Effectiveness of laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy to treat residual refractive errors after laser in situ keratomileusis

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effectiveness of laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy (LASEK) to treat residual refractive errors after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). SETTINGS: Isik Eye Clinic, Ankara, Turkey. METHODS: This retrospective study included 24 eyes of 15 patients who had retreatment by LASEK for residual refractive errors after myopic LASIK. All patients had examinations that included slitlamp biomicroscopy, subjective and cycloplegic refractions, uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best corrected visual acuity, corneal topography, and pachymetry preoperatively and postoperatively. Postoperative examinations were performed at 1 week and 1, 3, and 6 months. RESULTS: The patient cohort comprised 9 men and 6 women. The median spherical equivalent (SE) of attempted correction for retreatment with LASEK was -1.25 diopters (D). The median follow-up after LASEK was 11.5 months (range 6 to 16 months). At the end of the follow-up, the median SE of the refractive error was -0.38 D. The median UCVA increased from 20/45 before LASEK to 20/25 at the last follow-up visit, which was statistically significant (P<.001). After LASEK, significant postoperative haze developed in 5 eyes. In all 5 eyes, the estimated ablation depth was more than 40 mum and the SE of attempted correction was -2.00 D or greater. CONCLUSIONS: Laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy retreatment in eyes with myopic regression after LASIK resulted in a significant improvement in UCVA that was comparable to the improvement after flap lifting. An SE of attempted correction greater than -2.00 D was associated with a significant rate of haze.     

Laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy for low to high myopia and astigmatism

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy (LASEK) for the treatment of low to high myopia and astigmatism. SETTING: Solo private practice, Mountain View, California, USA. METHODS: Laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy was performed in 146 eyes of 83 consecutive patients with myopia or myopic astigmatism using a VISX Star S2 excimer laser (72 eyes) or a Nidek EC-5000 excimer laser (74 eyes). The mean preoperative myopic spherical equivalent was -5.32 diopters (D) (range -1.25 to -14.38 D). Data were collected prospectively with a follow-up of 1 to 12 months. Outcome measurements included uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), manifest refraction, best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), corneal haze, and complications. RESULTS: After 6 and 12 months, no eye lost 2 or more lines of BSCVA. After 6 months, the UCVA was 20/20 in 57% of eyes and 20/40 or better in 96%. After 12 months, it was 20/20 in 56% of eyes and 20/40 or better in 96%. No eye developed corneal haze that affected visual acuity. There were no serious or vision-threatening complications. CONCLUSIONS: Laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy was safe and effective in treating a wide range of myopia and astigmatism. The potential advantages of LASEK over laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) include the elimination of stromal flap complications and greater choice in patient selection. The disadvantages include varying degrees of pain for 2 days and blurry vision for several days postoperatively.     

Laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy in children

PURPOSE: To evaluate whether laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy (LASEK) achieves effective targeted myopic correction with less post-treatment corneal haze than observed with photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) in children who fail traditional forms of treatment for myopic anisometropic amblyopia and high myopia. SETTING: Nonhospital surgical facility with follow-up in a hospital clinic setting. METHODS: This prospective study comprised 36 eyes of 25 patients. The mean patient age at treatment was 8.27 years (range 1.0 to 17.4 years). Patients were divided into 3 groups: those with myopic anisometropic amblyopia (13 patients/13 eyes), those with bilateral high myopia (11 patients/22 eyes), and those with high myopia post-penetrating keratoplasty (1 patient/1 eye). All patients were treated with LASEK under general anesthesia using the Visx 20/20 B excimer laser and a multizone, multipass ablation technique. Although the myopia was as high as -22.00 diopters (D) spherical equivalent (SE) in some eyes, no eye was treated for more than -19.00 D SE. RESULTS: At 1 year, the mean SE decreased from -8.03 D to -1.19 D. Forty-four percent of eyes were within +/-1.0 D of the targeted correction; 78% of eyes had clear corneas with no haze. In the entire group, the mean best corrected visual acuity improved from 20/80 to 20/50. A functional-vision survey demonstrated a positive effect on the patients' ability to function in their environments after LASEK. CONCLUSIONS: Laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy in children represents another method of providing long-term resolution of bilateral high myopia and myopic anisometropic amblyopia with minimal post-laser haze. The reduction in post-laser haze with LASEK compared to that with the standard PRK technique may represent an advantage in treating these complex patients.     

Laser in situ keratomileusis versus surface ablation: visual outcomes and complications

PURPOSE: To compare the visual outcomes and complications of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) with those of surface treatment by laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy (LASEK), photorefractive keratectomy with mechanical epithelial removal (M-PRK), and transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (T-PRK). SETTING: Tertiary care eye center. METHODS: This retrospective review comprised all cases of LASIK, LASEK, M-PRK, and T-PRK performed at King Khaled Eye Specialist Hospital between July 1, 2004, and June 30, 2005. Separate statistical analyses were performed for eyes with low to moderate myopia (spherical equivalent [SE] less than -6.00 diopters [D]) and high myopia (SE -6.00 to -11.25 D). RESULTS: Of 696 eyes that met the inclusion criteria, 464 had LASIK, 104 had LASEK, 69 had M-PRK, and 59 had T-PRK. Eyes with low to moderate myopia had a statistically significantly smaller mean difference between logMAR final postoperative uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) and preoperative best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) after T-PRK and M-PRK than after LASIK or LASEK. A higher percentage of eyes with high myopia had a final UCVA within +/-2 lines of the preoperative BSCVA with T-PRK than with LASIK, LASEK, or M-PRK. There were more major non-flap-related complications after LASEK than after LASIK, M-PRK, or T-PRK. CONCLUSIONS: In eyes with low to moderate myopia, T-PRK and M-PRK provided slightly better visual outcomes than LASIK or LASEK. In eyes with high myopia, T-PRK provided better visual outcomes than LASIK, LASEK, and M-PRK. Laser in situ keratomileusis was associated with the most major postoperative complications.     

Laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy for the correction of myopia

PURPOSE: To evaluate the results of laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy (LASEK) for spherical and spherocylindrical myopia. SETTING: Indiana Eye Institute, South Bend, Indiana, USA. METHODS: In a retrospective noncomparative single-surgeon interventional case series, outcomes in 222 consecutive eyes with myopia ranging from -1.25 to -11.25 diopters (D) and astigmatism up to +2.25 D treated with LASEK using a VISX Star S2 excimer laser were analyzed 4 days, 2 weeks, and 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery. RESULTS: The uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) was 20/40 or better in 84% of eyes at 4 days and in 98% at 2 weeks. At 12 months, in 84 eyes, the UCVA was 20/15 in 16 eyes (19.0%), 20/20 in 53 (63.1%), and 20/25 in 15 (17.9%). There was no loss of best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), and no eye required retreatment. CONCLUSION: Laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy for myopia provided excellent refractive and visual results with no loss of BSCVA and no serious complications. Subjective results and other measures of visual function need further evaluation.     

Laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy retreatment after laser in situ keratomileusis

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy (LASEK) retreatment after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). SETTING: Mater Private Hospital, Dublin, Ireland. METHODS: In this retrospective study, 22 eyes of 20 patients had LASEK retreatment for residual refractive errors after LASIK. All patients who had the procedure between January 2004 and May 2007 were included in the study. The main outcome measures at the final follow-up visit were efficacy, predictability, safety, and stability. RESULTS: The mean spherical equivalent (SE) was -4.50 diopters (D)+/-2.88 (SD) (range -10.00 to +3.87 D) before LASIK and -1.23+/-0.95 D (range -2.50 to +2.00 D) after LASIK. The mean time between the initial LASIK procedure and LASEK enhancement was 56.2+/-24.3 months (range 6 to 84 months). The mean follow-up after retreatment was 6.68+/-6.47 months (range 3 to 24 months). At the final follow-up visit, 19 eyes (86.4%) had an uncorrected visual acuity of 20/30 or better and 17 eyes (77.3%) were within +/-1.00 D of the target refraction. No patient lost more than 1 line of best corrected visual acuity or developed corneal haze greater than grade 1. CONCLUSION: Results indicate that LASEK retreatment after LASIK is a safe and effective alternative when LASIK retreatment is deemed unsafe because there is not sufficient residual corneal stromal bed or when retreatment is required many years after LASIK and relifting the original flap is expected to be problematic.     

Laser subepithelial keratomileusis for low to moderate myopia: 6-month follow-up

PURPOSE: To examine the effectiveness, safety, and stability of laser subepithelial keratomileusis (LASEK), a modified photorefractive keratectomy for low to moderate myopia. METHODS: This study evaluated the results of LASEK in 48 myopic patients (84 eyes) with a consecutive 6-month follow-up period. Preoperative myopia ranged from 3.25 to 7.00 diopters (D). Uncorrected and corrected visual acuity, manifest refraction, epithelial healing time, postoperative pain, subepithelial corneal haze, and complications were examined. RESULTS: Uncorrected visual acuity of 20/30 or better was achieved in 78.6% of eyes at 1 week and in 96.4% at 6 months after surgery. A mean refraction of within +/-0.50 D was measured in 42 eyes (50.0%) and +/-1.0 D in 79 eyes (94.0%) at 6 months. The epithelial healing time was 3.68 +/- 0.69 days (range, 3-6 days) and postoperative pain scores were 1.49 +/- 0.65. The subepithelial corneal haze scores were 0.56 +/- 0.34 and 0.16 +/- 0.25 at 1 and 6 months, respectively. As for complications, alcohol leakage during surgery occurred in 3 eyes, incomplete epithelial detachment in 3 eyes, contact lens intolerance in 5 eyes and steroid-induced elevated intraocular pressure (>21 mm Hg) in 1 eye. CONCLUSIONS: LASEK is an effective and safe procedure for low to moderate myopia. It can be considered an alternate type of refractive surgery for correction of low to moderate myopia.     

Effectiveness of laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy without mitomycin-C for the treatment of high myopia

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effectiveness and therapeutic range of laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy (LASEK) without mitomycin-C (MMC) to treat high myopia. SETTING: Isik Eye Clinic, Ankara, Turkey. METHODS: This study comprised 31 highly myopic eyes (19 patients) that had LASEK. Before primary LASEK treatment and 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after, all patients had a complete ophthalmic examination including visual acuity, refractive outcomes, and biomicroscopy. RESULTS: The mean spherical equivalent (SE) was -9.01 diopters (D) +/- 2.66 (SD) preoperatively and -1.00 +/- 1.15 D at the end of follow-up. At 24 months, the mean SE was within +/-1.00 D of the intended correction in 23 eyes (74.19%). The median uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) increased from 20/606 preoperatively to 20/28.6 at 24 months and the median best corrected visual acuity, from 20/25 to 20/22, respectively. Total higher-order and spherical aberrations increased significantly at the end of follow-up. All 14 eyes that had ablations greater than -8.62 D developed varying degrees of haze. Significant myopic regression (>1.00 D) leading to UCVA loss occurred in all eyes with a preoperative SE of -12.00 D or greater. CONCLUSIONS: The results of LASEK without MMC were excellent in eyes with up to -8.6 D of SE. All eyes with a preoperative SE between -8.6 and -12.0 D developed haze but had acceptable refractive and visual outcomes. Haze and myopic regression limited the success of LASEK in eyes with a preoperative SE of -12.0 D and greater.     

Laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy for myopia: two-year follow-up

PURPOSE: To assess and compare the clinical results (efficacy, safety, stability, and postoperative pain or discomfort) of laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy (LASEK) and conventional photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) for the correction of low to moderate myopia. SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, Masaryk University Hospital, Brno, Czech Republic. METHODS: A prospective comparative study was performed in 184 eyes of 92 patients who had surface excimer ablation for the correction of myopia. The preoperative mean spherical equivalent (MSE) was -4.65 diopters (D) +/- 3.14 (SD) (range -1.75 to -7.50 D). In each patient, LASEK was performed in 1 eye and PRK in the fellow eye by the same surgeon. The first eye treated and the surgical method used in the first eye were randomized. Both procedures were performed with the Nidek EC-5000 excimer laser using the same parameters and nomogram. The postoperative pain level, visual recovery, complications (haze), uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), and refractive outcome were evaluated and compared. All eyes completed a 24-month follow-up. RESULTS: The postoperative MSE was -0.18 +/- 0.53 D in the PRK eyes and -0.33 +/- 0.46 D in the LASEK eyes. At 1 week, the mean UCVA was 0.64 +/- 0.21 and 0.87 +/- 0.23, respectively. No LASEK eye lost a line of BSCVA. There were no statistically significant differences between PRK and LASEK eyes in the safety and efficacy indices at 2 years. The mean pain level was significantly lower on days 1 to 3 in the LASEK eyes (P <.05). The mean corneal haze level was lower in the LASEK eyes (0.21) than in the PRK eyes (0.43) (P <.05). Seventy-nine patients preferred LASEK to PRK. CONCLUSIONS: Laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy provided significantly quicker visual recovery, eliminated post-PRK pain, and reduced the haze level in eyes with low to moderate myopia compared with conventional PRK. It provided good visual and refractive outcomes. There were no serious complications.     

Vitality of epithelial cells after alcohol exposure during laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy flap preparation

PURPOSE:To evaluate the vitality of epithelial cells after various exposure times to 20% ethanol and epithelial flap preparation in laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy (LASEK) using the trypan blue dye test. SETTING: University Eye Clinic Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany, and the Rayne Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, St. Thomas' Hospital, London, United Kingdom. METHODS: Five human cadaver eyes were exposed to 20% ethanol for 15, 30, 45, 60, and 120 seconds, respectively. After an epithelial flap (as in LASEK) was prepared, the flap was deliberately cut off. The flaps were soaked in a trypan blue 0.1% solution at 37 degrees C. After 3 washes with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), the specimens were reincubated for 30 minutes in culture medium containing 10% fetal calf serum at 37 degrees C. After an additional wash with PBS, the cells were observed with a standard inverted light microscope. RESULTS: After 15- and 30-second exposure to 20% ethanol, most epithelial cells were vital. This changed substantially after 45 seconds, when vital and dead cells were approximately equal. Longer exposure times (60 seconds and 120 seconds) showed predominantly dead epithelial cells. CONCLUSIONS: Exposure to 20% ethanol should be 20 to 30 seconds as the number of vital epithelial cells rapidly decreased after that. Vitality of the epithelial flap is probably a crucial factor in the dampened wound response in LASEK compared to that in photorefractive keratectomy.     

Analysis of the efficacy, predictability, and safety of LASEK for myopia and myopic astigmatism using the Technolas 217 excimer laser

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy, predictability, and safety of laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy (LASEK) for the treatment of myopia and myopic astigmatism. SETTING: Stanford University Eye Laser Center, Stanford, California, USA. METHODS: This retrospective analysis comprised 102 eyes that had LASEK for myopia using the Bausch & Lomb Technolas 217 excimer laser. Primary outcome variables including uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best spectacle- corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), manifest refraction, and complications were evaluated at 3, 6, and 12 months. Vector analysis was performed on eyes that received astigmatic correction. RESULTS: The mean spherical equivalent was -7.03 diopters (D) +/- 2.61 (SD) preoperatively, +0.19 +/- 0.64 D at 3 months, +0.23 +/- 0.82 D at 6 months, and +0.03 +/- 0.63 D at 12 months (P<.001). At 3, 6, and 12 months, the UCVA was 20/20 or better in 66%, 67%, and 83% of eyes, respectively, and 20/40 or better in 98%, 99%, and 100%; 74%, 70%, and 83%, respectively, were within +/-0.5 D of emmetropia, and 89%, 86%, and 97%, respectively, were within +/-1.0 D. No eye lost more than 2 lines of BSCVA. At 3, 6, and 12 months, 10.0%, 8.7%, and 0% of eyes, respectively, had trace corneal haze. Vector analysis found a success rate of approximately 78% to 80% in achieving the astigmatic surgical correction at the 3 postoperative visits. CONCLUSIONS: Laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy was an effective, predictable, and safe procedure for the treatment of myopia and myopic astigmatism. Further studies are needed to determine the role of LASEK in the refractive surgery spectrum.     

Laser epithelial keratomileusis for myopia

PURPOSE: To describe a new technique for excimer laser corneal surgery: laser epithelial keratomileusis (LASEK). METHODS: We report 76 eyes with spherical equivalent refractive myopia ranging from -8.00 to -22.00 D (mean -11.00 +/- 3.00 D). Using ethanol applied over an 8.5-mm-diameter area for 20 seconds, the epithelium was detached and photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) was performed. The epithelium was reapplied to the ocular surface and covered with a therapeutic soft contact lens. Treatments were carried out with the Nidek EC-5000 excimer laser. RESULTS: At a mean of 803 days after LASEK, mean spherical equivalent refraction was -1.80 +/- 2.40 D (range -9.27 to +2.00 D). Stability was reached in approximately 60 days. Fifty-nine percent of the epithelial flaps were easy to detach intact during surgery and 62.7% of patients reported no postoperative pain. Eighty-four percent of eyes had the therapeutic bandage lens removed by the fourth postoperative day. Twelve percent of eyes had incomplete epithelial flap removal. Epithelium can fall off the cornea during the healing phase. No significant subepithelial haze was seen in 95% of eyes. CONCLUSION: With LASEK, it may be possible to treat a larger diameter ablation zone in thinner corneas without the problems of a LASIK stromal flap and with less postoperative pain than PRK, with minimal subepithelial haze.     

Surface ablation after laser in situ keratomileusis: retreatment on the flap

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of superficial laser ablation on the flap as a treatment for residual ametropia after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). SETTING: Private practice refractive surgery center, Utrecht, The Netherlands. METHODS: This retrospective study comprised 18 eyes of 15 patients who had alcohol-assisted photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) or laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy (LASEK) retreatment for residual ametropia after LASIK. All patients who had retreatment on the flap between June 2004 and June 2005 were included in the study. Retreatments were performed by wavefront-guided excimer laser surface ablation using the Visx Star S4 laser. Outcome measures included uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), subjective refraction, and biomicroscopy at the 3-, 6-, and 12-month postoperative visits. RESULTS: The preoperative spherical equivalent (SE) refraction was -0.63 diopter (D) +/- 0.87 (SD) (range -2.00 to +1.38 D). The mean amount of ablated cornea was 21.3 +/- 7.4 microm. At 3 months, the mean UCVA was 0.83 +/- 1.5 lines (range 0.40 to 1.25), yielding an efficacy index of 0.87. At 6 months, the mean UCVA increased to 0.98 +/- 0.8 line (range 0.63 to 1.25) and the efficacy index, to 1.03. At 12 months, 6 eyes were lost to follow-up. The mean UCVA was 0.83 +/- 2.2 lines (range 0.20 to 1.25), with an efficacy index of 0.87. The mean BSCVA was 0.98 +/- 0.9 line (range 0.80 to 1.25) at 3 months and 1.05 +/- 0.6 line (range 0.80 to 1.25) at 6 months, yielding a safety index of 1.03 and 1.11, respectively. At 12 months, the mean BSCVA was 0.95 +/- 1.0 line (range 0.63 to 1.25), with a safety index of 1.0. At 6 months, no eye had lost lines of BSCVA, 11 eyes had no change, and 7 eyes gained 1 line. At 12 months, 2 eyes lost 1 line of BSCVA, 8 eyes had no change, and 2 eyes gained 1 line. The mean SE refraction was +0.10 +/- 0.27 D (range -0.25 to +0.63 D) at 3 months, +0.06 +/- 0.37 D (range -0.50 to +1.13 D) at 6 months, and +0.15 +/- 0.39 D (range -0.50 to +0.88 D) at 12 months. On biomicroscopic examination, 1 eye had prolonged grade 1 haze that disappeared before 6 months. Two eyes of 1 patient who had hyperopic retreatment developed late-onset haze 8 months postoperatively. Eyes with microstriae in the flap before retreatment showed significant improvement after retreatment. There were no sight-threatening complications. CONCLUSION: Wavefront-guided LASEK or alcohol-assisted PRK retreatment on the surface of a LASIK flap was safe and effective in correcting small amounts of residual myopia.     

MEL-80治疗近视的准分子激光上皮下角膜磨镶术效果评价

目的评价使用蔡司MEL-80准分子激光治疗仪施行准分子激光上皮下角膜磨镶术（1aser-assisted subepithe-lial keratomileusis，LASEK）治疗近视和近视散光的预测性、有效性、安全性和稳定性。方法回顾性分析使用MEL-80准分子激光治疗系统行LASEK治疗近视和近视散光的连续性病例76例（150眼），于术后第1天、第1、第3、第6和第12个月定期随访，检查裸眼视力，以显然主觉验光检查术后屈光状态及最佳矫正视力。结果术后第10天、第1、第3、第6和第12个月时，裸眼视力平均值分别为4．91±0．15、4．97±0．26、5．05±0．37、5．12±0、20、4．96±0．24。预测性：术前屈光度等效球镜值为（-6．25±1．25）D，术后第3、第6和第12个月分别降到（＋0．12±0．42）D、（-0．03±0．23）D、（-0．15±0．36）D，术后第3、第6和第12个月屈光度变化量在＋0．50D以内的比例分别为94．6％、96．0％、97．3％。术后第3、第6和第12个月离焦等效球镜值在±0．50D内的眼数分别为88．0％、96．0％、96．6％。有效性：术后第3个月，24．0％的眼裸眼视力（uncor-rected visual acuity,UCVA）≥5．1，94．6％的眼UCVA≥5．0，97.3％的眼UCVA≥4．9。术后第6个月，36．0％的眼UCVA≥5．1．96．0％的眼UCVA≥5．0，98．6％的眼UCVA≥4．9。术后第12个月，38．0％的眼UCVA≥5．1，98．0％的眼UCVA≥5．0，98．6％的眼UCVA≥4．9。安全性：术后第3、第6、第12个月，均无任何一眼最佳矫正视力（best spectacle corrected vision acuity，BSCVA）下降2行以上；分别有34．6％、34．6％和30．0％的眼BSCVA提高1行；16．0％、17．3％和14．6％的眼BSCVA提高2行。稳定性：术后第3、第6、第12个月显然验光值等效球镜平均值变化小于1．00D。结论使用MEL-80的LASEK治疗近视和近视散光有良好的预测性、有效性、安全性和稳定性。     

Laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy and photorefractive keratectomy for the correction of hyperopia. Results of a 2-year follow-up

PURPOSE: To evaluate and compare the efficacy, safety, predictability, and stability of laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy (LASEK) and photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) for low to moderate hyperopia with a 2-year follow-up. SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, Masaryk University Hospital, Brno, Czech Republic. METHODS: This prospective comparative single-surgeon study included 216 eyes of 108 patients with hyperopia who received PRK in 1 eye and LASEK in the contralateral eye. The mean patient age was 38.3 years (range 25 to 58 years). The mean preoperative spherical equivalent (SE) cycloplegic refraction was +3.67 diopters (D) +/- 1.15 (SD) (range +2.00 to +5.00 D), and astigmatism was less than 1.00 D. In each patient, PRK was performed in 1 eye (Group A) and LASEK was performed in the other eye (Group B) using the Nidek EC-5000 excimer laser. Postoperative uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best corrected visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, manifest and cycloplegic refractions, refractive stability and predictability, postoperative pain, and corneal haze were examined and statistically analyzed. A P value less than 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: At 1 week, the UCVA was 20/40 or better in 58% of PRK eyes and 85% of LASEK eyes (P =.037); at 2 years, it was 20/40 or better in 81% and 91%, respectively (P =.076). At 2 years, the UCVA for near was N8 or better in 73% of PRK eyes and 89% of LASEK eyes (P =.064). No patient lost 2 or more lines of Snellen visual acuity. The safety index was 1.03 in PRK eyes and 1.08 in LASEK eyes. Refractive stability was achieved at 6 months in LASEK eyes and at 12 months in PRK eyes. The mean SE cycloplegic refraction decreased from +3.58 D (PRK eyes) and +3.76 D (LASEK eyes) at baseline to +0.74 D and +0.32 D, respectively, at 2 years; in 57% and 78% of eyes, respectively, the refraction was within +/-0.50 D of the targeted refraction. Peripheral corneal haze scores at 3 to 9 months and pain scores at 1 to 3 days were significantly lower in the LASEK group than in the PRK group. CONCLUSIONS: Laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy for hyperopia up to +5.00 D provided good visual and refractive results. It significantly reduced postoperative pain, grade of peripheral ring-shaped corneal haze, and regression of hyperopia. Hyperopic LASEK provided quicker visual recovery and achieved better efficacy, predictability, and refractive stability than hyperopic PRK.     

Laser in situ keratomileusis versus laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy for the correction of high myopia

PURPOSE: To compare the visual and refractive outcomes of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy (LASEK) in the treatment of high myopia. SETTING: Institute of Vision Research, Department of Ophthalmology, College of Medicine, Yonsei University, and Balgeunsesang Ophthalmology Clinic, Seoul, South Korea. METHODS: Four hundred seventy eyes of 240 patients with manifest refraction spherical components greater than -6.00 diopters (D) were assigned to 2 groups: 324 eyes (167 patients) were treated with LASIK and 146 eyes (73 patients), with LASEK. Uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), remaining refractive error, corneal haze, and complications were followed in both groups for 12 months. RESULTS: At 12 months, the mean spherical equivalent (SE) was within +/-0.50 D of emmetropia in 205 eyes (63.3%) in the LASIK group and 81 eyes (55.5%) in the LASEK group and within +/-1.00 D in 261 eyes (80.6%) and 104 eyes (71.2%), respectively. The UCVA was 20/25 or better in 269 LASIK eyes (83.0%) and 111 LASEK eyes (76.0%). There was more than a 1-line loss of BSCVA in 4 LASIK eyes (1.2%) and 21 LASEK eyes (14.3%). The between-group differences in SE, magnitude of cylinder, UCVA, and haze were statistically significant (P<.05). CONCLUSIONS: Both LASIK and LASEK were safe and effectively treated eyes with high myopia. Laser in situ keratomileusis provided superior results in visual predictability and corneal opacity.     

Comparison of visual results between laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy and epipolis laser in situ keratomileusis to correct myopia and myopic astigmatism

PURPOSE: To compare the visual results after laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy (LASEK) and epipolis laser in situ keratomileusis (epi-LASIK) to correct myopia. DESIGN: Retrospective, interventional, nonrandomized comparative study. METHODS: Patients treated with LASEK to correct myopia < or = -9.00 diopters (D) were compared to age- and refraction-matched patients treated with epi-LASIK using the same excimer laser (Esiris; Schwind Eye Tech Solutions, Kleinostheim, Germany). The epithelial flap was replaced after the ablation in every case. The visual results after both procedures were compared at each postoperative visit (one day, one week, one and three months). RESULTS: Ninety-four consecutive eyes were included in the study (47 in each group), matched for age and refraction. The preoperative spherical manifest refraction was -3.98 +/- 2.40 D in the LASEK group and -3.95 +/- 2.40 D in the epi-LASIK group (P = .9) (range -0.50 to -9.00 D). The uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) one day postoperatively was 0.7 +/- 0.2 and 0.5 +/- 0.2 (P < .001), and one week after surgery it was 0.8 +/- 0.2 and 0.7 +/- 0.2, respectively (P = .1). The difference was again statistically significant one month after surgery (0.94 +/- 0.1 after LASEK, 0.82 +/- 0.1 after epi-LASIK, P < .001), but not three months postoperatively (1.06 +/- 0.21 and 1.03 +/- 0.18, respectively, P = .1). UCVA was > or =1.0 in 78.7% of LASEK eyes and 65.9% of epi-LASIK eyes three months after surgery. At that moment, the safety indices were 0.99 +/- 0.1 after LASEK and 0.93 +/- 0.1 after epi-LASIK (P = .04). The efficacy indices were 0.97 +/- 0.1 and 0.89 +/- 0.1, respectively (P = .01). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest a faster visual rehabilitation and better safety and efficacy outcomes after LASEK compared to epi-LASIK with repositioning of the epithelial flap when correcting low to moderate myopia.     

Laser epithelial keratomileusis for the treatment of low to moderate myopia: preliminary results

PURPOSE: To analyze the refractive outcome and the postoperative pain and corneal haze following laser epithelial keratomileusis (LASEK) for the treatment of low to moderate myopia. METHODS: A monocentric prospective noncomparative study was started in June 2000, after informed consent was obtained from patients with a spherical equivalent of less than -5 diopters (D). This study actually was part of another prospective comparative study where the contralateral eye underwent photorefractive keratectomy. An epithelial debridement was performed using diluted ethanol, the epithelial flap was lifted, photoablation was performed, the flap was put back in place, and secured by a bandage contact lens. The refractive outcome was assessed, and postoperative pain and haze were graded using an analogical visual scale from 0 to 10 and a scale of 0 to 4, respectively. RESULTS: We included 17 eyes of 16 patients. LASEK was performed successfully in 15 eyes (88.2%). One of these eyes could not be assessed for the refractive outcome and postoperative haze because the epithelial flap was torn during contact lens removal. The mean postoperative pain level during the night following the procedure was 5.7+/-2.0. The mean preoperative spherical equivalent (SE) was -2.5+/-1.0 D, and after a 2-month follow-up, the mean postoperative SE was +0.26+/-0.6 D. Twelve eyes (85.7%) and 10 eyes (71.4%) were within +/-1.0 D and +/-0.5 D from the attempted correction, respectively. The corneal haze grade was less than 1 in 12 eyes (85.7%) and equal to 1 in two eyes (14.3%). No complications and no loss of postoperative best-corrected visual acuity were noted. CONCLUSIONS: LASEK appears to be a reliable and reproducible technique for the treatment of myopia-associated SE of less than -5 D. Postoperative pain is moderate and flap-related complications of LASIK are avoided.     

Laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy (LASEK) without alcohol versus photorefractive keratectomy (PRK)

PURPOSE: To evaluate epithelial healing and visual outcome after laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy (LASEK) without alcohol de-epithelialization and to compare this technique to photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) in myopia. METHODS: In a series of 1953 patients undergoing bilateral myopic PRK, an epithelial flap could be obtained by manual de-epithelialization in the left eye of 56 patients without alcohol exposure. The right eye was treated by PRK and the left by LASEK (i.e., repositioning the viable flap after surface ablation). The two eyes were compared in terms of pain, uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) in decimals, correction achieved, and haze. The epithelial healing pattern was assessed in the LASEK eyes. RESULTS: The flap remained viable, showing a peripheral junction, in 25 eyes (45%). Pain was higher in the PRK eye in 11/56 patients (20%), higher in the LASEK eye in 23/56 patients (41%), and the same in both eyes in 22/56 patients (39%). UCVA at one week was slightly better in the LASEK eyes (median 0.7 versus 0.6, p = 0.002 with Wilcoxon test), but was the same in PRK and LASEK eyes after 1 month (median 0.9 in both). Median haze at 6 months was 0.5 in the PRK eyes and 0 in the LASEK eyes (Wilcoxon p = 0.007). Median postoperative defocus equivalent at 9 months was 0.5 diopters in both the PRK and the LASEK eyes. CONCLUSIONS: Although our study might have selected patients with loose epithelium, LASEK performed by manual de-epithelialization in the absence of alcohol exposure is not less painful than PRK, even in case of flap survival. Visual recovery speed, as well as haze, is slightly better than in PRK, although the difference is clinically negligible.     

Effect of amniotic membrane after laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy on epithelial healing: clinical and refractive outcomes

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of an amniotic membrane (AM) on reepithelialization time, corneal haze, and postoperative visual and refractive outcomes after laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy (LASEK) for myopia and myopic astigmatism. SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, and Balgeunsesang Ophthalmology Clinic, Seoul, Korea. METHODS: One hundred fifty-two eyes of 84 patients with myopia or myopic astigmatism were prospectively evaluated for 6 months after LASEK. An AM was placed as a strip on the inferior limbus in 94 eyes of 54 patients after LASEK; 58 eyes of 30 patients served as the control group. Postoperative epithelial healing time, uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best corrected visual acuity, remaining refractive error, and corneal haze were examined. RESULTS: The reepithelialization time was shorter in the AM group (2.40 days +/- 0.94 [SD]) than in the control group (3.90 +/- 0.97 days) (P<.001). At 6 months, 86 eyes (91.5%) in the AM group had a UCVA of 20/25 or better and 90 eyes (95.7%) had a UCVA of 20/40 or better; 48 eyes (82.8%) and 53 eyes (91.4%) in the control group had a UCVA of 20/25 or better and 20/40 or better, respectively. The mean spherical equivalent in the AM group was -0.48 +/- 0.54 diopter (D) and in the control group, -0.94 +/- 0.60 D (P<.001). The corneal haze was significantly less in the AM group than in the control group (P<.001). CONCLUSION: Amniotic membrane use after LASEK induced rapid epithelial healing with more favorable visual and refractive outcomes and lower corneal haze scores than conventional LASEK.