A controlled family study of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and Tourette's disorder

OBJECTIVE: Although attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is frequently comorbid with Tourette's disorder (TD), it is unclear whether they have a common genetic etiology. Familial relationships between DSM-IV ADHD and TD are studied in TD+ADHD, TD-only (TD-ADHD), ADHD-only (ADHD-TD), and control groups. METHOD: Case-control, direct-interview family study of 692 relatives of 75 TD+ADHD, 74 TD-only, 41 ADHD-only, and 49 control probands collected between 1999 and 2004. Age-corrected prevalence rates, odds ratios, and predictors of TD, ADHD, and OCD among relatives are estimated from blinded best-estimate diagnoses using survival Kaplan-Meier and generalized estimating equation regression analyses. RESULTS: In relatives of the TD-only group, although ADHD exceeded control rates (p=.03), ADHD-TD (p=.51) rates were not increased. In the ADHD-only group, TD was increased (p=.004) but TD-ADHD rates were not increased (p=.18). Comorbid ADHD+TD diagnoses in relatives were elevated in all case groups (p相似文献   

Examining the association between attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and substance use disorders: A familial risk analysis

ObjectiveThe main aim of this study was to use familial risk analysis to examine the association between attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and substance use disorders (SUDs) attending to sex effects and the specificity of alcohol and drug use disorder risks.MethodsSubjects were derived from two longitudinal case-control family studies of probands aged 6–17 years with and without DSM-III-R ADHD of both sexes and their first degree relatives followed from childhood onto young adult years. Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate rates of ADHD and SUDs (any SUD, alcohol dependence, and drug dependence). Logistic regression was used to test both co-segregation and assortative mating.ResultsOur sample included 404 probands (ADHD: 112 boys and 96 girls; Control: 105 boys and 91 girls) and their 1336 relatives. SUDs in probands increased the risk for SUDs in relatives irrespective of ADHD status. The risk for dependence to drug or alcohol in relatives was non-specific. There was evidence that even in the absence of a SUD in the proband, ADHD by itself increased the risk of SUDs in relatives. Proband sex did not moderate the familial relationship between ADHD and SUDs. There was evidence of co-segregation between ADHD and SUD.ConclusionsFindings indicate that various independent pathways are involved in the transmission of SUD in ADHD and that these risks were not moderated by proband sex. ADHD children and siblings should benefit from preventive and early intervention strategies to decrease their elevated risk for developing a SUD.     

Anxiety and major depression comorbidity in a family study of obsessive-compulsive disorder

To understand the familial relationship between obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), other anxiety disorders, and major depressive disorder (MDD), we examined the rates of anxiety disorders and MDD in first-degree relatives of OCD probands and controls, the association between age at onset of OCD and the occurrence of other anxiety disorders and major depressive disorder in relatives of probands, and the co-transmission of specific anxiety disorders, MDD, and OCD within families of probands. Recurrence risks were estimated from 466 first-degree relatives of 100 probands with OCD and 113 first-degree relatives of 33 non-psychiatric controls. Rates of non-OCD anxiety disorders and MDD were comparable in relatives of OCD probands and controls. Rates of anxiety disorders and MDD were higher among case relatives with OCD than among case relatives without OCD and control relatives. Fifty percent of case relatives with OCD had at least one comorbid anxiety disorder. Early age at onset (<10 years) in probands was associated with higher rates of anxiety and depression comorbidity among case relatives with OCD but not among case relatives without OCD. The occurrence of specific anxiety disorders and MDD in case relatives was independent of the same comorbid diagnosis in the OCD probands. OCD, panic disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, and MDD occurred together more often than expected by chance among individuals with OCD. Furthermore, age at onset in probands is associated with specific anxiety and affective comorbidity among case relatives. These findings support the hypothesis that early- and late-onset OCD represent different etiologic variants.     

Examining the nature of the comorbidity between pediatric attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder and post‐traumatic stress disorder

Biederman J, Petty CR, Spencer TJ, Woodworth KY, Bhide P, Zhu J, Faraone SV. Examining the nature of the comorbidity between pediatric attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder and post‐traumatic stress disorder. Objective: This study sought to address the link between attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and post‐traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in youth by providing a comprehensive comparison of clinical correlates of ADHD subjects with and without PTSD across multiple non‐overlapping domains of functioning and familial patterns of transmission. Method: Participants were 271 youths with ADHD and 230 controls without ADHD of both sexes along with their siblings. Participants completed a large battery of measures designed to assess psychiatric comorbidity, psychosocial, educational, and cognitive parameters. Results: Post‐traumatic stress disorder was significantly higher in ADHD probands vs. controls (5.2% vs. 1.7%, χ²₍₁₎ = 4.36, P = 0.04). Irrespective of the comorbidity with PTSD, ADHD subjects had similar ages at onset of ADHD, similar type and mean number of ADHD symptoms, and similar ADHD‐associated impairments. PTSD in ADHD probands was significantly associated with a higher risk of psychiatric hospitalization, school impairment, poorer social functioning and higher prevalences of mood, conduct disorder, and anxiety disorders. The mean onset of PTSD (12.6 years) was significantly later than that of ADHD and comorbid disorders (all P < 0.05). Siblings of ADHD and ADHD + PTSD probands had higher prevalences of ADHD vs. siblings of controls (35% vs. 18%, z = 4.00, P < 0.001 and 67% vs. 18%, z = 4.02, P < 0.001 respectively) and siblings of ADHD+PTSD probands had a significantly higher prevalence of PTSD compared with the siblings of ADHD and control probands (20% vs. 3% and 3%, z = 2.99, P = 0.003 and z = 2.07, P = 0.04 respectively). Conclusion: Findings indicate that the comorbidity with PTSD in ADHD leads to greater clinical severity as regards psychiatric comorbidity and psychosocial dysfunction. ADHD is equally familial in the presence of PTSD in the proband indicating that their co‐occurrence is not owing to diagnostic error.     

A family study of obsessive-compulsive disorder

BACKGROUND: The causes of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) are as yet unknown. Evidence of familial aggregation is one approach for investigating the role of genetics in the etiology of this condition. The current study was conducted to determine ifOCD is familial and to investigate possible familial subtypes. METHODS: Eighty case probands were identified in 5 specialty OCD clinics and 73 community control probands were identified by random-digit dialing. These probands and their first-degree relatives (343 case and 300 control relatives) were blinded to group and evaluated by psychiatrists and doctoral-level clinical psychologists using semistructured instruments. Final diagnoses were assigned by a blinded-consensus procedure. The results were analyzed using logistic regression by the method of generalized estimating equations. RESULTS: The lifetime prevalence of OCD was significantly higher in case compared with control relatives (11.7% vs 2.7%) (P<.001). Case relatives had higher rates of both obsessions and compulsions; however, this finding is more robust for obsessions. Age at onset of obsessive-compulsive symptoms in the case proband was strongly related to familiality (odds ratio, 0.92; confidence interval, 0.85-0.99) (P = .05); no case of OCD symptoms was detected in the relatives of probands whose age at onset of symptoms was 18 years or older. Probands with tics or obsessive-compulsive personality disorder were not more likely to have relatives with OCD than those without these features. CONCLUSIONS: Obsessive-compulsive disorder is a familial disorder. Obsessions are more specific to the phenotype than are compulsions. Age at onset of OCD is valuable in characterizing a familial subtype.     

Association of bipolar and substance use disorders in parents of adolescents with bipolar disorder.

BACKGROUND: We have previously shown that juvenile bipolar disorder (BPD) is a risk for substance use disorders (SUD). Here we examine the expression of both disorders in families of youth with BPD to evaluate the familial risk mechanism. METHODS: We studied 108 adolescent BPD probands with 187 parents (34 with SUD and 58 parents) and 96 control probands with 177 parents with structured interviews. We compared the prevalence of BPD and SUD with Cox proportional hazards models with time to onset of BPD or SUD as the dependent variable and proband diagnosis (Control, BPD, or BPD+SUD) as the independent variable. RESULTS: The parents of the proband youth with BPD (without SUD) and BPD+SUD were more likely to develop BPD than the parents of control subjects [omnibus test chi2=10.18, p=.006]; we found no differences between the two bipolar groups. Parents of proband youth with BPD and with BPD+SUD were more likely than relatives of control subjects to develop SUD [omnibus test chi2=14.69, p<.001]; however, we found no differences between the parents of the two proband bipolar groups. Within the parents of proband youth with BPD+SUD, we found higher risk of SUD in parents with BPD than in those without BPD [chi2=8.39, p=.004], although the frequency of BPD was low in this group of parents. CONCLUSIONS: Bipolar disorder and SUD are prevalent in the first-degree relatives of adolescents with BPD. Adults with BPD were more likely to manifest SUD with preliminary evidence of BPD and SUD cosegregation.     

Attention-deficit disorder and conduct disorder in girls: evidence for a familial subtype.

BACKGROUND: The frequent comorbidity between attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and conduct disorder (CD) raises the possibility that ADHD+CD is a distinct and separate condition. METHODS: We tested hypotheses about patterns of familial association between ADHD, CD, oppositional defiant disorder (ODD) and adult antisocial personality disorder (ASPD). Using family study methodology in a sample of girls, we found 11 children with diagnoses of ADHD+ CD, 39 with ADHD+ODD, and 90 with ADHD only. These were compared with 122 non-ADHD, non-CD control probands. Familial risk analysis was utilized. RESULTS: Relatives of each ADHD proband subgroup were at significantly greater risk for ADHD, and the relatives of ADHD-only subjects were at a greater risk of ODD than relatives of control subjects. Also, rates of CD were elevated among relatives of ADHD+CD probands only, and the coaggregation of ADHD and the antisocial disorders could not be accounted for by marriages between ADHD and antisocial spouses. Both ADHD and antisocial disorders occurred in the same relatives more often than expected by chance. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that ADHD with and without antisocial disorders may be etiologically distinct disorders and provide evidence for the nosologic validity of ICD-10 hyperkinetic conduct disorder.     

A blind re-analysis of the Iowa family study of obsessive-compulsive disorder

We present results from a re-analysis of the Iowa family study of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) that previously concluded the disorder was not familial. These conclusions were based on Diagnostic Interview Schedule results of first-degree relatives (FDRs) and not a best estimate diagnosis (BED). For the re-analysis we reviewed raw data on OCD and control probands and their FDRs. Relatives had been assessed through structured interviews, validated questionnaires, family history, and medical records in some cases. BEDs were assigned through a blind consensus procedure employing DSM-IV criteria. The data were analyzed using logistic regression with generalized estimating equations to account for within family correlations. BEDs were assigned to 32 OCD probands, 31 control probands, and 352 FDRs, including 249 FDRs who were interviewed directly and 103 FDRs who were unavailable or deceased. Lifetime prevalence of definite/probable OCD was significantly higher in the FDRs of OCD probands than controls (10.7% vs. 3.8%, OR=3.04, p=0.026). FDRs of OCD probands had significantly higher rates of depressive illness than relatives of controls. Depression of any type in relatives was predicted by the proband's depression history. We conclude that OCD is familial. The re-analysis highlights the importance of the BED procedure in family studies.     

Familiality of factor analysis-derived YBOCS dimensions in OCD-affected sibling pairs from the OCD Collaborative Genetics Study.

BACKGROUND: Identification of familial, more homogenous characteristics of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) may help to define relevant subtypes and increase the power of genetic and neurobiological studies of OCD. While factor-analytic studies have found consistent, clinically meaningful OCD symptom dimensions, there have been only limited attempts to evaluate the familiality and potential genetic basis of such dimensions. METHODS: Four hundred eighteen sibling pairs with OCD were evaluated using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV and the Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (YBOCS) Symptom Checklist and Severity scales. RESULTS: After controlling for sex, age, and age of onset, robust sib-sib intraclass correlations were found for two of the four YBOCS factors: Factor IV (hoarding obsessions and compulsions (p = .001) and Factor I (aggressive, sexual, and religious obsessions, and checking compulsions; p = .002). Smaller, but still significant, familiality was found for Factor III (contamination/cleaning; p = .02) and Factor II (symmetry/ordering/arranging; p = .04). Limiting the sample to female subjects more than doubled the familiality estimates for Factor II (p = .003). Among potentially relevant comorbid conditions for genetic studies, bipolar I/II and major depressive disorder were strongly associated with Factor I (p < .001), whereas ADHD, alcohol dependence, and bulimia were associated with Factor II (p < .01). CONCLUSIONS: Factor-analyzed OCD symptom dimensions in sibling pairs with OCD are familial with some gender-dependence, exhibit relatively specific relationships to comorbid psychiatric disorders and thus may be useful as refined phenotypes for molecular genetic studies of OCD.     

Impact of obsessive‐compulsive disorder on the antimanic response to olanzapine therapy in youth with bipolar disorder

Joshi G, Mick E, Wozniak J, Geller D, Park J, Strauss S, Biederman J. Impact of obsessive‐compulsive disorder on the antimanic response to olanzapine therapy in youth with bipolar disorder.
Bipolar Disord 2010: 12: 196–204. © 2010 The Authors.
Journal compilation © 2010 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Objective: To compare antimanic response to olanzapine therapy in youth with bipolar disorder (BPD) based on the status of comorbidity with obsessive‐compulsive disorder (OCD). Methods: Secondary analysis of identically designed 8‐week open‐label trials of olanzapine therapy in youth with BPD. Severity of mania assessed with the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) and Clinical Global Impression (CGI) scales. Results: Of the 52 BPD subjects (mean age 8.4 ± 3.1 years) enrolled in the olanzapine trials (mean dose 8.5 ± 4.3 mg/day), 39% (n = 20) met criteria for comorbid OCD. Antimanic response in BPD subjects was significantly worse in the presence of comorbid OCD (YMRS mean reduction: ?5.9 ± 13.1 versus ?13.7 ± 18.8, p = 0.04; ≥ 30% reduction: 25% versus 63%, p = 0.008; CGI‐Improvement score ≤ 2: 25% versus 68%, p = 0.003). There was no difference in the rate of dropouts (50% versus 29%, p = 0.2) or adverse effects in BPD subjects with or without comorbid OCD. Conclusions: Less than expected antimanic response to olanzapine therapy in the presence of comorbidity with OCD suggests that OCD is an important functionally impairing psychiatric comorbidity that may impact the efficacy of antimanic agents in youth with BPD. This study is limited by its design of secondary analysis of data from trials of an uncontrolled nature. Further prospective controlled trials are warranted.     

Impulsiveness in obsessive-compulsive disorder: results from a family study

OBJECTIVE: Although obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is usually conceptualized as an anxiety disorder some studies suggested it to be a deficit of impulse control. The purpose of this study was to assess impulsiveness in OCD families and compare it to control families. METHOD: Seventy cases and their 139 relatives were compared with 70 controls and their 134 relatives from a German family study on OCD (German Epidemiologic Network for OCD Studies). All subjects were interviewed and diagnosed according DSM-IV criteria and were administered the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale (BIS) and PADUA-Inventory to assess obsessive-compulsive symptoms. RESULTS: OCD subjects had significantly higher scores of cognitive impulsiveness. However, first-degree relatives of OCD cases and of controls had comparable BIS-11 scores. Significant associations of aggressive obsessions and checking with cognitive impulsiveness were found. CONCLUSION: OCD is a severe mental disorder that is characterized by a lack of cognitive inhibition. However, impulsiveness does not represent a familial trait in families of OCD subjects.     

Clinical characteristics of comorbid obsessive‐compulsive disorder and bipolar disorder in children and adolescents

Joshi G, Wozniak J, Petty C, Vivas F, Yorks D, Biederman J, Geller D. Clinical characteristics of comorbid obsessive‐compulsive disorder and bipolar disorder in children and adolescents.
Bipolar Disord 2010: 12: 185–195.
© 2010 The Authors. Journal compilation © 2010 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Objective: To explore bidirectional comorbidity between bipolar disorder (BPD) and obsessive‐compulsive disorder (OCD) in youth and to examine the symptom profile and clinical correlates of both disorders in the context of reciprocal comorbidity and ascertainment status. Methods: Two samples of consecutively referred youth (ages 6–17 years) ascertained contemporaneously for respective studies of BPD and OCD were compared using clinical and scalar assessment and structured diagnostic interviews. Results: A total of 21% (17/82) of the BPD subjects and 15% (19/125) of the OCD subjects met DSM‐III‐R diagnostic criteria for both disorders. In the presence of BPD, youth with OCD more frequently experienced hoarding/saving obsessions and compulsions along with a clinical profile of greater comorbidity, poorer global functioning, and higher rate of hospitalization that is characteristic of BPD. Multiple anxiety disorders (≥ 3), especially generalized anxiety disorder and social phobia, were present at a higher frequency when OCD and BPD were comorbid than otherwise. In subjects with comorbid OCD and BPD, the primary disorder of ascertainment was associated with an earlier onset and more severe impairment. Conclusions: An unexpectedly high rate of comorbidity between BPD and OCD was observed in youth irrespective of primary ascertainment diagnosis. In youth with comorbid OCD and BPD, the clinical characteristics of each disorder run true and are analogues to their clinical presentation in youth without reciprocal comorbidity, with the exception of increased risk for obsessions and compulsions of hoarding/saving and comorbidity with other anxiety disorders.     

ADHD prevalence and association with hoarding behaviors in childhood‐onset OCD

Background: It has been suggested that attention‐deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD), both neurodevelopmental disorders with onset in childhood, are highly comorbid, but previous studies examining ADHD and OCD comorbidity have been quite variable, partly because of inconsistency in excluding individuals with tic disorders. Similarly, ADHD has been postulated to be associated with hoarding although this potential relationship is largely methodologically unexplored. This study aimed to examine the prevalence of ADHD among individuals with childhood‐onset OCD but without comorbid tic disorders, as well as to examine the relationship between clinically significant hoarding behaviors (hoarding) and ADHD. Method: ADHD prevalence rates and the relationship between ADHD and hoarding were examined in 155 OCD‐affected individuals (114 probands and 41 relatives, age range 4–82 years) recruited for genetic studies and compared to pooled prevalence rates derived from previously published studies. Results: In total, 11.8% met criteria for definite ADHD, whereas an additional 8.6% had probable or definite ADHD (total=20.4%). In total, 41.9% of participants with ADHD also had hoarding compared to 29.2% of participants without ADHD. Hoarding was the only demographic or clinical variable independently associated with ADHD (odds ratio=9.54, P<0.0001). Conclusion: ADHD rates were elevated in this sample of individuals with childhood‐onset OCD compared to the general population rate of ADHD, and there was a strong association between ADHD and clinically significant hoarding behavior. This association is consistent with recent studies suggesting that individuals with hoarding may exhibit substantial executive functioning impairments and/or abnormalities, including attentional problems. Depression and Anxiety, 2010. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Revisiting the association between attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and anxiety disorders: a familial risk analysis.

BACKGROUND: This study tested competing hypotheses about patterns of familial association between attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and anxiety disorders using familial risk analysis methodology. METHODS: The risk for ADHD and anxiety disorders in first-degree relatives was examined after stratifying ADHD probands by the presence or absence of comorbid anxiety disorders. The presence of anxiety disorders in probands and relatives was defined as meeting DSM-III-R diagnostic criteria for > or = 2 anxiety syndromes in the same subject. RESULTS: Familial risk analyses revealed that 1) the risk for anxiety disorders was significantly higher in ADHD probands and their relatives than in control probands and their relatives; 2) the risk for anxiety disorders among the relatives of ADHD probands was limited to those families in which the proband had a diagnosis of ADHD; 3) the risk for anxiety disorders was significantly higher among the relatives of ADHD probands with anxiety disorders than in relatives of ADHD probands without anxiety disorders, but these two groups did not differ in the familial risk for ADHD; and 4) ADHD and anxiety disorders did not cosegregate within families, and there was no evidence for nonrandom (assortative) mating. CONCLUSIONS: These findings are most consistent with the hypothesis that ADHD and anxiety disorders segregate independently in families.     

Familiality of obsessive-compulsive disorder in nonclinical and clinical subjects

OBJECTIVE: Studies of the familiality of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) have yielded inconsistent results. This study compared the familial aggregation of OCD in first-degree relatives of community subjects with never-treated OCD, outpatients with OCD, and comparison subjects. METHOD: Fifteen persons from the community with untreated OCD were matched on age and interview type (direct or through family informants) with 90 OCD patients from four treatment facilities and 70 comparison subjects. Direct or indirect interviews using the German-language version of the Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia-Lifetime Version for Anxiety Disorders (DSM-IV) were obtained from 58, 285, and 247 first-degree relatives, respectively, of the three groups. The rate of OCD in case versus comparison relatives was assessed with chi-square tests, and odds ratios were calculated for risk estimation. Cox proportional hazards analysis was used to estimate the age-related risk of relatives of being affected by OCD. RESULTS: Cox proportional hazards analyses revealed a 6.2-fold higher risk (hazard ratio) for relatives of all OCD cases for definite OCD and a 2.2-fold higher risk for subclinical OCD compared with relatives of comparison subjects. For relatives of community subjects with OCD, the risk for definite OCD (10.3% versus 5.6%) was 1.6, and the risk for subclinical OCD (15.4% versus 4.1%) was 3.4 compared with relatives of OCD patients from treatment sites. CONCLUSIONS: These results from the first controlled European family study of OCD confirm earlier U.S. data on the familiality of OCD in patients recruited from treatment facilities. The finding of a comparable familial aggregation of definite OCD and a higher familial aggregation of subclinical OCD in relatives of never-treated persons with OCD from the community strongly supports the impact of familial-genetic factors in OCD.     

A family study of obsessive-compulsive disorder.

First-degree relatives of probands with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) (n = 32) and psychiatrically normal controls (n = 33) were blindly interviewed with the use of the Diagnostic Interview Schedule. The morbidity risk for anxiety disorders was increased among the relatives of obsessional subjects compared with that for the relatives of controls, but the risk for OCD was not. Risk for a more broadly defined OCD (including relatives with obsessions and compulsions not meeting criteria for OCD) was increased among the parents of obsessional subjects but not among the parents of controls (16% vs 3%). The findings suggest that an anxiety disorder diathesis is transmitted in families with OCD, but that its expression within these families is variable. The findings also support the current practice of classifying OCD as an anxiety disorder.     

Magnetic resonance imaging of boys with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and their unaffected siblings

OBJECTIVE: To study the influence of increased familial risk for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) on brain morphology. METHOD: Volumetric cerebral measures based on whole brain magnetic resonance imaging scans from 30 boys with ADHD, 30 of their unaffected siblings, and 30 matched controls were compared. RESULTS: Both subjects with ADHD and their unaffected siblings displayed reductions in right prefrontal gray matter and left occipital gray and white matter of up to 9.1% (p < 0.05). Right cerebellar volume was reduced by 4.9% in subjects with ADHD (p = 0.026) but not in their unaffected siblings (p = 0.308). A 4.0% reduction in intracranial volume was found in subjects with ADHD (p = 0.031), while a trend was observed in their unaffected siblings (p = 0.068). CONCLUSIONS: The volumetric reductions in cortical gray and white matter in subjects with ADHD are also present in their unaffected siblings, suggesting that they are related to an increased familial risk for the disorder. In contrast, the cerebellum is unaffected in siblings, suggesting that the reduction in volume observed in subjects with ADHD may be more directly related to the pathophysiology of this disorder.     

Disorder-specific dysfunctions in patients with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder compared to patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder during interference inhibition and attention allocation

Background: Abnormalities in inhibitory control and underlying fronto‐striatal networks is common to both attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and obsessive‐compulsive‐disorder (OCD). The aim of this study was to investigate disorder‐specific abnormalities in neural networks mediating interference inhibition and selective attention. Method: Event‐related functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) was used to compare brain activation of boys with ADHD (18), with OCD (10), and healthy boys during (20) during a Simon task that measures interference inhibition and controls for and therefore comeasures attention allocation. Results: During interference inhibition, both patient groups shared mesial frontal dysfunction compared to controls. Disorder‐specific dysfunctions were observed in OCD patients in dorsolateral prefrontal cortex during the oddball condition and in ADHD patients in inferior parietal lobe during interference inhibition and in caudate and posterior cingulate during the simpler oddball condition. The decreased activation in caudate and cingulate in ADHD was furthermore negatively correlated with ADHD symptoms and positively with OCD behavioral traits. Conclusions: The study shows that ADHD and OCD patients have shared but also disorder‐specific brain dysfunctions during interference inhibition and attention allocation. Both disorders shared dysfunction in mesial frontal cortex. Disorder‐specific dysfunctions, however, were observed in dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in OCD patients and in caudate, cingulate, and parietal brain regions in ADHD patients. The disorder‐specific dissociation of striato‐cingulate activation that was increased in OCD compared to ADHD patients, was furthermore inversely related to the symptomatology of the two disorders, and may potentially reflect differential dopamine modulation of striatal brain regions. Hum Brain Mapp, 2011. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Case-control study of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder and maternal smoking, alcohol use, and drug use during pregnancy

OBJECTIVE: To address the putative association between attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and prenatal exposure to maternal cigarette smoking, drugs of abuse, and alcohol attending to potential confounding by familial ADHD, maternal depression, conduct disorder, and indicators of social adversity in the environment. METHOD: A retrospective, hospital-based, case-control study was conducted with 280 ADHD cases and 242 non-ADHD controls of both genders. The case and control children and their relatives were systematically assessed with structured diagnostic interviews. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine the adjusted effect of prenatal exposure to substance use and ADHD. RESULTS: ADHD cases were 2.1 times (95% confidence interval = 1.1-4.1;p = .02) more likely to have been exposed to cigarettes and 2.5 times (95% confidence interval = 1.1-5.5; p = .03) more likely to have been exposed to alcohol in utero than were the non-ADHD control subjects. Adjustment by familial psychopathology, Rutter's indicators of social adversity, and comorbid conduct disorder did not account for the effect of prenatal exposure to alcohol or the products of cigarettes. CONCLUSIONS: ADHD may be an additional deleterious outcome associated with prenatal exposure to alcohol independently of the association between prenatal exposure to nicotine and smoke products and other familial risk factors for the disorder.     

Tourette syndrome in youth with and without obsessive compulsive disorder and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder

Chronic tic disorders (TD) are consistently found to have high rates of comorbidity with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). The purpose of this study is to compare the severity of TD only to TD with comorbid OCD or ADHD based on severity of tics, measures of psychopathology and additional comorbid diagnoses. Baseline data from 158 youth with a chronic TD who participated in two longitudinal studies were examined. Fifty-three percent (N = 85) of the youth also met criteria for a diagnosis of OCD, 38.6 % (n = 61) met criteria for ADHD and 24.1 % (N = 38) met criteria for both. Measures of interest addressed severity of tics, symptoms of anxiety, depression, ADHD, psychosocial stress, global functioning and the presence of comorbid diagnoses. Youth with comorbid TD and OCD were characterized by more severe tics, increased levels of depressive and anxious symptoms, heightened psychosocial stress and poorer global functioning. Youth with comorbid TD and ADHD did not differ from those with TD alone on measures of tic severity, but experienced greater psychosocial stress and poorer global functioning. Subjects with comorbid TD and OCD had more internalizing disorders than those without OCD, while those with comorbid ADHD were more likely to meet criteria for oppositional defiant disorder. TD with OCD is a more severe subtype of TD than TD without OCD. TD with ADHD is associated with higher psychosocial stress and more externalizing behaviors. Further research is needed into the underlying relationships between these closely associated conditions.