Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy with selective control of the renal parenchyma: initial experience with a novel laparoscopic clamp

OBJECTIVE

To report a laparoscopic device that facilitates regional ischaemia in laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Mimicking the shape of a clamp successfully applied in open PN, we developed a laparoscopic device that allows selective clamping in LPN. After obtaining transperitoneal access to the renal mass, the laparoscopic clamp was placed around the tumour 1–2 cm proximal to the line of resection. After excising the tumour, haemostasis was mainly achieved by applying a haemostyptic agent.

RESULTS

Three patients with elective indications had LPN using this novel laparoscopic clamp. The tumours were in the upper and lower pole of the kidney in one and two patients, respectively. The tumour diameter was 2.4, 2.6 and 3.2 cm, and the selective clamping time 23, 27 and 38 min. Blood loss was minimal in all three cases, with no complications after LPN. The final pathology showed a papillary and clear cell renal carcinoma in two and one patients, respectively. There were no positive margins on histological assessment.

CONCLUSION

LPN with clamping of the renal parenchyma using this novel device can be used in selected patients with peripheral tumours. Resection of the tumour in a bloodless field is possible. The main advantage is that ischaemia occurs only in the renal parenchyma next to the tumour, facilitating nephron‐sparing surgery without being pressed for time.     

Laparoscopic ice slush renal hypothermia for partial nephrectomy: the initial experience

PURPOSE: We describe a novel technique of laparoscopic renal hypothermia with intracorporeal ice slush during partial nephrectomy as well as clinical experience with the initial 12 patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 12 select patients with an infiltrating renal tumor who were candidates for nephron sparing surgery underwent transperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy with renal hypothermia. An Endocatch II (United States Surgical Corp., Norwalk, Connecticut) bag was placed around the mobilized kidney and its drawstring was cinched around the intact renal hilum. The renal artery and vein were occluded en bloc with a Satinsky clamp. The bottom of the engaged bag was retrieved through a 12 mm port site and opened, and ice slush was introduced within the bag to completely surround the kidney. After renal hypothermia was achieved laparoscopic partial nephrectomy was performed by duplicating open surgical techniques. Renal parenchymal temperature was measured using a thermocouple needle in 5 patients. Median tumor size was 3.2 cm (range 1.5 to 5.5), 6 tumors (50%) were central in location and an imperative indication for partial nephrectomy was present in 7 patients (58%). RESULTS: All procedures were successfully completed laparoscopically without open conversion. Median time to deploy the bag around the kidney was 7 minutes (range 5 to 20), the median volume of ice slush introduced was 600 cc (range 300 to 750) and the time needed to insert the ice slush was 4 minutes (range 3 to 10). Median blood loss was 200 cc, total ischemia time was 43.5 minutes (range 25 to 55) and total operative time was 4.3 hours (range 3 to 5.5). Nadir renal parenchymal temperature was 5C to 19C and the mean decrease in systemic temperature was 0.6C. Histopathology confirmed renal cell carcinoma in 11 patients (92%), of whom all had negative surgical margins. Intraoperative complications occurred in 2 initial patients, including partial bag slippage in 1 and Satinsky clamp malfunction in 1. Postoperatively renal scan confirmed a functioning ipsilateral kidney in all cases. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge we present the initial clinical report of laparoscopic renal hypothermia for partial nephrectomy. By replicating standard open surgical practice our intracorporeal ice slush technique has the potential to extend the scope of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy to more complicated renal tumors.     

Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal tumor: single center experience comparing clamping and no clamping techniques of the renal vasculature

PURPOSE: We performed a nonrandomized retrospective comparison of 2 techniques for laparoscopic partial nephrectomy, that is without and with clamping the renal vessels. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between December 1997 and February 2002, 28 consecutive patients underwent transperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal tumor. In group 1 (12 patients) partial nephrectomy was performed with ultrasonic shears and bipolar cautery without clamping the renal vessels, while in group 2 (16 patients) the renal pedicle was clamped before tumor excision. In group 2 patients intracorporeal kidney cooling was achieved by a ureteral catheter connected to 4C solution. Intracorporeal freehand suturing techniques were used to close the collecting system when opened and approximate the renal parenchyma. RESULTS: All procedures were successfully completed laparoscopically. Mean renal ischemia time +/- SD was 27.3 +/- 7 minutes (range 15 to 47) in group 2 patients. Mean laparoscopic operating time was 179.1 +/- 86 minutes (range 90 to 390) in group 1 compared with 121.5 +/- 37 minutes (range 60 to 210) in group 2 (p = 0.004). Mean intraoperative blood loss was significantly higher in group 1 than in group 2 (708.3 +/- 569 versus 270.3 +/- 281 ml., p = 0.014). Three patients in group 1 and 2 in group 2 required blood transfusions. Immediately postoperatively mean creatinine was 1.26 +/- 0.36 and 1.45 +/- 0.61 mg./dl. in groups 1 and 2, respectively (p = 0.075). Surgical margins were negative in all specimens. Pathological examination revealed renal cell cancer in 18 cases (stages pT1 in 17 and pT3a in 1), oncocytoma in 4, angiomyolipoma in 5 and renal adenoma in 1. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy represents a feasible option for patients with small renal masses. Clamping the renal vessels during tumor resection and suturing the kidney mimics the open technique and seems to be associated with less blood loss and shorter laparoscopic operative time.     

Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy with segmental renal artery clamping: technique and clinical outcomes

Background

Warm ischemic injury is one of the most important factors affecting renal function in partial nephrectomy (PN). The technique of segmental renal artery clamping emerges as an alternative to conventional renal artery clamping for renal hilar control.

Objective

To evaluate the feasibility and efficiency of laparoscopic PN (LPN) with segmental renal artery clamping in comparison with the conventional technique.

Design, setting, and participants

A total of 75 patients underwent LPN from June 2007 to November 2009. All patients had T1a or T1b tumor in one kidney and a normal contralateral kidney. Thirty-seven patients underwent surgeries with main renal artery clamping, and 38 underwent surgeries with segmental artery clamping.

Intervention

All procedures were performed by the same laparoscopic surgeon.

Measurements

Blood loss, operation time, warm ischemia (WI) time, and complications affected renal function before and after operation were recorded.

Results and limitations

All LPNs were completed without conversion to open surgery or nephrectomy. The novel technique slightly increased WI time (p < 0.001) and intraoperative blood loss (p = 0.006), while it provided better postoperative affected renal function (p < 0.001) compared with the conventional technique. The total complication rate was 12%. Among the 38 cases where segmental renal artery clamping was performed, 7 had to convert to the conventional method. Tumor size and location influenced the number of clamped segmental arteries. Long-term postoperative renal function is still awaited.

Conclusions

LPN with segmental artery clamping is safe and feasible in clinical practice. It minimizes the intraoperative WI injury and improves early postoperative affected renal function compared with main renal artery clamping.     

Initial experience in laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal tumor with clamping of renal vessels

PURPOSE: To describe our initial experience with laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) with clamping of the renal vessels before tumor excision and suturing of the renal parenchyma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between July 2001 and April 2002, 19 consecutive patients underwent transperitoneal LPN in our institution, 14 for tumors <4 cm with suspicion of renal-cell cancer and 5 for suspicion of angiomyolipoma at CT with one tumor confirmed histopathologically by percutaneous needle biopsy. We divided these patients into the first 10 cases (Group 1) and the last 9 cases (Group 2). One patient had end-stage renal disease but was not on dialysis; the remaining patients had elective partial nephrectomy. Initially, a ureteral catheter was placed. The partial nephrectomy was performed with clamping of the renal vessels, so that the tumor was excised with cold scissors. Intracorporeal cooling of the kidney was achieved by a ureteral catheter connected to a 4 degrees C solution flowing to the renal pelvis during the whole procedure until the clamps were released. Intracorporeal free-hand suturing was exclusively used to close the collecting system (when opened) and to approximate the renal parenchyma. RESULTS: All procedures were completed laparoscopically. The mean renal warm ischemia time was 28.5+/-7 minutes (range 15-47 minutes). The mean laparoscopic operating time was 125+/-37 minutes (range 90-390 minutes). The mean intraoperative blood loss was 290+/-276 mL (range 25-1200 mL). Two patients required blood transfusion, and four had complications. There was immediate deterioration in renal function (creatinine 1.42+/-0.56 mg/dL), but improvement was seen at 1 month (1.17+/-0.34 mg/dL). There were no statistically significant differences in operative features and outcomes in Groups 1 and 2, but there were improvements in the mean operating time by 30 minutes, the mean intraoperative blood loss by 113 mL without any transfusion, and the mean renal warm ischemia time by 6 minutes. There was only one patient in Group 2 with a complication. The surgical margin was negative for tumor for all patients. Postoperative pathology examination showed renal-cell cancer in 11 patients (pT1), oncocytoma in 3 patients, and angiomyolipoma in 5 patients. The mean tumor grade was 2. The mean tumor size was 25.8+/-11.6 mm with a mean tumor-free margin of 2.6+/-2.4 mm. The median follow-up is 3 months, so oncologic outcome cannot be assessed. CONCLUSION: The technique of LPN can be standardized and should be proposed for small tumors when they are not invading the hilum. Clamping the renal pedicle allows better vision for more accurate tumor excision with a safety margin and hemostatic suturing of the parenchymal defect, resulting in less blood loss and shorter operative time, parameters that improve with experience.     

Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: the European experience.

Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy is technically difficult but oncologically effective. The operation should be performed in centers with expertise. Hemostasis can be achieved using bipolar coagulation and fibrin glue-coated cellulose. Further studies will determine whether less invasive alternatives (focused ultrasound, cryotherapy) will meet the high standard of open (or laparoscopic) nephron-sparing surgery for small renal cell carcinoma.CommentaryThe technique of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for the treatment of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is in its very early stages. The cumulative experience reported in the literature comprises fewer than 100 cases and these have been confounded by a lack of standardized technique and variable experience. There has been difficulty in reproducing the essential elements of open partial nephrectomy using contemporary laparoscopic instrumentation. In this large multicenter European study, hemostasis was achieved with bipolar coagulation and fibrin-coated cellulose. Notwithstanding that case selection was limited to very small (≤3 cm) peripheral renal tumors, the morbidity of partial nephrectomy in this study was greater than that of open partial nephrectomy for small peripheral tumors.At the Cleveland Clinic, we have recently developed a technique for laparoscopic partial nephrectomy which duplicates established open surgical principles. The key technical steps in this approach include:Since August 1999, this technique has been used to perform laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in 36 patients with small, exophytic renal tumors. Mean tumor size was 2.9 cm (range 1.4–7.0 cm). The operation was successful in all cases without any open conversions. Mean operative time was 2.9 h, warm ischemia time was 20 min and blood loss was 237 ml. Formal calyceal suture repair was performed in 7 patients. Mean hospital stay was 1.7 days. The final pathology revealed renal cell carcinoma in 20 patients and other tumors in the remainder. All margins of resection were negative for tumor.Our initial experience suggests that laparoscopic partial nephrectomy can be performed for small exophytic renal tumors with adherence to established principles and techniques of the open surgical approach and with significant benefits for the patient.Andrew C. Novick, M.D.     

Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: The McMaster University experience

Introduction:

Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) remains one of the more challenging procedures in urology. Minimizing warm ischemia time (WIT) and bleeding requires efficient intracorporeal suturing. In addition, achieving negative surgical margins requires complete excision of the tumour. We report a large Canadian series of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy with intermediate follow-up.

Methods:

Between September 2000 and August 2008, 152 consecutive laparoscopic partial nephrectomies were performed at our centre. Demographic, pathological and clinical data were collected through a retrospective review of the charts.

Results:

The average tumour size was 2.68 cm (Range: 0.5–8.8. The vast majority of tumours were malignant (80%). All margins were negative, except for 2 patients who underwent an immediate re-resection. There were no local recurrences or distant metastasis during the follow-up period of 44.3 months. Most procedures required hilar clamping (93.4%) with a mean WIT of 34 minutes, with a clear trend for declining WIT with increasing experience. Five procedures were converted to laparoscopic radical nephrectomy, 10 converted to a hand-assisted procedure, and 1 was converted to an open partial nephrectomy. The average blood loss was 162 cc. Complications related to the procedure were classified according to the Clavien grading system. The average drop in the glomerular filtration rate was calculated by the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) Study equation between preoperative and 2.5 months postoperative was 8.6 mL/min/1.73 m².

Conclusions:

LPN is a challenging procedure that requires advanced laparoscopic skills. LPN is feasible with excellent oncological outcomes, and an acceptable complication profile. The short-term impact on overall renal function is minimal. The most common postoperative complication was pseudo-aneurysm requiring embolization, which reinforces the intra-operative need for meticulous and a quick suture-ligation of blood vessels during LPN.     

Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: experience in 60 cases

PURPOSE: To identify the factors associated with better outcomes in patients undergoing laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of 36 men and 24 women aged 31 to 80 years (mean 60 years) in whom LPN was attempted at our institution over a 3.5-year period. Baseline patient characteristics and operative, pathologic, and postoperative outcomes were analyzed. The median duration of follow-up was 14.2 months (range 1-38 months). RESULTS: The median pathologic tumor size was 2.1 cm (range 0.7-6.0 cm). Final pathologic review revealed renal-cell carcinoma in 73% of patients. Six patients (10%) required conversion to either an open partial nephrectomy or a laparoscopic radical nephrectomy. Dense perinephric adipose tissue in the setting of a small renal tumor and unanticipated multifocal disease were factors associated with surgical conversion. The median overall estimated blood loss was 112 mL, and the median warm-ischemia time was 30 minutes. Blood loss was greater in patients who did not undergo hilar clamping (467 v 65 mL; P = 0.008). CONCLUSION: Factors influencing successful LPN outcomes include selecting a tumor commensurate with the surgeon's laparoscopic experience, performing routine hilar clamping, adjunctive use of hemostatic agents, and renal-parenchymal suture ligation. The presence of thick, fibrotic perinephric fat overlying a small tumor increases the technical difficulty.     

Robot assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: initial experience

PURPOSE: Advances in laparoscopy have made laparoscopic partial nephrectomy a technically feasible procedure but it remains challenging to even experienced laparoscopists. We hypothesized that robotic assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy may make this procedure more efficacious than the standard laparoscopic approach. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten patients with a mean age of 58 years and mean tumor size of 2.0 cm underwent robotic assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy and another 10 with a mean age of 61 years and mean tumor size of 2.18 cm underwent laparoscopic partial nephrectomy, as performed by a team of 2 surgeons (MS and ST) between May 2002 and January 2004. Demographic data, intraoperative parameters and postoperative data were compared between the 2 groups. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in patient demographics between the 2 groups. Intraoperative data and postoperative outcomes were statistically similar. In the 10 patients who underwent robotic assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy there were 2 intraoperative complications. There was 1 conversion in the laparoscopic partial nephrectomy group. CONCLUSIONS: Robotic assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy is a safe and feasible procedure in patients with small exophytic masses. The robotic approach to laparoscopic partial nephrectomy does not offer any clinical advantage over conventional laparoscopic nephrectomy.     

Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy with "on-demand" clamping reduces warm ischemia time

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the impact of "on-demand" clamping during laparoscopic partial nephrectomy on warm ischemia time. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 39 consecutive patients with renal tumors who had undergone transperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy from April 2002 to May 2006. Median tumor size was 2.3 cm. In all cases, the hilum was dissected early and extracorporeal clamping performed. The pedicle was clamped only in case of excessive bleeding, and it was released immediately after the closure of the renal defect with knot-tying sutures over Surgicel bolsters. RESULTS: Median operative time was 120 min. Renal clamping was required in 31 of 39 patients and in this subgroup the median warm ischemia time was 9 min. Median operative blood loss was 150 ml. Eight patients required blood transfusion and among these two were converted to open surgery. Positive surgical margin was observed in one case. Renal cell carcinoma was present in 22 (54.4%) specimens. No recurrence was observed after a median follow-up of 15 mo. CONCLUSIONS: This novel technique using extracorporeal clamping significantly decreases warm ischemia time, avoiding clamping of the pedicle in selected cases. Our study underlines the feasibility of performing laparoscopic partial nephrectomy with extracorporeal hilar clamping, allowing the shortest ischemia time ever published.     

Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. The European experience

Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy is technically difficult but oncologically effective. The operation should be performed in centers with expertise. Hemostasis can be achieved using bipolar coagulation and fibrin glue-coated cellulose. Further studies will determine whether less invasive alternatives (focused ultrasound, cryotherapy) will meet the high standard of open (or laparoscopic) nephron-sparing surgery for small renal cell carcinoma.     

Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy of solid renal masses without hilar clamping using a monopolar radio frequency device

PURPOSE: Partial nephrectomy is currently recommended for most amenable solid renal tumors, especially if they are exophytic and less than 4 cm. We reviewed our initial experience with laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for solid renal masses without clamping the renal vasculature using a monopolar device that uses radio frequency energy with low volume saline irrigation for simultaneous blunt dissection, hemostatic sealing and coagulation of the renal parenchyma (TissueLink, TissueLink Medical, Inc., Dover, New Hampshire). MATERIALS AND METHODS: From September 2002 to April 2003, 10 patients underwent transperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy, including 9 with solid renal masses and 1 with a complex cyst. In all cases the renal hilum was dissected and the renal vessels were isolated but none had renal vascular clamping. The TissueLink DS dissecting sealer or Floating Ball (TissueLink Medical, Inc.) was used to dissect the tumor free bluntly, while simultaneously sealing and coagulating bleeders. RESULTS: Mean patient age was 54.6 years (range 42 to 72). Mean American Society of Anesthesiologists score was 2.3 (range 2 to 4). Mean tumor size was 3.9 cm (range 2.1 to 8). The mass had a peripheral location in 7 cases and a central location in 3. Mean operative time was 232 minutes (range 144 to 280) and mean blood loss was 352 ml (range 20 to 1000). One patient received blood transfusion and all tumor margins were negative. Mean hospital stay was 1.7 days (range 1 to 5) and pain medication use was minimal. One patient had a brief period of urine leakage from the lower pole calix, which was managed successfully by ureteral stenting and Foley catheter drainage of the bladder. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy can be performed without renal vascular clamping. TissueLink technology allows complete tumor resection and provides adequate parenchymal hemostasis of the tumor bed. Its scant tissue charring production does not interfere with the pathological assessment of the tumor margin status.     

A model for assuring clamping success during laparoscopic partial nephrectomy with segmental renal artery clamping

Objectives

A model for assuring clamping success was established for laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) with segmental renal artery clamping (SRAC).

Materials and methods

Patients (n = 107; December 2009–September 2011) who underwent LPN with SRAC dependent on the experience of the surgeon and CTA were retrospectively reviewed to determine the optimal characteristics of target arteries. After multiple logistic regression analysis, variables used to build a nomogram were selected using a backward elimination scheme. A model for a clamping program customized to the patient was designed. The surgical outcomes of patients (n = 141; October 2011–June 2014) who subsequently underwent LPN-SRAC with the applied model were compared with those of the first group of patients.

Results

Five potential predictors were initially assessed: segmental renal artery angle, target artery diameter, and distance (d) to the abdominal aorta, renal hilum (d _RH), and kidney midline (d _KML). The regression equation was set up as:

$${\text{Clamping assurance}} = \frac{{{\text{e}}^{x} }}{{1 + {\text{e}}^{x} }},\quad {\text{where}}\,x = 12.360 + 4.863\left( {d_{\text{RH}} } \right) - 8.848\left( {d_{\text{KML}} } \right).$$

Comparing the patient groups, those for whom the new SRAC model was applied had a significantly better success rate of clamping (P < 0.001), less total operative time (P < 0.001), and less operative blood loss (P = 0.042). No obvious differences were observed in time of warm ischemia, postoperative hospitalization, RENAL nephrometry score, or number of final clamped branches.

Conclusions

The model for assuring clamping success was helpful in designing an SRAC program and thus benefiting the LPN procedure.

     

Off-clamp robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: initial washington university experience

Abstract Background and Purpose: Because of the impact warm ischemia time may have on renal function, various surgical techniques have been proposed to minimize or eliminate warm ischemia. The purpose of this study is to evaluate our initial renal functional outcomes of off-clamp robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN), while assessing the safety profile of this unconventional surgical approach. Patients and Methods: We performed a retrospective review of our off-clamp RAPN experience between August 2007 and January 2012. All patients with baseline and postoperative serum creatinine determinations were included. Patient demographics, operative information, perioperative outcomes, and renal functional outcomes were evaluated for this cohort. Results: Forty-two patients with a mean age of 59.9 years (standard deviation [SD]=12) had a median follow-up of 100 days (range 1-1007 days). In all cases, warm ischemia time was 0 minutes. Mean operative time was 143 minutes (SD=59), and median estimated blood loss was 138?mL (range 50-1500?mL). No intraoperative complications were encountered, and all surgical margins were negative. Our postoperative complication rate was 14.3%. At the most recent follow-up, the mean estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was 76.2?mL/min/1.73?m(2) (SD=27.6), compared with 78.5?mL/min/1.73?m(2) (SD=28.9) preoperatively (P=0.11). Therefore, the mean eGFR decline of 2.3?mL/min/1.73?m(2) (SD=9.1) was not significant. Conclusions: Off-clamp RAPN is associated with minimal morbidity and minimal decline in renal function on short-term follow-up. Further studies and continued monitoring of renal function are needed to determine if off-clamp RAPN provides any advantage in renal function preservation relative to the traditional RAPN with vascular clamping.