Renal effects of amphotericin B lipid complex

A study was conducted to compare the renal effects of amphotericin B lipid complex (ABLC), a lipid formulation of the widely used antifungal medication, with conventional amphotericin B (AmB) in the treatment of serious fungal infections, including invasive candidiasis, cryptococcal meningitis, and aspergillosis. The clinical experience of ABLC includes two types of open-label studies: randomized comparative (ABLC 5 mg/kg/d compared with AmB 0.6 to 1 mg/kg) and emergency use. In the comparative studies, changes in serum creatinine were evaluated three ways: doubling of the baseline value, an increase from < or = 1.5 mg/dL at baseline to > or = 1.5 mg/dL, and an increase from < or = 1.5 mg/dL at baseline to > or = 2.0 mg/dL. More patients in the AmB group reached these end points than in the ABLC group (P < or = 0.007), and the time needed to reach each of these end points was significantly shorter for the AmB group (P < or = 0.02). Increased serum creatinine was reported as an adverse event more frequently by patients receiving AmB than by patients receiving ABLC. In the emergency use study, a steady and statistically significant decrease in serum creatinine was observed among patients who started ABLC treatment with serum creatinine greater than 2.5 mg/dL due to prior AmB treatment. ABLC offers the physician a valuable, less-nephrotoxic alternative to AmB for the treatment of patients with severe, invasive fungal infections.     

Safety of aerosolized amphotericin B lipid complex in lung transplant recipients

BACKGROUND: Fungal infections remain an important cause of morbidity and mortality in lung transplant recipients. Aerosolized amphotericin B lipid complex (ABLC) may be more efficacious than conventional amphotericin B in the prevention of fungal infections in animal models, but experience with aerosolized ABLC in humans is lacking. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, noncomparative study designed to evaluate safety of aerosolized ABLC in lung or heart-lung transplant recipients. RESULTS: A total of 381 treatments were administered to 51 patients. Complete spirometry records were available for 335 treatments (69 in intubated patients, 266 in extubated patients). ABLC was subjectively well tolerated in 98% of patients. Pulmonary mechanics worsened by 20% or more posttreatment in less than 5% of all treatments. There were no significant adverse events related to study medication in any patient, and 1-year survival for all enrolled patients was 78%. CONCLUSION: Administration of nebulized ABLC is safe in the short-term and well-tolerated in lung transplant recipients. Additional prospective, randomized studies are needed to determine the efficacy of aerosolized ABLC alone or in conjunction with systemic therapies in the prevention of fungal infections in lung transplant recipients.     

Comparative safety of amphotericin B lipid complex and amphotericin B deoxycholate as aerosolized antifungal prophylaxis in lung-transplant recipients

BACKGROUND: Aerosolized administrations of amphotericin B deoxycholate (AmBd) and amphotericin B lipid complex (ABLC) in lung transplant recipients were compared for safety and tolerability. The incidence of invasive fungal infections in patients receiving aerosolized amphotericin B formulations as sole prophylaxis was determined. METHODS: A prospective, randomized (1:1), double-blinded trial was conducted with 100 subjects. AmBd and ABLC were administered postoperatively by nebulizer at doses of 25 mg and 50 mg, respectively, which were doubled in mechanically ventilated patients. The planned treatment was once every day for 4 days, then once per week for 7 weeks. Treatment-related adverse events and invasive fungal infections were quantitated for 2 months after study drug initiation. RESULTS: Intent-to-treat analysis revealed study drug was discontinued for intolerance in 6 of 49 (12.2%) and 3 of 51 (5.9%) patients in the AmBd- and ABLC-treated groups, respectively (p=0.313). Subjects receiving AmBd were more likely to have experienced an adverse event (odds ratio 2.16, 95% confidence interval 1.10, 4.24, p=0.02). Primary prophylaxis failure within 2 months of study drug initiation was observed in 7 of 49 (14.3%) AmBd-treated patients and 6 of 51 (11.8%) ABLC-treated patients. No fungal pneumonias were observed. Only two (2%) patients experienced documented primary prophylaxis failure with Aspergillus infections within the follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: Both aerosol AmBd and ABLC appear to be associated with a low rate of invasive pulmonary fungal infection in the early posttransplant period. Patients receiving ABLC were less likely to experience a treatment-related adverse event.     

Safety of anidulafungin in solid organ transplant recipients

The aim of this study was the evaluation of the safety of anidulafungin in adult solid organ transplantation (SOT) recipients. During the study period (14 months), we included all consecutive SOT recipients from 14 centers who received anidulafungin for at least 48 hours for the treatment of invasive fungal infections (IFIs) or as prophylaxis. Relevant clinical and analytical information on clinical charts was reviewed. Clinical side effects, liver function tests, and serum creatinine levels were assessed at least weekly. The need for the modification of immunosuppressive drugs was also recorded by the investigators. All patients were followed for at least 1 week after the end of treatment (EOT) or until death. Eighty-six SOT recipients were evaluated (56 transplant recipients, 20 lung transplant recipients, 8 kidney transplant recipients, and 2 heart transplant recipients). Sixty-two patients (72%) received anidulafungin for prophylaxis, and 24 (28%) received anidulafungin for the treatment of IFIs [candidemia/invasive candidiasis (16) or invasive aspergillosis (8)]. At the baseline, only 5% of the patients were neutropenic (<500 neutrophils/mL). There was no need for the modification of immunosuppressive drug doses because of anidulafungin therapy. No patient discontinued anidulafungin because of severe adverse effects. While receiving anidulafungin, 1 patient developed mild liver toxicity, but the liver function normalized without the discontinuation of anidulafungin. At EOT, the median serum creatinine, aspartate aminotransferase, and alanine aminotransferase levels were significantly lower than the baseline levels, even in liver transplant recipients and patients who had higher baseline levels of serum creatinine. In conclusion, these results show that anidulafungin is a well-tolerated drug in SOT recipients.     

Invasive aspergillosis in solid-organ transplantation: report of eight cases and review of the literature

Invasive fungal infections are life-threatening complications in solid-organ transplantation. Although the rate of fungal infections in transplant recipients is lower than that of other infections, the mortality rate is higher. The most frequent fungi isolated from these kinds of infections are Candida spp. and Aspergillus spp. We retrospectively evaluated the clinical and laboratory findings in eight patients who were treated for invasive aspergillosis (IA) at our center. This report describes these cases and discusses the relevant literature.     

Prospective interventional study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of liposomal amphotericin B as prophylaxis of fungal infections in high-risk liver transplant recipients

INTRODUCTION: Invasive fungal infections are a life-threatening complication in transplant recipients. The prevalence of fungal infection after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) is 5% to 42%. The most common isolated pathogens are Candida and Aspergillus species. High-risk liver transplant recipients are more susceptible to the development of invasive fungal infections, with prevalence >40% and mortality rates of 78% to 100%. The strategy for fungal prophylaxis in this population has not been defined. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Among 100 consecutive OLT followed for 28 months, 21 recipients (15 men, overall mean age of 48.5 years, range 23-65 years) were considered to be high risk for the development of fungal infections when they presented at least one of the following criteria: acute liver failure, assisted ventilation >7 days, retransplantation, relaparotomy, antibiotic therapy >14 days, transfusion requirements >20 red blood cells units, and/or biliary leakage. This group received intravenous liposomal amphotericin B (1 mg/kg/d for 7-10 days). RESULTS: One-year survival in the high-risk group was 80%. Prevalence of invasive fungal infection was 9.5%. No Candida infection was observed. Two patients developed Aspergillus infection: an abdominal aspergillosis treated with percutaneous drainage and liposomal amphotericin B (5 mg/kg/d) showed a favorable clinical outcome. The other patient who developed brain aspergillosis died 25 days after OLT. Adverse events related to the drug were hypokalemia (n = 2), back pain (n = 3), and renal dysfunction (n = 2). None of these events required withdrawal of the prophylaxis regimen. CONCLUSION: In our series, prophylaxis with liposomal amphotericin B in high-risk liver graft recipients showed a low rate of severe fungal infections. More studies are needed in order to determine the highest risk population and the best drug dosage.     

Caspofungin in the treatment of azole-refractory esophageal candidiasis in kidney transplant recipients

BACKGROUND: Infection is a common cause of morbidity and mortality in kidney transplant recipients. The incidence of esophageal and urogenital candidiasis in kidney and kidney-pancreas transplant recipients has not been well documented. Azoles are safe, effective agents to treat esophageal candidiasis. However, resistance to azoles is now becoming common. This study reports the use of caspofungin for the treatment of azole-resistant esophageal and urogenital candidiasis in kidney transplant recipients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The incidence of esophageal and urogenital candidiasis was evaluated among 140 kidney transplantations and four combined kidney-pancreas transplants performed over a 2-year period. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients (15.7%) presented with esophageal candidiasis, while seven patients (5%) showed urogenital candidiasis. Thirteen patients with esophageal candidiasis (59%) and four patients (57%) with urogenital candidiasis did not improve after a week of azole treatment. A regimen of caspofungin was started in these patients, who tolerated the treatment. Urogenital candidiasis recurred in two patients 2 and 3 months after the treatment. One patient with esophageal candidiasis did not improve with caspofungin and was switched to amphotericin B therapy. There were no other recurrences of candidiasis among patients treated with caspofungin for a median follow-up of 8 months. CONCLUSIONS: Renal transplant patients remain at high risk for fungal infections. Although the number of patients was limited, the results of this study indicated that caspofungin is an effective, well-tolerated alternative for difficult-to-treat, azole-resistant candida infections in kidney and pancreas transplant recipients. The high costs of the drug limit the use of caspofungin as first-line antifungal therapy, reserving its use to recipients who had undergone unsuccessful azole therapy.     

Voriconazole in the treatment of invasive aspergillosis in kidney transplant recipients

BACKGROUND: Aspergillosis and other invasive mold infections are severe complications in immunosuppressed patients, and in renal transplant patients it is the most common cause of systemic fungal disease with an incidence ranging from 0.4% to 2.4% with a high mortality of 56% to 100%. We present our experience with voriconazole in a population of kidney transplant recipients with invasive aspergillosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From January 2002 to December 2005, 245 kidney transplantations were performed. RESULTS: Four patients (1.6%) presented with clinical and laboratory findings of invasive aspergillosis. Three patients presented with pulmonary aspergillosis, while one patient presented with pulmonary and ocular aspergillosis. All patients underwent a therapy with voriconazole 200 mg twice a day, in combination with caspofungin in one patient. All patients are alive, with no clinical recurrence of aspergillosis at a median follow-up of 13 months. One patient lost her graft due to discontinuation of immunosuppression. CONCLUSIONS: Voriconazole is a potent and well-tolerated antifungal drug that is extremely efficacious in the treatment of invasive aspergillosis in kidney transplant recipients. A careful monitoring of immunosuppressive drugs should be considered to avoid nephrotoxicity.     

Aspergillus infections after lung transplantation: clinical differences in type of transplant and implications for management.

BACKGROUND: Invasive aspergillosis is a serious opportunistic infection in lung transplant recipients. It has not been fully discerned whether there are differences in the characteristics, risk factors and outcome of Aspergillus infection in single as compared with bilateral lung transplant recipients. METHODS: English-language articles identified by a MEDLINE search through December 2000 and bibliographies were used as data sources to identify cases of Aspergillus infections in lung transplant recipients. The studies selected had to have provided a definition of invasive aspergillosis to distinguish colonization from infection. RESULTS: The median incidence of Aspergillus infections in lung transplant recipients was 6.2%. In total, 58% (45 of 78) of the Aspergillus infections were tracheobronchitis or bronchial anastomotic infections, 32% (25 of 78) were invasive pulmonary, and 22% (25 of 78) were disseminated infections. Single lung transplant recipients with Aspergillus infections were significantly older (p = 0.006), more likely to have had chronic obstructive pulmonary disease as an underlying illness (p = 0.05), more likely to have developed Aspergillus infections later after transplantation (p = 0.019), and tended to have a higher incidence of invasive aspergillosis (p = 0.11) than all other lung transplant recipients. Overall mortality in lung transplant recipients with Aspergillus infections was 52%. Single lung transplant recipients (p = 0.03), and patients with late-onset infections (occurring at least 3 months after transplantation ([p = 0.045]) infections had significantly higher mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Single lung transplant recipients with Aspergillus infections had an overall greater morbidity and poorer outcome than other types of lung transplant recipients. Recognition of the unique characteristics of Aspergillus infections in single lung (vs bilateral or heart-lung) transplant recipients has implications relevant for the management of lung transplant recipients with aspergillosis.     

Hypogammaglobulinemia in lung transplant recipients

BACKGROUND: Infectious complications continue to represent a significant source of morbidity and mortality in lung transplant recipients. Identifying specific, remediable immune defects is of potential value. After one lung transplant patient with recurrent infections was noted to be severely hypogammaglobulinemic, a screening program for humoral immune defects was instituted. The objectives were to define the prevalence of hypogammaglobulinemia in lung transplant recipients, assess levels of antibody to specific pathogens, and correlate infectious disease outcomes and survival with immunoglobulin levels. METHODS: All lung transplant recipients followed at a single center between October 1996 and June 1999 underwent a posttransplant humoral immune status survey as part of routine posttransplant follow-up. This survey consists of total immunoglobulin levels (IgG, IgM, IgA), IgG subclasses (IgG1-4), and antibody titers to Pneumococcus, diphtheria, and tetanus. Since February 1997, this survey has been incorporated into the pretransplant evaluation as well. Humoral survey results for October 1996 through July 1999 were recorded, and clinical information on major infectious disease outcomes was obtained from chart reviews, discharge summaries, the Cleveland Clinic Unified Transplant Database, and review of all microbiological studies and pathology results for each patient. RESULTS: Of 67 patients with humoral immune surveys drawn posttransplant, 47 (70%) had IgG levels less than 600 mg/dl (normal 717-1410 mg/dl), of which 25 (37%) had IgG levels less than 400 mg/dl ("lowest IgG group") and 22 (33%) had IgG levels between 400 and 600 mg/dl ("moderately low IgG group"). A total of 20 patients (30%) had IgG levels of more than 600 mg/dl ("normal IgG group"). Infections that were significantly more common in the lowest IgG group, and more common in the moderately low IgG group than the normal IgG group, included: number of pneumonias (P=0.0006), bacteremias (P=0.02), total bacterial infections (P=0.002), tissue-invasive cytomegalovirus (P=0.01), invasive aspergillosis (P=0.001), total fungal infections (P=0.001), and total infections (P=0.006). Median hospital days per posttransplant year was significantly different in the three groups (11.0 vs. 7.4 vs. 2.8 days, P=0.0003.) Invasive aspergillosis occurred in 44% of the lowest IgG group, 9% of the moderately low IgG group, and 0% of the normal IgG group (P<0.001). Survival was poorest in the lowest IgG group and intermediate in the moderately low IgG group. IgG subclass deficiencies occurred in a variety of patterns. Hypogammaglobulinemic patients lacked protective responses to Pneumococcus in 14/47 (30%), diphtheria in 15%, and tetanus in 19%. In a group of 48 patients screened pretransplant, 90% had normal immunoglobulin levels. CONCLUSIONS: Hypogammaglobulinemia in lung transplant recipients is more common than has been previously recognized. An IgG level of less than 400 mg/dl identifies a group at extremely high risk of bacterial and fungal infections, tissue-invasive cytomegalovirus, and poorer survival. Immunoglobulin monitoring may offer an opportunity for intensive surveillance, tapering of immunosuppression, and preemptive therapy for infection.     

Aerosol Deposition of Lipid Complex Amphotericin-B (Abelcet) in Lung Transplant Recipients

Lung transplant recipients exhibit a high incidence of invasive aspergillosis. The inhalation of lipid complex amphotericin-B (Abelcet; ABLC) offers a possible prophylactic strategy. The goals of this study were to select the optimal nebulizer delivery system for ABLC and to measure deposited aerosol dose in 12 lung transplant recipients. In vitro testing was performed to select a nebulizer delivery system, and an empirical model was used to estimate lung deposition. Estimated pulmonary doses varied by as much as 2-fold between different nebulizers. Aerosol deposition testing was performed in six single and six double lung recipients, each of whom received one 7 mL (35 mg) nebulized dose of Technetium-labeled ABLC using the selected nebulizer. In single lung recipients, the average deposited doses were 3.9 +/- 1.6 mg (mean +/- S.D.) in the allograft versus 2.1 +/- 1.1 mg in the native lung. Double lung recipients deposited on average 2.8 +/- 0.8 mg (left lung) and 4.0 +/- 1.3 mg (right lung). The drug was well distributed throughout the lungs, but delivery to the native lung was in some cases suboptimal. These studies provide an important precursor to studies of the efficacy of inhaled ABLC as a prophylaxis of invasive aspergillosis after lung transplant.     

Fungal infections in transplant recipients receiving alemtuzumab

Recently, we have used an anti-T-cell agent, alemtuzumab, as induction or conversion therapy to achieve a calcineurin (CNI) and steroid-free immunosuppressive regimen. We identified recipients who developed systemic fungal infections after the initiation of alemtuzumab and looked at their outcomes. The study population consisted of all pancreas transplant recipients who received alemtuzumab. Only invasive fungal infections were included in the analysis (eg, fungemia, meningitis, or pneumonia; fungal urinary tract infections were excluded). The organism was confirmed by culture, histopathology, or latex antigen test. Between February 2003 and February 2004, a total of 121 pancreas transplant recipients received alemtuzumab-56 as part of induction, and 65 as part of conversion. Of these, 8 (6.6%) developed an invasive fungal infection; 2 (3.6%) recipients as part of induction therapy and 6 (9.2%) as part of conversion therapy. Mean recipient age was 42.1 years. The mean length of time from alemtuzumab administration (first dose) to the diagnosis of the fungal infection was 115.9 days (range 5 to 318). The organisms identified initially were: Cryptococcus, Histoplasma, Aspergillus, and Candida. Overall, 3 (38%) of the eight patients died during ongoing treatment of their fungal infection: two from sepsis, one due to myocardial infarction. The other five recipients were treated successfully and have functioning grafts. The initial therapeutic agents used included: amphotericin B/liposomal AMB (n = 6), voriconazole (n = 3), capsofungin (n = 2), and fluconazole (n = 1). The use of alemtuzumab as induction or conversion therapy in pancreas transplant recipients may predispose patients to the development of systemic fungal infections. It would be important to determine what the most appropriate prophylaxis regimen would be for these patients.     

Trends in invasive fungal infections in liver transplant recipients: correlation with evolution in transplantation practices.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of invasive fungal infections, particularly invasive candidiasis, after liver transplantation is strongly influenced by surgical factors and technical complexity of the surgery. We assessed the temporal trends in invasive fungal infections in the context of evolution in liver transplantation practices, technical developments, and other risk factors. METHODS: Demographic and clinical characteristics of the patients, transplantation-related variables, and rates of infection were longitudinally analyzed over the last 10 years in 190 consecutive liver transplant recipients at our institution. Trends for categorical data were evaluated using the Cochran-Armitage trend test and for continuous variables using analysis of variance with linear contrast. RESULTS: A decrease in the length of operation (P=0.03), intraoperative transfusion requirements (P=0.0001), cold ischemic time (P<0.0001), use of roux-en-Y biliary anastomosis (P=0.0015), rate of biopsy proven rejection (P<0.0001), and retransplantation (P=0.056) was documented over the successive years. A significant decline in Child-Pugh score (P=0.02) and in the proportion of patients transplanted as UNOS 2a occurred (P=0.0001). Although the incidence of cytomegalovirus infection remained unchanged, a significant increase in the frequency of primary cytomegalovirus infection (P=0.045), and a decrease in cytomegalovirus disease (P=0.0006) was documented. Over the same time period, a significant decrease in the incidence of invasive candidiasis (P=0.015), and an insignificant increase in the rate of invasive aspergillosis (P=0.20) occurred. CONCLUSION: Notable technical developments in liver transplantation practices and risk profiles of patients have occurred over the decade. These variables may have a role in influencing the evolving trends in invasive fungal infections in liver transplant recipients.     

Mucocutaneous lesions in transplant recipient in a tropical country

Dermatological manifestations are common in renal transplant patients, but differ markedly with ethnic group and geographical location. We studied mucocutaneous lesions in 54 renal allograft recipients (related donors = 30; unrelated donors = 24) living in tropical atmospheres. Their gender was 50 males, and 4 females ranging in age between 15 and 63 years (mean = 37.84 years). The mean duration of follow-up was 124 months (range = 4 to 173 months). All patients received kidneys from living donors and were kept on immunosupression with mean daily doses of prednisolone, azathioprine, and cyclosporine of 10.2 mg, 68.6 mg, and 252 mg, respectively. The mean trough concentration of cyclosporine was 185 ng/mL. The mucocutaneous lesions were divided into four groups: drug-induced (n = 24, 44.4%), fungal (n = 18, 33.3%), viral (n = 9, 16.6%), and bacterial (n = 10, 18.5%). Cushingoid features, gum hypertrophy, and hypertrichosis were seen in 7 (12.9%) patients. Steroid acne was seen in three cases. Pityriasis versicolor was the most common (20.3%) fungal infection of the skin. In addition, Tinea unguium and mucocutaneous candidiasis were noted in four and three cases respectively. Herpes virus infection (Herpes zoster 5; Herpes simplex 2) was noted in 7 (12.9%) cases. Chicken pox at 5 years posttransplant and cutaneous vasculitis associated with cytomegalovirus disease at 6 months posttransplant were seen in one case each. We have not seen warts in our patients. Pyogenic bacterial infection of skin in the form of abscess (n = 6), cellulitis (n = 3), and pyoderma (n = 1) were observed in 10 (18.5%) patients. Thus, drug-induced mucocutaneous side effects and skin fungal infections are the most common dermatological manifestations among renal transplant recipients living in a tropical country.     

Cutaneous manifestations in Italian kidney transplant recipients

Several cutaneous disorders may occur in organ transplant recipients. We examined the incidence and the clinical spectrum of cutaneous manifestations among kidney transplant recipients. One hundred nine patients (70 males and 39 females), aged 19 to 69 years (mean: 42.5 years), were consecutively examined as outpatients between June 2000 and August 2004. The mean interval after kidney transplantation was 61 months (range: 2 to 120 months). The immunosuppressive regimen consisted of combinations including cyclosporine, systemic corticosteroids, azathioprine, tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, antivirals, and antibiotics. Ninety-one cutaneous manifestations were identified in 60 of 109 (55.0%) kidney transplant patients over a 4-year period. Sixteen (17.5%) cutaneous viral infections identified in 11 patients (10.0%) included verruca vulgaris (n = 9), herpes zoster (n = 5) and herpes simplex (n = 2). Thirteen (11.9%) patients showed 19 (20.8%) superficial fungal infections, consisting of dermatophytosis (n = 6), onycomycosis (n = 6), pityriasis versicolor (n = 5) and mucocutaneous candidiasis (n = 2). Twenty (22%) nonmelanoma skin cancers were identified in seven (6.4%) patients, six basal cell carcinomas (BCC) in four patients, two squamous cell carcinomas (SCC) in two patients, and 11 BCCs in addition to one SCC in one patient. Twenty-six (23.8%) patients developed 32 (35.4%) drug-related manifestations, including acneiform eruption (n = 14), gingival hypertrophy (n = 6), hypertrichosis (n = 6), ecchymosis (n = 3), and plantar hyperkeratosis (n = 3). In addition, psoriasis and seborrheic dermatitis, which had been diagnosed before kidney transplantation, were observed in five and three patients, respectively. Our results emphasize the importance of dermatologic examinations and monitoring kidney transplant recipients to obtain an early diagnosis and treatment of cutaneous manifestations.     

A retrospective analysis of the use of caspofungin in recipients of liver transplant with a modified high index of suspicion for fungal infection. A critical review of mortality,acute cellular rejection,infections, and changes in the liver function tests while on caspofungin

Doria C, Bodzin AS, Vaccino S, Daskalakis C, Krawitz S, Ramirez CB. A retrospective analysis of the use of caspofungin in recipients of liver transplant with a modified high index of suspicion for fungal infection. A critical review of mortality, acute cellular rejection, infections, and changes in the liver function tests while on caspofungin.
Clin Transplant 2011: 25: 569–575. © 2010 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Abstract: This study is a retrospective analysis of death, adverse events (AE), fungal infections, and hepatic function among recipients of liver transplantation at high risk of fungal infection who received prophylactic treatment with caspofungin. After reviewing data of 105 patients who had received isolated liver transplant between January 2003 and April 2007, we identified and analyzed 82 high‐risk patients. Post‐transplant patients at high risk for fungal infection are commonly defined by the presence of at least one of the following: (i) re‐transplantation; (ii) re‐operation; (iii) renal dysfunction. However, in our practice, patients are also considered at high risk for developing fungal infections if they present with the following: (iv) fever of unknown origin; (v) hypothermia; (vi) positive random culture for fungus at the time of transplant (bile and/or ascites); (vii) sepsis; (viii) use of vasopressors; (ix) re‐intubation, during the first hospitalization after liver transplant; (x) prolonged intubation (>24 h), and (xi) acute respiratory distress syndrome, until negative fungal cultures are obtained. Exact conditional logistic regression was used to compare the risk of death, AEs, and fungal infections between patients who received caspofungin, other antifungal drugs, and no antifungal drugs. Analyses were then performed with SAS 9.1 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). Patients were between 27 and 72 yr old (mean = 55), with two‐thirds male and three‐quarters Caucasian. Sixteen patients received caspofungin (11 preventively), and 32 received other antifungal (26 preventively). There were no proven fungal infections among the patients who received caspofungin, three infections among patients who received other antifungal (3/26 = 12%), and 14 infections among patients who were not preventively treated (14/45 = 31%). These infection rates were significantly different across the three groups (p = 0.029), with caspofungin and other antifungal preventive treatment comparable (p = 0.540), and both better than no preventive treatment at all (OR = 0.15, p = 0.049, for caspofungin versus no preventive treatment; OR = 0.29, p = 0.085, for other antifungal versus no preventive treatment). Caspofungin appears to be an effective preventive agent against fungal infections when used in recipients of liver transplant designated as high risk for fungal infection. Usage of caspofungin in these patients does not carry an apparent increase in risk of death or acute cellular rejection, although we observed a significantly higher risk of AEs, especially acute renal failure (p = 0.001), in patients who received this agent.     

Preemptive prophylaxis with a lipid preparation of amphotericin B for invasive fungal infections in liver transplant recipients requiring renal replacement therapy

BACKGROUND: Posttransplant renal replacement therapy has been shown to be an independently significant risk factor for invasive fungal infections after liver transplantation. We assessed the efficacy of a lipid preparation of amphotericin B as prophylaxis for invasive fungal infections, directed toward liver transplant recipients requiring renal replacement therapy. METHODS: A total of 148 patients transplanted between 1990 and 1997 received no antifungal prophylaxis. Since 1997, 38 patients underwent liver transplantation; antifungal prophylaxis with a lipid preparation of amphotericin B was used in patients requiring renal replacement therapy. RESULTS: Fifteen percent (22 of 148) of the patients transplanted before 1997 required renal replacement therapy. In this cohort, the incidence of invasive fungal infections (36% vs. 7%, P=0.0007) and invasive aspergillosis (14% vs. 2%, P=0.02) was significantly higher in patients who required renal replacement therapy compared with those who did not. Since 1997, 29% (11 of 38) of the patients required renal replacement therapy and received antifungal prophylaxis. Invasive fungal infections occurred in 36% (8 of 22) of the patients who received no prophylaxis (patients before 1997), and 0% (0 of 11, P=0.03) in those who received antifungal prophylaxis (since 1997). Antifungal prophylaxis was independently associated with protection from fungal infection (P=0.017). No reduction in mortality with antifungal prophylaxis was documented. CONCLUSION: Prophylaxis with a lipid preparation of amphotericin B was associated with a significant reduction in invasive fungal infections in high-risk liver transplant recipients, i.e., those requiring renal replacement therapy. However, no beneficial effect on survival could be documented.     

Fibrate-induced increase in blood urea and creatinine: is gemfibrozil the only innocuous agent?

BACKGROUND: Some reports indicate that fibrates can induce renal dysfunction. However, the clinical characteristics of these episodes, and the respective nephrotoxicity of the four main fibrates used-namely, fenofibrate, bezafibrate, ciprofibrate, and gemfibrozil-remain ill defined. METHODS: To better characterize this side-effect, we first reviewed the charts of 27 patients from our institution who developed an impairment of renal function during fibrate therapy. We next analysed the articles (n=24) that contained data on renal function in patients taking fibrates (n=2676). RESULTS: Among our 27 patients, 25 were on fenofibrate therapy, one was taking bezafibrate, and one ciprofibrate. Nineteen were recipients of solid-organ transplants (kidney recipients, n=15; heart or heart-lung recipients, n=4), and eight were non-transplanted patients with some impairment of renal function. Baseline plasma creatinine ranged from 0.9 to 2.9 mg/dl. It increased by a mean of 40% after the start of fibrate therapy. There was a concomitant increase of blood urea values (mean 36%) in most of the patients. Renal function returned to baseline in 18/24 patients after fibrate discontinuation. However, six patients, all transplant recipients, experienced a permanent increase in plasma creatinine. The incidence of fibrate-induced renal dysfunction among our series of kidney transplant recipients was 60%, as it occurred in 15 of the 25 patients who had ever taken fibrates. An increase of mean creatinine values during therapy was described in all papers on fenofibrate (n=7) and bezafibrate (n=8) (range 8-18% and 8-40% respectively), and in three of four papers dealing with ciprofibrate (range 6-16%). No significant renal impairment was described in any of the eight articles reporting data on gemfibrozil therapy. CONCLUSION: Therapy with fenofibrate, bezafibrate, and ciprofibrate may induce renal dysfunction. Gemfibrozil appears to be devoid of this side-effect.     

Hospitalizations for fungal infections after initiation of chronic dialysis in the United States.

AIMS: Hospitalized fungal infections are reported frequently in renal transplant recipients and peritoneal dialysis patients, but the frequency of hospitalized fungal infections in dialysis patients has not been studied in a national population. METHODS: 327,993 dialysis patients in the United States Renal Data System initiated from January 1, 1992 to June 30, 1997 were analyzed in a retrospective registry study of fungal infections (based on ICD9 Coding). RESULTS: Dialysis patients had an age-adjusted incidence ratio for fungal infections of 9.80 (95% confidence interval (CI) 6.34-15.25)) compared to the general population in 1996 (the National Hospital Discharge Survey). Candidiasis accounted for 79% of all fungal infections, followed by cryptococcosis (6.0%) and coccidioidomycosis (4.1%). In multivariate analysis, fungal infections were associated with earlier year of dialysis, diabetes, female gender, decreased weight and serum creatinine at initiation of dialysis, chronic obstructive lung disease and AIDS. In Cox regression analysis the hazard ratio for mortality of fungal infections was 1.35 (95% CI 1.28-1.42). CONCLUSIONS: Dialysis patients were at increased risk for fungal infections compared to the general population, which substantially decreased patient survival. Female and diabetic patients were at increased risk for fungal infections. Although candidiasis was the dominant etiology of fungal infections, the frequency of cryptococcosis and coccidioidomycosis were higher than previously reported.     

Invasive Fungal Infections in Low-Risk Liver Transplant Recipients: A Multi-Center Prospective Observational Study

Prevention of invasive fungal infections (IFIs) in orthotopic liver transplant (OLT) recipients utilizing postoperative systemic antifungal prophylaxis, typically with fluconazole, is justified among those at high risk for IFI. Use of postoperative antifungal prophylaxis for low-risk OLT recipients is widely practiced but not universally accepted nor supported by data. We conducted a prospective observational study among 200 OLT recipients who were at low risk for IFI and did not receive postoperative antifungal prophylaxis. Patients were considered low risk if they had /=units of 40 blood products or return to the operating room for intra-abdominal bleeding; return to the operating room for anastomotic leak or vascular insufficiency; preoperative serum creatinine of >/=2 mg/dL; and perioperative Candida colonization. Patients were followed 100 d post-transplantation for evidence of IFI. Of 193 eligible patients, 7 (4%) developed an IFI. Three (2%) IFIs were due to Candida spp. and potentially preventable by standard fluconazole prophylaxis. Three patients developed invasive aspergillosis; one developed late onset disseminated cryptococcosis. Liver transplant recipients at low risk for IFI can be identified utilizing pre-determined criteria, and post-transplantation antifungal prophylaxis can be routinely withheld in these patients.