Transvaginal cystocele repair using tension-free polypropylene mesh at the time of sacrospinous colpopexy for advanced uterovaginal prolapse: a prospective randomised study

The management of an advanced multi-compartment prolapse requires a combination of techniques. The objective of this study was to report the anatomical outcomes of a prospective randomised trial comparing tension-free polypropylene mesh-reinforced anterior vaginal prolapse with anterior colporrhaphy at the time sacrospinous colpopexy and posterior fascial plication for the management of massive uterovaginal prolapse. A total of 116 patients with a stage III or IV (Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification System/International Continence Society) uterovaginal prolapse were randomised into two groups. The mesh group includes transvaginal cystocele repair using a tension-free polypropylene mesh, while the non-mesh group includes anterior colporrhaphy. All patients in the two groups underwent a sacrospinous colpopexy and posterior fascial plication. The primary outcome was objective success < stage 2 prolapse. The secondary outcomes were reoperation for recurrent prolapse, subjective success rates, patient satisfaction with the surgery and complications. The overall objective success rates (in all compartments) were 79 % (42/53) in the mesh group and 62 % (39/63) in the non-mesh group (p?=?0.043). The objective success rates in the anterior compartment were 85 % (45/53) in the mesh group and 62 % (39/63) in the non-mesh group (p?=?0.006). Three (6 %) patients in the mesh group and 12 (19 %) in the non-mesh group underwent repeat surgery for recurrent pelvic organ prolapse (p?=?0.03). The subjective success rates were 89 % (47/53) in the mesh group and 76 % (48/63) in the non-mesh group (p value?=?0.08). The mean patient satisfaction rates with the surgery were 84 % in the mesh group and 76 % in the non-mesh group (p?=?0.08). The development of a urinary tract infection, right-sided buttock pain (temporary sciatic neuralgia) and new-onset stress urinary incontinence were not significantly different between the two groups. The mesh exposure rate was 8 %. Transvaginal cystocele repair using tension-free polypropylene mesh at the time of sacrospinous colpopexy and posterior fascial plication offers lower anatomic recurrence and less need for further prolapse surgery to correct recurrent pelvic floor defects than anterior colporrhaphy, sacrospinous colpopexy and posterior fascial plication.     

Vaginal repair with mesh versus colporrhaphy for prolapse: a randomised controlled trial

Objective  To compare vaginal repair augmented by mesh with traditional colporrhaphy for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse.
Design  Prospective randomised controlled trial.
Setting  Tertiary teaching hospital.
Population  One hundred and thirty-nine women with stage ≥2 prolapse according to the pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POP-Q) system requiring both anterior and posterior compartment repair.
Methods  Subjects were randomised to anterior and posterior vaginal repair with mesh augmentation (mesh group, n  = 69) or traditional anterior and posterior colporrhaphy (no mesh group, n  = 70).
Main outcome measures  The primary outcome was the absence of POP-Q stage ≥2 prolapse at 12 months. Secondary outcomes were symptoms, quality-of-life outcomes and satisfaction with surgery. Complications were also reported.
Results  For subjects attending the 12-month review, success in the mesh group was 81.0% (51 of 63 subjects) compared with 65.6% (40/61) in the no mesh group and was not significantly different ( P -value = 0.07). A high level of satisfaction with surgery and improvements in symptoms and quality-of-life data were observed at 12 months compared to baseline in both groups, but there was no significant difference in these outcomes between the two groups. Vaginal mesh exposure occurred in four women in the mesh group (5.6%). De novo dyspareunia was reported by five of 30 (16.7%) sexually active women in the mesh group and five of 33 (15.2%) in the no mesh group at 12 months.
Conclusion  In this study, vaginal surgery augmented by mesh did not result in significantly less recurrent prolapse than traditional colporrhaphy 12 months following surgery.     

Anterior colporrhaphy: A randomized trial of three surgical techniques

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes after anterior colporrhaphy with the use of 3 different surgical techniques. STUDY DESIGN: One hundred fourteen women with anterior vaginal prolapse were randomly assigned to undergo anterior repair by one of 3 techniques: standard, standard plus polyglactin 910 mesh, or ultralateral anterior colporrhaphy. Before and after operation, patients underwent physical examination staging of prolapse; the International Continence Society system was used. Symptoms were assessed by questionnaire and visual analog scales. We defined "cure" as satisfactory (stage I) or optimal (stage 0) outcome at points Aa and Ba. RESULTS: Of 114 patients who were originally enrolled, 109 patients underwent operation, and 83 patients (76%) returned for follow-up. Mean age (+/- SD) was 64.7 +/- 11.1 years. At entry, 7 patients (7%) had stage I anterior vaginal prolapse; 35 patients (37%) had stage II anterior vaginal prolapse; 51 patients (54%) had stage III anterior vaginal prolapse; and 2 patients (2%) had stage IV anterior vaginal prolapse. At a median length of follow-up of 23.3 months, 10 of 33 patients (30%) who were randomly assigned to the standard anterior colporrhaphy group experienced satisfactory or optimal anatomic results, compared with 11 of 26 patients (42%) with standard plus mesh and with 11 of 24 patients (46%) with ultralateral anterior colporrhaphy. The severity of symptoms that were related to prolapse improved markedly (preoperative score, 6.9 +/- 2.7; postoperative score, 1.1 +/- 0.8). Twenty-three of 24 patients (96%) no longer required manual pressure to void after operation. CONCLUSION: These 3 techniques of anterior colporrhaphy provided similar anatomic cure rates and symptom resolution for anterior vaginal prolapse repair. The addition of polyglactin 910 mesh did not improve the cure rate compared with standard anterior colporrhaphy.     

Efficacy and outcome of anterior vaginal wall repair using polypropylene mesh (Gynemesh)

AIM: The aim of the present study was to assess the safety and efficacy of anterior vaginal wall repair using polypropylene mesh for the correction of anterior vaginal wall prolapse. METHODS: From May 2001 to March 2005, 38 patients with cystoceles or uterine prolapse underwent transvaginal repair with implantation of polypropylene mesh. In all 38 patients anterior vaginal wall repair was done concurrently with other procedures: vaginal hysterectomy, n = 18 (47.4%) and tension-free vaginal tapes n = 22 (57.9%). RESULTS: Preoperatively 26 patients (68.4%) had stage III/IV prolapse on pelvic organ prolapse quantification examination. After mean follow up of 23.4 months, the objective cure rate at 12 and 18 months was 94.5% and 94.3%, respectively. As for complications associated with placement of the polypropylene mesh, no tissue erosion or infection was found. CONCLUSIONS: Transvaginal implantation of polypropylene mesh is an effective and safe technique for the correction of anterior vaginal wall prolapse.     

Anterior colporrhaphy versus repair with mesh for anterior vaginal wall prolapse: a comparative clinical study

Purpose

To compare the clinical effectiveness of anterior colporrhaphy versus mesh repair as surgical management of anterior vaginal prolapse.

Methods

Of 50 patients with ≥stage II anterior vaginal prolapse on Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POPQ) system who were initially approached, 44 consented and underwent surgery. They were randomly recruited into two groups. Group I (23 patients) received anterior colporrhaphy, while group II (21 patients) received soft polypropylene mesh (GYNEMESH*PS, Gynecare, Ethicon, France). Clinical assessment took place preoperatively and postoperatively at definite intervals. Functional and anatomical comparisons were based on comparison between preoperative and 24?months postoperative assessments of symptoms and POPQ stages, respectively. Four patients in total did not complete the follow-up assessments and were excluded.

Results

Both groups showed clinical improvement in their symptoms and POPQ staging at the end of the postoperative follow-up period. Improvement, however, was more significant in the repair with mesh group, as patients in this group reported better improvement of their prolapse symptoms, mainly vaginal bulge/pressure sensation (P?P?P?Conclusion Our data shows that repair with mesh is superior to anterior colporrhaphy with more satisfactory outcome to the patients. Due to the small size of our study and uncertainty of the long-term safety and resilience of the mesh, we recommend larger studies to confirm our preliminary results.     

采用聚丙烯网片的阴道前壁修补术治疗阴道前壁脱垂临床效果的荟萃分析

目的:比较聚丙烯网片和传统的前壁修补术对阴道前壁脱垂患者的临床效果及并发症。方法:通过Pubmed数据库、Cochrane图书馆数据库、荷兰医学文摘(EMBASE)、OVID数据库,收集国外已发表的1990年至2013年符合要求的英文随机对照实验,按纳入和排除标准进行筛选和质量评估,采用RevMan 5.2对手术失败率、术后新增压力性尿失禁、新增的性交困难、术后尿储留进行meta分析。结果:经筛选,共纳入10篇符合要求的随机对照文献,共1288例受试者。与传统的前壁修补术比较,使用聚丙烯网片能明显降低手术的失败率(P0.01,RR=0.37,95%CI为0.31~0.45),术后新增的压力性尿失禁和性交困难则无显著差异(P=0.10,RR=1.52,95%CI为0.93~2.48;P=0.16,RR=1.99,95%CI为0.97~4.08),术后尿储留网片发生率较高(P0.05,RR=2.31,95%CI为1.10~4.83)。结论:使用聚丙烯网片能显著降低手术的失败率和术后复发率,但在术后并发症上无特殊优势,并且术后尿储留的发生率略高。     

Effects of Vaginal Prolapse Surgery on Sexuality in Women and Men; Results from a RCT on Repair With and Without Mesh

IntroductionIn pelvic organ prolapse (POP) repair, the use of synthetic mesh is not only increasing but also a subject of discussion. The focus shifts from anatomical toward functional outcome, with sexual function being an important parameter. One of the concerns with mesh usage in POP surgery is the possible negative effect on sexual function.AimTo compare and assess sexual function in women and men after primary cystocele repair with or without trocar‐guided transobturator mesh.MethodsOne hundred twenty‐five women with a symptomatic cystocele stage ≥ II were included in this multicenter randomized controlled trial and assessed at baseline and 6‐month follow‐up.Main Outcome MeasuresFemale sexual function was measured by the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) and male sexual function by the Male Sexual Health Questionnaire. A subgroup analysis of women with a participating partner was performed.ResultsIn the mesh group, 54/59 women vs. 53/62 in the anterior colporrhaphy group participated. In men, 29 vs. 30 participated. After surgery, FSFI scores were comparable for both treatment groups. However, within group analysis showed significant improvement on the domains pain (effect size = 0.5), lubrication (effect size = 0.4), and overall satisfaction (effect size = 0.5) in the colporrhaphy group. This improvement was not observed in the mesh group. A subgroup of women with a participating partner reported significantly higher baseline domain scores as compared with other women and did not report a significant improvement of sexual functioning irrespective of treatment allocation. Worsening of baseline sexual function was reported by 43% of women in the mesh group compared with 18% in anterior colporrhaphy group (P = 0.05). Male sexual functioning did not change in either group.ConclusionsWomen after an anterior colporrhaphy report a significant and clinically relevant improvement of their sexual functioning, whereas women after a mesh procedure did not. Vollebregt A, Fischer K, Gietelink D, and van der Vaart CH. Effects of vaginal prolapse surgery on sexuality in women and men; results from a RCT on repair with and without mesh. J Sex Med 12;9:1200–1211.     

A prospective randomized trial using solvent dehydrated fascia lata for the prevention of recurrent anterior vaginal wall prolapse

OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to compare outcomes after anterior colporrhaphy with and without a solvent dehydrated cadaveric fascia lata graft. STUDY DESIGN: A total of 162 women were enrolled in a prospective, randomized trial that evaluated the impact of a solvent dehydrated cadaveric fascia lata patch on recurrent anterior vaginal prolapse. Subjects were randomly assigned to standard colporrhaphy with or without a patch. Before and after surgery, subjects were evaluated by both the Baden-Walker and pelvic organ prolapse quantification systems. "Failure" was defined as stage II anterior wall prolapse or worse. RESULTS: Of 154 women randomly assigned (76 patch: 78 no patch), all underwent surgery and 153 (99%) returned for follow-up. Sixteen women (21%) in the patch group and 23 (29%) in the control group experienced recurrent anterior vaginal wall prolapse (P = .229). Only 26% of all recurrences were symptomatic. Concomitant transvaginal Cooper's ligament sling procedures were associated with a dramatic decrease in recurrent prolapse (odds ratio [OR] 0.105 , P < .0001). CONCLUSION: Solvent dehydrated fascia lata as a barrier does not decrease recurrent prolapse after anterior colporrhaphy. Transvaginal bladder neck slings were associated with a significant reduction in the risk of recurrent anterior wall prolapse.     

Functional and anatomical outcome of anterior and posterior vaginal prolapse repair with prolene mesh

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of prolene mesh on urinary, bowel and sexual function in prolapse surgery. DESIGN: Prospective observational study on consecutive women. SETTING: Two referral uorgynaecological units in Italy. POPULATION: Women requiring prolapse repair for anterior or posterior vaginal prolapse. METHODS: All women were assessed for urinary, bowel, prolapse symptoms and dyspareunia pre- and post-operatively. Urodynamics was performed in selected cases. Surgery consisted of an anterior or posterior repair plus a prolene mesh. Follow up was after 1, 6 and 12 months. The ANOVA test was used for statistical analysis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Vaginal anatomical restoration, urinary, bowel and sexual function. RESULTS: We recruited 63 women (mean age 63 years) with a mean follow up of 17 months. Anatomically, the success rate was 94%. Thirty-two women had an anterior repair. Among this group, the sexual activity rate did not alter but dyspareunia increased by 20%. Urge and stress incontinence did not change post-operatively but urgency improved in 10% and 13% had vaginal erosion of the mesh. Thirty-one women had a posterior repair. Among this group, sexual activity decreased by 12% and dyspareunia increased in 63%. Constipation improved in 15% and anal incontinence in 4%, and 6.5% of women had vaginal erosion of the mesh and one required mesh removal for pelvic abscess. CONCLUSIONS: Although this study shows good anatomical results with the use of prolene mesh for prolapse repair, there was a high rate of morbidity. We believe that the use of prolene mesh should be abandoned.     

Tension-free polypropylene mesh for vaginal repair of anterior vaginal wall prolapse

OBJECTIVE: To study the ongoing results of the repair of anterior vaginal wall prolapse reinforced with tension-free polypropylene mesh (GyneMesh, Gynecare, Ethicon, Issy-Les-Moulineaux, France). STUDY DESIGN: A case series of 87 consecutive women with anterior vaginal wall prolapse who underwent a transvaginal procedure using polypropylene mesh between October 1999 and August 2002. The mean age (+/-SD) was 62.4+/-13.4 years. Before the operation, patients underwent physical examination staging of the prolapse with the International Pelvic Organ Prolapse staging system. Thirteen women had stage 2 anterior vaginal wall prolapse (14.9%), 59 had stage 3 (67.9%), and 15 had stage 4 (17.3%). The polypropylene mesh was placed from the retropubic space to the inferior part of the bladder in a tension-freefashion. Patients were followed for 9-43 months, with a median follow-up (+/-SD) of 24+/-9.6 months. We defined "cure" as satisfactory (stage 1) or optimal (stage 0) outcome for point Ba in the staging system. RESULTS: Eighty-four patients returned for follow-up (96.6%). At follow-up, 77 women were cured (91.6%), 5 women had asymptomatic stage 2 anterior vaginal wall prolapse, and 2 had a recurrent stage 3 (2.4%). There were no postoperative infections. There were a total of 7 vaginal erosions of the mesh (8.3%); 4 necessitated a second procedure for partial excision of the mesh. CONCLUSION: Vaginal repair of anterior vaginal wall prolapse reinforced with tension-free polypropylene mesh is effective and relatively safe. Vaginal erosion occurred in 8.3% of the study population but was easily manageable, with no sequelae.     

Transvaginal repair of anterior and posterior compartment prolapse with Atrium polypropylene mesh

OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy and safety of a new technique using Atrium polypropylene mesh (Atrium, Hudson, New Hampshire, USA) as an overlay graft for repair of large or recurrent anterior and posterior compartment prolapse. DESIGN: A retrospective review of women who had vaginal prolapse surgery with Atrium mesh reinforcement. SETTING: Tertiary referral urogynaecology unit in Australia. POPULATION: Forty-seven women where mesh was placed under the bladder base with lateral extensions onto the pelvic sidewall, 33 women where a Y-shaped mesh was placed from the sacrospinous ligaments to the perineal body and 17 women who had mesh placement in both compartments. METHODS: Women were assessed by site-specific vaginal examination pre-operatively and post-operatively at six weeks, six months and two years. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: All complications. Rate of recurrent prolapse assessed by the Baden-Walker halfway classification system. RESULTS: Mean follow up was 29 months (range 6 to 52). Four of 64 women with anterior mesh placement (6%) developed a grade 2 asymptomatic cystocele. Five women (5%) required further surgery for recurrent prolapse at a non-mesh site. Erosion occurred in nine women (9%). Three healed after intravaginal oestrogen cream, five after excision of exposed mesh and vaginal closure and one woman also had surgical closure of a rectovaginal fistula. The risk of mesh erosion decreased over the study period. Urinary, coital and bowel symptoms were significantly improved following surgery. CONCLUSIONS: This technique shows promise in correcting pelvic organ prolapse. Vaginal mesh erosion is the most common complication and is related to surgical experience.     

The use of grafts for anterior vaginal prolapse repair: pros and cons

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To review the advantages and disadvantages of ungrafted and grafted methods of anterior vaginal prolapse repair. RECENT FINDINGS: Successful correction of anterior vaginal prolapse remains one of the most challenging aspects of pelvic reconstructive surgery. Anterior colporrhaphy is associated with an unacceptably high recurrence rate. Paravaginal repairs are technically more difficult to perform and may be associated with more complications. The low success rate has consequently led to more frequent use of grafts in anterior vaginal prolapse repair. Although retrospective case series of graft-reinforced anterior vaginal prolapse repair shows promising short-term success rates, mesh-related complications are of concern. SUMMARY: The goal of pelvic surgery should be restoration of anatomic support without deleterious effects on visceral and sexual function. Limited data are available on quality of life and sexual function following both traditional and graft-reinforced anterior vaginal prolapse surgery. Although mesh-reinforced repair is associated with lower short-term anatomic recurrence, the long-term durability and safety of mesh-reinforced repair is unknown. Further research is required to determine whether surgical technique and type of graft used impact surgical outcome and complications.     

改良盆底重建术与传统手术治疗盆腔器官脱垂的随访评价

目的:评价经阴道全子宫切除术加改良盆底重建术和经阴道全子宫切除术加阴道前后壁修补术治疗盆腔脏器脱垂的治疗效果。方法:对2007年4月至2011年4月盆腔脏器脱垂Ⅱ～Ⅳ度102例患者进行术后3个月、6个月、12个月、36个月随访,其中经阴道子宫切除术加改良盆底重建术(重建组)65例,经阴道子宫切除术加阴道前后壁修补术(传统组)37例。采用POP-Q分度法,Ⅱ度及Ⅱ度以上判定为复发。结果:重建组2例(3.08%)复发,传统组6例(16.21%)复发,两组复发率差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);重建组复发患者均合并网片侵蚀、外露,剪除外露网片并局部雌激素治疗后放置子宫托,目前疗效满意;传统组复发患者分别行子宫托治疗、改良盆底重建术、Prolift盆底重建术、阴道封闭术,目前疗效满意;重建组35例术后恢复性生活,传统组25例术后恢复性生活,性功能问卷评分均较术前下降(P<0.05),但两组术后性功能评分无显著差异(P>0.05)。结论:改良盆底重建术作为一种新术式,能更好地修补缺陷、实现结构重建和组织替代,其复发率低,尤其是对于Ⅲ～Ⅳ度脱垂患者较传统手术更具优势。术后复发患者首选子宫托治疗,传统组可行网片再次手术治疗,阴道封闭术为最后的选择方法。     

The efficacy of Marlex mesh in the repair of severe, recurrent vaginal prolapse of the anterior midvaginal wall

OBJECTIVE: The study assesses the efficacy and complications of Marlex mesh in repairing severe recurrent anterior vaginal wall prolapse. STUDY DESIGN: Twenty-four patients with two or more postsurgical recurrences of severe anterior vaginal wall prolapse were divided into control and treatment groups. Transvaginal repair was similar between groups except for reinforcement of the anterior vaginal wall with synthetic mesh. Two examiners graded preoperative and postoperative support over the following 2 years (K = 0.9). Fisher's exact test, log-linear analysis, and analysis of variance were used to compare categoric and continuous variables. RESULTS: Four patients in the control group and none in the treatment group had recurrent anterior vaginal wall prolapse (p < 0.05). Three patients had mesh-related complications. CONCLUSION: Repair with a synthetic mesh decreased the expected incidence of severe recurrent anterior vaginal prolapse but was associated with common complications related to synthetic mesh. Mesh reinforcement is an effective treatment for severe recurrent prolapse of the anterior midvaginal wall. (Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996;175:1472-5.)     

A long-term cohort study of surgery for recurrent prolapse comparing mesh augmented anterior repairs to anterior colporrhaphy

Background

There are safety concerns regarding the use of mesh in vaginal surgery with a call for long-term follow-up data. This study was designed to evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of vaginal repairs performed for recurrent cystocele using Perigee (non-absorbable trans-obturator) mesh.

Methods

A retrospective consecutive cohort of 48 women who underwent surgery for recurrent prolapse between March 2007 and December 2011 in a single centre was reviewed. Satisfaction was assessed using the patient global impression of improvement (PGI-I). Symptoms were assessed with the pelvic floor distress inventory (PFDI). Women were questioned regarding pain, sexual activity and pelvic floor surgery performed since the original procedure and examined for erosion. Women were compared to 25 controls from a consecutive cohort of repeat anterior colporrhapies.

Results

The mean length of follow-up was 6.5 years (78 months; range 48–106). Significantly more women in the mesh group reported that they were “much better” or “very much better” (69 vs 40% p?=?0.02). The rate of mesh erosion at follow-up was 11.6%. Two women in the mesh group required surgical excision of eroded mesh in the operating room (4%). The reoperation rate for a combination of de novo stress incontinence, recurrent prolapse and mesh exposure was similar in each group (33% mesh vs 32% native tissue).

Conclusions

A vaginal mesh repair using a non-absorbable trans-obturator mesh has improved satisfaction compared to an anterior colporrhaphy.

     

Incidence of recurrent cystocele after anterior colporrhaphy with and without concomitant transvaginal needle suspension

OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to compare the recurrent cystocele rate after anterior colporrhaphy versus anterior colporrhaphy performed in conjunction with transvaginal needle bladder neck suspension. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective chart review of all patients undergoing anterior colporrhaphy with and without needle bladder neck suspension over a 3-year period was conducted. Preoperatively all patients had symptomatic anterior vaginal wall relaxation. Patients undergoing concomitant needle suspension procedures had genuine stress incontinence. Twenty-seven patients underwent anterior colporrhaphy alone, and 40 patients underwent anterior colporrhaphy with needle suspension. Demographic data including age, parity, menopausal status, and use of estrogen replacement was collected for each group. The recurrence rate of anterior vaginal wall relaxation was determined for each group by reviewing standardized postoperative office notes. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the duration of follow-up between the two groups (13.2 months in the anterior repair group vs 13 months in the anterior repair-needle suspension group). However, a significant difference in recurrent cystocele rates was found between the two groups (7% [2/27] in the anterior repair group compared with 33%[13/40] in the anterior repair-needle suspension group, p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: The incidence of recurrent cystocele is significantly higher after anterior colporrhaphy with concomitant needle bladder neck suspension compared with anterior colporrhaphy alone. This difference may be related to the vaginal retropubic dissection at the time of transvaginal needle bladder neck suspension resulting in an iatrogenic paravaginal defect or denervation of the anterior vaginal wall. (Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996;175:1476-82.)     

经阴道植入TiLOOP网片的盆底重建术的临床疗效和安全性分析

目的:评价经阴道植入轻型钛化聚丙烯网片TiLOOP的盆底重建术的临床短期疗效和安全性。方法:回顾性分析南京医科大学附属无锡妇幼保健院2017年11月至2019年7月,以阴道前壁膨出Ⅲ~Ⅳ度为主的50例盆腔器官脱垂（POP）患者,对其实施经阴道植入TiLOOP网片的盆底重建术,其中自行裁剪TiLOOP网片的“协和式”盆底...     

Laparoscopic paravaginal repair of anterior compartment prolapse

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To assess the results of laparovaginal repair of anterior vaginal prolapse in terms of perioperative morbidity and repair durability. DESIGN: Longitudinal study of a consecutive series of women assessed with the pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POPQ) system before and after laparoscopic paravaginal repair of anterior vaginal prolapse (Canadian Task Force classification II-2). SETTING: University hospital in South Australia. PATIENTS: Two hundred twelve women undergoing laparoscopic paravaginal repair for anterior compartment prolapse, with average follow-up of 14.2 months and 10 (4.7%) lost to follow-up. INTERVENTIONS: All women underwent bilateral laparoscopic paravaginal repair that was combined with uterosacral hysteropexy or colpopexy in women with concomitant level I defects (n = 42) and supralevator repair in those with posterior fascia defects (n = 47). Recurrences were treated with graft-reinforced anterior colporrhaphy (n = 18). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Nine women (4.2%) had major complications, and there were 61 minor complications. The POPQ assessment on follow-up (mean 14.2 months) gave a prolapse cure of the laparoscopic repair of 76% (95% CI 70.7%-82.1%). Eighteen of 23 women with a residual central defect subsequently had a graft-reinforced anterior colporrhaphy, after a mean interval of 14 months, which increased the cure rate to 84% (95% CI 79.6%-89.3%). CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic paravaginal repair followed by graft-reinforced anterior colporrhaphy for central defects, when necessary, is associated with a low morbidity rate and achieves an anatomic cure rate greater than 80%.     

Combined anterior vaginal wall mesh with sacrospinous ligament fixation or with posterior intravaginal slingplasty for uterovaginal or vaginal vault prolapse

Objective

To evaluate outcomes of anterior vaginal wall mesh augmentation with concomitant sacrospinous ligament fixation (SSLF) or with concomitant posterior intravaginal slingplasty (IVS) for uterovaginal or vaginal vault prolapse.

Study design

Women with symptomatic uterovaginal or vaginal vault prolapse were randomly allocated to SSLF or IVS. All underwent concomitant anterior repair augmented with self-tailored multifilament polypropylene and polyglactin composite mesh. Before and 2, 12, 24 and 36 months after surgery, the outcome was assessed by examination and standard questions. The primary endpoint was anatomic recurrence of pelvic organ prolapse at stage II or beyond (−1 cm or greater) at any site of the vaginal wall. Secondary outcomes included perioperative and postoperative complications, symptom resolution, reoperation and mesh exposure.

Results

Twenty-two women were recruited from March 2003 to December 2005. At 3-year follow-up3 (2 posterior and 1 apical) out of 14 (21%) in the IVS group had anatomic recurrences of pelvic organ prolapse, and 1 anterior out of 8 (13%) in the SSLF group. Severe operative complications or reoperations did not occur. The proportions of symptomatic patients, including those with dyspareunia, did not differ between the groups. Erosion of the anterior multifilament mesh was found in 2 out of 22 cases (9%; 95% CI 3-28%).

Conclusion

At 3-year follow-up anterior repair reinforced with a composite mesh with concomitant sacrospinous ligament fixation or with concomitant posterior intravaginal slingplasty allowed feasible support in patients with severe pelvic organ prolapse.     

Transvaginal repair of genital prolapse with polypropylene mesh using a tension-free technique

Objectives

To assess the perioperative complications and short-term outcomes of prolapse repair using transvaginal polypropylene mesh.

Study design

Retrospective study. In the period from April 2007 to September 2009, 67 women underwent vaginal repair with implantation of a soft mesh manufactured by Gynecare.

Results

All the patients had a stage 3 or stage 4 prolapse. Total mesh was used in eight patients (11.9%), isolated anterior mesh in 36 patients (53.7%) and isolated posterior mesh in 23 patients (34.4%). We reported one intraoperative bladder injury and no other serious complications. At 3 months, all the 67 patients were available for follow-up. Vaginal erosion occurred in eight patients (11.9%), shrinkage of mesh in six patients (8.7%), granuloma without exposure in four patients (5.9%), de novo urinary incontinence in three patients (4.5%) and flatus incontinence in one patient (1.5%). Failure rate was 7.5% (recurrent prolapse stage 3 or 4, even asymptomatic).

Conclusion

Our study suggests that transvaginal polypropylene mesh applied with a tension-free technique is a safe and effective method with low intraoperative complications but with considerable potential postoperative morbidity.