Strengthening public health practice content in public health training.

U.S. schools of public health have recognized the imperative to strengthen the public health practice content of training for future public health practitioners. Five strategies to develop administrative and curriculum programs within schools of public health to address this need are described: (1) institution of centers for public health program evaluation; (2) creation of automated field placement and apprenticeship programs; (3) formalization of linkages with professional management training programs to create a track for future senior managers of community health agencies; (4) establishment of cross-departmental applied public health faculty tracks; and (5) offering applied public health evaluation scholarships for students. These initiatives may provide incentives for the institution of a public health practice focus within schools of public health.     

Private sector health care organizations and essential public health services: potential effects on the practice of local public health.

This article focuses on the activities of eight private health care organizations undertaking public health and prevention activities. Few activities were motivated by or integrated into the business or operating strategy of the organizations and poor integration with the business strategy puts the long-term future of these activities in jeopardy. The lack of integrated activity can be attributed to: slow pace of managed care implementation; low penetrance of full-risk capitated reimbursement; and fragmented, competitive health care markets. Purchaser pressure, quality assurance requirements, community benefit standards, and government mandates are among the levers available to encourage such activities by the private sector.     

Measles in the tropics and public health practice

Measles shows three distinct transmission patterns in the tropics, one each in urban, rural and insular or very remote areas. The characteristics of measles transmission are reviewed for each area, both with and without immunization.Planning must be based on the best use of currently underused infrastructure in the light of epidemiology. Mass mobile campaigns are not advised for urban areas. Vaccination of the sick and the well as part of episodic medical care is proposed, and vaccination of the sick is supported as safe and effective. Age floors and ceilings should be set with reference to the local situation; adoption of international “rules of thumb”, without reference to local conditions, is inadvisable.A mixed strategy is urged for rural areas, with routine immunization against measles as part of a multi-antigen programme. Routine immunization should be complemented by annual surveillance and containment during the seasonal trough.Research and development needs in measles control include better understanding of measles epidemiology, more operationally useful quantitative models, and trials of new control strategies.Control, elimination and eradication are defined and discussed.     

Can public health performance standards improve the quality of public health practice?

Recent developments suggest that a national public health performance standards program could succeed in improving the quality of public health practice. Public health standards also may be useful for enhancing accountability and strengthening the science base of public health practice. For national public health performance standards to have a substantial influence on the quality of public health practice, several important issues must be addressed. These include agreement as to the ultimate purpose and appropriate unit of measurement, delineation of the specific qualities to be measured, and expansion of strategies to promote widespread use of public health practice standards.     

Public health in practice: the three domains of public health

This paper outlines a conceptual model for public health practice by proposing the three domains as a framework to organize and to deliver public health programmes. The model builds on the recognition that public health is everybody's business and therefore, needs a common definitional base. Different levels of skill and a wide range of contributions are needed if public health programmes are to make the most impact. The different domains of practice help to construct a basis for understanding the necessary elements of the public health system and their interactions. Using teenage pregnancy as a case study of a public health programme highlights the characteristics of the model. It demonstrates not only the importance of the role of directors of public health in taking a population-based overview, but also the need for multi-sectoral, multidisciplinary working. The relevance of the public health approach not only to primary care but also to the hospital-based sector becomes apparent, as does its relevance to communities, voluntary sector and local government. Integration of the three domains, a common definition and the framework for the public health system will support effective delivery of health improvement.