Clinical performance of the LCx HCV RNA quantitative assay

This study was conducted to assess the performance of the Abbott laboratories LCx HCV RNA Quantitative Assay (LCx assay) in the clinical setting. Four clinical laboratories measured LCx assay precision, specificity, and linearity. In addition, a method comparison was conducted between the LCx assay and the Roche HCV Amplicor Monitor, version 2.0 (Roche Monitor 2.0) and the Bayer VERSANT HCV RNA 3.0 Assay (Bayer bDNA 3.0) quantitative assays. For precision, the observed LCx assay intra-assay standard deviation (S.D.) was 0.060-0.117 log IU/ml, the inter-assay S.D. was 0.083-0.133 log IU/ml, the inter-lot S.D. was 0.105-0.177 log IU/ml, the inter-site S.D. was 0.099-0.190 log IU/ml, and the total S.D. was 0.113-0.190 log IU/ml. The specificity of the LCx assay was 99.4% (542/545; 95% CI, 98.4-99.9%). For linearity, the mean pooled LCx assay results were linear (r=0.994) over the range of the panel (2.54-5.15 log IU/ml). A method comparison demonstrated a correlation coefficient of 0.881 between the LCx assay and Roche Monitor 2.0, 0.872 between the LCx assay and Bayer bDNA 3.0, and 0.870 between Roche Monitor 2.0 and Bayer bDNA 3.0. The mean LCx assay result was 0.04 log IU/ml (95% CI, -0.08, 0.01) lower than the mean Roche Monitor 2.0 result, but 0.57 log IU/ml (95% CI, 0.53, 0.61) higher than the mean Bayer bDNA 3.0 result. The mean Roche Monitor 2.0 result was 0.60 log IU/ml (95% CI, 0.56, 0.65) higher than the mean Bayer bDNA 3.0 result. The LCx assay quantitated genotypes 1-4 with statistical equivalency. The vast majority (98.9%, 278/281) of paired LCx assay-Roche Monitor 2.0 specimen results were within 1 log IU/ml. Similarly, 86.6% (240/277) of paired LCx assay and Bayer bDNA 3.0 specimen results were within 1 log, as were 85.6% (237/277) of paired Roche Monitor 2.0 and Bayer specimen results. These data demonstrate that the LCx assay may be used for quantitation of HCV RNA in HCV-infected individuals.     

Multicenter evaluation of the new Abbott RealTime assays for quantitative detection of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 and hepatitis C virus RNA

The analytical performances of the new Abbott RealTime hepatitis C virus (HCV) and human immunodeficiency virus type 1 viral load assays were compared at nine laboratories with different competitor assays. These included the Abbott LcX, Bayer Versant bDNA, Roche COBAS Amplicor, and Roche COBAS TaqMan assays. Two different protocols used during the testing period with and without a pre-m1000 RNA isolation spin were compared. The difference proved to be nonsignificant. A uracil-N-glycosylase (UNG) contamination control option in the HCV test for previous Roche COBAS Amplicor users was evaluated. It proved to decrease amplicon carryover by 100-fold independent of the amplicon input concentration. The protocol including UNG proved to overcome problems with false-positive negative controls. Comparison with other assays revealed only minor differences. The largest difference was observed between the Abbott HCV RealTime assay and the Roche COBAS Amplicor HCV Monitor version 2.0 assay.     

Verification of an assay for quantification of hepatitis C virus RNA by use of an analyte-specific reagent and two different extraction methods

Protocols were designed for quantification and detection of hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA by the use of an analyte-specific reagent (ASR) (Roche COBAS TaqMan48 [CTM48] HCV) after manual and automated RNA extraction. The purposes were to determine (i) assay performance characteristics using manual and automated RNA extraction methods, (ii) whether measurable range and limit of detection (LOD) of the ASR assay were influenced by genotype, and (iii) correlation of quantification by CTM48 HCV ASR and COBAS Monitor HCV v. 2.0. For HCV genotype 1 (Gt1), the lower limits of quantification after manual extraction were slightly lower than those for automated extraction (1.0 versus 1.5 log(10) IU/ml). Results were linear up to the highest concentration tested after extraction by both methods (manual, 6.1 log(10); automated, 6.4 log(10)). Similar results were obtained for Gt2 (1.8 to 6.8 log(10) IU/ml) and Gt3 (1.6 to 6.8 log(10) IU/ml) after automated extraction. The LOD of Gt1 virus was 10 IU/ml after manual extraction and between 25 and 37.5 IU/ml after automated extraction. Results with Gt2 and Gt3 viruses were similar after automated extraction (Gt2, between 25 and 50 IU/ml; Gt3, 25 IU/ml). Variability (intrarun and interrun, at concentrations throughout the range of quantification) was 相似文献   

Quantitation of HCV RNA with the microwell plate and COBAS Amplicor HCV Monitor assays.

BACKGROUND: We performed the Roche Amplicor Monitor hepatitis C virus (HCV) v2.0 microwell plate (MWP) assay for 2 years prior to bringing a COBAS instrument into the lab. Before reporting any results from the automated COBAS Amplicor Monitor HCV v2.0, we compared quantitative data with results on the same specimens from the manual Amplicor Monitor HCV. OBJECTIVE: To determine if the COBAS Amplicor Monitor assay yielded quantitative results that were comparable with those given by the manual Amplicor Monitor HCV. STUDY DESIGN: We tested 145 specimens with both assays. Specimens were chosen on the basis of having fallen within the linear range of the first assay. RESULTS: The log(10) mean (+/-standard deviation) for all 145 specimens was 5.976 (+/-0.597) for the COBAS and 6.142 (+/-0.597) for the MWP assay. When plotted as 145 pairs of numbers (log MWP result vs. log COBAS result), the linear regression line was displaced slightly downward from the line of equivalence by 0.1 log at the lower end and by 0.2 log at the upper end indicating the COBAS result was somewhat lower than the MWP result across the full range of the assay. The mean of the difference of the manual method and the COBAS for all 145 specimens was 0.166 log(10). A subset of 45 specimens for which we had HCV genotype data was analyzed separately. This set of specimens (of which 33 were genotype 1) also showed excellent concordance between the automated and manual methods. The two trendlines, one for genotype 1 and the other for genotypes 2, 3 and 4, were superimposable and thus the quantitative results were apparently not influenced by the genotypes, although the numbers were small (six HCV genotype 2, five HCV genotype 3 and one HCV genotype 4). CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that the automated Roche COBAS Amplicor Monitor v2.0 yields results that are comparable with the manual Amplicor Monitor assay for HCV genotype 1 and possibly also for genotypes 2, 3 and 4.     

Dynamic range of hepatitis C virus RNA quantification with the Cobas Ampliprep-Cobas Amplicor HCV Monitor v2.0 assay

Accurate quantification of hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA is needed in clinical practice to decide whether to continue or stop pegylated interferon-alpha-ribavirin combination therapy at week 12 of treatment for patients with chronic hepatitis C. Currently the HCV RNA quantification assay most widely used worldwide is the Amplicor HCV Monitor v2.0 assay (Roche Molecular Systems, Pleasanton, Calif.). The HCV RNA extraction step can be automated in the Cobas Ampliprep device. In this work, we show that the dynamic range of HCV RNA quantification of the Cobas Ampliprep/Cobas Amplicor HCV Monitor v2.0 procedure is 600 to 200,000 HCV RNA IU/ml (2.8 to 5.3 log IU/ml), which does not cover the full range of HCV RNA levels in infected patients. Any sample containing more than 200,000 IU/ml (5.3 log IU/ml) must thus be retested after dilution for accurate quantification. These results emphasize the need for commercial HCV RNA quantification assays with a broader range of linear quantification, such as real-time PCR-based assays.     

Real-time multiplex PCR assay to quantify hepatitis C virus RNA in peripheral blood mononuclear cells

Ultrasensitive methods to measure very low levels of hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA in biological samples may have diagnostic and prognostic significance and be useful to evaluate the response to antiviral treatment. A sensitive assay to quantify HCV RNA in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) was developed and validated using the iCycler iQ Detection System (Bio-Rad) coupled with TaqMan chemistry. HCV was co-amplified with the endogenous control glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase in a multiplex reaction. Calculated PCR amplification efficiencies for both target and control genes were used in a mathematical model for relative quantitation of HCV RNA. A linear relationship between input RNA and C(T) values over 6 log dilutions was observed for both HCV- and GAPDH-specific products (R(2) > or = 0.99). As few as 1.5 IU/reaction could be detected, with high accuracy (CV < or= 3.94%) and reproducibility (CV < or = 2.20%). Quantitation of HCV RNA levels ranging from 10(3) to 10(7) IU/ml as measured in 47 plasma samples was highly correlated with values obtained by the COBAS Amplicor HCV Monitor test, v2.0 (Roche) (R(2) = 0.977). In conclusion, this assay provides an excellent tool to determine accurately HCV kinetics in PBMCs during antiviral therapy and to assess the long-term significance of different patterns of response to treatment.     

Evaluation of the COBAS TaqMan HCV test with automated sample processing using the MagNA pure LC instrument

The COBAS TaqMan HCV Test (TaqMan HCV; Roche Molecular Systems Inc., Branchburg, N.J.) for hepatitis C virus (HCV) performed on the COBAS TaqMan 48 Analyzer (Roche Molecular Systems) currently relies on a manual sample processing method. Implementation of an automated sample processing method would facilitate the clinical use of this test. In this study, we evaluated the performance characteristics of TaqMan HCV following automated sample processing by the MagNA Pure LC instrument (MP; Roche Applied Science, Indianapolis, Ind.). The analytical sensitivity of TaqMan HCV following sample processing by MP was 8.1 IU/ml (95% confidence interval, 6.1 to 15.2). The assay showed good linearity (R(2) = 0.99) across a wide range of HCV RNA levels (25 to 5 x 10(6) IU/ml), with coefficients of variation ranging from 10% to 46%. Among 83 clinical specimens, the sensitivity and specificity of TaqMan HCV were 100% and 95%, respectively, when compared to the COBAS AMPLICOR hepatitis C virus test, version 2.0 (COBAS AMPLICOR; Roche Molecular Systems), with TaqMan HCV detecting two more HCV RNA-positive specimens than COBAS AMPLICOR. Both specimens were confirmed to be HCV RNA positive by the VERSANT HCV RNA qualitative test (Bayer HealthCare LLC, Tarrytown, N.Y.). There was also strong correlation (R(2) = 0.95) and good agreement between the results from TaqMan HCV and the VERSANT HCV RNA 3.0 assay (bDNA) (Bayer HealthCare LLC) among a group of 93 clinical specimens. The MP is a versatile, labor-saving sample processing platform suitable for reliable performance of TaqMan HCV.     

Evaluation of the Abbott RealTime HCV assay for quantitative detection of hepatitis C virus RNA.

BACKGROUND: The Abbott RealTime HCV assay for quantitative detection of HCV RNA has recently been introduced. OBJECTIVES: In this study, the performance of the Abbott RealTime HCV assay was evaluated and compared to the COBAS AmpliPrep/COBAS TaqMan HCV test. STUDY DESIGN: Accuracy, linearity, interassay and intra-assay variations were determined, and a total of 243 routine clinical samples were investigated. RESULTS: When accuracy of the new assay was tested, the majority of results were found to be within +/-0.5 log(10) unit of the results obtained by reference laboratories. Determination of linearity resulted in a quasilinear curve up to 1.0 x 10(6)IU/ml. The interassay variation ranged from 15% to 32%, and the intra-assay variation ranged from 5% to 8%. When clinical samples were tested by the Abbott RealTime HCV assay and the results were compared with those obtained by the COBAS AmpliPrep/COBAS TaqMan HCV test, the results for 93% of all samples with positive results by both tests were found to be within +/-1.0 log(10) unit. The viral loads for all patients measured by the Abbott and Roche assays showed a high correlation (R(2)=0.93); quantitative results obtained by the Abbott assay were found to be lower than those obtained by the Roche assay. CONCLUSIONS: The Abbott RealTime HCV assay proved to be suitable for use in the routine diagnostic laboratory. The time to results was similar for both of the assays.     

Evaluation of the MagNA pure LC instrument for extraction of hepatitis C virus RNA for the COBAS AMPLICOR Hepatitis C Virus Test,version 2.0

The COBAS AMPLICOR system has played a major role in the transition of molecular diagnostics from research to routine clinical laboratory use by automating the nucleic acid amplification and detection processes. However, sample preparation remains a labor-intensive portion of the procedure. In this study, we evaluated the performance of the COBAS AMPLICOR Hepatitis C Virus Test, version 2.0 (Roche Molecular Systems, Branchburg, N.J.) following manual hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA extraction versus automated extraction with the MagNA Pure LC instrument (Roche Applied Science, Indianapolis, Ind.). Parallel replicate testing was performed with standard dilutions of 100, 75, 60, and 0 HCV IU/ml and 153 clinical specimens. An analytical sensitivity of 75 IU/ml was achieved with either the manual or the standard-volume (200 microl) automated extraction methodologies (25 of 26 [96.2%]; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 80.4 to 99.9), whereas the clinical sensitivity and specificity were both 100% with either extraction method. A large-volume (1 ml) automated extraction method was also evaluated with standard dilutions of 40, 25, 10, and 0 IU/ml and the same 153 clinical specimens. The analytical sensitivity of the COBAS AMPLICOR assay with the large-volume extraction method was 25 HCV IU/ml (26 of 26 [100%]; 95% CI, 86.8 to 100), whereas the clinical sensitivity and specificity were both 100%. The MagNA Pure LC instrument is a versatile, labor-saving platform capable of integration with minimal modification of the existing assay procedure. The increased sensitivity of the COBAS AMPLICOR Hepatitis C Virus Test, version 2.0 performed in conjunction with large-volume HCV RNA extraction may be important in HCV diagnostic testing as new therapeutic strategies evolve.     

Assessment of early virological response to antiviral therapy by comparing four assays for HCV RNA quantitation using the international unit standard: implications for clinical management of patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection

WHO International Standards for nucleic acid tests are used widely to compare the different assays used in HCV RNA quantitation. The aim of the study was to assess the impact of the international unit standard for measuring HCV RNA in the management of patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. Twenty‐seven naïve patients infected chronically by HCV were treated with ribavirin plus PEG‐interferon‐alfa‐2b for 48 weeks. SVR was obtained for 16 patients (the other were non‐responders). For HCV RNA quantitation, four assays were undertaken: Versant HCV RNA 3.0 (Bayer), Real time PCR (TaqMan, Roche), LCx HCV RNA (Abbott), and Cobas Amplicor‐Monitor v2 (Roche). Considering a 2‐log decline at Week 12 after the beginning of therapy, discordant results were found with the four HCV RNA methods in predicting SVR or non‐response. At Week 4 and Week 12, significant differences were observed between Versant HCV RNA 3.0 versus PCR HCV Taqman, Versant HCV RNA 3.0 versus LCx HCV RNA, Cobas Monitor Amplicor HCV 2.0 versus LCx HCV RNA, and Cobas Monitor Amplicor HCV 2.0 versus PCR HCV Taqman (P < 0.001). The HCV RNA cutoff, given a 100% negative predictive value at Week 4 and Week 12, differed with the assays used to quantify HCV RNA, despite the use of the IU/ml units. Eighty‐nine percent of serum values for HCV RNA were concordant by the IU standard. All assays, however, failed to detect HCV RNA in some cases. Despite the use of the IU standard HCV‐infected patients might be monitored with only one assay. J. Med. Virol. 78:208–215, 2006. © 2005 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Quantification of hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA with a TaqMan HBV analyte-specific reagent following sample processing with the MagNA pure LC instrument

TaqMan hepatitis B virus (HBV) analyte-specific reagent (ASR; Roche Molecular Systems, Inc., Branchburg, NJ) is designed for the quantification of HBV DNA in serum or plasma. The performance characteristics of TaqMan HBV ASR following automated sample processing with the MagNA Pure LC instrument (MP; Roche Applied Science, Indianapolis, IN) were evaluated in this study. Analytical sensitivity and precision were assessed with commercially available HBV standards, while clinical serum specimens from HBsAg-seropositive patients and healthy blood donors were used to determine clinical sensitivity, specificity, and correlation with other commercially available assays. Analytical studies yielded a limit of detection of 2.4 IU/ml, with good linearity and correlation (R(2) = 0.9958) with expected HBV DNA titers over a wide range (6.0 x 10(0) to 2.1 x 10(8) IU/ml). Clinical sensitivity and specificity of the assay combined with automated sample processing were both 100%. Comparison of TaqMan HBV ASR and VERSANT HBV DNA 3.0 assay (bDNA; Bayer HealthCare LLC, Tarrytown, NY) results among clinical specimens yielded good correlation (R(2) = 0.9237), with a mean difference in titer of -0.213 log(10) IU/ml (95% confidence interval, -0.678 to 1.10 log(10) IU/ml). The overall test failure rate was 2.0% among 204 clinical serum specimens tested. Total time required for MP sample processing and automated postelution handling of 24 samples was 224 min, with 57 min of actual hands-on time. MP is a reliable, labor-saving platform suitable for use with TaqMan HBV ASR, providing sensitive and accurate quantification of HBV DNA levels over a range of 8 log(10) IU/ml.     

Performance characteristics of the COBAS Amplicor Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Monitor, Version 2.0, International Unit assay and the National Genetics Institute HCV Superquant assay

The COBAS Amplicor Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Monitor assay, version 2.0, which reports in international units per milliliter, was compared to the assay reported in copies per milliliter by analyzing dilution series and clinical plasma samples by both methods. In addition, the Amplicor international unit assay was compared to the National Genetics Institute HCV Superquant assay. The dilution series ranged from <100 to 5,000,000 HCV RNA copies/ml and consisted of 32 points, assayed in triplicate in each assay. Thirty clinical samples ranging from 1,000 to 1,000,000 HCV RNA copies/ml were assayed in duplicate. Deming regression analysis comparing the Amplicor HCV RNA international units-per-milliliter and copies-per-milliliter assays was calculated as follows: (Amplicor international units per milliliter) = 1.030(Amplicor copies per milliliter) - 0.392; R(2) = 0.981; n = 28; S(y/x) (standard error of the estimate) = 0.129. The linearity of the Amplicor international units-per-milliliter assay was as follows: observed = 0.886(expected) + 0.437; R(2) = 0.983; n = 30. The linearity of the Superquant assay was as follows: observed= 0.918 (expected) + 0.436; R(2) = 0.986; n = 32. Deming regression analysis comparing the Amplicor and Superquant assays was calculated as follows: Superquant = 1.066(Amplicor) - 0.0197; R(2) = 0.908; S(y/x) = 0.308; n = 28. The Amplicor and Superquant assays were linear through the range of 600 to 600,000 IU of HCV RNA/ml and approximately 300 to 5,000,000 HCV RNA copies/ml, respectively. The narrow range of the Amplicor assay means that some samples will require dilution and retesting for accurate quantification above 600,000 IU of HCV RNA/ml. The Amplicor and Superquant assays agreed well within the range of 600 to 600,000 IU of HCV RNA/ml (approximately 1,000 to approximately 1,000,000 HCV RNA copies/ml). Overall, the Amplicor and Superquant assays agree well, and results obtained in one assay could be expected to compare well with results from the other when reported in copies per milliliter.     

Performance characteristics of a quantitative TaqMan hepatitis C virus RNA analyte-specific reagent

We determined the dynamic range, reproducibility, accuracy, genotype bias, and sensitivity of the TaqMan hepatitis C virus (HCV) analyte-specific reagent (ASR). Serum samples were processed using the MagNA Pure LC instrument and run on the COBAS TaqMan 48 analyzer. The performance characteristics of the ASR were also compared with those of the qualitative AMPLICOR and quantitative AMPLICOR MONITOR HCV tests. The ASR exhibited a >/=6-log(10) linear dynamic range and excellent reproducibility, with a mean coefficient of variation of 14%. HCV RNA concentration measured with the ASR agreed within an average of 0.42 log(10) (2.6-fold) of the labeled concentration with members of a standard reference panel. HCV genotypes 1 to 4 were amplified with similar efficiencies with the ASR. The ASR and AMPLICOR MONITOR viral load results were significantly correlated (r = 0.8898; P < 0.01), but the agreement was poor (mean difference, 0.45 +/- 0.35 log(10)) for 72 HCV RNA-positive clinical samples. However, 98.9% agreement between the ASR and qualitative AMPLICOR test results was found with 60 positive and 29 negative samples. Limiting-dilution experiments demonstrated that the limits of detection for ASR and AMPLICOR tests were 84 and 26 IU/ml, respectively. The performance characteristics of the TaqMan HCV ASR are appropriate for all clinical applications of HCV RNA testing.     

Performance of an automated system for quantification of hepatitis C virus RNA

The Amplicor HCV Monitor test for quantitative determination of serum or plasma hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA was modified recently and introduced onto the Cobas Amplicor instrument to automate fully amplification, detection and calculation of results. This new version (v2.0) was evaluated in a routine diagnostic laboratory. The sensitivity and reproducibility were assessed on well-characterized panels (Eurohep) and clinical samples. HCV RNA levels measured by the v2.0 Monitor test were about 1log(10) higher than those detected by the previous version test, and genotypes 1 and 3 were quantified with equal sensitivity. Within the linear dynamic range of 10(3) to 10(6) copies/ml, the coefficients of variation for both intra- and inter-assay reproducibility ranged from 1.9 to 2.95%. This test system was found to be a reliable and labor saving assay for the quantification of HCV RNA.     

Evaluation of the NucliSens EasyQ assay in HIV-1-infected individuals in South Africa

We compared the performance of the NucliSens EasyQ assay (bioMerieux) combined with the manual NucliSens miniMag extraction methodology to the Roche Cobas Ampliprep/Standard Amplicor Monitor methodology (Roche Diagnostics) for HIV-1 RNA quantitation in HIV-1-infected individuals in South Africa. Plasma samples (284) from HIV sero-positive patients at different stages of infection were analyzed. The distribution of results was typical of the clinical samples received at the laboratory where 20% have viral load results <400 copies/ml (2.6 log) and 18% have viral load results >750000 copies/ml (5.8 log) using the Roche Amplicor Monitor standard assay. All statistical analyses were performed using log10-transformed values for all the variables in the analyses, i.e. log10EasyQIU/ml, and log10RNA (log10 copies/ml, Amplicor). Roche values were converted from RNA copies per ml to IU/ml by multiplying the Roche value by 0.51. HIV RNA levels quantitated by the NucliSens EasyQ assay correlated significantly with those of the Roche Cobas Amplicor Monitor assay (r=0.874, p<0.0001). Reproducibility of the NucliSens EasyQ assay in the log6IU range yielded CV variance of 1.3-2.84% for two well-trained technologists. In addition, a retrospective evaluation of the performance of the NucliSens EasyQ assay in 102 runs (2448) samples was conducted in the laboratory over a 4-month interval. Factors considered during this evaluation included time taken to perform the assay, volume requirements, number of required repeats, potential for contamination.     

Detection and quantitation of HCV RNA using real-time PCR after automated sample processing

There is considerable evidence that the loss of hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA during the first 3 months of treatment with pegylated interferon plus ribavirin is a prognostic marker of response to therapy. Real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays for quantifying HCV RNA in plasma or serum are now commercially available. The extraction of HCV RNA can also be automated. This report analyses the performance of the COBAS Ampliprep-COBAS Taqman 48 (CAP/CTM) real-time PCR assay and compares this new test with the COBAS Amplicor HCV Monitor v 2.0 assay (CAM). CAP/CTM was 100% specific. The assay was linear across a wide range of HCV RNA concentrations without sample dilution. The intra-assay variation was 0.3-3.3% and the interassay variation was 1.5-6.7%. A total of 118 clinical samples with different HCV genotypes were assayed using both methods. The results obtained using the two methods were well correlated (r = 0.89, P < 0.001). The mean difference [CAP/CTM-CAM] was 0.17 log IU/ml and it was not influenced by the HCV genotype or by the subtype. It is concluded that the new CAP/CTM system is adequate for quantifying HCV RNA in clinical practice.     

Evaluation of real-time PCR laboratory-developed tests using analyte-specific reagents for cytomegalovirus quantification

Viral load testing for cytomegalovirus (CMV) has become the standard for the diagnosis of infection and monitoring of therapy at many transplant centers. However, no viral load test has been approved by the FDA. Therefore, many laboratories rely on laboratory-developed assays. This study evaluated the performance characteristics of two real-time PCR tests developed using the artus CMV analyte-specific reagents (ASRs). One version is distributed by Abbott Molecular and the other by QIAGEN. For plasma specimens, the Abbott test had a limit of detection of 2.3 log10 copies/ml and a linear range up to at least 6.0 log10 copies/ml. Comparison of plasma viral loads using the Abbott test and the Roche Amplicor Monitor test showed a mean difference of -0.012 log10 copies/ml. In addition, the Abbott test viral loads correlated with the Digene Hybrid Capture assay ratios. Viral loads obtained from plasma specimens tested by the Abbott and QIAGEN tests were in very close agreement (mean difference, 0.144 log10 copies/ml). When the QIAGEN test was evaluated with the QIAGEN, MagNA Pure, and easyMAG extraction methods, the viral loads for all three methods were within 0.370 log10 copies/ml. Thus, there is good agreement between viral loads obtained by the different tests using the same extraction method or by the same test using different extraction methods. The availability of real-time PCR ASRs provides additional reagents that can be used for CMV viral load testing.