The influence of supplementary tibial fixation on laxity measurements after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring tendons in female patients

BACKGROUND: Female patients undergoing arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with a hamstring tendon graft developed increased postoperative laxity compared to male and female patients who had reconstruction using a patellar tendon graft. This difference may be due to graft slippage in less dense female tibial bone. HYPOTHESIS: Reinforcement of tibial fixation of the hamstring tendon graft in women by supplementary methods may reduce laxity. STUDY DESIGN: Randomized controlled clinical trial; Level of evidence, 2. METHODS: Fifty-six female patients divided into 2 groups (standard tibial fixation with 7 x 25-mm metal interference screw versus metal interference screw with supplementary staple fixation) were followed for 2 years. RESULTS: After 2 years, the mean side-to-side difference using KT-1000 arthrometer manual maximum measurements was 1.8 mm (standard group) and 1.1 mm (staple group) (P=.05). The percentage of patients with a side-to-side difference of <3 mm did not differ significantly between the 2 groups (P=.66): 88.8% of the standard group versus 90.5% of the staple group. A grade 0 Lachman test result was present in 63% of the standard group and 86% of the staple group (P=.04). Kneeling pain was experienced by 7% of the standard group and 29% of the staple group (P=.05). CONCLUSIONS: Supplementary tibial fixation in female patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring tendon graft in addition to a single-size screw significantly improves laxity measurements and clinical stability assessment 2 years after surgery. However, this improvement is at the cost of increased kneeling pain.     

Clinical outcome of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with quadrupled hamstring tendon graft and bioabsorbable interference screw fixation

BACKGROUND: To date, there has been no publication of clinical follow-up data on patients who have undergone quadrupled hamstring tendon autograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with bioabsorbable screw fixation. PURPOSE: To report the results of quadrupled hamstring tendon autograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with bioabsorbable interference screw fixation. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review. METHODS: Sixty-five patients (66 knees) were retrospectively identified by chart review as having undergone quadrupled hamstring tendon autograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with bioabsorbable interference screw fixation with a minimum 2-year follow-up. RESULTS: Data were collected on 48 knees in 47 patients (73%) at an average 30.2 months (range, 24 to 43) after surgery. Thirty-six patients (37 knees) returned for clinical evaluation (56% return) and subjective follow-up only was obtained in 11 patients (17%). The mean Lysolm knee score was 91 (range, 45 to 98), with a mean of 97 for the uninvolved knee. The mean Tegner activity score was 5.7 (range, 3 to 7). The KT-1000 arthrometer mean side-to-side difference for manual maximum displacement was 2.03 mm (range, -1 to 8). The mean International Knee Documentation Committee knee score was 83 (range, 47 to 100). Patients who underwent associated partial meniscectomy or meniscal repair had significantly lower International Knee Documentation Committee scores than patients without associated procedures (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Quadrupled hamstring tendon autograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with bioabsorbable interference screw fixation is comparable with other methods of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in terms of patient satisfaction, knee stability, and function.     

The influence of reverse-thread screw femoral fixation on laxity measurements after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring tendon

In arthroscopically assisted anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using hamstring tendon graft, the graft rotates slightly as the femoral screw is inserted. Its final position tends to be in the anterior half of the tunnel in right knees, resulting in clinical laxity. To perform identical procedures on left and right knees, a reverse-thread screw was designed for femoral fixation in right knees. We prospectively studied 80 patients undergoing right-knee anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring tendon autograft. Thirty-six patients underwent reconstruction with a standard screw and 44 underwent reconstruction with a reverse-thread screw. The same technique, performed by the same surgeon, was used on all patients. At 12 months' follow-up, the average side-to-side differences on arthrometry testing were 2.00 mm for the standard screw group and 0.95 mm for the reverse-thread screw group using a manual maximum test, and 1.66 mm and 1.00 mm, respectively, using the 20-pound test. Both differences were statistically significant. Of the standard group, 23% had a manual maximum difference of 3 mm or more, compared with 8% of the reverse-thread group. A significant difference was found between these two groups for Lachman test (77% with grade 0 for the standard group compared with 92% for the reverse group) but pivot shift and Lysholm knee score were not significantly different. The use of a reverse-thread screw for femoral fixation in right-knee anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions in men significantly decreased laxity at 12 months after surgery compared with standard screw fixation.     

Arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a metaanalysis comparing patellar tendon and hamstring tendon autografts

BACKGROUND: The best choice of graft tissue for use in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction has been the subject of debate. HYPOTHESIS: Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with patellar tendon autograft leads to greater knee stability than reconstruction with hamstring tendon autograft. STUDY DESIGN: Metaanalysis. METHODS: A Medline search identified articles published from January 1966 to May 2000 describing arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with either patellar tendon or hamstring tendon autograft and with a minimum patient follow-up of 24 months. RESULTS: There were 1348 patients in the patellar tendon group (21 studies) and 628 patients in the hamstring tendon group (13 studies). The rate of graft failure in the patellar tendon group was significantly lower (1.9% versus 4.9%) and a significantly higher proportion of patients in the patellar tendon group had a side-to-side difference of less than 3 mm on KT-1000 arthrometer testing than in the hamstring tendon group (79% versus 73.8%). There was a higher rate of manipulation under anesthesia or lysis of adhesions (6.3% versus 3.3%) and of anterior knee pain in the patellar tendon group (17.4% versus 11.5%) and a higher incidence of hardware removal in the hamstring tendon group (5.5% versus 3.1%). CONCLUSIONS: Patellar tendon autografts had a significantly lower rate of graft failure and resulted in better static knee stability and increased patient satisfaction compared with hamstring tendon autografts. However, patellar tendon autograft reconstructions resulted in an increased rate of anterior knee pain.     

Arthroscopic reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. A comparison of patellar tendon autograft and four-strand hamstring tendon autograft.

We compared the outcome of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using hamstring tendon autograft with outcome using patellar tendon autograft at 2 years after surgery. Patients had an isolated anterior cruciate ligament injury and, apart from the grafts, the arthroscopic surgical technique was identical. Prospective assessment was performed on 90 patients with isolated anterior cruciate ligament injury undergoing reconstruction with a patellar tendon autograft; 82 were available for follow-up. The hamstring tendon autograft group consisted of the next 90 consecutive patients fulfilling the same criteria; 85 were available for follow-up. Clinical review included the Lysholm and International Knee Documentation Committee scores, instrumented testing, thigh atrophy, and kneeling pain. These methods revealed no difference between the groups in terms of ligament stability, range of motion, and general symptoms. Thigh atrophy was significantly less in the hamstring tendon group at 1 year after surgery, a difference that had disappeared by 2 years. The KT-1000 arthrometer testing showed a slightly increased mean laxity in the female patients in the hamstring tendon graft group. Kneeling pain after reconstruction with the hamstring tendon autograft was significantly less common than with the patellar tendon autograft, suggesting lower donor-site morbidity with hamstring tendon harvest.     

Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring tendon autograft: 5- to 9-year follow-up

BACKGROUND: The results of revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction are limited in the current literature, and no studies have previously documented the outcome of revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using solely hamstring tendon grafts. HYPOTHESIS: Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with 4-strand hamstring tendon graft affords acceptable results and is comparable to reported outcomes with the bone-patellar tendon-bone graft. STUDY DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: Fifty-seven consecutive revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions with the hamstring tendon graft and interference screw fixation were assessed a mean time of 89 months (range, 60-109 months) after surgery. Assessment included the International Knee Documentation Committee knee ligament evaluation, instrumented laxity testing, and radiologic examination. RESULTS: Of the 50 knees reviewed, 5 (10%) had objective failure of the revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Of the 45 patients with functional grafts, knee function was normal or nearly normal in 33 patients (73%). An overall grade of normal or nearly normal was found in 56% of patients. The mean side-to-side difference on manual maximum testing was 2.5 mm (range, -1 to 4 mm). Degenerative changes on radiographs were identified in 23% of patients at the time of surgery, increasing to 56% of patients at review. The status of the articular cartilage at the time of revision surgery was the most significant contributor to successful outcome. CONCLUSION: Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring tendon graft and interference screw fixation affords acceptable results at a minimum of 5 years' follow-up. Good objective results can be obtained, but subjectively, the results appear inferior to those of primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the literature, which may be related to the high incidence of articular surface damage in this patient population. We recommend that, when available, hamstring tendon autografts should be considered for revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.     

A prospective randomized study of patellar versus hamstring tendon autografts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

BACKGROUND: Bone-patellar tendon-bone graft has been the most commonly used graft material in anterior cruciate reconstructions, but there has been increasing use of hamstring tendon grafts. However, no existing clinical studies show adequate support for the choice of one graft over the other. HYPOTHESIS: Hamstring tendons are equally as good as patellar tendon in anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective randomized clinical trial. METHODS: Ninety-nine patients with laxity caused by a torn anterior cruciate ligament underwent arthroscopically assisted reconstruction with graft randomization according to their birth year. Grafts were either bone-patellar tendon-bone with metal interference screw fixation or double-looped hamstring tendons with metal plate fixation. There were no significant differences between the two groups preoperatively or at operation. Standard rehabilitation included immediate postoperative mobilization without a knee brace, protected weightbearing for 2 weeks, and return to full activity at 6 to 12 months. RESULTS: Forty-three patients in the patellar tendon group and 46 patients in the hamstring tendon group were available for clinical evaluation at a minimum of 21 months after surgery. No statistically significant differences were seen with respect to clinical and instrumented laxity testing, International Knee Documentation Committee Score ratings, isokinetic muscle torque measurements, and Kujala patellofemoral, Lysholm, and Tegner scores. CONCLUSION: Equal results were seen for patellar and hamstring tendon autograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions at 2 years after surgery. Both techniques seem to improve patients' performance.     

Isokinetic and anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstrings or patella tendon graft: analysis of literature

We report isokinetic results of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with patellar tendon or hamstring graft from the literature analysis. The literature was defined from two search "textwords": Isokinetic and Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, and from three databases: Medline, Pascal, and Herasmus. Two independent physicians (Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation) carried out an analysis according to the French National Accreditation and Health Evaluation Agency recommendations. Fifty-three studies were selected: 29 reported isokinetic results after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with patellar tendon graft, 15 reported isokinetic results after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring graft, and 9 studies compared the two surgical procedures. After discussing different bias and in reference to prospective randomised and comparative studies, the anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with patellar tendon graft involves a knee extensors deficit during several months. The hamstring surgical procedure involves a less important knee extensor deficit (from 6 to 19 % against 8 to 21 %). Knee sprain and intra-articular surgery involve a long-lasting knee extensors deficit. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstrings graft involves a knee flexors deficit over several months. The patellar tendon surgical procedure involves a less important knee flexors deficit (from 1 to 15 % against 5 to 17 %). In reference to isokinetic parameters, no difference between the two surgical procedures (patellar tendon graft or hamstring graft) is shown after more than twenty-four post-surgical months.     

Clinical comparison of intraarticular anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using autogenous semitendinosus and gracilis tendons in men versus women

Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament using a hamstring tendon autograft has often been recommended for female athletes. We compared the results of acute, isolated, intraarticular anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions using quadruple-looped hamstring autografts in 39 female and 26 male patients. All reconstructions were performed by the same surgeon using a similar surgical technique and the same postoperative management. In each case, patients had Endobutton femoral fixation and either post or button fixation for the tibial side. The average follow-up was 40.9 months for women and 39.0 months for men. Objective analysis of results included examination for the presence of effusion and crepitus, Lachman and pivot shift testing, and KT-1000 arthrometer testing for side-to-side differences. Subjective analysis consisted of a 15-item visual analog scale completed by patients postoperatively, and pre- and postoperative Tegner and Lysholm scores. The clinical failure rate was 23% (9 of 39) for the female patients and 4% (1 of 26) for the male patients, which was statistically significant. There was also a trend toward increased laxity in female patients. Subjectively, the women also reported a higher frequency and intensity of pain. Based on Tegner activity levels, more of the men returned to their preinjury level of activity than did the women. When compared with the male patients, female patients had a significantly higher failure rate after reconstruction.     

Multistranded hamstring tendon graft fixation with a central four-quadrant or a standard tibial interference screw for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

BACKGROUND: Tibial fixation of hamstring tendon grafts has been the weak link in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. HYPOTHESIS: Use of a central four-quadrant sleeve and screw provides superior fixation when compared with standard interference screw fixation. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: In eight pairs of cadaveric knees each anterior cruciate ligament was reconstructed using either an interference screw or a central sleeve and screw on the tibial side. The specimens were then subjected to cyclic loading followed by a load-to-failure test. RESULTS: The load required to cause 1 and 2 mm of graft laxity, defined as the separation of the femur and the tibia at the points of graft fixation, was significantly greater with the sleeve and screw than with the interference screw (at 2 mm: sleeve and screw, 216.1 +/- 30.1 N; interference screw, 167.0 +/- 33.2 N). The force at initial slippage for each of the graft strands was significantly higher with use of the central sleeve and screw. CONCLUSIONS: The four-quadrant sleeve and screw device may provide greater surface area for healing of hamstring tendon grafts and allow equal tensioning of graft strands before fixation. These factors are associated with increased strength of fixation and reduced laxity of the graft after cyclic loading. Clinical Relevance: Use of the central four-quadrant sleeve and screw system offers increased strength of fixation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring tendon graft.     

A 7-year follow-up of patellar tendon and hamstring tendon grafts for arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: differences and similarities

BACKGROUND: For arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, the most commonly used graft constructs are either the hamstring tendon or patellar tendon. Well-controlled, long-term studies are needed to determine the differences between the 2 materials. HYPOTHESIS: There is a difference between hamstring and patellar tendon grafts in the clinical results of anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions at 7 years. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. METHODS: Two groups of 90 patients each, consecutively treated with hamstring or patellar tendon grafts, were followed and assessed at 1, 2, 5, and 7 years after surgery. RESULTS: At the 7-year review, abnormal radiographic findings were seen in 45% (24/53) of the patellar tendon group and in 14% (7/51) of the hamstring tendon group (P = .002). Although there was no significant difference between the groups in extension deficit (P = .22), the percentage of patients with an extension deficit increased significantly in the patellar tendon group from 8% at 1 year to 25% at 7 years (P = .02). No significant change was seen in the hamstring tendon group over time (P = .20). There was no significant difference in laxity between the groups on Lachman (P = .44), pivot-shift (P = .39), or instrumented (P = .44) testing. Graft rupture occurred in 4 patients from the patellar tendon group and in 9 patients from the hamstring tendon group (P = .15). Both autografts gave excellent subjective results, as evidenced by the International Knee Documentation Committee evaluation and Lysholm knee scores at 7 years. CONCLUSIONS: Both hamstring and patellar tendon grafts provided good subjective outcomes and objective stability at 7 years. No significant differences in the rate of graft rupture or contralateral anterior cruciate ligament rupture were identified. Patients with patellar tendon grafts had a greater prevalence of osteoarthritis at 7 years after surgery; therefore, the authors preferred hamstring tendons as the primary graft choice in anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions.     

A prospective, randomized comparison of semitendinosus and gracilis tendon versus patellar tendon autografts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: five-year follow-up

BACKGROUND: There are still controversies about graft selection for primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Prospective randomized long-term studies are needed to determine the differences between the materials. HYPOTHESIS: Five years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, there is a difference between hamstring and patellar tendon grafts in development of degenerative knee joint disease. STUDY DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1. METHODS: From June 1999 to March 2000, 64 patients were included in this prospective study. A single surgeon performed primary arthroscopically assisted anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in an alternating sequence. In 32 patients, anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction was performed with hamstring tendon autograft, whereas in the other 32 patients, anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction was performed with patellar tendon autograft. RESULTS: At the 5-year follow-up, no statistically significant differences were seen with respect to the Lysholm score, clinical and KT-2000 arthrometer laxity testing, anterior knee pain, single-legged hop test, or International Knee Documentation Committee classification results; 23 patients (82%) in the hamstring tendon group and 23 patients (88%) in the patellar tendon group returned to their preinjury activity levels. Graft rupture occurred in 2 patients from the hamstring tendon group (7%) and in 2 patients from the patellar tendon group (8%). Grade B abnormal radiographic findings were seen in 50% (13/26) of patients in the patellar tendon group and in 17% (5/28) of patients in the hamstring tendon group (P = .012). CONCLUSION: Both hamstring and patellar tendon grafts provided good subjective outcomes and objective stability at 5 years. No significant differences in the rate of graft failure were identified. Patients with patellar tendon grafts had a greater prevalence of osteoarthritis at 5 years after surgery.     

Compaction versus extraction drilling for fixation of the hamstring tendon graft in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Initial strength of quadrupled hamstring tendon grafts fixed with titanium interference screws was assessed in 30 pairs of porcine tibiae. Bone tunnels were drilled with either compaction drilling (stepped routers) or conventional extraction drilling (cannulated drill bits). Fifteen pairs of specimens were subjected to a single-cycle load-to-failure test, while the rest underwent a cyclic-loading test to further assess the quality of the fixation. No significant difference between the two drilling techniques was found with regard to yield load, displacement at yield load, stiffness, or mode of failure. Porcine trabecular bone mineral density was determined using peripheral quantitative computed tomography and compared with that of young women and men at a site corresponding to that of the tibial bone drill hole of an anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. There was a significant difference between the two species (210 +/- 45 mg/cm(3) in porcine tibial bone versus 129 +/- 30 mg/cm(3) in women and 134 +/- 34 mg/cm(3) in men), suggesting that porcine knee specimens may have limitations in studies of graft fixation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. We found no difference between extraction and compaction drilling in initial fixation strength of a hamstring tendon graft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using a porcine model.     

Long-term outcome of endoscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with patellar tendon autograft: minimum 13-year review

BACKGROUND: Short-term results of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction are well reported; however, there are no studies evaluating endoscopic reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament with a minimum 10-year follow-up. HYPOTHESIS: Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with patellar tendon graft affords good subjective results and clinical laxity assessments but may be associated with development of osteoarthritis over the long term. STUDY DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: Endoscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction was performed in 67 consecutive patients without significant articular surface damage. Patients were assessed at 5, 7, and 13 years after surgery with the International Knee Documentation Committee Knee Ligament Evaluation Form, Lysholm knee score, hop tests, kneeling pain, and radiographs. RESULTS: At 13-year review, self-reported assessments remained excellent; 96% of patients reported normal or nearly normal knee function. Grade 0 or 1 results were seen in more than 92% of patients on laxity testing. Patients who had undergone meniscectomy at the time of reconstruction had increased laxity between 7 and 13 years on instrumented testing (P = .03) and 6 times greater odds of anterior cruciate ligament graft rupture than if they had not undergone meniscectomy (95% confidence interval, 1-37). Degenerative changes on radiographs were found in 79% of patients at 13 years and were associated with meniscectomy (P = .006), loss of extension (P = .05), and greater laxity on Lachman test (P = .04). CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with patellar tendon autograft affords and maintains good self-reported assessments and clinical ligament evaluation up to 13 years. Radiographic degenerative changes were seen in three quarters of patients. Almost half developed loss of extension, suggesting onset of early osteoarthritis. Patients who had undergone meniscectomy at the time of reconstruction had increased clinical ligament laxity over time and greater odds of graft rupture, possibly reflecting the effect of prolonged increased strain on the graft. Continued follow-up is required to resolve concerns regarding integrity of the patellar tendon graft beyond 13 years, particularly in the absence of meniscal tissue.     

Augmentation of autologous hamstring graft during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using the bone chip technique

The use of autologous quadrupled hamstring tendon graft is a well-known technique for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. In cases where the diameter of the graft is inadequate, the stability of graft fixation and subsequent bone to tendon healing may be compromised. We describe a new technique to augment the autologous double looped hamstring tendon graft during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using cancellous bone chips. This simple technique effectively enhances graft fixation and stability.     

Influence of medial hamstring tendon harvest on knee flexor strength after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. A detailed evaluation with comparison of single- and double-tendon harvest

BACKGROUND: The advantages of hamstring tendon autografts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction are well known; however, concerns have arisen regarding the influence of hamstring tendon harvest on postoperative weakness in knee flexion. PURPOSE: To evaluate the influence of hamstring tendon harvest on knee flexion strength in patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective randomized study. METHODS: Ninety patients were randomly assigned at surgery to undergo anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with either a semitendinosus tendon autograft or a semitendinosus and gracilis tendon autograft. Quadriceps and hamstring muscle strength was tested before surgery and at 6, 12, and 18 months after surgery. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in clinical results between the groups and neither group showed a significant decrease in isokinetic hamstring muscle strength. However, when the subjects' knees were at positions of 70 degrees or more of flexion, both isokinetic and isometric measurements revealed a significant decrease in hamstring muscle strength in both groups. The strength in the group with semitendinosus and gracilis tendons was considerably less than that in the group with semitendinosus tendon alone at 18 months. CONCLUSIONS: Tendon harvest causes significant weakness of hamstring muscle strength at high knee flexion angles, but such weakness can be minimized if the gracilis tendon is preserved.     

自体骨-髌腱-骨和腘绳肌腱单束重建陈旧性断裂前交叉韧带后移植物愈合形态学和前向稳定性比较

目的:探讨陈旧性前交叉韧带(anterior cruciate ligament,ACL)断裂患者,采用自体骨-髌腱-骨(bone-patellar tendon-bone,B-PT-B)和自体腘绳肌腱(hamstring tendon,HT)单束重建后移植物愈合的形态学表现以及前向稳定性是否存在差异。方法:2000年12月～2003年8月,我所77例受伤病史>12个月的ACL断裂患者,分别采用自体B-PT-B和HT作为移植物,接受了膝关节镜下ACL单束重建,因去除金属内固定进行二次手术,并接受关节镜探查(术后10～32个月,平均14.7个月)。根据移植物种类将其分为B-PT-B组(n=27)和HT组(n=50)两组,比较关节镜下移植物愈合形态学表现,采用膝关节韧带位移测量仪(KT-2000),分别在屈膝30°和90°时测量前向松弛度。结果:B-PT-B组和HT组移植物愈合形态学表现分别为:①韧带完整的分别占96.3%(26/27)和98.0%(49/50),部分断裂占3.7%(1/27)和2.0%(1/50)(χ2=0.000,P=1.000);②滑膜完整的分别占77.8%(21/27)和82.0%(41/50)(χ2=0.119,P=0.655);③滑膜内有明显血管形成的分别占63.0%(17/27)和76.0%(38/50)(χ2=1.460,P=0.227);④有分股表现的分别占22.2%(6/27,此6例均无完整滑膜覆盖)和32.0%(16/50)。屈膝30°时,两组前向松弛度分别为1.5±1.8 mm和2.2±1.3 mm(t=1.949,P=0.055),90°时分别为1.1±1.4mm和1.4±0.9 mm(t=1.467,P=0.147)。结论:采用自体B-PT-B和HT单束重建陈旧性ACL断裂,术后短期肉眼观察移植物愈合形态学表现无显著性差异,前向稳定性均满意,且无显著性差异。     

Central quadriceps free tendon for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Central quadriceps free tendon provides an outstanding autograft alternative for routine anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, allowing preservation of hamstring tendons and eliminating the morbidity of bone plug harvest from the patella. Correct graft harvest technique, proper tunnel/graft sizing, accurate fixation, and adherence to the methods described will permit excellent ACL reconstruction with low morbidity.     

A biomechanical evaluation of transcondylar femoral fixation of anterior cruciate ligament grafts

BACKGROUND: Interference screw fixation of the graft in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is considered the gold standard, but limited clinical experience suggests that transcondylar fixation is equally effective. PURPOSE: To compare transcondylar and interference screw fixation. STUDY DESIGN: Ex vivo biomechanical study. METHODS: Twenty pairs of unembalmed knees underwent anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with patellar tendon autografts. In 1 knee of each pair, the bone plug was stabilized in the femoral tunnel with standard interference screws; in the other knee, transcondylar screws were used. Testing to failure occurred immediately or after 1000 cycles of sinusoidal loading (30 to 150 N) (20 paired reconstructions each). Fixation stiffness, strength, graft creep, displacement amplitude, and change in amplitude were measured and compared (repeated measures anaylsis of variance with Tukey test; P <.05). RESULTS: There was no significant difference in acute strength, maximum load within 3 mm, or stiffness between transcondylar fixation (410 +/- 164 N, 183 +/- 93 N, and 49.6 +/- 28 N/mm, respectively) and interference fixation (497 +/- 216 N, 206 +/- 115 N, and 61 +/- 37.8 N/mm, respectively). Similarly, there was no significant difference in cyclic strength, maximum load within 3 mm, or stiffness between transcondylar fixation (496 +/- 214 N, 357 +/- 82.9 N, and 110 +/- 27.4 N/mm, respectively) and interference fixation (552 +/- 233 N, 357 +/- 76.2 N, and 112 +/- 26.8 N/mm, respectively). Predominant modes of failure were bone plug pullout (transcondylar fixation) and tendon failure or bone plug fracture (interference fixation). CONCLUSIONS: Transcondylar screw fixation of the patellar tendon autograft into the femoral tunnel performed mechanically as well as interference screw fixation. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The results suggest that transcondylar and interference screws provide similar fixation for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.     

Graft selection in surgicalreconstruction of the multiple-ligament-injured knee

Knowledge of the various graft options available for reconstruction of the knee with multiple ligamentous injuriesis necessary for the surgeon and patient to make an informed decision. Allograft is frequently used for such reconstructions, because multiple grafts are often necessary. Allograft avoids the morbidity associated with autograft harvest, allows smaller incisions, and saves operative time. A concern with the use of allograft, however, is the small but serious risk of disease transmission, including viral and bacterial infections. Allograft is also expensive and its availability may be limited. Some patients may prefer reconstruction with autograft tissue. Bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft is strong, stiff, and allows bony fixation at both ends. Harvest complications, primarily anterior knee pain, are drawbacks to using this source. Hamstring tendon autograft harvest results in less donor-site morbidity and comparable strength to bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft when bundled. Quadriceps tendon autograft also has been used in knee reconstruction, offering a strong graft with less morbidity than bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft harvest. Quadriceps tendon harvest is technically challenging, however. Achilles tendon and anterior tibialis allografts, as well as both autograft/allograft patellar tendon, quadriceps tendon, and hamstring tendon can all be used to reconstruct the anterior cruciate ligament, posterior cruciate ligament, or collateral ligament complexes. Ultimately, the choice of graft is dependent on surgeon and patient preference, availability of graft sources, and the number of ligaments requiring reconstruction or augmentation.