Preoperative characteristics of high-Gleason disease predictive of favourable pathological and clinical outcomes at radical prostatectomy

Study Type – Diagnostic (exploratory cohort) Level of Evidence 2b What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? Men with high‐risk prostate cancer experience recurrence, metastases and death at the highest rate in the prostate cancer population. Pathological stage at radical prostatectomy (RP) is the greatest predictor of recurrence and mortality in men with high‐grade disease. Preoperative models predicting outcome after RP are skewed by the large proportion of men with low‐ and intermediate‐risk features; there is a paucity of data about preoperative criteria to identify men with high‐grade cancer who may benefit from RP. The present study adds comprehensive biopsy data from a large cohort of men with high‐grade prostate cancer at biopsy. By adding biopsy parameters, e.g. number of high‐grade cores and >50% involvement of any core, to traditional predictors of outcome (prostate‐specific antigen concentration, clinical stage and Gleason sum), we can better inform men who present with high‐grade prostate cancer as to their risk of favourable or unfavourable disease at RP.

OBJECTIVE

• ? To investigate preoperative characteristics that distinguish favourable and unfavourable pathological and clinical outcomes in men with high biopsy Gleason sum (8–10) prostate cancer to better select men who will most benefit from radical prostatectomy (RP).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

• ? The Institutional Review Board‐approved institutional RP database (1982–2010) was analysed for men with high‐Gleason prostate cancer on biopsy; 842 men were identified.
• ? The 10‐year biochemical‐free (BFS), metastasis‐free (MFS) and prostate cancer‐specific survival (CSS) were calculated using the Kaplan–Meier method to verify favourable pathology as men with Gleason <8 at RP or ≤ pT3a compared with men with unfavourable pathology with Gleason 8–10 and pT3b or N1.
• ? Preoperative characteristics were compared using appropriate comparative tests.
• ? Logistic regression determined preoperative predictors of unfavourable pathology.

RESULTS

• ? There was favourable pathology in 656 (77.9%) men. The 10‐year BFS, MFS and CSS were 31.0%, 60.9% and 74.8%, respectively.
• ? In contrast, men with unfavourable pathological findings had significantly worse 10‐year BFS, MFS and CSS, at 4.3%, 29.1% and 52.3%, respectively (all P < 0.001).
• ? In multivariable logistic regression, a prostate‐specific antigen (PSA) concentration of >10 ng/mL (odds ratio [OR] 2.24, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.38–3.62, P= 0.001), advanced clinical stage (≥ cT2b; OR 2.55, 95% CI 1.55–4.21, P < 0.001), Gleason pattern 9 or 10 at biopsy (OR 2.55, 95% CI 1.59–4.09, P < 0.001), increasing number of cores positive with high‐grade cancer (OR 1.16, 95% CI 1.01–1.34, P= 0.04) and >50% positive core involvement (OR 2.25, 95% CI 1.17–4.35, P= 0.015) were predictive of unfavourable pathology.

CONCLUSIONS

• ? Men with high‐Gleason sum at biopsy are at high risk for biochemical recurrence, metastasis and death after RP; men with high Gleason sum and advanced pathological stage (pT3b or N1) have the worst prognosis.
• ? Among men with high‐Gleason sum at biopsy, a PSA concentration of >10 ng/mL, clinical stage ≥ T2b, Gleason pattern 9 or 10, increasing number of cores with high‐grade cancer and >50% core involvement are predictive of unfavourable pathology.

     

Magnetic resonance imaging does not improve the prediction of misclassification of prostate cancer patients eligible for active surveillance when the most stringent selection criteria are based on the saturation biopsy scheme

Study Type – Diagnostic (case series) Level of Evidence 4

OBJECTIVE

• ? To investigate the role of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in selecting patients for active surveillance (AS).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

• ? We identified prostate cancers patients who had undergone a 21‐core biopsy scheme and fulfilled the criteria as follows: prostate‐specific antigen (PSA) level ≤10 ng/mL, T1–T2a disease, a Gleason score ≤6, <3 positive cores and tumour length per core <3 mm.
• ? We included 96 patients who underwent a radical prostatectomy (RP) and a prostate MRI before surgery.
• ? The main end point of the study was the unfavourable disease features at RP, with or without the use of MRI as AS inclusion criterion.

RESULTS

• ? Mean age and mean PSA were 62.4 years and 6.1 ng/mL, respectively. Prostate cancer was staged pT3 in 17.7% of cases.
• ? The rate of unfavourable disease (pT3–4 and/or Gleason score ≥4 + 3) was 24.0%. A T3 disease on MRI was noted in 28 men (29.2%).
• ? MRI was not a significant predictor of pT3 disease in RP specimens (P = 0.980), rate of unfavourable disease (P = 0.604), positive surgical margins (P = 0.750) or Gleason upgrading (P = 0.314).
• ? In a logistic regression model, no preoperative parameter was an independent predictor of unfavourable disease in the RP specimen.
• ? After a mean follow‐up of 29 months, the recurrence‐free survival (RFS) was statistically equivalent between men with T3 on MRI and those with T1–T2 disease (P = 0.853).

CONCLUSION

• ? The results of the present study emphasize that, when the selection of patients for AS is based on an extended 21‐core biopsy scheme, and uses the most stringent inclusion criteria, MRI does not improve the prediction of high‐risk and/or non organ‐confined disease in a RP specimen.

     

Effect of delaying surgery on radical prostatectomy outcomes: a contemporary analysis

Study Type – Therapy (case series) Level of Evidence 4 What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? For patients electing surgical treatment, the question of the effect of surgical delay on clinical outcomes in prostate cancer is controversial. In this study we examined the effect of delay from diagnosis to surgery on outcomes in men with localized prostate cancer and found no association between time to surgery and risk of biochemical recurrence, even for patients with longer delays and high‐risk disease. Men with localized prostate cancer can be reassured that reasonable delays in treatment will not influence disease outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

• ? To examine the effect of time from last positive biopsy to surgery on clinical outcomes in men with localized prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

• ? We conducted a retrospective review of 2739 men who underwent RP between 1990 and 2009 at our institution.
• ? Clinical and pathological features were compared between men undergoing RP ≤ 60, 61–90 and >90 days from the time of prostate biopsy.
• ? A Cox proportional hazards model was used to analyse the association between clinical features and surgical delay with biochemical progression. Biochemical recurrence (BCR)‐free rates were assessed using the Kaplan–Meier method.

RESULTS

• ? Of the 1568 men meeting the inclusion criteria, 1098 (70%), 303 (19.3%) and 167 (10.7%) had a delay of ≤60, 61–90 and >90 days, respectively, between biopsy and RP. A delay of >60 days was not associated with adverse pathological findings at surgery.
• ? The 5‐year survival rate was similar among the three groups (78–85%, P= 0.11).
• ? In a multivariate Cox model, men with higher PSA levels, clinical stages, Gleason sums, and those of African‐American race were all at higher risk for developing BCR.
• ? A delay to surgery of >60 days was not associated with worse biochemical outcomes in a univariate and multivariate model.

CONCLUSIONS

• ? A delay of >60 days is not associated with adverse pathological outcomes in men with localized prostate cancer, nor does it correlate with worse BCR‐free survival.
• ? Patients can be assured that delaying treatment while considering therapeutic options will not adversely affect their outcomes.

     

Genome gender diversity in affected sib-pairs with familial vesico-ureteric reflux identified by single nucleotide polymorphism linkage analysis

Study Type – Therapy (case series) Level of Evidence 4 What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? Despite a lack of randomised controlled trials, most men with locally advanced prostate cancer are recommended to undergo external beam radiotherapy (EBRT), often combined with long‐term androgen‐deprivation therapy (ADT). Many of these men are not offered radical prostatectomy (RP) by their treating urologist. Additionally, it is know that EBRT with long‐term ADT does provide good cancer control (88% at 10 years). We have previously published intermediate‐term follow‐up of a large series of men treatment with RP for cT3 prostate cancer. We report long‐term follow‐up of a large series of men treated with RP as primary treatment for cT3 prostate cancer. Our study shows that with long‐term follow‐up RP provides excellent oncological outcomes even at 20 years. While most men do require a multimodal treatment approach, many men can be managed successfully with RP alone.

OBJECTIVE

• ? To present long‐term survival outcomes after radical prostatectomy (RP) for patients with cT3 prostate cancer, as the optimal treatment for patients with clinical T3 prostate cancer is debated.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

• ? We identified 843 men who underwent RP for cT3 tumours between 1987 and 1997.
• ? Survival was estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method.
• ? Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to evaluate the association of clinicopathological features with outcome

RESULTS

• ? The median (range) postoperative follow‐up was 14.3 (0.1–23.5) years.
• ? Down‐staging to pT2 disease occurred in 26% (223/843) at surgery.
• ? Local recurrence‐free, systemic progression‐free and cancer‐specific survival for men with cT3 prostate cancer after RP was 76%, 72%, and 81%, respectively, at 20 years.
• ? On multivariate analysis, increasing RP Gleason score (hazard ratio [HR] 1.8; P= 0.01), non‐diploid chromatin content (HR 1.8; P= 0.01), positive surgical margins (HR 2.1; P= 0.007), and seminal vesicle invasion (HR 2.1; P= 0.005) were associated with a significant risk of prostate cancer death, while a more recent year of surgery was associated with a decreased risk of cancer‐specific mortality (HR 0.88; P= 0.01)

CONCLUSIONS

• ? RP affords accurate pathological staging and may be associated with durable cancer control for cT3 prostate cancer, with 20 years of follow‐up presented here.
• ? RP as part of a multimodal treatment strategy therefore remains a viable treatment option for patients with cT3 tumours.

     

The impact of nerve sparing on incidence and location of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy

Study Type – Therapy (case series) Level of Evidence 4 What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? Nerve sparing radical prostatectomy has been associated with increased risk of positive surgical margins due to the close anatomical relationship of the neurovascular bundle to the posterolateral aspect of the prostatic fascia. Our study of 945 men who underwent radical prostatectomy be one experienced surgeon found no increased risk of positive surgical margins, whether the cancer was organ confined or extracapsular extension was present.

OBJECTIVE

• ? To examine whether nerve‐sparing surgery (NSS) is a risk factor for positive surgical margins (PSMs) in patients with either organ‐confined prostate cancer or extracapsular extension (ECE).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

• ? Clinicopathological outcome data on 945 consecutive patients treated with radical prostatectomy (RP) were prospectively collected.
• ? All patients underwent RP (bilateral, unilateral or non‐NSS) by one surgeon between 2002 and 2007.
• ? Risk of PSMs and their locations with respect to NSS was determined by multivariate logistic regression analysis adjusting for preoperative risk factors for PSMs within pT2, pT3a and pT3b tumours.

RESULTS

• ? Overall a PSM was identified in 19.6% of patients in an unscreened population with mean prostate‐specific antigen (PSA) level of 8.1 ng/mL.
• ? There was no significant difference in rates of PSMs between NSS groups on multivariate analysis (P= 0.147).
• ? There was no significant difference in pT2 (P= 0.880), pT3a (P= 0.175) or pT3b (P= 0.354) tumours.
• ? The only significant predictor of PSMs was preoperative PSA level (risk ratio 1.289, P= 0.006).
• ? There was no significant difference in the location of PSMs except for the pT3a group, where the patients that had bilateral NSS were at higher risk of a posterolateral PSM (P= 0.028).

CONCLUSIONS

• ? With appropriate selection of patients, NSS does not increase the risk of PSMs, whether the cancer is organ confined or ECE is present.
• ? The adverse impact of the NSS procedure in the hands of an experienced surgeon is minimal and is a realistic compromise to obtain the increase in health‐related quality of life offered by NSS.

     

The value of urinary prostate cancer gene 3 (PCA3) scores in predicting pathological features at radical prostatectomy

Study Type – Diagnostic (exploratory cohort) Level of Evidence 2b What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? PCA3 scores correlate to numerous histoprognostic factors, specifically tumour volume and positive surgical margins. These results may have a clinical impact in the near future on the selection of patients eligible to undergo active surveillance and nerve‐sparing surgery.

OBJECTIVE

• ? To assess correlations between Prostate CAncer gene 3 (PCA3) levels and pathological features of radical prostatectomy (RP) specimens, which define cancer aggressiveness.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

• ? After digital rectal examination (DRE), first‐catch urine was collected from 160 patients with localized prostate cancer. The PCA3 score was calculated using the Gene Probe Progensa^? assay.
• ? PCA3 scores were then correlated to the pathological features of the RP specimens.

RESULTS

• ? PCA3 scores correlated significantly with tumour volume (r= 0.34, P < 0.01). A PCA3 score of >35 was an independent predictor in a multivariate analysis of a tumour volume >0.5 mL (odds ratio [OR] 2.7, P= 0.04).
• ? It was also an independent predictor of positive surgical margins (OR 2.4, P= 0.04). Receiver–operator characteristic curves indicated PCA3 as the most accurate predictor of positive margins (area under the curve [AUC] 0.62), in addition to a positive biopsy percentage (AUC 0.52).
• ? There was also a significant difference in the mean PCA3 score between Gleason score patient groups (6 vs ≥7) and pathological stage groups (pT0/2 vs pT3/4).

CONCLUSIONS

• ? PCA3 scores correlate to numerous histoprognostic factors, specifically tumour volume and positive surgical margins.
• ? These results may have a clinical impact in the near future on the selection of patients eligible to undergo active surveillance and nerve‐sparing surgery.

     

Prediction of outcomes after radical prostatectomy in patients diagnosed with prostate cancer of biopsy Gleason score ≥ 8 via contemporary multi (≥ 12)-core prostate biopsy

Study Type – Prognostic (case series) Level of Evidence 4 What’s known on the subject? and What does the study add? Currently, controversy continues with regards to the efficacy of performing radical prostatectomy (RP) and the potential predictor of outcome after surgery in patients with prostate cancers of higher biopsy Gleason score. Among contemporary patients with biopsy Gleason score ≥8 who underwent RP alone, patients with pathologically organ‐confined disease demonstrated significantly better biochemical outcome than others. Serum PSA level and maximum tumour length in a biopsy core, independent predictors of organ‐confined disease, would be useful in the selection of candidates for RP among patients presenting with biopsy Gleason score ≥8.

OBJECTIVE

• ? To investigate the outcome of patients who underwent radical prostatectomy (RP) for prostate cancer of biopsy Gleason score ≥ 8 diagnosed via contemporary prostate biopsy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

• ? We reviewed records of 151 patients who underwent RP for prostate cancer of biopsy Gleason score ≥ 8 detected via multi (≥12)‐core prostate biopsy without any neoadjuvant or adjuvant treatment.
• ? Preoperative predictors of pathologically organ‐confined disease along with biochemical recurrence‐free survival were analyzed via multivariate logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

• ? For 151 total subjects, 5‐year estimated biochemical recurrence‐free survival rate was 41.0%. Patients with pathologically organ‐confined disease were observed to have much higher 5‐year biochemical recurrence‐free survival rate than those otherwise (72.1 vs 31.5%, P < 0.001).
• ? Serum PSA level (P= 0.031) and maximum tumour length in a biopsy core (P= 0.005) were observed to be significant preoperative predictors of having pathologically organ‐confined disease.
• ? As for biochemical recurrence‐free survival following RP, serum PSA (P= 0.023), biopsy Gleason score (P= 0.032), and percent of total tumour length in biopsy cores (P < 0.001) were observed be significant preoperative predictors on multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSION

• ? Among contemporary patients with biopsy Gleason score ≥ 8 who underwent RP alone, patients with pathologically organ‐confined disease demonstrated significantly better biochemical outcome than others. Serum PSA level and maximum tumour length in a biopsy core, independent predictors of organ‐confined disease, would be useful in the selection of candidates for RP among patients presenting with biopsy Gleason score ≥ 8.

     

Transrectal ultrasonography-guided biopsy does not reliably identify dominant cancer location in men with low-risk prostate cancer

Study Type – Diagnostic (exploratory cohort) Level of Evidence 2b What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? The widespread use of serum PSA testing followed by TRUS‐guided biopsy have resulted in profound prostate cancer stage migration with many patients presenting with focal rather than multifocal disease. There is increasing interest in the use of focal rather than whole‐gland treatment. However, current biopsy schemes may still miss cancer or, even when cancer is identified, its extent or grade might not be accurately characterized. In order for focal therapy to be effective, the area of highest tumour volume and/or grade needs to localized accurately. The aim of this study was to assess how well biopsy, as currently performed, locates the focus of highest prostate cancer volume and/or grade.

OBJECTIVE

• ? To evaluate the ability of transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS)‐guided extended core biopsy to identify the dominant tumour accurately in men with early stage prostate cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

• ? Patients with early stage, low‐risk prostate cancer who subsequently underwent radical prostatectomy (RP) and had complete surgical specimens were identified.
• ? Re‐review was performed by a single uropathologist using ImageJ software to identify tumour location, dominant grade (DG) and dominant volume (DV).
• ? Pathology findings were then compared with biopsy results.

RESULTS

• ? A total of 51 men with early stage, low‐risk prostate cancer, who had undergone RP, had complete specimens for review and a median of 15 biopsy cores taken for diagnosis and grading.
• ? Sixteen men had a single diagnostic biopsy, 21 had one repeat biopsy, and 14 had two or more repeat biopsies.
• ? Compared with surgical findings, biopsy correctly identified the sextant with the largest tumour volume in 55% (95% CI 0.5–0.6) of specimens and the highest grade in 37% (95 CI 0.3–0.5).
• ? No demographic or clinical factors were significantly associated with identification of DG. Interval between last biopsy and RP, total tissue length taken and total length of tumour identified were significantly associated with correct identification of DV.

CONCLUSIONS

• ? Our findings show that TRUS‐guided biopsy detects and localizes DV better than it does DG.
• ? Even with an extended scheme, TRUS‐guided biopsy does not reliably identify dominant cancer location in this low‐risk cohort of men with early stage prostate cancer.
• ? TRUS‐guided biopsy may perform better in similar men with low stage, but higher volume disease.

     

The role of transrectal saturation biopsy in tumour localization: pathological correlation after retropubic radical prostatectomy and implication for focal ablative therapy

Study Type – Diagnostic (exploratory cohort) Level of Evidence 2b What’s known on the subject? and What does the study add? The traditional transrectal sextant and extended biopsy schemes demonstrated low accuracy in predicting unilateral prostate cancer on radical prostatectomy specimens. We examined the accuracy of an initial saturation biopsy (24‐core) to predict unilateral prostate cancer on radical prostatectomy specimens.

OBJECTIVE

• ? To evaluate the accuracy of an initial 24‐core prostate biopsy scheme (PBx24) in predicting unilateral prostate cancer (PCa) in radical prostatectomy (RP) specimens.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

• ? Between 2005 and 2008, 203 consecutive patients underwent PBx24 followed by RP for PCa. The area under the curve (AUC) was used to evaluate the accuracy of unilateral PCa on PBx24 to predict unilateral PCa in RP specimens.
• ? The positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were also calculated. Moreover, in patients with unilateral PCa on biopsy, univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses tested the relationship between the presence of unilateral PCa in an RP specimen and the variables: age, prostate‐specific antigen (PSA), total prostate volume, clinical stage, primary Gleason grade, secondary Gleason grade and the number of positive cores.

RESULTS

• ? PCa cores were unilateral in 115 patients (56.7%) on biopsy. Of those, only 26 (22.6%) had unilateral PCa in the RP specimen (AUC, 72.9%; PPV, 22.6%; NPV, 98.8%). In patients with clinically low‐risk tumours, only 17 of 63 (27%) had a unilateral PCa on PBx24 and in the RP specimen (AUC, 59.1%; PPV, 27.0%; NPV, 100.0%).
• ? None of the examined variables was an independent predictor of the presence of unilateral PCa in the RP specimen (all P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

• ? Initial PBx24 is not sufficiently accurate to be dependable as a method of predicting tumour laterality in RP specimens. Therefore, the use of PBx24 to guide hemi‐ablation therapy of PCa may lead to mistreatment in a considerable proportion of patients.
• ? Moreover, none of the routinely available clinical and pathological characteristics appears to improve the ability of unilateral PCa on biopsy to predict unilateral PCa in the RP specimen.

     

Patients aged more than 70 had higher risk of locally advanced prostate cancers and biochemical recurrence in Korea

Study Type – Prognosis (cohort series) Level of Evidence 2b What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? This study reports that patients aged 70 years or older have a higher possibility of locally advanced cancer than younger patients. Instead of conservative management, radical eradication of clinically localized prostate cancer should be actively considered in well‐selected healthy patients older than 70 years.

OBJECTIVE

• ? To analyse the differences in the clinicopathological results between two groups of Korean patients aged younger or older than 70 years with clinically localized prostate cancer.

METHODS

• ? A cohort of consecutive male patients who underwent radical prostatectomy was retrospectively analysed. In total, 995 patients (74.6%) were younger than 70 years, and 338 patients (25.4%) were 70 years or older.
• ? Biochemical recurrence (BCR) ‐free survival was evaluated in the patients, who were followed up for more than 24 months.
• ? The Kaplan–Meier method was used to calculate survival estimates for BCR‐free survival. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression analysis was performed to predict non‐organ‐confined status and BCR.

RESULTS

• ? Mean preoperative prostate‐specific antigen (PSA) levels and biopsy or pathological Gleason scores showed no differences between the two age groups.
• ? Older patients, aged more than 70 years, displayed significantly higher risk of locally advanced prostate cancer and BCR than younger patients.
• ? Subgroup analysis showed that the risk of the presence of locally advanced disease was significantly increased in patients of 70 years or older when we compared the proportion of locally advanced disease only in patients with PSA <4 ng/mL.
• ? Multivariate analysis showed that old age, high PSA and high Gleason score were significantly associated with non‐organ confined status and BCR.

CONCLUSIONS

• ? Patients aged 70 years or older had a higher possibility of locally advanced cancer than younger patients.
• ? Radical eradication of clinically localized prostate cancer should be actively considered in well‐selected healthy patients older than 70 years.

     

Prognostic value of insulin-like growth factor II mRNA binding protein 3 in patients treated with radical prostatectomy

Study Type – Prognosis (case series) Level of Evidence 4 What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? Insulin‐like growth factor II mRNA binding protein 3 (IMP3) is associated with poor outcomes in a variety of malignancies. The role of IMP3 in protate cancer remains poorly understood. IMP3 expression was associated with features of aggressive biology and aggressive prostate cancer recurrence after surgery. Although IMP3 is differentially expressed in patients with features of biologically aggressive prostate cancer, it does not have independent prognostic value in patients treated with RP.

OBJECTIVE

• ? To evaluate the association of insulin‐like growth factor II mRNA binding protein 3 (IMP3) with pathological features and outcomes in patients treated with radical prostatectomy (RP).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

• ? Immunohistochemical staining for IMP3 was performed on archival tissue microarray specimens from 232 consecutive patients treated with RP for clinically localized disease.
• ? None of the patients received neoadjuvant or adjuvant radiation or hormone therapy.
• ? IMP3 expression was histologically categorized as normal or abnormal.
• ? Disease recurrence was classified as aggressive if metastases were present, post‐recurrence prostate‐specific antigen (PSA) doubling time was less than 10 months, or if the patients failed to respond to salvage local radiation therapy.

RESULTS

• ? The median follow‐up was 69.8 months (interquartile range [IQR]: 40.1–99.5).
• ? IMP3 expression was abnormal in 42 (18.1%) of 232 patients.
• ? IMP3 expression was associated with extracapsular extension (P= 0.020), seminal vesicle invasion (P= 0.024), lymphovascular invasion (P= 0.036) and a high pathological Gleason score (P= 0.009).
• ? The 5‐year PSA recurrence‐free survival for IMP3‐negative patients was 83% (standard error [SE]= 3) vs 67% (SE = 8) in IMP3‐positive patients (log‐rank test, P= 0.015).
• ? In a multivariable analysis that adjusted for the effects of surgical margins, extracapsular extension and seminal vesicle invasion, PSA (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.04, P= 0.013), lymph node metastasis (HR: 16.7, P < 0.001) and a high pathological Gleason score (HR 4.3, P= 0.008) were significantly associated with PSA recurrence‐free survival, whereas IMP3 expression was not (P= 0.11). Similarly, IMP3 expression was only associated with aggressive recurrence (HR 3.2, P= 0.006).

CONCLUSION

• ? IMP3 expression is abnormal in approximately one‐fifth of prostate cancers. Although IMP3 is differentially expressed in patients with features of biologically aggressive prostate cancer, it does not have an independent prognostic value in patients treated with RP.

     

Radical prostatectomy vs radiation therapy and androgen-suppression therapy in high-risk prostate cancer

Study Type – Therapy (retrospective cohort analysis) Level of Evidence 2b What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? Prostate cancer is generally considered to be high risk when the prostate‐specific antigen (PSA) concentration is >20 ng/mL, the Gleason score is ≥8 or the American Joint Commission on Cancer (AJCC) tumour (T) category is ≥2c. There is no consensus on the best treatment for men with prostate cancer that includes these high‐risk features. Options include external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) with androgen suppression therapy (AST), treatment with a combination of brachytherapy, EBRT and AST termed combined‐modality therapy (CMT) or radical prostatectomy (RP) followed by adjuvant RT in cases where there are unfavourable pathological features, e.g. positive surgical margin, extracapsular extension and seminal vesicle invasion. While outcomes for both approaches have been published independently these treatments have not been compared in the setting of a prospective RCT where confounding factors related to patient selection for RP or CMT would be minimised. These factors include age, known prostate cancer prognostic factors and comorbidity. RCTs that compare RP to radiation‐based regimens have been attempted but failed to accrue.

OBJECTIVE

• ? To assess the risk of prostate cancer‐specific mortality after therapy with radical prostatectomy (RP) or combined‐modality therapy (CMT) with brachytherapy, external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) and androgen‐suppression therapy (AST) in men with Gleason score 8–10 prostate cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

• ? Men with localised high‐risk prostate cancer based on a Gleason score of 8–10 were selected for study from Duke University (285 men), treated between January 1988 and October 2008 with RP or from the Chicago Prostate Cancer Center or within the 21st Century Oncology establishment (372) treated between August 1991 and November 2005 with CMT.
• ? Fine and Gray multivariable regression was used to assess whether the risk of prostate cancer‐specific mortality differed after RP as compared with CMT adjusting for age, cardiac comorbidity and year of treatment, and known prostate cancer prognostic factors.

RESULTS

• ? As of January 2009, with a median (interquartile range) follow‐up of 4.62 (2.4–8.2) years, there were 21 prostate cancer‐specific deaths.
• ? Treatment with RP was not associated with an increased risk of prostate cancer‐specific mortality compared with CMT (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.8, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.6–5.6, P= 0.3).
• ? Factors associated with an increased risk of prostate cancer‐specific mortality were a PSA concentration of <4 ng/mL (adjusted HR 6.1, 95% CI 2.3–16, P < 0.001) as compared with ≥4 ng/mL, and clinical category T2b, c (adjusted HR 2.9; 95% CI 1.1–7.2; P= 0.03) as compared with T1c, 2a.

CONCLUSION

• ? Initial treatment with RP as compared with CMT was not associated with an increased risk of prostate cancer‐specific mortality in men with Gleason score 8–10 prostate cancer.

     

The extent of pelvic lymph node dissection correlates with the biochemical recurrence rate in patients with intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer

Study Type – Therapy (case series) Level of Evidence 4 What’s known on the subject? and What does the study add? Pelvic lymph‐node dissection during radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer is certainly a fundamental staging procedure but its therapeutic role is yet under debate. This retrospective study suggests that, in patients with intermediate‐ and high‐risk of prostate cancer, the greater the number of lymph‐nodes removed, the lower the risk of biochemical relapse, even in the presence of 1 or 2 lymph‐node metastasis. However, the Will Rogers phenomenon must be considered due to the retrospective nature of the present study.

OBJECTIVE

• ? To assess the impact of pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) and of the number of lymph nodes (LNs) retrieved during radical prostatectomy (RP) on biochemical relapse (BCR) in pNX/0/1 patients with prostate cancer according to the clinical risk of lymph node invasion (LNI).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

• ? We evaluated 872 pT2‐4 NX/0/1 consecutive patients submitted to RP between October 1995 and June 2009, with the following inclusion criteria: (i) a follow‐up period ≥12 months; (ii) the avoidance of neoadjuvant hormonal therapy or adjuvant hormonal and/or adjuvant radiotherapy; (iii) the availability of complete follow‐up data; (iv) no pathological T0 disease; (v) complete data regarding the clinical stage and Gleason score (Gs), the preoperative prostate‐specific antigen (PSA) level and the pathological stage.
• ? The patients were stratified as having low risk (cT1a‐T2a and cGs ≤6 and PSA level < 10 ng/mL), intermediate risk (cT2b‐T2c or cGs = 7 or PSA level = 10–19.9) or high risk of LNI (cT3 or cGs = 8–10 or PSA level ≥ 20).
• ? The 872 patients were divided into two LN groups according to the number of LNs retrieved: group 1 had no LN or one to nine LNs removed; group 2 had 10 or more LNs.
• ? The variables analysed were LN group, age, PSA level, clinical and pathological stage and Gs, surgical margin status, LN status and number of LN metastases; the primary endpoint was the BCR‐free survival.

RESULTS

• ? The mean follow‐up was 55.8 months.
• ? Of all the patients, 305 (35%) were pNx and 567 (65.0%) were pN0/1.
• ? Of the 567 patients submitted to PLND, the mean number of LNs obtained was 10.9, and 49 (8.6%) were pN1.
• ? In the 402 patients at low risk of LNI, LN group was not a significant predictor of BCR at univariate analysis, while in the 470 patients at intermediate and high risk of LNI, patients with ≥10 LNs removed had a significantly lower BCR‐free survival at univariate and multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSION

• ? In our study population, a more extensive PLND positively affects the BCR‐free survival regardless of the nodal status in intermediate‐ and high‐risk prostate cancer.

     

The relationship between Prostate CAncer gene 3 (PCA3) and prostate cancer significance

Study Type – Diagnostic (exploratory cohort) Level of Evidence 2b What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? Prior studies have shown that the PCA3 Score is indicative of prostate cancer significance and may aid in selecting men with clinically insignificant prostate cancer who could be candidates for active surveillance. This analysis of data from two studies enrolling 1,009 men shows that the PCA3 Score is associated with many biopsy and pathological features of the insignificant prostate cancer. The paper also provides guidance for the use of the PAC3 Assay in clinical practice.

OBJECTIVE

• ? To evaluate the relationship between Prostate CAncer gene 3 (PCA3) and prostate cancer significance.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

• ? Clinical data from two multi‐centre European open‐label, prospective studies evaluating the clinical utility of the PCA3 assay in guiding initial and repeat biopsy decisions were analysed.
• ? First‐catch urine was collected after digital rectal examination (three strokes per lobe) and the PCA3 score was determined using the PROGENSA® PCA3 assay.
• ? Transrectal ultrasound‐guided biopsy (≥8 cores) and radical prostatectomy (RP) specimens were analysed by the local pathologist. The relationship between biopsy and RP outcomes with the PCA3 score was assessed.

RESULTS

• ? Of the 1009 men enrolled, 348 (34%) had a positive biopsy. The median and mean PCA3 scores were statistically significantly lower in men with biopsy Gleason score <7 vs ≥7, with clinical stage T1c vs T2a–T2c, T3a cancers, with ≤33% vs >33% positive biopsy cores and with ‘biopsy indolent’ vs ‘biopsy significant’ prostate cancer (indolent prostate cancer defined by biopsy Epstein criteria).
• ? In all, 175 men with a positive biopsy had a RP: median and mean PCA3 scores were statistically significantly lower in men with pathological Gleason score <7 vs ≥7, and with pathological stage T2a–T2c vs T3a–T3b cancers.

CONCLUSIONS

• ? The PCA3 score may combined with traditional tools aid in identifying men with clinically insignificant prostate cancer, as shown by biopsy and RP pathological features including biopsy Epstein criteria, who could be candidates for active surveillance.
• ? Treatment selection should be based on a combination of clinical and pathological variables. If one wants to use a threshold point to guide treatment decisions in clinical practice, a PCA3 score threshold of 20 may have the highest utility for selecting men with clinically insignificant prostate cancer in whom active surveillance may be appropriate; a PCA3 score threshold of 50 may be used to identify men at high risk of harbouring significant prostate cancer who are candidates for RP.
• ? Although the association between the PCA3 score and prostate cancer aggressiveness needs further evaluation, the inclusion of the PCA3 score into patient management strategies may provide clinicians with another tool to more accurately determine the course of treatment.

     

Biochemical outcome after high-dose-rate intensity modulated brachytherapy with external beam radiotherapy: 12 years of experience

Study Type – Therapy (case series) Level of Evidence 4 What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? Biochemical control from series in which radical prostatectomy is performed for patients with unfavorable prostate cancer and/or low dose external beam radiation therapy are given remains suboptimal. The treatment regimen of HDR brachytherapy and external beam radiotherapy is a safe and very effective treatment for patients with high risk localized prostate cancer with excellent biochemical control and low toxicity.

OBJECTIVE

• ? To investigate the long‐term oncological outcome, during the PSA era, of patients with prostate cancer who were treated using high‐dose‐rate (HDR) brachy therapy (BT) combined with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

• ? From June 1998 to April 2007, 313 patients with localized prostate cancer were treated with 46 Gy of EBRT to the pelvis with a HDR‐BT boost.
• ? The mean (median) follow‐up was 71 (68) months.
• ? Toxicity was reported according to the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Event, V.4.

RESULTS

• ? The 10‐year actuarial biochemical control was 100% for patients with no high‐risk criteria, 88% for patients with two intermediate‐risk criteria, 91% with one high‐risk criterion and 79% for patients with two to three high‐risk criteria (P= 0.004).
• ? The 10‐year cancer‐specific survival was 97% (standard deviation ±1%).
• ? The multivariate Cox regression analyses identified, Gleason score and T stage as independent prognostic factors for biochemical failure.
• ? Gleason score was the only factor to significantly affect distant metastases.
• ? Grade ≥3 late toxicity was not detected.

CONCLUSION

• ? The 10‐year results confirm the feasibility and effectiveness of EBRT with conformal HDR‐BT boost for patients with localised prostate cancer.

     

Comparison of health-related quality-of-life outcomes for African-American and Caucasian-American men after radical prostatectomy

Study Type – Therapy (outcomes) Level of Evidence 2c What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? In addition to a higher prevalence and biological aggressiveness of prostate cancer, African‐Americans tend towards narrower pelvises than Caucasians resulting in a potentially more difficult surgical dissection doing radical prostatectomy and increased positive surgical margins. In this study, there was no difference in urinary or sexual HRQL or overall satisfaction between African‐Americans and Caucasians 2 years after radical prostatectomy, suggesting that the potential technical challenges of a narrower pelvis do not translate into poorer outcomes for African‐Americans.

OBJECTIVE

• ? To determine if any differences exist in postoperative health‐related quality‐of‐life (HRQL) outcomes, e.g. erectile function and continence, after radical prostatectomy (RP) in African‐American (AA) vs Caucasian‐American (CA) men.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

• ? Between October 2000 and July 2008, 1338 CA and 56 AA men underwent open RP by a single surgeon and signed informed consent to participate in a prospective longitudinal outcomes study.
• ? The American Urological Association Symptom Score (AUA‐SS) and University of California, Los Angeles, Prostate Cancer Index (UCLA‐PCI) and a global assessment of satisfaction were self‐administered at baseline and after RP 24 months.
• ? Urinary, sexual, and satisfaction outcomes were compared at 24 months.

RESULTS

• ? AA men had significantly higher rates of hypertension and diabetes.
• ? There were no other significant baseline differences in age, co‐morbidities, body mass index, phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor use, preoperative prostate‐specific antigen level, AUA‐SS, and UCLA‐PCI scores.
• ? There were no differences in the percentage of men undergoing nerve‐sparing procedures, estimated blood loss, transfusion rates, or complication rates between the groups.
• ? At 24 months after RP the mean UCLA‐PCI urinary and sexual function and bother scores and global satisfaction scores were similar between the groups.

CONCLUSION

• ? AA and CA men experience no significant differences in urinary and sexual HRQL or overall satisfaction after open RP when performed by a single experienced surgeon.

     

Which patients are at the highest risk of dying from competing causes ≤10 years after radical prostatectomy?

Study Type – Outcomes (cohort) Level of Evidence 2b What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? Several comorbidity classifications have been investigated for their suitability to assist treatment decision‐making in men with early prostate cancer. In unselected patients, some serious comorbidities have been shown to be associated with a 10‐year competing mortality rate clearly superseding the 50% level. The present study shows that it is hardly possible to discern meaningful subsets of patients with a 10‐year risk of competing mortality of >50% by using comorbidity classifications. This finding suggests that the selecting clinicians did well in estimating the medium‐term survival probability in men referred for radical prostatectomy.

OBJECTIVE

• ? To identify subsets of patients who are most likely to die from competing causes ≤10 years after radical prostatectomy (RP).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

• ? In all, 2205 consecutive patients who underwent RP for clinically localized prostate cancer between 1992 and 2005 were studied. The 10‐year cumulative competing mortality rates were determined in several worst‐case scenarios formed by using comorbidity classifications and combinations of them.

RESULTS

• ? In this sample of men selected for RP, even those with the most severe comorbidity level had a competing mortality risk of <50% ≤10 years after RP.
• ? Depending on the comorbidity classification used, the 10‐year cumulative competing mortality rates differed between 16 and 39% in the whole sample and between 18 and 48% in men aged ≥65 years.

CONCLUSION

• ? Clinicians do well in estimating the further life span in candidates for RP. Comorbidity classifications may assist treatment choice in this population but are not able to discern meaningful subsets to be excluded from curative treatment because of a life expectancy falling below a limit of 10 years.

     

Impact of surgical margin status on prostate‐cancer‐specific mortality

Study Type – Diagnostic (exploratory cohort) Level of Evidence 2b What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? Surgical margin status at radical prostatectomy (RP) has been shown to be a predictor of disease progression and the strongest predictor of benefit from adjuvant therapy, but the impact of a positive surgical margin (PSM) on long‐term prostate‐cancer‐specific survival is unknown. The PSM rate is dependent on the pathological stage of the cancer. In a recent multicentre nomogram for 15‐year prostate‐cancer‐specific mortality (PCSM) after RP, PSM was not significantly associated with PCSM, while Gleason score and pathological stage were the only significant predictors. This has not been validated in a single centre, and PSM has been shown to vary greatly with surgical technique. This is the first study on the impact of PSM on PCSM in a single surgeon's cohort. In other centres, the decision to administer adjuvant therapy may be influenced by surgical margin status. In this cohort, men routinely did not receive adjuvant therapy, affording the unique opportunity to study the long‐term implications of a PSM.

OBJECTIVE

• ? To examine the relative impact of a positive surgical margin (PSM) and other clinicopathological variables on prostate‐cancer‐specific mortality (PCSM) in a large retrospective cohort of patients undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

• ? Between 1982 and 2011, 4569 men underwent RP performed by a single surgeon.
• ? Of the patient population, 4461 (97.6%) met all the inclusion criteria.
• ? The median (range) age was 58 (33–75) years and the median prostate‐specific antigen (PSA) was 5.4 ng/mL; RP Gleason score was ≤6 in 2834 (63.7%), 7 in 1351 (30.3%), and 8–10 in 260 (6.0%) patients; PSMs were found in 462 (10.4%) patients.
• ? Cox proportional hazards models were used to determine the impact of a PSM on PCSM.

RESULTS

• ? At a median (range) follow‐up of 10 years (1–29), 187 men (4.3%) had died from prostate cancer.
• ? The 20‐year prostate‐cancer‐specific survival rate was 75% for those with a PSM and 93% for those without.
• ? Compared with those with a negative surgical margin, men with a PSM were more likely to be older (median age 60 vs 58 years) and to have undergone RP in the pre‐PSA era (36.6% vs 11.8%). Additionally, they were more likely to have a higher PSA level (median 7.6 vs 5.2 ng/mL), a Gleason score of ≥7 (58.7% vs 33.7%), and a non‐organ‐confined tumour (90.9% vs 30.6% [P < 0.001 for all]).
• ? In a univariate model for PCSM, PSM was highly significant (hazard ratio [HR] 5.0, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.7–6.7, P < 0.001).
• ? In a multivariable model, adjusting for pathological variables and RP year, PSM remained an independent predictor of PCSM (HR 1.4, 95% CI 1.0–1.9, P= 0.036) with a modest effect relative to RP Gleason score (HR 5.7–12.6) and pathological stage (HR 2.2–11.0 [P < 0.001]).

CONCLUSION

• ? Although a PSM has a statistically significant adverse effect on prostate‐cancer‐specific survival in multivariable analysis, Gleason grade and pathological stage were stronger predictors.

     

Secondary cancers after intensity‐modulated radiotherapy,brachytherapy and radical prostatectomy for the treatment of prostate cancer: incidence and cause‐specific survival outcomes according to the initial treatment intervention

Study Type – Therapy (case series) Level of Evidence 4 What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? Radiation Therapy for prostate cancer can increase the risk for the development of second cancers after treatment. This study highlights the fact that such second cancers within the pelvis do occur but are not as common as previously reported. In this report we also note that even among patients who develop second cancers, if detected earlier, the majority are alive 5 years after the diagnosis.

OBJECTIVE

• ? To report on the incidence of secondary malignancy (SM) development after external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and brachytherapy (BT) for prostate cancer and to compare this with a cohort contemporaneously treated with radical prostatectomy (RP).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

• ? Between 1998 and 2001, 2658 patients with localized prostate cancer were treated with RP (n= 1348), EBRT (n= 897) or BT (n= 413).
• ? Using the RP cohort as a control we compared the incidence of SMs, such as rectal or bladder cancers noted within the pelvis, and the incidence of extrapelvic SMs.

RESULTS

• ? The 10‐year SM‐free survival for the RP, BT and EBRT cohorts were 89%, 87%, and 83%, respectively (RP vs EBRT, P= 0.002; RP vs BT, P= 0.37).
• ? The 10‐year likelihoods for bladder or colorectal cancer SM development in the RP, BT and EBRT groups were 3%, 2% and 4%, respectively (P= 0.29).
• ? Multivariate analysis of predictors for development of all SMs showed that older age (P= 0.01) and history of smoking (P < 0.001) were significant predictors for the development of a SM, while treatment intervention was not found to be a significant variable.
• ? Among 243 patients who developed a SM, the 5‐year likelihood of SM‐related mortality among patients with SMs in the EBRT and BT groups was 43.7% and 15.6%, respectively, compared with 26.3% in the RP cohort; P= 0.052).

CONCLUSIONS

• ? The incidence of SM after radiotherapy was not significantly different from that after RP when adjusted for patient age and smoking history.
• ? The incidence of bladder and rectal cancers was low for both EBRT‐ and BT‐treated patients.
• ? Among patients who developed a SM, the likelihood of mortality related to the SM was not significantly different among the treatment cohorts.