Immunotherapy opportunities in ovarian cancer

Ovarian cancer is responsible for the majority of gynecologic cancer deaths and despite the highest standard of multimodality therapy with surgery and cytotoxic chemotherapy, long-term survival remains low. With compelling evidence that epithelial ovarian cancer is an immunogenic tumor capable of stimulating an antitumor immune response, renewed efforts to develop immune therapies to augment the efficacy of traditional therapies are underway. Current immunotherapies focus on varied modes of antitumor vaccine development, particularly with the use of dendritic cell vaccines, effective methods for adoptive T-cell transfer and combinatorial approaches with immune modulatory therapy subverting natural tolerance mechanisms or boosting effector mechanisms. Additional combinatorial approaches include the use of cytokines and/or chemotherapy with immune therapy.     

Preconditioning chemotherapy with paclitaxel and cisplatin enhances the antitumor activity of cytokine induced-killer cells in a murine lung carcinoma model

Adoptive cell therapy involving the use of ex vivo generated cytokine-induced killer cells (CIKs) provides a promising approach to immunotherapy. However, the therapeutic activity of CIKs is limited by the immunosuppressive factors active in the host. It has become increasingly apparent that manipulation of the recipient immune system with the preconditioning regimen is essential to guarantee the antitumor effect of subsequent adoptive cell therapy. In our study, paclitaxel (PTX) and cisplatin (DDP) were used as preconditioning drugs combined with CIKs to illustrate the potential mechanisms underlying the synergic antitumor effect against Lewis lung cancer cells in vitro and in vivo. We found that 3LL cells displayed an increased sensitization to CIKs-induced lysis after treatment with PTX or DDP in vitro. Significant inhibition of tumor growth was observed in mice treated with combinatorial chemo-immunotherapy with respect to untreated or single regimen treated ones. Prior chemotherapy markedly enhanced the intratumoral accumulation of CD3(+) T lymphocytes and the homing of CIKs to the spleen and tumor. Moreover, the frequencies of intratumoral and splenic regulatory T cells (Tregs) were significantly decreased after chemotherapy pretreatment. Our findings provide a new rationale for combining immunotherapy and chemotherapy to induce a synergistic antitumor response in patients with lung cancer.     

Targeted therapies to improve tumor immunotherapy

Durable tumor regression and potential cures of metastatic solid cancers can be achieved by a variety of cellular immunotherapy strategies, including cytokine therapy, dendritic cell-based vaccines, and immune-activating antibodies, when used in so-called immune-sensitive cancers such as melanoma and renal cell carcinoma. However, these immunotherapy strategies have very low tumor response rates, usually in the order of 5% to 10% of treated patients. We propose that the antitumor activity of adequately stimulated tumor antigen-specific T cells is limited by local factors within the tumor milieu and that pharmacologic modulation of this milieu may overcome tumor resistance to immunotherapy. By understanding the mechanisms of cancer cell immune escape, it may be possible to design rational combinatorial approaches of novel therapies able to target immunosuppressive or antiapoptotic molecules in an attempt to reverse resistance to immune system control. We term this mode of treatment "immunosensitization." Ideal candidates for immunosensitizing drugs would be targeted drugs that block key oncogenic mechanisms in cancer cells resulting in a proapoptotic cancer cell milieu and at the same time do not negatively interfere with critical lymphocyte functions.     

Immunotherapy in ovarian cancer

Immunotherapy aims to develop combination approaches that simultaneously augment immunity while preventing local immune suppression. Despite advances in combinatorial chemotherapy regimens and the advent of intraperitoneal chemotherapy administration, current therapeutic options for patients with ovarian cancer are inadequate. Advances in immunotherapy offer a promising frontier for treating ovarian tumors. Multiple immunotherapeutic modalities are currently developed and tested in clinical trials. Antibody-based therapies, immune checkpoint blockade, cancer vaccines, and chimeric antigen receptor–modified T cells have demonstrated preclinical success and entered clinical testing. In this review, we discuss these promising immunotherapeutic approaches and emphasize the importance of combinatorial treatment strategies and biomarker discovery.     

The Evolving Role of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Cancer Treatment

Traditional treatment modalities for advanced cancer (radiotherapy, chemotherapy, or targeted agents) act directly on tumors to inhibit or destroy them. Along with surgery, these modalities are predominantly palliative, with toxicity and only modest improvements in survival in patients with advanced solid tumors. Accordingly, long-term survival rates for most patients with advanced cancer remain low, thus there is a need for cancer treatments with favorable benefit and toxicity profiles that can potentially result in long-term survival. The immune system plays a critical role in the recognition and eradication of tumor cells (“immune surveillance”), and immunotherapies based on this concept have been used for decades with some success against a few tumor types; however, most immunotherapies were limited by a lack of either substantial efficacy or specificity, resulting in toxicity. We now have a greater understanding of the complex interactions between the immune system and tumors and have identified key molecules that govern these interactions. This information has revitalized the interest in immunotherapy as an evolving treatment modality using immunotherapeutics designed to overcome the mechanisms exploited by tumors to evade immune destruction. Immunotherapies have potentially complementary mechanisms of action that may allow them to be combined with other immunotherapeutics, chemotherapy, targeted therapy, or other traditional therapies. This review discusses the concepts and data behind immunotherapies, with a focus on the checkpoint inhibitors and their responses, toxicities, and potential for long-term survival, and explores promising single-agent and combination therapies in development.

Implications for Practice:

Immunotherapy is an evolving treatment approach based on the role of the immune system in eradicating cancer. An example of an immunotherapeutic is ipilimumab, an antibody that blocks cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4) to augment antitumor immune responses. Ipilimumab is approved for advanced melanoma and induced long-term survival in a proportion of patients. The programmed death-1 (PD-1) checkpoint inhibitors are promising immunotherapies with demonstrated sustained antitumor responses in several tumors. Because they harness the patient’s own immune system, immunotherapies have the potential to be a powerful weapon against cancer.     

Immune cells and cytokines - their role in cancer-immunotherapy (review)

Conventional cancer therapies such as surgery, chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy, are not always successful in providing long-term survival for cancer patients. One of the major problems with conventional cancer therapies is their inability to eradicate residual/metastatic tumor cells that are resistant to therapy. Therefore, it is necessary to develop new methods for treating such cancer cells in order to improve the clinical outcome of these patients. Despite antitumor effector mechanisms working against cancer cells in the host's body, tumor-cell-induced immunosuppression and or antigenic modulation by the tumor cells often help tumor cells escape host defense mechanisms. Therefore, one approach for treating residual cancer would be to enhance the host's own immunological/antitumor defense mechanisms. Immune cells that have a significant role in mediating antitumor responses include: T lymphocytes; natural killer (NK) cells; macrophages; and B lymphocytes. The ability of these immune cells to effectively destroy malignant cells is carefully governed by chemical mediators in the form of proteins otherwise known as cytokines. Many cytokines (interleukins, interferons, and tumor necrosis factor) have been shown to enhance in vitro and in vivo effector cell antitumor cytotoxic activities. Utilization of cytokines in conjunction with effector cells can also mediate significant antitumor responses in both animal models and cancer patients. One of the major problems associated with systemic treatment with cytokines is the development of dose limiting toxicities. Currently, attempts to reduce this problem include developing techniques to allow for the preferential release of cytokines in proximity to the tumor cell. In this regard, effector cells or tumor cells that have been genetically engineered to secrete cytokine(s) may be useful in localizing an immune response, preferably at the tumor site. Clinical trial using cytokine gene transfected cells for treating cancer are currently under investigation. With the availability of recombinant lymphokines and with our ability to genetically modify effector cells and tumor cells this hopefully will allow us to improve current therapeutic modalities for treating cancer.     

Cancer immunotherapy: A comprehensive appraisal of its modes of application

Conventional cancer treatments such as chemotherapy and radiation therapy have reached their therapeutic potential, leaving a gap for developing more effective cancer therapeutics. Cancer cells evade the immune system using various mechanisms of immune tolerance, underlying the potential impact of immunotherapy in the treatment of cancer. Immunotherapy includes several approaches such as activating the immune system in a cytokine-dependent manner, manipulating the feedback mechanisms involved in the immune response, enhancing the immune response via lymphocyte expansion and using cancer vaccines to elicit long-lasting, robust responses. These techniques can be used as monotherapies or combination therapies. The present review describes the immune-based mechanisms involved in tumor cell proliferation and maintenance and the rationale underlying various treatment methods. In addition, the present review provides insight into the potential of immunotherapy used alone or in combination with various types of therapeutics.     

Immunotherapy as a treatment for biliary tract cancers: A review of approaches with an eye to the future

Biliary tract cancers (BTC) are aggressive malignancies associated with resistance to chemotherapy and poor prognostic rates. Therefore, novel treatment approaches are in need. Immunotherapy represents a promising breakthrough that uses a patient’s immune system to target a tumor. This treatment approach has shown immense progress with positive results for selected cancers such as melanoma and nonsmall cell lung cancer. Initial preclinical data and preliminary clinical studies suggest encouraging mechanistic effects for immunotherapy in BTC offering the hope for an expanding therapeutic role for this disease. These approaches include targeted tumor antigen therapy via peptide and dendritic cell-based vaccines, allogenic cell adoptive immunotherapy, and the use of inhibitory agents targeting the immune checkpoint receptor pathway and multiple components of the tumor microenvironment. At this time demonstrating efficacy in larger clinical trials remains imperative. A multitude of ongoing trials aim to successfully translate mechanistic effects into antitumor efficacy and ultimately aim to incorporate immunotherapy into the routine management of BTC. With further research efforts, the optimization of dosing and therapeutic regimens, the identification of novel tumor antigens and a better understanding of alternative checkpoint pathway receptor expression may provide additional targets for rational combinatorial therapies which enhance the effects of immunotherapy and may offer hope for further advancing treatment options. Ultimately, the challenge remains to prospectively identify the subsets of patients with BTC who may respond to immunotherapy, and devising alternative strategies to sensitize those that do not with the hopes of improving outcomes for all with this deadly disease.     

Emerging role of immunotherapy in the management of prostate cancer

There has been a resurgence of interest in developing noncytotoxic immune therapies for patients with either hormone-naive biochemically relapsed post-primary therapy or castrate metastatic prostate cancer. The rationale for developing an immunotherapeutic approach has been based on the overexpression and underglycosylation of a wide variety of altered "self" molecules including prostate-specific antigen (PSA), acid phosphatase (ACP), prostate stem cell antigen (PSCA), and prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA), which can serve as targets for immune recognition and attack. In addition, such a strategy could theoretically make use of the patient's immune system to fight the tumor particularly if their disease is of reasonably low volume. A variety of immunotherapeutic approaches have been explored through phase I, II, and now phase III trials demonstrating that immunologic tolerance could be broken, as evidenced by the development of hightiter antibodies and T-cell responses specific for the tumor. What appears to be revolutionizing the immunotherapy field is the combination of vaccines with cytokines or immune modulators, which not only potentiate immune reactivity in vivo but foster dramatic antitumor responses. This review explores the challenges now faced in establishing a role for immune therapies for prostate cancer treatment.     

Cancer immunotherapy: Strategies for personalization and combinatorial approaches

The results of recent clinical trials using novel immunotherapy strategies such as immune checkpoint blockade and adoptive T‐cell therapy approaches including CAR T‐cell therapy have clearly established immunotherapy as an important modality for the treatment of cancer besides the traditional approaches of surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy or targeted therapy. However, to date immunotherapy has been shown to induce durable clinical benefit in only a fraction of the patients. The use of combination strategies is likely to increase the number of patients that might benefit from immunotherapy. Indeed, over the last decade, the characterization of multiple immune resistance mechanisms used by the tumor to evade the immune system and the development of agents that target those mechanisms has generated a lot of enthusiasm for cancer immunotherapy. But a critical issue is to determine how best to combine such agents. This review will focus on novel immunotherapy agents currently in development and discuss strategies to develop and personalize combination cancer immunotherapy strategies.     

Chemotherapy pretreatment sensitizes solid tumor-derived cell lines to V alpha 24+ NKT cell-mediated cytotoxicity

There is an increasing awareness of the therapeutic potential for combining immune-based therapies with chemotherapy in the treatment of malignant diseases, but few published studies evaluate possible cytotoxic synergies between chemotherapy and cytotoxic immune cells. Human V alpha 24+/V beta 11+ NKT cells are being evaluated for use in cell-based immunotherapy of malignancy because of their immune regulatory functions and potent cytotoxic potential. In this study, we evaluated the cytotoxicity of combinations of chemotherapy and NKT cells to determine whether there is a potential to combine these treatment modalities for human cancer therapy. The cytotoxicity of NKT cells was tested against solid-tumor derived cell lines NCI-H358, DLD-1, HT-29, DU-145, TSU-Pr1 and MDA-MB231, with or without prior treatment of these target cells, with a range of chemotherapy agents. Low concentrations of chemotherapeutic agents led to sensitization of cell lines to NKT-mediated cytotoxicity, with the greatest effect being observed for prostate cancer cells. Synergistic cytotoxicity occurred in an NKT cell in a dose-dependent manner. Chemotherapy agents induced upregulation of cell surface TRAIL-R2 (DR5) and Fas (CD95) expression, increasing the capacity for NKT cells to recognize and kill via TRAIL- and FasL-mediated pathways. We conclude that administration of cytotoxic immune cells after chemotherapy may increase antitumor activities in comparison with the use of either treatment alone.     

PD-1/PD-L1抑制剂联合治疗在癌症免疫治疗中的研究进展

程序性死亡蛋白-1(programmed cell death-1,PD-1)是一种免疫检查点的负性调控因子,通过与其配体PD-L1/PD-L2结合,抑制T细胞的免疫功能,而PD-1抑制剂则可恢复免疫系统的抗肿瘤作用。较其他治疗手段而言,PD-1抑制剂有显著的临床疗效,然而其仍然存在不足,即目前仍有很大一部分癌症患者对PD-1抑制剂治疗是无效的。研究表明联合治疗可改善PD-1抑制剂单药治疗的有效率。联合治疗包括联合免疫检查点抑制剂、放疗、化疗、癌症疫苗和其他癌症治疗方法。FDA已批准了PD-1抑制剂联合CTLA-4阻断剂治疗,其抗肿瘤效率与肿瘤微环境以及免疫相关因子有关,但关于免疫系统,特别是T细胞对肿瘤阳性响应率的潜在作用机制研究甚少。本文将综述免疫检查点PD-1抑制剂的临床疗效以及其影响因素、作用机制以及PD-1抑制剂联合其他治疗的研究现状。     

肿瘤化疗联合免疫治疗从理论基础到临床实践

在过去的几十年里,化疗是肿瘤内科治疗的基石。尽管化疗疗效显著,但维持病情稳定时间不持久。随着对肿瘤免疫学研究的不断深入,近年来肿瘤免疫治疗再次成为热点。与化疗相比,免疫治疗疗效相对缓和,但更为持久。越来越多的研究表明化疗除了对肿瘤细胞的直接杀伤作用,亦可以增加肿瘤细胞的免疫原性,抑制负性免疫信号,改变肿瘤免疫微环境,从而发挥免疫增强作用,为化疗和免疫治疗的联合应用奠定了理论基础。本文根据已知的肿瘤免疫反应机理和近期发现的化疗免疫调节机制,阐述化疗联合免疫治疗的理论基础,并进一步探讨现有的关于联合治疗的基础和临床研究,从而为后续研究指明方向。      

免疫检查点综合治疗策略的研究进展

免疫治疗的快速发展打破了手术、放化疗以及靶向治疗构成的肿瘤常规治疗模式。与传统肿瘤治疗相比,免疫治疗的疗效更持久,不良反应更小。免疫检查点抑制剂作为免疫治疗的重要组成部分,在临床前及临床试验中已被证实具有广阔的应用前景。然而截至目前,这一疗法所带来的临床获益仅局限于部分肿瘤类型的少部分患者,因此需要合理的综合治疗策略克服这种局限。基因靶向治疗、放疗、化疗、肿瘤疫苗等都可以通过不同机制对免疫系统产生影响,为综合治疗提供了理论依据。本文就免疫检查点治疗及其与其他肿瘤治疗方式联合的综合治疗策略做一综述。      

Synergizing radiation therapy and immunotherapy for curing incurable cancers. Opportunities and challenges

The combination of radiation therapy and immunotherapy holds particular promise as a strategy for cancer therapeutics. Evidence suggests that immunotherapy is most beneficial alone when employed early in the disease process or in combination with standard therapies (eg, radiation) later in the disease process. Indeed, radiation may act synergistically with immunotherapy to enhance immune responses, inhibit immunosuppression, and/or alter the phenotype of tumor cells, thus rendering them more susceptible to immune-mediated killing. As monotherapies, both immunotherapy and radiation may be insufficient to eliminate tumor masses. However, following immunization with a cancer vaccine, the destruction of even a small percentage of tumor cells by radiation could result in crosspriming and presentation of tumor antigens to the immune system, thereby potentiating antitumor responses. Learning how to exploit radiation-induced changes to tumor-cell antigens, and how to induce effective immune responses to these cumulatively immunogenic stimuli, is an exciting frontier in cancer therapy research. This review examines mechanisms by which many forms of radiation therapy can induce or augment antitumor immune responses as well as preclinical systems demonstrating that immunotherapy can be effectively combined with radiation therapy. Finally, we review current clinical trials where standard-of-care radiation therapy is being combined with immunotherapy.     

Personalized cancer vaccination in head and neck cancer

Cancer is characterized by an accumulation of somatic mutations that represent a source of neoantigens for targeting by antigen-specific T cells. Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) has a relatively high mutation burden across all cancer types, and cellular immunity to neoantigens likely plays a key role in HNSCC clinical outcomes. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) have brought new treatment options and hopes to patients with recurrent and/or metastatic HNSCC. However, many patients do not benefit from CPI therapies, highlighting the need for novel immunotherapy or combinatorial strategies. One such approach is personalized cancer vaccination targeting tumor-associated antigens and tumor-specific antigens, either as single agents or in combination with other therapies. Recent advances in next-generation genomic sequencing technologies and computational algorithms have enabled efficient identification of somatic mutation-derived neoantigens and are anticipated to facilitate the development of cancer vaccine strategies. Here, we review cancer vaccine approaches against HNSCC, including fundamental mechanisms of a cancer vaccine, considerations for selecting appropriate antigens, and combination therapies.     

Targeting the tumor microenvironment to enhance antitumor immune responses

The identification of tumor-specific antigens and the immune responses directed against them has instigated the development of therapies to enhance antitumor immune responses. Most of these cancer immunotherapies are administered systemically rather than directly to tumors. Nonetheless, numerous studies have demonstrated that intratumoral therapy is an attractive approach, both for immunization and immunomodulation purposes. Injection, recruitment and/or activation of antigen-presenting cells in the tumor nest have been extensively studied as strategies to cross-prime immune responses. Moreover, delivery of stimulatory cytokines, blockade of inhibitory cytokines and immune checkpoint blockade have been explored to restore immunological fitness at the tumor site. These tumor-targeted therapies have the potential to induce systemic immunity without the toxicity that is often associated with systemic treatments. We review the most promising intratumoral immunotherapies, how these affect systemic antitumor immunity such that disseminated tumor cells are eliminated, and which approaches have been proven successful in animal models and patients.     

Local tumour hyperthermia as immunotherapy for metastatic cancer

Local tumour hyperthermia for cancer treatment is currently used either for ablation purposes as an alternative to surgery or less frequently, in combination with chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy to enhance the effects of those traditional therapies. As it has become apparent that activating the immune system is crucial to successfully treat metastatic cancer, the potential of boosting anti-tumour immunity by heating tumours has become a growing area of cancer research. After reviewing the history of hyperthermia therapy for cancer and introducing methods for inducing local hyperthermia, this review describes different mechanisms by which heating tumours can elicit anti-tumour immune responses, including tumour cell damage, tumour surface molecule changes, heat shock proteins, exosomes, direct effects on immune cells, and changes in the tumour vasculature. We then go over in vivo studies that provide promising results showing that local hyperthermia therapy indeed activates various systemic anti-tumour immune responses that slow growth of untreated tumours. Finally, future research questions that will help bring the use of local hyperthermia as systemic immunotherapy closer to clinical application are discussed.     

CD137, an attractive candidate for the immunotherapy of lung cancer

Immunotherapy has become a hotspot in cancer therapy in recent years. Several immune checkpoints inhibitors have been used to treat lung cancer. CD137 is a kind of costimulatory molecule that mediates T cell activation, which regulates the activity of immune cells in a variety of physiological and pathological processes. Targeting CD137 or its ligand (CD137L) has been studied, aiming to enhance anticancer immune responses. Accumulating studies show that anti‐CD137 mAbs alone or combined with other drugs have bright antitumor prospects. In the following, we reviewed the biology of CD137, the antitumor effects of anti‐CD137 Ab monotherapy and the combined therapy in lung cancer.     

Cancer immunotherapy comes of age

Cancer immunotherapy comprises a variety of treatment approaches, incorporating the tremendous specificity of the adaptive immune system (T cells and antibodies) as well as the diverse and potent cytotoxic weaponry of both adaptive and innate immunity. Immunotherapy strategies include antitumor monoclonal antibodies, cancer vaccines, adoptive transfer of ex vivo activated T and natural killer cells, and administration of antibodies or recombinant proteins that either costimulate immune cells or block immune inhibitory pathways (so-called immune checkpoints). Although clear clinical efficacy has been demonstrated with antitumor antibodies since the late 1990s, other immunotherapies had not been shown to be effective until recently, when a spate of successes established the broad potential of this therapeutic modality. These successes are based on fundamental scientific advances demonstrating the toleragenic nature of cancer and the pivotal role of the tumor immune microenvironment in suppressing antitumor immunity. New therapies based on a sophisticated knowledge of immune-suppressive cells, soluble factors, and signaling pathways are designed to break tolerance and reactivate antitumor immunity to induce potent, long-lasting responses. Preclinical models indicate the importance of a complex integrated immune response in eliminating established tumors and validate the exploration of combinatorial treatment regimens, which are anticipated to be far more effective than monotherapies. Unlike conventional cancer therapies, most immunotherapies are active and dynamic, capable of inducing immune memory to propagate a successful rebalancing of the equilibrium between tumor and host.