Long-term effectiveness and safety of didanosine combined with lamivudine and efavirenz or nevirapine in antiretroviral-naive patients: a 9-year cohort study in Senegal

Objective The use of didanosine (ddI) in first‐line antiretroviral therapy has been recently promoted for resource‐limited settings. We therefore compared the long‐term effectiveness and safety of the regimen combining ddI, lamivudine, and efavirenz or nevirapine with that of the WHO‐recommended regimen of zidovudine (ZDV), lamivudine, and efavirenz or nevirapine in antiretroviral‐naïve patients in Senegal. Methods Observational cohort study of patients enrolled between January 2000 and April 2002 in the Senegalese antiretroviral drug access initiative. Multivariate analyses were performed to compare, between the ddI and ZDV groups, the proportion of patients with a viral load <500 copies/ml during follow‐up; the increase in the CD4 cell count; survival; treatment changes and severe adverse events. Results Of 151 patients, 71 received the ddI‐based treatment and 80 received the ZDV‐based treatment. Throughout follow‐up, 80–95% of patients had a viral load below 500 copies/ml in both the ddI and ZDV groups (P = 0.5). The CD4 cell count increased after treatment initiation from 176 to 497 cells/mm³ in the ddI group and from 176 to 567 cells/mm³ in the ZDV group (P > 0.3). The rate of death tended to be higher in the ddI group (P = 0.06). ddI was less commonly discontinued than ZDV (P = 0.03). Conclusion The combination of ddI, lamivudine, and efavirenz or nevirapine resulted in sustained viral suppression and immunological recovery.     

A comparison of the long‐term durability of nevirapine,efavirenz and lopinavir in routine clinical practice in Europe: a EuroSIDA study

Objectives

The durability of combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) regimens can be measured as time to discontinuation because of toxicity or treatment failure, development of clinical disease or serious long‐term adverse events. The aim of this analysis was to compare the durability of nevirapine, efavirenz and lopinavir regimens based on these measures.

Methods

Patients starting a nevirapine, efavirenz or lopinavir‐based cART regimen for the first time after 1 January 2000 were included in the analysis. Follow‐up started ≥3 months after initiation of treatment if viral load was <500 HIV‐1 RNA copies/mL. Durability was measured as discontinuation rate or development/worsening of clinical markers.

Results

A total of 603 patients (21%) started nevirapine‐based cART, 1465 (51%) efavirenz, and 818 (28%) lopinavir. After adjustment there was no significant difference in the risk of discontinuation for any reason between the groups on nevirapine and efavirenz (P=0.43) or lopinavir (P=0.13). Compared with the nevirapine group, those on efavirenz had a 48% (P=0.0002) and those on lopinavir a 63% (P<0.0001) lower risk of discontinuation because of treatment failure and a 31% (P=0.01) and 66% (P<.0001) higher risk, respectively, of discontinuation because of toxicities or patient/physician choice. There were no significant differences in the incidence of non‐AIDS‐related events, worsening anaemia, severe weight loss, increased aspartate aminotransferase (AST)/alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels or increased total cholesterol. Compared with patients on nevirapine, those on lopinavir had an 80% higher incidence of high‐density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol decreasing below 0.9 mmol/L (P=0.003), but there was no significant difference in this variable between those on nevirapine and those on efavirenz (P=0.39).

Conclusions

The long‐term durability of nevirapine‐based cART, based on risk of all‐cause discontinuation and development of long‐term adverse events, was comparable to that of efavirenz or lopinavir, in patients in routine clinical practice across Europe who initially tolerated and virologically responded to their regimen.     

Impact of weight gain with dolutegravir on antiretroviral adherence and viral suppression in four African countries

Objective

We hypothesized that total body weight (TBW) gain after switching antiretroviral therapy (ART) regimen to tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/lamivudine/dolutegravir (TLD) may negatively impact ART adherence and viral load (VL) and therefore sought to examine these associations.

Methods

The ongoing African Cohort Study (AFRICOS) enrols people with HIV at 12 facilities in Kenya, Nigeria, Tanzania and Uganda supported by The US President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief. Among ART-experienced participants who switched to TLD, we used multivariable multinomial logistic regression to examine associations between pre−/post-TLD changes in percentage TBW (≥5% gain, <5% change, ≥5% loss) and changes in self-reported ART adherence (0, 1–2, ≥3 days missed doses in past 30 days) and VL [(<50 copies/mL (undetectable), 50–999 copies/mL (detectable, but suppressed), ≥1000 copies/mL (unsuppressed)].

Results

Among 1508 participants, median time from starting TLD to follow-up was 9 months (interquartile range: 7–11). Overall, 438 (29.1%) participants experienced a TBW gain ≥5%, which was more common among females than among males (32.2% vs 25.2%, p = 0.005) and participants switching from efavirenz [32.0% vs nevirapine (19.9%) and boosted protease inhibitor (20.0%); p < 0.001]. Compared with a TBW change <5% [950 (63.0%) participants], TBW gain ≥5% was not significantly associated with more days with missed ART doses [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 0.77, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.48–1.23] or VL becoming detectable and/or unsuppressed (aOR = 0.69, 95% CI: 0.41–1.16).

Conclusions

Although a substantial proportion of participants experienced weight gain after switching to TLD, we did not identify a significant impact on adherence or virological outcomes.     

Nevirapine- versus efavirenz-based highly active antiretroviral therapy regimens in antiretroviral-naïve patients with advanced HIV infection

Objective

To compare virological and immunological responses to nevirapine (NVP)‐based and efavirenz (EFV)‐based highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) regimens in antiretroviral‐naïve patients with advanced HIV infection.

Methods

A retrospective observational cohort study was conducted on antiretroviral‐naïve HIV‐infected patients whose pretreatment CD4 cell counts were less than 100 cells/μL or whose viral loads were greater than 100 000 HIV‐1 RNA copies/mL.

Results

Baseline characteristics of patients in the NVP (n=24) and EFV (n=29) groups were not different. The proportion of patients with viral loads >100 000 copies/mL was higher in the EFV group. The probability of virological success estimated by the Kaplan‐Meier method showed that 3‐ and 6‐month success rates were 30.8% [95% confidence interval (CI): 16.7–52.2%] and 63.1% (95% CI: 44.7–81.3%) for the NVP group. The corresponding values were 41.2% (95% CI: 25.8–61.0%) and 62.9% (95% CI: 45.7–80.1%) for the EFV‐based group. The median success times of the two groups were about 4 and 3 months (P=0.678), respectively, for NVP and EFV. Cox's proportional hazard was used after adjusting for age, previous opportunistic infections (OIs), and viral load at baseline, and showed that patients who received the NVP‐based regimen had about 25% [hazard ratio (HR)=0.75, 95% CI: 0.37–1.51] less chance of virological success than patients who received the EFV‐based regimen (P=0.415). The median times to CD4≥100 cells/μL were 5.6 and 4.4 months for the NVP‐ and EFV‐based regimens, respectively (log‐rank test, P=0.144).

Conclusions

NVP‐ and EFV‐based HAART regimens as initial regimens in patients with advanced HIV infection are effective and comparable, in term of virological and immunological responses. However, further large‐scale randomized controlled clinical trials in this group of patients with advanced HIV infection are needed.

     

Combination nucleoside analog reverse transcriptase inhibitor(s) plus nevirapine, nelfinavir, or ritonavir in stable antiretroviral therapy-experienced HIV-infected children: week 24 results of a randomized controlled trial--PACTG 377. Pediatric AIDS Clinical Trials Group 377 Study Team

One hundred eighty-one antiretroviral-experienced, protease inhibitor-naive, clinically stable HIV-infected children between 4 months and 17 years of age were randomly assigned to receive one of four combination regimens to evaluate the change in plasma HIV RNA, safety, and tolerance when changing antiretroviral therapy to a protease inhibitor-containing combination regimen. All four regimens contained stavudine; in addition children received nevirapine plus ritonavir, lamivudine plus nelfinavir, nevirapine plus nelfinavir, or lamivudine plus nevirapine plus nelfinavir. Twelve additional children chose to receive stavudine plus lamivudine plus nelfinavir, with nelfinavir given bid, rather than tid as for the main regimens. Overall, 51% (89/176; 95% CI 43-58%) of the children on the randomized portion of the study had an HIV RNA response (< or =400 copies/ml) on at least two of the three HIV RNA determinations taken at Weeks 8, 12, and 16. At Week 24 the proportion of children with an HIV RNA response still on initial therapy was 47% (83/176; 95% CI 40-55%) and ranged from 41 to 61% for the four randomized treatment arms. Rash was frequently seen (27%) on the treatment arms containing nevirapine. At Week 24 64% (7/11, 95% CI 31-89%) of the children on the bid nelfinavir combination regimen were still on initial therapy with an HIV RNA response as compared with 46% (23/50; 95% CI 32-61%) on the corresponding tid nelfinavir combination regimen. A change in antiretroviral therapy to a protease inhibitor-containing regimen was associated with a virological response rate of approximately 50% for this patient population.     

Pharmacokinetic comparison of generic and trade formulations of lamivudine, stavudine and nevirapine in HIV-infected Malawian adults

BACKGROUND: The Malawian antiretroviral program uses generic Triomune (stavudine, lamivudine, and nevirapine). OBJECTIVE: To determine the pharmacokinetics and bioequivalence of generic and trade formulations of stavudine, lamivudine, and nevirapine in HIV-infected Malawians. METHODS: This randomized, open label, cross-over study comprised of six men and six women currently receiving Triomune-40 TM who were randomized to the generic or trade formulation of stavudine (40 mg twice daily), lamivudine (150 mg twice daily) and nevirapine (200 mg twice daily). After at least 21 days, the alternate formulation was administered. At the end of each period, six blood samples were collected over 8 h. Bioequivalence was achieved if the 90% confidence interval (CI) for the geometric mean ratio (GMR) of generic:trade formulations for maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) and the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) was within 0.8-1.25. RESULTS: Mean patient age, weight, and height were 38.4 years (SD, 7.7), 71.2 kg (SD, 7.0), and 164.8 cm (SD, 6.3), respectively. The GMR for stavudine, lamivudine, and nevirapine were 1.4 (90% CI, 1.2-1.7), 1.1 (90% CI, 0.8-1.6), and 0.9 (90% CI, 0.7-1.2), respectively, for Cmax; and 1.1 (90% CI, 1.0 1.2), 1.0 (90% CI, 0.7-1.3), and 0.9 (90% CI, 0.7-1.1), respectively, for AUC0-8h. Regardless of formulation, Malawians had higher nevirapine exposures compared with historical reports of Western HIV-infected patients. CONCLUSIONS: Although exposures were similar, Triomune did not meet the strict definition of bioequivalence for these drugs. Patients taking Triomune had notably higher stavudine Cmax values. Antiretroviral pharmacokinetics and bioequivalence of generic formulations should be evaluated in the populations in which they are being used.     

Performance of a World Health Organization first-line regimen (stavudine/lamivudine/nevirapine) in antiretroviral-naïve individuals in a Western setting

Objectives

In 2003, the World Health Organization (WHO) and Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS) introduced the ‘3 by 5 Initiative’ to treat 3 million individuals by the end of 2005. This study evaluates the time to treatment termination, viral load suppression, and detection of drug resistance among antiretroviral‐naïve individuals initiating stavudine/lamivudine/nevirapine (d4T/3TC/NVP) in British Columbia, Canada, to provide a context for future programme planning.

Methods

Primary outcome was time to treatment termination. Secondary outcome was time to viral suppression. Accumulation of drug resistance mutations was followed systematically in the first 145 individuals over 30 months. Cox proportional hazard regression identified factors associated with termination and suppression.

Results

312 antiretroviral‐naïve individuals initiated d4T/3TC/NVP between August 1996 and September 2003. Median follow‐up time was 26.5 months (interquartile range [IQR] 6.8–46.5). At a median of 12.4 months (IQR 4.3–33.3), 132 (42.3%) patients switched treatment, 53 (17.0%) stopped therapy and 26 (8.3%) died. Of 308 subjects with baseline viral load >500 copies/mL, 223 (72.4%) suppressed to ≤500 copies/mL at a median of 2.0 months. Among 145 (46.5%) individuals followed longitudinally, resistance mutations to NNRTI, 3TC, or other NRTI were detected in 11 (7.6%), six (4.1%) and four (2.8%) individuals after 12 months of therapy; and in 23 (15.9%), 17 (12.0%), and six (4.1%) individuals after 30 months.

Conclusions

The population requiring second‐line treatment was 30% at 12 months and 40% at 24 months; 20% had detectable drug resistance mutations by 30 months. While these results are from a Western setting, they illustrate the need to consider second‐ and third‐line approaches as antiretroviral treatment scale‐up continues in the developing world.

     

Severe hepatotoxicity associated with nevirapine use in HIV-infected subjects

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected South African patients (n=468) received blinded lamivudine or emtricitabine, stavudine, and either nevirapine or efavirenz (based on screening viral load). Baseline characteristics were analyzed in univariate and multivariate regression, to identify risk factors for hepatotoxicity (grade 3 or greater increase in serum aminotransferase levels). The occurrence of early hepatotoxicity was 17% in the nevirapine group and 0% in the efavirenz group and was balanced between the lamivudine and emtricitabine arms. Two subjects died of hepatic failure. Independent risk factors were body-mass index (BMI) <18.5, female sex, serum albumin level <35 g/L, mean corpuscular volume >85 fL, plasma HIV-1 RNA load <20,000 copies/mL, aspartate aminotransferase level <75 IU/L, and lactate dehydrogenase level <164 IU/L. The use of nevirapine in female patients with a low BMI should be discouraged.     

Switch from a first virologically effective protease inhibitor-containing regimen to a regimen containing efavirenz, nevirapine or abacavir

BACKGROUND: Treatment simplification in antiretroviral-experienced patients receiving protease inhibitor (PI)-containing antiretroviral regimens seems safe, but randomized trials have limited power to detect differences in virological rebound (VR) between different switch strategies. METHODS: From the French Hospital Database on HIV, we selected 2462 patients with undetectable viral load (VL) who switched from a first PI-containing antiretroviral combination (cART) to a combination containing efavirenz (EFV), nevirapine (NVP) or abacavir (ABC). Factors associated with VR and with immunological efficacy (gain of > or = 50 CD4(+) cells/microl) were identified by using Cox models. RESULTS: The 12-month Kaplan-Meier probabilities of VR were 6.8, 13.7 and 12.3% in patients switching to EFV-cART, NVP-cART and ABC-cART, respectively. Factors associated with VR were female sex, younger age, antiretroviral exposure before the first cART, time on first cART, higher VL at first cART initiation, a stavudine/didanosine backbone (rather than zidovudine/lamivudine) after the switch, and a switch to NVP or ABC [respective adjusted hazard ratio versus EFV: 1.53; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.21-1.94; and 1.53; 95% CI, 1.12-2.08]. When the analyses were restricted to patients who were antiretroviral-naive before their first cART, NVP (but not ABC) was associated with VR. Immunological outcomes did not differ among the three switch regimens. CONCLUSION: When VL is undetectable on a first PI-cART regimen, switching to an EFV-containing regimen is more likely to avoid VR than switching to an ABC or NVP-containing regimen. ABC may be an alternative to EFV for patients who were not exposed to antiretroviral before their first cART regimen, after checking for ABC resistance mutations.     

Maternal 12-month response to antiretroviral therapy following prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV type 1, Ivory Coast, 2003-2006.

OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to study the response to antiretroviral treatment among women exposed to single-dose nevirapine (NVP) and/or short-course zidovudine (ZDV; with or without lamivudine [3TC]) for the prevention of mother-to-child transmission of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. METHODS: All HIV type 1-infected women who initiated antiretroviral treatment with stavudine or ZDV, 3TC, and NVP or efavirenz were eligible for the MTCT-Plus program in Abidjan, Ivory Coast. Exposed women had received either single-dose NVP alone or short-course ZDV (with or without 3TC) plus single-dose NVP during previous pregnancy. Genotypic resistance testing was performed at week 4 after delivery. Virologic failure was defined as a plasma HIV RNA level >500 copies/mL 12 months after initiation of antiretroviral treatment. RESULTS: Among 247 women who received antiretroviral treatment, 109 (44%) were unexposed; 81 had received short-course ZDV with 3TC, as well as single-dose NVP; 5 had received short-course ZDV plus 3TC; 50 had received short-course ZDV plus single-dose NVP; and 2 had received single-dose NVP alone. No ZDV mutation was detected in the 115 women whose specimens were available for genotypic testing; 11 (15.1%) of 73 women with 3TC exposure who were tested after delivery had 3TC resistance mutations. Three (4.3%) of 69 women exposed to short-course ZDV and 3TC plus single-dose NVP and 16 (38.1%) of 42 women exposed to short-course ZDV plus single-dose NVP had NVP resistance mutations. Antiretroviral treatment was initiated a median of 21 months after the intervention to prevent mother-to-child HIV transmission (median CD4(+) T lymphocyte count, 188 cells/mm(3)). Month 12 virologic failure was identified in 42 (19.2%) of 219 women for whom data were available, and multivariate analysis revealed that it was associated with poor adherence to treatment (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 12.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.0-53.9), postpartum 3TC resistance mutations (aOR, 6.9; 95% CI, 1.1-42.9), and a baseline CD4(+) T lymphocyte count <200 cells/mm(3) (aOR, 0.3; 95% CI, 0.2-0.8). NVP resistance was not associated with virological failure (aOR, 1.8; 95% CI, 0.5-6.5). CONCLUSIONS: Our study found that poor adherence and 3TC resistance acquired after the intervention to prevent mother-to-child transmission of HIV infection were associated with virologic failure in women who initiated antiretroviral treatment.     

Insights into reasons for discontinuation according to year of starting first regimen of highly active antiretroviral therapy in a cohort of antiretroviral‐naïve patients

Objectives

The aim of the study was to determine whether the incidence of first‐line treatment discontinuations and their causes changed according to the time of starting highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) in an Italian cohort.

Methods

We included in the study patients from the Italian COhort Naïve Antiretrovirals (ICoNA) who initiated HAART when naïve to antiretroviral therapy (ART). The endpoints were discontinuation within the first year of ≥1 drug in the first HAART regimen for any reason, intolerance/toxicity, poor adherence, immunovirological/clinical failure and simplification. We investigated whether the time of starting HAART (stratified as ‘early’, 1997–1999; ‘intermediate’, 2000–2002; ‘recent’, 2003–2007) was associated with the probability of reaching the endpoints by a survival analysis.

Results

Overall, the 1‐year probability of discontinuation of ≥1 drug in the first regimen was 36.1%. The main causes of discontinuation were intolerance/toxicity (696 of 1189 patients; 58.5%) and poor adherence (285 of 1189 patients; 24%). The hazards for all‐reason change were comparable according to calendar period [2000–2002, adjusted relative hazard (ARH) 0.82, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.69–0.98; 2003–2007, ARH 0.94, 95% CI 0.76–1.16, vs. 1997–1999; global P‐value=0.08]. Patients who started HAART during the ‘recent’ period were less likely to change their initial regimen because of intolerance/toxicity (ARH 0.67, 95% CI 0.51–0.89 vs. ‘early’ period). Patients who started in the ‘intermediate’ and ‘recent’ periods had a higher risk of discontinuation because of simplification (ARH 15.26, 95% CI 3.21–72.45, and ARH 37.97, 95% CI 7.56–190.64, vs. ‘early’ period, respectively).

Conclusions

It seems important to evaluate reason‐specific trends in the incidence of discontinuation in order to better understand the determinants of changes over time. The incidence of discontinuation because of intolerance/toxicity has declined over time while simplification strategies have become more frequent in recent years. Intolerance/toxicity remains the major cause of drug discontinuation.     

Secure antiretroviral therapy delivery in a resource-limited setting: streamlined to minimize drug resistance and expense

Background

We report the design and analysis of a streamlined approach to the delivery of antiretroviral therapy (ART) that minimized risk for emergence of ART drug resistance (ART‐DR) in a resource‐limited setting.

Methods

The algorithm of care for persons with HIV comprised generic, fixed‐dose, twice‐daily stavudine, lamivudine and nevirapine (GPO‐VIR), scheduled and unannounced pill counts and measurement of viral load at months 6 and 18 after initiation of ART. We evaluated adherence as measured by pill counts, HIV suppression and programmatic costs.

Results

Over a 4‐year period, 214 of 330 patients (64.8%) were enrolled; baseline median CD4 count was 84 cells/μL. At month 1, nine patients (4.2%) discontinued GPO‐VIR because of skin rash. At month 6, 199 patients (93%) achieved viral load ≤400 HIV‐1 RNA copies/mL, with current alcohol use the sole predictor of treatment failure [adjusted Relative Risk (aRR)=1.67; 95% confidence interval=1.05–2.48; P<0.001]. Most patients (97%) with HIV suppression at month 6 had viral loads ≤50 copies/mL at month 18; all had ≥75% visit compliance and 192 (98%) had ≥75% adherence measured by pill counts. The estimated annual costs were $111.92 per patient for the pill counts, home visits and viral load measurement.

Conclusions

Secure ART delivery, while minimizing risk for non‐adherence and ART‐DR, is clinically and economically feasible in this resource‐limited setting.     

Risk factors for and clinical characteristics of severe hyperlactataemia in patients receiving antiretroviral therapy: a case–control study

Background

Symptomatic hyperlactataemia and lactic acidosis (SHLA) are potentially life‐threatening complications associated with stavudine (d4T), an antiretroviral therapy (ART) drug widely used in developing countries.

Methods

Cases comprised all symptomatic patients with measured lactates ≥5 mmol/L referred to a South African hospital between August 2003 and November 2005. Matched controls were selected according to facility and duration on ART.

Results

Seventy‐one cases and 142 controls were included in the study. The majority of cases presented between 6 and 18 months on ART. Female sex [adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 23.4; 95% confidence interval (CI) 4.0–136.6], a baseline weight between 60 and 75 kg (AOR 4.5; 95% CI 1.4–14.1) or, in particular, ≥75 kg (AOR 19.4; 95% CI 4.1–82.5) at ART initiation and gaining ≥6 kg in the first 3 months on therapy (AOR 3.5; 95% CI 1.3–9.5) were independent risk factors identifying patients who may subsequently develop SHLA. Weight loss of ≥2 kg (AOR 6.1; 95% CI 2.0–18.3), a rise in alanine aminotransferase (ALT) ≥10 U/L (AOR 3.1; 95% CI 1.1–8.9), the presence of at least one of three major symptoms (vomiting, nausea and abdominal pains) of SHLA (AOR 12.6; 95% CI 3.3–47.2) and peripheral neuropathy (AOR 3.4; 95% CI 1.1–9.8) were the clinical parameters that were most able to identify patients with early manifestations of SHLA.

Conclusions

This is the first case–control study for SHLA in Southern Africa. Given these findings, we advise that stavudine is avoided in overweight women. Weight loss, a rise in ALT, peripheral neuropathy and/or gastrointestinal symptoms should prompt healthcare workers to assess for SHLA, especially at between 6 and 18 months on ART.