Renal and related retroperitoneal abscesses: percutaneous drainage

Renal and related retroperitoneal abscesses cause significant morbidity and mortality and almost always require drainage. The authors report 18 cases of percutaneous drainage of renal and related retroperitoneal abscesses, all of which were successfully managed. In 11 of these cases (61%), percutaneous drainage constituted the only treatment required. In the remaining seven (39%), the patients' clinical status improved after percutaneous drainage, and they were able to undergo subsequent elective nephrectomy with fewer complications. These results are comparable to those achieved with percutaneous abdominal abscess drainage and justify the use of percutaneous drainage for renal and related retroperitoneal abscesses as the therapeutic procedure of choice.     

Abdominal abscesses associated with enteric fistulas: percutaneous management.

For many years, surgical dictum stated abdominal fistulas should be treated by means of surgical excision. Recent advances in percutaneous techniques have altered this. The authors reviewed 150 consecutive abdominal abscesses drained percutaneously over a 36-month period. Among these, 24 patients were found to have 26 fistulous communications to bowel, the pancreatic duct, or the biliary system. Initial drainage of their abscesses was performed in the hospital, but 17 of 24 patients were discharged with a tube in place and were followed up as outpatients. The duration of drainage ranged from 4 days to 3 months. Fistulas healed in 21 of 24 patients (88%) without surgical intervention. Complications were few and included inadvertent dislodgment requiring tube replacement (two patients) and inadvertent puncture of the transverse colon (one patient). Treatment of abdominal abscesses with fistulas by means of percutaneous methods is reliable and safe. Hospital stay may be minimized with outpatient management after drainage.     

Percutaneous drainage of abscesses in patients with Crohn disease

Up to one-quarter of patients with Crohn disease present with abdominal abscesses at some point in their illnesses, most of which have enteric communication. The efficacy of percutaneous drainage alone vs either a combined percutaneous/surgical approach or a purely surgical approach has not been established. We reviewed the results of percutaneous drainage of nine abscesses in eight patients with Crohn disease. Six of these abscesses communicated with the intestine. Those with enteric communication had temporary palliation, with improved medical status. However, all patients required definitive surgery within 7 weeks of initial drainage. Percutaneous drainage in the three patients without enteric communication resulted in a permanent cure. Our experience with this small series suggests that abscesses that have an enteric communication in patients with Crohn disease can be temporarily palliated by percutaneous drainage. However, use of this technique is unlikely to result in long-term palliation or cure. It appears that abscesses with intestinal communication in Crohn patients can be cured by percutaneous therapy alone.     

Inaccessible Postoperative Abdominal Abscess: Percutaneous Drainage Technique with Puncture of a Sinus Tract

The present report describes percutaneous drainage involving puncture of a sinus tract in 14 patients with inaccessible postoperative abdominal abscesses. In eight patients, a sinus tract formed by a previously placed surgical drain was percutaneously punctured under ultrasound guidance. In six patients, a sinus tract was accessed under fluoroscopic guidance, aiming at an indwelling surgical drain. A drainage catheter was successfully placed into the abscesses in 13 patients (92.9%). Complete resolution of abscesses was documented on follow-up computed tomography. Percutaneous drainage with puncture of a sinus tract may be a feasible and effective treatment for inaccessible postoperative abdominal abscesses.     

Percutaneous drainage of postoperative abdominal abscess with limited accessibility: preexisting surgical drains as alternative access route

PURPOSE: To retrospectively assess the effectiveness and safety of postoperative percutaneous drainage of abdominal abscesses with limited accessibility by using a preexisting surgical drain as an access route. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was approved by the institutional review board, and informed consent was not required. The authors reviewed the medical records of 92 patients (62 male, 30 female; median age, 59 years; age range, 3-79 years) with postoperative abdominal abscesses in whom percutaneous drainage was performed by using surgical drains as an access. Factors evaluated included the location and size of the lesion; time between surgery and the drainage procedure; distance between the lesion and surgical drain; presence of fistula; duration of drainage; type of surgical drain; size, type, and length of drainage catheter; and complications. Technical success was defined as adequate placement of a new drainage catheter into the target abscess. Midterm success was defined as avoidance of surgery or additional percutaneous drainage during the 6 months of follow-up. Univariate analysis and multiple logistic regression analysis were performed to determine factors that affected the technical or midterm success of the procedure. RESULTS: Of 92 postoperative abscesses for which the technique was attempted, 56 (61%) had a subphrenic location and 36 (39%) had a peripancreatic location. Technical success was achieved in 87 of the 92 patients (95%). Technical success was not significantly associated with any of the factors tested. Midterm success was achieved in 75 of the 87 patients (86%) in whom technical success was achieved. Midterm failure showed a statistically significant relationship with the presence of fistula (P = .04). No procedure-related complications were identified. CONCLUSION: Percutaneous drainage by using the surgical drain as an access route is an effective and safe alternative for draining postoperative abdominal abscesses that are less accessible with direct puncture..     

Percutaneous drainage of tubo-ovarian abscesses.

The authors performed percutaneous drainage of 27 tubo-ovarian abscesses (TOAs) in 16 patients in whom medical therapy with triple antibiotics prior to catheter drainage had not been successful. Percutaneous drainage was successful in 15 of 16 patients (94%). One patient underwent total abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy 3 days after catheter placement because of persistent symptoms and lack of drainage from the catheter; at laparotomy, a large infected phlegmon was found. Two patients had recurrent disease at 3 and 4 months after catheter placement. Bilateral salpingectomy was performed in one patient and total abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy in the other. One of these patients had cervical carcinoma, and the other had a long history of recurrent pelvic inflammatory disease and TOAs. The long-term avoidance of surgery was 81.2%. Access routes for catheter drainage were through the anterior abdominal wall for 10 abscesses, through the posterior transgluteal route for 11, and through the transvaginal route for six. Duration of drainage was 1-20 days (mean, 6 days). Complications consisted of transient sciatic pain in two patients and mild bacteremia in one. The results indicate that percutaneous drainage of TOAs is effective in patients in whom medical therapy is not successful.     

Nonsurgical drainage of appendiceal abscesses

Five patients with abdominal abscesses complicating appendicitis were successfully treated by catheter drainage. In two patients, the percutaneous procedure was performed after incomplete surgical drainage; in three patients it was used as the only means of initial drainage. No interval appendectomy was required and no complications were associated with the procedure. Percutaneous management of appendiceal abscesses can be proposed as an alternative to surgical drainage.     

Percutaneous drainage of abdominal abcess

The mortality in undrained abdominal abscesses is high with a mortality rate ranging between 45 and 100%. The outcome in abdominal abscesses, however, has improved due to advances in image guided percutaneous interventional techniques. The main indications for the catheter drainage include treatment or palliation of sepsis associated with an infected fluid collection, and alleviation of the symptoms that may be caused by fluid collections by virtue of their size, like pancreatic pseudocele or lymphocele. The single liver abscesses may be drained with ultrasound guidance only, whereas the multiple abscesses usually require computed tomography (CT) guidance and placement of multiple catheters. The pancreatic abscesses are generally drained routinely and urgently. Non-infected pancreatic pseudocysts may be simply observed unless they are symptomatic or cause problems such as pain or obstruction of the biliary or the gastrointestinal tract. Percutaneous routes that have been described to drain pelvic abscesses include transrectal or transvaginal approach with sonographic guidance, a transgluteal, paracoccygeal-infragluteal, or perineal approach through the greater sciatic foramen with CT guidance. Both the renal and the perirenal abscesses are amenable to percutaneous drainage. Percutaneous drainage provides an effective and safe alternative to more invasive surgical drainage in most patients with psoas abscesses as well.     

Percutaneous drainage of complicated abscesses and fluid collections

The original concept of percutaneous, radiological abscess drainage was confined to well circumscribed, solitary abscesses, that could be reached by a short access avoiding transgression of uninvolved organs or compartments. With increasing experience criteria for percutaneous abscess drainage have been expanded to radiological treatment of pancreatic, periappendiceal, diverticular, interloop and mediastinal abscesses and fluid collections. The authors present their experience with percutaneous treatment of such "complicated" abscesses in 140 patients.     

Percutaneous drainage of abdominal abscesses

Abdominal abscesses carry high morbidity and mortality unless properly drained. In recent years, percutaneous drainage has become an accepted alternative to surgery. A brief overview of diagnostic principles, selection of patients, percutaneous drainage catheters and technique, contraindications, and post-drainage follow-up is presented. In experienced hands, more than 80% of abdominal abscesses can be drained successfully by this method and with lower rates of morbidity, mortality, and complications than by surgery.     

Abscess-fistula association: radiologic recognition and percutaneous management

Thirty-five patients with postoperative enteric and/or biliary fistulae were diagnosed and treated by percutaneous catheter drainage. All were initially considered to have postoperative abdominal abscesses, and the enteric or biliary communications were unrecognized before radiologic intervention. In addition, at the time of initial catheter insertion, only six of the 35 abscesses were recognized as being associated with an underlying fistula. In the other 29 patients the fistulae were found either by clinical follow-up or contrast sinogram after 24-72 hr of catheter drainage. Percutaneous catheter drainage was the definitive treatment in 28 (80%) of the 35 patients. The seven failures were either from inadequate catheter positioning or inability to treat the primary cause of the fistula (e.g., radiation enteritis, perforated cancer). These data suggest that even abscesses with underlying fistulae, traditionally an indication for surgical intervention, may be successfully managed by percutaneous methods.     

Percutaneous abscess drainage

Literature published in the past year has focused on controversy over the indications for percutaneous abscess drainage, particularly drainage of hepatic, splenic, and renal abscesses. Percutaneous abscess drainage for intra-abdominal abscesses with enteric communication, perivascular abscesses, infected abdominal tumors, tuboovarian abscesses, and pancreatic collections is also reviewed.     

Abscesses in Crohn disease: percutaneous drainage

Fifteen patients with Crohn disease underwent percutaneous catheter drainage of related abdominal abscesses. The abscesses were located in the right lower quadrant (five patients); in the quadratus lumborum and/or iliopsoas muscles (four patients); in the left paracolic gutter (two patients); and in the right gluteal muscles, the liver, the left subphrenic space, and the pelvis (one patient each). All abscesses were evacuated successfully (n = 15 of 15), and no patient required surgery for abscess drainage. Existing fistulas closed in four of seven patients; the other three patients underwent surgery for excision of diseased bowel and enteric fistulas. No patient developed an enterocutaneous fistula as a result of catheter drainage. Percutaneous abscess drainage is effective for abscesses related to Crohn disease and should be regarded as the procedure of choice. An operation for the abscess can be avoided, and early results suggest that bowel surgery may be obviated in selected patients.     

Computed tomography-guided percutaneous drainage of right upper abdominal abscesses

Definitive computed tomography-guided percutaneous drainage of right upper abdominal abscesses was performed in eight patients (11 procedures). A lateral perpendicular approach was used in all cases. An Argyl trocar catheter was used in nine procedures and a pigtail catheter in two. The drainage was successful in seven patients. In one patient no drainable abscess was found. Percutaneous abdominal abscess drainage should be considered a satisfactory alternative to surgical drainage in poor-risk patients as well as in patients who have had repeated operations in whom any further surgery may be unduly difficult.     

Percutaneous drainage of abdominal abscesses

Percutaneous puncture with echographic guide was performed in 37 patients with suspected abdominal abscesses. The abscess has been confirmed in 31 cases and it has been related to previous surgery in 21. In 3 cases the 3 small cavities were evacuated by a single-stage aspiration; in the other cases different drainage catheters, in relation to the size and the content of the cavities have been employed. Benefits of proteolytic agents, irrigation with saline solution and permanent aspiration are stressed. Successful drainage avoiding surgery was achieved in 23/31 patients (74%), and positive results have been obtained in multiple abscesses, multilocular abscesses and infected haematomas as well. A partial success was achieved in 3 cases (10%): the patients were submitted to surgery after a clinical improvement. Two complications occurred (bowel perforation and small liver laceration). The percutaneous drainage turned out to be a technique of choice in the great majority of abdominal abscesses, and should be considered a good alternative to surgery, particularly in high risk patients.     

Percutaneous abscess drainage in Crohn's disease

The effect of 18 percutaneous abscess drainage procedures on the clinical management of 10 patients with Crohn's disease was evaluated. Two abscesses occurred immediately after surgery (two patients), five were in the liver (three patients), and 11 were the result of direct spread of disease from adjacent transmural bowel involvement (seven patients). Both postoperative and all five hepatic abscesses were treated successfully with percutaneous drainage. In two of the seven patients with abscesses secondary to transmural bowel disease, percutaneous drainage resulted in resolution of the abscess without the need for any further surgical intervention. The remaining five patients had subsequent elective intestinal surgery in which a single-stage surgical resection and primary reanastomosis were performed successfully. Two of these patients had abscesses recur at the same location, prompting a repeat percutaneous drainage before surgery. No enterocutaneous fistulas secondary to percutaneous drainage developed in any of the 10 patients. These results indicate that percutaneous abscess drainage can be a valuable technique for treating abscesses that result as a complication of Crohn's disease.     

Recurrent abdominal and pelvic abscesses: incidence, results of repeated percutaneous drainage, and underlying causes in 956 drainages

OBJECTIVE: We undertook this study to determine the incidence and results of repeated (secondary) percutaneous abscess drainage performed on recurrent abscesses after successful initial (primary) percutaneous abscess drainage. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Imaging studies from patients who underwent multiple drainages were reviewed to define a cohort of patients who underwent secondary percutaneous abscess drainage after successful initial percutaneous abscess drainage of the same abscess. Medical records of these patients were then reviewed to assess the results of secondary percutaneous abscess drainage. RESULTS: Forty-five abscesses in 43 patients required secondary percutaneous abscess drainage. Twenty-four of the 43 patients avoided surgery. Secondary percutaneous abscess drainage was successful in evacuating the abscess cavity in 39 (91%) of 43 patients. Duration of drainage and time until recurrence were not significant predictors for avoiding surgery. Mean duration of secondary percutaneous abscess drainage was significantly longer than mean duration of primary percutaneous abscess drainage, but duration of secondary percutaneous abscess drainage (25 vs 14 days, respectively; p = 0.007) did not differ significantly between patients who ultimately required surgery and those who did not (17 vs 11 days, respectively; p = 0.10). Time to recurrence ranged from 2 days to 1 year (mean, 51 days). CONCLUSION: After successful primary percutaneous abscess drainage, secondary percutaneous abscess drainage of recurrent abscesses succeeded in evacuating the abscess cavity in most patients, and surgery was avoided by slightly more than half. Patients with postoperative abscesses were significantly more likely to avoid surgery (p = 0.008), whereas patients with pancreatic abscesses were significantly more likely to require it (p = 0.03).     

Percutaneous Transhepatic Drainage of Inaccessible Abdominal Abscesses Following Abdominal Surgery Under Real-Time CT-Fluoroscopic Guidance

This study evaluated the safety, feasibility, and clinical utility of transhepatic drainage of inaccessible abdominal abscesses retrospectively under real-time computed tomographic (CT) guidance. For abdominal abscesses, 12 consecutive patients received percutaneous transhepatic drainage. Abscesses were considered inaccessible using the usual access route because they were surrounded by the liver and other organs. The maximum diameters of abscesses were 4.6–9.5 cm (mean, 6.7 ± 1.4 cm). An 8-Fr catheter was advanced into the abscess cavity through the liver parenchyma using real-time CT fluoroscopic guidance. Safety, feasibility, procedure time, and clinical utility were evaluated. Drainage catheters were placed with no complications in abscess cavities through the liver parenchyma in all patients. The mean procedure time was 18.8 ± 9.2 min (range, 12–41 min). All abscesses were drained. They shrank immediately after catheter placement. In conclusions, this transhepatic approach under real-time CT fluoroscopic guidance is a safe, feasible, and useful technique for use of drainage of inaccessible abdominal abscesses.     

Percutaneous drainage of a psoas abscess in a young child

Percutaneous drainage of abdominal and retroperitoneal abscesses has become a widely practiced alternative to surgery in selected patients. Although such techniques and results have been widely reported in adults, these series do not include reports of percutaneous drainage of a psoas abscess in a young child to emphasize that interventional radiologic techniques can be effective even in very young children.     

Percutaneous drainage of periappendiceal abscesses: review of 20 patients

Twenty patients with periappendiceal abscesses diagnosed by CT underwent percutaneous catheter drainage. Eighteen (90%) of the 20 patients were successfully treated by percutaneous drainage and antibiotic therapy alone. In two of these patients, however, small recurrent abscesses were diagnosed by CT 4 and 6 weeks after drainage, but these abscesses resolved with additional antibiotic therapy. Surgery was performed in two patients in whom percutaneous drainage failed. One was a diabetic patient who had a gas-forming abscess that extended into the posterior pararenal space. Surgery was necessary in a second patient because of a technical failure of catheter insertion, which resulted in perforation of the abscess cavity and peritonitis. Abscess sinograms in eight (44%) of 18 patients showed fistulas between the abscess cavity and the base of the cecum or appendix. However, the fistulas did not pose a problem in clinical management, and all closed within 14 days. Percutaneous drainage is an effective alternative to surgery in selected patients with periappendiceal abscesses.