The histopathology of lung allograft dysfunction associated with the development of donor-specific HLA alloantibodies

The histopathology of antibody-mediated rejection in lung allografts, outside of classical hyperacute rejection, has been poorly defined, in part because of the difficulty in identifying potential alloantibodies and in separating alloreactive and nonspecific complement-mediated reactions. In this study, we looked at lung biopsies coinciding with the development of anti-human leukocyte antigen (anti-HLA) antibodies and lung dysfunction in a diverse group of lung transplant recipients over a 3-year period. We identified 23 patients and found that 17 had coexistent high-grade acute cellular rejection, 5 had patchy acute lung injury, and 1 had bronchiolitis at the time that anti-HLA alloantibodies appeared. Capillaritis was seen in 4/22 (18%) cases, usually in the context of cellular rejection. When the 17 cases of acute cellular rejection with coexistent anti-HLA antibodies were compared with a matched group of 26 patients with equivalent cellular rejection grade without anti-HLA antibodies, the only morphologic feature that separated the 2 groups was capillaritis seen in a minority of cases. C4d deposits were seen in both groups, although more frequently in those cases with anti-HLA antibodies (76% vs. 24%). The development of anti-HLA alloantibodies often occurs in the setting of acute cellular rejection, which in only a minority of cases can be identified as likely having an antibody-mediated component. C4d staining does not consistently separate the 2 groups. Identifying and ascribing allograft dysfunction to antibody-mediated rejection related to the development of anti-HLA antibodies is a difficult task that cannot be solved exclusively by morphology and requires significant clinicopathologic correlation.     

Vimentin antibodies: a non-HLA antibody as a potential risk factor in renal transplantation

Chronic allograft rejection is the major problem encountered in solid organ transplantation and is the end point of several complex processes. A number of recent studies show both alloimmune and autoimmune responses may have roles to play. The importance of HLA antibodies in transplantation is well documented, but despite the introduction of very sensitive HLA screening assays, antibody-mediated allograft rejection still occurs without detectable HLA antibodies. The target for antibody-mediated allograft rejection in these circumstances remains elusive, perhaps due to the variety of potential targets presented on endothelial cells. Recent studies identifying C4d and immunoglobulin deposits in patients undergoing late allograft loss provide evidence that chronic rejection involves humoral as well as cellular components. Several endothelial cell antigens that might be important in chronic rejection have been suggested, including MHC class I chain-related genes; Lewis; and the intermediate filament protein, vimentin. Vimentin is an ideal candidate antigen for antibody-mediated rejection as it is found in endothelial cells and is exposed to the immune system following surgery or by chronic allograft rejection due to endothelial cell breakdown, where the development of antibodies may cause further damage. We have developed a flow cytometric assay for the detection of antibodies to vimentin and have investigated whether HLA or vimentin antibodies are present in renal transplant recipients undergoing chronic rejection.     

Overcoming immunologic incompatibility: transplanting the difficult to transplant patient

Immunologic incompatibilities between donor and recipient have limited the access to renal transplantation for many patients. Previously the presence of donor-specific alloantibodies directed against donor major histocompatibility complex (MHC) antigens or natural antibodies directed against donor ABO blood group antigens was considered an absolute contraindication to renal transplantation. However, with the current understanding of humoral immune responses, superior immunosuppressive agents, and improved diagnosis and treatment of antibody-mediated rejection, renal transplantation can be safely performed with outstanding results despite the presence of donor-specific antibody. In this review we discuss the biology of antibody-mediated rejection and sensitization. We discuss the diagnostic tests necessary to characterize the type, affinity, and avidity of the donor-directed antibodies. Current methods for performing renal transplants across ABO and human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-sensitized barriers are covered, including the potential morbidities. The rest of the review focuses on advances in managing these antibodies to increase the likelihood of receiving a deceased donor kidney or allow transplantation from a living donor against whom one has a prohibitive antibody.     

A case of allograft dysfunction with antibody-mediated rejection developing 13 yr after kidney transplantation

Abstract:  Antibody-mediated rejection is an important cause of chronic allograft dysfunction. We report a case of chronic antibody-mediated rejection 13 yr after transplantation. This patient is a 19-yr-old man who had renal insufficiency since infancy because of bilateral polycystic kidneys. Peritoneal dialysis was started when he was four yr old and he received a renal allograft from his mother at the age of six yr. Donor and recipient were ABO compatible and immunosuppressive treatment was started with cyclosporine, mizoribine, and methylprednisolone. No acute rejection was experienced and histological acute rejection was not proven on any subsequent protocol biopsies. Ten yr after transplantation, a protocol biopsy revealed moderate chronic allograft nephropathy and severe cyclosporine-associated arteriolopathy. His allograft function was preserved at this time and the cyclosporine dose was tapered to 125 mg/d. His renal function gradually deteriorated starting 12 yr after transplantation. Although mizoribine was changed to mycophenolate mofetil, he required dialysis one yr later. A diagnosis of antibody-mediated rejection was made based upon the renal biopsy findings (including C4d staining) and circulating anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibody levels (12 yr after transplantation). We conclude that it is necessary to pay attention to antibody-mediated rejection, even in allograft cases with good function for over 10 yr and no risk factors for the development of de novo anti-HLA antibodies.     

Platelets in Early Antibody-Mediated Rejection of Renal Transplants

Antibody-mediated rejection is a major complication in renal transplantation. The pathologic manifestations of acute antibody-mediated rejection that has progressed to functional impairment of a renal transplant have been defined in clinical biopsy specimens. However, the initial stages of the process are difficult to resolve with the unavoidable variables of clinical studies. We devised a model of renal transplantation to elucidate the initial stages of humoral rejection. Kidneys were orthotopically allografted to immunodeficient mice. After perioperative inflammation subsided, donor-specific alloantibodies were passively transferred to the recipient. Within 1 hour after a single transfer of antibodies, C4d was deposited diffusely on capillaries, and von Willebrand factor released from endothelial cells coated intravascular platelet aggregates. Platelet-transported inflammatory mediators platelet factor 4 and serotonin accumulated in the graft at 100- to 1000-fold higher concentrations compared with other platelet-transported chemokines. Activated platelets that expressed P-selectin attached to vascular endothelium and macrophages. These intragraft inflammatory changes were accompanied by evidence of acute endothelial injury. Repeated transfers of alloantibodies over 1 week sustained high levels of platelet factor 4 and serotonin. Platelet depletion decreased platelet mediators and altered the accumulation of macrophages. These data indicate that platelets augment early inflammation in response to donor-specific antibodies and that platelet-derived mediators may be markers of evolving alloantibody responses.     

Accommodation: does it apply to human leukocyte antigens?

The term "accommodation" was invoked to describe endothelial cell resistance to antibody-mediated rejection after ABO-incompatible kidney or experimental xenograft transplantation. Currently, there is much interest in how to achieve successful human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-incompatible allograft transplantation in HLA-sensitized patients and how to treat antibody-mediated rejection after ABO-compatible HLA-incompatible allotransplantation. The term "accommodation" is often used interchangeably to describe patients who have donor-specific ABO or HLA alloantibodies in the absence of damage to their allograft. Here, we suggest that there are important differences between the immune responses to protein versus carbohydrate antigens and that graft HLA molecules may respond differently to antibodies (and antibody isotypes) than ABO antigens. Neither the mechanisms nor a phenotype of accommodation have been defined fully. Further research is needed to define mechanisms of both resistance and susceptibility to antibody-mediated injury and to predict under which circumstances allograft accommodation may occur.     

Post-transplantation anti-HLA antibodies: which relevance?

Anti-HLA antibodies formed de novo post-transplantation are involved in the development of acute humoral rejection also known as antibody-mediated rejection. This form of rejection is characterized by histological lesions, a positive C4d-staining of peritubular capillaries and anti-donor antibodies. The presence of anti-HLA antibodies indicates a poor prognosis as it is associated with a highly significant increase of graft loss risk, which might depend on antibody concentration. To prevent acute humoral rejection, antibodies must be systematically detected 3 months after transplantation with sensitive methods using recombinant HLA antigens that allow detecting anti-HLA antibodies by ELISA, flow cytometric panel-reactive antibodies test or immunobead flow cytometric assay, the intensity of fluorescence determining the concentration of anti-HLA antibodies. In case of acute graft dysfunction, antibody-mediated rejection must be treated by a combination of immunosuppressive drugs, antibodies, intra-venous immunoglobulins and/or plasmaphereses.     

Clinical Significance of MHC-Reactive Alloantibodies that Develop after Kidney or Kidney–pancreas Transplantation

The purpose of this study was to determine the relationships between acute rejection, anti-major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I and/or class II-reactive alloantibody production, and chronic rejection of renal allografts following kidney or simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation. Sera from 277 recipients were obtained pretransplant and between 1 month and 9.5 years post-transplant (mean 2.6years). The presence of anti-MHC class I and class II alloantibodies was determined by flow cytometry using beads coated with purified MHC molecules. Eighteen percent of recipients had MHC-reactive alloantibodies detected only after transplantation by this method. The majority of these patients produced alloantibodies directed at MHC class II only (68%). The incidence of anti-MHC class II, but not anti-MHC class I, alloantibodies detected post-transplant increased as the number of previous acute rejection episodes increased (p = 0.03). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that detection of MHC class II-reactive, but not MHC class I-reactive, alloantibodies post-transplant was a significant risk factor for chronic allograft rejection, independent of acute allograft rejection. We conclude that post-transplant detectable MHC class II-reactive alloantibodies and previous acute rejection episodes are independent risk factors for chronic allograft rejection. Implementing new therapeutic strategies to curtail post-transplant alloantibody production, and avoidance of acute rejection episodes, may improve long-term graft survival by reducing the incidence of chronic allograft rejection.     

Treatment of humoral rejection in kidney transplantation

Acute antibody-mediated rejection (acute humoral rejection [AHR]) of organ allografts presents most of the time as severe dysfunction with a high risk of allograft loss. Peritubular capillary complement C4d deposition is diagnostic of AHR in kidney allografts and is associated with circulating donor-specific anti-HLA alloantibodies. Removal of alloantibodies with suppression of antibody production and rejection reversal is now possible. Therapeutic strategies that include combinations of plasmapheresis (or immunoadsorption), mycophenolate mofetil, tacrolimus, and/or intravenous immunoglobulins have been used to successfully treat AHR. The optimal protocol to treat humoral rejection remains to be defined. Anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody therapy (rituximab) aiming at depleting B cells and suppressing antibody production has been used as a rescue therapy in some episodes of refractory humoral rejection. Plasmapheresis and/or intravenous polyclonal immunoglobulin, as well as rituximab, have also been used to successfully “desensitize” selected high-immunologic risk patients who were in anticipation of crossmatch-positive (or ABO-incompatible) kidney transplantation. Recent data suggest that chronic kidney allograft rejection might also be monitored by complement C4d in biopsies. The efficacy and safety of immunosuppressive drugs such as tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil (or enteric-coated mycophenolic acid), sirolimus, or everolimus in controlling antidonor humoral responses in patients with chronic allograft dysfunction remains to be studied prospectively. The combination of tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil appears to effectively suppress antidonor antibody production. In the near future, the possible role of specific anti–B-cell approaches with drugs, such as rituximab, or possibly of new anti–T-cell activation approaches using selective agents such as belatacept should be assessed to refine the management of chronic allograft dysfunction.     

Four Stages and Lack of Stable Accommodation in Chronic Alloantibody-Mediated Renal Allograft Rejection in Cynomolgus Monkeys

The etiology of immunologically mediated chronic renal allograft failure is unclear. One cause is thought to be alloantibodies. Previously in Cynomolgus monkeys, we observed a relationship among donor-specific alloantibodies (DSA), C4d staining, allograft glomerulopathy, allograft arteriopathy and progressive renal failure. To define the natural history of chronic antibody-mediated rejection and its effect on renal allograft survival, we now extend this report to include 417 specimens from 143 Cynomolgus monkeys with renal allografts. A subset of animals with long-term renal allografts made DSA (48%), were C4d positive (29%), developed transplant glomerulopathy (TG) (22%) and chronic allograft arteriopathy (CAA) (19%). These four features were highly correlated and associated with statistically significant shortened allograft survival. Acute cellular rejection, either Banff type 1 or 2, did not correlate with alloantibodies, C4d deposition or TG. However, endarteritis (Banff type 2) correlated with later CAA. Sequential analysis identified four progressive stages of chronic antibody-mediated rejection: (1) DSA, (2) deposition of C4d, (3) TG and (4) rising creatinine/renal failure. These new findings provide strong evidence that chronic antibody-mediated rejection develops without enduring stable accommodation, progresses through four defined clinical pathological stages and shortens renal allograft survival.     

Relationship of B cell alloantibodies to renal allograft survival.

To define the relationship of donor-specific B lymphocyte alloantibodies to renal allograft survival, longitudinal serum samples obtained pre- and post-transplantation were examined for antibodies cytotoxic to donor B lymphocytes. Ten of 17 renal allograft recipients had antibodies to donor B lymphocytes but not T lymphocytes either pre- and/or post-transplantation. Three patients underwent successful transplants despite preformed B cell antibodies; however, seven who developed B cell antibodies only after transplantation are either undergoing chronic rejection (4) or have had severe rejection crisis (3). Seven patients with no B cell antibodies have functioning grafts. In all cases, B cell antibodies were detected before biochemical and clinical evidence of rejection. Similar findings were noted when sera of 38 renal transplant recipients were examined for B cell antibodies cytotoxic to an unrelated panel of B lymphocytes. These results demonstrate that the development of B cell alloantibodies after transplantation is often associated with rejection and that successful renal transplantation can be performed across a positive B cell crossmatch.     

A personal perspective: 100-year history of the humoral theory of transplantation

The humoral theory states that antibodies cause the rejection of allografts. From 1917 to 1929, extensive efforts were made to produce antibodies against tumors. It was finally realized that the antibodies were produced against the transplant antigens present on transplantable tumors, not against the tumor-specific antigens. To get around this problem, inbred mouse strains were developed, leading to identification of the transplant antigens determined by the H-2 locus of mice. The antibodies were hemagglutinating and cytotoxic antibodies. The analogous human leukocyte antigen system was established by analysis of lymphocytotoxic alloantibodies that were made by pregnant women, directed against mismatched antigens of the fetus. The human leukocyte antigen antibodies were then found to cause hyperacute rejection, acute rejection, and chronic rejection of kidneys. Antibodies appeared in almost all patients after rejection of kidneys. With Luminex single antigen bead technology, donor-specific antibodies could be identified before rise in serum creatinine and graft failure. Antibodies were shown to be predictive of subsequent graft failure in kidney, heart, and lung transplants: patients without antibodies had superior 4-year graft survival compared with those who did have antibodies. New evidence that antibodies are also associated with chronic failure has appeared for liver and islet transplants. Four studies have now shown that removal or reduction of antibodies result in higher graft survival. If removal of antibodies prevents chronic graft failure, final validation of the humoral theory can be achieved.     

Late Acute Kidney Transplant Rejection: Clinicopathological Correlates and Response to Corticosteroid Therapy

Acute rejection is a major cause of kidney allograft dysfunction. It is important to distinguish between cellular and antibody-mediated rejection to guide the treatment strategy. The management of acute antibody-mediated rejection includes aggressive therapy with plasmapheresis and intravenous immunoglobulin. C4d staining of peritubular capillaries has emerged as a valuable tool in identifying antibody-mediated rejection. Late acute rejection has a worse prognosis than early acute rejection. The clinical and pathological features of late acute kidney allograft rejection are not fully understood. We studied the clinicopathological correlates of late acute rejection in our patient population. During an 8-year period, all patients who had late acute rejection (6 months posttransplant) were identified. Patients with severe chronic changes and transplant glomerulopathy were excluded. Patients were divided into C4d− and C4d− groups. Histopathological features and treatment response were evaluated. Nine patients met inclusion criteria (4 C4d+, 5 C4d−). Maintenance therapy consisted of mycophenolate mofetil, calcineurin inhibitors, and low-dose prednisone. All patients received intravenous methlyprednisolone or high-dose oral prednisone as antirejection therapy. Seventy-five percent of patients in the C4d+ group and 80% of patients in the C4d− group had a clinical response to antirejection therapy. The majority of C4d+ patients with late acute rejection who were treated with corticosteroids alone responded to treatment. The study raises the possibility that a subset of C4d+ patients with acute rejection who do not have severe chronic changes might respond to corticosteroid therapy alone.     

C4D deposition and positive posttransplant crossmatch are not necessarily markers of antibody-mediated rejection in renal allograft recipients

The aim of the study was to search for serologic, immunopathologic, and morphologic evidence of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) among patients with acute renal allograft dysfunction. The study included 19 patients with episodes of acute rejection (ARE) within the first year after transplantation. All patients had negative crossmatch tests before transplantation. Patients underwent biopsy for histologic and C4d examinations. All patients were monitored for donor-specific HLA alloantibodies during the first posttransplant year. Complement-dependent cytotoxic crossmatches were performed with donor lymphocytes. In eight patients, the crossmatch test results changed to positive during ARE. In all biopsies except one with cortical infarction, we observed C4d staining (group 1). The biopsies of four patients showed histologic changes of AMR, and all of their grafts were lost. In one patient, cellular and vascular rejection (Banff II) were present; in two, Banff I; and in one, borderline lesions. These results were compared with 11 patients with ARE but negative posttransplant crossmatches and negative staining for C4d (group 2). The histologic findings in the biopsies of these patients were cellular interstitial and vascular rejection (Banff I and Banff II). With no features suggestive of AMR. During the first year after transplantation, the creatinine levels of group 1 patients, were significantly higher than group 2 patients. One-year graft survival was 50% in group 1 and 91% in group 2. CONCLUSIONS: C4d and a positive posttransplant crossmatch were not associated with histologic features of AMR in half of the ARE. Nevertheless, C4d deposition and positive posttransplant crossmatches correlated with allograft injury among renal transplant patients.     

Antibody-mediated rejection: treatment alternatives and outcomes

Over the past 10 years, thanks to the development of sensitive methods of antibody detection and markers of antibody injury such as C4d staining, the role of anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) and non-HLA alloantibodies as effectors of acute and chronic immune allograft injury has been revisited.Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) defines all allograft rejection caused by antibodies directed against donor-specific HLA molecules, blood group antigen (ABO)-isoagglutinins, or endothelial cell antigens. Antibody-mediated rejection can be a recalcitrant process, resistant to therapy and carries an ominous prognosis to the graft.In concordance with these views, treatment protocols for AMR use permutations of a multiple-prong approach that include (1) the suppression of the T-cell dependent antibody response, (2) the removal of donor reactive antibody, (3) the blockade of the residual alloantibody, and (4) the depletion of naive and memory B-cells. Although all published protocols report a variable rate of success, a major weakness of all current protocols is the lack of effective anti-plasma cell agents.In comparison to acute AMR, the treatment for chronic AMR (CAMR) is not well characterized. Although in acute AMR large titers of pre-existent alloantibodies result in massive activation of the complement system and lytic injury of the graft endothelium, thereby requiring aggressive and fast removal of the offending agents, in CAMR, complement activation results in sublytic endothelial cell injury and activation. Although this type of injury results in chronic graft failure, its slow progression likely renders it amenable of suppression by heightening of maintenance immunosuppression and anti-idiotypic blockade of the circulating alloantibody without the need of plasma exchange. In this review, we will discuss the rationale behind the design of treatment protocols for acute AMR and CAMR as well as their reported results and complications.     

Significance of donor-specific antibodies in acute rejection

Significant advances in recent years in the diagnosis of antibody-mediated graft rejection have led to the re-evaluation of humoral alloreactivity in organ transplantation. By introducing the "C4d-test" into the work-up of transplant biopsies, donor-specific antibodies were claimed to be directly involved in about 30% of acute rejection episodes. The diagnostic criteria for antibody-mediated rejections of renal grafts are now incorporated in the "Banff classification" as refined at a recent consensus conference. Capillary C4d is not always concordant with circulating anti-HLA-antibodies, even if these are assayed with improved techniques. Antibody absorption within the graft and antigens other than HLA, therefore, have to be considered. Effective therapy of humoral rejection is now available. Serial assessment of humoral alloreactivity also in the posttransplantation period is now mandatory to identify at-risk patients.     

Emerging role of B cells in chronic allograft dysfunction

B cells have many possible mechanisms by which they can affect allograft survival, including antigen presentation, cytokine production, immune regulation, and differentiation into alloantibody-producing plasma cells. This report reviews the last mechanism, which the authors regard as most critical for the long-term survival of allografts, namely, the promotion of chronic rejection by alloantibodies. Chronic humoral rejection characteristically arises late after transplantation and causes transplant glomerulopathy, multilamination of peritubular capillary basement membranes, and C4d deposition in PTCs and glomeruli. Circulating antidonor human leukocyte antigen class II antibodies are commonly detected and may precede the development of graft injury. Prognosis is poor, especially when recognized after graft dysfunction has developed. Improved detection and treatment are critically needed for this common cause of late graft loss.     

Anti-human leukocyte antigen antibodies, vascular C4d deposition and increased soluble c4d in broncho-alveolar lavage of lung allografts

BACKGROUND: The hallmark of humoral rejection is the presence of subendothelial C4d in the allograft. A simultaneous determination of vascular C4d with soluble C4d in broncho-alveolar lavage fluid (BAL) and circulating anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies (HLA-Ab) has not been reported in lung transplantation. METHODS: Forty-two consecutive lung-transplant patients were included in this cross-sectional study. The presence and specificity of HLA-Ab was determined at the same frequency with transbronchial biopsies. Soluble C4d levels were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in all 42 patients. In a subgroup of 32 patients with available timely matched paraffin-embedded tissue sections, the vascular C4d deposition was also assessed. RESULTS: The presence of HLA-Ab in 16 patients was associated with biopsy-proven acute rejection (10/16 vs. 3/16, P<0.01) and increased immunosuppression (13/16 vs. 4/16, P<0.005). Pulmonary function was also decreased in patients with HLA-Ab (mean forced expiratory volume in 1 second=49%) when compared with the control group (mean forced expiratory volume in 1 second=66%, P<0.05). Nine patients exhibited specific vascular C4d deposition and in eight of nine (89%) cases HLA-Ab were detected, versus 8 of 23 (35%) in C4d-negative patients (P<0.05). Soluble C4d in BAL was highly (>0.5 microg/mL) elevated in patients with HLA-Ab and vascular C4d and was moderately (0.2 microg/mL) increased in patients with antibodies but C4d-negative. In contrast, only a slight elevation of soluble C4d (<0.1 microg/mL) was detected in patients without HLA-specific antibodies. CONCLUSIONS: The association of HLA-specific antibodies with vascular C4d deposition and soluble C4d in BAL, in addition to the reduced pulmonary function, might constitute a diagnostic triad for antibody-mediated rejection in lung transplant patients.     

Evidence That Humoral Allograft Rejection in Lung Transplant Patients Is Not Histocompatibility Antigen-Related

We have recently recognized humoral rejection (HR) in lung allograft recipients and its association with acute and chronic graft dysfunction. We have shown that C4d, a stable marker of classic complement activation, is deposited in lung allografts, correlating with clinical rejection and parenchymal injury. The antigenic target may be endothelium in the setting of recurrent acute rejection while varying components of the bronchial wall may be important in chronic graft dysfunction. We sought to establish whether there is a role for antibodies with histocompatibility antigen specificity in the lung humoral allograft phenomenon. Flow cytometric and ELISA assays to assess donor-specific antigens were conducted on sera from 25 lung transplant recipients who had experienced one or more episodes of clinical rejection; in addition, the serum samples were tested for evidence of antiendothelial cell antibody activity. Morphologically, each case had biopsies showing septal capillary injury with significant deposits of immunoreactants with microvascular localization and positive indirect immunofluorescent antiendothelial cell antibody assay. Panel-reactive antibody testing showed absence of MHC Class I/II alloantibodies; ELISA based crossmatch detecting donor-specific MHC Class I/II specific antibodies was negative. HR can occur in the absence of antibodies with HLA specificity; antigenic targets may be of endothelial cell origin.