Modulation by female sex hormones of the cannabinoid-induced catalepsy and analgesia in ovariectomized mice

Cannabinoids are psychoactive compounds with many pharmacological properties such as analgesia, sedation and catalepsy most of which are mediated by cannabinoid CB1 receptors. In the present study, we evaluated whether the ovarian sex hormones are involved in the cannabinoid-induced catalepsy and analgesia in ovariectomized female mice. Female NMRI mice (weighing 25-30 g) were divided into 3 main groups: unoperated, sham-operated and ovariectomized. Both the catalepsy and analgesia induced by different doses of the synthetic cannabinoid WIN 55,212-2 (2 and 4 mg/kg, i.p.) were examined in the groups in the presence or absence of the cannabinoid CB1 antagonist AM251 (0.5 mg/kg). We also evaluated effects of estradiol valerate (10 mg/kg) and progesterone (25 mg/kg) on catalepsy and analgesia induced by WIN 55,212-2 in ovariectomized mice. The antinociceptive effect of WIN 55,212-2 was significantly (P<0.01) enhanced in ovariectomized mice, which was prevented by pretreatment with estradiol but not by progesterone. There was no significant difference in the cannabinoid-induced catalepsy between control and ovariectomized mice. However, pretreatment with progesterone but not estradiol potentiated the cataleptic effect of low dose of WIN 55,212-2 (2 mg/kg) in ovariectomized mice (P<0.01). The present data demonstrated for the first time that ovarian sex steroids could modulate both cannabinoid-induced catalepsy and analgesia in female ovariectomized mice.     

Effects of pharmacological manipulations of cannabinoid receptors on severity of dystonia in a genetic model of paroxysmal dyskinesia

Previous studies have shown beneficial effects of the cannabinoid CB(1)/CB(2) receptor agonist (R)-4,5-dihydro-2-methyl-4-(4-morpholinylmethyl)-1-(1-naphthalenylcarbonyl)-6H-pyrrolo [3,2,1-ij]quinolin-6-one mesylate (WIN 55,212-2) in dt(sz) mutant hamsters, a model of idiopathic paroxysmal dystonia (dyskinesia). To examine the pathophysiological significance of the cannabinergic system in the dystonic syndrome, the effect of the cannabinoid CB(1) receptor antagonist N-piperidino-5-(4-chlorophenyl)-1-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-4-methyl-3-pyrazole-carboxamide (SR 141716A) on severity of dystonia was investigated in dt(sz) mutants which exhibit episodes of dystonic and choreoathetotic disturbances in response to mild stress. SR 141716A (5 and 10 mg/kg i.p.) failed to exert any effects on the severity of dystonia. While the antidystonic efficacy of WIN 55,212-2 (5 mg/kg i.p.) was confirmed, cannabidiol (which has low affinity to cannabinoid receptors) tended to delay the progression of dystonia only at a high dose (150 mg/kg i.p.). The antidystonic and cataleptic effects of WIN 55,212-2 (5 mg/kg i.p.) were completely antagonized by pretreatment with SR 141716A at doses of 2.5 mg/kg (catalepsy) and 10 mg/kg (antidystonic efficacy). These data indicate that the antidystonic efficacy of WIN 55,212-2 is selectively mediated via CB(1) receptors. The lack of prodystonic effects of SR 141716A together with only moderate antidystonic effects of WIN 55,212-2 suggests that reduced activation of cannabinoid CB(1) receptors by endocannabinoids is not critically involved in the dystonic syndrome. In view of previous pathophysiological findings in mutant hamsters, the antidystonic efficacy of WIN 55,212-2 can be explained by modulation of different neurotransmitter systems within the basal ganglia.     

Role of GLT-1 transporter activation in prevention of cannabinoid tolerance by the β-lactam antibiotic, ceftriaxone, in mice

Recently, it has been indicated that beta lactam antibiotics offer neuroprotection by increasing glutamate transporter expression. Furthermore, these antibiotics have been shown to prevent the development of tolerance and dependence to opioids. Since cannabinoid tolerance is known to be similar to opioids, our purpose was to examine the effect of ceftriaxone on the development of tolerance to WIN 55,212-2, a cannabinoid agonist. The tail flick test, a rectal thermometer, and the ring test were used for evaluating the degree of tolerance to the analgesic, hypothermic, and cataleptic effects of WIN 55,212-2, respectively. Within one week, animals became completely tolerant to analgesic, hypothermic and cataleptic effects of WIN 55,212-2 (6 mg/kg). Ceftriaxone, with its higher doses (100-200 mg/kg), attenuated the development of tolerance to the analgesic and hypothermic effects of WIN 55,212-2, but had no effect on its cataleptic action. Dihydrokainic acid (10 mg/kg), a GLT-1 transporter inhibitor, prevented this effect of ceftriaxone. Our results suggest that repeated treatment with ceftriaxone prevents the development of tolerance to the analgesic and hypothermic effects of cannabinoids, and GLT-1 activation appears to play a key role in this preventive effect of beta-lactam antibiotics.     

The role of cannabinoid receptors in intestinal motility, defaecation and diarrhoea in rats

We have studied the effects of the cannabinoid receptor agonists (R)-(+)[2,3-dihydro-5-methyl-3-(4-morpholinylmethyl)pyrrolo[1,2, 3-de]-1,4-benzoxazin-6-yl]-1-naphthalenylmethanone (WIN 55,212-2, 0. 3-5 mg/kg, i.p.) and (-)-cis-3-[2-hydroxy-4-(1, 1-dimethylheptyl)phenyl]-trans-4-(3-hydroxypropyl)cyclohexanol) (CP 55,940, 0.03-1 mg/kg, i.p.), the cannabinoid CB(1) receptor antagonist (N-piperidin-1-yl)-5-(4-chlorophenyl)-1-2, 4-dichlorophenyl)-4-methyl-1H-pyrazole-3-carboxamide (SR141716A, 0. 3-5 mg/kg, i.p.) and the cannabinoid CB(2) receptor antagonist N-[-(1S)-endo-1,3,3-trimethyl bicyclo [2.2.1] heptan-2-yl]-5-(4-chloro-3-methylphenyl)-1-(4-methylbenzyl)-pyrazo le- 3-carboxamide (SR144528, 1 mg/kg, i.p.) on intestinal motility, defaecation and castor-oil (1 ml/100 g rat, orally)-induced diarrhoea in the rat. SR141716A, but not SR144528, increased defaecation and upper gastrointestinal transit, while WIN 55,212-2 and CP 55,940 decreased upper gastrointestinal transit but not defaecation. WIN 55,212-3 (5 mg/kg), the less active enantiomer of WIN 55,212-2, was without effect. A per se non-effective dose of SR141716A (0.3 mg/kg), but not of SR144528 (1 mg/kg) or the opioid receptor antagonist, naloxone (2 mg/kg i.p.), counteracted the inhibitory effect of both WIN 55,212-2 (1 mg/kg) and CP 55,940 (0.1 mg/kg) on gastrointestinal motility. WIN 55,212-2 did not modify castor-oil-induced diarrhoea, while CP 55,940 produced a transient delay in castor-oil-induced diarrhoea at the highest dose tested (1 mg/kg), an effect counteracted by SR141715A (5 mg/kg). These results suggest that (i) intestinal motility and defaecation could be tonically inhibited by the endogenous cannabinoid system, (ii) exogenous activation of cannabinoid CB(1) receptors produces a reduction in intestinal motility in the upper gastrointestinal tract but not in defaecation, (iii) endogenous or exogenous activation of cannabinoid CB(2) receptors does not affect defaecation or intestinal motility and (iv) the cannabinoid receptor agonist, CP 55, 940, possesses a weak and transient antidiarrhoeal effect while the cannabinoid receptor agonist, WIN 55,212-2, does not possess antidiarrhoeal activity.     

Cannabinoid CB1-mediated inhibition of stress-induced gastric ulcers in rats

The effect of cannabinoid drugs (i.p.) on cold/restraint stress-induced gastric ulcers was studied in rats. The cannabinoid receptor agonist (WIN 55,212-2, 0.1-1 mg/kg), but not the less active isomer WIN 55,212-3 (1 mg/kg), reduced gastric ulceration. The protective effect of WIN 55,212-2 (1 mg/kg) was counteracted by the cannabinoid CB1 receptor antagonist SR141716A, but not by the cannabinoid CB2 receptor antagonist SR144528. These results indicate that the antiulcer effect of the cannabinoid receptor agonist WIN 55,212-2 is mediated by cannabinoid CB1 receptors.     

Calcium-dependent mechanisms of the reinstatement of nicotine-conditioned place preference by drug priming in rats

Reinstatement of drug-seeking behaviour in animals is relevant to relapse to drug taking in humans. We used the conditioned place preference version of the reinstatement model to investigate the establishment, extinction, reinstatement and cross-reinstatement of nicotine-induced place conditioning in rats. Nicotine produced a place preference to the compartment paired with its injections during conditioning (0.5 mg/kg, i.p., three drug sessions). Once established, nicotine place preference was extinguished by repeated training. Following this extinction phase, nicotine-experienced rats were challenged with nicotine (0.5 mg/kg, i.p.), a cannabinoid receptor agonist WIN55,212-2 (0.5 mg/kg, i.p.), ethanol (0.5 g/kg, i.p.) or d-amphetamine (2 mg/kg, i.p.). The priming injections of nicotine, WIN55,212-2 and ethanol, but not of d-amphetamine renewed a preference for the compartment previously paired with nicotine. Finally, we examined the influence of the calcium channel antagonists, nimodipine (5 and 10 mg/kg, i.p.) and flunarizine (5 and 10 mg/kg, i.p.), on the reinstatement of nicotine place conditioning induced by WIN55,212-2 and ethanol. It was shown that the calcium channel blockers attenuated the reinstatement of nicotine-conditioned response induced by both drugs. As reinstatement of drug-seeking is a factor for the development of dependence, the L-type calcium channel antagonists may be useful in the relapse-prevention phase of addiction treatment, including cannabinoid, ethanol, and/or nicotine dependence.     

Defaecation, intestinal fluid accumulation and motility in rodents: implications of cannabinoid CB1 receptors

We have studied the effect of SR141716A (0.1–5 mg/kg, i.p.), a cannabinoid CB₁ receptor antagonist, and WIN (0.1–5 mg/kg, i.p.), a cannabinoid receptor agonist, on acute defaecation and gastrointestinal transit in mice and on intraluminal fluid accumulation in the rat small intestine. SR141716A increased while WIN 55,212-2 decreased defaecation, gastrointestinal transit and fluid accumulation. A per se non-effective dose of SR141716A (0.3 mg/kg) counteracted the inhibitory effect of WIN 55,212-2 (1 mg/kg) on gastrointestinal functions studied. The effect of SR141716 on both intestinal fluid accumulation in rats and gastrointestinal transit in mice was inhibited by atropine (1 mg/kg, i.p.), but not by hexamethonium (1 mg/kg, s.c.), SR140333 (20 μg/kg, i.p.) or SR48968 (20 μg/kg, i.p.), antagonists of NK₁ and NK₂ receptors, respectively. These results suggest that intestinal fluid accumulation and motility are inhibited by endogenous cannabinoid(s) acting at the cannabinoid CB₁ receptors. This effect may be mediated by mechanisms involving muscarinic cholinoceptors. Received: 13 July 1998 / Accepted: 25 September 1998     

Inhibitory effect of the cannabinoid receptor agonist WIN 55,212-2 on pentagastrin-induced gastric acid secretion in the anaesthetized rat

The effect of the cannabinoid (CB) receptor agonist WIN 55,212-2 on gastric acid secretion was studied in the anaesthetized rat after stimulation with pentagastrin. WIN 55,212-2 (0.5-2 mg/kg, i.v.) was inactive on basal secretion but caused a marked inhibition (80%) of the acid secretion stimulated by pentagastrin (10 microg/kg, i.v.). The enantiomer WIN 55,212-3 (1-3 mg/kg, i.v.) did not significantly modify basal or pentagastrin-induced acid secretion. The inhibitory effect of WIN 55,212-2 against pentagastrin was prevented by the administration of the selective cannabinoid CB1 receptor antagonists SR141716A (1 mg/kg, i.v.) and LY320135 (1 mg/kg, i.v.); by contrast, the CB2 receptor antagonist SR144528 (0.3-1 mg/kg, i.v.) was without effect. The selective CB2 receptor agonist JWH-015 (0.1-10 mg/kg, i.v.) was inactive on the increase of acid output stimulated by pentagastrin. These results suggest that the inhibitory effect of WIN 55,212-2 on pentagastrin-stimulated acid secretion in the anaesthetized rat is mediated by specific cannabinoid receptors. Moreover, the antagonism of WIN 55,212-2-induced effects by the selective CB1 receptor antagonists SR141716A and LY320135 together with the ineffectiveness of both the CB2 receptor agonist JWH-015 and the CB2 receptor antagonist SR144528 indicate that CB1 receptor subtypes are predominantly involved in the antisecretory effect of WIN 55,212-2.     

Cannabinoid CB1 receptors mediate the effects of dipyrone

Dipyrone is a non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drug used primarily as an analgesic and antipyretic. Some hypothesize that dipyrone activity can modulate other pathways, including endocannabinoid signalling. Thus, the aim of the present study was to evaluate the possible role of endocannabinoids in mediating dipyrone activity. This study is based on the tetrad effects of cannabinoids, namely an antinociceptive and cataleptic state, hypolocomotion and hypothermia. Dipyrone (500 mg/kg, i.p.) treatment decreased locomotor activity, increased the latency to a thermal analgesic response and induced a cataleptic and hypothermic state. These reactions are similar to the tetrad effects caused by the cannabinoid agonist WIN 55,212‐2 (3 mg/kg, i.p.). The cannabinoid CB₁ receptor antagonist AM251 (10 mg/kg, i.p.) reversed the effects of dipyrone on locomotor activity, the cataleptic response and thermal analgesia. Both AM251 (10 mg/kg, i.p.) and the transient receptor potential vanilloid 1 (TRPV1) antagonist capsazepine (10 mg/kg, i.p.) accentuated the reduction in body temperature caused by dipyrone. However, the CB₂ receptor antagonist AM630 did not alter the hypothermic response to dipyrone. These results indicate involvement of the endocannabinoid system, especially CB₁ receptors, in the analgesic and cataleptic effects of dipyrone, as well as hypolocomotion. However, cannabinoid receptors and TRPV1 were not involved in the hypothermic effects of dipyrone. We hypothesize that the mechanism of action of dipyrone may involve inhibition of cyclo‐oxygenase and fatty acid amide hydrolase, which together provide additional arachidonic acid as substrate for endocannabinoid synthesis or other related molecules. This increase in endocannabinoid availability enhances CB₁ receptor stimulation, contributing to the observed effects.     

Inhibitory effect of cannabinoid agonists on gastric emptying in the rat

We have studied the effect of WIN 55,212-2 (a psychoactive cannabinoid agonist), cannabinol (a nonpsychoactive cannabinoid agonist), SR141716A, a cannabinoid CB1 antagonist, and SR144528, a cannabinoid CB2 antagonist, on gastric emptying in the rat. WIN 55,212-2 (0.1-5 mg/kg, i.p.) and cannabinol (0.1-25 mg/kg, i.p.) dose-dependently delayed gastric emptying while SR141716A (1 mg/kg and 5 mg/kg) and SR144528 (1 mg/kg) were without effect. SR141716A (1 mg/kg), but not SR144528 (1 mg/kg), counteracted the inhibitory effect of the two cannabinoid agonists. These results suggest that cannabinoid agonists delay gastric emptying through activation of cannabinoid CB1 receptors, while the endogenous cannabinoid system does not seem to modulate gastric motility.     

Increased sensitivity of adolescent spontaneously hypertensive rats, an animal model of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, to the locomotor stimulation induced by the cannabinoid receptor agonist WIN 55,212-2

Converging evidence points to adolescence as a critical period for the onset of a wide range of neuropsychiatric disorders, including attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and drug abuse. Spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR) are generally considered to be a suitable genetic model for the study of ADHD, since they display hyperactivity, impulsivity, poorly sustained attention, cognitive deficits and increased novelty seeking. Despite the high prevalence of ADHD among adolescents, studies using SHR have mainly been performed on adult animals. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of acute intraperitoneal (i.p.) administration of the cannabinoid receptor agonist WIN 55,212-2 (0.25-2.5 mg/kg) on locomotor activity and anxiety-like behavior in male adolescent and adult SHR and Wistar rats using the open field and elevated plus-maze tests. WIN 55,212-2 at doses of 0.25 and 1.25 mg/kg (i.p.) selectively promoted locomotor stimulation in adolescent SHR in the open field, but not in adult SHR or Wistar rats (regardless of age). The effect of WIN 55,212-2 (0.25 mg/kg, i.p.) on locomotion of adolescent SHR was reversed by pretreatment with the selective cannabinoid CB1 receptor antagonist AM 251 (0.25 mg/kg, i.p.). Moreover, although the present doses of WIN 55,212-2 had no effect on anxiety-related behaviors in any of the animal groups evaluated in the open field (central locomotion) or elevated plus-maze (time and entries in open arms), the highest dose of WIN 55,212-2 tested (2.5 mg/kg, i.p.) significantly decreased the number of closed-arm entries (an index of locomotor activity) of adolescent rats of both the Wistar and SHR strains in the elevated plus-maze. The present results indicate strain- and age-related effects of cannabinoids on locomotor activity in rats, extending the notion that adolescence and ADHD represent risk factors for the increased sensitivity to the effects of drugs.     

Involvement of kappa/dynorphin system in WIN 55,212-2 self-administration in mice.

Self-administration procedures have not yet provided evidence that freely moving mice can reliably acquire and maintain an operant behavior to self-administer cannabinoid agonists. The aim of the present work was to establish a model of cannabinoid operant intravenous self-administration in freely moving mice given the relevance of this species for the use of genetically modified animals. In addition, the possible involvement of the kappa/dynorphin system in cannabinoid self-administration was evaluated by using pro-dynorphin knockout mice. Outbred CD1 wild-type mice as well as pro-dynorphin knockout and wild-type mice were trained to self-administer the cannabinoid receptor agonist WIN 55,212-2 under an FR1 schedule of reinforcement. Two cannabinoid training doses (6.25 and 12.5 microg/kg/infusion) were used in the acquisition studies in outbred mice. Animals acquired a reliable operant responding to self-administer WIN 55,212-2 (12.5 microg/kg/infusion), but required as many as 15 sessions to attain this behavior. Interestingly, when a previous injection of WIN 55,212-2 (0.1 mg/kg, i.p.) was administered in the home-cage 24 h before the first session, mice acquired operant responding for cannabinoid self-administration by the fourth session. When the kappa-opioid agonist antagonist nor-binaltorphimine (5 mg/kg s.c.) was administered 4 h before the first session, the time required to acquire a reliable cannabinoid self-administration was also significantly reduced. Finally, a shift to the left in the dose-intake curve to self-administer WIN 55,212-2 was observed in pro-dynorphin knockout mice when compared to wild-type mice. These results indicate that the activation of the kappa/dynorphin opioid system after WIN 55,212-2 administration could counteract cannabinoid rewarding effects.     

Cannabinoid agonist WIN 55,212-2 prevents the development of paclitaxel-induced peripheral neuropathy in rats. Possible involvement of spinal glial cells

Spinal glial activation contributes to the development and maintenance of chronic pain states, including neuropathic pain of diverse etiologies. Cannabinoid compounds have shown antinociceptive properties in a variety of neuropathic pain models and are emerging as a promising class of drugs to treat neuropathic pain. Thus, the effects of repeated treatment with WIN 55,212-2, a synthetic cannabinoid agonist, were examined throughout the development of paclitaxel-induced peripheral neuropathy. Painful neuropathy was induced in male Wistar rats by intraperitoneal (i.p.) administration of paclitaxel (1mg/kg) on four alternate days. Paclitaxel-treated animals received WIN 55,212-2 (1mg/kg, i.p.) or minocycline (15 mg/kg, i.p.), a microglial inhibitor, daily for 14 days, simultaneous with the antineoplastic. The development of hypersensitive behaviors was assessed on days 1, 7, 14, 21 and 28 following the initial administration of drugs. Both the activation of glial cells (microglia and astrocytes) at day 29 and the time course of proinflammatory cytokine release within the spinal cord were also determined. Similar to minocycline, repeated administration of WIN 55,212-2 prevented the development of thermal hyperalgesia and mechanical allodynia in paclitaxel-treated rats. WIN 55,212-2 treatment also prevented spinal microglial and astrocytic activation evoked by paclitaxel at day 29 and attenuated the early production of spinal proinflammatory cytokines (interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-6 and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α). Our results confirm changes in the reactivity of glial cells during the development of peripheral neuropathy induced by paclitaxel and support a preventive effect of WIN 55,212-2, probably via glial cells reactivity inactivation, on the development of this neuropathy.     

Agmatine and a cannabinoid agonist, WIN 55212-2, interact to produce a hypothermic synergy

Agmatine blocks morphine withdrawal symptoms and enhances morphine analgesia in rats. Yet, the role of agmatine in the pharmacological effects of other abused drugs has not been investigated. The present study investigates the effect of agmatine administration on the hypothermic response to cannabinoids. Hypothermia is an effective endpoint because cannabinoid agonists produce a rapid, reproducible, and significant decrease in body temperature that is abolished by cannabinoid CB(1) receptor antagonists. WIN 55212-2, a cannabinoid agonist, was administered to rats by itself and with agmatine. WIN 55212-2 (1, 2.5, 5 and 10 mg/kg, i.m.) caused a significant hypothermia. Agmatine (10, 25 and 50 mg/kg, i.p.) was ineffective. For combined administration, agmatine (50 mg/kg, i.p.) enhanced the hypothermic effect of WIN 55212-2 (1, 2.5, 5 and 10 mg/kg, i.m.). The enhancement was strongly synergistic, indicated by a 2.7-fold increase in the relative potency of WIN 55212-2. The central administration of agmatine (25 and 50 mug/rat, i.c.v.) significantly increased the hypothermic effect of WIN 55212-2 (2.5 mg/kg, i.m.). This indicates that agmatine acts through a central mechanism to augment cannabinoid-evoked hypothermia. Idazoxan (2 mg/kg, i.p.), an imidazoline antagonist, blocked the enhancement by agmatine, thus suggesting that imidazoline receptor activation is required for agmatine to enhance cannabinoid-evoked hypothermia. The present data reveal that agmatine and a cannabinoid agonist interact to produce a hypothermic synergy in rats. These results show that agmatine acts in the brain and via imidazoline receptors to enhance cannabinoid-evoked hypothermia.     

Role of different brain structures in the behavioural expression of WIN 55,212-2 withdrawal in mice

We have evaluated several responses induced by the cannabinoid agonist WIN 55,212-2 related to its addictive properties, including rewarding effects and the development of physical dependence in mice. Moreover, we have studied the specific involvement of several brain regions with high density of CB1 cannabinoid receptors, such as striatum, hippocampus, amygdala and cerebellum, in the behavioural expression of SR 141716A-precipitated WIN 55,212-2 withdrawal. The systemic administration of the CB1 receptor antagonist SR 141716A (10 mg kg(-1), s.c.) precipitated behavioural signs of withdrawal in mice chronically treated with WIN 55,212-2 (1 and 2 mg kg(-1), intraperitoneal (i.p.)), revealing the development of physical dependence. The microinjection of SR 141716A (1.5 and 3 micrograms) into the cerebellum induced severe manifestations of abstinence in mice dependent on WIN 55,212-2 (1 mg kg(-1), i.p.). Out of 10 signs evaluated, seven were statistically significant: wet dog shakes, body tremor, paw tremor, piloerection, mastication, genital licks and sniffing. When the cannabinoid antagonist was administered into the hippocampus and the amygdala, a moderate but significant withdrawal syndrome was also observed. However, no signs of abstinence were induced when SR 141716A was microinjected into the striatum. WIN 55,212-2 produced rewarding effects in the place-conditioning paradigm in mice pre-exposed to a priming injection of the drug. These results show a reliable behavioural model to reveal rewarding effects and physical dependence induced by the repeated administration of WIN 55,212-2 in mice. The cerebellum and to a lesser extent the hippocampus and the amygdala participate in the behavioural expression of cannabinoid withdrawal.     

Agmatine enhances cannabinoid action in the hot-plate assay of thermal nociception

Agmatine–cannabinoid interactions are supported by the close association between cannabinoid CB₁ receptors and agmatine immunoreactive neurons and evidence that shared brain mechanisms underlie the pharmacological effects of agmatine and cannabinoid agonists. In the present study, we used the hot-plate assay of thermal nociception to determine if agmatine alters cannabinoid action through activation of imidazoline sites and/or alpha₂-adrenoceptors. WIN 55212-2 (1, 2 or 3 mg/kg, i.p.) or CP55,940 (1, 2 or 3 mg/kg, i.p.) administration increased hot-plate response latency. Agmatine (50 or 100 mg/kg, i.p.) was ineffective. Administration of agmatine (50 mg/kg, i.p.) with WIN 55212-2 (1, 2 or 3 mg/kg, i.p.) or CP55,940 (1, 2 or 3 mg/kg, i.p.) produced response-latency enhancement. Regression analysis indicated that agmatine increased the potency of WIN 55212-2 and CP55,940 by 3- and 4.4-fold, respectively, indicating synergy for both drug interactions. Idazoxan, a mixed imidazoline site/alpha₂-adrenoceptor antagonist, but not yohimbine (5 mg/kg, i.p.), a selective alphia₂-adrenoceptor antagonist, blocked response-latency enhancement produced by a combination of WIN 55212-2 (2 mg/kg) and agmatine. Response-latency enhancement produced by WIN 55212-2 (2 mg/kg) was blocked by SR 141716A (5 mg/kg, i.p.), a cannabinoid CB₁ receptor antagonist; attenuated by idazoxan (2 and 5 mg/kg); and not affected by yohimbine (5 mg/kg). These results demonstrate a synergistic interaction between agmatine and cannabinoid agonists and suggest that agmatine administration enhances cannabinoid action in vivo.     

Cannabinoid agonists but not inhibitors of endogenous cannabinoid transport or metabolism enhance the reinforcing efficacy of heroin in rats.

Accumulating evidence suggests that the endogenous cannabinoid system is involved in the reinforcing effects of heroin. In rats intravenously self-administering heroin, we investigated effects of cannabinoid CB1 receptor agonists and compounds that block transport or metabolism of the endogenous cannabinoid anandamide. The natural cannnabinoid CB1 receptor agonist delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC, 0.3-3 mg/kg i.p.) did not alter self-administration of heroin under a fixed-ratio one (FR1) schedule, except at a high 3 mg/kg dose which decreased heroin self-administration. Under a progressive-ratio schedule, however, THC dose-dependently increased the number of 50 mug/kg heroin injections self-administered per session and the maximal ratio completed (break-point), with peak increases at 1 mg/kg THC. In addition, 1 mg/kg THC increased break-points and injections self-administered over a wide range of heroin injection doses (25-100 microg/kg), indicating an increase in heroin's reinforcing efficacy and not its potency. The synthetic cannabinoid CB1 receptor agonist WIN55,212-2 (0.3-3 mg/kg i.p.) had effects similar to THC under the progressive-ratio schedule. In contrast, AM-404 (1-10 mg/kg i.p.), an inhibitor of transport of anandamide, and URB-597 (0.01-0.3 mg/kg i.p.), an inhibitor of the enzyme fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH) that degrades anandamide, or their combination, did not increase reinforcing efficacy of heroin at any dose tested. Thus, activation of cannabinoid CB1 receptors facilitates the reinforcing efficacy of heroin and this appears to be mediated by interactions between cannabinoid CB1 receptors and mu-opioid receptors and their signaling pathways, rather than by an opioid-induced release of endogenous cannabinoids.     

Amphetamine effects on dopamine levels and behavior following cannabinoid exposure during adolescence

The cannabis gateway hypothesis purports that early exposure to cannabis is a risk factor for subsequent use of other addictive drugs, e.g., psychostimulants. Neurobiological sensitization, consistent with a gateway hypothesis, was currently studied in regard to amphetamine response. Rats were exposed to the cannabinoid receptor agonist WIN 55,212-2 [(R)-(+)-[2,3-dihydro-5-methyl-3-(4-morpholinylmethyl)pyrrolo[1,2,3-de]-1,4-benzoxazin-6-yl]-1-naphthalenylmethanone] 1.25 mg/kg, intraperitoneally; i.p. for 5 days during early adolescence. Amphetamine (0.5 mg/kg, i.p.) or WIN 55,212-2 (1.25 mg/kg, i.p.) was administered in late adolescence and in vivo dopamine levels were simultaneously measured in the nucleus accumbens. Locomotor and stereotyped behaviors were also monitored in rats pretreated with WIN 55,212-2 (0.625, 1.25 or 2.5 mg/kg) or Delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (0.75, 1.5 or 3.0 mg/kg, i.p.) for 5 days during early adolescence and challenged with amphetamine (0.5 or 2.0 mg/kg) in late adolescence or as adults. Pretreatment with WIN 55,212-2 or Delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol during early adolescence did not alter the dopaminergic or behavioral responses to amphetamine in adolescence or adulthood. In conclusion, these findings do not support the cannabis gateway hypothesis in regard to subsequent amphetamine exposure.     

Agmatine enhances cannabinoid action in the hot-plate assay of thermal nociception

Agmatine–cannabinoid interactions are supported by the close association between cannabinoid CB₁ receptors and agmatine immunoreactive neurons and evidence that shared brain mechanisms underlie the pharmacological effects of agmatine and cannabinoid agonists. In the present study, we used the hot-plate assay of thermal nociception to determine if agmatine alters cannabinoid action through activation of imidazoline sites and/or alpha₂-adrenoceptors. WIN 55212-2 (1, 2 or 3 mg/kg, i.p.) or CP55,940 (1, 2 or 3 mg/kg, i.p.) administration increased hot-plate response latency. Agmatine (50 or 100 mg/kg, i.p.) was ineffective. Administration of agmatine (50 mg/kg, i.p.) with WIN 55212-2 (1, 2 or 3 mg/kg, i.p.) or CP55,940 (1, 2 or 3 mg/kg, i.p.) produced response-latency enhancement. Regression analysis indicated that agmatine increased the potency of WIN 55212-2 and CP55,940 by 3- and 4.4-fold, respectively, indicating synergy for both drug interactions. Idazoxan, a mixed imidazoline site/alpha₂-adrenoceptor antagonist, but not yohimbine (5 mg/kg, i.p.), a selective alphia₂-adrenoceptor antagonist, blocked response-latency enhancement produced by a combination of WIN 55212-2 (2 mg/kg) and agmatine. Response-latency enhancement produced by WIN 55212-2 (2 mg/kg) was blocked by SR 141716A (5 mg/kg, i.p.), a cannabinoid CB₁ receptor antagonist; attenuated by idazoxan (2 and 5 mg/kg); and not affected by yohimbine (5 mg/kg). These results demonstrate a synergistic interaction between agmatine and cannabinoid agonists and suggest that agmatine administration enhances cannabinoid action in vivo.     

Effects of SR141716 and WIN 55,212-2 on tolerance to ethanol in rats using the acute and rapid procedures

Rationale Our previous findings have shown rapid cross-tolerance between ethanol and Δ⁹-tetrahydrocannabinol and that intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection of cannabinoid receptor type 1 (CB1R) antagonist SR141716 (SR) does not interfere with tolerance to either of these drugs in mice. Objectives This study investigates the effects of SR, alone or in combination with the CB receptor agonist WIN 55,212-2 (WIN), on the development of acute and rapid tolerance to the incoordinating effect of ethanol in rats. Materials and methods Male Wistar rats received SR, through i.p. (0.5–2.0 mg/kg) or intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) injections (0.5–4.0 μg), alone or together with WIN (1.0 μg, i.c.v.), in combination with ethanol (2.7 g/kg, i.p.). Another group received WIN (1.0 μg, i.c.v.) in combination with ethanol (2.3 g/kg), and the rats were tested for motor coordination. Rapid tolerance was assessed 24 h later by administering ethanol to all animals and retesting them under the same dose regimen. Acute tolerance was evaluated for 75 min after ethanol (3.0 g/kg, i.p.) in animals treated with SR or WIN (i.c.v.). Results The reduced motor impairment on day 2 (i.e., rapid tolerance) was blocked by SR (i.p. and i.c.v.). WIN (1.0 μg, i.c.v.) facilitated rapid tolerance and also prevented the blockade of rapid tolerance by SR (1.0 μg, i.c.v.). In the acute tolerance procedure, SR did not affect the motor incoordination induced by ethanol. Conclusions The results suggest that the endocannabinoid system may contribute to the development of rapid tolerance to ethanol.