Management of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas

Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) of the pancreas is a distinct entity characterized by papillary proliferations of mucin-producing epithelial cells with excessive mucus production and cystic dilatation of the pancreatic ducts. IPMNs have malignant potential and exhibit a broad histologic spectrum, ranging from adenoma to invasive carcinoma. IPMNs are classified into main duct and branch duct types, based on the site of tumor involvement. IPMN patients have a favorable prognosis if appropriately treated. The postoperative 5-year survival rate is nearly 100% for benign tumors and noninvasive carcinoma, and approximately 60% for invasive carcinoma. A main duct type IPMN should be resected. Surgical treatment is indicated for a branch duct IPMN with suspected malignancy (tumor diameter ≥ 30 mm, mural nodules, dilated main pancreatic duct, or positive cytology) or positive symptoms. Malignant IPMNs necessitate lymph node dissection (D1). IPMNs are associated with a high incidence of extrapancreatic malignancies and pancreatic ductal carcinoma.     

Clinical aspects of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas

Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) is a spectrum of neoplasia in the pancreatic duct epithelium characterized by cystic dilation of the main and/or branch pancreatic duct. According to the site of involvement IPMNs are classified into three categories, i.e., main duct type, branch duct type, and combined type. Most branch duct IPMNs are benign, whereas the other two types are often malignant. A large size of branch duct IPMN and marked dilation of the main pancreatic duct indicate the presence of adenoma at least. The additional existence of large mural nodules increases the possibility of malignancy in all types. Of recent interest is the relatively high prevalence of synchronous and/or metachronous malignancy in various organs, including the pancreas. The prognosis is favorable after complete resection of benign and noninvasive malignant IPMNs. Malignant IPMNs acquiring aggressiveness after parenchymal invasion necessitate adequate lymph node dissection. On the other hand, asymptomatic branch duct IPMNs without mural nodules can be observed without resection for a considerably long time. This review addresses available data, current understanding, controversy, and future directions.     

Pancreatic juice cytology in IPMN of the pancreas.

BACKGROUND: Intraductal papillary-mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) of the pancreas is a disease ranging from adenoma to borderline (with moderate dysplasia) and further to carcinoma (noninvasive and invasive) and surgical strategy is different by the grades of dysplasia. METHODS: Preoperative pancreatic juice cytology in IPMN was reviewed in 71 patients with IPMN who underwent surgical resection. RESULTS: The IPMN was adenoma in 48 patients, borderline in 13 and carcinoma (invasive) in 10. The sensitivity of pancreatic juice cytology in malignant IPMN was 40% (4/10). In 4 patients with the 48 IPM adenomas, diagnosis of pancreatic juice cytology was class IV or V. One of the 4 cases was considered to be an overdiagnosis of cytology, but the other 3 cases were considered to be a consequence of accompanying carcinoma in situ (or PanIN-3) (2 patients) or invasive ductal adenocarcinoma (1 patient) apart from IPMN. Sensitivity of pancreatic juice cytology was higher in IPMN of the main duct type with mucin hypersecretion and with mural nodules. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that pancreatic juice cytology in IPMN is useful especially in the main duct type with mucin hypersecretion and mural nodules. When the diagnosis of pancreatic juice cytology is malignant in otherwise benign-looking IPMNs, coexistence of pancreatic carcinoma should be suspected.     

Preoperative evaluation of malignancy in intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas, especially in relation to dysplastic epithelial changes

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms have a better prognosis than ductal adenocarcinomas of the pancreas. The aim of this study was to evaluate the malignant potential of IPMNs by their preoperative images. METHODOLOGY: Forty-three intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms were divided into 3 duct ectatic types using preoperative images (the main duct type, the branch duct type, and the mixed type), and into 2 groups using resected specimens (the malignant group including severe dysplasia based on the WHO classification and the benign group). The diameters of the tumor, main pancreatic duct and mural nodule were measured on the images. RESULTS: Two thirds of main duct type cases were in the malignant group. For the branch duct and mixed types, the diameters of the tumor and detectable mural nodules were larger in the malignant group than in the benign group. A tumor diameter larger than 3.5cm and a mural nodule diameter larger than 6mm were risk factors for malignancy (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The main duct type, a tumor larger than 3.5cm of the branch duct or mixed type, and a mural nodule larger than 6mm were all indicators of malignancy risk.     

Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas: diagnosis and treatment

Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) is characterized by cystic dilatation of the main and/or branch pancreatic duct. Only one-third of all patients are symptomatic, and others are diagnosed by chance. IPMNs are classified into 3 types: main duct, branch duct, and mixed IPMN. Most branch-type IPMNs are benign, while the other 2 types are frequently malignant. The presence of large mural nodules increases the possibility of malignancy in all types. Presence of a large branch-type IPMN and marked dilatation of the main duct indicate, at the very least, the existence of adenoma. Ultrasonography, endosonography, and intraductal ultrasonography clearly demonstrate ductal dilatation and mural nodules, and magnetic resonance pancreatography best visualizes the entire outline of IPMN. Not infrequently, synchronous or metachronous malignancy develops in various organs, including the pancreas. Prognosis is excellent after complete resection of benign and noninvasive malignant IPMNs. Asymptomatic branch-type IPMNs without mural nodules may be followed up without resection. Malignant IPMNs displaying acquired aggressiveness after parenchymal invasion require adequate lymph node dissection. Total pancreatectomy is needed for some IPMNs; its benefits, however, must be balanced against operative and postoperative risks because most IPMNs are slow growing and affect elderly people, and prognosis is favorable for IPMN patients with even malignant neoplasms.     

Optimal management of the branch duct type intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas

GOALS: To determine the optimal management of the intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) according to the morphologic type based on distinguishing between benign and malignant diseases. BACKGROUNDS: IPMNs are increasingly recognized clinicopathologic entity. Extended pancreatic resection with radical lymph node dissection has been recommended for treatment. STUDY: A retrospective clinicopathologic study was carried out of the 57 cases with IPMNs who were treated between 1985 and 2001. Forty-three patients with IPMNs underwent resection, and 14 patients with small IPMNs were observed without resection. RESULTS: Among the 43 resected IPMNs, 25 were benign and 18 were malignant. Malignant tumors were significantly greater in diameter than benign tumors (52.9 vs. 30.2 mm, P< 0.05). All main duct type tumors with mural nodules were malignant. All branch duct type tumors less than 30 mm in diameter and without mural nodules were benign. Twelve branch duct type IPMNs size less than 30 mm were not resected and have not progressed. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that the branch duct type IPMNs less than 30 mm and without mural nodules is benign and might be treatable with limited resection or careful observation.     

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE OF INTRADUCTAL ULTRASONOGRAPHY FOR DIAGNOSIS OF INTRADUCTAL PAPILLARY MUCINOUS NEOPLASM OF THE PANCREAS

Intraductal ultrasonography (IDUS) is useful for evaluating the horizontal spread along the main pancreatic duct in cases of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) of the pancreas, thus providing valuable information for the determination of the resection line at surgery. Differentiation between benign and malignant IPMN is also indispensable for management decisions. Measurement of the height of mural nodules by IDUS is expected to be useful for differential diagnosis of IPMN. Because IDUS cannot always demonstrate whole lesions, especially in branch duct IPMN, endoscopic ultrasonography plays a complementary role in such cases.     

Intraductal papillary-mucinous tumors of the pancreas: differential diagnosis between benign and malignant tumors by endoscopic ultrasonography

OBJECTIVES: Recently, intraductal papillary-mucinous tumor (IPMT) of the pancreas has increasingly been recognized. However, differential diagnosis between benign and malignant IPMT is often difficult using conventional imaging modalities. The purpose of this study was to retrospectively investigate the value of endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) for differentiating malignant from benign IPMT. METHODS: A total of 51 patients with IPMT were preoperatively examined by EUS. The endosonograhic findings were compared with histopathological findings of the resected specimens. RESULTS: In main duct type IPMT, the diameter of the main pancreatic duct (MPD) was > or =10 mm in seven of the eight malignant tumors, compared with two of the seven benign tumors (p < 0.05). In branch duct type IPMT, three of the four large tumors (>40 mm) with irregular thick septa were malignant lesions. In both main duct type IPMT and branch duct IPMT, eight patients had large mural nodules (>10 mm); seven of the eight tumors were malignant and one of the eight tumors was benign. When the tumor was diagnosed as malignant according to above three findings, EUS was able to differentiate between malignant and benign IPMT with an accuracy of 86%. CONCLUSIONS: Main duct type tumors with > or =10 mm dilated MPD, branch duct type tumors (>40 mm) with irregular septa, and large mural nodules (>10 mm) strongly suggest malignancy on EUS. EUS would be a useful modality for differentiating between benign and malignant IPMT.     

Size of mural nodule as an indicator of surgery for branch duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas during follow-up

Background

A mural nodule is a strong predictive factor for malignancy in branch duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) of the pancreas, but the nodule size has hardly been considered. The aim of this study was to investigate whether a mural nodule of 10?mm was appropriate as an indicator of surgery for IPMN during follow-up.

Methods

The follow-up outcomes of 100 patients who had branch duct IPMN without mural nodules or who had branch duct IPMN with mural nodules of less than 9?mm in a tertiary care setting were investigated retrospectively. The patients underwent abdominal ultrasound (US) every 3?months and additional imaging examinations or cytologic examination of pancreatic juice when necessary. Surgery was recommended to them when a mural nodule developed or when a nodule enlarged and reached 10?mm.

Results

During an average follow-up period of 97?months, branch duct IPMNs developed mural nodules that reached 10?mm in 5 patients (0.62% per year). In one patient the IPMN was revealed to be non-invasive carcinoma by resection, 1 IPMN was shown to be malignant by further follow-up, and 3 were not resected because of refusal or the patient??s age. In 7 patients, mural nodules stayed within 9?mm. The remaining 88 patients lacked mural nodules in their branch duct IPMNs throughout the follow-up. The occurrence of invasive carcinoma around the IPMN was not indicated by imaging examinations in any patient. Univariate analysis showed that the size of the cyst at baseline significantly predicted the development of a mural nodule that reached 10?mm during follow-up (P?=?0.05).

Conclusions

A mural nodule of 10?mm is appropriate as an indicator of surgery in the follow-up of branch duct IPMN.     

胰腺导管内乳头状黏液瘤

胰腺导管内乳头状黏液瘤（IPMN）是由胰腺导管内产生黏液的上皮细胞呈乳头状增殖形成的肿瘤。与经典的胰腺癌相比,IPMN具有低度恶性、生长缓慢、少有侵犯周围组织、淋巴结转移率和再发率低的特点。IPMN根据肿瘤累及的部位可分为主胰管型、分支胰管型和混合型,病理组织特征涵盖从单纯腺瘤到浸润癌等多个亚型,临床表现多样,多种影像学检查手段可显示弥漫性或节段性扩张的主胰管和囊状扩张的分支胰管,ERCP经扩大的乳头获取黏液和胰液,取胰腺导管内皮组织和壁结节供活检均有助于诊断。IPMN确诊后应积极手术,手术切除率高,术后5年生存率高于一般的胰腺癌。本文就其临床表现、分类、病理特征、影像学诊断和治疗等方面做一综述。     

COMPARISON OF THE HEIGHT OF PAPILLARY TUMOR IN INTRADUCTAL PAPILLARY MUCINOUS NEOPLASM OF THE PANCREAS BETWEEN MEASURED PREOPERATIVE IMAGES AND RESECTED MATERIAL

The height of the mural nodules and papillary tumors in main pancreatic duct or dilated branch duct is the most important factor for diagnosis of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN). In this study, the authors compared the height of the papillary lesions and mural nodules between the height of resected tissues and the height detected by the preoperative imaging tools (endoscopic ultrasonography [EUS] and intraductal ultrasonography [IDUS]) in 38 patients with IPMN. In 21 out of 23 cases of adenoma, and in cases with the non‐invasive cancer, the difference of the height of operative and preoperative analysis measured by EUS and IDUS was within 1–2 mm. EUS and IDUS are useful for diagnosis of degree of malignancy in IPMN.     

MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES FOR BRANCH DUCT INTRADUCTAL PAPILLARY‐MUCINOUS NEOPLASMS

Management strategies for branch duct intraductal papillary‐mucinous neoplasms (IPMN) have been discussed. The authors’ clinical criteria with special attention to the size of cystic lesion, the diameter of main pancreatic duct, and the size of mural nodule established in 2001 is useful for managing branch duct IPMN. A total of 55 of 60 cases with branch duct IPMN had no radiologic progression during an average follow up of 701 days. In addition, no case out of 27 cases with branch duct IPMN followed up for 3 years changed to positive in cytological examination using pancreatic juice. There were four cases of branch type IPMN with some changes in their image findings. There were two cases of branch type IPMN with pancreatic symptoms. A total of three out of these five cases were surgically resected. The ordinary‐type ductal carcinoma was detected in two cases with branch duct IPMN at 3 or 4 years later. These results suggest that a long‐term careful follow‐up study by computed tomography or ultrasonography at every 6 months would be needed in the management of branch duct IPMN. Further studies will be needed to dissolve this problem in the future.     

Imaging IPMN: take home messages and news

IPMN is a frequent disease involving pancreatic duct. This disease could be malignant (parenchymal invasive adenocarcinoma), particularly if the main pancreatic duct is involved (this involvement is considered present if > 6 mm), if this enlargement reaches 10 mm or more, and if the pathological phenotype is biliopancreatic or intestinal (malignancy is less frequent if gastric one). Invasiveness is suspected if hypodense parenchymal lesion is present, particularly near a cystical lesion or MPD, a mural nodule of the wall, or if MPD wall has got a contrast uptake. Mural nodules inside cystic branch duct are associated with in situ grade 3 malignancies. MPD IPMN must be resected to prevent malignancy. The follow-up of isolated branch duct cysts relies upon MDCT and MRI, every two years if lesion is less than 1cm. Every one year if bigger, particularly if more than to 3 cm.     

胰管内乳头状黏液性肿瘤的术前良、恶性与浸润性预测因子

目的 分析术前预测胰管内乳头状黏液性肿瘤(IPMN)良、恶性与浸润性的因子,及不同病理类型IPMN的手术后生存率.方法 回顾性分析长海医院1993年1月至2009年9月间手术切除的78例IPMN病例资料,采用单因素与多因素分析的方法分析病史、临床表现、肝功能、CEA、CA19-9、影像学征象等在术前判断IPMN良、恶性与浸润性的价值,分析患者术后生存率.结果 单因素分析结果显示,黄疸、急性胰腺炎、血CA19-9>37 U/ml、AKP、肿块边界不清为恶性及浸润性预测因子;主胰管扩张、分支胰管直径>30 mm、出现壁节结等为恶性预测因子;CEA>6 ng/ml为浸润性预测因子.多因素分析显示,肿块边界不清为恶性及浸润性预测因子;急性胰腺炎为浸润性预测因子.良性IPMN患者的5年生存率为100%;恶性IPMN的2年生存率为78.9%、5年生存率为68.5%,其中浸润性IPMN的2年生存率为64.6%、5年生存率为43.1%.结论 肿块边界不清为IPMN恶性预测因子,急性胰腺炎、肿块边界不清是IPMN的浸润性预测因子.     

Pancreatic juice cytology as sensitive test for detecting pancreatic malignancy in intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas without mural nodule

ObjectiveRecent studies reported that mural nodule (MN) was the most associated with malignant intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs). However, IPMNs without MN cannot be diagnosed as malignant if only MN is determined to be indicator of malignancy. This study aimed to investigate role of pancreatic juice cytology for IPMNs without MN.MethodsMedical records of 50 patients with histologically proven malignant IPMNs were reviewed. Exclusively for non-invasive cancer, extent of high-grade dysplasia along the main pancreatic duct (MPD) was determined microscopically.ResultsThirty-six percent IPMNs had no MN. Cyst and main MPD diameter were significantly smaller in IPMN without MN compared to those in IPMN with MN (23 ± 14.1 vs 35 ± 13.2 mm, p = 0.010; 6.6 ± 4.3 vs 10.9 ± 6.1 mm, p = 0.006). Sensitivity of pancreatic juice cytology was higher in IPMN without MN compared to that in IPMN with MN (94% vs 53%, p = 0.004) although it could be affected by selection bias of study patients. Absence of MN was determined to be an independent factor associated with true positive cytology (OR = 24.3, p = 0.005). Extent of high-grade dysplasia was significantly longer in IPMN with true positive cytology compared to that in IPMN with false negative cytology (46.8 ± 20.5 vs 26.4 ± 11.0 mm, p = 0.005), and tended to be longer in IPMN without MN compared to that in IPMN with MN (47.0 ± 19.0 vs 36.0 ± 20.1 mm, p = 0.16).ConclusionsSensitivity of pancreatic juice cytology was excellent in IPMN without MN. Pancreatic juice cytology may be a sensitive test for detection of pancreatic malignancy in IPMN without MN compared to high-risk imaging features.     

Clinicopathological features and medical management of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms

BACKGROUND: Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMN) are a clinicopathological entity that is being diagnosed with increasing frequency. However, the best approach to medical management of IPMN needs to be clarified. The aim of the present study was to identify preoperative features that may be predictors of malignant IPMN, and to define the medical management of IPMN of the pancreas. METHODS: A total of 23 patients who underwent surgical resection for IPMN of the pancreas at Kochi Medical School between 1982 and 2004 were examined. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was used to identify factors independently associated with IPM carcinoma. RESULTS: Among the 23 patients, 12 had IPMN adenoma, three had borderline IPMN, four had IPMN with carcinoma in situ, and four had IPMN with invasive carcinoma. In multivariate analysis, elevated serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9 levels were found to be preoperative predictors of malignant IPMN. These results suggest that the following IPMN of the pancreas should be resected: (i) IPMN of the pancreas situated in the main duct; (ii) IPMN located in the branch duct if the size of the cystic lesion is >30 mm and the mural nodules are >5 mm in height by endoscopic ultrasound (EUS); and (iii) the diameter of the main pancreatic duct is >10 mm by endoscopic retrograde pancreatography (ERP). Careful observation of patients with branch-type IPMN with small cysts and/or without mural nodules is recommended as a management strategy. CONCLUSION: The present study reinforces the need for immediate surgical resection of malignant IPMN and suggests indicators for IPMN that should assist physicians in making decisions on treatment options.     

Cytological and Cyst Fluid Analysis of Small (≤3 cm) Branch Duct Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms Adds Value to Patient Management Decisions

Background/Aim: Management of patients with small (1–3 cm) branch duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMN) is a challenge. Symptoms, dilated duct, mural nodule or positive cytology have been proposed as parameters for resection. The aim of our study was to compare this proposed algorithm to one that incorporates cytology with less than malignant epithelial cells and cyst fluid carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA). Methods: A retrospective study was conducted. Results: There were 14 nonmalignant and 6 malignant cysts with 3 invasive IPMN. None were associated with a dilated duct and none had positive cytology. Only a mural nodule was significant by univariate analysis for the detection of malignancy (p = 0.01) and invasion (p = 0.009). The detection of atypical epithelial cells or a cyst fluid CEA of >2,500 ng/ml was more accurate for the detection of malignancy than using the recommended algorithm. Conclusions: The presence of a mural nodule in a small branch duct IPMN is a predictor of malignancy and invasion by univariate analysis. Recognition of an atypical epithelial cell component in contrast to positive cytology or a cyst fluid CEA of >2,500 ng/ml is more accurate than the recommended algorithm and adds value to the preoperative assessment of clinically diagnosed small branch duct IPMN.     

PERORAL PANCREATOSCOPY AND INTRADUCTAL ULTRASONOGRAPHY IN DETERMINING THE RESECTION LINES OF INTRADUCTAL PAPILLARY MUCINOUS TUMORS OF THE PANCREAS

In patients with malignant intraductal papillary–mucinous tumors (IPMT), the tumor spread along the main pancreatic duct is generally inspected as mural nodules within the ducts by peroral pancreatoscopy (POPS). Even the lower mural nodules including fish‐eggs‐like lesions and granular mucosa continued to the main taller mural nodules should be resected. Mural nodules along the main duct and cystic dilation of the branch ducts observed by intraductal ultrasonography (IDUS) are regarded as the tumor spread. Although POPS is superior to IDUS in identifying mural nodules along the main duct, POPS has limitations to detect mural nodules within the branch ducts. Therefore, the accuracy of the diagnosis by POPS is higher in main duct IPMT, whereas that by IDUS is higher in branch duct IPMT. These modalities should be performed as complementary tests in determining the resection lines preoperatively.     

Cyst fluid SPINK1 may help to differentiate benign and potentially malignant cystic pancreatic lesions

ObjectiveDifferential diagnosis between benign and potentially malignant cystic pancreatic lesions may be difficult. Previously we have compared cyst fluid serine protease inhibitor Kazal type I (SPINK1) with some traditionally used tumour markers (amylase, CEA, Ca19-9) and found that it may be a new promising maker in the differential diagnosis of cystic pancreatic lesions. In the present study, we focused on cyst fluid SPINK1 levels in benign and potentially malignant cystic pancreatic lesions.DesignSixty-one patients operated on for cystic pancreatic lesion in Tampere University Hospital, Finland and in Verona University Hospital, Italy, were included. Cyst fluid was aspirated during surgery, stored at ?70 °C, and analysed with immunofluorometric assay for SPINK1. The final diagnosis was acute pancreatitis with fluid collection (Acute FC) in 4 patients, chronic pseudocyst (PS) in 17 patients, serous cystadenoma (SCA) in 7 patients, mucinous cystadenoma (MCA) in 21 patients and intraductal papillary-mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) in 12 patients (9 main/mixed duct type and 3 branch duct type).ResultsThe acute FC patients had high SPINK1 levels. Among chronic cysts, SPINK1 levels were significantly higher in patients with potentially malignant cysts (main/mixed duct IPMN and MCA) than with benign cysts (side branch IPMN and SCA), (median and range, [480 (13–3602) vs. 18 (0.1–278) μg/L]; p < 0.0001). In the subcohort of 24 patients with <3 cm chronic cyst, cyst fluid SPINK 1 levels were significantly lower in SCA or side branch IPMN (3 [2–116] μg/L) than in main duct IPMN or MCA (638 [66–3602] μg/L; p = 0.018). The best sensitivity and specificity to differentiate any size MCA or main/mixed type IPMN from SCA or side branch IPMN were 85% and 84% (AUC 0.94; cut-off value 118 μg/L). The best sensitivity and specificity to differentiate <3 cm MCA or main duct IPMN from SCA or side branch IPMN were 93% and 89% (AUC 0.98; cut-off value 146 μg/L).ConclusionsCyst fluid SPINK1 may be a possible marker in the differential diagnosis of benign and potentially malignant cystic pancreatic lesions.     

Can the location of the mural nodule indicate benign or malignant in branch duct-type intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas?

Background/ObjectivesIntraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) are classified into main duct (MD)-type IPMNs, branch duct (BD)-type IPMNs, and mixed type IPMNs. While MD-type IPMN has a high risk of malignancy and should therefore be considered for resection if the patient is fit, BD-type IPMN needs to be carefully judged for surgical indication. The decision to resect BD-type IPMN is often based on international consensus Fukuoka guidelines 2017, but further investigation is required. In this study, we focused on whether the location of the mural nodule (MN) could be an indicator of malignancy.MethodsWe enrolled 17 cases who had been diagnosed BD-type IPMNs which were surgically resected from January 2016 to December 2019. These cases were classified into benign and malignant group. Subsequently, a clinicopathological study was conducted based on the localization of MN (MN-central type or MN-peripheral type).ResultsAlthough MN was found in 57% (4/11) in the benign group, 88% (7/8) was noted in the malignant group, indicating the presence of MN to be more common in the malignant group. Those with MN consisted of 6 cases of MN-central type and 5 cases of MN-peripheral type. All cases of central type were malignant compared to only one case of the peripheral group being confirmed on histology as cancer.ConclusionBD-IPMN with central mural nodule should be considered high risk for malignancy.