Failure of hydroxyapatite-coated acetabular cups. Ten-year follow-up of 85 Landos Atoll arthroplasties

Between March 1990 and May 1991 we performed 85 primary total hip replacements in 74 patients using the Landos Atoll hydroxyapatite (HA)-coated cup and the Corail HA-coated stem. The patients were followed up for a mean of ten years. Of the 85 cups, 26 (31%) have already been revised and a further six are radiologically unstable and awaiting revision. Two femoral stems have been revised for infection without loosening. The retrieved acetabular cups were studied by SEM and image-processing techniques to quantify the amount of residual HA on the cup. This was correlated with the clinical variables and modes of failure. The residual HA (as a percentage of the surface) on the loose cups correlated negatively with the duration of implantation (r = -0.732, p < 0.001). Six cups were stable at revision and had more residual HA coating than those which were loose (p < 0.01). The rate of failure of the Landos Atoll HA-coated, smooth hemispherical cup with screw fixation is unacceptably high. Resorption of the HA coating is markedly increased in loose cups compared with stable cups. HA coating cannot substitute for stable mechanical fixation.     

Revision for aseptic loosening of uncemented cups in 4,352 primary total hip prostheses: A report from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register

From September 1987 until January 1994 the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register recorded 5,021 primary total hip replacements performed with uncemented acetabular components. We compared the survival until revision for aseptic loosening of the cup, in the 11 commonest types (n 4,352).

The overall cumulative revision rate for the acetabular components was 3.2% after 5 years and 7.1 YO after 6 years, with large differences among the designs.

With the hydroxyapatite (HA)-coated cups and the hemispheric porous-coated cups, the failure rate was less than 0.1 YO. Of the unthreaded hemispheric porous-coated cups, Harris-Galante and Gemini (n 626), none had been revised, and of the HA-coated cups, Atoll and Tropic (n 1,943), only 1 had been revised.

For the threaded uncoated metal-backed cups, the results varied from no revisions of the PM cups (n 148) to a cumulative 6-year revision rate of 21 YO for the Ti-Fit (n 300). The all-polyethylene Endler cups (n 334) had a cumulative revision rate of 14%.

Women and patients with inflammatory arthritis had poorer results. However, the type and the design of the cups were of far greater importance for the results than patient-related factors.     

Revision for aseptic loosening of uncemented cups in 4,352 primary total hip prostheses: A report from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register

From September 1987 until January 1994 the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register recorded 5,021 primary total hip replacements performed with uncemented acetabular components. We compared the survival until revision for aseptic loosening of the cup, in the 11 commonest types (n 4,352).

The overall cumulative revision rate for the acetabular components was 3.2% after 5 years and 7.1 YO after 6 years, with large differences among the designs.

With the hydroxyapatite (HA)-coated cups and the hemispheric porous-coated cups, the failure rate was less than 0.1 YO. Of the unthreaded hemispheric porous-coated cups, Harris-Galante and Gemini (n 626), none had been revised, and of the HA-coated cups, Atoll and Tropic (n 1,943), only 1 had been revised.

For the threaded uncoated metal-backed cups, the results varied from no revisions of the PM cups (n 148) to a cumulative 6-year revision rate of 21 YO for the Ti-Fit (n 300). The all-polyethylene Endler cups (n 334) had a cumulative revision rate of 14%.

Women and patients with inflammatory arthritis had poorer results. However, the type and the design of the cups were of far greater importance for the results than patient-related factors.     

Effects of hydroxyapatite coating of cups used in hip revision arthroplasty: A Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register study of 1,780 revisions

Background and purpose

Coating of acetabular revision implants with hydroxyapatite (HA) has been proposed to improve ingrowth and stability. We investigated whether HA coating of revision cups can reduce the risk of any subsequent re-revision.

Methods

We studied uncemented cups either with or without HA coating that were used at a primary acetabular revision and registered in the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register (SHAR). 2 such cup designs were identified: Harris-Galante and Trilogy, both available either with or without HA coating. These cups had been used as revision components in 1,780 revisions of total hip arthroplasties (THA) between 1986 and 2009. A Cox proportional hazards model including the type of coating, age at index revision, sex, cause of cup revision, cup design, the use of bone graft at the revision procedure, and the type of cup fixation at primary THA were used to calculate adjusted risk ratios (RRs with 95% CI) for re-revision for any reason or due to aseptic loosening.

Results

71% of the cups were coated with HA and 29% were uncoated. At a mean follow-up time of 6.9 (0–24) years, 159 (9%) of all 1,780 cups had been re-revised, mostly due to aseptic loosening (5%), dislocation (2%), or deep infection (1%). HA coating had no significant influence on the risk of re-revision of the cup for any reason (RR = 1.4, CI: 0.9–2.0) or due to aseptic loosening (RR = 1.1, 0.6–1.9). In contrast, HA coating was found to be a risk factor for isolated liner re-revision for any reason (RR = 1.8, CI: 1.01–3.3). Age below 60 years at the index cup revision, dislocation as the cause of the index cup revision, uncemented cup fixation at primary THA, and use of the Harris-Galante cup also increased the risk of re-revision of the cup. In separate analyses in which isolated liner revisions were excluded, bone grafting was found to be a risk factor for re-revision of the metal shell due to aseptic loosening (RR = 2.1, CI: 1.05–4.2).

Interpretation

We found no evidence to support the notion that HA coating improves the performance of the 2 studied cup designs in revision arthroplasty. In contrast, patient-related factors such as younger age and dislocation as the reason for cup revision, and technical factors such as the choice of revision cup were found to influence the risk of subsequent re-revision of the cup. The reason for inferior results after revision of uncemented cups is not known, but it is possible that these hips more often had pronounced bone loss at the index cup revision.The most common cause of re-revision of the hip after revision surgery is failure of the acetabular component (Swedish Hip Arthrolasty Register (SHAR) 2010). Acetabular revision with cemented implants has shown up to 20% failure at 10 years of follow-up, whereas contemporary designs of uncemented acetabular cups have substantially reduced this failure rate (Callaghan et al. 1985, Kavanagh et al. 1985, Katz et al. 1997, Lie et al. 2004). Loosening of the primary acetabular component often leaves substantial bone loss and a sclerotic acetabular bed. Fixation of revision cups is therefore demanding, and several techniques have been used to restore bone loss and achieve long-term fixation of the revision cup—such as screw fixation, bone grafting, and different cup designs (Palm et al. 2007, Pulido et al. 2011). The use of hydroxyapatite (HA) coating on cups used as revision implants has been proposed to be an improvement over uncoated cups (Dorairajan et al. 2005, Geerdink et al. 2007).HA is the main inorganic component of human bone. It has therefore been hypothesized that coating of metallic implants with HA enhances ingrowth of bone and thus leads to improved stability (Soballe et al. 1999). Indeed, some HA-coated cups perform well and are still in use, while other HA-coated cups have shown high failure rates in the long term. For instance, inferior results were achieved with the Romanus cup where the combination of an inferior locking mechanism of the liner with an inferior type of polyethylene resulted in excessive osteolysis in the acetabular region (Puolakka et al. 1999, Lyback et al. 2004, Lazarinis et al. 2010, SHAR 2010). Due to the relatively small numbers of revision procedures, very few authors have reported results after hip revision arthroplasty using HA-coated implants. To our knowledge, there have been no registry studies specifically investigating the performance of HA-coated hip revision implants. Thus, the question of whether the use of HA coating on revision cups is beneficial remains to be answered.In this study, we analyzed the outcome of acetabular revision surgery using uncemented cups with or without HA coating recorded in the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register (SHAR). Our hypothesis was that coating of revision acetabular cups with HA reduces the risk of re-revision of the acetabular component inserted. The primary endpoint was re-revision of the acetabular component for any reason and the secondary endpoint was re-revision of the cup due to aseptic loosening.     

A Case of Pseudarthrosis of the Neck of the Femur,Treated by the Method of Extra-Articular Ostesynthesis

Background and purpose Monoblock acetabular cups represent a subtype of uncemented cups with the polyethylene liner molded into a metal shell, thus eliminating—or at least minimizing—potential backside wear. We hypothesized that the use of monoâ€?block cups could reduce the incidence of osteolysis and aseptic loosening, and thus improve survival compared to modular designs.

Patients and methods We identified all 210 primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) procedures in the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register that used uncemented monoblock cups during the period 1999–2010. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses with adjustment for age, sex, and other variables were used to calculate survival rates and adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) of the revision risk for any reason. 1,130 modular cups, inserted during the same time period, were used as a control group.

Results There was a nearly equal sex distribution in both groups. Median age at the index operation was 47 years in the monoblock group and 56 years in the control group (p < 0.001). The cumulative 5-year survival with any revision as the endpoint was 95% (95% CI: 91–98) for monoblock cups and 97% (CI: 96–98) for modular cups (p = 0.6). The adjusted HR for revision of monoblock cups compared to modular cups was 2 (CI: 0.8–6; p = 0.1). The use of 28-mm prosthesis heads rather than 22-mm heads reduced the risk of cup revision (HR = 0.2, CI: 0.1–0.5; p = 0.001).

Interpretation Both cups showed good medium-term survival rates. There was no statistically significant difference in revision risk between the cup designs. Further review of the current patient population is warranted to determine the long-term durability and risk of revision of monoblock cup designs.     

Wear and migration of highly cross‐linked and conventional cemented polyethylene cups with cobalt chrome or Oxinium femoral heads: A randomized radiostereometric study of 150 patients

This randomized study was performed to compare wear and migration of five different cemented total hip joint articulations in 150 patients. The patients received either a Charnley femoral stem with a 22.2 mm head or a Spectron EF femoral stem with a 28 mm head. The Charnley articulated with a γ‐sterilized Charnley Ogee acetabular cup. The Spectron EF was used with either EtO‐sterilized non‐cross‐linked polyethylene (Reflection All‐Poly) or highly cross‐linked (Reflection All‐Poly XLPE) cups, combined with either cobalt chrome (CoCr) or Oxinium femoral heads. The patients were followed with repeated RSA measurements for 2 years. After 2 years, the EtO‐sterilized non‐cross‐linked Reflection All‐Poly cups had more than four times higher proximal penetration than its highly cross‐linked counterpart. Use of Oxinium femoral heads did not affect penetration at 2 years compared to heads made of CoCr. Further follow‐up is needed to evaluate the benefits, if any, of Oxinium femoral heads in the clinical setting. The Charnley Ogee was not outperformed by the more recently introduced implants in our study. We conclude that this prostheses still represents a standard against which new implants can be measured. © 2011 Orthopaedic Research Society Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 29: 1222–1229, 2011     

Cemented first-time revision using Charnley cups: clinical outcome after 7 to 15 years follow-up

Forty-six consecutive polyethylene cups used in cemented first-time revision of the acetabulum were evaluated at repeated occasions up to mean 10.7 years (range, 0.5-16.3 years). At the last follow-up, 3 cups had been revised (6.5%), 2 because of loosening and 1 because of fracture of the acetabulum. Furthermore, 4 were radiographically loose, corresponding to a radiographic loosening rate of 13% and a mechanical failure rate (revision or radiographic loosening) of 15.2%. Presence of rheumatoid arthritis was the only predictor of mechanical failure (relative risk [RR] = 7.7, 95% confidence limits, 1.7-36.2; P =.002). In patients without rheumtoid arthritis, there was only 1 (2.6%) revision and 3 of 39 cases (7.7%) with mechanical failure. Recementation of a Charnley cup in first-time revisions results in a low failure rate in an elderly, nonrheumatoid arthritis population with small or moderate bone deficiencies.     

Outcome in design-specific comparisons between highly crosslinked and conventional polyethylene in total hip arthroplasty

Background and purpose — Most registry studies regarding highly crosslinked polyethylene (XLPE) have focused on the overall revision risk. We compared the risk of cup and/or liner revision for specific cup and liner designs made of either XLPE or conventional polyethylene (CPE), regarding revision for any reason and revision due to aseptic loosening and/or osteolysis.

Patients and methods — Using the Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association (NARA) database, we identified cup and liner designs where either XLPE or CPE had been used in more than 500 THAs performed for primary hip osteoarthritis. We assessed risk of revision for any reason and for aseptic loosening using Cox regression adjusted for age, sex, femoral head material and size, surgical approach, stem fixation, and presence of hydroxyapatite coating (uncemented cups).

Results — The CPE version of the ZCA cup had a risk of revision for any reason similar to that of the XLPE version (p = 0.09), but showed a 6-fold higher risk of revision for aseptic loosening (p < 0.001). The CPE version of the Reflection All Poly cup had an 8-fold elevated risk of revision for any reason (p < 0.001) and a 5-fold increased risk of revision for aseptic loosening (p < 0.001). The Charnley Elite Ogee/Marathon cup and the Trilogy cup did not show such differences.

Interpretation — Whether XLPE has any advantage over CPE regarding revision risk may depend on the properties of the polyethylene materials being compared, as well as the respective cup designs, fixation type, and follow-up times. Further research is needed to elucidate how cup design factors interact with polyethylene type to affect the risk of revision.     

Charnley cups retained during revision of the femoral component: Repeated clinical and radiographic observations of 49 cups for 7-15 years

This article concerns 49 consecutive polyethylene cups retained in cemented first revisions of the femoral component and evaluated on several occasions 7-15 years after the index operation. At the last follow-up 5 cups were revised, 3 were radiographically loose, 1 was revised because of recurrent dislocation and 1 stable cup was revised because the surgeon wished to use a 28 mm head. Moreover, 1 unrevised cup was radiographically loose. This corresponded to a mechanical failure rate of 0.1 (5/49) and revision rate of 0.1 (4/49). 3 cups which were radiographically loose (100% radiolucency) had not been revised when the stem was exchanged. If these cups were excluded, the revision rate would have dropped to 0.02 (1/46) and the mechanical failure rate to 0.04 (2/46). This indicates the importance of careful preoperative radiographic evaluation on both AP and lateral views. Progression of radiolucent lines always occurred as an increase in extension from the periphery to the central region of the interface. In conclusion, Charnley cups with non-circumferential radiolucent lines and little, if any, wear can be retained without compromising the longevity of the implant. However, it should be stressed that this conclusion is based on a patient population in which four-fifths of the patients at the index operation were 65 years of age or older.     

Charnley cups retained during revision of the femoral component: Repeated clinical and radiographic observations of 49 cups for 7-15 years

This article concerns 49 consecutive polyethylene cups retained in cemented first revisions of the femoral component and evaluated on several occasions 7-15 years after the index operation. At the last follow-up 5 cups were revised, 3 were radiographically loose, 1 was revised because of recurrent dislocation and 1 stable cup was revised because the surgeon wished to use a 28 mm head. Moreover, 1 unrevised cup was radiographically loose. This corresponded to a mechanical failure rate of 0.1 (5/49) and revision rate of 0.1 (4/49). 3 cups which were radiographically loose (100% radiolucency) had not been revised when the stem was exchanged. If these cups were excluded, the revision rate would have dropped to 0.02 (1/46) and the mechanical failure rate to 0.04 (2/46). This indicates the importance of careful preoperative radiographic evaluation on both AP and lateral views. Progression of radiolucent lines always occurred as an increase in extension from the periphery to the central region of the interface. In conclusion, Charnley cups with non-circumferential radiolucent lines and little, if any, wear can be retained without compromising the longevity of the implant. However, it should be stressed that this conclusion is based on a patient population in which four-fifths of the patients at the index operation were 65 years of age or older.     

Charnley cups retained during revision of the femoral component: repeated clinical and radiographic observations of 49 cups for 7-15 years.

This article concerns 49 consecutive polyethylene cups retained in cemented first revisions of the femoral component and evaluated on several occasions 7-15 years after the index operation. At the last follow-up 5 cups were revised, 3 were radiographically loose, 1 was revised because of recurrent dislocation and 1 stable cup was revised because the surgeon wished to use a 28 mm head. Moreover, 1 unrevised cup was radiographically loose. This corresponded to a mechanical failure rate of 0.1 (5/49) and revision rate of 0.1 (4/49). 3 cups which were radiographically loose (100% radiolucency) had not been revised when the stem was exchanged. If these cups were excluded, the revision rate would have dropped to 0.02 (1/46) and the mechanical failure rate to 0.04 (2/46). This indicates the importance of careful preoperative radiographic evaluation on both AP and lateral views. Progression of radiolucent lines always occurred as an increase in extension from the periphery to the central region of the interface. In conclusion, Charnley cups with non-circumferential radiolucent lines and little, if any, wear can be retained without compromising the longevity of the implant. However, it should be stressed that this conclusion is based on a patient population in which four-fifths of the patients at the index operation were 65 years of age or older.     

Femoral head size is a risk factor for total hip luxation: a study of 42,987 primary hip arthroplasties from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register

On the basis of the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register, which has recorded nearly all primary hip prostheses and revisions in Norway since 1987, we studied risk factors for prosthesis luxation leading to revision. 7 prosthesis brand combinations used in 42,987 primary operations were included from 1987-2000. We found that femoral head size was an important risk factor; 28 mm heads led to revision more often than 32 mm ones (failure rate ratio (FRR) 4.0, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.2-7.3). Charnley (22 mm head) performed equally well or better than the 28 mm heads. The Exeter stem and cup is the type of prosthesis on the Norwegian market with more than two femoral head sizes (26, 28, 30, 32 mm) and 26 mm heads led to revision due to luxation significantly more often than 30 mm heads (FRR 4.1, 95%CI 2.2-8.1). Old age, preoperative diagnosis, and choice of prosthesis brand combination were also important factors affecting the revision rate due to luxation. A posterior approach increased the risk of revision more than a lateral one (FRR 1.9, 95% CI 1.4-2.5). Gender, trochanteric osteotomy and duration of the operation did not affect the results.     

Tuberculosis of the sternoclavicular joints

On the basis of the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register, which has recorded nearly all primary hip prostheses and revisions in Norway since 1987, we studied risk factors for prosthesis luxation leading to revision. 7 prosthesis brand combinations used in 42,987 primary operations were included from 1987-2000. We found that femoral head size was an important risk factor; 28 mm heads led to revision more often than 32 mm ones (failure rate ratio (FRR) 4.0, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.2-7.3). Charnley (22 mm head) performed equally well or better than the 28 mm heads. The Exeter stem and cup is the type of prosthesis on the Norwegian market with more than two femoral head sizes (26, 28, 30, 32 mm) and 26 mm heads led to revision due to luxation significantly more often than 30 mm heads (FRR 4.1, 95%CI 2.2-8.1). Old age, preoperative diagnosis, and choice of prosthesis brand combination were also important factors affecting the revision rate due to luxation. A posterior approach increased the risk of revision more than a lateral one (FRR 1.9, 95%CI 1.4-2.5). Gender, trochanteric osteotomy and duration of the operation did not affect the results.     

Femoral head size is a risk factor for total hip luxation

On the basis of the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register, which has recorded nearly all primary hip prostheses and revisions in Norway since 1987, we studied risk factors for prosthesis luxation leading to revision. 7 prosthesis brand combinations used in 42,987 primary operations were included from 1987-2000. We found that femoral head size was an important risk factor; 28 mm heads led to revision more often than 32 mm ones (failure rate ratio (FRR) 4.0, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.2-7.3). Charnley (22 mm head) performed equally well or better than the 28 mm heads. The Exeter stem and cup is the type of prosthesis on the Norwegian market with more than two femoral head sizes (26, 28, 30, 32 mm) and 26 mm heads led to revision due to luxation significantly more often than 30 mm heads (FRR 4.1, 95%CI 2.2-8.1). Old age, preoperative diagnosis, and choice of prosthesis brand combination were also important factors affecting the revision rate due to luxation. A posterior approach increased the risk of revision more than a lateral one (FRR 1.9, 95%CI 1.4-2.5). Gender, trochanteric osteotomy and duration of the operation did not affect the results.     

Uncemented cups with and without screw holes in primary THA: a Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register study with 22,725 hips

Background and purpose — Uncemented cups in total hip arthroplasty (THA) are often augmented with additional screws to enhance their primary stability. We investigated whether there is a difference in the risk for revision between cups with screw holes and cups without screw holes.

Patients and methods — We analyzed the risk for cup revision of uncemented cups registered in the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register (SHAR) between 2000 and 2017 with respe ct to the presence of screw holes. Only patients with primary osteoarthritis (OA) were included. 22,725 cups, including 12,354 without screw holes and 10,371 with screw holes, were evaluated. Revision rates at 2 and 10 years after the primary operation were analyzed.

Results — At a median follow-up time of 3.4 years (0–18), 459?cup revisions were reported. The main reasons for cup revision during the whole observation time were infection, 52% of all cup revisions, and dislocation, 26% of all cup revisions. The survival rate with cup revision due to aseptic loosening as endpoint was 99.9% (95% CI 99.8–99.9) at 2 years for both cups with and cups without screw holes, and the survival rates at 10 years were 99.5% (CI 99.3–99.7) and 99.1% (CI 98.6–99.5), respectively. Cups without screw holes showed a decreased risk of revision due to any reason at both 2 years (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.6, CI 0.5–0.8) and 10 years (HR 0.7, CI 0.5–0.9).

Interpretation — We found a very low revision rate for aseptic loosening with modern, uncemented cup designs. Cups with screw holes had an increased risk of revision due to any reason in patients with primary OA     

Survival of 11,390 Continuum cups in primary total hip arthroplasty based on data from the Finnish Arthroplasty Register

Background and purpose — The use of trabecular metal (TM) cups for primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) is increasing. Some recent data suggest that the use of TM in primary THA might be associated with an increased risk of revision. We compared implant survival of Continuum acetabular cups with other commonly used uncemented cups.

Patients and methods — Data on 11,390 primary THAs with the Continuum cup and 30,372 THAs with other uncemented cups (reference group) were collected from the Finnish Arthroplasty Register. Kaplan–Meier survival estimates were calculated; the endpoint was revision for any reason, for infection, or for dislocation. Revision risks were assessed with adjusted Cox multiple regression models. A subgroup analysis on the use of neutral or elevated liners in the Continuum group was made.

Results — The 7-year survivorship of the Continuum group was 94.6% (95% CI 94.0–95.2) versus 95.6% (CI 95.3–95.8) in the reference group for revision for any reason. The risk for revision was higher in the Continuum group than in the reference group both for revision for any reason (HR 1.3 [CI 1.2–1.5)]) and for revision for dislocation (HR 1.9 [CI 1.5–2.3]). There was no difference in the rates of revision because of infection (HR 0.99 [CI 0.78–1.3]). Use of a neutral liner increased the risk for revision due to dislocation in comparison with the use of an elevated rim liner in the Continuum group (HR 1.7 [CI 1.2–2.5]).

Interpretation — THA with Continuum cups is associated with an increased risk of revision compared with other uncemented cups, mainly due to revisions because of dislocation. Our results support the use of an elevated liner when Continuum cups are used for primary THA.     

The Charnley versus the Spectron hip prosthesis: radiographic evaluation of a randomized, prospective study of 2 different hip implants.

A total of 410 hips were randomized to treatment with either a Charnley (206 hips) or a Spectron (204 hips) total hip arthroplasty. The patients were operated on by a standardized procedure using a contemporary cementing technique and were followed after 1, 3, 5 to 6, and 10 years. The postoperative radiographs showed a significantly increased rate of malalignment and consequently low grade of cement mantle quality of the Charnley stem compared to the Spectron. No differences concerning cement mantle quality or positioning were found between the Charnley ogee cup and the metal-backed Spectron. Evaluation of the follow-up radiographs revealed 10 loose Charnley stems and 1 loose Spectron stem and 4 loose Charnley ogee cups and 23 loose Spectron metal-backed cups. The differences of revision rate for the femoral and acetabular components of the 2 prostheses were significant (P = .03, Charnley femoral component more frequent; P = .03, Spectron acetabular component more frequent). The radiographic evaluation strengthened this disparity. Poor wear characteristics of the metal-backed Spectron cup are perhaps the main reason for the highly significant difference in mechanical failure rate between the 2 cups. We therefore propose that metal-backing of cemented cups should be avoided, at least when combined with larger femoral heads. The difficulty in positioning the Charnley stem with an adequate cement mantle, especially in the absence of trochanteric osteotomy, might explain the inferior Charnley stem longevity in this study.     

Wear of polyethylene acetabular cups against alumina femoral heads: 5 prostheses compared in a hip simulator for 35 million walking cycles

5 ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene acetabular cups articulated against alumina femoral heads for 35 million walking cycles in a hip joint simulator designed for wear tests of total hip prostheses. The specimens were from Protek, Biomet, Link, Howmedica and Thackray. In the Howmedica specimen, the wear was zero, and in Link and Thackray practically negligible. In Biomet, however, the wear was noteworthy and in Protek disastrous after 20 million cycles because in these 2 prostheses the head was attached to a titanium-alloy stem by taper-fit: titanium-alloy particles that were removed from the taper because of micromotion between the head and stem were entrapped between the head and cup, adhering to the head and making it rough, which led to severe abrasive wear of the Protek cup. It was worn through at 26 million cycles, the total wear being 3,170 mg. In Biomet, Link and Thackray, the total wear was 124, 5.3 and 17.6 mg, respectively. Polyethylene wear particles may lead to adverse tissue reactions and eventual loosening of the implant. The results indicate that by the use of alumina heads, polyethylene wear can be eliminated, but this advantage may be lost if the head is attached to a titaniumalloy taper.     

Total hip arthroplasty for primary osteoarthrosis in younger patients in the Finnish arthroplasty register. 4,661 primary replacements followed for 0-22 years

BACKGROUND: Many studies have found a higher risk of revision after hip arthroplasty in younger patients. We evaluated the population-based survival of total hip arthroplasty (THA) in patients under 55 years of age and the factors affecting survival. METHODS: The Finnish Arthroplasty Register was established in 1980, and 74,492 primary THAs were entered into the register between 1980 and 2001. 4,661 of these were evaluated, all of which had been performed for primary osteoarthrosis on patients under 55 years of age. RESULTS: Proximally circumferentially porous-coated uncemented stems implanted between 1991 and 2001 had a 10-year survival rate of 99 (95% CI 98.5-99.6)% with aseptic loosening as endpoint. The risk of stem revision due to aseptic loosening was higher in cemented stems than in proximally porous-coated (RR 5.5, p < 0.001) or HA-coated (RR 6.6, p = 0.01) uncemented stems implanted during the same period. According to Cox regression analysis of cups implanted 1991-2001, the risk of revision for all-polyethylene cemented cups was 3.0 times as high as that for press-fit porous-coated uncemented cups with aseptic loosening as endpoint (p = 0.01). However, when the endpoint was defined as any revision (including exchange of liner), there was no longer any difference between these two concepts, the 10-year survival rates being 94 (92.1-95.5)% for press-fit porous-coated uncemented cups and 93 (88.5-97.6)% for all-polyethylene cemented cups (p = 0.9). INTERPRETATION: Modern uncemented stems seem to have better resistance to aseptic loosening than cemented stems in younger patients. Thus, for younger patients, uncemented proximally circumferentially porous- and HA-coated stems are the implants of choice. Press-fit porous- and HA-coated uncemented cups may have better endurance against aseptic loosening than cemented cups in younger patients. However, when all revisions (including exchange of liner) are taken into account, the survival of modern uncemented cups is no better than that of all-poly cemented cups.