Androgen receptor expression in circulating tumour cells from castration-resistant prostate cancer patients treated with novel endocrine agents

Background:

Abiraterone and enzalutamide are novel endocrine treatments that abrogate androgen receptor (AR) signalling in castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). Here, we developed a circulating tumour cells (CTCs)-based assay to evaluate AR expression in real-time in CRPC and investigated nuclear AR expression in CTCs in patients treated with enzalutamide and abiraterone.

Methods:

CTCs were captured and characterised using the CellSearch system. An automated algorithm to identify CTCs and quantify AR expression was employed. The primary aim was to evaluate the association between CTC AR expression and prior treatment with abiraterone or enzalutamide.

Results:

AR expression in CTCs was evaluated in 94 samples from 48 metastatic CRPC patients. We observed large intra-patient heterogeneity of AR expression in CTCs. Prior exposure to abiraterone or enzalutamide was not associated with a change in CTCs AR expression (median intensity and distribution of AR-positive classes). In support of this, we also confirmed maintained nuclear AR expression in tissue samples collected after progression on abiraterone. AR staining also identified additional AR-positive CD45-negative circulating cells that were CK-negative/weak and therefore missed using standard protocols. The number of these events correlated with traditional CTCs and was associated with worse outcome on univariate analysis.

Conclusions:

We developed a non-invasive method to monitor AR nuclear expression in CTCs. Our studies confirm nuclear AR expression in CRPC patients progressing on novel endocrine treatments. Owing to the significant heterogeneity of AR expression in CTCs, studies in larger cohorts of patients are required to identify associations with outcome.     

Androgen receptor coregulators and their involvement in the development and progression of prostate cancer

The androgen receptor signaling axis plays an essential role in the development, function and homeostasis of male urogenital structures including the prostate gland although the mechanism by which the AR axis contributes to the initiation, progression and metastatic spread of prostate cancer remains somewhat enigmatic. A number of molecular events have been proposed to act at the level of the AR and associated coregulators to influence the natural history of prostate cancer including deregulated expression, somatic mutation, and post-translational modification. The purpose of this article is to review the evidence for deregulated expression and function of the AR and associated coactivators and corepressors and how such events might contribute to the progression of prostate cancer by controlling the selection and expression of AR targets.     

抗雄激素药物治疗去势抵抗型前列腺癌的机制研究进展

去势抵抗型前列腺癌（castration-resistant prostate cancer ,CRPC）是指经内分泌治疗产生耐药并继续发展的致命性前列腺癌,雄激素受体（androgen receptor,AR）激活途径仍是这一阶段前列腺癌发展的驱动机制,因此抗雄激素治疗仍然是重要的治疗手段之一。虽然许多新型抗雄激素治疗药物在临床治疗中显示了显著的疗效,但同时耐药也频繁出现。本文就近年来几种主要抗雄激素治疗药物的作用及相应的耐药机制进行综述。     

Androgen receptor: role and novel therapeutic prospects in prostate cancer

Androgen receptor (AR) signaling is necessary for the development of prostate cancer. Androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) for prostate cancer was described over 50 years ago and ADT remains the mainstay of systemic therapy. AR signaling remains intact as the disease evolves to castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). Through cellular adaptations, CRPC continues to rely on androgens and AR growth signaling, and thus AR remains an important therapeutic target. CRPC cells upregulate enzymes used in androgen synthesis, thus providing an intracellular source of androgen despite systemic castration. Compounds in development, such as antiandrogens, lyase inhibitors, heat-shock protein-90 inhibitors, histone deacetylase inhibitors and others, will provide new tools to more effectively reduce ligand, inhibit AR and/or inhibit costimulatory pathways and result in improved clinical outcomes.     

Androgen receptor gene amplification and protein expression in hormone refractory prostate cancer

This study examined androgen receptor (AR) gene amplification and protein expression in 102 matched paired hormone sensitive and resistant tumours from 51 patients. AR gene amplification and X chromosome copy number were assessed by fluorescent in situ hybridisation, and protein expression was assessed by immunohistochemistry. All tumours were stained for PSA protein expression. Significantly more tumours exhibited AR amplification following the development of hormone resistance (20%, 10 out of 49) compared to matched hormone-sensitive tumours from the same patient (2%, one out of 48) (P=0.0085). The level of AR expression was significantly higher in hormone-resistant tumours compared to matched hormone-sensitive tumours from the same patient (130, interquartile range, 55-167 vs 94.5 interquartile range, 55-120, P=0.019). AR expression levels in hormone-resistant tumours with and without AR amplification were not significantly different. However, an increase in AR expression was seen with the development of AR amplification in paired tumours. The rate of AR gene amplification and/or an increase in AR protein expression during androgen resistant is too low to wholly explain the development of androgen resistance. Alternative mechanisms for modulating the function of the AR, or other signalling pathways, must be considered as key factors in the development of hormone-resistant prostate.     

CIP2A is a candidate therapeutic target in clinically challenging prostate cancer cell populations

Residual androgen receptor (AR)-signaling and presence of cancer stem-like cells (SCs) are the two emerging paradigms for clinically challenging castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). Therefore, identification of AR-target proteins that are also overexpressed in the cancer SC population would be an attractive therapeutic approach.Our analysis of over three hundred clinical samples and patient-derived prostate epithelial cultures (PPECs), revealed Cancerous inhibitor of protein phosphatase 2A (CIP2A) as one such target. CIP2A is significantly overexpressed in both hormone-naïve prostate cancer (HN-PC) and CRPC patients. CIP2A is also overexpressed, by 3- and 30-fold, in HN-PC and CRPC SCs respectively. In vivo binding of the AR to the intronic region of CIP2A and its functionality in the AR-moderate and AR-high expressing LNCaP cell-model systems is also demonstrated. Further, we show that AR positively regulates CIP2A expression, both at the mRNA and protein level. Finally, CIP2A depletion reduced cell viability and colony forming efficiency of AR-independent PPECs as well as AR-responsive LNCaP cells, in which anchorage-independent growth is also impaired.These findings identify CIP2A as a common denominator for AR-signaling and cancer SC functionality, highlighting its potential therapeutic significance in the most clinically challenging prostate pathology: castration-resistant prostate cancer.     

雄激素受体在前列腺癌细胞中作用及其靶向治疗的研究进展

雄激素受体(androgen receptor, AR)在前列腺癌的发生发展中扮演重要角色。雄激素剥夺疗法(androgen deprivationtherapy, ADT)早期可成功抑制肿瘤的生长, 但最终导致肿瘤复发并进入激素抵抗阶段。AR对前列腺癌基质细胞起促进肿瘤增殖和转移作用, 是上皮腔样细胞的存活因子, 而对肿瘤干细胞样细胞及上皮基底细胞的增殖起抑制作用, AR在不同类型细胞中的不同作用向当前ADT传统的疗法提出挑战, 为发展新的治疗策略提供理论依据。目前以AR为靶点的靶向治疗药物研发也取得一些进展。本文就AR在前列腺癌不同类型细胞中的作用及靶向治疗方面的进展加以综述。      

Leading causes of castration-resistant prostate cancer

Prostate cancer (PCa) is the second leading cause of cancer-related death in men. Androgen receptor has a key role in the initiation and progression of PCa. Currently, androgen deprivation therapy is the standard treatment for PCa patients due to its effective suppression of androgen receptor signaling. Even though androgen deprivation therapy shows its initial effectiveness on shrinking tumor size, it eventually fails to cure advanced PCa, which is determined by the occurrence of castration-resistance. In this review, we summarize the widely accepted mechanisms that account for castration-resistant PCa and discuss potential therapeutic targets.     

Adaptive responses of androgen receptor signaling in castration-resistant prostate cancer

Prostate Cancer (PCa) is an important age-related disease being the most common cancer malignancy and the second leading cause of cancer mortality in men in Western countries. Initially, PCa progression is androgen receptor (AR)- and androgen-dependent. Eventually advanced PCa reaches the stage of Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (CRPC), but remains dependent on AR, which indicates the importance of AR activity also for CRPC. Here, we discuss various pathways that influence the AR activity in CRPC, which indicates an adaptation of the AR signaling in PCa to overcome the treatment of PCa. The adaptation pathways include interferences of the normal regulation of the AR protein level, the expression of AR variants, the crosstalk of the AR with cytokine tyrosine kinases, the Src-Akt-, the MAPK-signaling pathways and AR corepressors. Furthermore, we summarize the current treatment options with regard to the underlying molecular basis of the common adaptation processes of AR signaling that may arise after the treatment with AR antagonists, androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) as well as for CRPC, and point towards novel therapeutic strategies. The understanding of individualized adaptation processes in PCa will lead to individualized treatment options in the future.     

Androgen Receptor Roles in Benign and Malignant Prostate Disease

Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), which aims to reduce androgen-androgen receptor (AR) signaling, is the normal method of prostate cancer treatment. Despite its early success in suppressing prostate tumor growth, the therapy eventually fails, leading to recurrent hormone-refractory tumor growth. Recent studies have been carried out with stromal cell-specific or fibroblastspecific AR knockout mice or prostate stromal-specific and epithelial-specific AR knockout transgenic mice prostate cancer models and in vitro and in vivo studies of various human prostate cancer cells with knock-in and knock-out of the AR. These have indicated that the AR in prostatic stroma acts as a proliferation stimulator and survival factor, whereas epithelial AR acts as a survival factor for epithelial luminal cells and stromal smooth muscle cell differentiation, and as a suppressor for epithelial basal intermediate cell proliferation. These two opposite roles of the stromal and epithelial AR pose a major challenge for ADT and should be taken into account when developing new therapies targeting AR in selective cells.     

The safety and efficacy of enzalutamide in the treatment of advanced prostate cancer

Introduction: Enzalutamide – a non-steroidal second-generation antiandrogen – represents an active treatment option for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) in both chemotherapy-naïve and docetaxel-pretreated settings, based on the demonstration of improved overall survival over placebo in two large phase III trials.

Areas covered: The therapeutic landscape of mCRPC, narrowed to docetaxel until recently, encompasses now several treatments of a different nature (including androgen receptor targeting agents, taxanes, radiometabolic therapy, and immunotherapy), improving considerably the patients prognosis. However, direct comparisons between these agents still lack, raising the question of the optimal sequence of treatment.

Expert commentary: We described in detail available data on clinical efficacy and safety of enzalutamide in different clinical settings (chemotherapy-naïve and -pretreated mCRPC patients), analyzing patients characteristics, the effects of enzalutamide on major clinical outcomes and its impact on patients quality of life. Finally, we briefly overviewed ongoing clinical trials evaluating potential active combinations, cross-resistance with other compounds, sequential strategies, and possible prognostic or predictive biomarkers.     

Androgen receptor non-nuclear regulation of prostate cancer cell invasion mediated by Src and matriptase

Castration-resistant prostate cancers still depend on nuclear androgen receptor (AR) function despite their lack of dependence on exogenous androgen. Second generation anti-androgen therapies are more efficient at blocking nuclear AR; however resistant tumors still develop. Recent studies indicate Src is highly active in these resistant tumors. By manipulating AR activity in several different prostate cancer cell lines through RNAi, drug treatment, and the use of a nuclear-deficient AR mutant, we demonstrate that androgen acting on cytoplasmic AR rapidly stimulates Src tyrosine kinase via a non-genomic mechanism. Cytoplasmic AR, acting through Src enhances laminin integrin-dependent invasion. Active Matriptase, which cleaves laminin, is elevated within minutes after androgen stimulation, and is subsequently shed into the medium. Matriptase activation and shedding induced by cytoplasmic AR is dependent on Src. Concomitantly, CDCP1/gp140, a Matriptase and Src substrate that controls integrin-based migration, is activated. However, only inhibition of Matriptase, but not CDCP1, suppresses the AR/Src-dependent increase in invasion. Matriptase, present in conditioned medium from AR-stimulated cells, is sufficient to enhance invasion in the absence of androgen. Thus, invasion is stimulated by a rapid but sustained increase in Src activity, mediated non-genomically by cytoplasmic AR, leading to rapid activation and shedding of the laminin protease Matriptase.     

Androgen deprivation and cognition in prostate cancer

Androgen deprivation (AD) is commonly used in neoadjuvant and adjuvant setting with prostate cancer (PC) radiotherapy. This prospective study assessed whether cognitive functioning is impaired during 12 months of AD therapy. Longitudinal testing of 25 patients treated with AD and curative radiotherapy was undertaken at baseline, and at 6 and 12 months. CogniSpeed software was used for measuring attentional performances. Other cognitive performances were evaluated using verbal, visuomotor and memory tests. The Beck depression inventory was employed to evaluate depressive mood and EORTC QLQ-C30 for quality of life (QoL). During longitudinal testing of the AD group, no impairment in cognitive performances was found. Instead, improvement was observed in object recall (immediate, P=0.035; delayed, P<0.001), and in semantic memory (P=0.037). In QoL, impairment in physical function was observed. Androgen deprivation of 12 months appears to be associated with preserved cognitive functioning, although physical impairment occurs. These results have implications for counseling and psychosocial support of patients in the context of treatment options in PC.     

Androgen metabolism in prostate cancer: from molecular mechanisms to clinical consequences

Despite our most vigorous efforts, prostate cancer remains the second leading cause of cancer death in men. Understanding the intricacies of androgen metabolism is vital to finding therapeutic targets, particularly with progression of advanced prostate cancer after initial hormone therapy, where adrenal precursors are involved. Such is the case with castration-resistant prostate cancer, where adrenal androgens, for example, dehydroepiandrosterone, are a source for intratumoural synthesis of dihydrotestosterone. As prostate cancer progresses, androgen metabolism changes due to altered expression of steroidogenic enzymes and mutations in the components of the steroidogenic machinery. These alterations sustain disease and allow progression; mechanistically, they may also enable development of hormone therapy resistance. With the development of the newer agents, abiraterone acetate and enzalutamide, efforts have been made to better define the basis for response and resistance. This work can be carried out in cell lines, animal models, as well as with ex vivo analysis of tissues obtained from patients. Efforts to further elucidate the finer details of the steroidogenic pathway are necessary to move toward a curative paradigm for patients with localised disease at high risk for recurrence.     

Androgen deprivation therapy increases cardiovascular morbidity in men with prostate cancer

BACKGROUND: The use of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in the treatment of men with prostate cancer has risen sharply. Although cardiovascular disease is the most common reason for death among men with prostate cancer who do not die of the disease itself, data regarding the effect of ADT on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in men with prostate cancer are limited. In the current study, the authors attempted to measure the risk for subsequent cardiovascular morbidity in men with prostate cancer who received ADT. METHODS: A cohort of newly diagnosed men in a population-based registry who were diagnosed between 1992 and 1996 were identified retrospectively. A total of 22,816 subjects were identified after exclusion criteria were applied. Using a multivariate model, the authors calculated the risk of subsequent cardiovascular morbidity in men with prostate cancer who were treated with ADT, as defined using Medicare claims. RESULTS: Newly diagnosed prostate cancer patients who received ADT for at least 1 year were found to have a 20% higher risk of serious cardiovascular morbidity compared with similar men who did not receive ADT. Subjects began incurring this higher risk within 12 months of treatment. However, Hispanic men were found to have a lowered risk for cardiovascular morbidity. CONCLUSIONS: ADT is associated with significantly increased cardiovascular morbidity in men with prostate cancer and may lower overall survival in men with low-risk disease. These data have particular relevance to decisions regarding the use of ADT in men with prostate cancer in settings in which the benefit has not been clearly established. For men with metastatic disease, focused efforts to reduce cardiac risk factors through diet, exercise, or the use of lipid-lowering agents may mitigate some of the risks of ADT.     

Darolutamide is a potent androgen receptor antagonist with strong efficacy in prostate cancer models

Darolutamide is a novel androgen receptor (AR) antagonist with a distinct chemical structure compared to other AR antagonists and currently in clinical Phase 3 trials for prostate cancer. Using cell-based transactivation assays, we demonstrate that darolutamide, its diastereomers and its main metabolite keto-darolutamide are strong, competitive antagonists for AR wild type, and also for several mutants identified in prostate cancer patients for which other AR antagonists show reduced antagonism or even agonism. Darolutamide, its two diastereomers and main metabolite are also strong antagonists in assays measuring AR N/C interaction and homodimerization. Molecular modeling suggests that the flexibility of darolutamide allows accommodation in the W742C/L mutated AR ligand-binding pocket while for enzalutamide the loss of the important hydrophobic interaction with W742 leads to reduced AR interaction. This correlates with an antagonistic pattern profile of coregulator recruitment for darolutamide. In vitro efficacy studies performed with androgen-dependent prostate cancer cell lines show that darolutamide strongly reduces cell viability and potently inhibits spheroid formation. Also, a marked down-regulation of androgen target genes paralleled by decreased AR binding to gene regulatory regions is seen. In vivo studies reveal that oral dosing of darolutamide markedly reduces growth of the LAPC-4 cell line-derived xenograft and of the KuCaP-1 patient-derived xenograft. Altogether, these results substantiate a unique antagonistic profile of darolutamide and support further development as a prostate cancer drug.     

Androgen receptor axis-targeted agents are not superior to conventional hormonal therapy for treatment of metastatic prostate cancer

The present study aimed to use real-world Japanese data to compare the treatment outcome of conventional hormonal therapy to that of using androgen receptor axis-targeted (ARAT) agents for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. The overall survival between the conventional hormonal therapy group and the ARAT agent therapy group was compared using a group of 75 Japanese patients who were treated for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. A subgroup analysis was carried out and the risk factors that affected overall survival (OS) were determined. The median OS from the time of prostate-specific antigen recurrence was 73.1 months in the ARAT group and 45.2 months in the conventional treatment group (P=0.414). Although OS tended to be slightly longer in the ARAT group, the difference between the groups was not significant. Subgroup analysis suggested that the therapeutic outcome of using ARAT agents tended to be less beneficial in patients who were older, and in those with a higher tumor volume or low Gleason grade. In conclusion, use of ARAT agents did not impart a significant survival benefit to patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer when compared with survival rates in response to conventional therapy. However, there was some clinical benefit when ARAT agents were used after patients developed castration-resistant prostate cancer. These findings suggest that up-front therapy using ARAT agents at the time of the initial hormone therapy can impart clinical benefit in Japanese patients with metastatic prostate cancer.