共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 0 毫秒
1.
Secondary abdominal compartment syndrome is an elusive early complication of traumatic shock resuscitation 总被引:8,自引:0,他引:8
Balogh Z McKinley BA Cocanour CS Kozar RA Holcomb JB Ware DN Moore FA 《American journal of surgery》2002,184(6):538-43; discussion 543-4
BACKGROUND: The term secondary abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) has been applied to describe trauma patients who develop ACS but do not have abdominal injuries. The purpose of this study was to describe major trauma victims who developed secondary ACS during standardized shock resuscitation. METHODS: Our prospective database for standardized shock resuscitation was reviewed to obtain before and after abdominal decompression shock related data for secondary ACS patients. Focused chart review was done to confirm time-related outcomes. RESULTS: Over the 30 months period ending May 2001, 11 (9%) of 128 standardized shock resuscitation patients developed secondary ACS. All presented in severe shock (systolic blood pressure 85 +/- 5 mm Hg, base deficit 8.6 +/- 1.6 mEq/L), with severe injuries (injury severity score 28 +/- 3) and required aggressive shock resuscitation (26 +/- 2 units of blood, 38 +/- 3 L crystalloid within 24 hours). All cases of secondary ACS were recognized and decompressed within 24 hours of hospital admission. After decompression, the bladder pressure and the systemic vascular resistance decreased, while the mean arterial pressure, cardiac index, and static lung compliance increased. The mortality rate was 54%. Those who died failed to respond to decompression with increased cardiac index and did not maintain decreased bladder pressure. CONCLUSIONS: Secondary ACS is an early but, if appropriately monitored, recognizable complication in patients with major nonabdominal trauma who require aggressive resuscitation. 相似文献
2.
Ball CG Kirkpatrick AW Yilmaz S Monroy M Nicolaou S Salazar A 《American journal of surgery》2006,191(5):619-624
PURPOSE: Renal allograft compartment syndrome (RACS) is early graft dysfunction secondary to retroperitoneal hypertension and resultant ischemia. Our purpose was to identify the incidence, therapies and outcomes of patients with RACS. METHODS: All patients who underwent a renal transplant between 2000 and 2005 were reviewed. Patients with signs of acute allograft dysfunction were identified. RACS was diagnosed via visual allograft hypoperfusion and/or with preoperative Doppler ultrasound. RESULTS: Among 458 patients, 11 (2%) were diagnosed with RACS. Characteristics between patient groups were similar. Five (45%) patients displayed adequate initial allograft function after transplantation. Doppler ultrasound was diagnostic. Six (55%) patients displayed poor initial allograft function and were classified as early presenters of RACS. Allograft function improved dramatically upon decompression. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians must remain aware of RACS as a potential diagnosis when patients display rapid deterioration in kidney performance after good initial allograft function. Doppler ultrasound is useful in diagnosing late presenters. 相似文献
3.
Bowling WM 《The Journal of trauma》2003,55(5):1004; author reply 1004-1004; author reply 1005
4.
Secondary abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS), defined as intra-abdominal hypertension with associated pulmonary, renal, or hemodynamic compromise in the absence of preceding abdominal operation or injury, can markedly increase surgical morbidity and mortality. We performed a retrospective chart review of the physiologic parameters and outcomes of 10 patients with secondary ACS. Ten patients developed secondary ACS after aggressive resuscitation, at an average of 20.2 hours. Four of the patients sustained burns greater than 40 per cent, three of the patients had penetrating extremity trauma, one patient had blunt abdominal trauma, one patient was struck by lightning, and one patient developed a retroperitoneal bleed while on heparin. The average bladder pressure was 40.6. The average volume given in the first 24 hours was 33,001 cc (range, 12,400 to 69,000). The average base deficit at admission was -12 (range, +1 to -25). Seven of the 10 patients had decreased urine output. Nine of the 10 patients had decreased tidal volumes on pressure control ventilation. All 10 patients were hypotensive, with 7 of the 10 requiring vasopressors. Overall mortality was 60 per cent, with 43 per cent mortality for those decompressed. Prompt recognition and treatment are mandatory for survival of ACS. We recommend routine bladder pressure monitoring for patients with ongoing resuscitation greater than 500 cc/hr. 相似文献
5.
Biffl WL Moore EE Burch JM Offner PJ Franciose RJ Johnson JL 《American journal of surgery》2001,182(6):645-648
BACKGROUND: Recent reports have described resuscitation-induced, "secondary" abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) in trauma patients without intra-abdominal injuries. We have diagnosed secondary ACS in a variety of nontrauma as well as trauma patients. The purpose of this review is to characterize patients who develop secondary ACS. METHODS: Our prospective ACS database was reviewed for cases of secondary ACS. Physiologic parameters and outcomes were recorded. Data are expressed as mean +/- SEM. RESULTS: Fourteen patients (13 male, aged 45 +/- 5 years) developed ACS 11.6 +/- 2.2 hours following resuscitation from shock. Eleven (79%) had required vasopressors; the worst base deficit was 14.1 +/- 1.9. Resuscitation included 16.7 +/- 3.0 L crystalloid and 13.3 +/- 2.9 red blood cell units. Decompressive laparotomy improved intra-abdominal, systolic, and peak airway pressures, as well as urine output; however, mortality was 38% among trauma and 100% among nontrauma patients. CONCLUSIONS: Secondary ACS may be encountered by general surgeons in a variety of clinical scenarios; resuscitation from severe shock appears to be the critical factor. Early identification and abdominal decompression are essential. Unfortunately, in our experience, this is a highly lethal event. 相似文献
6.
Post-injury abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) is an increasingly recognised phenomenon in critical care. During the last decade, ACS had also been characterised in patients without abdominal injuries, referred to as secondary ACS. Recent investigation has described this elusive syndrome better, with up to 70% mortality. Regardless of the cause of the syndrome and the nature of any extra-abdominal injuries, secondary ACS is invariably associated with massive fluid resuscitation. With a reliable, predictive model and new monitoring techniques, trauma clinicians should be able to identify the high-risk patient and attenuate the impact of this syndrome. 相似文献
7.
Struck MF Illert T Schmidt T Reichelt B Steen M 《Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries》2012,38(4):562-567
Introduction
Secondary abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) is a severe complication in patients admitted to burn intensive care units (BICUs). Unlike patients with thermal burns, patients with toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) present with a different pathophysiology and usually require less fluid.Patients and methods
We reviewed our registry of adult patients presenting with TEN in our 8-bed BICU over the course of 11 years and identified and analyzed patients treated for ACS and decompressive laparotomy (DL).Results
From a total of 29 patients with bioptic confirmed TEN, 5 underwent DL due to ACS with a mean age of 57 years, mean percentage of total body surface area (TBSA) affected of 54 ± 25%, complete epidermolysis of 28 ± 24% TBSA, a mean severity of illness score (SCORTEN) of 3.8 ± 0.8, and a mean intra-abdominal pressure before DL of 33 ± 7 mmHg. Mortality was 100% in patients with ACS versus 33% without ACS.Conclusion
An ACS that requires DL worsens the already critical condition of a TEN patient considerably. TEN-related impaired intestinal functionality and increasing intestinal edema due to systemic capillary leakage warrant early initiation of intra-abdominal pressure monitoring to identify patients at high risk of ACS. 相似文献8.
目的:总结严重创伤后并发腹腔间室综合征(abdominal compartment syndrome,ACS)的诊治经验。方法:回顾分析近两年半时间内严重创伤后并发ACS病人的临床资料,10例行开腹减压者入组;1例为电击伤致腹壁裂开、腹腔脏器外露,腹壁裂口处组织呈焦痂、挛缩状态,外露小肠肿胀明显,还纳后强行关腹势必会形成腹腔内高压状态,因此亦行腹腔临时关闭,故入组一并讨论。结果:11例均行腹腔开放减压,1例术后死于酸中毒、多脏器功能衰竭,其余病人二期行关腹或皮瓣移植术后出院。结论:腹部严重创伤合并ACS的病人伤情危重、复杂,早期诊断和及时的开腹减压是抢救的关键,遵循损伤控制原则和给予合理的营养支持治疗是改善预后的重要措施。 相似文献
9.
Prospective evaluation of vacuum-assisted closure in abdominal compartment syndrome and severe abdominal sepsis 总被引:3,自引:0,他引:3
Perez D Wildi S Demartines N Bramkamp M Koehler C Clavien PA 《Journal of the American College of Surgeons》2007,205(4):586-592
BACKGROUND: Open abdomen treatment because of severe abdominal sepsis and abdominal compartment syndrome remains a difficult task. Different surgical techniques are available and are often used according to the surgeon's personal experience. Recently, the abdominal vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) system has been introduced, providing a new possibility to treat an open abdomen. In this study, we evaluate the role of this treatment option. STUDY DESIGN: This prospective observational cohort study includes 37 consecutive patients who were temporarily treated with VAC for severe abdominal sepsis or abdominal compartment syndrome, or both. Patients with abdominal trauma were excluded from the study. Thirty-seven patients undergoing major elective laparotomy and primary abdominal closure served as control group. Primary end points were fascial closure rate, physicoemotional recovery, and appearance outcomes 1 year after closure. Secondary end points included mortality, duration of open abdomen, length of ICU stay, and hospitalization time. RESULTS: Abdomens were left open for 23 days (range 3 to 122 days) with 3.8 dressing changes (range 1 to 22) per patient. Abdominal closure was achieved in 70% (n = 26), with no marked relation to duration of open abdomen treatment (p > 0.05). After 3 months, patients with VAC treatment recovered to a physical and mental health status similar to patients in the control group (p > 0.05). This status remained stable until the end of the study. Aesthetic outcomes (according to the Vancouver Scar Scale) were considerably poorer in the VAC group compared with controls (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of laparostomy with VAC for abdominal sepsis and abdominal compartment syndrome results in a high rate of successful abdominal closure. In addition, patients recover more rapidly, although hypertrophic scars might interfere with body perception. We recommend abdominal VAC system as first option if open abdomen treatment is indicated. 相似文献
10.
F. I. B. Macedo J. D. Sciarretta C. A. Otero G. Ruiz D. J. Ebler L. R. Pizano N. Namias 《European journal of trauma and emergency surgery》2016,42(2):207-211
Introduction
Secondary abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) can occur in trauma patients without abdominal injuries. Surgical management of patients presenting with secondary ACS after isolated traumatic lower extremity vascular injury (LEVI) continues to evolve, and associated outcomes remain unknown.Methods
From January 2006 to September 2011, 191 adult trauma patients presented to the Ryder Trauma Center, an urban level I trauma center in Miami, Florida with traumatic LEVIs. Among them 10 (5.2 %) patients were diagnosed with secondary ACS. Variables collected included age, gender, mechanism of injury, and clinical status at presentation. Surgical data included vessel injury, technical aspects of repair, associated complications, and outcomes.Results
Mean age was 37.4 ± 18.0 years (range 16–66 years), and the majority of patients were males (8 patients, 80 %). There were 7 (70 %) penetrating injuries (5 gunshot wounds and 2 stab wounds), and 3 blunt injuries with mean Injury Severity Score (ISS) 21.9 ± 14.3 (range 9–50). Surgical management of LEVIs included ligation (4 patients, 40 %), primary repair (1 patient, 10 %), reverse saphenous vein graft (2 patients, 20 %), and PTFE interposition grafting (3 patients, 30 %). The overall mortality rate in this series was 60 %.Conclusions
The association between secondary ACS and lower extremity vascular injuries carries high morbidity and mortality rates. Further research efforts should focus at identifying parameters to accurately determine resuscitation goals, and therefore, prevent such a devastating condition.11.
Rabbi JF Valaulikar G Appling NA Bee TK Ostrow BF Weiman DS 《The Annals of thoracic surgery》2012,93(4):e99-100
The abdominal compartment syndrome has been associated with trauma or primary abdominal procedures. The secondary abdominal compartment syndrome which is not associated with a primary abdominal process is seen in burns and other clinical situations where aggressive fluid resuscitation is needed. This case report describes a secondary abdominal compartment syndrome that occurred during an elective coronary revascularization which resulted in an inability to wean from cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). After a decompressive laparotomy was done, the patient was successfully weaned from bypass. 相似文献
12.
The abdominal compartment syndrome 总被引:4,自引:0,他引:4
Orlando R Eddy VA Jacobs LM Stadelmann WK 《Archives of surgery (Chicago, Ill. : 1960)》2004,139(4):415-422
13.
Avery B. Nathens Frederick D. Brenneman Bernard R. Boulanger 《Canadian journal of surgery》1997,40(4):254-258
The abdominal compartment syndrome refers to the alterations in respiratory mechanics, hemodynamic parameters and renal function that occur as a result of a sustained increase in intra-abdominal pressure. The syndrome may follow a diverse series of insults, including laparotomy for severe abdominal trauma, ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm and intra-abdominal infection. Diagnosis depends on recognizing the clinical picture in patients at risk, followed by an objective measurement of intra-abdominal pressure. Successful management may require abdominal decompression with temporary abdominal closure. Despite urgent decompression, the death rate is high because of the severity of the patients’ underlying illness. 相似文献
14.
Amplified cytokine response and lung injury by sequential hemorrhagic shock and abdominal compartment syndrome in a laboratory model of ischemia-reperfusion 总被引:10,自引:0,他引:10
Oda J Ivatury RR Blocher CR Malhotra AJ Sugerman HJ 《The Journal of trauma》2002,52(4):625-31; discussion 632
BACKGROUND: Increased intra-abdominal pressure has been shown to result in a myriad of physiologic aberrations that result in the abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS). The clinically relevant combination of hemorrhagic shock and resuscitation and subsequent ACS, however, has not been studied in detail. We hypothesized that sequential hemorrhagic shock (HS) and ACS would result in greater cytokine activation and polymorphonuclear neutrophil (PMN)-mediated lung injury than with either insult alone. METHODS: Twenty Yorkshire swine (20-30 kg) were studied. Group 1 (n = 5) was hemorrhaged to a mean arterial pressure of 25 to 30 mm Hg for 60 minutes and resuscitated to baseline mean arterial pressure. Intra-abdominal pressure was then increased to 30 mm Hg above baseline and maintained for 60 minutes. Group 2 (n = 5) was subjected to HS alone and Group 3 (n = 5) to ACS alone. Group 4 (n = 5) had sham experiment without HS or ACS. Central and portal venous interleukin-1beta, interleukin-8, and tumor necrosis factor-alpha levels were serially measured. Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) for protein and PMNs was performed at baseline and 24 hours after resuscitation. Lung myeloperoxidase was evaluated at 24 hours after resuscitation. RESULTS: Portal and central vein cytokine levels were equivalent but were significantly higher in Group 1 than in other groups. BAL PMNs were higher (p < 0.05) in Group 1 (4.1 +/- 2.0 x 106) than in the other groups (0.6 +/- 0.5, 1.4 +/- 1.3, and 0.1 +/- 0.0 x 106, respectively) and lung myeloperoxidase activity was higher (p < 0.05) in Group 1 (134.6 +/- 57.6 x 106/g) than in the other groups (40.3 +/- 14.7, 46.1 +/- 22.4, and 7.73 +/- 4.4 x 106/g, respectively). BAL protein was higher (p < 0.01) in Group 1 (0.92 +/- 0.32 mg/mL) compared with the other groups (0.22 +/- 0.08, 0.29 +/- 0.11, and 0.08 +/- 0.06 mg/mL, respectively). CONCLUSION: In this clinically relevant model, sequential insults of ischemia-reperfusion (HS and resuscitation) and ACS were associated with significantly increased portal and central venous cytokine levels and more severe lung injury than HS or ACS alone. 相似文献
15.
The abdominal compartment syndrome 总被引:4,自引:0,他引:4
The abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) causes dysfunctions of various organs through a progressive unphysiologic increase of the intraabdominal pressure. While the primary ACS is a result of the underlying disease/injury, secondary ACS is caused by surgical interventions. In the severely injured patient intra- and/or retroperitoneal bleeding, edema of viscera due to systemic ischemia reperfusion injury following hemorrhagic shock, abdominal/pelvic packing, and laparotomy closure under tension lead to ACS. The clinical signs of ACS are a tense abdomen with a decreased abdominal wall compliance. Early signs of ACS are a rise in inspiratory pressure and oliguria. Manifest ACS results in anuria, respiratory failure, reduced intestinal perfusion, and low cardiac output syndrome. If untreated, patients die due to left ventricular failure. Diagnosis of ACS is made using the patient's history including the injury pattern, the symptoms, the time period between injury and the occurrence of organ dysfunctions, and the physiologic response to decompression. Frequent determinations of the bladder pressure represent the "golden standard" for early recognition of ACS. Decompressive laparotomy should be performed with a bladder pressure > or = 20 mmHg and rapidly restores impaired organ functions. In the case of a multiple injured patients in shock or with associated severe head injury decompressive laparotomy may even be carried out at a lower bladder pressure. The abdomen is left open. In most patients staged laparotomy is necessary. The final closure of the abdominal wall is carried out after the edema have resolved between day 6 and 8 after primary laparotomy. 相似文献
16.
17.
Secondary extremity compartment syndrome 总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1
BACKGROUND: Abdominal compartment syndrome has been reported to occur after fluid resuscitation in injured patients, even in the absence of intra-abdominal injuries. This report describes a set of patients who developed the secondary extremity compartment syndrome (SECS) in uninjured extremities after resuscitation for other injuries. METHODS: This study was a retrospective chart review of all trauma patients developing SECS at a Level I trauma center. Data are mean +/- SD. RESULTS: From 1996 to 2001, 10 patients (8 men, age 31 +/- 13 years, Injury Severity Score of 29 +/- 17, and 3 with penetrating trauma) from a series of 11,996 trauma admissions developed SECS after resuscitation for other injuries. The mean number of extremities developing the SECS per patient was 3.1. This included compartment syndromes in 10 upper extremities and in 12 lower extremities that did not have any apparent injuries (i.e., contusions, fractures, or vascular injuries). After evaluation by the trauma team, abdominal silos were needed in 7 of the 10 patients also, and the mortality in patients with the SECS was 70%. CONCLUSION: SECS is a rare complication of the postresuscitation systemic inflammatory response syndrome, is associated with significant morbidity, and may be a marker for mortality. SECS should be ruled out by measurement of compartment pressures in uninjured and injured extremities in patients with severe diffuse edema after resuscitation for injury. 相似文献
18.
随着基础医学和临床医学研究的进展,人们对腹腔高压危害性的认识逐渐加深.腹腔间隔室综合征在病因、诊断、治疗等方面有了较大进步.但目前研究认为,腹腔间隔室综合征病死率仍很高.因此,早期及时发现和正确治疗以取得最佳治疗效果,显得很重要,唯一有效的方法为开腹减压,本文对腹腔间隔室综合征的研究进展作一综述. 相似文献
19.
Pathophysiology of abdominal compartment syndrome 总被引:5,自引:0,他引:5
For over a century, raised intra-abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) has been known. The physiology and clinical results of this syndrome produce significant morbidity and quite high mortality rates. Increased intra-abdominal pressure causes progressive hypoperfusion and ischemia of the intestines as well as other peritoneal and retroperitoneal structures, including the pulmonary, cardiovascular, renal, splanchnic, and central nervous systems. The most effective prevention of ACS is early recognition and preemptive interventions, as well the choice of appropriate abdominal closures with constant care and surveillance in intensive care units. 相似文献
20.
Van Hee R 《Il Giornale di chirurgia》2007,28(11-12):413-418