Zoledronic acid versus placebo in the treatment of skeletal metastases in patients with lung cancer and other solid tumors: a phase III, double-blind, randomized trial--the Zoledronic Acid Lung Cancer and Other Solid Tumors Study Group.

PURPOSE: To assess the efficacy and safety of zoledronic acid in patients with bone metastases secondary to solid tumors other than breast or prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned to receive zoledronic acid (4 or 8 mg) or placebo every 3 weeks for 9 months, with concomitant antineoplastic therapy. The 8-mg dose was reduced to 4 mg (8/4-mg group). The primary efficacy analysis was proportion of patients with at least one skeletal-related event (SRE), defined as pathologic fracture, spinal cord compression, radiation therapy to bone, and surgery to bone. Secondary analyses (time to first SRE, skeletal morbidity rate, and multiple event analysis) counted hypercalcemia as an SRE. RESULTS: Among 773 patients with bone metastases from lung cancer or other solid tumors, the proportion with an SRE was reduced in both zoledronic acid groups compared with the placebo group (38% for 4 mg and 35% for 8/4 mg zoledronic acid v 44% for the placebo group; P =.127 and P =.023 for 4-mg and 8/4-mg groups, respectively). Additionally, 4 mg zoledronic acid significantly increased time to first event (median, 230 v 163 days for placebo; P =.023), an important end point in this poor-prognosis population, and significantly reduced the risk of developing skeletal events by multiple event analysis (hazard ratio = 0.732; P =.017). Zoledronic acid was well tolerated; the most common adverse events in all treatment groups included bone pain, nausea, anemia, and vomiting. CONCLUSION: Zoledronic acid (4 mg infused over 15 minutes) is the first bisphosphonate to reduce skeletal complications in patients with bone metastases from solid tumors other than breast and prostate cancer.     

Zoledronic acid delays the onset of skeletal-related events and progression of skeletal disease in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of zoledronic acid in patients with bone metastases secondary to renal cell carcinoma (RCC). METHODS: A retrospective subset analysis of patients with RCC enrolled in a multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled study of zoledronic acid was performed. Patients were randomized to receive zoledronic acid (4 or 8 mg as a 15-minute infusion) or placebo with concomitant antineoplastic therapy every 3 weeks for 9 months. The primary efficacy analysis was the proportion of patients with one or more skeletal-related events (SREs), which were defined as pathologic fracture, spinal cord compression, radiation therapy, or surgery to bone. Secondary analyses included time to first SRE, skeletal morbidity rate (events per year), disease progression, and multiple event analysis. RESULTS: In this subset of 74 patients with RCC, zoledronic acid (4 mg) was found to significantly reduce the proportion of patients with an SRE (37% vs. 74% for placebo; P = 0.015). Similarly, zoledronic acid significantly reduced the mean skeletal morbidity rate (2.68 vs. 3.38 for placebo; P = 0.014) and extended the time to the first event (median not reached vs. 72 days for placebo; P = 0.006). A multiple event analysis demonstrated that the risk of developing an SRE was reduced by 61% compared with placebo (hazard ratio of 0.394; P = 0.008). The median time to progression of bone lesions was significantly longer for patients who were treated with zoledronic acid (P = 0.014 vs. placebo). Zoledronic acid appeared to be well tolerated; the most common adverse events in all treatment groups included bone pain, nausea, anemia, and emesis. CONCLUSIONS: Zoledronic acid (4 mg as a 15-minute infusion) demonstrated significant clinical benefit in patients with bone metastases from RCC, suggesting that further investigation of zoledronic acid in this patient population is warranted.     

Long-term efficacy and safety of zoledronic acid compared with pamidronate disodium in the treatment of skeletal complications in patients with advanced multiple myeloma or breast carcinoma: a randomized, double-blind, multicenter, comparative trial

BACKGROUND: The goal of the current study was to compare the long-term (25-month) safety and efficacy of zoledronic acid with pamidronate in patients with bone lesions secondary to advanced breast carcinoma or multiple myeloma. METHODS: Patients (n = 1648) were randomized to receive 4 mg or 8 mg (reduced to 4 mg) zoledronic acid as a 15-minute infusion or to receive 90 mg pamidronate as a 2-hour infusion every 3-4 weeks for 24 months. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with at least 1 skeletal-related event (SRE), defined as pathologic fracture, spinal cord compression, radiation therapy, or surgery to bone. Secondary analyses included time to first SRE, skeletal morbidity rate, and multiple-event analysis. Hypercalcemia of malignancy (HCM) was included as an SRE in some secondary analyses. RESULTS: After 25 months of follow-up, zoledronic acid reduced the overall proportion of patients with an SRE and reduced the skeletal morbidity rate similar to pamidronate. Compared with pamidronate, zoledronic acid (4 mg) reduced the overall risk of developing skeletal complications (including HCM) by an additional 16% (P = 0.030). In patients with breast carcinoma, zoledronic acid (4 mg) was significantly more effective than pamidronate, reducing the risk of SREs by an additional 20% (P = 0.025) compared with pamidronate and by an additional 30% in patients receiving hormonal therapy (P = 0.009). Zoledronic acid (4 mg) and pamidronate were tolerated equally well. The most common adverse events included bone pain, nausea, and fatigue. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term follow-up data confirm that zoledronic acid was more effective than pamidronate in reducing the risk of skeletal complications in patients with bone metastases from breast carcinoma and was of similar efficacy in patients with multiple myeloma.     

Long-term efficacy and safety of zoledronic acid in the treatment of skeletal metastases in patients with nonsmall cell lung carcinoma and other solid tumors: a randomized, Phase III, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

BACKGROUND: The authors previously reported the efficacy of a dose of 4 mg of zoledronic acid in reducing skeletal complications in patients with bone metastases secondary to lung carcinoma and other solid tumors (except carcinomas of the breast and prostate). In the current study, they update these results and report the long-term efficacy and safety of 21 months of treatment with zoledronic acid in a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. METHODS: A total of 773 patients were randomized to receive zoledronic acid (4 mg or 8 mg) or placebo via a 15-minute infusion every 3 weeks for 21 months. The 8-mg dose later was reduced to 4 mg (8/4-mg group). The primary efficacy endpoint was the percentage of patients at 21 months with >/= 1 skeletal-related event (SRE) (pathologic fracture, spinal cord compression, radiation therapy to bone, or surgery to bone). Secondary analyses (time to first SRE, annual incidence of SREs, and multiple-event analysis) included hypercalcemia of malignancy. RESULTS: Fewer patients treated with zoledronic acid developed at least 1 SRE at 21 months compared with patients treated with placebo (39% of those treated at the 4-mg dose [P =0.127] and 36% of those treated at the 8/4-mg dose [P = 0.023], compared with 46% of those treated with placebo). Furthermore, 4 mg of zoledronic acid significantly delayed the median time to first SRE (236 days with 4 mg vs. 155 days with placebo; P = 0.009) and significantly reduced the annual incidence of SREs (1.74 per year with the 4-mg dose vs. 2.71 per year with placebo; P = 0.012). Moreover, the 4-mg dose of zoledronic acid was found to reduce the risk of developing a skeletal event by 31% (hazard ratio of 0.693; P = 0.003). Zoledronic acid was found to be well tolerated with long-term use; the most commonly reported adverse events in all treatment groups included bone pain and the transient, acute-phase reactions of nausea, anemia, and emesis. CONCLUSIONS: To the authors' knowledge, zoledronic acid is the first bisphosphonate to demonstrate long-term safety and efficacy in this patient population.     

Bisphosphonates: clinical experience

Bone is a preferred site of metastasis for many solid tumors, and the complications associated with bone metastases can result in significant skeletal morbidity including severe bone pain, pathologic fracture, spinal cord compression, and hypercalcemia of malignancy (HCM). Bisphosphonates are the current standard of care for preventing skeletal complications associated with bone metastases. Clinical trials investigating the benefit of bisphosphonate therapy have used a composite end point defined as a skeletal-related event (SRE) or bone event, which typically includes pathologic fracture, spinal cord compression, radiation or surgery to bone, and HCM. Bisphosphonates have been shown to significantly reduce the incidence of these events in patients with bone metastases. Zoledronic acid (Zometa; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.; East Hanover, NJ), pamidronate (Aredia; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.), clodronate (Bonefos; Anthra Pharmaceuticals; Princeton, NJ), and ibandronate (Bondronat; Hoffmann-La Roche Inc.; Nutley, NJ) all have demonstrated efficacy superior to that of placebo in patients with breast cancer. Zoledronic acid is the only bisphosphonate that has been compared directly with pamidronate, and it was shown by multiple event analysis to be significantly more effective at reducing the risk of an SRE. In patients with prostate cancer, clodronate, etidronate (Didronel; Procter and Gamble Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Cincinnati, OH), and pamidronate have demonstrated transient palliation of bone pain. However, zoledronic acid is the only bisphosphonate to demonstrate both significant and sustained pain reduction and a significantly lower incidence and longer time to onset of SREs compared with placebo. Zoledronic acid is also the only bisphosphonate to demonstrate efficacy in patients with bone metastases from a variety of other solid tumors, including lung cancer and renal cell carcinoma. In conclusion, bisphosphonates effectively reduce skeletal complications in patients with bone metastases from breast cancer, and zoledronic acid has demonstrated the broadest clinical activity in patients with a wide variety of tumor types.     

Efficacy and safety of zoledronic acid in patients with breast cancer metastatic to bone: a multicenter clinical trial

PURPOSE: This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of zoledronic acid in breast cancer patients with newly diagnosed bone metastases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients diagnosed with bone metastases < or = 6 weeks prior to first visit were enrolled. Zoledronic acid (4 mg) was administered via a 15-minute infusion every 3 or 4 weeks for 12 infusions. Skeletal-related events (SREs) were defined as pathologic bone fractures, spinal cord compression, surgery to bone, radiation therapy to bone, and hypercalcemia of malignancy. Primary efficacy end points were the proportion of patients with at least one SRE and the time to first SRE. Secondary end points included pain, analgesic use, and quality of life. RESULTS: Among 312 patients enrolled, 30% experienced at least one SRE during the 12-month study, and 22% experienced only one SRE. The median time to first SRE was not reached in the intent-to-treat population. Mean pain and analgesic scores declined from baseline, and quality-of-life scores remained stable to study end. The most frequently reported adverse events, regardless of relationship to study drug, were pyrexia (22%) and bone pain (10%). Serum creatinine levels did not significantly increase from baseline throughout the study. CONCLUSIONS: Breast cancer patients with newly diagnosed bone metastases who were treated with zoledronic acid had a low incidence of SREs compared with patients who received placebo in randomized phase III trials, and pain was decreased from baseline. This study demonstrated the favorable risk:benefit ratio of zoledronic acid for the prevention of skeletal complications.     

A randomized,placebo-controlled trial of zoledronic acid in patients with hormone-refractory metastatic prostate carcinoma

BACKGROUND: Bone metastases are a common cause of morbidity in patients with prostate carcinoma. We studied the effect of a new bisphosphonate, zoledronic acid, which blocks bone destruction, on skeletal complications in prostate cancer patients with bone metastases. METHODS: Patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer and a history of bone metastases were randomly assigned to a double-blind treatment regimen of intravenous zoledronic acid at 4 mg (N = 214), zoledronic acid at 8 mg (subsequently reduced to 4 mg; 8/4) (N = 221), or placebo (N = 208) every 3 weeks for 15 months. Proportions of patients with skeletal-related events, time to the first skeletal-related event, skeletal morbidity rate, pain and analgesic scores, disease progression, and safety were assessed. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: Approximately 38% of patients who received zoledronic acid at 4 mg, 28% who received zoledronic acid at 8/4 mg, and 31% who received placebo completed the study. A greater proportion of patients who received placebo had skeletal-related events than those who received zoledronic acid at 4 mg (44.2% versus 33.2%; difference = -11.0%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = -20.3% to -1.8%; P =.021) or those who received zoledronic acid at 8/4 mg (38.5%; difference versus placebo = -5.8%, 95% CI = -15.1% to 3.6%; P =.222). Median time to first skeletal-related event was 321 days for patients who received placebo, was not reached for patients who received zoledronic acid at 4 mg (P =.011 versus placebo), and was 363 days for those who received zoledronic acid at 8/4 mg (P =.491 versus placebo). Compared with urinary markers in patients who received placebo, urinary markers of bone resorption were statistically significantly decreased in patients who received zoledronic acid at either dose (P =.001). Pain and analgesic scores increased more in patients who received placebo than in patients who received zoledronic acid, but there were no differences in disease progression, performance status, or quality-of-life scores among the groups. Zoledronic acid at 4 mg given as a 15-minute infusion was well tolerated, but the 8-mg dose was associated with renal function deterioration. CONCLUSION: Zoledronic acid at 4 mg reduced skeletal-related events in prostate cancer patients with bone metastases.     

Continuing benefit of zoledronic acid in preventing skeletal complications in patients with bone metastases

PURPOSE: We previously reported the efficacy of zoledronic acid 4 mg versus placebo (every 3 weeks for 24 months) for the prevention of skeletal-related events (SREs) in men with advanced prostate cancer and bone metastases. We conducted several retrospective exploratory analyses to determine whether zoledronic acid has continuing efficacy during long-term treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This report included analysis of the occurrence of SREs during the extension phase only (months 16-24), analysis of skeletal complications excluding the first SRE at 15 months (core phase), and stratified analysis of patients by history of SREs before study entry. RESULTS: Patients (N=422) were randomized to receive zoledronic acid 4 mg or placebo. For the 132 patients who entered the extension phase, zoledronic acid significantly delayed the onset of first SRE (P=.009) and decreased the risk of developing an SRE by 53% compared with placebo (P=.022). Among all 422 patients, zoledronic acid significantly reduced the incidence of a second on-study SRE (P=.017) and significantly delayed the median time to second SRE compared with placebo (P=.006) at 15 months. Among 144 patients (34%) with a history of SREs before study entry, zoledronic acid significantly reduced the skeletal morbidity rate by 65% (P=.036) and reduced the overall risk of developing an SRE by 40% (P=.028) compared with placebo at 24 months. CONCLUSION: This analysis confirms our previously reported results and suggests that long-term treatment with zoledronic acid provides continuing clinical benefit in patients with advanced prostate cancer, even after the occurrence of SREs.     

Spotlight on Zoledronic Acid in the Management of Bone Metastases and Hypercalcemia of Malignancy

Zoledronic acid (Zometa®) is an effective inhibitor of osteoclast-mediated bone resorption. Zoledronic acid demonstrated efficacy in the reduction of skeletal-related events (SREs) in patients with multiple myeloma or bone metastases secondary to breast cancer, prostate cancer or other solid tumors, or hypercalcemia of malignancy. Zoledronic acid was effective in patients with multiple myeloma or metastatic breast cancer with osteolytic or mixed bone lesions. The proportion of patients who experienced an SRE was similar during 12 months of treatment with zoledronic acid 4mg or pamidronic acid 90mg, but significantly fewer patients receiving zoledronic acid required radiotherapy to bone. Furthermore, in patients with breast cancer and osteolytic lesions, median time to a first SRE was more than 4 months longer with zoledronic acid than with pamidronic acid. In the multiple event analysis in a 12-month extension study (total study duration was 25 months) in patients with breast cancer, zoledronic acid was superior to pamidronic acid, with an 18% reduction in the risk of experiencing an SRE. Both drugs were associated with a slight reduction in pain. Zoledronic acid 4mg, compared with placebo, significantly reduced the proportion of patients with prostate cancer bone metastases experiencing an SRE, particularly pathological fractures, after 15 months’ treatment. The drug also significantly delayed the onset of skeletal complications compared with placebo in patients with prostate cancer or other solid tumors including non-small cell lung cancer. When administered as a single 15-minute intravenous infusion, zoledronic acid 4mg was significantly more effective than pamidronic acid administered as a 2-hour infusion in the treatment of severe hypercalcemia of malignancy, as assessed by complete responses measuring normalized serum calcium concentrations at day 10 after a single dose. Furthermore, zoledronic acid normalized serum calcium concentrations significantly faster than pamidronic acid, and the duration of response and median time to relapse were approximately twice as long in zoledronic acid recipients than in pamidronic acid recipients. Zoledronic acid is well tolerated and has a similar tolerability profile to pamidronic acid. The most commonly reported adverse events included flu-like symptoms (fever, arthralgias, myalgias, and bone pain), fatigue, gastrointestinal reactions, anemia, weakness, dyspnea, and edema. Conclusion: In conjunction with antitumor therapy, zoledronic acid should be considered for routine use to reduce skeletal complications in patients with advanced malignancies involving bone. In patients with hypercalcemia of malignancy, zoledronic acid is expected to become the treatment of choice.     

Clinical benefit of zoledronic acid in patients with lung cancer and other solid tumors: analysis based on history of skeletal complications

The results of a retrospective exploratory analysis of a phase III trial of zoledronic acid in patients with bone metastases secondary to lung cancer or other solid tumors are reported herein to assess the risk of skeletal-related events (SREs) and the efficacy of 4 mg zoledronic acid compared with placebo. The study is based on patient SRE history before study entry. Patients were stratified based on SRE history (eg, pathologic fracture, spinal cord compression, radiation therapy or surgery to bone, or hypercalcemia) before study entry, and SRE incidence over 21 months was analyzed. Of 507 patients randomized to 4 mg zoledronic acid or placebo, 131 completed the 9-month core phase and 69 entered the 12-month extension phase. Before study entry, 347 of 503 patients who were evaluable for efficacy (69%) experienced >/= 1 SRE; these patients had a higher risk of developing an SRE on study than patients with no prior SRE (odds ratio, 1.41). Among patients with an SRE before study entry, zoledronic acid reduced the risk of SREs by 31% (P = 0.009), reduced the mean skeletal morbidity rate (1.96 vs. 2.81 SREs per year for placebo; P = 0.030), and prolonged the median time to first SRE by nearly 4 months (215 days vs. 106 days for placebo; P = 0.011). Among patients with no SRE before study entry (n = 156), zoledronic acid reduced the risk of SREs by 23% (P = 0.308), reduced the mean skeletal morbidity rate (1.34 vs. 2.53 SREs per year for placebo; P = 0.332), and prolonged the median time to first SRE by 2.5 months (P = 0.534). This exploratory analysis demonstrates that patients with a history of SREs are at high risk for subsequent SREs, but zoledronic acid reduces skeletal morbidity regardless of SRE history.     

Clinical benefit of zoledronic acid for the prevention of skeletal complications in advanced prostate cancer

Men with prostate cancer are at high risk of developing bone metastases that can lead to clinically significant skeletal morbidity. Recently, a randomized, placebo-controlled, phase III trial in 422 men with hormone-refractory prostate cancer and bone metastases demonstrated that zoledronic acid (4 mg every 3 weeks) significantly reduced the incidence and onset of skeletal complications and provided significant long-term reductions in bone pain compared with placebo. Patients received zoledronic acid for a 15-month core phase, with the option to continue therapy for 9 more months on the extension phase. To evaluate the continuing benefit of long-term zoledronic acid therapy, retrospective exploratory analyses were conducted based on the incidence of skeletal-related events (SREs; defined as pathologic bone fracture, spinal cord compression, surgery or radiation therapy to bone, or change in antineoplastic therapy for bone pain) occurring only during the extension phase of this trial. Quality of life parameters included assessment with the Brief Pain Inventory. Similar to results reported for the 15-month core phase and the entire 24-month study, the 9-month extension phase demonstrated that zoledronic acid significantly reduced the percentage of patients with an SRE (P = 0.017), prolonged the median time to first SRE (P = 0.036), reduced the annual incidence of SREs by 52% (P = 0.016), and reduced the risk of SREs by 53% (P = 0.022) compared with placebo. Furthermore, zoledronic acid was safe and well tolerated. Therefore, zoledronic acid provides long-term continuing clinical benefit for men with prostate cancer and bone metastases and represents a new therapeutic option for this population.     

Bone-Related Complications and Quality of Life in Advanced Breast Cancer: Results from a Randomized Phase III Trial of Denosumab versus Zoledronic Acid

PURPOSE: Denosumab was shown to be superior to zoledronic acid in preventing skeletal related events (SRE) in patients with breast cancer and bone metastases in a randomized, double-blind phase III study. We evaluated further results from this study related to skeletal complications and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive subcutaneous denosumab 120 mg (n = 1,026) and intravenous placebo, or intravenous zoledronic acid 4 mg (n = 1,020) and subcutaneous placebo every 4 weeks. Analyses reported here include the proportion of patients with one or multiple on-study SREs, time to first radiation to bone, time to first SRE or hypercalcemia of malignancy, and change in HRQoL (functional assessment of cancer therapy-general). RESULTS: Fewer patients receiving denosumab than zoledronic acid had an on-study SRE (31% vs. 36%, P = 0.006). The incidence of first radiation to bone was 12% (n = 123) with denosumab versus 16% (n = 162) with zoledronic acid. Denosumab prolonged the time to first radiation to bone by 26% versus zoledronic acid (HR, 0.74; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.59-0.94, P = 0.012) and prolonged the time to first SRE or hypercalcemia of malignancy by 18% (HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.70-0.95; P = 0.007). Ten percent more patients had a clinically meaningful improvement in HRQoL with denosumab relative to zoledronic acid, regardless of baseline pain levels. CONCLUSIONS: Denosumab was superior to zoledronic acid in reducing bone-related complications of metastatic breast cancer and maintained HRQoL, providing an efficacious, well-tolerated treatment option for patients with bone metastases from breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res; 18(17); 4841-9. ?2012 AACR.     

Efficacy and safety of intravenous bisphosphonates for patients with breast cancer metastatic to bone: a review of randomized, double-blind, phase III trials

Intravenous bisphosphonates are the preferred treatment to prevent skeletal complications for patients with breast cancer and bone metastases. Pamidronate, a single-nitrogen bisphosphonate, was the early standard of care for such patients based on 2 large, placebo-controlled trials involving 754 patients. Zoledronic acid, a new-generation bisphosphonate containing 2 nitrogens, was evaluated in 1130 patients with breast cancer in a large, randomized, comparative, phase III trial with pamidronate. At 25 months, zoledronic acid (4 mg) significantly reduced the overall risk of developing a skeletal-related event (SRE) by an additional 20% versus 90 mg pamidronate by multiple-event analysis. Furthermore, zoledronic acid was at least as effective as pamidronate in reducing the proportion of patients with > or = 1 SRE and in delaying the onset of SREs. Moreover, a retrospective subset analysis of 352 patients with > or = 1 osteolytic lesion proved zoledronic acid more effective than pamidronate in reducing the risk and delaying the onset of SREs. Intravenous ibandronate (6 mg via 1-2-hour infusion) was evaluated in a placebo-controlled, phase III trial of 466 patients and was significantly more effective than placebo in reducing the number of 12-week treatment periods in which an SRE occurred. The safety profiles among all intravenous bisphosphonates were similar; patients treated with intravenous bisphosphonates reported notably less bone pain but a higher incidence of mild to moderate transient infusion-related adverse events (eg, nausea, vomiting, myalgia, and anorexia) compared with placebo. In summary, intravenous bisphosphonates are effective for the treatment of bone metastases in patients with breast cancer and have similar safety profiles, but the shorter infusion time and greater efficacy of zoledronic acid in reducing overall skeletal morbidity provide advantages over other available agents.     

Denosumab for the prevention of skeletal complications in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: comparison of skeletal-related events and symptomatic skeletal events

In this analysis of a phase III trial in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer and bone metastases, treatment with denosumab reduced the risk of skeletal complications vs zoledronic acid regardless of whether the end point was defined as SSE or SRE. Both SSEs and SREs were associated with development of moderate/severe pain among patients with no/mild pain at baseline.BackgroundIn a phase III trial in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) and bone metastases, denosumab was superior to zoledronic acid in reducing skeletal-related events (SREs; radiation to bone, pathologic fracture, surgery to bone, or spinal cord compression). This study reassessed the efficacy of denosumab using symptomatic skeletal events (SSEs) as a prespecified exploratory end point.Patients and methodsPatients with CRPC, no previous bisphosphonate exposure, and radiographic evidence of bone metastasis were randomized to subcutaneous denosumab 120 mg plus i.v. placebo every 4 weeks (Q4W), or i.v. zoledronic acid 4 mg plus subcutaneous placebo Q4W during the blinded treatment phase. SSEs were defined as radiation to bone, symptomatic pathologic fracture, surgery to bone, or symptomatic spinal cord compression. The relationship between SSE or SRE and time to moderate/severe pain was assessed using the Brief Pain Inventory Short Form.ResultsTreatment with denosumab significantly reduced the risk of developing first SSE [HR, 0.78; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.66–0.93; P = 0.005] and first and subsequent SSEs (rate ratio, 0.78; 95% CI 0.65–0.92; P = 0.004) compared with zoledronic acid. The treatment differences in the number of patients with SSEs or SREs were similar (n = 48 and n = 45, respectively). Among patients with no/mild pain at baseline, both SSEs and SREs were associated with moderate/severe pain development (P < 0.0001). Fewer patients had skeletal complications, particularly fractures, when defined as SSE versus SRE.ConclusionIn patients with CRPC and bone metastases, denosumab reduced the risk of skeletal complications versus zoledronic acid regardless of whether the end point was defined as SSE or SRE.     

Long-term efficacy of zoledronic acid for the prevention of skeletal complications in patients with metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer

In a placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial, zoledronic acid (4 mg via a 15-minute infusion every 3 weeks for 15 months) reduced the incidence of skeletal-related events (SREs) in men with hormone-refractory metastatic prostate cancer. Among 122 patients who completed a total of 24 months on study, fewer patients in the 4-mg zoledronic acid group than in the placebo group had at least one SRE (38% versus 49%, difference = -11.0%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = -20.2% to -1.3%; P =.028), and the annual incidence of SREs was 0.77 for the 4-mg zoledronic acid group versus 1.47 for the placebo group (P=.005). The median time to the first SRE was 488 days for the 4-mg zoledronic acid group versus 321 days for the placebo group (P =.009). Compared with placebo, 4 mg of zoledronic acid reduced the ongoing risk of SREs by 36% (risk ratio = 0.64, 95% CI = 0.485 to 0.845; P =.002). Patients in the 4-mg zoledronic acid group had a lower incidence of SREs than did patients in the placebo group, regardless of whether they had an SRE prior to entry in the study. Long-term treatment with 4 mg of zoledronic acid is safe and provides sustained clinical benefits for men with metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer.     

Bisphosphonates in breast cancer.

Breast cancer is the leading type of cancer among women, and bone metastases are common in patients with breast cancer, affecting more than half of all patients with advanced disease. Bisphosphonates are the current standard of care for preventing skeletal complications associated with bone metastases. Clinical trials investigating the benefit of bisphosphonate therapy have used a composite end point defined as a skeletal-related event (SRE) or bone event, which typically includes pathologic fracture, spinal cord compression, radiation or surgery to bone, and hypercalcaemia of malignancy. Bisphosphonates significantly reduced the incidence of these events. Zoledronic acid, pamidronate, clodronate and ibandronate have demonstrated efficacy compared with placebo. Zoledronic acid has also been compared with another active bisphosphonate (i.e. pamidronate) and shown by multiple event analysis to be significantly more effective at reducing the risk of SREs. Bisphosphonates effectively reduce and prevent skeletal complications in patients with bone metastases from breast cancer. Preclinical data suggest that bisphosphonates have antitumour effects. Bisphosphonates may also be of use in the adjuvant setting.     

注射用唑来膦酸治疗肺癌骨转移疼痛的疗效和安全性临床研究

目的：探讨注射用唑来膦酸治疗肺癌骨转移引起疼痛的有效性及安全性。方法：对41例肺癌骨转移且中度以上疼痛患者进行前瞻、随机、双盲、双模拟平行临床研究,研究组21例,为注射用唑来膦酸4mg;对照组20例,为注射用帕米膦酸60mg。在研究期间两组均未进行任何化疗;对治疗前、治疗后第7天和第14天的主要有效指标NRS、缓解率和加用止痛剂及次要有效指标QOL、KPS情况进行比较,并分析不良事件发生和实验室指标异常情况。结果：组内比较：治疗后的NRS、QOL及KPS较治疗前均明显改善。组间比较：治疗后第14天研究组NRS明显低于对照组（3.38vs4.55,P〈0.05）,即治疗后第14天唑来膦酸缓解疼痛的作用明显优于帕米膦酸。疼痛总缓解率：研究组第7天57.1%、第14天61.9%;对照组分别为45%、50%,无统计学差异。在加服即释吗啡人数比较中：研究组1例,而对照组3例。不良事件比较：研究组1例,对照组4例,主要表现发烧、恶心呕吐（与输液较快有关,减慢输液速度后消失）,不良事件与研究药物有关。结论：注射用唑来膦酸治疗肺癌骨转移疼痛疗效明显、具有良好的耐受性和安全性,且给药方便。     

New research findings on zoledronic acid: survival, pain, and anti-tumour effects

OBJECTIVES: To summarize the current evidence for clinical, anti-tumour, and survival benefits from zoledronic acid in patients with genitourinary cancers. METHODS: Studies were identified through MEDLINE searches, review of bibliographies of relevant articles, and review of abstracts from scientific meetings. RESULTS: Among patients with bone metastases from prostate cancer or renal cell carcinoma, zoledronic acid significantly delayed the onset and reduced the incidence of skeletal complications compared with placebo. Zoledronic acid is also the only bisphosphonate that has demonstrated a trend toward improved survival and delayed progression of bone lesions in patients with urologic malignancies. Furthermore, zoledronic acid reduced the incidence of pathologic fracture, a skeletal-related event known to be associated with reduced survival. Bisphosphonates have also demonstrated significant palliative benefits, and preclinical evidence indicates that bisphosphonates may have direct anti-tumour effects. CONCLUSIONS: Zoledronic acid is the only bisphosphonate that has demonstrated statistically significant, long-term clinical benefits through the prevention and delay of skeletal-related events in patients with metastatic prostate cancer or renal cell carcinoma.     

Normalization of bone markers is associated with improved survival in patients with bone metastases from solid tumors and elevated bone resorption receiving zoledronic acid

BACKGROUND: For patients with bone metastases, high N-telopeptide of type I collagen (NTX) levels correlate with increased risks of skeletal-related events and death. However, the relation between NTX decreases and clinical benefits is unclear. METHODS: Correlations between NTX normalization during treatment and clinical outcome were retrospectively analyzed in 3 large, phase 3 trials. Urinary NTX levels were measured at baseline and at Month 3 in patients with bone metastases from breast cancer (BC; n = 578), hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC; n = 472), or nonsmall-cell lung cancer and other solid tumors (NSCLC/OST; n = 291) who received zoledronic acid or control (pamidronate for BC; placebo for HRPC and NSCLC/OST) for up to 24 months. NTX levels were characterized as normal (N; <64 nmol/mmol creatinine) or elevated (E; > or =64 nmol/mmol creatinine). RESULTS: After 3 months of zoledronic acid, most N-group patients maintained normal levels; however, most E-group patients normalized their NTX levels (BC, 81%; HRPC, 70%; NSCLC/OST, 81%). In contrast, NTX levels normalized with pamidronate in 65% of BC, with placebo in 8% of HRPC, and in 17% of NSCLC/OST E-group patients. Normalized NTX correlated with improved overall survival versus persistently elevated NTX (significant for zoledronic acid-treated patients; trend for placebo-treated patients). Moreover, percentage reductions from baseline NTX levels correlated with benefits regardless of whether patients transitioned from E to N. CONCLUSIONS: Zoledronic acid normalizes or maintains normal NTX levels in most patients with bone metastases. Normalized NTX within 3 months of treatment, versus persistently elevated NTX, was associated with reduced risks of skeletal complications and death.     

Effect of zoledronic acid on pain associated with bone metastasis in patients with prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: Zoledronic acid reduces skeletal-related events associated with prostate cancer and has long-term efficacy in pain outcomes. Findings of treatment group differences in pain early in treatment are less reliable. We used a recently recommended analytic approach to examine the effect of zoledronic acid on pain. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a trial of zoledronic acid (n = 214) versus placebo (n = 208), we used the Brief Pain Inventory to assess pain at baseline, 3 weeks, 6 weeks and every 6 weeks thereafter for a total of 60 weeks. We used a modified longitudinal rank test to determine whether clinically meaningful changes in pain were related to treatment group. RESULTS: Seventy-six of 214 patients (35.5%) receiving zoledronic acid and 62 of 208 patients (29.8%) receiving placebo completed the 60-week visit (P = 0.22). In all 11 pain assessments, patients receiving zoledronic acid reported more favorable, clinically meaningful changes in pain scores. Overall, patients receiving zoledronic acid had a 33% chance of a favorable response, compared with 25% for patients receiving placebo (P = 0.04; 95% CI 0.5% to 15.6%). CONCLUSIONS: Zoledronic acid was more likely than placebo to be associated with clinically meaningful reductions in pain. Thus, zoledronic acid may help to avert the pain experienced by patients with progressing metastatic disease secondary to prostate cancer.