Autologous Transplantation in Follicular Lymphoma with Early Therapy Failure: A National LymphoCare Study and Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research Analysis

Patients with follicular lymphoma (FL) experiencing early therapy failure (ETF) within 2 years of frontline chemoimmunotherapy have poor overall survival (OS). We analyzed data from the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR) and the National LymphoCare Study (NLCS) to determine whether autologous hematopoietic cell transplant (autoHCT) can improve outcomes in this high-risk FL subgroup. ETF was defined as failure to achieve at least partial response after frontline chemoimmunotherapy or lymphoma progression within 2 years of frontline chemoimmunotherapy. We identified 2 groups: the non-autoHCT cohort (patients from the NLCS with ETF not undergoing autoHCT) and the autoHCT cohort (CIBMTR patients with ETF undergoing autoHCT). All patients received rituximab-based chemotherapy as frontline treatment; 174 non-autoHCT patients and 175 autoHCT patients were identified and analyzed. There was no difference in 5-year OS between the 2 groups (60% versus 67%, respectively; P?=?.16). A planned subgroup analysis showed that patients with ETF receiving autoHCT soon after treatment failure (≤1 year of ETF; n?=?123) had higher 5-year OS than those without autoHCT (73% versus 60%, P?=?.05). On multivariate analysis, early use of autoHCT was associated with significantly reduced mortality (hazard ratio, .63; 95% confidence interval, .42 to .94; P?=?.02). Patients with FL experiencing ETF after frontline chemoimmunotherapy lack optimal therapy. We demonstrate improved OS when receiving autoHCT within 1 year of treatment failure. Results from this unique collaboration between the NLCS and CIBMTR support consideration of early consolidation with autoHCT in select FL patients experiencing ETF.     

Outcomes of Autologous Stem Cell Transplant Consolidation in Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma: A Mayo Clinic Experience

A paucity of randomized phase III clinical trials in primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) has resulted in no uniform consensus on the optimal strategy for consolidation and conditioning regimens for autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT). The past 2 decades have witnessed a preference for thiotepa (TT)-based conditioning regimens due to superior central nervous system penetration. We retrospectively evaluated outcomes of patients with PCNSL who underwent ASCT at Mayo Clinic, Rochester over the past 2 decades, and the impact of TT-based conditioning regimens. Fifty-six patients underwent transplant for PCNSL, with 25 and 31 patients receiving BEAM (non-thiotepa) and carmustine (BCNU)/TT-based conditioning, respectively. All patients received high-dose methotrexate-based induction therapy. While the BCNU/TT group had higher risk disease features such as high International Extranodal Lymphoma Study Group prognostic score, elevated cerebrospinal fluid protein, and older patient population, there was no significant difference at 2 years post-transplant in progression-free survival (BEAM 68.0% [46.1% to 82.5%] versus BCNU/TT, 65.5% [45.2% to 79.8%], P = .99) or overall survival (OS) (84.0% [62.8% to 93.7%] in the BEAM group versus 81.6% [61.3% to 91.9%] in the BCNU/TT group, P = .95). Disease response status before transplant significantly affected the outcomes as those in complete remission had an OS at 2 years post-transplant of 94.7% (68.1% to 99.2%) in the BEAM group and 90.5% (67.0% to 97.5%) in the BCNU/TT group compared with those in partial response, 57.1% (17.2% to 83.7%) in BCNU/TT group and 50.0% (11.1% to 80.4%) in the BEAM group, respectively (P < .0001). Our retrospective cohort adds to the currently available literature and identifies the disease status before transplant as a significant factor affecting survival.     

Total Body Irradiation Is Safe and Similarly Effective as Chemotherapy-Only Conditioning in Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation for Mantle Cell Lymphoma

Autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) consolidation has become a standard approach for patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), yet there is little consensus on the role of total body irradiation (TBI) as part of high-dose transplantation conditioning. We analyzed 75 consecutive patients with MCL who underwent ASCT at our institution between 2001 and 2011 with either TBI-based (n?=?43) or carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine, melphalan (BEAM; n?=?32) high-dose conditioning. Most patients (97%) had chemosensitive disease and underwent transplantation in first remission (89%). On univariate analysis, TBI conditioning was associated with a trend toward improved PFS (hazard ratio [HR], .53; 95% confidence interval [CI], .28-1.00; P?=?.052) and similar OS (HR, .59; 95% CI, .26-1.35; P?=?.21), with a median follow-up of 6.3 years in the TBI group and 6.6 years in the BEAM group. The 5-year PFS was 66% in the TBI group versus 52% in the BEAM group; OS was 82% versus 68%, respectively. However, on multivariate analysis, TBI-based conditioning was not significantly associated with PFS (HR, .57; 95% CI .24-1.34; P?=?.20), after controlling for age, disease status at ASCT, and receipt of post-transplantation rituximab maintenance. Likewise, early toxicity, nonrelapse mortality, and secondary malignancies were similar in the 2 groups. Our data suggest that both TBI and BEAM-based conditioning regimens remain viable conditioning options for patients with MCL undergoing ASCT.     

A 15-year analysis of early and late autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant in relapsed, aggressive, transformed, and nontransformed follicular lymphoma.

Autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) has been shown to be an effective treatment for follicular lymphoma (FL). We explored our experience in ASCT for FL among all patients treated over a 15-year period from diagnosis through their entire treatment history including relapse post ASCT. All patients who underwent an unpurged ASCT for relapsed, advanced FL between June 1990 and December 2000 were analyzed. After salvage therapy they received melphalan/etoposide/total body irradiation, BCNU, etoposide, cytarabine, melphalan (BEAM), or cyclophosphamide BCNU etoposide (CBV) as conditioning for the ASCT. One hundred thirty-eight patients with a median age of 48 years and a median follow-up of 7.6 years were analyzed. The majority were of the subtype grade 1, nontransformed (FL-NT), having had 1 prior chemotherapy. The progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of the FL-NT at 10 years were 46% and 57%, respectively, and at 5 years for the transformed (FL-T) were 25% and 56%, respectively, of which only the PFS was significantly different (P=.007). The median OS from diagnosis was 16 years for the FL-NT. ASCT positively altered the trend of shorter remissions with subsequent chemotherapies, and there was no difference in OS between those who had 1, 2, or >2 chemotherapies prior to ASCT. Salvage therapy for relapse post ASCT was effective (OS>1 year) in a third of patients. Unpurged ASCT is an effective tool in the treatment of relapsed, aggressive FL-NT and FL-T, is superior to retreatment with standard chemotherapy, is effective at various stages of treatment, is likely to have a beneficial influence on the natural history of this disease, and the disease is amenable to salvage therapy post-ASCT relapse.     

High-dose therapy and autologous stem cell transplantation in first relapse for diffuse large B cell lymphoma in the rituximab era: an analysis based on data from the European Blood and Marrow Transplantation Registry

Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) consolidation remains the treatment of choice for patients with relapsed diffuse large B cell lymphoma. The impact of rituximab combined with chemotherapy in either first- or second-line therapy on the ultimate results of ASCT remains to be determined, however. This study was designed to evaluate the benefit of ASCT in patients achieving a second complete remission after salvage chemotherapy by retrospectively comparing the disease-free survival (DFS) after ASCT for each patient with the duration of the first complete remission (CR1). Between 1990 and 2005, a total of 470 patients who had undergone ASCT and reported to the European Blood and Bone Transplantation Registry with Medical Essential Data Form B information were evaluated. Of these 470 patients, 351 (74%) had not received rituximab before ASCT, and 119 (25%) had received rituximab before ASCT. The median duration of CR1 was 11 months. The median time from diagnosis to ASCT was 24 months. The BEAM protocol was the most frequently used conditioning regimen (67%). After ASCT, the 5-year overall survival was 63% (95% confidence interval, 58%-67%) and 5-year DFS was 48% (95% confidence interval, 43%-53%) for the entire patient population. Statistical analysis showed a significant increase in DFS after ASCT compared with duration of CR1 (median, 51 months versus 11 months; P < .001). This difference was also highly significant for patients with previous exposure to rituximab (median, 10 months versus not reached; P < .001) and for patients who had experienced relapse before 1 year (median, 6 months versus 47 months; P < .001). Our data indicate that ASCT can significantly increase DFS compared with the duration of CR1 in relapsed diffuse large B cell lymphoma and can alter the disease course even in patients with high-risk disease previously treated with rituximab.     

Impact of HIV Infection on Transplant Outcomes after Autologous Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation: A Retrospective Study of Japanese Registry Data

Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is a treatment option for HIV-positive patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) and multiple myeloma (MM). However, the prognosis after ASCT in HIV-positive Japanese patients remains unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of HIV infection on transplant outcomes after ASCT in Japan. Using the national database of the Japan Society for Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation, we retrospectively evaluated patients with NHL (n?=?3862) and MM (n?=?2670) who underwent their first ASCT between 2001 and 2014. The presence of HIV antibody was used to diagnose HIV infection. Fifty-six patients with NHL (1.4%) and 23 with MM (.8%) were positive for HIV antibody. Among patients with NHL overall survival (OS) was lower in HIV-positive patients than in HIV-negative patients (5-year OS: HIV-positive patients, 44% versus HIV-negative patients, 65%; P?<?.001). In a multivariate analysis HIV infection was significantly associated with an increased risk of overall mortality (hazard ratio, 2.30; P?<?.001). The incidence of relapse was higher in HIV-positive patients (P?=?.036), whereas there was a similar incidence of nonrelapse mortality (P?=?.879). OS in patients with MM was similar between those with/without HIV infection (5-year OS: HIV-positive patients, 61% versus HIV-negative patients, 63%; P?=?.988). HIV infection was associated with a higher risk of overall mortality and relapse after ASCT for NHL in a Japanese population.     

Fludarabine and Busulfan versus Fludarabine,Cyclophosphamide, and Rituximab as Reduced-Intensity Conditioning for Allogeneic Transplantation in Follicular Lymphoma

Large, multicenter studies comparing commonly used reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) approaches in follicular lymphoma (FL) have not been performed. Using the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research database, we report the outcomes of the 2 most commonly used RIC approaches, fludarabine and busulfan (Flu/Bu) versus fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab (FCR) in FL patients. We evaluated 200 FL patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) who received RIC with either Flu/Bu (n?=?98) or FCR (n?=?102) during 2008 to 2014. All patients received peripheral blood grafts, and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis was limited to calcineurin inhibitor–based approaches. Median follow-up of survivors in the Flu/Bu and FCR groups was 48 months and 46 months, respectively. On univariate analysis in the Flu/Bu and FCR groups, the 3-year rates of nonrelapse mortality (11% versus 11%, P?=?.94), relapse/progression (18% versus 15%, P?=?.54), progression-free survival (PFS) (71% versus 74%, P?=?.65), and overall survival (OS) (73% versus 81%, P?=?.18) were not significantly different. On multivariate analysis no difference was seen between the FCR and Flu/Bu cohorts in terms of grades II to IV (relative risk [RR],?1.06; 95% confidence interval [CI],?.59 to 1.93; P?=?.84) or grades III to IV (RR,?1.18; 95% CI, .47 to 2.99; P?=?.72) acute GVHD, nonrelapse mortality (RR,?.83; 95% CI, .38 to 1.82; P?=?.64), relapse/progression (RR,?.99; 95% CI, .49 to 1.98; P?=?.97), PFS (RR,?.92; 95% CI, .55 to 1.54; P?=?.76), or OS (RR,?.70; 95% CI, .40 to 1.23; P?=?.21) risk. However, RIC with FCR was associated with a significantly reduced chronic GVHD risk (RR,?.52; 95% CI, .36 to .77; P?=?.001). RIC with either Flu/Bu or FCR in patients with FL undergoing allo-HCT provides excellent 3-year OS, with acceptable rates of nonrelapse mortality. FCR-based conditioning was associated with a lower risk of chronic GVHD.     

Second autologous stem cell transplantation as salvage therapy for multiple myeloma: impact on progression-free and overall survival

The role of a second autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) as salvage therapy is unclear, particularly with the availability of novel agents to treat progressive multiple myeloma (MM). We retrospectively reviewed all MM patients who received a second ASCT as salvage therapy at our center from March 1992 to December 2009. Eighty-one MM patients received a second ASCT for relapsed MM. The median time to relapse after first transplant was 39 months (9.83-100). All patients received reinduction therapy before the second ASCT. The high-dose regimen given before the second ASCT consisted of melphalan (MEL) alone in the majority. Complete response, very good partial response, and partial response were seen in 7.7%, 39.7%, and 50%, respectively, at day 100 post-ASCT; the median time to relapse after the second ASCT was 19 months. Early deaths occurred in 2.6%. Median progression-free survival (PFS) based on the time to myeloma relapse after first ASCT was 9.83 months (relapse ≤ 24 months) and 17.3 months (relapse ≥ 24 months) (P < .05). Median overall survival (OS) was 28.47 months (relapse ≤ 24 months) and 71.3 months (relapse >24 months) (P = .006). Second ASCT is a feasible and safe option for salvage therapy in MM. The best outcome was observed in patients whose time to progression was >24 months after first ASCT, as these patients had a subsequent PFS lasting over 1 year and an OS of almost 6 years.     

High-Dose Chemotherapy with Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma: Data From the Japan Society for Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Registry

High-dose chemotherapy (HDT) with autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) has been shown to improve the prognosis of patients with central nervous system (CNS) lymphoma. We queried the Japan Society for Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Registry for 2006 to 2015 to analyze the outcomes of 102 patients with primary CNS lymphoma (PCNSL) who underwent first HDT/ASCT. The median patient age was 54 years (range, 20 to 74 years), and 65 patients were treated in an upfront setting. With a median duration of follow-up of 44 months, the 5-year overall survival (OS) and progession-free survival (PFS) were 54.9% and 38.4%, respectively. There were no significant differences in OS and PFS between upfront and salvage HDT/ASCT. Because thiotepa, a key agent in HDT/ASCT for PCNSL, has been unavailable since 2011 in Japan, the HDT regimens used were not uniform. Thiotepa-containing HDT was received by 16 out of 32 patients before 2010, but by only 2 of 70 patients after 2011. Thiotepa-containing HDT was associated with better PFS (P = .019), lower relapse (P = .042), and a trend toward a survival benefit. In multivariate analysis, noncomplete remission at HDT/ASCT was an independent predictor for OS (hazard ratio [HR], 2.40; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.25 to 4.58; P = .008) and thiotepa-containing HDT remained significant for PFS (HR, .42; 95% CI, .19 to .95; P = .038). These results confirm the activity of thiotepa-containing regimens.     

Outcomes after Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients with Double-Hit and Double-Expressor Lymphoma

Double-hit lymphomas (DHLs) and double-expressor lymphomas (DELs) are associated with resistance to frontline and salvage immunochemotherapy, as well as autologous stem cell transplantation (SCT). We hypothesized that allogeneic SCT (alloSCT) could overcome the chemoresistance associated with DEL/DHL. We retrospectively studied the impact of DEL/DHL status in a multicenter cohort of patients who underwent alloSCT for relapsed/refractory (rel/ref) aggressive B cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (B-NHL). Seventy-eight patients transplanted at 3 centers in whom tumor tissue was available for immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization were enrolled; 47% had DEL and 13% had DHL. There were no significant differences in 4-year progression-free (PFS) or overall survival (OS) between patients with DEL compared with patients without DEL (PFS 30% versus 39%, P?=?.24; OS 31% versus 49%, P?=?.17) or between patients with DHL compared with patients without DHL (PFS 40% versus 34%, P?=?.62; OS 50% versus 38%, P?=?.46). The lack of association between DEL or DHL and outcome was confirmed in multivariable models, although inadequate sample size may have limited our ability to detect significant differences. In our cohort alloSCT produced durable remissions in patients with rel/ref aggressive B-NHL irrespective of DEL and DHL status, justifying its consideration in the treatment of patients with rel/ref DEL/DHL.     

Phase II Trial of High-Dose Gemcitabine/Busulfan/Melphalan with Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation for Primary Refractory or Poor-Risk Relapsed Hodgkin Lymphoma

We conducted a prospective phase 2 trial of gemcitabine, busulfan and melphalan (Gem/Bu/Mel) with autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in patients with primary refractory or poor-risk relapsed Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) (ie, extranodal relapse or within 1 year of frontline therapy). The trial was powered to detect an improvement in 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) from a historical 50% using a BEAM regimen (carmustine/etoposide/cytarabine/melphalan) to 65%. We compared the study population with all other concurrent patients who were eligible for the trial but instead received the BEAM regimen at our center. No patient received post-ASCT maintenance therapy. The Gem/Bu/Mel trial enrolled 80 patients with a median age of 31 years, 41% with primary refractory HL and 59% with relapsed HL (36% extranodal relapses), and 30% with positron emission tomography (PET)-positive lesions at ASCT. The concurrent BEAM (n?=?45) and Gem/Bu/Mel cohorts were well balanced except for higher rates of bulky relapse and PET-positive tumors in the Gem/Bu/Mel cohort. There were no transplantation-related deaths in either cohort. At a median follow-up of 34.5 months (range, 26 to 72 months), Gem/Bu/Mel was associated with better 2-year PFS (65% versus 51%; P?=?.008) and overall survival (89% versus 73%; P?=?.0003). In conclusion, our data show that Gem/Bu/Mel is safe, in this nonrandomized comparison yielding improved outcomes compared with a concurrently treated and prognostically matched cohort of patients with primary refractory or poor-risk relapsed HL receiving BEAM.     

Comparison between Upfront Transplantation and different Pretransplant Cytoreductive Treatment Approaches in Patients with High-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome and Secondary Acute Myelogenous Leukemia

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is the only curative treatment for patients with advanced myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and secondary acute myelogenous leukemia (sAML), but in the absence of prospective trials the impact of pretransplant cytoreduction is controversially discussed. We retrospectively analyzed the outcome of 165 patients with MDS and excess blasts (n = 126, 76%) and sAML (n = 39, 24%) according to a pretransplant strategy. Sixty-seven patients (41%) were directly transplanted (upfront group), whereas 98 patients (59%) had received pretransplant cytoreductive treatment (induction chemotherapy [CTX], n = 64; hypomethylating agents [HMAs], n = 34) resulting in a significantly higher complete remission rate in the CTX group (59% versus HMA 18%, P < .0001). Estimated rates of 5-year overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) for the entire group were 54% and 39%, respectively. The 5-year OS rates of the upfront, CTX, and HMA groups were 61%, 50%, and 45%, respectively (P = .116), whereas RFS rates were 38%, 41%, and 38% (P = .926). Cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) and nonrelapse mortality (NRM) did not differ between treatment groups. In the upfront group no difference regarding OS and RFS was seen with respect to pretransplant blast count (>10% versus <10%). In multivariate analyses type of pretransplant strategy did not have an effect on OS, RFS, CIR, and NRM, whereas cytogenetics (OS, RFS, CIR), reduced-intensity conditioning (OS, RFS, CIR), and an unrelated donor (RFS, CIR) were identified as negative predictors. When compared with the upfront group, 5-year OS was significantly lower in patients with CTX-refractory disease (34% versus 64%, P = .0346) and by clear trend in HMA nonresponders (42% versus 61%, P = .073), whereas RFS did not differ significantly. In further support of the concept, that pretransplant therapy may favor the selection of resistant clones, patients in the upfront group had a higher likelihood to respond to HMAs as salvage therapy for relapse in comparison with pretreated patients (complete remission, 58% versus 10%; P = .0005) and a higher 2-year OS rate after relapse (59% versus 19%, P = .0001). These data suggest that an upfront transplant strategy is at least not inferior to pretransplant cytoreduction and may be augmented by HMAs + donor lymphocyte infusion salvage therapy in case of relapse after allo-HSCT.     

Phase I/II Study of Bortezomib-BEAM and Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Relapsed Indolent Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma,Transformed, or Mantle Cell Lymphoma

A phase I/II trial was designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of adding bortezomib to standard BEAM (BCNU, etoposide, cytarabine, melphalan) and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (ASCT). Eligible patients had relapsed/refractory indolent or transformed non-Hodgkin lymphoma or mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) that was relapsed/refractory or in first partial (PR) or complete remission (CR). Patients received bortezomib on days −11, −8, −5, and −2 before ASCT. Phase I had 4 dose cohorts (.8, 1, 1.3, and 1.5 mg/m²) and 3 patients were accrued to each. Any nonhematological ASCT-related toxicity >2 on the Bearman scale occurring between day −11 and engraftment defined the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). After the MTD has been reached, another 20 patients were enrolled at this dose to determine a preliminary overall response rate (ORR). Patients who were in CR or PR at day +100 were considered responders. The study enrolled 42 patients through August 14, 2009. The median age was 58 (range, 34 to 73) years, with 33 males and 9 females. The most common diagnoses were MCL (23 patients) and follicular lymphoma (7 patients). The median number of prior therapies was 1 (range, 0 to 6). The median follow-up was 4.88 (range, 1.07 to 6.98) years. Thirteen patients were treated in phase I and 29 patients were treated in phase II. The MTD was initially determined to be 1.5 mg/m² but it was later decreased to 1 mg/m² because of excessive gastrointestinal toxicity and peripheral neuropathy. The ORR was 95% at 100 days and 87% at 1 year. For all 38 evaluable patients at 1 year, responses were CR 84%, PR 1%, and progressive disease 13%. Progression-free survival (PFS) was 83% (95% CI, 68% to 92%) at 1 year, and 32% (15% to 51%) at 5 years. Overall survival (OS) was 91% (95% CI, 79% to 96%) at 1 year and 67% (50% to 79%) at 5 years. The most common National Cancer Institute grade 3 toxicities were neutropenic fever (59%), anorexia (21%), peripheral neuropathy (19%), orthostatic hypotension/vasovagal syncope (16%), and 1 patient failed to engraft. Compared with 26 MCL in CR1 historic controls treated with BEAM and ASCT, PFS was 85% and 43% for the BEAM group versus 87% and 57% for those who received bortezomib in addition to standard BEAM (V-BEAM) at 1 and 5 years, respectively (log-rank P = .37). OS was 88% and 50% for the BEAM group versus 96% and 72% for V-BEAM at 1 and 5 years, respectively (log-rank P = .78). In conclusion, V-BEAM and ASCT is feasible. The toxicities were manageable and we did not observe any treatment-related mortalities; however, we did observe an excess of autonomic dysfunction and ileus, which is concerning for overlapping toxicity with BEAM conditioning. Determining relative efficacy of V-BEAM compared to BEAM would require a randomized trial.     

Mobilization-Driven Postconsolidation Therapy in Elderly Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Feasibility and Efficacy of Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation versus Low-Dose Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin

We prospectively evaluated 2 postconsolidation strategies, administered according to the mobilization outcome, in 72 acute myeloid leukemia (AML) fit elderly patients, achieving complete remission after the first high-dose cytarabine-based induction. Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) was performed in patients collecting ≥3 × 10⁶ CD34⁺/kg and low-dose gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO) was performed in poor mobilizers (collecting <3 × 10⁶ CD34⁺/kg). Fifty-five patients (76.3%) underwent peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) mobilization, after first consolidation, and 24 of 55 (44%) collected >3 × 10⁶ CD34⁺ cells/kg. Among the 55 patients eligible for PBSC mobilization, 7 did not receive the planned treatment, 23 were allocated for ASCT, and 25 were allocated for GO on an intention-to-treat basis. With a median follow-up of 70 months (range, 24 to 124), 20 of 55 patients are alive, 18 of them in continuous complete remission. The 8-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) are, respectively, 35.9% (95% confidence interval [CI] 24% to 49.8%) and 31.2% (95% CI, 21% to 43.8%), median OS and DFS were 22 and 16 months, respectively. In multivariate analysis, postconsolidation treatment and hyperleukocytosis (WBC > 50,000/μL) significantly predicted OS and DFS, whereas secondary AML was significantly associated with a higher relapse rate (83.4% versus 54% of de novo AML). Patients with hyperleukocytosis had 0% 3-year OS versus the 46% (at 8 years) in patients without hyperleukocytosis (P = .01); 57% of patients in the GO arm are alive at 8 years, compared with 25.4% of patients in the ASCT arm, who had an overall relative risk (RR) of death of 2.6 (95% CI, 1.2 to 5.8; P = .02). DFS at 8 years was 45.3% in patients receiving GO, compared with 26% in ASCT arm (RR, 2.1; 95% CI, 1 to 4.3; P = .05). Our study outlines low feasibility and efficacy of ASCT in elderly AML patients, whereas postconsolidation with GO appears safe and effective in this unfavorable setting. The study was registered at Umin Clinical Trial Registry (www.umin.ac.jp/ctr), number R000014052.     

R-BEAM versus Reduced-Intensity Conditioning Regimens in Patients Undergoing Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation for Relapsed Refractory Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma

Allogeneic stem cell transplant (alloSCT) is considered in diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients with chemorefractory disease or who have relapsed after autologous SCT. Here we present the first report of alloSCT using the R-BEAM (rituximab, carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine, melphalan) conditioning regimen in DLBCL patients.We retrospectively compared long-term alloSCT outcomes of DLBCL patients who received either R-BEAM (n = 47) or reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) regimens (n = 23).Seventy patients (median age, 53 years) with DLBCL received alloSCT between January 2005 and December 2017. The median number of pretransplant therapies was 3, and 17 patients (24%) received prior autologous SCT. All received rituximab as a frontline or salvage therapy before alloSCT. The donor was unrelated in 42 patients (60%), and peripheral blood stem cells were commonly used (96%). The 6-month cumulative incidence of grades III to IV acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) was 36.2% and 8.7% for R-BEAM and RIC, respectively (P = .03). Median follow-up of surviving patients after R-BEAM and RIC was 3.1 and 5.5 years, respectively. Three-year overall survival (OS) after R-BEAM and RIC was 34.4% and 43.4%, respectively (P = .48). At 3 years, R-BEAM was associated with a similar relapse rate (25.5% versus 26.1%, P = .96), nonrelapse mortality (NRM; 39.7% versus 39.1%, P = .98), and relapse-free survival (RFS; 34.8% versus 34.7%, P = .75) compared with RIC. In multivariable analysis lower Karnofsky performance score was associated with lower OS (hazard ratio, .96; P = .05), whereas chemorefractory disease was associated with a higher relapse risk (hazard ratio, 8.8; P = .04). No difference in OS, relapse, NRM, or RFS was noticed between R-BEAM and RIC. R-BEAM regimen seems to be feasible and results in equivalent rates of long-term OS, relapse, NRM, and RFS compared with RIC. However, a significantly higher rate of severe acute GVHD was noticed.     

Outcomes of Patients with Light Chain Amyloidosis Who Had Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation with 3 or More Organs Involved

Prior reports have suggested that 3 or more organs involved is a contraindication for autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) in amyloid light chain (AL) amyloidosis. Therefore, most centers limit transplantation to patients who have no more than 2 organs significantly involved. We retrospectively reviewed all patients with AL amyloidosis with ≥3 involved organs and who had ASCT between 1996 and 2015 at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota to assess transplant safety and outcomes. Seventy-five patients with ≥3 organs involved underwent ASCT. Median age at diagnosis was 54 years, and 67% were men. The heart was involved in 95%, followed by the kidneys (84%). Thirty-eight patients (51%) had no induction treatment before ASCT. Full-dose melphalan (200 mg/m²) was given in 45%, and the remainder received 140 mg/m². Overall hematologic response rate was 75%. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 16 and 68 months, respectively. The 100-day mortality was 16%, and 44 patients (59%) died during follow-up. The most common causes of death were cardiovascular events (32%) and progressive amyloidosis (25%). On multivariable analysis, predictors for PFS were Mayo 2012 stage III/IV (relative risk [RR], 3.3; P = .0012) and hematologic response (at least very good partial response; RR, .4; P = .012). An N-terminal pro–brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) level of ≥2000 pg/mL was an independent predictor for shorter PFS (RR, 2.6; P = .013). Predictors for OS included any hematologic response (RR, .12; P = .0015), melphalan 200 mg/m² (RR, .2; P = .014), and Mayo 2012 stage III/IV (RR, 7.7; P = .0002). An NT-proBNP level ≥ 2000 pg/mL was a powerful predictor of OS (RR, 4; P = .013). The number of organs involved (3 versus >3) did not significantly impact PFS or OS. We conclude that the high prevalence and severity of cardiac involvement are the main drivers for the poor outcome in patients who have ≥3 organs involved. Using selection criteria defined for safe transplantation in cardiac amyloidosis should result in low therapy-related mortality independent of the number of organs involved. The severity of cardiac involvement should be the major criterion for transplanting patients with AL amyloidosis that have ≥3 organs involved and not merely the number of organs involved.     

Impact of Donor Type and Melphalan Dose on Allogeneic Transplantation Outcomes for Patients with Lymphoma

We analyzed 186 patients with lymphoma who underwent allogeneic stem cell transplantation (ASCT) with fludarabine-melphalan (FM) conditioning and different types of donors (25 haploidentical [HD], 98 matched unrelated [MUD], and 63 matched related [MRD]) at our institution between September 2009 and January 2018. Patients received fludarabine 160 mg/m² (40 mg/m²/day for 4 days) in combination with 1 dose of melphalan 140 mg/m² (FM140) or 100 mg/m² (FM100). Engraftment was similar among the 3 groups (92%, 89%, and 98%, respectively; P = .7). The 6-month cumulative incidence of grade III-IV acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) was 4% in the HD group, 14% in the MUD group, and 8% in the MRD group (P not significant), and the respective 3-year cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD was 5%, 16%, and 26% (P not significant). The respective 3-year nonrelapse mortality and relapse rates were 31%, 32%, and 10% (HD versus MUD, P = .9; HD versus MRD, P = .02) and 15%, 21%, and 39% (HD versus MUD, P = .4; HD versus MRD, P = .04). At 3 years, progression-free survival (PFS) was 59%, 44%, and 46% (P not significant); overall survival (OS) was 52%, 54%, and 67% (P not significant); and GVHD-free, relapse-free survival was 39%, 31%, and 24% (P not significant). No differences in the 3-year PFS (57% versus 43%; P = .3) and OS (64% versus 58%; P = .7) were seen between patients receiving FM100 and those receiving FM140. Our data demonstrate that in patients with lymphoma, ASCT with HD transplants have similar outcomes as ASCT with HLA-matched transplants, and the FM100 conditioning regimen appears to be at least as effective as the FM140 regimen.     

Favorable Overall Survival with Fully Myeloablative Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation for Follicular Lymphoma

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (Allo-SCT) remains an option for patients with follicular lymphoma (FL). We performed a retrospective analysis to examine long-term disease control and treatment-related mortality (TRM) in a group of patients that underwent transplant for clinically high-risk disease. Thirty-seven patients with indolent FL (follicular small cleaved [FSC], follicular mixed [FM] or FL grades 1 or 2 by WHO criteria) underwent allo-SCT. Patients were in a chemosensitive remission at the time of SCT. The conditioning regimen was typically busulfan-cyclophosphamide (BuCy). Cyclophosphamide-total body irradiation (TBI) was used for unrelated donor SCT. The median age at the time of transplant was 45 years (range: 24-58). The median number of prior chemotherapy regimens was 3 (range: 1-6). Thirty-seven patients received BuCy conditioning and 2 patients underwent reduced intensity conditioning SCT. Seventy-two percent of patients had a matched sibling donor. With a median follow-up of 63.5 months in survivors, the 5-year overall survival is 79.1% (95% confidence interval 66.3%-94.4%). TRM was 15.4%, with an additional case of mortality from breast cancer. These results demonstrate that in selected younger patients, a fully myeloablative allo-SCT utilizing BuCy conditioning provides excellent OS and disease control with low TRM.     

Autologous Stem Cell Transplant for Immunoglobulin Light Chain Amyloidosis Patients Aged 70 to 75

Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) has been used in treatment for immunoglobulin light chain (AL) amyloidosis for over 2 decades and is generally reserved for patients younger than 70 years. Herein we report on outcomes of ASCT in a cohort of patients with AL amyloidosis aged 70 years or older. Between August of 2002 and April of 2017, 34 patients aged 70 years or older, with biopsy-proven AL amyloidosis, received an ASCT at the Mayo Clinic Rochester. Seventy percent of patients (n?=?24) were transplanted within 6 months of diagnosis, and 74% (n?=?25) received reduced-intensity conditioning with melphalan <200 mg/m². Sixty-five percent of patients (n?=?22) required hospitalization with a median duration of hospital admission of 8 days. Common reasons for hospitalization included fever or infection (14%), cardiac arrhythmia (14%), nutritional support (24%), and volume overload (19%). Overall response rate was 75%, with a complete response seen in 25% of patients. Overall survival and progression-free survival for the cohort were 66 months and 40 months, respectively. One patient died within 100 days of transplant, representing a 3% 100-day mortality rate. ASCT is safe and efficacious in carefully screened patients aged 70 or above.     

Tandem Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation Improves Outcomes in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma with Extramedullary Disease and High-Risk Cytogenetics: A Study from the Chronic Malignancies Working Party of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation

Although high-dose therapy and autologous stem cell transplant combined with novel agents continues to be the hallmark of first-line treatment in newly diagnosed transplant-eligible multiple myeloma patients, the impact of tandem autologous or autologous/reduced-intensity allogeneic transplant for patients with extramedullary disease (EMD) and high-risk cytogenetics is not yet defined. Here, we analyzed clinical and cytogenetic data from 488 adult myeloma patients with EMD undergoing single autologous (n = 373), tandem autologous (n = 84), or autologous–allogeneic transplant (n = 31) between 2003 and 2015. At least 1 high-risk abnormality was present in 41% (n = 202), with del(17p) (40%) and t(4;14) (45%) the most frequent. More than 1 high-risk abnormality was found in 54%. High-risk cytogenetics showed worse 4-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) of 54% and 29%, respectively, versus 78% and 49% for standard-risk cytogenetics (P < .001). Co-segregation of high-risk abnormalities did not seem to affect outcome. Regarding transplant regimen, OS and PFS were 70% and 43% for single autologous versus 83% and 52% for tandem autologous and 88% and 58% for autologous–allogeneic (P = .06 and P = .30). In multivariate analysis high-risk cytogenetics were associated with worse survival (hazard ratio [HR], 2.00; P = .003), whereas tandem autologous significantly improved outcome versus single autologous transplant (HRs, .46 and .64; P = .02 and P = .03). Autologous–allogeneic transplant did not significantly differ in outcome but appeared to improve survival, but results were limited because of small population (HR, .31). In conclusion, high-risk cytogenetics is frequently observed in newly diagnosed myeloma with EMD and significantly worsens outcome after single autologous, whereas a tandem autologous transplant strategy may overcome onset poor prognosis.