Do Conversion Total Hip Arthroplasty Yield Comparable Results to Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty?

Background

The incidence of hip fractures is growing with the increasing elderly population. Typically, hip fractures are treated with open reduction internal fixation, hemiarthroplasty, or total hip arthroplasty (THA). Failed hip fracture fixation is often salvaged by conversion THA. The total number of conversion THA procedures is also supplemented by its use in treating different failed surgical hip treatments such as acetabular fracture fixation, Perthes disease, slipped capital femoral epiphysis, and developmental dysplasia of the hip. As the incidence of conversion THA rises, it is important to understand the perioperative characteristics of conversion THA. Some studies have demonstrated higher complication rates in conversion THAs than primary THAs, but research distinguishing the 2 groups is still limited.

Is Outpatient Total Hip Arthroplasty Safe?

Background

Safety data for outpatient total hip arthroplasty (THA) remains scarce.

Is Routine Mid-term Total Hip Arthroplasty Surveillance Beneficial?

Background  

Routine followup of patients after primary or revision THA is commonly practiced and driven by concerns that delays in identifying early failure will result in more complicated or more costly surgical interventions. Although mid-term followup (4–10 years) has been performed to follow cohorts of patients, the benefit of observing individual patients regardless of symptoms has not been established.     

Total Hip Arthroplasty: Is Small Incision Better?

Outcome data are eagerly awaited at present time to evaluate the role of minimally invasive surgery in orthopedic surgery. This matched-pair study reports the outcome of total hip arthroplasty (THA) performed through regular or small incision technique by a single surgeon. There were 120 patients in this cohort with a mean age of 66.8 years (range, 39-90 years). There was no detectable difference in outcome between the two groups with regard to blood loss, analgesia requirement, functional recovery, length of hospital stay, or disposition at discharge. One patient in the small incision group with undersized femoral component required revision of the femoral stem 8 months later. The recent extensive interest for minimally invasive THA has been attributed to market-driven and patient-driven demand for this procedure. We were not able to detect any difference in outcome parameters for THA performed through small incision compared with the conventional techniques.     

Are Routine Postoperative Laboratory Tests Necessary After Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty?

BackgroundRecently, the practice of ordering routine postoperative laboratory tests in primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) has been challenged. This study aimed to evaluate the utility of routine postoperative laboratory tests after primary elective THA in an Asian population and identify the risk factors associated with abnormal postoperative laboratory test–related intervention.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed 395 consecutive patients who underwent primary elective THA at a single tertiary academic center. Patient clinical information and laboratory test results were collected for analysis.ResultsA total of 349 (88.4%) patients had abnormal postoperative laboratory test results; most patients had anemia and hypoalbuminemia. Twenty-seven (6.8%) patients received clinical intervention. Of the 307 (77.7%) patients with postoperative anemia, 7 patients received blood transfusion. Factors associated with transfusion were female gender, low body mass index, long operation time, and low preoperative hemoglobin levels. Of the 149 (37.7%) patients with postoperative hypoalbuminemia, 16 received albumin supplementation. Factors associated with albumin supplementation were female gender, long operation time, and low preoperative albumin levels. Although 36 patients had abnormal postoperative creatinine, only 1 patient required specialist consultation. For electrolyte abnormalities, hyponatremia was noted; however, no patient received sodium supplementation. Moreover, 14 patients developed hypokalemia, of which 6 required potassium supplementation; 163 patients had hypocalcemia, of which 2 received calcium supplementation.ConclusionRoutine laboratory tests after primary elective THA are unnecessary for most of the patients in modern clinical practice. However, for those with identified risk factors, postoperative laboratory tests still should be performed.     

Does Prior Bariatric Surgery Affect Implant Survivorship and Complications Following Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty/Total Knee Arthroplasty?

Background

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of prior bariatric surgery on survivorship, outcome, and complications following primary total hip arthroplasty (THA)/total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

Does Acetabular Retroversion Affect Range of Motion after Total Hip Arthroplasty?

Background  

Increasingly, acetabular retroversion is recognized in patients undergoing hip arthroplasty. Although prosthetic component positioning is not determined solely by native acetabular anatomy, acetabular retroversion presents a dilemma for component positioning if the surgeon implants the device in the anatomic position.     

Is There an Association Between Negative Patient-Experience Comments and Perioperative Outcomes After Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty?

BackgroundMultiple stakeholders are interested in improving patient experience after primary total hip arthroplasty due to shifts toward patient-centered care. Patient free-text narratives are a potentially valuable but largely unexplored source of data.MethodsThe records of 383 patients who underwent primary total hip arthroplasty between August 2016 and August 2019 were combined with vendor-supplied patient satisfaction data, which included patient free-text comments and the Press Ganey satisfaction survey. A total of 1295 patient comments were analyzed for sentiment, and negative comments were categorized into nine themes. Postoperative outcomes, patient-reported outcome measures, and traditional measures of satisfaction were compared between patients who provided a negative comment vs those who did not. Multivariable regression was used to determine perioperative variables associated with providing a negative comment.ResultsOf the 1295 patient comments: 54% were positive, 24% were negative, 10% were mixed, and 12% were neutral. Top two themes of negative comments were room condition (25%) and inefficient communication (23%). There were no differences in studied outcomes (eg. peak pain intensity, length of stay, or improvements in hip injury and osteoarthritis outcome scores Jr. and pain visual analog scale scores at 6-week follow-up) between those who provided negative comments vs those who did not (P > .05). However, patients who made negative comments were less likely to recommend their hospital care to peers (P < .001). Finally, patients who had >2 allergies (P = .024) were more likely to provide negative comments.ConclusionThe present study demonstrates that patient satisfaction appears not to be a reliable sole proxy for traditional objective outcome measures of pain relief and functional improvement.     

Hip Osteonecrosis: Does Prior Hip Surgery Alter Outcomes Compared to an Initial Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty?

The purpose of this study was to assess the clinical and radiographic outcomes of total hip arthroplasty (THA) in patients who had osteonecrosis to see if prior hip preserving surgery affected outcomes. Implant survivorship, Harris hip scores, and radiographic outcomes were compared between 87 patients (92 hips) who had undergone prior hip preserving procedures and 105 patients (121 hips) who had only undergone THA. Patients were also sub-stratified into low- and high-risk groups for osteonecrosis. At a mean follow-up of 75 months, there were no significant differences in survivorship, clinical, and radiographic outcomes among the cohorts. Higher revision rates were associated with patients who were in the high-risk group. The authors believe that hip joint preserving procedures may not adversely affect the outcomes of later THA in patients with osteonecrosis.     

Is Limited Incision Better Than Standard Total Hip Arthroplasty? A Meta-analysis

Background

The literature comparing limited incision and standard incision THAs is confusing regarding whether limited incision THA improves short-term recovery without compromising long-term durability and survival. Further, previously published meta-analyses cannot conclude that limited incision THA is better. With new data, we seek to discover if the answers now exist.

Purpose

We used meta-analysis to compare surgical and hospitalization data, clinical outcomes, and complication rates, and thus (1) confirm whether limited incision THA is at least comparable to standard incision THA; and (2) determine whether limited incision THA is an improvement over standard incision THA.

Methods

The PubMed database was searched using the terms “minimally”, “invasive”, and “total hip”. Inclusion was limited to studies directly comparing limited incision with standard incision THA and reporting effect sizes.

Results

We identified 418 articles. Of these 11 provided background information and 30 provided data (3548 THAs) for the systematic review. Limited incision THA was better than standard incision THA in four measures: length of hospitalization (6 versus 7 days), VAS pain at discharge (2 versus 4), blood loss (421 mL versus 494 mL), and the Harris hip score at 3 months postoperation (90 versus 84). There were no outcomes for which standard incision was better. There was no major difference in the rate of complications.

Conclusions

Short-term recovery favors limited incision over standard incision THA. The lack of consistent reporting for surgical outcomes, clinical outcomes, and complications continues to create difficulties when comparing limited and standard incision THAs.     

Is the Internal Rotation Lag Sign a Sensitive Test for Detecting Hip Abductor Tendon Ruptures after Total Hip Arthroplasty?

Background

A slight increase in revisions for infected joint arthroplasties has been observed in the Nordic countries since 2000 for which the reasons are unclear. However, in 2007 a Swedish study of the timing for prophylactic antibiotics in a random sample of knee arthroplasties found that only 57% of the patients had received the antibiotic during the optimal time interval 45-15 minutes before surgery. The purpose of the report was to evaluate the effect of measures taken to improve the timing of prophylactic antibiotics.

Findings

Reporting this finding to surgeons at national meetings during 2008 the Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register (SKAR) introduced a new report form from January 2009 including the time for administration of preoperative antibiotics. Furthermore, the WHO's surgical checklist was introduced during 2009 and a national project was started to reduce infections in arthroplasty surgery (PRISS). The effect of these measures was found to be positive showing that in 2009, 69% of the 12,707 primary knee arthroplasties were reported to have received the prophylaxis within the 45-15 min time interval and 79% of the first 7,000 knee arthroplasties in 2010. A survey concerning the use of the WHO checklist at Swedish hospitals showed that 73 of 75 clinics had introduced a surgical checklist.

Conclusions

By registration and bringing back information to surgeons on the state of infection prophylaxis in combination with the introduction of the WHO checklist and the preventive work done by the PRISS project, the timing of preoperative prophylactic antibiotics in knee arthroplasty surgery was clearly improved.     

Does Age Influence Patient-Reported Outcomes in Unilateral Primary Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty?

BackgroundTotal hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are used to treat patients with end-stage arthritis. Previous studies have not demonstrated a consistent relationship between age and patient-reported outcomes. The purpose of this study is to assess the impact of age on patient-reported outcomes after unilateral primary THA or TKA.MethodsA retrospective review of available data in Alberta Bone and Joint Health Institute (ABJHI) Data Repository was performed. We identified 53,498 unilateral primary THA and TKA between April 2011 and 2017. Patients were divided by age into 3 categories: <55, 55-70, and >70. Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and EuroQoL 5-dimension (EQ-5D) Canada scores were obtained at presurgery, 3 and 12 months postoperatively.ResultsFor TKA, younger patients had larger improvements in WOMAC scores at 3 and 12 months (P = <.001-.033), and in EQ-5D scores at 3 months (P < .001). When adjusted, patients <55 had lower WOMAC and EQ-5D scores at 3 months postoperatively compared to those 55-70 or >70 (all P < .01). Outcomes at 12 months did not differ between age-groups.For THA, younger patients had larger improvements in WOMAC at 3 months (P = .03). When adjusted, patients <55 had higher WOMAC scores at 12 months postoperatively compared to those 55-70 or >70, and higher EQ-5D scores compared to those 55-70 (all P < .05).ConclusionWhile a multitude of factors go in to quantifying successful THA or TKA, this study suggests that patient age should not be a deterrent when considering the impact of age on patient-reported outcomes.     

Does Body Mass Index Affect The Early Outcome of Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty?

There is little evidence describing the influence of body mass index on the outcome of total hip arthroplasty (THA). Eight hundred patients undergoing primary cemented THA were followed for a minimum of 18 months. The Harris Hip Score (HHS) and Short Form 36 were recorded preoperatively and at 6 and 18 months postoperatively. In addition, other significant events were noted, namely death, dislocation, reoperation, superficial and deep infection, and blood loss. Multiple regression analysis was performed to identify whether body mass index (BMI) was an independently significant predictor of the outcome of THA. No relationship was seen between the BMI of an individual and the development of any of the complications noted. The HHS was seen to increase dramatically postoperatively in all patients. Body mass index did predict for a lower HHS at 6 and 18 months. This effect was small when compared with the overall improvements in these scores. There was no influence on the Short Form 36 component scores. On the basis of this study, we can find no justification for withholding THA solely on the grounds of BMI.     

Does Surgeon Volume Affect Outcomes Following Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty? A Systematic Review

Background

Surgeon volume has been identified as an important factor impacting postoperative outcome in patients undergoing orthopedic surgeries. With an absence of a detailed systematic review, we sought to collate evidence on the impact of surgeon volume on postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty.

Is Robotic-Assisted Technology Still Accurate in Total Hip Arthroplasty for Fibrous-Fused Hips?

BackgroundTotal hip arthroplasty (THA) for fibrous-fused hips is technically demanding. This study aimed to evaluate the precision and accuracy, as well as the rate of conversion of robotic-assisted THA in such difficult patients.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed 67 patients (84 hips) who underwent THA with fibrous-fused hips between August 2018 and June 2021 at our institution. Demographics, acetabular cup positioning, leg-length discrepancies, and postoperative Harris hip scores were recorded for all patients. Thirty-six patients (44 hips) who underwent robotic-assisted THA and 31 patients (40 hips) who underwent manual THA were enrolled in this study.ResultsThe robot accurately executed the preoperative plan, and there were no statistically significant differences between the preoperative planned anteversion, inclination, and postoperative measurements. In the robotic group, the percentage of acetabular cups in the safe zone was significantly higher than in the manual group (87.2 versus 55%, respectively, P = .042). The rate of conversion to manual THA for various reasons in the robotic-assisted THA group was 11.4% (5/44). Compared with manual THA, the mean increase in operative time for conversion from robotic-assisted to manual THA was 24 min (P < .001).ConclusionIn patients who have fibrous-fused hips, preoperative planning can be accurately executed by robotic-assisted technology. Compared with manual THA, robotic-assisted THA had a remarkable advantage in improving the frequency of achieving cup positioning within the target zone. Overall, robotic-assisted technology was helpful in such difficult cases, and the approximately 11.4% of cases converted to manual THA are reminders that surgeons should be thoroughly prepared preoperatively.     

Late Dislocations After Total Hip Arthroplasty: Is the Bearing a Factor?

Background

Dislocation is a leading cause of revision after primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). Although more common in the first few years after the procedure, dislocation can occur at any time. This study investigated the difference in late dislocation in ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC) bearings compared with metal-on-polyethylene and ceramic-on-polyethylene bearings in THA.

Does Balancing a Total Hip Arthroplasty Require a New Paradigm? Functional 3-Dimensional Balancing in Total Hip Arthroplasty

BackgroundTraditional principles for successful outcomes in Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) have relied largely on placing the socket in the native position and trying to restore static anatomical femoral parameters gauged on X-rays or intra-operative measurement. Stability is conventionally achieved by making appropriate changes during the time of trial reduction. Post-operative complications of dislocation and significant Limb Length Discrepancy (LLD) requiring foot wear modification represents opposite ends of the spectrum from a biomechanical perspective and these continue to be relatively high. A move towards giving more importance to functional dynamic parameters rather than static anatomical parameters and less reliance on stability testing at trial reduction is warranted.MethodsIntraoperative 3D functional balancing of THA without stability testing at trial reduction was practiced in all subjects undergoing THA in our unit from April 2014. To date 1019 patients have had their hips replaced with the same technique. They were followed up till April 2020 for post-operative complications of dislocation and significant LLD needing footwear modification. A secondary cohort of 114 patients from 1st January to December 31st 2017 within this primary group were analyzed clinically and radiologically to ascertain the implications of functional 3D balancing on X-ray parameters, clinical outcome scores (Harris Hip Score and Oxford Hip Score), ability to squat, and subtle subjective post-operative perception of limb lengthening (POPLL).ResultsIn the primary group of 1019 patients, there were only two dislocations and no patient needed footwear modification for LLD. In the detailed analysis of the secondary cohort of 114 patients, the correlation with restoration of static radiological parameters was inconsistent. 40 patients could not squat and 4 patients had subtle subjective post-operative perceived limb lengthening (POPLL). Measured outcomes such as HHS and OHS were improved in all patients with significant statistical significance (P < 0.001).ConclusionThis study underlines the fact that more importance must be given to functional dynamic parameters by 3D balancing of the THA and not on static anatomical X-rays parameters and stability testing during trial reduction. This represents a paradigm shift in the evolution of total hip arthroplasty.Level of EvidenceA Level II study. (Data collected from the ongoing prospective study) (http://www.spine.org/Documents/LevelsofEvidenceFinal.pdf).Supplementary InformationThe online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s43465-021-00505-3.     

When Should Complete Blood Count Tests Be Performed in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty Patients?

Background

Routine laboratory studies are often obtained following total hip arthroplasty (THA). Moreover, laboratory studies are often continued daily until the patient is discharged regardless of medical management. The purpose of this study was to investigate the use of routine complete blood count (CBC) tests following THA. Secondarily, the purpose was to identify patient factors associated with abnormal postoperative lab values.

Do Large Heads Enhance Stability and Restore Native Anatomy in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty?

Background  

Dislocation remains a serious complication in hip arthroplasty. Resurfacing proponents tout anatomic femoral head restoration as an advantage over total hip arthroplasty. However, advances in bearings have expanded prosthetic head options from traditional sizes of 22, 26, 28, and 32 mm to diameters as large as 60 mm. Large heads reportedly enhance stability owing to increased range of motion before impingement and increased jump distance to subluxation. Available larger diameter material combinations include metal- or ceramic-on-highly crosslinked polyethylene and metal-on-metal, each with distinct advantages and disadvantages.