Decreasing efficacy of repeated intravitreal triamcinolone injections in diabetic macular oedema

BACKGROUND/AIM: Intravitreal triamcinolone (IVTA) results in transient improvements in diabetic macular oedema (DMO), necessitating repeated injections. The authors report a case series of 10 eyes of 10 patients with DMO, who received a repeat injection of 4 mg IVTA, at least 26 weeks after the first injection of the same dose. METHOD: Pre-injection and at 2, 4, 9, and 17 weeks post-injection, best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central foveal thickness (CFT) on optical coherence tomography, after the first and repeat injections, were compared using paired t test. Side effects were monitored. RESULTS: BCVA, CFT, intraocular pressure (IOP), and cataract scores were not significantly different before initial and repeat injections (given at 32.5 (SD 3.5) weeks after the first injection). Transient improvements of BCVA and CFT were achieved after both injections. However, after the repeat injection, the BCVA was significantly worse at all time points (p<0.05) and so were the best achieved CFT and the CFT at 4 weeks post-injection (p = 0.034 and 0.011 respectively), compared with the initial injection. Post-injection maximum IOPs and increase in cataract scores were not significantly different between the two injections. CONCLUSION: A repeat injection of 4 mg of IVTA may not be as effective as an initial injection for the treatment of DMO.     

Full-thickness macular hole in a patient with diabetic cystoid macular oedema treated by intravitreal triamcinolone injections

PURPOSE: Full-thickness macular hole associated with diabetic macular oedema is a rare feature and its pathogenesis remains incompletely elucidated. We report the occurrence of a full-thickness macular hole, documented with optical coherence tomography (OCT), in a patient with diabetic cystoid macular oedema treated by intravitreal triamcinolone injections. CASE REPORT: A 48-year-old woman with refractory diabetic cystoid macular oedema underwent successive intravitreal triamcinolone injections, which were followed by a progressive thinning of the neurosensory retina at the fovea, and then by a full-thickness macular hole, associated with a perifoveal posterior hyaloid detachment, visible on OCT. During pars plana vitrectomy, a thin epiretinal macular membrane was diagnosed and removed. DISCUSSION: Pathogenesis of the present full-thickness macular hole associated with diabetic macular oedema is different from that of idiopathic macular holes because anteroposterior vitreous tractions were not involved in its formation. Recurrent intravitreal triamcinolone injections may have had an indirect role in the development of the macular hole, by favouring the rupture of distended Muller cells and intraretinal pseudocysts.     

The effect of intravitreal triamcinolone on diabetic macular oedema

Background Diabetic macular oedema is a frequent cause of visual loss in patients with diabetic retinopathy. The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide in reducing diabetic macular oedema and improving visual acuity.Methods In this prospective study 12 eyes of 12 patients with diabetic macular oedema unresponsive to prior laser treatment received an intravitreal injection of 4 mg triamcinolone acetonide. Examinations were performed 1 day preoperatively and at 1 week and 1, 3, 6, and 9 months after surgery and included slit-lamp examination, measurement of IOP, assessment of distance as well as reading visual acuity and assessment of macular thickness using optical coherence tomography (OCT).Results Mean age of the patients (mean±SD) was 66.6±8.6 years. Mean best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) for distance (LogMAR using ETDRS charts) improved from 1.0±0.4 preoperatively to 0.9±0.4 (p=0.01) 1 week and to 0.9±0.4 (p=0.02) 1 month postoperatively. Mean BCVA for reading vision (LogRAD using Radner Reading Charts) improved from 1.1±0.4 preoperatively to 0.9±0.4 (p=0.002) 1 month postoperatively. Mean macular thickness decreased from 450±190 (m) preoperatively to 305±153 (p=0.02) 1 month postoperatively. No significant improvement in VA and no significant reduction of macular thickness could be observed 3, 6, and 9 months postoperatively. Mean intraocular pressure significantly increased from 14.7±2.7 mmHg preoperatively to 16.9±3.0 mmHg at 1 month (p=0.02).Conclusion A single intravitreal injection of triamcinolone acetonide led to a significant improvement in mean VA in patients with diabetic macular oedema. However, the significant effect was not permanent and persisted for only 1 month.The study was carried out at the Medical University of Vienna, Department of Ophthalmology, Austria. The authors have no proprietary or financial interest in any product mentioned in this article and received no financial support for this study.     

Loss of visual function after repeated intravitreal injections of triamcinolone acetonide in refractory uveitic macular oedema

Purpose The effects of intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide on macular oedema have been evaluated in many studies. Good short-time effects are usually reported on visual function and macular oedema. However, adverse events like intraocular hypertension and cataract formation have been described in humans, and retinal toxicity is found in experimental studies. Case report We report on a 56-year-old male patient with a bilateral macular oedema in idiopathic intermediate uveitis, treated with two and six intravitreal injections of triamcinolone acetonide, respectively, and followed for 6 years. Results The macular oedema disappeared after each intravitreal injection, but each time it recidivated some months later. Visual acuity improved only after the first injections. After six intravitreal injections, visual acuity was limited to counting fingers in the absence of macular oedema. OCT and ERG results show central and peripheral retinal damage that could be a consequence of a retinotoxic property of triamcinolone acetonide. Conclusion Repeated intravitreal injection of triamcinolone acetonide does not show any long-term efficacy on uveitic macular oedema and can even lead to irreversible global retinal damage.     

Refractive changes after intravitreal ranibizumab injections for diabetic macular oedema

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to evaluate refractive changes after intravitreal ranibizumab injections for the treatment of diabetic macular oedema.

Methods

Participants in this retrospective study were 35 patients (35 eyes) with diabetic macular oedema, who received intravitreal ranibizumab injections. Spherical equivalent refractive power was evaluated before treatment and at least one month after the last injection where no fluid existed. Demographic characteristics, visual acuity, central retinal thickness and the number of injections were recorded and analysed.

Results

The spherical equivalent refractive power did not differ significantly pre‐ or post‐injections. Changes in visual acuity and central retinal thickness were statistically significant before and after injections.

Conclusions

Intravitreal ranibizumab injections did not seem to affect the refractive power of patients with diabetic macular oedema. Therefore, appropriate spectacle correction can be prescribed any time during ongoing treatment with ranibizumab injections.

     

Macular function after intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide injection for diabetic macular oedema

Purpose: We aimed to evaluate the effect of intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide (IVTA) on macular function in patients with diabetic macular oedema (DMO). Methods: Eleven eyes in 11 patients with DMO were enrolled. In each eye, at baseline and at 30 days after IVTA injection, logMAR visual acuity (VA), macular sensitivity, fixation stability and fixation location by MP‐1 microperimetry and optical coherence tomography (OCT) foveal thickness were assessed. Results: Thirty days after IVTA injection, eyes with DMO showed a significant (p < 0.001) reduction in foveal thickness and significant (p < 0.01) increases in logMAR VA and MP‐1 retinal sensitivity (p < 0.001). There was also significant (p = 0.046) improvement in fixation location and some improvement in fixation stability, although the latter was not significant (p = 0.08). Conclusions: In eyes with DMO, short‐term improvement in retinal sensitivity and fixation properties can be achieved by IVTA injection.     

Efficacy and safety of one intravitreal injection of bevacizumab in diabetic macular oedema

Purpose: To assess the efficacy, duration of effect and safety of one intravitreal injection of bevacizumab in diabetic macular oedema (DMO). Methods: Bevacizumab (1 mg/0.04 ml) was injected intravitreally into eyes with DMO (29 with and nine without previous treatments). Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), intraocular pressure and central retinal thickness (CRT) were measured; slit‐lamp examination, macular biomicroscopy, optical coherence tomography and fluorescein angiography were performed before and at 2–4, 8 and 12 weeks post‐injection. Best corrected VA and CRT were analysed in both groups. Results: In the non‐pretreated group, mean BCVA improved from 0.76 ± 0.33 (baseline) to 0.57 ± 0.30 and 0.54 ± 0.27 at 2–4 weeks and 8 weeks post‐injection, respectively (p = 0.02, p = 0.014, paired t‐test). Mean CRT decreased from 632.4 ± 196.0 μm (baseline) to 392.3 ± 113.6 μm and 370.4 ± 141.7 μm at the same time‐points, respectively (p = 0.01, p = 0.01). There was no difference in BCVA or CRT at 12 weeks. In the pretreated group, mean BCVA improved from 0.62 ± 0.30 (baseline) to 0.53 ± 0.33 at 2–4 weeks post‐injection (p = 0.01), and mean CRT decreased from 583.9 ± 180.7 μm (baseline) to 404.1 ± 197.9 μm at 2–4 weeks post‐injection (p < 0.001). Mean BCVA was unchanged at 8 weeks and 12 weeks post‐injection, although mean CRT remained lower at 8 weeks (p = 0.004). No ocular or systemic side‐effects developed during follow‐up. Conclusions: One intravitreal injection of bevacizumab for DMO seems to be effective and safe in both eyes that have been treated previously and eyes that have not. The therapeutic effect is temporary and repeat treatment may be needed.     

Dosage dependency of intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide as treatment for diabetic macular oedema

AIM: To evaluate the effect of different doses of intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide on diffuse diabetic macular oedema. METHODS: The prospective, randomised, double masked, clinical interventional study included 27 eyes (27 patients) with diffuse diabetic macular oedema. They were randomly divided into three study groups receiving an intravitreal injection of filtered triamcinolone acetonide of about 2 mg (n = 8 eyes), 5 mg (n = 10), or 13 mg (n = 9), respectively. Dosage measurement was performed before filtration. Mean follow up was 6.6 (SD 2.4) months (3-12 months). Main outcome measures were visual acuity and intraocular pressure. RESULTS: Maximal increase in visual acuity was significantly (p = 0.046; 95% CI: 0.032 to 2.99; r = 0.38) correlated with the dosage of intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide. Additionally, the duration of the effect of intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide increased significantly with the dosage of intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide (r = 0.45; p = 0.014). Increase in intraocular pressure during follow up was statistically not significantly associated with the dosage used (p = 0.77). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with diffuse diabetic macular oedema receiving intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide, treatment response may last longer and be more pronounced with a dosage of 13 mg than in lower doses of 5 mg or 2 mg. Triamcinolone acetonide induced increase in intraocular pressure may not be markedly associated with the dosage used.     

Improved visual acuity and macular thickness 1 week after intravitreal triamcinolone for diabetic macular oedema

PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical and volumetric improvement 1 week after an injection of intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide in eyes with diabetic macular oedema. METHODS: Seven phakic eyes of seven diabetic patients diagnosed with clinically significant macular oedema were treated with a single 4-mg intravitreal injection of triamcinolone acetonide (0.1 ml). LogMAR best corrected visual acuity (logMAR BCVA), best corrected reading ability (RA), and central macular thickness (CMT) with optical coherence tomography (OCT) were assessed prior and 1 week subsequent to treatment. RESULTS: Mean improvement in logMAR BCVA was 0.146 (P=0.03). Mean reduction in CMT was 150.9 mum (P=0.02, Wilcoxon signed-rank test). Mean improvement in RA was 3 lines. CONCLUSION: Reduction in macular oedema was demonstrated on OCT at 1 week, in most cases associated with improvement in central visual function, in particular, reading ability. Total resolution of diabetic macular oedema may occur at 1 week following intravitreal steroid injection.     

二次玻璃体腔注射曲安奈德治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿

目的:探讨二次玻璃体腔注射曲安奈德治疗糖尿病黄斑水肿的疗效。方法:治疗组在首次玻璃体腔注射曲安奈德平均3.6mo后二次注射。对照组玻璃体腔只注射一次曲安奈德,两组注射剂量均为20mg,并辅助维生素类、烟酸酯和达纳康、弥可保等口服。在指定观察期内进行疗效对比。结果:治疗组视力平均提高0.32±0.19,对照组视力平均提高0.17±0.14,两者存在显著性差异(t=3.251,P<0.05)。结论:糖尿病黄斑水肿经过二次玻璃体腔注射曲安奈德后能够产生良好的疗效。     

A prospective randomised trial of different doses of intravitreal triamcinolone for diabetic macular oedema

OBJECTIVE: To compare the safety and efficacy of different doses of intravitreal triamcinolone (ivTA) in treating clinically significant diabetic macular oedema (CSMO). METHODS: 63 eyes of 63 patients with CSMO and central foveal thickness (CFT) of > or =250 microm on optical coherence tomography were randomised to receive 4 mg (n = 23), 6 mg (n = 20) or 8 mg (n = 20) ivTA. Patients were followed up for 6 months, and changes in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), optical coherence tomography CFT, standardised change in macular thickness (SCMT), and side effects such as intraocular pressure and cataractogenesis were compared between the three groups. RESULTS: After ivTA injection, improvements of BCVA and CFT occurred in all groups. The mean BCVA improvement at 6 months was significantly higher for the 8 mg group compared with the 4 mg group, with 9.9 and 3.1 improvement in letters on the Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study chart, respectively (p = 0.047). The mean SCMT at 6 months for the 4, 6 and 8 mg groups was 28.7%, 42.3% and 60.5%, respectively (p = 0.06). The proportion of eyes with SCMT > or =75% at 6 months was higher in the 8 mg group, but the difference failed to reach significance (p = 0.06). Ocular hypertensive responses (>21 mm Hg) occurred in 39%, 30% and 55% of eyes in the 4, 6, and 8 mg groups, respectively (p = 0.27). CONCLUSIONS: Higher doses of ivTA may prolong the duration of visual benefit in diabetic CSMO and seemed to result in more sustained reduction in macular oedema. Further studies are warranted to investigate the optimum dose of ivTA in treating diabetic CSMO.     

Intravitreal triamcinolone for diffuse diabetic macular oedema

AIM: To evaluate the efficacy of intravitreal triamcinolone (IVTA) for the treatment of diffuse diabetic macular oedema (DME) refractory to conventional argon macular laser therapy. METHODS: A prospective, consecutive, and noncomparative case series was undertaken involving 38 eyes of 38 patients with refractory DME. Triamcinolone acetonide (4 mg) in 0.1 ml was injected intravitreally. LogMar visual acuity (VA) and macular thickness measured by ocular coherence tomography (OCT) were assessed preoperatively and postoperatively at 1, 3, and 6 months. RESULTS: All patients completed 6 months of follow up. VA (mean+/-SD) improved from 0.905+/-0.23 to 0.605+/-0.28, 0.555+/-0.29, and 0.730+/-0.30 at 1, 3, and 6 months, respectively. Macular thickness baseline (mean+/-SD) on OCT was 418.7+/-104.2 microm and this decreased to 276.9+/-72.6 microm, 250.6+/-53.1 microm, and 308.8+/-87.3 microm at 1, 3, and 6 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: IVTA may be a potential temporary treatment for refractory DME. It is effective in decreasing macular thickness and improving VA but the effect lasts approximately for 6 months in the majority of patients. Further investigations are required to establish the safety of IVTA for the treatment of DME.