 22.0 +/- 7.1 (p < 0.05 vs. basal) and 10-min radionuclide retention was 15.8 +/- 6.0% (p < 0.05 vs. basal). The efficacy of the first injection of BoTx lasted for a mean period of 9 months (range 2-14 months). At the time of writing (follow-up period mean 17.6 months, range 2-31), 14 patients (10 with one injection) were still in remission (74%). Our results showed that one or two intrasphincteric injections of BoTx resulted in clinical and objective improvement in about 74% of achalasic patients and are not associated with serious adverse effects; the efficacy of BoTx treatment was long lasting; this procedure could be considered an attractive treatment, especially in elderly patients who are poor candidates for more invasive procedures.     

Controlled trial of botulinum toxin injection versus placebo and pneumatic dilation in achalasia

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Intrasphincteric injection of botulinum toxin has been suggested as an alternative treatment modality in esophageal achalasia. A controlled trial comparing botulinum toxin, placebo, and pneumatic dilation is reported. METHODS: Sixteen patients received random intrasphincteric injections of either botulinum toxin or saline. The efficacy of treatment was assessed by symptom score, esophageal manometry, and scintigraphy. In case of failure, pneumatic dilation was performed. RESULTS: One month after injection, symptoms had improved in all patients treated with botulinum toxin (symptom score, 0.9 +/- 0.6 vs. 5.5 +/- 1.4; P < 0.02). In the placebo group, symptoms were unchanged in all patients, who were all dilated. Lower esophageal sphincter pressure decreased by 49% after treatment with botulinum toxin (P < 0.03) and by 72% after dilation (P < 0.01). Similarly, esophageal retention decreased by 47% after treatment with botulinum toxin (P < 0.02) and by 59% after dilation (P < 0.02). No significant difference in symptom score and esophageal function test results was found between patients treated with botulinum toxin injections and those undergoing dilation. However, 7 of the 8 patients in the botulinum toxin group required a second injection because of recurrent dysphagia. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of achalasia with botulinum toxin was as effective as pneumatic dilation in relieving symptoms and improving esophageal function. The effect of the first injection was temporary, but the effect of the second injection lasted longer. (Gastroenterology 1996 Dec;111(6):1418-24)     

贲门失弛缓症内镜下注射肉毒毒素与气囊扩张术疗效比较的系统评价

目的 系统评价内镜下注射肉毒毒素与气囊扩张治疗贲门失弛缓症的有效性和安全性.方法 应用国际Cochrane协作网系统评价方法进行评价.结果 共纳人12个试验包括559例患者.Meta分析显示:(1)短期总有效率内镜下气囊扩张治疗优于内镜下注射肉毒毒素治疗(83.21%比71.27%,P<0.01).(2)长期总有效率内镜下气囊扩张治疗优于内镜下注射肉毒毒素治疗(54.59%比27.60%,P<0.01).(3)临床复发率内镜下注射肉毒毒素治疗高于内镜下气囊扩张治疗(55.66%比18.84%,P<0.01).(4)副作用及并发症发生率内镜下气囊扩张治疗高于内镜下注射肉毒毒素治疗(13.01%比1.35%,P<0.01).结论 目前的证据表明:内镜下注射肉毒毒素与气囊扩张均有较好的短期疗效和安全性,内镜下气囊扩张治疗在长期疗效上更优于内镜下注射肉毒毒素.     

Timed barium oesophagram: better predictor of long term success after pneumatic dilation in achalasia than symptom assessment

BACKGROUND: Symptom relief post pneumatic dilation is traditionally used to assess treatment success in achalasia patients. Recently, we showed that symptom relief and objective oesophageal emptying are concordant in about 70% of patients, while up to 30% of achalasia patients report near complete symptom relief despite poor oesophageal emptying of barium. AIMS: We now report the results of long term clinical follow up in these two groups of achalasia patients, assessing differences in symptomatic remission rates. METHODS: Achalasia patients undergoing pneumatic dilation since 1995 were evaluated both symptomatically and objectively at regular intervals. Pre and post dilation symptoms were recorded. Barium column height was measured five minutes after ingesting a fixed volume of barium per patient to assess oesophageal emptying. Patients who initially reported near complete symptom relief were divided into two groups based on objective findings on barium study: (1) complete oesophageal emptying (concordant group), and (2) poor oesophageal emptying (discordant group). Patients were followed prospectively for symptom recurrence. RESULTS: Thirty four patients with complete symptom relief post pneumatic dilation were identified. In 22/34 (65%) patients, the degree of symptom and barium height improvements was similar (concordant group). In 10/34 (30%) patients, there was < 50% improvement in barium height (discordant group). Significantly (p<0.001) more discordant (9/10; 90%) than concordant (2/22; 9%) patients failed therapy at the one year follow up. Seventeen of 22 (77%) concordant patients were still in remission while all discordant patients had failed therapy by six years of follow up. Length of time in symptom remission (mean (SEM)) post pneumatic dilation was significantly (p=0.001) less for the discordant group (18.0 (3.6) months) compared with the concordant group (59.0 (4.8) months). CONCLUSIONS: (1) Poor oesophageal emptying is present in nearly 30% of achalasia patients reporting complete symptom relief post pneumatic dilation. (2) The majority (90%) of these patients will fail within one year of treatment. (3) Timed barium oesophagram is an important tool in the objective evaluation of achalasia patients post pneumatic dilation.     

Botulinum toxin versus pneumatic dilatation in the treatment of achalasia: a randomised trial

Background—Intrasphinctericinjection of botulinum toxin is a new treatment option for achalasia.
Aims—To compare the immediate andlong term efficacy of botulinum toxin with that of pneumatic dilatation.
Methods—Symptomatic patients withachalasia were randomised to botulinum toxin (22 patients, median age57 years) or pneumatic dilatation (20 patients, median age 56 years).Symptom scores were assessed initially, and at one, three, six, nine,and 12months after treatment. Objective assessment includedoesophageal manometry initially and at one month, and bariumoesophagram initially and at one, six, and 12 months post-treatment.
Results—Pneumatic dilatationresulted in a significantly (p=0.02) higher cumulative remission rate.At 12 months, 14/20 (70%) pneumatic dilatation and 7/22 (32%)botulinum toxin treated patients were in symptomatic remission(p=0.017). Failure rates were similar initially, but failure over timewas significantly (p=0.01) higher after botulinum toxin (50%) thanpneumatic dilatation (7%). Pneumatic dilatation resulted insignificant (p<0.001) reduction in symptom scores, and loweroesophageal sphincter pressure, oesophageal barium column height, andoesophageal diameter. Botulinum toxin produced significant reduction insymptom scores (p<0.001), but no reduction in objective parameters.
Conclusions—At one year pneumaticdilatation is more effective than botulinum toxin. Symptom improvementparallels objective oesophageal measurements after pneumatic dilatationbut not after botulinum toxin treatment for achalasia.

Keywords:achalasia; pneumatic dilatation; botulinum toxin; barium oesophagram

     

Manometrically-guided endoscopic injection of botulinum toxin for esophageal achalasia: a pilot trial

AIMS: Some patients gained only short-term response (< 6 months) after botulinum toxin (BTX) injection for achalasia. This may be due to an incorrect site of injection when targeting the lower esophageal sphincter by using endoscopic landmarks only. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 7 elderly patients (4 females, 67 +/- 20 years) with classical achalasia received manometrically-guided botulinum toxin injection by means of a double-channel endoscope. Thereafter, they were clinically re-evaluated at 6 weeks and later on at bi-monthly intervals. RESULTS: The mean symptom score decreased 6 weeks after the manometrically-guided BTX-treatment from 12 +/- 2 (before BTX) to 6 +/- 2 points (p = 0.02). However, according to the study criteria one patient did not respond to BTX-injection and underwent subsequent cardiomyotomy. The LES-resting pressure was found not to be altered in this patient (6 weeks after BTX-injection) but manometry revealed a marked decrease of the LES-tone in 3 other patients who benefitted from BTX-injection. 5 of the 6 patients, who initially benefited from BTX-injection, relapsed 10 months (range, 6-13 months) after their initial BTX-treatment. They all were treated with repeated BTX-injections. At completion of the study (1.5-year follow-up) the mean symptom score of the 6 patients was still significantly lower (6 +/- 2 points) than before study entry (p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Manometrically-guided endoscopic BTX-injection is a simple, safe and highly effective (during 1.5-year follow-up) technique for treatment of esophageal achalasia. With the manometrically-guided injection technique one may obtain a longer lasting symptomatic response than with the traditional method of BTX-application.     

Treatment of achalasia: the short-term response to botulinum toxin injection seems to be independent of any kind of pretreatment

Background  

It has been suggested that intrasphincteric injection of botulinum toxin (BTX) may represent an alternative therapy to balloon dilatation in achalasia. The aim of the present study was to test the effectiveness of botulinum toxin injections in achalasia patients, as assessed using lower oesophageal sphincter pressure (LOSP) and symptom scores, and to compare the response in patients with different types of pretreatment (no previous treatment, balloon dilatation, myotomy, BTX injection).     

Botulinum toxin for achalasia in children

BACKGROUND: Injection of botulinum toxin (BTx) into the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) of adult patients with achalasia results in the effective relief of symptoms. The aim of the present study was to examine the effectiveness of BTx in pediatric patients suffering from achalasia. METHODS: Seven patients suffering from achalasia with or without prior treatment were treated with intrasphincteric injection of BTx. The median duration of follow up was 15 months. RESULTS: All seven patients improved. The median interval before recurrence of symptoms was 4 months (range 1-14 months). There was an inverse relationship between the pretreatment LES pressure and the duration of response (r=-0.6). The mean pretreatment LES pressure in the subgroup with a response greater than 6 months was 38+/-10 mmHg compared with 61+/-12 mmHg in the other four patients (P= 0.05). All seven patients required retreatment. CONCLUSION: Botulinum toxin is effective in relieving symptoms in pediatric patients suffering from achalasia, producing a sustained response beyond 6 months in 43% of patients.     

Achalasia: outcome of patients treated with intrasphincteric injection of botulinum toxin.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the safety and clinical efficacy of botulinum toxin (BT) in patients with achalasia followed up for six months. METHODS: Fifty five symptomatic patients with manometrically proven achalasia were included in a multicentre prospective trial. Before and two weeks and two months after intrasphincteric injection of BT, symptoms of dysphagia, regurgitation, and chest pain were scored on a 0-3 scale, and lower oesophageal sphincter pressure (LOSP) was assessed. The symptom score was determined again at six months, clinical improvement being defined by < or = 3, relapse by > 3, and failure as a relapse after two injections or loss to follow up. RESULTS: Except for transient chest or epigastric pain (22%), no side effects were observed. There was a significant decrease in LOSP after treatment. Symptom scores were significantly improved at two weeks (2.0 (SD 1.6)), two months (1.7 (1.8)), and six months (1.9 (2.0)) compared with pretreatment values (5.1 (1.8), p < 0.001). At six months, 33 patients had clinical improvement (27 after one injection), 17 were considered failures, and five had just relapsed. Although there was a trend for age (older patients being more responsive), age, sex, prior duration of symptoms, initial symptom score, weight loss, LOSP, magnitude of oesophageal contractions, vigorous or non-vigorous achalasia, previous dilatations, and radiological features were not predictive of results. CONCLUSIONS: This multicentre series confirms that intrasphincteric injection of BT is a safe procedure, resulting in clinical improvement in 60% of patients with achalasia at six months. The therapeutic role of BT in achalasia needs further evaluation with regard to other alternatives.     

Treatment of idiopathic gastroparesis with injection of botulinum toxin into the pyloric sphincter muscle

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to determine if botulinum toxin injection into the pyloric sphincter improves gastric emptying and reduces symptoms in patients with idiopathic gastroparesis. METHODS: Patients with idiopathic gastroparesis not responding to prokinetic therapy underwent botulinum toxin (80-100 U, 20 U/ml) injection into the pyloric sphincter. Gastric emptying scintigraphy was performed before and 4 wk after treatment. Total symptom scores were obtained from the sum of eight upper GI symptoms graded on a scale from 0 (none) to 4 (extreme). RESULTS: Ten patients were entered into the study. The mean percentage of solid gastric retention at 4 h improved from 27+/-6% (normal < 10%) before botulinum toxin injection into the pylorus to 14+/-4% (p = 0.038) 4 wk after treatment. The symptom score decreased from 15.3+/-1.7 at baseline to 9.0+/-1.9 (p = 0.006) at 4 wk, a 38+/-9% decrease. Improvement in symptoms tended to correlate with improved gastric emptying of solids (r = 0.565, p 0.086). CONCLUSIONS: This initial pilot study suggests that botulinum toxin injection into the pylorus in patients with idiopathic gastroparesis improves both gastric emptying and symptoms.     

Treatment of chest pain in patients with noncardiac,nonreflux, nonachalasia spastic esophageal motor disorders using botulinum toxin injection into the gastroesophageal junction

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine if botulinum toxin injection in the gastroesophageal junction improves symptoms in patients with noncardiac chest pain with a spastic esophageal motility disorder. METHODS: Twenty-nine noncardiac chest pain patients with nonachalasia, nonreflux-related spastic esophageal motility disorders were enrolled in this open label trial of botulinum toxin injection at the gastroesophageal junction. Chest pain was the major complaint in all patients. Symptoms of chest pain, dysphagia, regurgitation, and heartburn were scored before and 1 month after botulinum toxin injection. A response to botulinum toxin was defined as at least a 50% reduction in the symptom score with a possible total chest pain score of 4. The duration of response was defined as the time period, between the time of injection and the point in time, at which the severity of the symptoms returned to the preinjection score. RESULTS: Seventy-two percent of the patients responded with at least 50% reduction in chest pain. In these responders, there was a 79% reduction in the mean chest pain score from a preinjection score of 3.7 to a postinjection score of 0.78 (p < 0.0001). The mean duration of the response for chest pain in these patients was 7.3+/-4.1 months (range 1-18 months). There was also a significant reduction in the mean regurgitation score, dysphagia score, and total symptom score (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Botulinum toxin injection at the gastroesophageal junction leads to significant symptomatic improvement in patients with spastic esophageal motility disorders whose major complaint is chest pain.     

Achalasia treatment in the elderly: is botulinum toxin injection the best option?

BACKGROUND : Achalasia treatment in elderly patients is a matter of controversy. Botulinum toxin injection has been proposed as the best option in this group of patients as it is a safe procedure. However, concern persists regarding its short-term effect. AIMS : To analyse the clinical and economic effectiveness of botulinum toxin injection in the treatment of achalasia patients who are elderly. METHODS : Seventeen consecutive achalasia patients older than 65 years were treated with 80 units of botulinum toxin. Clinical follow-up at 1, 6 and 12 months was performed. Control manometry when symptoms recurred was carried out. Results were compared with those of an historical control group of 16 achalasia patients also older than 65 years and who had been treated with endoscopic dilation. The costs of both procedures were compared. RESULTS : Twenty-nine botulinum toxin injections were performed in the 17 patients of the botulinum toxin group (follow-up, 12-36 months). In the dilation group only two patients had to be retreated (follow-up, 12-108 months). No major complications were observed in either group. The average duration of symptom alleviation was 48 +/- 33 months for endoscopic dilation and 13.8 +/- 9.5 months for botulinum toxin injection. Maintaining a patient free of symptoms cost E348.31 per year for botulinum toxin injection, whilst if endoscopic dilation was chosen the cost was only E117.47 per year. CONCLUSIONS : The effect of botulinum toxin injections wanes with time in elderly patients, necessitating repeated injections to keep the patients symptom-free. Due to the required repeated injections this procedure is more expensive than endoscopic dilation.     

Use of botulinum toxin as a diagnostic/therapeutic trial to help clarify an indication for definitive therapy in patients with achalasia

OBJECTIVE: Intrasphincteric injection of botulinum toxin is useful in achalasia but is limited by its short term efficacy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of botulinum toxin in selected patients in whom its short duration of action may be useful in guiding therapy before considering more invasive procedures that might not be indicated. METHODS: Over a 3 yr period, botulinum toxin was injected into the lower esophageal sphincter in patients with: 1) symptoms consistent with achalasia but insufficient manometric criteria to make the diagnosis; 2) complex clinical situations in which there were factors in addition to achalasia that may be contributing to the patient's symptoms and that required different treatment; 3) atypical manifestations of achalasia; 4) advanced achalasia in which it was unclear that sphincter-directed therapy (vs esophagectomy) would be of benefit; and 5) after Heller myotomy. Clinical response was assessed mostly by symptom improvement, but in some patients follow-up barium swallow or radioscintigraphy was available. RESULTS: Eleven patients were identified. Ten had complete symptomatic response to the injection. Two patients have undergone subsequent successful pneumatic dilation, one a successful laparoscopic myotomy, and another currently scheduled for surgical myotomy. The only patient without response had advanced achalasia requiring esophagectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Intrasphincteric injection of botulinum toxin into the lower esophageal sphincter is a useful and safe means of guiding therapy in those patients with a variant of achalasia, atypical achalasia, or complex achalasia in which it is unclear that more invasive procedures such as pneumatic dilation or surgical myotomy are the correct therapy.     

A multicentre randomised study of intrasphincteric botulinum toxin in patients with oesophageal achalasia. GISMAD Achalasia Study Group

BACKGROUND: Intrasphincteric injection of botulinum toxin (Botx) has been proposed as treatment for oesophageal achalasia. However, the predictors of response and optimal dose remain unclear. AIMS: To compare the effect of different doses of Botx and to identify predictors of response. PATIENTS/METHODS: A total of 118 achalasic patients were randomised to receive one of three doses of Botx in a single injection: 50 U (n=40), 100 U (n=38), and 200 U (n=40). Of those who received 100 U, responsive patients were reinjected with an identical dose after 30 days. Clinical and manometric assessments were performed at baseline, 30 days after the initial injection of botulinum toxin, and at the end of follow up (mean 12 months; range 7-24 months). RESULTS: Thirty days after the initial injection, 82% of patients were considered responders without a clear dose related effect. At the end of follow up however, relapse of symptoms was evident in 19% of patients who received two injections of 100 U compared with 47% and 43% in the 50 U and 200 U groups, respectively. Using Kaplan-Meier analysis, patients in the 100x2 U group were more likely to remain in remission at any time (p<0.04), with 68% (95% CI 59-83) still in remission at 24 months. In a multiple adjusted model, response to Botx was independently predicted by the occurrence of vigorous achalasia (odds ratio 3.3) and the 100x2 U regimen (odds ratio 3.2). CONCLUSIONS: Two injections of 100 U of Botx 30 days apart appeared to be the most effective therapeutic schedule. The presence of vigorous achalasia was the principal determinant of the response to Botx.     

Short- and medium-term clinical efficacy of three endoscopic therapies for achalasia: a single-blinded prospective study.

OBJECTIVE: to compare the efficacy of three endoscopic therapies for achalasia and to identify predictors of response. DESIGN: prospective, single-blinded study at short and medium term. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 22 patients (9M/13 F; mean age: 47.45 +/- 21.01 years) with confirmed clinical and manometric achalasia were randomised in three groups: intrasphincteric injections of botulinum toxin (group 1: 10 patients ), injections of 1% polidocanol (group 2:6 patients), and a combined therapy with both of them (group 3: 6 patients). Clinical response was evaluated by a score (0-5) of tested symptoms (dysphagia, regurgitation and chest pain) at 1 and 24 weeks post-treatment. RESULTS: at 24 weeks post-treatment group 2 had the best complete response (CR) rate (33.33%), whereas CR in both the botulinum toxin and combined therapy groups was 10 and 0%, respectively. Groups 1 and 2 got an overall improvement in clinical score at 1 (p= 0.02) and 24 weeks (p= 0.04). Five patients (50%) in group 1, two patients (33.33%) in group 2, and three patients (50%) in group 3 needed other therapies (dilation or surgery) because of treatment failure. Separately, neither age nor sex, time from diagnosis or type of therapy could distinguish responders from non-responders in these three groups. However, absence of response within the first week, and an initial clinical score above 7 were predictive factors of poor response at six months. CONCLUSIONS: short- and medium-term clinical response to these endoscopic therapies was limited. The absence of response at seven days and a severe initial clinical score were predictive factors of poor medium-term response.     

Current trends in the management of achalasia

Despite the recent advances in the understanding of the pathophysiology of achalasia, aetiology remains obscure and this primary oesophageal motor disorder is still considered "idiopathic" in nature. As a consequence, the therapeutic approach remains palliative. Since there is little or no chance of improving the motor abnormalities of the oesophageal body, treatment of achalasia is aimed at symptomatic relief of functional lower oesophageal sphincter obstruction. Pharmacologic treatment induces only a limited and brief improvement. It may be used to treat early cases of achalasia without significant oesophageal dilatation and to manage patients exhibiting some but not all the characteristics of achalasia (e.g. transitional forms). In any event, drug therapy should be seen as a short-term measure and be considered as an alternative only in patients unfit to undergo pneumatic dilatation or surgery. Pneumatic dilatation and surgical myotomy (now increasingly carried out through a minimally invasive approach) remain, therefore, the two main approaches which guarantee long-lasting symptomatic relief. Unfortunately, both pneumatic dilatation and Heller cardiomyotomy are only palliative as neither reliably reverses oesophageal aperistalsis not corrects the incomplete postdeglutition relaxation of the lower oesophageal sphincter. They do, however, improve symptoms by lowering lower oesophageal sphincter pressure thus enhancing oesophageal emptying by gravity. Recently a third approach, consisting in perendoscopic injection of botulinum toxin into the lower oesophageal sphincter is gaining acceptance. Indeed, more endoscopists are finding this kind of treatment attractive because it does not carry the risk of perforation that can occur with pneumatic dilatation. However, since symptomatic improvement with botulinum toxin only lasts a few months, either repeated injections are required or the patient must be switched to other therapy. There may be, however, subsets of patients for whom BoTox injection is the preferred approach. They probably include elderly patients or patients with multiple medical problems who are poor candidates for more invasive procedures as well as those unwilling to have either surgery or pneumatic dilatation. Future approaches to achalasia may markedly change from the suggested algorithm depending on the long-term efficacy and safety as well as cost analysis of BoTox injection and of minimally invasive surgery.     

Heartburn in patients with achalasia.

Heartburn, the main symptom of gastrooesophageal reflux disease (GORD), might be expected to occur infrequently in achalasia, a disorder characterised by a hypertensive lower oesophageal sphincter (LOS) that fails to relax. Nevertheless, it is often described by patients with achalasia. The medical records of 32 patients with untreated achalasia who complained of heartburn, and of 35 similar patients who denied the symptom, were reviewed to explore the implications of heartburn in this condition. Data on endoscopic and manometric findings, and on the onset and duration of oesophageal symptoms were collected. Three patterns of heartburn were observed: (1) in 8 patients (25%) the onset of heartburn followed the onset of dysphagia, (2) in 15 patients (47%) heartburn preceded the onset of dysphagia and persisted as dysphagia progressed, and (3) in 9 patients (28%), heartburn preceded the onset of dysphagia and stopped as dysphagia progressed. The mean (SD) basal LOS pressure in the patients with heartburn (38 (16) mm Hg) was significantly lower than that in patients without the symptom (52 (26) mm Hg); the lowest LOS pressure (29 (11) mm Hg) was observed in the subset of patients whose heartburn preceded the onset of dysphagia and then stopped. It is concluded that patients who have achalasia with heartburn have lower basal LOS pressures than patients who have achalasia without this symptom. In some patients with achalasia, the appearance of dysphagia is heralded by the disappearance of longstanding heartburn. For these patients, it is speculated that achalasia develops in the setting of underlying GORD.     

Intrasphincteric botulinum toxin versus pneumatic dilatation for achalasia: a cost minimization analysis.

BACKGROUND: Pneumatic dilatation or intrasphincteric botulinum toxin injection provide effective symptom relief for patients with achalasia. Although intrasphincteric botulinum toxin injection is simple and safe, its efficacy may be short-lived. Pneumatic dilatation lasts longer, but esophageal perforation is a risk. We compared treatment costs for pneumatic dilatation and intrasphincteric botulinum toxin injection using a decision analysis model to determine whether the practical advantages of intrasphincteric botulinum toxin injection outweigh the economic impact of the need for frequent re-treatment. METHODS: Probability estimates for intrasphincteric botulinum toxin injection were derived from published reports. Probability estimates for the pneumatic dilatation strategy were obtained by retrospective review of our 10-year experience using the Rigiflex dilator. Direct, "third-party payer" costs were determined in Canadian dollars. RESULTS: Intrasphincteric botulinum toxin injection was significantly more costly at $5033 compared with $3608 for the pneumatic dilatation strategy, yielding an incremental cost of $1425 over the 10-year period considered. Sensitivity analysis showed that pneumatic dilatation is less expensive across all probable ranges of costs and probability estimates. The intrasphincteric botulinum toxin injection strategy is less costly if life-expectancy is less than 2 years. CONCLUSIONS: Intrasphincteric botulinum toxin injection is more costly than pneumatic dilatation for the treatment of achalasia. The added expense of frequent re-treatment with intrasphincteric botulinum toxin injection outweighs the potential economic benefits of the safety of the procedure, unless life-expectancy is 2 years or less.     

Recent trends in endoscopic management of achalasia

Esophageal achalasia is a chronic and progressive motility disorder characterized by absence of esophageal body peristalsis associated with an impaired relaxation of lower esophageal sphincter(LES) and usually with an elevated LES pressure, leading to an altered passage of bolus through the esophago-gastric junction. A definitive cure for achalasia is currently unavailable. Palliative treatment options provide only food and liquid bolus intake and relief of symptoms. Endoscopic therapy for achalasia aims to disrupt or weaken the lower esophageal sphincter. Intra-sphincteric injection of botulinum toxin is reserved for elderly or severely ill patients. Pneumatic dilation provides superior results than botulinum toxin injection and a similar mediumterm efficacy almost comparable to that attained after surgery. Per oral endoscopic myotomy is a promising option for treating achalasia, but it requires increased experience and further objective and long-term follow up. This article will review different endoscopic treatments in achalasia, and summarize the short-term and long-term outcomes.     

Expandable metal stents in achalasia--is there a role?

OBJECTIVE: Achalasia is treated with pneumatic dilation or myotomy, and botulinum toxin injections are occasionally used. We review our community's experience with expandable metal stents in six patients who failed medical treatment or were poor surgical candidates. METHODS: Eight stents were placed in six patients between July 1995 and November 1997. Four patients had achalasia and two pseudoachalasia. Four patients underwent successive botulinum toxin injections. One patient only agreed to periodic Maloney dilatations or a stent. Pneumatic dilation was performed in one patient and considered high risk in the rest. All were poor surgical candidates. Three different stents were used: Gianturco Rosch Z stent, Wallstent I, and Wallstent II. RESULTS: One-month mortality and morbidity were 33% and 50%, respectively. Two patients were asymptomatic on a liquid diet for > or =6 months but required repeat endoscopy for recurrent dysphagia because of food bolus impaction and proximal stent migration in each. CONCLUSIONS: Expandable metal stents in achalasia or pseudoachalasia do not provide sustained symptom relief, and their use is associated with unacceptably high morbidity and mortality. We do not recommend the use of these devices in patients who have failed medical therapy or who are poor surgical candidates.