Acute Effects of Intraoperative Multisite Ventricular Pacing on Left Ventricular Function and Activation/Contraction Sequence in Patients with Depressed Ventricular Function

Multisite Pacing Effect on LV Function. Introduction : We hypothesized that simultaneous right and left ventricular apical pacing would result in improvement in left ventricular function due to improved coordination of segmental ventricular contraction. Structural changes in ventricular muscle present in dilated cardiomyopathy compromise ventricular excitation and mechanical contraction.
Methods and Results : Eleven patients with depressed left ventricular function having cardiac surgery underwent epicardial multisite pacing with continuous transesophageal echocardiographic imaging. Quantitative measurement of percent fractional area change was performed, and segmental changes in contraction sequence resulting from simultaneous right and left ventricular pacing were assessed by application of phase analysis to recorded transesophageal images. There was no statistically significant difference between the paced QRS duration achieved with simultaneous right and left ventricular apical pacing and the native QRS duration (139 ± 39 msec vs 106 ± 18 msec, P = NS), but all other paced modes resulted in longer QRS durations. Percent fractional area change improved with simultaneous right and left ventricular apical pacing hut not with other paced modes (41.5 ± 11.9 vs 34.3 ± 9.7, P < 0.01). Phase analysis demonstrated a resequencing of segmental left ventricular activation/contraction when compared to baseline ventricular activation.
Conclusion : Simultaneous right and left ventricular apical pacing results in acute improvements in global ventricular performance in patients with depressed ventricular function. Improvements may result from pacing-induced global coordination through recruitment of left and right ventricular apical and septal segments critical to effective ventricular contraction.     

Chronic Effect of Right Ventricular Pacing on Left Ventricular Rotational Synchrony in Patients with Complete Atrioventricular Block

Background: Chronic effect of right ventricular (RV) pacing on left ventricular (LV) rotational synchrony is unknown. The aim of this study is to assess chronic effect of RV pacing on LV rotational synchrony using two‐dimensional ultrasound speckle tracking imaging. Methods and Results: Thirty‐one patients who underwent dual‐chamber pacemaker implantation for complete atrioventricular block, and age‐ and sex‐matched 10 healthy controls were assessed. We divided our patients into RV apical (RVA, n = 16) and RV outflow tract (RVOT, n = 15) pacing groups. We compared echocardiographic parameters such as LV rotational synchrony between pacing groups and healthy control. We defined Q to peak rotation interval as the interval from the beginning of the Q‐wave to the peak apical counter‐clockwise or peak basal clockwise rotation. We calculated apical–basal rotation delay by subtracting basal Q to peak rotation interval from apical one as the representative of rotational synchronization. Apical–basal rotation delay of RVA pacing was significantly longer than that of healthy control (100 ± 110 vs. ?6 ± 15 ms, P = 0.002), while there was no statistically significant difference between RVOT pacing and healthy control (?3 ± 99 vs. ?6 ± 15 ms, P = 0.919). Conclusions: LV rotation during RVOT pacing is synchronous at 15 months after pacemaker implantation, while RVA pacing provokes LV rotational dyssynchrony by inducing delayed apical rotation at 7 years after pacemaker implantation in patients with complete atrioventricular block. (Echocardiography 2011;28:69‐75)     

Biventricular stimulation to prevent cardiac desynchronization: rationale, design, and endpoints of the 'Biventricular Pacing for Atrioventricular Block to Prevent Cardiac Desynchronization (BioPace)' study.

Despite the deleterious effects of cardiac dyssynchrony and the positive effects of cardiac resynchronization therapy, patients with high-degree atrioventricular block continue to receive desynchronizing right ventricular (RV) pacing systems. Although it is unclear whether the negative effects of RV pacing and left bundle branch block (LBBB) are comparable, and whether they depend on the presence and the degree of structural heart disease, one may hypothesize that RV pacing may have similar effects to LBBB. In the BioPace trial, the long-term effects of RV pacing vs. biventricular pacing will be prospectively compared in 1200 pacemaker patients with high likelihood of mostly paced ventricular events, regardless of whether in sinus rhythm or in atrial fibrillation (AF). After echocardiographic examination of left ventricular (LV) function, patients will be randomly assigned to the implantation of an RV vs. a biventricular pacing system and followed for up to 5 years. Primary study endpoints are survival, quality of life (QoL), and the distance covered in a 6-min hall walk (6-MHW) at 24 months after implantation. Secondary endpoints are QoL and the 6-MHW result at 12 months after implantation, hospitalization rate, LV dimensions, LV ejection fraction, and the development of chronic AF and other adverse events.     

Long‐Term Mechanical Consequences of Permanent Right Ventricular Pacing: Effect of Pacing Site

Optimal Right Ventricular Pacing Introduction: Long‐term right ventricular apical (RVA) pacing has been associated with adverse effects on left ventricular systolic function; however, the comparative effects of right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) pacing are unknown. Our aim was therefore to examine the long‐term effects of septal RVOT versus RVA pacing on left ventricular and atrial structure and function. Methods: Fifty‐eight patients who were prospectively randomized to long‐term pacing either from the right ventricular apex or RVOT septum were studied echocardiographically. Left ventricular (LV) and atrial (LA) volumes were measured. LV 2D strain and tissue velocity images were analyzed to measure 18‐segment time‐to‐peak longitudinal systolic strain and 12‐segment time‐to‐peak systolic tissue velocity. Intra‐LV synchrony was assessed by their respective standard deviations. Interventricular mechanical delay was measured as the difference in time‐to‐onset of systolic flow in the RVOT and LV outflow tract. Septal A’ was measured using tissue velocity images. Results: Following 29 ± 10 months pacing, there was a significant difference in LV ejection fraction (P < 0.001), LV end‐systolic volume (P = 0.007), and LA volume (P = 0.02) favoring the RVOT‐paced group over the RVA‐paced patients. RVA‐pacing was associated with greater interventricular mechanical dyssynchrony and intra‐LV dyssynchrony than RVOT‐pacing. Septal A’ was adversely affected by intra‐LV dyssynchrony (P < 0.05). Conclusions: Long‐term RVOT‐pacing was associated with superior indices of LV structure and function compared with RVA‐pacing, and was associated with less adverse LA remodeling. If pacing cannot be avoided, the RVOT septum may be the preferred site for right ventricular pacing. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. 21, pp. 1120‐1126)     

Effect of pacing the right ventricular mid-septum tract in patients with permanent atrial fibrillation and low ejection fraction

Introduction: Permanent right ventricular (RV) pacing leads have been traditionally implanted in the right ventricular apex (RVA). Nowadays, some deleterious effects of RVA pacing have been recognized. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of different sites of RV pacing in patients with permanent atrial fibrillation (AF) and low ejection fraction (LEF) needing a pacemaker (PM) implantation.
Methods: Two hundred seventy-three patients with permanent AF and EF <30% underwent a one-chamber rate responsive (VVIR) PM implant procedure. Patients were divided into two groups: Group A, including 113 patients with the pacing lead tip placed in the RV mid-septum, and Group B of 120 patients with the pacing lead tip placed at the apex of RV. All patients had clinical and Echo control after 1, 3, 6, 12, and 18 months after PM implantation to assess New York Heart Association (NYHA) class and EF.
Results: After 18 months, NYHA class changed in Group A from 2.9 ± 0.4 at implant to 1.7 ± 0.3 at 18 months (P = 0.01), and in Group B from 3.0 ± 0.5 at implant to 3.3 ± 0.6 at 18 months (P = n.s.). EF increased in Group A: 28 ± 2% at implant, 33 ± 1% at 18 months (P = 0.0125), while no significant changes were observed in Group B: at implant 27 ± 2%, 26 ± 2% at 18 months (P = n.s.).
Conclusion: The present study suggests that more physiological pacing from the RV sept can improve EF and quality of life (QoL) in patients with permanent AF and low EF needing a PM.     

A randomized comparison of permanent septal versus apical right ventricular pacing: short-term results

OBJECTIVES: This study compared chronic right ventricular (RV) pacing at the septum versus apex. BACKGROUND: Chronic RV apical pacing may be detrimental to ventricular function. This randomized, pilot study examined whether, compared with apical, permanent septal pacing preserves cardiac function. METHODS: Ablation of the atrioventricular junction for permanent AF, followed by implantation of a DDDR pacemaker connected to two ventricular leads was performed in 28 patients. One lead screwed into the septum and another placed at the apex were connected to the atrial and ventricular port, respectively. Septum or apex was paced by programming AAIR or VVIR modes, respectively. Patients were randomly assigned, 4 months later, to pacing at one site for 3 months, and crossed over to the other for 3 months. New York Heart Association class, QRS width and axis, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), exercise duration, and peak oxygen uptake were measured. Results in patients with LVEF > 45% and < or = 45% were compared. RESULTS: Septal pacing was associated with shorter QRS (145 +/- 4 msec vs 170 +/- 4 msec, P < 0.01) and normal axis (40 degrees +/- 10 degrees vs -71 +/- 4 degrees , P < 0.01). At 3 months, among patients with baseline LVEF < or = 45%, LVEF was 42 +/- 5% after septal pacing versus 37 +/- 4% after apical pacing (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In contrast to RV apical pacing, chronic RV septal pacing preserved LVEF in patients with baseline LVEF < or = 45%.     

The Relationship of Bipolar Left Ventricular Pacing Stimulus Intensity to Cardiac Depolarization and Repolarization in Humans with Cardiac Resynchronization Devices

Background: Myocardial depolarization can be altered by varying pacing stimulus output. This may have implications on response rates for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). The purpose of our study was to determine the relationship of left ventricular (LV) pacing stimulus intensity to measures of depolarization and repolarization in humans with CRT devices.
Methods: In 37 patients with a CRT device and bipolar LV leads, bipolar LV-only pacing from maximum output to threshold was performed. The presence of changes in depolarization was defined by predetermined changes in ECG morphology that accompanied a change in bipolar stimulus amplitude. ECG parameters and the EGMs were analyzed at various LV pacing stimulus intensities.
Results: Changes in ECG morphology were apparent in 70% of patients. These occurred at a mean LV stimulus amplitude of greater than 2.7 ± 0.8 V at 1 ms. Of the patients with changes in surface ECG, the transventricular conduction time decreased from 155 ± 41 ms at low output to 141 ± 39 ms at high output (P < 0.01). Despite a significant reduction in QRS duration with high output, mean QTc and JTc interval increased with increasing LV stimulus strength (539 ± 45 vs 559 ± 46 ms (P < 0.01) and 353 ± 31 ms vs 377 ± 32 (P < 0.01)).
Conclusion: Increased LV stimulus intensity, independent of RV anodal capture, is associated with faster transventricular conduction time, changes in myocardial depolarization, and longer QT intervals. These findings have important implications on the relationship of programmed LV pacing output to pacing-induced proarrhythmia and clinical CRT response rates.     

Left Atrial Responses to Acute Right Ventricular Apical Pacing in Patients with Sick Sinus Syndrome

Chronic right ventricular apical (RVA) pacing can lead to an increased risk of heart failure and atrial fibrillation, but the acute effects of RVA pacing on left atrial (LA) function are not well known. Twenty‐four patients with sick sinus syndrome and intact intrinsic atrioventricular conduction were included. All patients received dual‐chamber pacemaker implants with the atrial lead in the right atrial appendage and the ventricular lead in the right ventricular (RV) apex. Transthoracic standard and strain echocardiography (measured by tissue Doppler imaging and speckle tracking image) were performed to identify functional changes in the left ventricle (LV) and LA before and after 1 hour of RVA pacing. The LA volume index did not change after pacing; however, the ratio of peak early diastolic mitral flow velocity (E) to peak early diastolic mitral annular velocity (Ea) was significantly increased and peak systolic LA strain (Sm), mean peak systolic LA strain rate (SmSR), peak early diastolic LA strain rate (EmSR), and peak late diastolic LA strain rate (AmSR) were significantly reduced after RV pacing. LV dyssynchrony, induced by RV pacing, had a significant correlation with E/Ea, Sm, and SmSR after pacing. E/Ea also had a negative correlation with Sm and SmSR after pacing. Multivariate regression analysis identified LV dyssynchrony and E/Ea as important factors that affect Sm, SmSR, EmSR, and AmSR after acute RVA pacing. Acute RVA pacing results in LA functional change and LV dyssynchrony and higher LV filling pressures reflected by E/Ea are important causes of LA dysfunction after acute RVA pacing.     

Acute Effects of Single‐site Pacing from the Left and Right Ventricle on Ventricular Function and Ventricular–Ventricular Interactions in Children with Normal Hearts

Objective. We studied, as a physiological benchmark, acute effects of right ventricular (RV) apical, RV outflow, and left ventricular (LV) pacing in children with normal cardiac function on LV and RV function and ventricular–ventricular interactions. Design. The design of the study was a prospective, acute intervention. Setting. The study was conducted in a tertiary care electrophysiology laboratory. Population and Methods. Seven children (mean ± SD, 12 ± 4 years) were paced after accessory pathway ablation, at baseline (AOO), and with atrioventricular pacing (DOO) from the RV apex, RV outflow, and left ventricle. Outcome Measures. Right ventricular dP/dT_max and RV dP/dT_neg (high‐fidelity transducer‐tipped catheters, Millar Instruments, Houston, TX, USA), cardiac index (Fick), blood pressure, and QRS duration were measured at each pacing condition. Intra‐ and interventricular mechanical dyssynchrony, systolic‐ and diastolic peak tissue velocities, and isovolumic acceleration were recorded by tissue Doppler imaging at the lateral mitral, septal, and tricuspid annuli at each condition. Results at each pacing condition were compared by repeated‐measures analysis of variance. Results. Pacing prolonged QRS duration, causing electrical dyssynchrony (86 ± 19 ms [baseline], 141 ± 44 ms [RV apex], 121 ± 18 ms [RV outflow], and 136 ± 34 ms [LV], P < .01). Right ventricular outflow pacing caused LV intraventricular delay (63 ± 52 vs. 12 ± 7 ms, P < .05). Right ventricular apical pacing caused interventricular delay (61 ± 29 vs. 25 ± 18 ms, P < .05). There were no significant changes in blood pressure, cardiac index, RV dp/dT_max, RV dP/dT_neg, regional tissue velocities, or isovolumic acceleration during any of the pacing conditions, indicating preserved ventricular function and hemodynamics. No important ventricular–ventricular interactions were seen. Conclusions. In children with normal cardiac anatomy and function, single‐site RV apical, RV outflow, and LV pacing induce electromechanical dyssynchrony without significantly changing ventricular function or hemodynamics, or adversely affecting ventricular–ventricular interactions.     

New-onset heart failure after permanent right ventricular apical pacing in patients with acquired high-grade atrioventricular block and normal left ventricular function

Introduction: Emerging data have suggested that right ventricular (RV) apical pacing results in progressive left ventricular (LV) dysfunction and contributes to the development of heart failure (HF). This study aimed to investigate the prevalence and clinical predictors for the development of new-onset HF after long-term RV apical pacing in patients with acquired atrioventricular (AV) block who require permanent pacing.
Methods: We studied the clinical outcomes after long-term RV apical pacing for acquired AV block in 304 patients without a prior history of HF. All patients had >90% ventricular pacing as determined by device diagnostic data.
Results: After a median follow-up of 7.8 years, 79 patients (26.0%) developed new-onset HF after RV apical pacing. Univariate Cox-regression analysis revealed that older age at the time of pacemaker implantation (P < 0.001), the presence of coronary artery disease (CAD) (P < 0.001) or atrial fibrillation (P = 0.03), VVI pacemaker (P < 0.001), wider paced QRS duration (P < 0.001), and new-onset myocardial infarction (P < 0.001) were predictors for HF. Multivariate analysis revealed that older age at implantation (Hazard ratio [HR] 1.06, 95% confidential interval [CI] 1.04–1.09, P < 0.001), CAD (HR 1.98, 95% CI 1.12–3.50, P < 0.05), and a wider paced QRS duration (HR 1.27 for each 10 ms increment, 95% CI 1.11–1.45, P = 0.001) were independent predictors of HF. Furthermore, cardiovascular mortality was significantly increased in those with HF (36.7% vs. 2.7%, P < 0.001).
Conclusions: After a median follow-up of 7.8 years, permanent RV apical pacing was associated with HF in 26% of patients. Elderly age at the time of implant, a wider paced QRS duration and the presence of CAD independently predicted new-onset HF. More importantly, HF after RV apical pacing was associated with a higher cardiovascular mortality.     

Avoidance of right ventricular pacing in cardiac resynchronization therapy improves right ventricular hemodynamics in heart failure patients

Background: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) applied by pacing the left and right ventricles (BiV) has been shown to provide synchronous left ventricular (LV) contraction in heart failure patients. CRT may also be accomplished through synchronization of a properly timed LV pacing impulse with intrinsically conducted activation wave fronts. Elimination of right ventricular (RV) pacing may provide a more physiological RV contraction pattern and reduce device current drain. We evaluated the effects of LV and BiV pacing over a range of atrioventricular intervals on the performance of both ventricles.
Methods: Acute LV and RV hemodynamic data from 17 patients with heart failure (EF = 30 ± 1%) and a wide QRS (138 ± 25 msec) or mechanical dyssynchrony were acquired during intrinsic rhythm, BiV, and LV pacing.
Results: The highest LV dP/dt_max was achieved during LV pre- (LV paced prior to an RV sense) and BiV pacing, followed by that obtained during LV post-pacing (LV paced after an RV sense) and the lowest LV dP/dt_max was recorded during intrinsic rhythm. Compared with BiV pacing, LV pre-pacing significantly improved RV dP/dt_max (378 ± 136 mmHg/second vs 397 ± 136 mmHg/second, P < 0.05) and preserved RV cycle efficiency (61.6 ± 14.6% vs 68.6 ± 11.4%, P < 0.05) and stroke volume (6.6 ± 4.4 mL vs 9.0 ± 6.3 mL, P < 0.05). Based on LV dP/dt_max, the optimal atrioventricular interval could be estimated by subtracting 30 msec from the intrinsic atrial to sensed RV interval.
Conclusions: Synchronized LV pacing produces acute LV and systemic hemodynamic benefits similar to BiV pacing. LV pacing at an appropriate atrioventricular interval prior to the RV sensed impulse provides superior RV hemodynamics compared with BiV pacing.     

Right ventricular outflow versus apical pacing in pacemaker patients with congestive heart failure and atrial fibrillation

INTRODUCTION: Prior studies suggest that right ventricular apical (RVA) pacing has deleterious effects. Whether the right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) is a more optimal site for permanent pacing in patients with congestive heart failure (CHF) has not been established. METHODS AND RESULTS: We conducted a randomized, cross-over trial to determine whether quality of life (QOL) is better after 3 months of RVOT than RVA pacing in 103 pacemaker recipients with CHF, left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction (LV ejection fraction < or = 40%), and chronic atrial fibrillation (AF). An additional aim was to compare dual-site (RVOT + RVA, 31-ms delay) with single-site RVA and RVOT pacing. QRS duration was shorter during RVOT (167 +/- 45 ms) and dual-site (149 +/- 19 ms) than RVA pacing (180 +/- 58 ms, P < 0.0001). At 6 months, the RVOT group had higher (P = 0.01) role-emotional QOL subscale scores than the RVA group. At 9 months, there were no significant differences in QOL scores between RVOT and RVA groups. Comparing RVOT to RVA pacing within the same patient, mental health subscale scores were better (P = 0.03) during RVOT pacing. After 9 months of follow-up, LVEF was higher (P = 0.04) in those assigned to RVA rather than RVOT pacing between months 6 and 9. After 3 months of dual-site RV pacing, physical functioning was worse (P = 0.04) than during RVA pacing, mental health was worse (P = 0.02) than during RVOT pacing, and New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class was slightly better (P = 0.03) than during RVOT pacing. There were no other significant differences between RVA, RVOT and dual-site RV pacing in QOL scores, NYHA class, distance walked in 6 minutes, LV ejection fraction, or mitral regurgitation. CONCLUSION: In patients with CHF, LV dysfunction, and chronic AF, RVOT and dual-site RV pacing shorten QRS duration but after 3 months do not consistently improve QOL or other clinical outcomes compared with RVA pacing.     

The Role of Speckle Tracking Strain Imaging in Cardiac Pacing

In recent years, concerns have been raised about possible harmful effects of long-term right ventricular (RV) apical pacing. These detrimental effects may be related to changes in left ventricular (LV) mechanics during RV apical pacing. As a consequence, alternative RV pacing sites have been proposed, and in selected patients an upgrade from RV to biventricular pacing may be considered. Novel two-dimensional (2D) speckle tracking strain imaging allows detailed evaluation of LV mechanics, including LV mechanical dyssynchrony, LV strain and LV torsion. In this review, the role of speckle tracking strain imaging in the evaluation of LV function in patients with RV apical pacing will be reviewed. The effects of RV apical pacing on LV mechanical dyssynchrony, LV strain and LV torsion will be discussed. In addition, the role of speckle tracking strain imaging in the selection of the optimal (alternative) RV pacing site and in the selection of patients who may benefit from an upgrade from RV apical pacing to biventricular pacing will be reviewed.     

Preventing ventricular dysfunction in pacemaker patients without advanced heart failure: rationale and design of the PREVENT-HF study.

AIMS: Right ventricular (RV) pacing has been shown to cause heart failure symptoms in patients with and without previous systolic left ventricular (LV) dysfunction. The aim here was to evaluate the preventive effect of biventricular pacing vs. RV apical pacing in patients with indication for permanent ventricular pacing. Methods PREVENT-HF is an ongoing multicentre randomized controlled pilot study designed to assess whether biventricular pacing is superior to RV pacing in patients receiving a bradycardia pacemaker for standard indications. Patients with Class I or IIa indication according to ACC/AHA guidelines for cardiac pacing judged likely to require high (>or=80%) ventricular pacing are randomized to receive either RV or biventricular stimulation. Patients are ineligible if younger than 18 years, have Class III or IV heart failure, or experienced a recent myocardial infarction or cardiac surgery. Echocardiographic parameters of LV function are assessed at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months. The primary endpoint is change in LV end diastolic volume. Secondary outcomes include LV ejection fraction, mortality, morbidity, and mitral regurgitation. In subsets of patients, NT-pro-BNP and oxygen uptake are analysed. Centres in Spain (five), Italy (four), and Germany (seven) will enrol 100 patients. CONCLUSION: PREVENT-HF will contribute to better define the role of chronic biventricular pacing for advanced atrioventricular block.     

Preferred left ventricular lead position for upgrade from right ventricular pacing to cardiac resynchronization therapy

Introduction

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is well-established for treating symptomatic heart failure with electrical dyssynchrony. The left ventricular (LV) lead position is recommended at LV posterolateral to lateral sites in patients with left bundle branch block; however, its preferred region remains unclear in patients being upgraded from right ventricular (RV) apical pacing to CRT. This study aimed to identify the preferred LV lead position for upgrading conventional RV apical pacing to CRT.

Methods

We used electrode catheters positioned at the RV apex and LV anterolateral and posterolateral sites via the coronary sinus (CS) branches to measure the ratio of activation time to QRS duration from the RV apex to the LV anterolateral and posterolateral sites during RV apical pacing. Simultaneous biventricular pacing was performed at the RV apex and each LV site, and the differences in QRS duration and LV dP/dt_max from those of RV apical pacing were measured.

Results

Thirty-seven patients with anterolateral and posterolateral LV CS branches were included. During RV apical pacing, the average ratio of activation time to QRS duration was higher at the LV anterolateral site than at the LV posterolateral site (0.90 ± 0.06 vs. 0.71 ± 0.11, p < .001). The decreasing ratio of QRS duration and the increasing ratio of LV dP/dt_max were higher at the LV anterolateral site than at the posterolateral site (45.7 ± 18.0% vs. 32.0 ± 17.6%, p < .001; 12.7 ± 2.9% vs. 3.7 ± 8.2%, p < .001, respectively) during biventricular pacing compared with RV apical pacing.

Conclusion

The LV anterolateral site is the preferred LV lead position in patients being upgraded from conventional RV apical pacing to CRT.     

Biventricular versus conventional right ventricular stimulation for patients with standard pacing indication and left ventricular dysfunction: the Homburg Biventricular Pacing Evaluation (HOBIPACE).

OBJECTIVES: The Homburg Biventricular Pacing Evaluation (HOBIPACE) is the first randomized controlled study that compares the biventricular (BV) pacing approach with conventional right ventricular (RV) pacing in patients with left ventricular (LV) dysfunction and a standard indication for antibradycardia pacing in the ventricle. BACKGROUND: In patients with LV dysfunction and atrioventricular block, conventional RV pacing may yield a detrimental effect on LV function. METHODS: Thirty patients with standard indication for permanent ventricular pacing and LV dysfunction defined by an LV end-diastolic diameter > or =60 mm and an ejection fraction < or =40% were included. Using a prospective, randomized crossover design, three months of RV pacing were compared with three months of BV pacing with regard to LV function, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) serum concentration, exercise capacity, and quality of life. RESULTS: When compared with RV pacing, BV stimulation reduced LV end-diastolic (-9.0%, p = 0.022) and end-systolic volumes (-16.9%, p < 0.001), NT-proBNP level (-31.0%, p < 0.002), and the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure score (-18.9%, p = 0.01). Left ventricular ejection fraction (+22.1%), peak oxygen consumption (+12.0%), oxygen uptake at the ventilatory threshold (+12.5%), and peak circulatory power (+21.0%) were higher (p < 0.0002) with BV pacing. The benefit of BV over RV pacing was similar for patients with (n = 9) and without (n = 21) atrial fibrillation. Right ventricular function was not affected by BV pacing. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with LV dysfunction who need permanent ventricular pacing support, BV stimulation is superior to conventional RV pacing with regard to LV function, quality of life, and maximal as well as submaximal exercise capacity.     

Spatial Heterogeneity of Protein Expression Induced by Dyssynchronous Right Ventricular Pacing in the Left Ventricle of Dogs With Preserved Systolic Function

BackgroundRight ventricular (RV) apical pacing may result in ventricular dyssynchrony, which is associated with functional and morphological changes in the left ventricle (LV). Our aim is to assess contraction and hypertrophy-related protein expression changes in the LV after RV apical pacing.Methods and ResultsSix dogs underwent dual chamber pacemaker (DDD) implantation and atrioventricular nodal catheter ablation. The pacing group received atria-sensed RV apical pacing for 12 weeks. LV dyssynchrony was assessed with speckle tracking technique. Subsequently, hearts were processed for Western blotting. Four sham-operated dogs were included for comparison. After 12 weeks of RV pacing, cardiac chamber size and LV ejection fraction remained unchanged. Both electrical and mechanical dyssynchrony were evident in RV-paced dogs compared with sham-operated dogs. The late-activated LV lateral wall of paced dogs displayed a 23% reduction in the amount of sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca²⁺ ATPase, a 32% reduction in phospholamban levels, but a 3.6-fold increase in phospho-JNK expression, a 2.2-fold increase in phospho-p38, and 1.9-fold increase in phospho-ERK expression. There were no significant differences in the early-activated LV septum between paced and sham dogs.ConclusionsTemporal dispersion of mechanical activation by RV apical pacing induced spatial dispersion of protein expression in the LV.     

Apparent Acute Reversible Right Ventricular Pacing‐Induced Left Ventricular Dysfunction

Apparent Acute Reversible Right Ventricular Pacing‐Induced Left Ventricular Dysfunction . We report the case of a 70‐year‐old Caucasian male with a dual chamber (right atrium/right ventricle) pacemaker implanted for sinus node dysfunction and not pacemaker (PM) dependent who was found to have an apparent acute worsening of left ventricular (LV) function with right ventricular (RV) apical pacing caused by the mode switch to VVI pacing as battery depletion occurred. LV dysfunction resolved immediately with RV pacing turned off. To our knowledge, this is the first report of this phenomenon. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. 24, pp. 224‐226, February 2013)     

Effect of Left Ventricular Function on Long-Term Left Ventricular Pacing and Sensing Threshold

Background: The effect of left ventricular (LV) systolic function on the long-term left ventricular pacing and sensing threshold is unclear. Methods and Results: We studied the effect of LV ejection fraction (LVEF) on the LV pacing and sensing threshold in 56 patients (mean age: 70.2 ± 10.5 years) underwent permanent LV pacing using a self-retaining coronary sinus lead (Model 1055 K, St Jude Medical, USA). In 49 patients, the LV lead was implanted for conventional pacemaker indication (sick sinus syndrome = 14, heart block = 26 or slow atrial fibrillation = 9). The remaining 7 patients were implanted for congestive heart failure. The LV pacing and sensing threshold, and lead impedance were compared between patients with LVEF <40% (Group 1, n = 28) and LVEF >40% (Group 2, n = 28) during implant and at 3-month follow up. The LV pacing lead was successfully implanted in all patients without any lead dislodgement on follow-up. At implant, Group 1 patients had a significant lower R wave amplitude, but similar LV pacing threshold and lead impedance as compared to Group 2. However, at 3-month follow-up, Group 1 patients had a significantly higher LV pacing threshold compared to Group 2 patients. There were no significant differences in the sensing threshold and lead impedance between the two groups. Furthermore, there was also a significant interval increase in LV pacing threshold in Group 1 patients (0.94 ± 0.12 V) after 3 months, but not in Group 2 patients (0.16 ± 0.08 V, p < 0.01). Conclusions: The results of this study suggest that the LV systolic function has a significant impact on the long-term LV pacing threshold. The long-term left ventricular pacing threshold in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction increased after implant and was higher than patients with normal left ventricular systolic function.