Shear bond strength of a new high fluoride release glass ionomer adhesive

OBJECTIVE: To determine the shear bond strength of a new resin glass ionomer adhesive with higher fluoride release properties when bonding orthodontic brackets. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty freshly extracted human molars were collected and stored in a solution of 0.1% (weight/volume) thymol. The teeth were cleaned and polished. The teeth were randomly separated into three groups according to the enamel conditioner/etchant and adhesive used. Group I: 20 teeth conditioned with 10% polyacrylic acid and brackets bonded with the new glass ionomer adhesive. Group II: 20 teeth conditioned with 37% phosphoric acid and brackets bonded with the new glass ionomer adhesive. Group III (control): 20 teeth etched with 37% phosphoric acid and brackets bonded with a composite adhesive. RESULTS: The results of the analysis of variance comparing the three experimental groups (F = 10.294) indicated the presence of significant differences between the three groups (P = .0001). The shear bond strengths were significantly lower in the two groups bonded with the new glass ionomer adhesive whether conditioned with polyacrylic acid ( x = 3.2 +/- 1.8 MPa) or phosphoric acid (x = 2.3 +/- 1.1 MPa), while the mean shear bond strength of the composite adhesive was 5.2 +/- 2.9 MPa. CONCLUSIONS: Although the increased fluoride release from the new glass ionomer has the potential of decreasing decalcification around orthodontic brackets, the shear bond strength of the material is relatively low.     

A fluoride-releasing composite for dental applications.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this work was to attempt formulation of a dental composite, for investigational purposes, which will release fluoride at a rate comparable to glass ionomer materials, while retaining physical properties adequate for potential use in a number of dental applications. METHODS: An organic fluoride material, tetrabutylammonium tetrafluoroborate (TBATFB), was incorporated into a hydrophilic monomer system made of 2,2-bis[4-(2-hydroxy-3-methacroyloxypropoxy)phenyl]-propane (BisGMA) and 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA). This fluoride-containing monomer system was filled with silane treated quartz to 81 wt%. The resultant material was tested for fluoride release, physical strength properties and bond strength to enamel, each in comparison to control materials. RESULTS: Cumulative fluoride release from the experimental composite was approximately linear over time and comparable to glass ionomer materials. The long term rate of release exceeded several of the glass ionomer materials tested. Diametral tensile strength was comparable to resin-modified glass ionomer (RMGI) materials. Bond strength to etched enamel was statistically equivalent to a commercially available hybrid composite control. SIGNIFICANCE: The experimental resin-based composite material could potentially be used as an alternative to glass ionomer materials in non-stress bearing restorative applications and for orthodontic bracket bonding, where high fluoride release is desirable.     

Evaluation of a new 2-paste glass ionomer cement

A new 2-paste resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement, Fuji Ortho Band Paste Pak (GC Corporation, Tokyo, Japan), for the placement of orthodontic bands, has been developed for easier handling. The aim of this study was to compare the fluoride release and uptake characteristics of this cement with that of 3 others commonly used to cement orthodontic bands: a conventional resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement, a polyacid-modified composite resin, and a conventional glass ionomer cement. Fluoride release was measured during a 28-day period. After the measurement on day 28, experimental samples were exposed to 1000 ppm sodium fluoride solution for 5 minutes, and fluoride release was then measured for 7 days. Initially, the new 2-paste resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement released the greatest amount of fluoride; the polyacid-modified composite resin released the least initially, and it continued to show the lowest values throughout the study. The fluoride uptake and release values of the new 2-paste resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement were statistically significantly higher than those of the conventional resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement or the conventional glass ionomer cement. The new 2-paste resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement might be a good alternative to conventional products for cementing orthodontic bands.     

In vitro study of 24-hour and 30-day shear bond strengths of three resin–glass ionomer cements used to bond orthodontic brackets

Interest in using composite resin–glass ionomer hybrid cements as orthodontic bracket adhesives has grown because of their potential for fluoride release. The purpose of this pilot study was to compare shear bond strengths of three resin–glass ionomer cements (Advance, Fuji Duet, Fuji Ortho LC) used as bracket adhesives with a composite resin 24 hours and 30 days after bonding. The amount of adhesive remaining on the debonded enamel surface was scored for each adhesive. Mesh-backed stainless-steel brackets were bonded to 100 extracted human premolars, which were stored in artificial saliva at 37° C until being tested to failure in a testing machine. The hybrid cements, with one exception, had bond strengths similar to those of the composite resin at 24 hours and 30 days. Fuji Ortho LC had significantly lower bond strengths (ANOVA p ≤ 0.05) than the other adhesives at 24 hours and 30 days when it was bonded to unetched, water-moistened enamel. Adhesive-remnant scores were similar for all cements, except for cement Fuji Ortho LC when it was bonded to unetched enamel. The resin–glass ionomer cements we tested appear to have bond strengths suitable for routine use as orthodontic bracket–bonding adhesives. (Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998;113:620-24.)     

树脂加强型玻璃离子水门汀临床初步应用的研究

目的了解树脂加强型玻璃离子水门汀在临床使用的脱落率,探讨树脂加强型玻璃离子水门汀在临床使用的可行性.方法20名正畸初诊患者的上颌左右侧分别使用正畸用树脂加强型玻璃离子水门汀,复合树脂型正畸釉质粘结剂粘结正畸托槽,观察其临床脱落率.结果树脂加强型玻璃离子水门汀粘结托槽的脱落率与临床普遍使用的复合树脂型正畸釉质粘结剂粘结托槽的脱落率相似.结论树脂加强型玻璃离子水门汀可以满足临床需要.     

Fluoride release from restorative materials and a luting cement

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: In addition to conventional glass ionomers, a considerable number of different types of materials have been formulated to release fluoride. Variation in composition results in quantitative differences in the amount of fluoride release by these materials. PURPOSE: This study evaluated and compared fluoride release in distilled water from different types of restorative materials and a luting cement. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Fluoride release from 4 glass ionomer formulation restorative materials (Miracle-Mix, Fuji ionomer type III, Fuji II LC improved, and Ketac-Silver), a luting cement (Ketac Cem), a compomer (Compoglass Flow), 2 sealants (Fissurit F, Helioseal F), and a composite resin (Tetric) was evaluated at time intervals of 4, 8, 12, and 24 hours and 2, 3, 7, 14, 28, 56, and 112 days. Seven disks of each material were made and stored for equilibration in double distilled water at 37 degrees C for the time of each measurement. The equilibrated solution was analyzed for fluoride with a TISAB and an ion-specific combination electrode (ORION 960900) connected to an expandable ion analyzer (Crison micropH 2002). Data were analyzed by means of univariate analysis of variance, the Dunnett C post hoc test, and repeated measures analysis. RESULTS: Fluoride was released from all the evaluated materials, with considerable variation in the rate of release but a similar pattern. Among the materials tested, fluoride release from glass ionomer formulations was greater than that from composite resin formulations; the rank of decreasing order was as follows: Miracle Mix > Fuji III, Ketac Cem > Fuji II LC > Ketac Silver, Compoglass F > Fissurit F, Helioseal F > Tetric (> indicates statistical significance; P< .05). CONCLUSION: Under the conditions of this study, glass ionomer formulations and the compomer released more fluoride than the sealants and the composite resin tested.     

四种玻璃离子充填材料释氟性与溶解性的研究

目的 比较4种玻璃离子充填材料短期内氟离子释放能力和溶解性,为临床选择充填材料提供依据.方法 实验选取1种传统型玻璃离子水门汀(SC),2种高强度玻璃离子水门汀FujiⅨ(F9)和Ketac Moler(KM),1种树脂改良型玻璃离子水门汀FujiIILC (F2LC),和1种复合树脂Z100( CR,3M)共5种材...     

Antibacterial and mechanical properties of restorative materials combined with chlorhexidines

Chorhexidine gluconate or chlorhexidine dihydrochloride were added to a composite resin and a glass ionomer restorative material in concentrations of 0, 1, 2, 3, 5, and 10% by weight. Antibacterial activity was measured by inhibition of growth of S. viridans, S. pyogenes, S. mutans, L. acidophilus, and E. coli, for 4 days. Compressive, tensile, and restorative material-enamel adhesive shear strength tests were performed. The addition of chlorhexidine gluconate or chlorhexidine dihydrochloride increased the antibacterial activity of the composite resin and the glass ionomer restorative material and changed the mechanical properties of the restorative materials. The addition of chlorhexidine dihydrochloride resulted in mechanical properties closest to controls.     

树脂加强型玻璃离子正畸粘接剂的研究进展

树脂加强型玻璃离子正畸粘接剂作为一种新型的正畸粘接材料,结合了传统玻璃离子和复合树脂的优点,是当今国内外的研究热点之一.本文就树脂加强型玻璃离子正畸粘接剂的粘接性能、预防釉质脱矿、释氟性、抑菌性等作一综述.     

Effect of using self-etching primer for bonding orthodontic brackets

Questions over the use of self-etching primers with composite resin adhesives in the bonding of orthodontic brackets remain unsolved. In addition, there are no previous reports on the efficacy of self-etching primers with resin-modified glass ionomer cements for bonding orthodontic brackets in orthodontic dentistry. The purpose of this study was to determine the shear bond strengths of orthodontic brackets bonded with one of four protocols: (1) a composite resin adhesive used with 40% phosphoric acid, (2) the same composite resin used with Megabond self-etching primer, (3) a resin-modified glass ionomer cement adhesive used with 10% polyacrylic acid enamel conditioner, and (4) the same resin-modified glass ionomer cement used with Megabond self-etching primer. The appearance of the tooth surfaces after acid etching or priming was observed with a field-emission scanning electron microscope (FE-SEM). When used with resin-modified glass ionomer cement, Megabond self-etching primer gave no significantly different shear bond strength compared with polyacrylic acid etching. But when used with composite resin adhesive, Megabond self-etching primer gave significantly lower shear bond strength than phosphoric acid etching. However, the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded with composite resin adhesive after Megabond priming was almost the same as that of brackets bonded with resin-modified glass ionomer cement after polyacrylic acid etching. FE-SEM observation revealed that Megabond self-etching primer produced less dissolution of enamel surface than did phosphoric acid and polyacrylic acid etching. Megabond self-etching primer may be a candidate for bonding orthodontic brackets using the resin-modified glass ionomer cement for minimizing the amount of enamel loss.     

Microleakage of high-strength glass ionomer: resin composite restorations in minimally invasive treatment

Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART) has been investigated as an alternative caries treatment. The technique involves removal of loose tooth structure with a spoon excavator, followed by placement of an adhesive restorative material, often a high-strength glass ionomer. This study compares the microleakage of a high-strength glass ionomer/resin composite and two occlusal resin composite restoration techniques.     

A clinical comparison of glass ionomer,resin-modified glass ionomer and resin composite restorations in the treatment of cervical caries in xerostomic head and neck radiation patients

Controversy exists as to whether there is less secondary caries at the margins of glass ionomer restorations compared with other materials that do not release fluoride. This study examined the incidence of secondary caries for three types of restorative materials in Class V restorations in xerostomic patients. The study group consisted of 45 high caries-risk adult patients who had undergone head and neck irradiation for the treatment of cancer. All were substantially xerostomic and in need of at least three restorations in the same arch. Every patient received a restoration with each of the test materials, a conventional glass ionomer (GI), a resin modified glass ionomer (RMGI) and a resin composite (C). Patients were instructed in the daily use of a neutral pH sodium fluoride gel in custom trays. Recall appointments were made at 6, 12, 18 and 24 months, and the restorations were examined for material loss, marginal integrity and recurrent caries at the restoration margin. Fluoride compliance was determined at each recall period and recorded as the percentage of recommended use during that interval. Patients were categorized at the end of the study as fluoride non-users if their average compliance was 50% or less. Those with greater than 50% compliance were categorized as fluoride users. In the latter group, no recurrent caries was found for any of the restorations, whereas a material-dependent incidence of recurrent caries was found in the fluoride non-user group. None of the GI, one RMGI and eight C restorations failed due to recurrent caries. For the fluoride non-user patients, Fishers exact test (p=0.05) showed no statistical difference between GI and RMGI but statistical differences were found among those materials and resin composite at each recall period. Recurrent caries reductions for GI and RMGI relative to C were greater than 80% in xerostomic patients not using topical fluoride supplementation.     

Restorations of eroded areas

Class V erosion lesions must be restored to reinstate esthetic appearance, overcome sensitivity, or prevent further loss of tooth structure. Restoration has been a problem, but, with the advent of adhesive techniques, it is far less traumatic. The most widely advocated method currently uses composite resin as the primary restorative material with dentin bonding agents. Type III glass ionomer lining cements are also suggested to provide bonding to the dentin. This paper details the requirements for clinical success in the restoration of the Class V erosion lesion using Type II restorative esthetic glass ionomer cements as the primary restorative material with the possible addition of composite resin as a final veneer only if circumstances warrant it.     

Sensitivity restored of Class V abrasion/erosion lesions

The effectiveness of restorative treatment in reducing sensitivity associated with the Class V erosion/abrasion lesion was evaluated and the efficacy of three tooth-colored restorative materials in reducing sensitivity was compared. The 108 lesions were restored with either glass ionomer restorative material, composite resin with a dentin bonding agent, or composite resin with a dentin bonding agent and a glass ionomer liner. Composite resin with glass-ionomer liner restorations significantly reduced sensitivity to air and hot and cold water. Glass ionomer restorations and restorations with composite resin and a dentin bonding agent significantly reduced sensitivity but were also associated with increased sensitivity to air and cold respectively in 20% to 30% of the lesions restored when evaluated at 6 months.     

Fluoride release from a new glass-ionomer cement

This study compared the amount and pattern of fluoride release from a new glass-ionomer-based material (nano-ionomer) with other restorative materials and correlated the surface area to volume of nano-sized filler with its capacity to release fluoride in the powder, more quickly increasing the fluoride. The materials evaluated were a nano-ionomer (Ketac N 100), a conventional glass-ionomer cement (GC Fuji II), a resin-modified glass ionomer cement (GC Fuji II LC), a compomer (Dyract F) and a fluoride-releasing resin composite (Tetric N Flow). A resin composite (Synergy Flow) served as the control. Ten specimens were fabricated from each of these materials using a customized metal mold. The fluoride release was measured every 24 hours for the first seven days, and on days 14, 21 and 28, a combination fluoride ion—selective electrode connected to an ion analyzer. The data was analyzed by one-way ANOVA and Tukey HSD test (p=0.05). An initial fluoride “burst effect” was seen with all of the materials, except for the control and compomer. The conventional glass-ionomer cement showed the highest fluoride release on the first three days. The nano-ionomer showed the maximum release of fluoride for the remaining days. A low constant level of fluoride release was seen from the compomer and fluoride-releasing resin composite throughout the study period.     

Effects of temperature on the fluoride release and recharging ability of glass ionomers

This study investigated the effects of environmental temperature on the fluoride release and recharging ability of glass ionomers. Five disk specimens (15 mm in diameter and 1 mm thick) were made of each of the following materials: a conventional luting glass ionomer, two high viscosity restorative glass ionomers and a restorative resin-modified glass ionomer. The fluoride release of each material was measured at 4 degrees C, 37 degrees C and 55 degrees C. An additional three groups, which were made of the same materials, were stored in distilled and deionized water for 30 days and recharged in 250 ppm fluoride solution at 4 degrees C, 37 degrees C and 55 degrees C for five minutes. The fluoride re-release was measured daily from two days prior to two days after the recharging process. At all temperatures, the luting glass ionomers showed the greatest fluoride release and recharging ability, followed by the resin-modified glass ionomer, then the high viscosity glass ionomers. For each material, the fluoride release increased with increasing temperature and all glass ionomers showed greater recharging ability at higher temperatures. An increase in environmental temperature increased both the fluoride release and recharging of the glass ionomers. This may be important in developing regimes for improving the delivery of topical fluoride products.     

Surface roughness and weight loss of esthetic restorative materials related to fluoride release and uptake.

The objective of this study was to assess the surface roughness of eight esthetic restorative materials and the relationship with weight changes during fluoride release and uptake. Five specimens each of ChemFil Superior, Fuji IX Dyract, Fuji II LC, Vitremer, Photac-Fil, Ketac-Silver, and Z100 (control) were prepared and immersed in 2 ml of artificial saliva at 37 degrees C. The changes in specimen weight and fluoride release were monitored for 12 weeks. This protocol was repeated after recharging the specimens with 1.23% APF gel for 12 more weeks. The immersed and fresh specimens for each material were then examined with SEM and surface profilometry. There was a significant weight loss for all glass ionomer cements following APF gel application (P < 0.01), which correlated with fluoride release (r = 0.89-0.98). Mean roughness (Ra) measurements and SEM showed that roughness increased from the resin composite to the conventional glass ionomer cements. The marked erosive effect of APF gel on glass ionomer restorations could increase surface colonization by plaque micro-organisms, and reduce the longevity of the restorations.     

不同充填材料治疗老年人根面龋的临床观察

目的 探讨治疗老年人根面龋的理想充填材料.方法 328 颗患牙随机分为三组,分别用富士 9 玻璃离子、银粉玻璃离子和光固化复合树脂充填修复.随访12～18个月.结果 富士9 玻璃离子修复成功率为90.91%,高于光固化复合树脂组(76.29%,P<0.05),与银粉玻璃离子组(89.09%)差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).富士 9 玻璃离子充填老年人根面龋者,无一例继发龋及微渗漏发生.结论 在老年人根面龋的治疗中,富士 9 玻璃离子和银粉玻璃离子疗效优于光固化复合树脂.富士 9 玻璃离子临床操作更具有便利性,为老年人根面龋较理想的充填材料.     

Effect of brushing on fluoride release from 3 bracket adhesives.

The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare fluoride ion release from 3 orthodontic bracket adhesives with and without brushing the bracketed teeth with a fluoridated dentifrice. The bracket adhesives included a light-cured composite resin (Transbond; 3M Unitek, Monrovia, Calif), a fluoride-releasing composite resin (Advance; L D Caulk Division, Dentsply International, Milford, Del), and a resin-modified glass ionomer (Fuji Ortho LC; GC America, Alsip, Ill). The teeth in the control group were not bonded with brackets. Sixty extracted human teeth were randomly assigned to 6 groups of 10 each: (1) Transbond, brushed; (2) Advance, brushed; (3) Advance, not brushed; (4) Fuji, brushed; (5) Fuji, not brushed; and (6) control, brushed. After bonding, each tooth was placed in a sealed plastic test tube containing 4 ml of deionized water. The toothpaste used in brushing contained 0.15% weight per volume sodium fluoride, 1500 parts per million parts fluoride (Winter-fresh gel; Colgate-Palmolive Co., New York, NY). Brushing began 24 hours after the teeth were bonded and placed in deionized water. After brushing, the teeth were thoroughly rinsed with deionized water and returned to a sealed test tube. Fluoride measurements were taken before brushing began, at intervals of 72 hours for 22 days, and 90 and 93 days after bonding. Findings included: (1) brushing significantly increased the release of fluoride ions from the teeth in the composite resin and control groups, (2) the enamel crowns of the unbonded control teeth absorbed and re-released a substantial amount of fluoride ions obtained from the toothpaste, (3) the brushed group of teeth bonded with the fluoride-releasing composite resin released significantly more fluoride on the last 4 days that measurements were taken after brushing than the nonbrushed group bonded with the same adhesive, (4) the brushed group of teeth bonded with the resin-modified glass ionomer released significantly more fluoride on the last 4 days that measurements were taken after brushing than the nonbrushed group bonded with the same adhesive, and (5) all groups released small amounts of fluoride ions 90 and 93 days after bonding (68.5 and 71.5 days after brushing ended); the resin-modified glass ionomer groups released significantly more fluoride than the other groups. Brushing with fluoridated toothpaste produced significantly greater fluoride release from teeth bonded with all 3 adhesives, and from the unbonded control teeth.     

A 12-month clinical evaluation of a glass polyalkenoate cement for the direct bonding of orthodontic brackets.

Glass polyalkenoate (ionomer) cements have the unique properties to physicochemically bond to enamel and base metals, and to leach fluoride over prolonged periods. These cements are hybrids of silicate and polycarboxylate cements and, like the silicate cements, retain a cariostatic action on adjacent enamel. This article reports on a 12-month clinical trial of a glass ionomer cement for the direct bonding of orthodontic brackets compared with a standard composite bonding adhesive. This study shows a significant difference in failure rates of direct-bonded orthodontic brackets cemented with a thick mix of Fuji I glass polyalkenoate cement (20%) compared with System I+ composite bonding resin (5%).