Genetic instability of in vitro cell lines: Implications for genetic toxicity testing

Cell line-based in vitro testing has been widely used as an important component of the genotoxicity testing battery; however, the use of cell lines is constrained by several limitations, including the genetic drift and variability. A study recently reported in the literature comprehensively examined genomic changes in a large number of cell lines and reported extensive genetic variations within the same cell lines across passage numbers and laboratories, even for single-cell derived subclones. The primary objective of this communication is to raise awareness and stimulate discussion within the genotoxicity testing community of the extent of genetic variability of cell lines in general and how these variables could potentially influence the results and reproducibility of genotoxicity testing. Meanwhile, some recommendations for good cell culture practices are highlighted to mitigate, at least to some extent, the concern about genetic variation. Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 60:559–562, 2019. © 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

GeneTests-GeneClinics: genetic testing information for a growing audience

The development and usage of two companion NIH-funded genetic testing information databases, GeneTests (www.genetests.org) and GeneClinics (www.geneclinics.org), now merged into one web site, reflect the steadily increasing use of genetic testing and the expanding audience for genetic testing information. Established in 1993 as Helix, a genetics laboratory directory of approximately 110 listings, GeneTests has grown into a database of over 900 tests for inherited diseases, a directory of over 500 international laboratories, a directory of over 1,000 U.S. and international genetics clinics, and a resource for educational/teaching materials and reports of summary genetic test data. GeneClinics, founded in 1997 as an expert-authored, peer-reviewed, disease-specific knowledge base relating genetic testing to patient care, has grown steadily, now containing over 130 expert-authored, peer-reviewed full-text entries relating genetic testing information to diagnosis, management, and genetic counseling of specific inherited diseases. In spring 2001 the two databases were merged and in October 2001 the two web sites were merged for the purpose of seamless navigation into the GeneTests-GeneClinics site (www.genetests.org or www.geneclinics.org); the GeneClinics knowledge base was renamed "GeneReviews" to avoid confusion with the U.S. and international clinic directories. As genetic testing has moved steadily out of research venues and into routine medical practice, the user audience for these databases has become international and expansive and includes healthcare providers, patients, educators, policy makers, and the media. The use of these combined resources has grown to approximately 3,200 visits/day.     

A method for testing the toxicity of temporary crown and bridge materials

A realistic method for testing the toxicity of a temporary crown and bridge material in vivo is described. The results are compared with a previous study. It is stressed that temporary crown and bridge materials should never be used as a temporary filling material.     

Parental perceptions of genetic testing for children with autism spectrum disorders

Children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) routinely undergo genetic testing (GT) to identify the causative genetic etiology of their ASD. As there are questions about the impact of GT beyond clinical diagnosis, we conducted a mixed methods study to assess the perceived benefits of GT by exploring factors that lead parents to pursue these tests and the benefits experienced. Respondents were part of a pretest or posttest group. The pretest group (N = 22) expressed intent to pursue GT and the posttest group (N = 32) had undergone GT and received results at least 3 months prior to completing the survey. Responses were compared between and within groups. Free text responses were coded for themes and selection questions were analyzed using Fisher's exact tests. Our results demonstrate significant differences between the groups with participants in the pretest group more likely to choose “increased access to therapies” (p = 0.026) and “improved healthcare” (p < 0.000) as reasons to pursue testing. Benefits were also significantly different with “improved healthcare” (p = 0.009), “improved access to services” (p = 0.012), and “improved access to therapies” (p = 0.003) more frequently anticipated by the pretest group than reported by the posttest group. A relationship between GT and clinical management changes was reported by 34.4–50.0% of the posttest group. Among that group, genetic result type (positive, negative, or variant of uncertain significance) was associated with differing perceived benefits of testing. Thematic analysis revealed increased knowledge and coping as reported benefits in both groups. Our findings indicate a discrepancy between parental expectations and experiences of GT. Comprehensive pretest and posttest genetic counseling are necessary to improve information retention, address potential outcomes, and set expectations of GT for parents of children with ASD.     

Psychological and social determinants of women's decisions to undergo genetic counseling and testing for breast cancer

This study examined the demand for breast cancer genetic testing and counseling among Canadian women diagnosed with breast cancer under the age of 50, together with some of the factors predicting both their intentions to be tested and the degree to which they act on their intentions. Participants were 110 women under the age of 50 and comprised of two groups: 1) women diagnosed with breast cancer (BC, n = 60): and 2) an index group of unaffected women from the general population (GP, n = 50). All participants completed a survey that addressed family history of breast and other cancers, demographic variables, knowledge and attitudes about breast cancer, and genetic testing. Members of the BC group were offered genetic counseling and testing for BRCA1 and BRCA2 free of charge. Overall, 60% of participants indicated they would like the test, and 40% either did not want it or were uncertain. Seventy-two percent of women in the BC group wanted to be tested. Of these, only 49% had actually contacted the genetic counselor about testing at follow-up 3-15 months later. Intention to be tested was associated with presence of breast cancer, greater perceived benefits of testing, fewer perceived 'costs' of testing, and higher levels of concern about the risk of relatives developing breast cancer. Actual arranging to meet with the genetic counselor among women in the BC group was associated with fewer perceived costs of having the test. Results suggest a moderate level of interest in gene testing, though intention to be tested may not translate into actual uptake. Women who do choose to have the test may believe the potential 'costs' of using this new genetic technology to be relatively few. This has implications for genetic counselors in terms of providing balanced and complete information to women considering genetic testing for breast cancer susceptibility.     

Predictive genetic testing: mediators and moderators of anxiety

Mediators and moderators of anxiety following predictive genetic testing were investigated in a cross-sectional study of 208 individuals at risk for familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). Receiving a positive test result was associated with increased anxiety. The relationship between test result and anxiety was mediated by how threatened individuals felt by their test results. The impact of a positive test result was greater for those who felt distressed about FAP in their families, perceived FAP to be more serious, and perceived the genetic test to be more accurate. The results suggest that assessing, and possibly modifying, people’s appraisals of the condition and of its impact on the family and of the threat of the genetic test may help to reduce subsequent anxiety. This has implications for the practice of genetic counseling.     

History and rationale of genetic toxicity testing: an impersonal, and sometimes personal, view

Genetic toxicity testing is a necessary and pivotal component of product development and registration. This article traces the historical development and evolution of genetic toxicity testing, and the rationale for such testing, and identifies some of the individuals who played key roles in this process. The evolution of the present test batteries and some of the research and rationales behind the decisions to accept or reject tests are described.     

The ethics of preadoption genetic testing

Developments in genetic technologies have greatly increased our ability to test for a wide variety of genetic disorders in children. These developments raise important ethical questions about the proper use of genetic testing. One context, in particular, where these questions have arisen is that of preadoption genetic testing. This article examines the current consensus view recently advanced by the American College of Medical Genetics and The American Society of Human Genetics on when pediatric testing is ethically permissible. We argue that the consensus view does not adequately recognize the special ethical responsibilities that arise in the preadoption context. Once these special ethical responsibilities are identified, they provide a compelling argument to revise the current standards to permit more preadoption genetic testing than is currently recommended. © 2001 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Predictive genetic testing in minors for Myocilin juvenile onset open angle glaucoma

Myocilin glaucoma is an autosomal dominant disorder leading to irreversible blindness, but early intervention can minimize vision loss and delay disease progression. The purpose of this study was to discuss the benefits of predictive genetic testing in minors for Myocilin mutations associated with childhood onset glaucoma. Three families with Myocilin mutations associated with an age of onset before 18 years and six unaffected at‐risk children were identified. Predictive genetic testing was discussed with the parents and offered for at‐risk minors. Parents opted for genetic testing in half of the cases. None carried the familial mutation. The age of disease onset in the family, the severity of the condition, and the age of the child are all factors that appear to influence the decision of the parent to test their children. Predictive genetic testing for early onset Myocilin glaucoma can facilitate early detection of disease or discharge from routine ophthalmic examinations.     

Legislation on direct-to-consumer genetic testing in seven European countries

An increasing number of private companies are now offering direct-to-consumer (DTC) genetic testing services. Although a lot of attention has been devoted to the regulatory framework of DTC genetic testing services in the USA, only limited information about the regulatory framework in Europe is available. We will report on the situation with regard to the national legislation on DTC genetic testing in seven European countries (Belgium, the Netherlands, Switzerland, Portugal, France, Germany, the United Kingdom). The paper will address whether these countries have legislation that specifically address the issue of DTC genetic testing or have relevant laws that is pertinent to the regulatory control of these services in their countries. The findings show that France, Germany, Portugal and Switzerland have specific legislation that defines that genetic tests can only be carried out by a medical doctor after the provision of sufficient information concerning the nature, meaning and consequences of the genetic test and after the consent of the person concerned. In the Netherlands, some DTC genetic tests could fall under legislation that provides the Minister the right to refuse to provide a license to operate if a test is scientifically unsound, not in accordance with the professional medical practice standards or if the expected benefit is not in balance with the (potential) health risks. Belgium and the United Kingdom allow the provision of DTC genetic tests.     

Psychological impact of genetic testing for hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer

The psychological impact of predictive genetic testing for hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) was assessed in 114 individuals (32 carriers and 82 non-carriers) attending familial cancer clinics, using mailed self-administered questionnaires prior to, 2 weeks, 4 months and 12 months after carrier status disclosure. Compared to baseline, carriers showed a significant increase in mean scores for intrusive and avoidant thoughts about colorectal cancer 2 weeks (t = 2.49; p = 0.014) and a significant decrease in mean depression scores 2 weeks post-notification of result (t = -3.98; p < 0.001) and 4 months post-notification of result (t = -3.22; p = 0.002). For non-carriers, significant decreases in mean scores for intrusive and avoidant thoughts about colorectal cancer were observed at all follow-up assessment time points relative to baseline. Non-carriers also showed significant decreases from baseline in mean depression scores 2 weeks, 4 months and 12 months post-notification. Significant decreases from baseline for mean state anxiety scores were also observed for non-carriers 2 weeks post-notification (t = -3.99; p < 0.001). These data indicate that predictive genetic testing for HNPCC leads to psychological benefits amongst non-carriers, and no adverse psychological outcomes were observed amongst carriers.     

脊髓性肌萎缩症的胚胎着床前遗传学检测专家共识CSCD

脊髓性肌萎缩症(spinal muscular atrophy,SMA)是一种常染色体隐性遗传的运动神经元退行性疾病,主要表现为躯干和四肢近端为主的进行性、对称性肌无力和肌萎缩,人群携带率高,是儿科最常见的致死性神经肌肉病。单基因病胚胎着床前遗传学检测(preimplantation genetic testing,PGT)可以有效预防SMA患儿的出生。为了规范SMA的PGT技术,由中国神经病学、儿科学和生殖遗传学专家组成脊髓性肌萎缩症胚胎着床前遗传学检测专家共识编写组,讨论和制定了本共识,供临床应用参考。     

Public interest in predictive genetic testing, including direct-to-consumer testing, for susceptibility to major depression: preliminary findings

The past decade has seen rapid advances in the identification of associations between candidate genes and a range of common multifactorial disorders. This paper evaluates public attitudes towards the complexity of genetic risk prediction in psychiatry involving susceptibility genes, uncertain penetrance and gene–environment interactions on which successful molecular-based mental health interventions will depend. A qualitative approach was taken to enable the exploration of the views of the public. Four structured focus groups were conducted with a total of 36 participants. The majority of participants indicated interest in having a genetic test for susceptibility to major depression, if it was available. Having a family history of mental illness was cited as a major reason. After discussion of perceived positive and negative implications of predictive genetic testing, nine of 24 participants initially interested in having such a test changed their mind. Fear of genetic discrimination and privacy issues predominantly influenced change of attitude. All participants still interested in having a predictive genetic test for risk for depression reported they would only do so through trusted medical professionals. Participants were unanimously against direct-to-consumer genetic testing marketed through the Internet, although some would consider it if there was suitable protection against discrimination. The study highlights the importance of general practitioner and public education about psychiatric genetics, and the availability of appropriate treatment and support services prior to implementation of future predictive genetic testing services.     

Evaluation of a counselling protocol for predictive genetic testing for hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer

OBJECTIVES—To evaluate the feasibility of a reduced counselling programme for predictive genetic testing for hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) in terms of counsellees' opinions on the extent and significance of genetic counselling and need for psychological support at different phases of the testing procedure.
DESIGN—Prospective follow up study with pre-test questionnaire assessment of background sociodemographic variables. The protocol comprised a pre-test counselling session, a period for reflection, and a test disclosure session. The outcome variables were studied by post-test questionnaires at one month and one year follow up.
SUBJECTS—Two hundred and seventy one high risk members of 36 families with HNPCC who attended both counselling sessions and completed the questionnaires.
RESULTS—The pre-test counselling was considered fairly or very useful by 89% of respondents and one post-test session was considered sufficient by over 80% of respondents at follow up. Fifty three percent would have used extra psychological support had it been offered with the counselling. On enquiry one year after receiving the test result, only 2% stated that the need for support was at its greatest at that time, while the majority (46%) reported that the need for support had been greatest at the moment of test disclosure.
CONCLUSIONS—A protocol that includes one comprehensive pre-test counselling session and a test disclosure session, supplemented with the option of professional psychological support, seems to be sufficient for both the educational and supportive needs of counsellees. Only a minority expressed a need for post-test follow up sessions, which suggests that, in this disorder, resources can be directed to the beneficial surveillance programmes rather than to extensive psychological support.


Keywords: predictive genetic testing; genetic counselling; HNPCC; hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer     

Knowledge of genetics and attitudes toward genetic testing in two hereditary ataxia (SCA 1) Kindreds

Molecular genetic predictive or prenatal genetic testing is now possible in families with one form of adult-onset, autosomal dominant ataxia (SCA 1). Before the SCA 1 gene was isolated, we began a study of the knowledge of genetics, the perception of the disease, and the intended use of genetic testing among members of two large SCA 1 kindreds. Questionnaires were sent to 210 consenting affected, at-risk, and spouse members of two SCA 1 kindreds; data from the 117 respondents were analyzed on a personal computer. Sixty-nine percent of respondents thought predictive testing (by genetic linkage) should be made available immediately, and 42% thought prenatal testing should be made available. The kindreds differed in several important aspects: knowledge of genetic concepts, family size, and anticipated emotional responses to genetic testing. No respondent had obtained individualized genetic counseling. There is moderate interest in genetic testing for this fatal neurodegenerative disease of adulthood. Members of our kindreds have not received genetic counseling outside of the research setting. Finally, factors specific to a particular kindred may influence or predict individual responses to genetic testing. © 1994 Wiley-Liss, Inc.