Benzoyl peroxide: a review of its current use in the treatment of acne vulgaris

Background: Owing to the use of topical and systemic antibiotics for acne vulgaris, the incidence of antibiotic-resistant Propionibacterium acnes is increasing worldwide. Topical benzoyl peroxide (BPO) is an alternative to antibiotics in the treatment of acne vulgaris. Objective: This review describes and evaluates recent clinical literature regarding the efficacy and tolerability of BPO. Methods: A PubMed literature search was conducted using the keywords benzoyl peroxide, acne, and combination therapy. Results: BPO is equally effective at concentrations of 2.5, 5.0 and 10%. However, a concentration-dependent irritant dermatitis can occur with higher concentrations. The efficacy of BPO can be enhanced when used in combination with topical retinoids, antibiotics and tertiary amines. BPO-containing combinations do not induce bacterial resistance and are important first-line treatments for mild to moderate acne vulgaris.     

Transdermal penetration of topical drugs used in the treatment of acne

Acne vulgaris is a very common skin disease. Most patients present with mild to moderate acne comedonica or papulopustulosa grade I-II. The first-line treatment for these cases is generally via the topical route, whereas systemic medication is indicated when higher severity grades with small nodes or scarring occur. There are several topical agents available that affect at least one of the main pathogenetic factors responsible for the development of acne: hyperseborrhoea, hyperkeratosis, microbial colonisation and inflammatory and immunological reactions. Topical retinoids have a comedolytic and anticomedogenic activity, and some of them have anti-inflammatory potency. Azelaic acid and benzoyl peroxide have a moderate to strong antibacterial effect without inducing bacterial resistance, which is becoming a significant problem with the increasing use of topical antibacterials. Topical antiandrogens may soon be available for the treatment of the pathogenetic factor hyperseborrhoea. The transdermal penetration and the resulting systemic bioavailability of the various topical agents has not been widely considered. Apart from the retinoids, which can be associated with the risk of embryotoxicity/teratogenicity, and clindamycin, which might cause pseudomembranous colitis, information on the systemic pharmacokinetics of other topical agents is not readily available. There is still no consensus on the safe use of topical retinoids in pregnancy, and the occurrence of pseudomembranous colitis after the topical use of clindamycin does not appear to be of clinical relevance. In general, topical anti-acne agents are well tolerated and, as would be expected from their limited transdermal uptake, other significant safety concerns have not so far arisen.     

Study results of benzoyl peroxide 5%/clindamycin 1% topical gel, adapalene 0.1% gel, and use in combination for acne vulgaris

Combination therapy is the standard of care in the management of acne vulgaris. It is essential to treat as many aspects of acne pathogenesis as possible. Due to increasing insensitivity of Propionibacterium acnes to antibiotics, the concomitant use of other topical agents that exhibit other modes of antibacterial and anti-inflammatory activity is integral to the successful treatment of acne. The combination of topical benzoyl peroxide and clindamycin gel has been shown to be more effective than either agent alone. The addition of a topical retinoid may further enhance therapeutic results. This 12-week study evaluated the safety and efficacy of initial topical benzoyl peroxide 5%/clindamycin 1% gel as monotherapy and in combination with adapalene gel versus adapalene gel monotherapy in the management of acne.     

Emerging drugs for acne

Acne vulgaris is a common skin disorder that affects most individuals at some point in their lives. It may result in significant morbidity, including cutaneous scarring and psychological impairment. Current treatments include topical retinoids, benzoyl peroxide, topical and systemic antibiotics, and systemic isotretinoin. There are growing concerns of rising antibiotic resistance, significant side effects of isotretinoin therapy, and lack of safe and effective treatment for pregnant females. Recent advances in the pathogenesis of acne have led to a greater understanding of the underlying inflammatory mechanisms and the role the Propionibacterium acnes and biofilms. This has led to the development of new therapeutic targets. This article reviews emerging treatments of acne, including topical picolinic acid, topical antibiotic dapsone, systemic zinc salts, oral antibiotic lymecycline, new formulations of and synergistic combinations of benzoyl peroxide, photodynamic therapy with topical photosensitizers and potential acne vaccines.     

Common and alternate oral antibiotic therapies for acne vulgaris: a review

Acne vulgaris is an extremely common disorder affecting many adolescents and adults throughout their lifetimes. The pathogenesis of acne is multifactorial and is thought to involve excess sebum, follicular hyperkeratinization, bacterial colonization, and inflammation. Many therapeutic options exist for treating acne, including topical benzoyl peroxide, topical and oral antibiotics, topical and oral retinoids, and oral contraceptives. Oral antibiotics have been a mainstay in the treatment of acne for decades and function by exerting an antibacterial effect by reducing the follicular colonization of Propionibacterium acnes. Systemic antibiotics also have anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory properties. This article reviews the English language literature on the efficacy of various systemic antibiotics for treating acne vulgaris, including second-line and less historically used medications. We discuss the tetracyclines, including subantimicrobial dose doxycycline, macrolides (notably azithromycin), trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, cephalosporins, and fluoroquinolones as treatment options for acne vulgaris.     

Acne vulgaris: a review of antibiotic therapy

Antibiotic therapy has been integral to the management of inflammatory acne vulgaris for many years. Systemic antibiotics work via antibacterial, anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory modes of action, and have been found to be useful in managing moderate-to-severe acne. Commonly prescribed antibiotics include tetracyclines, erythromycin and trimethoprim, with or without sulfamethoxazole. In selecting the appropriate antibiotic for patients needing to receive topical or systemic antibiotic therapy, the clinician should take into account the severity of the acne, cost-effectiveness, the safety profile of the drug and the potential for development of resistance. The widespread and long-term use of antibiotics over the years has unfortunately led to the emergence of resistant bacteria. The global increase in the antibiotic resistance of Propionibacterium acnes may be a significant contributing factor in treatment failures. It is therefore essential that clinicians prescribing antibiotics for the treatment of acne adopt strategies to minimise further development of bacterial resistance. This includes addressing compliance issues, using combination therapies, avoiding prolonged antibiotic treatment, and avoiding concomitant topical and oral antibiotics with chemically dissimilar antibiotics.     

Adverse events related to topical drug treatments for acne vulgaris

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Acne vulgaris is a widespread skin disease. Topical therapy is a standard treatment for mild to moderate acne. Given the complex pathophysiology of acne, various agents with complementary action are nowadays frequently combined to increase the efficacy of therapy.

Area covered: This review focus on safety profile of topical agents used for the treatment of acne vulgaris, including topical retinoids, benzyl peroxide, azelaic acid, topical antibiotic, and combined agents. Data from clinical trials but also metanalyses, systematic reviews, and other secondary analyses are presented.

Expert opinion: In general, topical agents used for acne vulgaris have a favorable safety profile. The most commonly reported AEs were associated with local skin irritation, usually mild to moderate in intensity, intermittent, and rarely led to the cessation of therapy. Irritative potential seems to be highest for BPO and topical retinoids. Due to the possibility of development of Cutibacterium acnes resistance, topical antibiotics should not be used in monotherapy but as a part of combination therapy. In female adolescent and adults of childbearing potential, topical retinoids should be used with caution, because they are contraindicated in pregnant females (FDA Pregnancy category) C (adapalene, tretinoin) and X (tazarotene).     

A new treatment for acne vulgaris combining benzoyl peroxide with clindamycin

Topical acne therapies are widely used for the treatment of mild to moderately severe acne vulgaris. However, many available treatments have limitations associated with their use, including lengthy time to response, cosmetic acceptability, and photosensitivity. Combinations of topical antibiotics and comedolytics are especially useful, but some formulations have stability challenges. A new combination formulation that contains 1% clindamycin and 5% benzoyl peroxide (BenzaClin Topical Gel) is currently available. In clinical trials, clinical improvement occurred at the first two follow-up visits and continued throughout treatment. In addition, combination therapy with clindamycin/benzoyl peroxide gel rapidly reduces Propionibacteria acnes counts and suppresses the emergence of clindamycin-resistant P. acnes. This formulation is stable at room temperature for up to 2 months after compounding. The aqueous gel vehicle is less drying, and there is no photosensitivity associated with its use. This study compares the combination treatment of 1% clindamycin and 5% benzoyl peroxide topical gel with other therapeutic options for mild to moderately severe acne vulgaris.     

Guidelines for the management of acne vulgaris in adolescents

This article reviews the treatment of acne in adolescents. The choice of therapy should be principally based on the type of lesion and the severity of the acne, but psychosocial disability relating to the disease and the presence of scarring may also influence the approach to treatment.Mild acne generally requires topical treatment only. Benzoyl peroxide, azelaic acid, and antibacterials are generally used for inflammatory lesions. Topical retinoids are particularly effective for noninflamed lesions, and combination therapies are useful for mixed lesions. Moderately severe acne generally requires oral antibacterials. Tetracyclines/oxytetracycline and erythromycin are usually the first-line antibacterials. Second-generation tetracyclines, such as lymecycline, doxycycline, and minocycline, show improved absorption. Minocycline has the advantage of being rarely associated with Propionibacterium acnes antibacterial resistance, but can occasionally lead to potentially serious adverse effects. Trimethoprim is a useful third-line antibacterial therapy for patients resistant to other antibacterial therapies. Benzoyl peroxide should generally be used in combination with oral antibacterials as this has been shown to reduce the development of antibacterial resistance. For severe nodular acne, isotretinoin is the treatment of choice. In addition, over recent years dermatologists have increasingly used this drug to treat patients with moderate acne which has not responded to other systemic therapies, particularly when associated with scarring or significant psychological disability. However, this use is outside the current license of the drug. Isotretinoin is associated with a number of serious adverse effects and careful monitoring of patients during therapy is required.Physical therapies for the treatment of acne nodules and macrocomedones are also important adjuncts to drug therapies.     

Optimizing topical combination therapy for the treatment of acne vulgaris

Given the multifactorial and complex contributors to acne development, combination therapy is standard of care. By addressing multiple pathogenic factors, combination therapy provides a quicker and more efficacious treatment outcome than monotherapy. Topical retinoids normalize follicular keratinocyte differentiation and are anti-inflammatory. Their use is limited by the potential for cutaneous irritation. Antimicrobials reduce Propionibacterium acnes colonization on the skin and reduce the bacteria's proinflammatory effects. Topical antibiotics and benzoyl peroxide (BPO) are commonly employed in fixed-dose combination products or two separate medications. BPO has the added benefit of being comedolytic and can minimize the risk for bacterial antibiotic resistance. Like topical retinoids, BPO may cause skin irritation, burning, erythema, and peeling. Managing cutaneous side effects when using multiple products that cause irritation can be a challenge. Careful product selection, dose titration, and patient-directed regimens can help to optimize outcomes. This review presents the latest data on two topical acne products that have demonstrated excellent efficacy and tolerability profiles. In addition, their in vitro profiles suggest the potential for combination use, affording greater dosing flexibility.     

Topical antibiotic therapy: current status and future prospects

As we enter a new decade, topical antibiotics are the subject of much renewed interest and are being used on a wider scale than ever before. The reasons for using topical rather than oral therapy for a variety of dermatoses include the reduced risk of systemic side effects, the avoidance of resistance selection in the gut microflora, the higher achievable concentration of antibiotic at the site of action and the overall usage of less drug. Somewhat surprisingly, treatment costs are not reduced by the use of topical therapy. The number of antibiotics licensed for topical use has increased in recent years and now includes representatives of the tetracycline, macrolide, lincosamide, aminoglycoside and peptide families of antibiotics in addition to fusidic acid, chloramphenicol and pseudomonic acid. Opinions regarding the clinical efficacy of topical antibiotics are conflicting, and for most indications alternative oral therapies are available. Topical antibiotics are the drugs of choice for the elimination of nasal carriage of Staphylococcus aureus and for the therapy of eye and external ear infections. They are also effective in the treatment of impetigo and other superficial pyodermas and in the management of localised infected eczema. Topical preparations of erythromycin, clindamycin and tetracycline are widely prescribed for the therapy of acne and are of clinical benefit in mild--moderate cases. However, they are no more effective against inflamed lesions than benzoyl peroxide and are less effective against non-inflamed lesions. They are not as effective as oral tetracycline in moderate to severe acne and should not be considered as a therapy for severe acne, for which 13-cis-retinoic acid is the drug of choice. It is well known that many antibiotics, when used topically, especially for prolonged periods, select for antibiotic-resistant staphylococci at the skin surface. Tetracyclines, erythromycin and clindamycin also select for resistant staphylococci on the surface of intact skin when delivered by the oral route. The contribution of topical antibiotic usage to the current high level of antibiotic resistance in coagulase-negative staphylococci, which are increasingly implicated in infections of compromised hosts, has not been quantified, although it is known that cutaneous staphylococci possess a large pool of transferable resistance genes.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

Treatment considerations for inflammatory acne: clinical evidence for adapalene 0.1% in combination therapies

Acne vulgaris is an exceptionally common, chronic, and recurring disease. It involves multiple etiological factors including follicular hyperkeratinization, increased sebum production, Propionibacterium acnes proliferation, and inflammation. Presently, oral isotretinoin is the only single agent that is effective against all 4 major pathophysiologic features. However, this drug is also responsible for several serious side effects, including teratogenicity. Therefore, it should be used in only the most severe cases and alternative treatment approaches for inflammatory acne, such as initial combination therapy, should be considered first. Combination therapy in inflammatory acne simultaneously targets multiple pathogenic factors. Current guidelines recommend early initiation of combination therapy with a topical retinoid and antimicrobials for mild to moderate inflammatory acne and topical retinoids with oral antibiotics (with or without the use of benzoyl peroxide) for moderate to severe cases of acne, followed by maintenance therapy with topical retinoids. This review evaluates the rationale and clinical evidence for the use of adapalene in combination therapy for inflammatory acne.     

Topical clindamycin in the management of acne vulgaris

A small cadre of antimicrobials are commonly used and regarded as effective and safe, as systemic and topical treatments of acne vulgaris. These include oral tetracycline, doxycycline, minocycline and topical clindamycin and erythromycin. Topical antimicrobials work via both antimicrobial and non-antimicrobial mechanisms: the former due to suppression of the growth of propionibacterial species (especially Propionibacterium acnes and P. granulosum). Clindamycin appears to be superior in efficacy compared with erythromycin and tetracycline. However, the emergence and spread of resistance among propionibacteria to both erythromycin and clindamycin calls into question their long-term viability as topical anti-acne therapies. Only through judicious use of combination topical therapies (e.g., topical retinoid, benzoyl peroxide or azelaic acid plus clindamycin or erythromycin) and the practice of effective infection control (i.e., handwashing between seeing patients in the clinic) can both clindamycin's and erythromycin's widespread utility be preserved in this disorder.     

Topical clindamycin in the management of acne vulgaris

A small cadre of antimicrobials are commonly used and regarded as effective and safe, as systemic and topical treatments of acne vulgaris. These include oral tetracycline, doxycycline, minocycline and topical clindamycin and erythromycin. Topical antimicrobials work via both antimicrobial and non-antimicrobial mechanisms: the former due to suppression of the growth of propionibacterial species (especially Propionibacterium acnes and P. granulosum). Clindamycin appears to be superior in efficacy compared with erythromycin and tetracycline. However, the emergence and spread of resistance among propionibacteria to both erythromycin and clindamycin calls into question their long-term viability as topical anti-acne therapies. Only through judicious use of combination topical therapies (e.g., topical retinoid, benzoyl peroxide or azelaic acid plus clindamycin or erythromycin) and the practice of effective infection control (i.e., handwashing between seeing patients in the clinic) can both clindamycin's and erythromycin's widespread utility be preserved in this disorder.     

Treatment of ocular infections with topical antibacterials

Topically applied ophthalmic antibacterial preparations are widely used in the treatment of patients with superficial ocular infections. In addition, they are frequently used to augment treatment for intraocular infection administered systemically or via local instillation. Direct application delivers high concentrations of antimicrobial agents to the surface of the eye conveniently, quickly and with minimal systemic exposure to the agent. However, antibacterials are rapidly dissipated from the tear film and intraocular penetration of topical antibacterial agents is generally poor, necessitating intensive application for successful treatment of corneal infections. Therapeutic concentrations are rarely achieved at other sites in the eye. This article reviews what is known of the pharmacokinetics of topical ocular agents and how this information can be used to optimise ocular persistence and penetration and minimise systemic absorption of antibacterials. A review of the features of the most commonly employed topical antibacterials suggests that for the treatment of uncomplicated bacterial conjunctivitis there is little difference between the various agents in terms of clinical efficacy, although chloram-phenicol should be used with care because of its potential haematological toxicity. Carefully considered therapy is imperative for bacterial keratitis; fortified beta-lactam/aminoglycoside combinations are often used for these infections. The fluoroquinolones appear promising, but caution is necessary in treating keratitis of unknown aetiology with these agents alone because of inherent and emerging acquired resistance among Gram-positive bacteria.     

A multicenter efficacy and tolerability evaluation of benzoyl peroxide in a 10% urea vehicle for the treatment of acne vulgaris

BACKGROUND: Acne vulgaris is a common skin disease that affects 70 to 96% of individuals. Topical benzoyl peroxide has been used successfully for acne treatment; however, it may be accompanied by drying and or flaking skin. The addition of a 10% urea to the product excipient is theorized to moisturize the skin due to its humectant properties, aid in the efficacy of benzoyl peroxide due to its keratolytic properties, and effectively combat Propionibacterium acnes due to its antibacterial properties. OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and tolerability of the treatment of acne vulgaris with multiple strengths of benzoyl peroxide in a 10% urea vehicle gel or cream and cleanser. Methods: A multicenter, non-randomized, open-label study in which 1,089 patients with acne vulgaris were enrolled at 133 participating physician office sites. Qualifying and consenting patients were prescribed either 4.5% or 8.5% benzoyl peroxide in a 10% urea vehicle cream or gel and cleanser. Additional medications were permitted during the study with the exception of those containing benzoyl peroxide. The physician assessed lesion counts, both inflammatory and non-inflammatory, at baseline and Week 4. Dryness and erythema were rated by the physician on a scale from 0 (none) to 8 (severe or deep) at baseline and Week 4. RESULTS: Nine hundred sixty-three patients completed the study. The following significant treatment arms were analyzed: patients treated with 4.5%/8.5% benzoyl peroxide in a 10% urea vehicle product only, patients treated with 4.5%/8.5% benzoyl peroxide in a 10% urea vehicle products along with oral doxycycline, and patients treated with 4.5%/8.5% benzoyl peroxide in a 10% urea vehicle products along with oral minocycline. A 44% (n=567) mean reduction in total lesion count was observed after 4 weeks of treatment with 4.5%/8.5% benzoyl peroxide in a 10% urea vehicle products only. Dual therapy using oral doxycycline (n=17) proved to be even more effective with a significant mean reduction in lesion count of 52% after only 4 weeks of treatment. Dual therapy using oral minocycline (n=21) yielded a significant mean reduction in lesion count of 34% after 14 weeks of treatment. The overall tolerability of the treatment illustrated the utility of urea as a moisturizing agent. CONCLUSION: Benzoyl peroxide in a 10% urea vehicle gel or cream and cleanser, used once daily for 4 weeks was found to be both effective and well tolerated for the treatment of symptoms related to acne vulgaris.     

Nadifloxacin: a quinolone for topical treatment of skin infections and potential for systemic use of its active isomer, WCK 771

Nadifloxacin is a potent, broad-spectrum, quinolone agent approved for topical use in acne vulgaris and skin infections in Japan. As exposure of pathogenic and colonising bacteria to antibiotics results in drug resistance, it is not desirable to use an important, broad-spectrum antibiotic, which belongs to a class of agents widely used systemically to treat a wide variety of infections, as a topically applied preparation. On this basis, nadifloxacin is not a good option for topical treatment of acne when other effective non-antibiotic treatments are available. Nadifloxacin has potential as a topical agent for short-term treatment of skin infections. The arginine salt of its (-)-(S)-isomer is being developed as a parenteral agent based on its potency against methicillin and quinolone-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.     

Current concepts of the pathogenesis of acne: implications for drug treatment

The pathogenesis of acne is complex, with strong evidence supporting the involvement of sebaceous hyperplasia, follicular hyperkeratinisation, bacterial hypercolonisation, as well as immune reactions and inflammation. High sebum concentrations and follicular hyperkeratinisation lead to a change of the follicular milieu with consecutive proliferation of bacteria, chiefly Propionibacterium acnes. This leads to further increased production of the pro-inflammatory cytokines interleukin-1alpha and tumour necrosis factor alpha by T cells and keratinocytes, leading to proliferation of both cell types. Follicular keratinocytes fail to differentiate by apoptosis and produce hypergranulosis similar to the impermeable skin outer layer, resulting in the formation of microcomedones. Further inflammatory responses lead to the development of increasing degrees of severity in inflammatory forms of acne.Retinoids aid the differentiation and reduce the hyperproliferation of keratinocytes, and can inhibit the migration of leucocytes. Combination therapy using retinoids plus benzoyl peroxide or antibacterials can treat existing acne lesions faster than the individual agents alone and can also prevent the development of new lesions. The new retinoids (e.g. adapalene) have not only the typical potent comedolytic activity but also anti-inflammatory effects. When added to antibacterial therapy, topical retinoids demonstrate faster and significantly greater reduction of inflammatory acne lesions and comedones than antibacterials alone.     

我院2004～2006年抗菌药物使用与革兰阴性杆菌耐药趋势分析

目的:掌握我院2004～2006年抗菌药物的使用与临床分离革兰阴性杆菌的耐药趋势。方法:通过计算机程序调取住院药房15种抗菌药物的消耗数量,并计算用药频度(DDDs)。结果:3年中环丙沙星、左氧氟沙星、头孢曲松、庆大霉素用药频度最高;除头孢吡肟外,其它14种抗菌药物的DDDs均呈逐年下降趋势。碳青霉烯类仍是对大肠埃希菌和肺炎克雷伯菌抗菌活性最强的药物,但其对铜绿假单胞菌、鲍曼不动杆菌的耐药性正在增加;大肠埃希菌对用药频率高的喹诺酮类药物耐药性较高。结论:抗菌药物管理与临床应用需进一步规范,对细菌耐药应高度重视。