Transplantation of adult‐sized kidneys in low‐weight pediatric recipients achieves short‐term outcomes comparable to size‐matched grafts

Goldsmith PJ, Asthana S, Fitzpatrick M, Finlay E, Attia MS, Menon KV, Pollard SG, Ridgway DM, Ahmad N. Transplantation of adult‐sized kidneys in low‐weight pediatric recipients achieves short‐term outcomes comparable to size‐matched grafts.
Pediatr Transplantation 2010: 14:919–924. © 2010 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Abstract: Low‐weight pediatric recipients are disadvantaged by scarcity of size‐matched donors. ASK have been successfully used for pediatric recipients. We report the results of renal transplantation using ASK in low‐weight pediatric recipients and compare outcomes in weight‐matched and unmatched donor–recipient pairs. The outcomes of renal transplants using ASK grafts in low‐weight (<20 kg) recipients from a single center over a 10‐yr period were reviewed. Two groups, comprising recipients of grafts from weight‐matched and mismatched donors, were compared. Primary outcome was one‐yr graft survival. Secondary outcomes were one‐ and two‐yr calculated eGFR, changes in recipient body weight, perioperative cardiovascular stability, rates of AR and DGF. Twenty‐three low‐weight recipients were transplanted. Eleven received ASK grafts from high‐weight donors and 12 grafts from low‐weight donors. One patient in each group had early graft loss. No significant difference was observed in rates of DGF, AR, one‐yr graft or patient survival and perioperative cardiovascular parameters. ASK with considerable donor:recipient weight discrepancies can be safely transplanted into small pediatric recipients with comparable outcomes to grafts with less weight discrepancy.     

Outcomes and predictive factors of pediatric kidney transplants: An analysis of the Thai Transplant Registry

As universal coverage for pediatric kidney transplantation (KT) was introduced in Thailand in 2008, the number of recipients has been increasing. We evaluated predictive factors for graft failure to understand how to improve clinical outcomes in these children. Using data obtained from the National Transplant registry, we assessed the risk of graft failure using the Kaplan–Meier method and Cox proportional hazards regression. Altogether, 201 recipients aged <21 yr at the time of KT were studied. Living donors (LD) were significantly older than deceased donor (DD). Mean cold ischemia time of DD was 17 h. The mean donor glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was 84.0 mL/min/1.73 m². Induction immunosuppressive therapy was administered more frequently in DD than in LDKT. Delayed graft function (DGF) occurred in 36 transplants. Over 719 person years of follow‐up, 42 graft failures occurred. Graft survival at one, three, and five yr post‐transplant were 95%, 88% and 76%, respectively. Two factors independently predicted graft failure in multivariate analysis. The hazard ratios for graft failure in patients with DGF and in patients with donor GFR of ≤30 mL/min/1.73 m² were 2.5 and 9.7, respectively. Pediatric recipients should receive the first priority for allografts from young DD with a good GFR, and DGF should be meticulously prevented.     

Split liver transplantation: past, present and future

The technique of liver splitting offers an effective way of increasing the donor pool and decreasing pediatric waiting list mortality. A donor liver is divided in such a way that the left lateral liver graft can be transplanted into a small child and the right extended liver graft into an adult. This innovative technique did not harm the adult recipient pool. Because of its technical complexity and the initial poor results after split liver transplantation (SLT) this procedure has slowly gained acceptance in the Transplantation Community after its first introduction in 1988 (4). Small children with end stage liver disease suffered the most from the extreme shortage of cadaveric donor organs due to the difficulty of finding size-matched donors. The successful surgical development of SLT and a better donor and recipient selection have led to a reduction of the pediatric pretransplant mortality to nearly zero and to results comparable with those after whole organ transplantation (WLT). By splitting a donor organ into two 'full' hemi-grafts and providing a small adult ( < 60 kg) or a big child ( > 30 kg) with the full left graft and a medium-sized adult (60-80 kg) with the full right graft, a small-for-size situation for adolescents or adults can be avoided and the total number of available grafts can be increased. It is the goal to provide each recipient with its customized graft in the near future. However, splitting for two adults requires high technical skills and profound knowledge of the anatomic variations and should be performed in centers with large transplantation experience.     

Factors affecting graft function in pediatric and adult recipients of adult live donor kidney transplants

The aims of this investigation were to compare changes of function of adult living kidney grafts transplanted into adult and child recipients and to analyze factors associated with graft function during the first post-transplant year. The study involved 53 adult and 23 pediatric recipients with immediate graft function and without complications that could influence graft function. In comparison to children, adult recipients and their donors were older, and having been longer on hemodialysis they had received more transfusions. Although similar baseline graft function--GFR(0) was transplanted in both groups, absolute and relative GFR in adults rose and maintained stable, while in children absolute GFR decreased and remained similar to the GFR(0) until the end of the study. Significant predictors of kidney function in both adult and child recipients were donor age, ratio between GFR(0) and recipient BSA, induction immunosuppression, and systolic hypertension. In conclusion, the function of adult live kidney grafts changed differently in children and adults because of different functional requirements of recipients but donor age, induction immunosuppression and hypertension are significant predictor of graft function in both adults and children.     

Using pediatric liver grafts (≤6 yr) for adult recipients: A considerable option?

In LT, the common policy is to allocate pediatric liver grafts to pediatric recipients. Pediatric organs are also offered to adults if there is no pediatric recipient. However, they are rarely accepted for adult recipients. So far, there is no information available reporting outcome of LT in adult recipients using pediatric livers from donors ≤6 yr. In this study, we included nine adult recipients (seven females and two males) who received grafts from children ≤6 yr from January 2008 to December 2013. We evaluated the graft quality, the GBWR and analyzed the recipients’ perioperative course. Laboratory samples and graft perfusion were analyzed. Nine adults with a median age of 49 yr (range: 25–65) and a median weight of 60 kg (range: 48–64) underwent LT with a pediatric donor graft. Median donor age was five yr (range: 3–6). Median GBWR was 1.02 (range: 0.86–1.45). After a median follow‐up of 3.9 yr (range: 11 months–6.6 yr), patient survival was 100%; graft survival was 89%. One patient needed re‐transplantation on the second postoperative day due to PNF. Eight recipients were discharged from the ICU after 2–9 days with a regular graft function. Doppler scans revealed regular flow patterns at any time. Only if denied for pediatric recipients, the use of pediatric livers from donors ≤6 yr for adult recipients is a considerable option.     

Very small pediatric donor kidney transplantation in pediatric recipients

Kidneys from very small pediatric donors (age <5 years, weight <21 kg) may be a means to increase the donor pool for pediatric recipients. Transplantation of small pediatric kidneys is more commonly performed in adult recipients due to the increased risks of technical complications, thrombosis, and early graft failure. While these risks are abrogated in adult recipients by limiting the donor weight to ≥10 kg and using the EB technique, it is unknown whether pediatric recipients achieve comparable results. US national data were assessed for all first‐time, deceased‐donor, kidney‐only pediatric recipients, 1/1996‐10/2013, who received very small pediatric donor grafts or grafts from ideal adult donors. We identified 57 pediatric EB, 110 pediatric SK, and 2350 adult transplants. The primary outcome was 3‐year all‐cause graft survival. Kaplan‐Meier curves showed worse outcomes for pediatric grafts compared to adult ideal grafts (P=.042). On multivariate analysis, pediatric recipients of SK grafts had significantly higher HRs (aHR 2.01, 95% CI 1.34‐3.00) and pediatric recipients of EB grafts had somewhat higher non‐significant HRs (1.57; 95% CI 0.88‐2.79) for graft survival. These results suggest cautionary use of very small pediatric donors as a source to expand the donor pool for pediatric candidates.     

Kidney transplantation from pediatric donors: size-match-based allocation

Abstract:  Use of kidneys from pediatric donors has been associated with worse outcome. We review our 20-yr experience using pediatric kidneys as single grafts in children and adult recipients. Charts review of 29 recipients, transplanted between 1986 and 2005, who received a graft from a donor ≤6 yr was performed. One recipient received "en bloc" graft and the remaining patients received a single kidney. Nine recipients were adults and 21 were children. Creatinine at discharge and at follow-up was recorded and actuarial graft and patient survivals were calculated using life table analysis. All 29 recipients are alive at mean follow-up of 92 months. Five grafts were lost for: primary non-function (1), recurrent FSGS at 14 month (1) and chronic rejection (3). All five recipients who lost their graft received a graft from donors ≤3 yr. Mean calculated GFR (Schwartz formula) at one and five yr were 84.2 mL/m²/1.73 and 98.3 mL/m²/1.73, respectively. Actuarial graft survival was 93.2%, 89.6%, and 81.9% at one, five and at 10 yr after transplant. The use of a single kidney graft from pediatric donors yields good long-term results. Kidneys from small pediatric donors should be allocated first to matched-weight recipients but otherwise can be transplanted in older children or in adults.     

Outcome of renal transplantation in children: a multi-center national report from Iran

The outcome of pediatric renal transplantation was previously reported by a single-center study at the year 2006. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate and report the characteristics and outcome of renal pediatric renal transplantation in a multi-center nationwide study. In this nationwide report, medical records of 907 children (≤18yr) with renal transplantation in eight major pediatric transplant centers of Iran were recorded. These 907 patients received a total of 922 transplants. All children who failed to follow-up were excluded. Rather than baseline characteristics, graft and patient outcomes were considered for survival analysis. For further analysis, they were divided into two groups: patients who had graft survival time more than 10yr (n=91) and the ones with graft survival time of equal or less than 10yr (n=831). Of 922 recipients, 515 (55.8%) were boys and 407 (44.2%) were girls with the mean age of 13.10 (s.d.=3.54) yr. DGF and AR were occurred in 10% and 39.5% of the transplanted children, respectively. Transplantation year, dialyzing status before transplantation, DGF, and AR were significant enough to predict graft survival in cox regression model (overall model: p<0.001). Nowadays, there is a successful live donor pediatric renal transplantation in Iran. Graft survival has improved in our recipients and now the graft survival rates are near to international standards.     

The use of advanced-age donor hearts adversely affects survival in pediatric heart transplantation

There is a limited supply of adequate donor hearts for cardiac transplantation. The safety of using advanced-age donor hearts has been debated in adult transplantation but has not been studied previously in pediatric recipients. In this retrospective study, survival of 79 pediatric heart transplant recipients was reviewed. Pediatric recipient groups were stratified based on donor age (group 1 donor age > 40 yr, n = 5; group 2 donor age < or = 40 yr, n = 74). Survival of 267 adolescent (ages 11-17) heart transplant recipients in the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database was also reviewed. Patients were likewise divided into two groups based on donor age (> 40 yr, n = 12; < or = 40 yr, n = 255). Survival at one yr was 20% in group 1 vs. 78% in group 2 (p < 0.005). Cause of death in all group 1 patients was graft failure secondary to acute rejection. Analysis of risk of death was only significantly attributable to the age of the donor. The increased risk attributable to advanced donor age was also supported by the UNOS data. The UNOS one and two-year Kaplan-Meier survival curves were significantly lower in adolescent patients who received donor hearts > 40 yr of age. One-year survival was 58% (older donors) vs. 85% (younger donors, p < 0.005) and two-year survival was 44% (older donors) vs. 79% (younger donors, p < 0.005). Advanced-age donor hearts should be contraindicated in pediatric transplantation with the exception of critically ill patients who may not be able to wait for a younger heart.     

Long‐term outcomes of living donor kidney transplants in pediatric recipients following laparoscopic vs. open donor nephrectomy

We compared long‐term outcomes of LDKT in pediatric recipients following either laparoscopic (LDN) or ODN. In our retrospective single‐center study, we compared 38 pediatric LDKT recipients of a laparoscopically procured kidney with a historic ODN group comprising 17 pediatric recipients. In our center, the first pure laparoscopic non‐hand‐assisted LDN for a pediatric LDKT recipient was performed in June 2001. Demographic data of donors and recipients were comparable between groups. Mean follow‐up was 64 months in the LDN group and 137 months in the ODN group. Patient survival was comparable between groups. Graft survival at one and five yr was 97% (LDN) vs. 94% (ODN) and 91% (LDN) vs. 88% (ODN; p = n.s.), respectively. Serum creatinine at one and five yr was 1.16 ± 0.47 mg/dL (LDN) vs. 1.02 ± 0.38 mg/dL (ODN) and 1.38 ± 0.5 mg/dL (LDN) vs. 1.20 ± 0.41 mg/dL (ODN), respectively. The type and frequency of surgical complications did not differ between groups. DGF and acute rejection rates were similar between groups. In the ODN group, a higher proportion of right donor kidneys was used. In the ODN group, all kidneys had singular arteries, whereas in the LDN group five kidneys had multiple arteries. Arterial multiplicity was associated with a higher incidence of DGF. In our experience, LDN does not compromise long‐term graft outcomes in pediatric LDKT recipients. Arterial multiplicity of the donor kidney may be a risk factor for impaired early graft function in the pediatric population.     

Outcomes of children receiving en bloc renal transplants from small pediatric donors

The utilization of en bloc renal allografts from small pediatric donors has been adopted as an effective strategy to expand the organ donor pool in adult recipients. Data in children are limited. The aim of our study is to describe the outcomes of en bloc renal transplants in children from our center. Medical records of children receiving pediatric en bloc renal transplants at our institution from January 2007 were abstracted. Data collected included recipient and donor demographics, operative technique and complications, and post‐operative studies. Eight children received en bloc renal transplants at a median age of 17 yr; median follow‐up was 0.9 yr. Donor body weight ranged from 4 to 22 kg. One kidney was lost to intra‐operative thrombosis, while the other kidney from this en bloc graft remained viable. All grafts showed increased renal size at follow‐up ultrasound. Surveillance biopsies showed glomerulomegaly in two patients. At last follow‐up, the median eGFR was 130 mL/min/1.73 m². The urinary protein to creatinine ratio was normal in four of seven patients. Our data suggest that in experienced centers, en bloc renal transplantation from young donors into pediatric recipients is effective. Long‐term follow‐up to monitor for complications, including hyperfiltration injury, is warranted.     

En bloc kidney transplantation from infant donors younger than 10 months into pediatric recipients

Early graft loss and poor graft function limit the use of kidneys from infant donors. Six en bloc kidney transplantations were performed from infant donors younger than 10 months into pediatric recipients between November 2012 and September 2015 at our center. We retrospectively analyzed recipient and donor demographics, surgery procedures, complications, graft function and size, and patient and graft survival with a follow‐up of 6‐39 months (median 15.5 months). Donor age ranged from 1 to 10 months with weight ranging from 3.5 to 10 kg. Recipient age ranged from 10 to 16 years with weight ranging from 30 to 39 kg. One kidney was removed due to arterial thrombosis during surgery, while the other kidney of this en bloc graft remained viable. Urine leak followed by bilateral ureteral obstruction occurred in one recipient. All of the recipients showed immediate graft function. The size of the en bloc kidney increased from 4.2±0.6 cm to 7.6±0.6 cm 6 months after surgery. Patient and graft survival were both 100% at the last follow‐up. Our results show that en bloc kidney transplantation from infant donors younger than 10 months into pediatric recipients is effective under the condition of experienced surgical techniques and perioperative management.     

Impact of donor preprocurement cardiac arrest on clinical outcomes in pediatric deceased donor liver transplantation

PPCA has historically been considered detrimental to donor quality in LT, but transplantation of grafts from this group of donors is now routine. Our study aims to evaluate the outcomes associated with use of donors with a history of PPCA in the pediatric population. This study is a single‐center retrospective analysis of all pediatric LTs performed over an 18‐year period. Donors and recipients were stratified by the presence and length of donor PPCA time. Preprocurement donor and post‐transplant recipient laboratory values were collected to assess the degree of ischemic liver injury associated with each donor group. Cox regression analysis was used to compare survival. The records for 130 deceased pediatric LT donors and corresponding recipients were reviewed. There were 73 (56%) non‐PPCA donors and 57 (44%) PPCA donors. Donors that experienced a PPCA event demonstrated a higher median, pretransplant peak alanine aminotransferase (ALT) level (P < .001). When comparing post‐transplant recipient median ALT levels, donors with any PPCA had lower median peak ALT (P = .15) and day 3 ALT (P = .43) levels than the non‐PPCA group. Rates of early graft loss did not differ. The PPCA group with >40 minutes of ischemia had markedly lower survival at 10 years, but this finding did not reach statistical significance. Liver grafts from donors with or without PPCA demonstrated no statistically significant differences in function or survival. A history of donor PPCA alone should not be used as an exclusionary criterion in pediatric liver transplantation.     

Optimizing the utilization of kidneys from small pediatric deceased donors under 15 kg by choosing pediatric recipients

Currently, most kidneys from small pediatric deceased donors are transplanted into adult recipients (i.e., PTA). However, due to the weight mismatch, there is a high discard rate and a high ratio of EBKTs if adopting PTA. Here, we sought both to optimize utilization of these challenging but scarce donor grafts by selecting pediatric recipients and to characterize the feasibility and efficacy of this PTP allocation strategy. From February 2012 to October 2014, kidneys from 27 infant donors ≤15 kg were procured and distributed to 38 pediatric candidates in our center. The grafts were utilized for EBKT if the donor weighed 2.5–5 kg and for SKT if the donor weighed 5–15 kg, leading to 10 EBKTs and 28 SKTs. The overall utilization rate from small pediatric deceased donors was 94.12%. After a follow‐up of 3–26 months, the graft survival rate was 89.47%, with four graft losses due to vascular thrombosis. Kidneys from low‐body‐weight donors should be applied to pediatric recipients, and the kidneys from infant donors ≥5 kg can be used in single‐kidney‐transplant procedures at experienced centers to optimize utilization.     

Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: the pediatric recipient in a dual-site program

BACKGROUND: At our institution, laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy (LLDN) is done at a different hospital site than pediatric recipient transplantation, whereas open donor nephrectomy (OLDN) is done in the adjacent operating room. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety of a dual-site renal transplantation program by comparing the outcomes of pediatric recipients of LLDN vs. OLDN. METHODS: This is a retrospective study of consecutive pediatric recipients (n = 10) of LLDN (June 2002 to June 2005) compared to the 10 most recent pediatric recipients of OLDN (March 2001 to June 2005). Renal function was assessed with calculated creatinine clearance using the Schwartz formula and the following outcomes were assessed: delayed graft function, ureteral complications, acute rejection and patient and graft survival. Results are expressed as median (IQR). RESULTS: When comparing the laparoscopic vs. open group, there were no significant differences in recipient age, height, weight, preoperative calculated creatinine clearance and warm ischemia time. Twelve month postoperative creatinine clearance was 88 ml/min/1.73 m(2) (57-99) in the laparoscopic group (n = 8) and 66 ml/min/1.73 m(2) (60-86) in the open group (n = 9), p = 0.2. In the LLDN group vs. the OLDN group, delayed graft function was 0% vs. 10% (p = 1.0), ureteral complications were 20% vs. 30% (p = 1.0), and acute rejection was 20% vs. 40% (p = 0.6). In the laparoscopic group, one-yr patient and graft survival were both 100%, as compared to 100% and 89%, respectively, in the open group. CONCLUSION: A dual-site laparoscopic donor nephrectomy program is not associated with adverse pediatric recipient outcomes when compared to a same-site open donor approach.     

Urological complications,vesicoureteral reflux,and long‐term graft survival rate after pediatric kidney transplantation

To describe a single‐center experience with kidney transplantation and then study some donor and recipient features that may impact on graft survival and urological complication rates. We reviewed our database searching for pediatric patients who underwent kidney transplantation from August 1985 through November 2012. Preoperative data and postoperative complications were recorded. Graft survival rates were analyzed and compared based on the type of donor, donor's age from deceased donors, and recipients' ESRD cause. Kaplan–Meier curves with log rank and Wilcoxon tests were used to perform the comparisons. There were 305 pediatric kidney transplants. The mean recipient's age was 11.7 yr. The mean follow‐up was 11.0 yr. Arterial and venous thrombosis rates were 1.6% and 2.3%, respectively, while urinary fistula and symptomatic vesicoureteral reflux were diagnosed in 2.9% and 3.6% of cases, respectively. Deceased kidney transplantation had a lower graft survival rate than living kidney transplantation (log rank, p = 0.005). Donor's age (p = 0.420) and ESRD cause (p = 0.679) were not significantly related to graft survival rate. In long‐term follow‐up, type of donor, but not donor's age, impacts on graft survival rate. ESRD cause has no impact on graft survival rate, showing that well‐evaluated recipients may have good outcomes.     

Long-term outcome of deceased donor renal transplantation in pediatric recipients: A single-center experience from a developing country

Kute VB, Trivedi HL, Vanikar AV, Shah PR, Gumber MR, Patel HV, Munjappa BC, Modi PR, Gera DN. Long‐term outcome of deceased donor renal transplantation in pediatric recipients: A single‐center experience from a developing country Abstract: RTx is best treatment for children with ESRD. Data scarcity on DDRTx outcome in children prompted us to review our experience. This study was undertaken to evaluate patient/graft survival, function vis‐a‐vis SCr, rejection episodes, and mortality in DDRTx performed in 37 children between 1998 and 2011. The most common recipient diseases leading to ESRD were congenital anomalies of kidney and urinary tract (48.6%) and chronic glomerulonephritis (18.9%). Mean recipient age was 13.8 ± 3.1 yr; 67.5% (n = 25) were men. Mean donor age was 38.8 ± 18.6 yr; 48.5% (n = 18) were men. Mean dialysis duration pre‐transplantation was 15.5 ± 3.5 months. All recipients received r‐ATG, and triple immunosuppression. Over a mean follow‐up of 3.93 ± 3.5 yr, patient and graft survival rates were 72.9% (n = 27) and 83.7% (n = 31), respectively, with a mean SCr of 1.1 mg/dL; 21.6% (n = 8) of patients had acute rejection episodes; 24.3% (n = 9) of patients had DGF. A total of 27% (n = 10) patients died, mainly owing to infections (n = 6) and cardiovascular disease (n = 3). DDRTx is a viable option for children and achieves acceptable graft function with patient/graft survival over long‐term follow‐up, encouraging use of this approach.     

Pediatric renal transplantation—A UNOS database analysis of donor–recipient size mismatch

Background

We used the BSAi (Donor BSA/Recipient BSA) to assess whether transplanting a small or large kidney into a pediatric recipient relative to his/her size influences renal transplant outcomes.

Methods

We included 14 322 single-kidney transplants in pediatric recipients (0–17 years old) (01/2000–02/2020) from the United Network for Organ Sharing database. We divided cases into four BSAi groups (BSAi ≤ 1, 1 < BSAi ≤ 2, 2 < BSAi ≤ 3, BSAi > 3).

Results

There were no differences concerning delayed graft function (DGF) or primary non-function (PNF) rates, whether the grafts were from living or brain-dead donors. In both transplants coming from living donors and brain-dead donors, cases with BSAi > 3 and cases with 2 < BSAi ≤ 3 had similar graft survival (p = .13 for transplants from living donors, p = .413 for transplants from brain-dead donors), and both groups had longer graft survival than cases with 1 < BSAi ≤ 2 and cases with BSAi ≤ 1 (p < .001). The difference in 10-year graft survival rates between cases with BSAi > 3 and cases with BSAi ≤ 1 reached around 25% in both donor types. The better graft survival in transplants with BSAi > 2 was confirmed in multivariable analysis.

Conclusions

There is no significant impact of donor-recipient size mismatch on DGF and PNF rates in pediatric renal transplants. However, graft survival is significantly improved when the donor's size is more than twice the pediatric recipient's size.     

Prevention of vascular thromboses after renal transplantation using low molecular weight heparin]

Vascular thrombosis is one of the main causes of early transplant failure in pediatric patients. This paper reports the results of an open trial of the low molecular weight heparin (Enoxaparine) used to prevent renal graft thrombosis in pediatric recipients with risk factors including donor or recipient age under 5 years, multiple arteries supplying the transplant, and positive history for recurrent thrombosis. During 1989, 42 of 67 children given a renal transplant were prophylactically treated with Enoxaparin. Only one transplant was lost to thrombosis among treated patients (1.5%), versus 9 transplants among 73 (12%) children who received their kidney in 1988 without prophylactic Enoxaparin. Risk factors were comparable in both groups of recipients. Enoxaparine therapy was associated with an increased rate of bleeding (12/42) without severe consequences. In conclusion, Enoxaparin is effective in preventing renal graft thrombosis. Availability of this prophylactic therapy makes it possible to use transplants removed from the youngest donors considered as inadequate by some groups.     

Satisfactory usage of kidneys from pediatric donors with severe hand foot mouth disease

No studies have reported making use of kidneys from pediatric donors with severe HFMD. Here, we retrospectively analyzed the feasibility and clinical effect of six cases of kidney transplantation from four pediatric donors with severe HFMD in our center between January 2014 and December 2016. The donors’ age ranged from 6 months to 3 years and 11 months. The recipients’ age ranged from 18 to 41 years. Single kidney transplantation was performed in four recipients, and dual splitting kidney transplantation and en bloc kidney transplantation were performed in two recipients, respectively. During the 1.5‐4 years follow‐up, all recipients maintained normal kidney allograft function except for one recipient whose allograft was removed due to the allograft artery thrombosis. The survival rates of recipient and allograft were 100% and 83.3%, respectively. None of the six recipients showed any symptoms associated with HFMD. In conclusion, it is feasible to perform kidney transplantation from pediatric donors with severe HFMD to adult recipients with immunity to the pathogens. The clinical effect is satisfactory.