One year's experience with elective transfer of two good quality embryos in the human in-vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection programmes

High incidences of multiple pregnancies, after transferringa maximum of three embryos, were observed after in-vitro fertilization(IVF) treatment. In a randomized study, it was demonstratedthat, after taking into account embryo quality and other positivelyinterfering parameters, an elective transfer of two good qualityembryos does not significantly influence the pregnancy rate.The intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) technique was successfullydeveloped in the meantime and high incidences of multiple pregnancieswere also obtained after ICSI. The question arose whether afterICSI there was also room for elective double embryo transferin a well-defined patient group. This report covers 1 year of IVF and ICSI treatment and theresults are presented in relation to the number of embryos transferred.The embryo development is similar for zygotes obtained afterIVF and ICSI; for both techniques 63% of the zygotes developto type A-B embryos and 13% to type C embryos. There is alsono difference in the pregnancy rate after ICSI or IVF. Globally,after IVF, 307 out of the 766 double and triple transfers (40.1%)and 317 out of 774 double and triple transfers (40.9%) afterICSI resulted in a positive HCG. After IVF, 73.9% (227) andafter ICSI 76.3% (242) of the pregnancies were evolutive. Neitherwas there any difference between the two techniques as regardsthe implantation rate per transferred embryo. After IVF, 22.8%of the transferred embryos implanted compared with 21.8% afterICSI. When the elective double embryo transfers were compared,no difference was found between IVF and ICSI. After IVF, 102of the 211 elective double transfers (48.1%) resulted in a pregnancyversus 93 out of 225 (41.3%) after ICSI [not significant (NS)].A high implantation rate per transferred embryo (IVF: 33.2%;ICSI: 26.9%, NS) was obtained in this elective double transfercategory, as was also reported in the randomized study. Thesedata confirm the results obtained in our randomized study andthe effectiveness of the elective double embryo transfer forIVF as well as for ICSI.     

Implantation: Embryo score to predict implantation after in-vitro fertilization: based on 957 single embryo transfers

The purpose of this study was to devise an embryo score to predictthe likelihood of successful implantation after in-vitro fertilization(IVF). Unlike most studies dealing with the influence of embryostage and morphology on pregnancy, our study was based on singlerather than multiple embryo transfers. A total of 957 singleembryo transfers were carried out. No delivery was obtainedafter any of the 99 transfers using 1-cell embryos or embryosobtained after delayed fertilization. In the remaining 858 transfers,the embryos had cleaved. Higher pregnancy rates were obtainedwith embryos displaying no irregular cells (11.7 versus 6.9%;P < 0.01) and embryos displaying no fragmentation (11.5 versus8.1%; P < 0.05). The 4-cell embryos implanted 2-fold moreoften than embryos with more or less cells (15.6 versus 7.4%;P < 0.01). Based on these observations, we devised a 4-pointembryo score in which embryos are assigned 1 point each if they(i) are cleaved, (ii) present no fragmentation, (iii) displayno irregularities, and (iv) have four cells. Both pregnancyrate and take home baby rate were significantly correlated withembryo score. Each point of this score corresponds to a 4% increasein pregnancy rate. Interestingly, pregnancy rate was significantlylower in women aged >38 years (8.2 versus 11.4%; P < 0.05),even though embryo quality was similar regardless of age. Singleembryo transfer allowed us to define a simple and useful embryoscore to choose the best embryo for transfer to optimize IVFand embryo transfer outcome. The use of this embryo score coulddecrease multiple pregnancies after multiple embryo transfers.     

Fertilization and early embryology: Embryo quality and pregnancy potential of fresh compared with frozen embryos--is freezing detrimental to high quality embryos?

To determine the effect of cryopreservation on embryo qualityand the pregnancy potential of embryos, donated oocytes fromthe same donor (n = 24) were randomly allocated, with subsequenttransfer to two or more different ovum recipients resultingin at least one fresh and one frozen embryo transfer cycle fromthe same cohort of oocytes. Endometrial receptivity was controlledin all ovum recipients, and male factor patients were excluded.The number of embryos transferred, mean embryo grade transferred,number of high quality embryos (grade 2.5, grade 1 being best)transferred and embryo implantation and live birth rates arereported. Significantly more embryos (4.4 ± 1.2 versus3.3 ± 1.2, P < 0.00003) of higher quality (1.9 ±0.5 versus 2.1 ± 0.5, P < 0.013) and of a more advancedcell stage (3.0 ± 0.6 versus 2.6 ± 0.7, P <0.019) were transferred fresh than after cryopreservation respectively.Implantation rates/embryo [19/151 (12.6%) and 9/111 (8.1%)]and live birth rates/transfer [11/42 (26.2%) and 6/45 (13.3%)],from fresh and frozen transfers respectively, were not significantlydifferent despite the larger number of high quality embryostransferred fresh. Embryo cryopreservation adversely affectsembryo quality, but does not have detrimental effects on theimplantation or pregnancy potential of high quality embryos.Because of the loss of embryos during freeze — thawingduring frozen embryo cycles, every effort should be made toattempt a fresh transfer.     

Frozen embryo transfers: implications of clinical and embryological factors on the pregnancy outcome

BACKGROUND: Frozen embryo transfers are characterized by impaired pregnancy outcome and increased incidence of pregnancy loss as compared with fresh IVF/ICSI embryo transfers. In this study, we performed a retrospective analysis of clinical and embryological factors that potentially influence the outcome of frozen embryo transfer. METHODS: We reviewed the outcome of 1242 frozen embryo transfers with respect to the age of the woman, the method of fertilization, embryo quality before and after freezing and the number of embryos transferred. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: The pregnancy (positive hCG) and clinical pregnancy rates were 25.8 and 21.1%, respectively. A total of 107 (33.3%) of the 321 pregnancies identified by a positive hCG test miscarried either before (18.4%) or after (15%) the clinical recognition of gestational sac(s). The delivery rate for the frozen embryo transfers analysed was 17.2%. Our data revealed that the delivery rate after frozen embryo transfer was dependent on both the woman's age and the quality of embryos transferred, at the same time being unaffected by IVF/ICSI treatment. In addition, the increased woman's age at IVF/ICSI treatment was identified as the only parameter elevating the biochemical pregnancy rate, whereas the clinical abortion rate was found to be unrelated to the clinical or embryological parameters studied.     

Is there any benefit from the culture of a single oocyte to a blastocyst-stage embryo in unstimulated cycles?

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to test the influence of 2- and 5-day cultivation of a single oocyte on the pregnancy rate in a non-stimulated cycle. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of 391 consecutive patients undergoing IVF and intracytoplasmic sperm injection in unstimulated cycles was performed. The embryos were kept in MediCult universal IVF medium for day 2 transfers and in BlastAssist System for day 5 transfers. RESULTS: The oocyte recovery rate in the group for 2-day cultivation and in the group for 5-day cultivation was similar, being 79.4 (162/204) and 83.6% (154/187) respectively. The same is true of the fertilization rate (73.8 versus 77.7%). The blastulation rate was 52.8%. The embryo transfer rate per cycle was higher when day 2 embryos were transferred: 64.8% (105/162) compared with 35.7% (55/154) if blastocyst-stage embryos were transferred. The pregnancy rate per transferred embryo was higher when a blastocyst was transferred (40.0%) instead of a day 2 embryo (23.8%). CONCLUSION: The expected pregnancy rate calculated per embryo available on day 2 of cultivation was similar in both groups (23.8 versus 22.2%) and it was not affected by oocyte culture to the blastocyst stage.     

Impact of patients' choice for single embryo transfer of a top quality embryo versus double embryo transfer in the first IVF/ICSI cycle

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of transferring a single top quality embryo in the first IVF/ICSI cycle of patients <38 years old who chose to have one or two embryos transferred. METHODS: A total of 262 patients participated in the study, and 243 transfers were performed: 156 (64%) patients chose the transfer of a single top quality embryo, if available, and two non-top quality embryos if not available; 87 (36%) patients chose to have a double embryo transfer regardless of embryo quality. RESULTS: In the first group an ongoing pregnancy rate of 40% (63/156) with a twin pregnancy rate of 2% (1/63) was achieved. In the second group the ongoing pregnancy rate was 44% (38/87) with 26% (10/38) twin pregnancies. In the patient group with only one embryo transferred, irrespective of the patient's choice, the ongoing pregnancy rate was 43% (54/127) with no twin pregnancies. For the study population as a whole, the ongoing pregnancy rate was 42% (101/243) with 11% (11/101) twins. CONCLUSION: We conclude that the introduction of single embryo transfer in the first IVF/ICSI cycle is highly acceptable in women <38 years old.     

A prospective, randomized study comparing day 2 and day 3 embryo transfer in human IVF

It is believed that delayed transfer of embryos after IVF allows for a better selection of good quality embryos. Hence, the number of embryos and all other prognostic factors being equal, transfer of day 3 embryos should be associated with higher implantation and pregnancy rates than transfer of day 2 embryos. To investigate this hypothesis, a prospective randomized study was carried out to compare implantation and pregnancy rates between day 2 and day 3 transfers. The relationship between the embryo quality score of day 2 and day 3 embryos and their respective implantation rates was also analysed. In a 2 year period all patients undergoing infertility treatment and in whom at least seven normally fertilized oocytes were obtained were included in the study. A minimization procedure was performed taking into account the patient's age and the method of fertilization (IVF or intracytoplasmic sperm injection). By using a uniform policy of embryo transfer, the number of embryos transferred was similar in both groups. The outcome parameters were embryo quality, implantation and pregnancy rates. No difference was observed in implantation and pregnancy rates between transfers on day 2 versus day 3 (23.8 versus 23.8% and 47.9 versus 46.8% respectively). The incidence of embryos of moderate to poor quality was higher in embryos cultured for 3 days compared with those cultured for 2 days. It is concluded that the outcomes of embryo transfer in terms of implantation and pregnancy rates are comparable for day 2 and day 3 embryos, although the overall embryo quality score decreases when embryos are kept in culture till day 3.     

Does the choice of catheter for embryo transfer influence the success rate of in-vitro fertilization?

The performance of two different transfer catheters has been evaluated in 193 consecutive embryo transfers. Forty pregnancies were achieved, corresponding to a pregnancy rate of 21% of all embryo transfers. The Frydman catheter was used in 123 attempts whereas 70 embryo transfers were performed with the Tom Cat catheter. The Tom Cat catheter yielded a significantly higher pregnancy rate than the Frydman catheter (28% versus 16%; P = 0.03). The mean number of embryos transferred per attempt was similar in the two groups (2.9 +/- 0.1 and 3.0 +/- 0.1 in the Tom Cat and Frydman groups respectively) as was the quality. When more than three embryos were transferred, a pregnancy rate of 37% per embryo transfer was achieved using the Tom Cat versus 20% using the Frydman catheters (P = 0.03). A higher frequency of difficult transfer procedures was observed when the Frydman catheter was used while the Tom Cat performed much better in difficult cases. An alternate use of the two catheters suggests a significantly better performance of the Tom Cat catheter in relation to the efficiency of establishing pregnancy.     

The use of intra-endometrial embryo transfer for increasing the pregnancy rate

It has been demonstrated previously that pregnancy can be achievedby the direct insertion of embryos into the endometrial stroma(intra-endometrial embryo transfer) of mice. In this study weevaluated whether intra-endometrial transfer resulted in a higherpregnancy rate than conventional embryo transfer. Mouse blastocysts(ICR strain), recovered on day 4 of pregnancy, were transferredinto pseudopregnant day 2, day 3 and day 4 mice of the samestrain; 1-, 2- and 8-cell embryos were also transferred intopseudopregnant day 4 mice. In intra-endometrial embryo transfer,a 27 gauge injection needle was inserted near the utero-tubaljunction into the endometrial stroma and then removed; one blastocystwas transferred into each uterine horn with a glass micropipette.Conventional transfers were performed simultaneously as controls.The pregnancy rates and embryonic viability rates were evaluated9 days after embryo transfer. Furthermore, the rates of livebirth for intra-endometrial and conventional embryo transferswere compared when blastocysts were transferred into pseudopregnantday 4 uteri by both methods. In the transfer to pseudopregnantday 2 recipients, the pregnancy and embryonic viability rateswere significantly higher (P < 0.01) in intra-endometrial[23.4 (11/47) versus 15.9% (15/94)] than in conventional embryotransfer [4.3 (2/46) versus 2.2% (2/92)]. In the transfer topseudopregnant day 3 recipients, both rates were also higher(P < 0.01) in intra-endometrial [90.9 (40/44) versus 87.5%(77/88)] than in conventional transfer [67.4 (31/46) versus64.1% (59/ 92)]. In synchronous transfer to pseudopregnant day4 recipients, there was no difference between methods in thepregnancy rate [conventional, 48.9% (24/49); intraendometrial,50.9% (29/57)] and the embryonic viability rate [conventional,44.9% (44/98); intra-endometrial, 43.0% (49/114)]. In the transferof 1-, 2- and 8-cell embryos into pseudopregnant day 4 mice,pregnancy and embryonic viability rates were very low in bothtransfer methods. Intra-endometrial transfer produced normalliving offspring at a similar rate to conventional transfer.These results reveal that intra-endometrial transfer increasespregnancy and embryonic viability rates in asynchronous embryotransfer in mice, especially when the duration of pseudopregnancyin the recipients was less than the age of the transferred embryos.     

Prospective evaluation of simple morphological criteria for embryo selection in double embryo transfer cycles

Preventing the occurrence of high-rank multiple pregnancieswithout reducing the pregnancy rate remains a high priorityof in-vitro fertilization and embryo transfer programmes. Ourprevious study demonstrated that, if there is at least one embryowith a good morphological grade, then the transfer of two (adouble embryo transfer) instead of three embryos does not resultin a lower pregnancy rate, and that the influence of the numberof embryos transferred becomes significant only when poor-qualityembryos are transferred. This result allowed us to employ thesimple policy of systematically selecting double embryo transfercycles without affecting the pregnancy rate. Since January 1994,when patients <37 years of age had more than two embryosavailable for transfer, only two instead of three embryos weretransferred if at least one of the embryos demonstrated a goodmorphological grade. After a 1 year application of this policy,of the 147 cycles (group A) that fulfilled the above criteria,two embryos were transferred in 92 cycles, while three embryoswere transferred in the other 55 cycles. The results of thesecycles were compared to those of the control 144 cycles (groupB) in which three embryos were transferred, prior to the applicationof this policy. The on-going pregnancy rates and the incidenceof multiple and triplet pregnancies were 24% and 28%, 22% and23%, and 2% and 9% in groups A and B respectively. The rateswere not significantly different. In conclusion, although ourprospective trial demonstrated a tendency of decreasing pregnancyrate and an invariable incidence of multiple pregnancies, thevery low occurrence of triplets during this period indicatedthat this policy provided a practical compromise between achievinga high pregnancy rate and an acceptable incidence of tripletpregnancies.     

Fertilization and early embryology: The applicability of the cumulative embryo score system for embryo selection and quality control in an in-vitro fertilization/embryo transfer programme

The cumulative embryo score system involves three aspects ofrelevance in pregnancy achievement during in-vitro fertilization(IVF) and embryo transfer: cleavage rates, morphological qualitiesand the number of embryos transferred. The scores of 602 IVF/embryotransfer trials were calculated and analysed to determine thesystem's relationship to pregnancy rate, pregnancy outcome andthe incidence of twin and triplet pregnancies. The system wasalso applied to cycles where endotoxins were either presentin or absent from culture medium, in order to evaluate its validityin quality control analyses. Pregnancy rates were found to increasefrom 4%, with scores between 1 and 10, to 35% in the 41–50group. The score of 20 was the criterion for separating patientsinto poor and good pregnancy prognosis groups (P = 0.00001).Biochemical abortions occurred more frequently with scores <20(P = 0.00978), but a similar relationship was not found in clinicalabortion rates (P = 0.62206). Birth rates below and above ascore of 20 (2.8 and 19.2%, respectively) differed significantly(P = 0.0005). The scores of twins overlapped extensively withthose of singleton births, but those of all triplets were >40. The system did not reflect a correlation between embryoquality and the presence of endotoxins in culture medium.     

Elective single embryo transfer: the value of cryopreservation

In-vitro fertilization is associated with a high rate of multiple pregnancies, a consequence of the number of embryos transferred. There is a challenge in avoiding even twin pregnancies in assisted reproduction, and this can be accomplished with elective single embryo transfer and a good cryopreservation programme. In our follow-up study, we analysed all our elective single embryo transfers during 1998-1999. In all these cycles at least one embryo was frozen. A total of 127 elective single embryo transfers were performed with a clinical pregnancy rate of 38.6%. The highest implantation rate was obtained with four-cell embryos with <10% fragmentation (39.8%). Thirty-four patients have delivered (26.8%), one of these being a monozygotic pregnancy. In total 129 frozen-thawed cycles have been achieved in 83 patients. One frozen-thawed embryo has been transferred in 46 cycles with a clinical pregnancy rate of 17.4%, and two embryos have been transferred in 83 cycles, with a clinical pregnancy rate of 37.3%. Up until now, 66 of 125 patients in our single embryo transfer programme have delivered or have on-going pregnancies, and 77 still have embryos frozen. The cumulative delivery rate per oocyte retrieval is 52.8% and the twin rate 7.6%. We conclude that elective single embryo transfer with a good cryopreservation programme results in very acceptable pregnancy rates with a low risk of twins. This is a cost-effective practice that substantially reduces all risks associated with multiple pregnancies and lowers the cost per delivery.     

Prevention of twin pregnancy after in-vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection based on strict embryo criteria: a prospective randomized clinical trial.

A prospective randomized study comparing single embryo transfer with double embryo transfer after in-vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI) was carried out. First, top quality embryo characteristics were delineated by retrospectively analysing embryos resulting in ongoing twins after double embryo transfer. A top quality embryo was characterized by the presence of 4 or 5 blastomeres at day 2 and at least 7 blastomeres on day 3 after insemination, the absence of multinucleated blastomeres and <20% cellular fragments on day 2 and day 3 after fertilization. Using these criteria, a prospective study was conducted in women <34 years of age, who started their first IVF/ICSI cycle. Of 194 eligible patients, 110 agreed to participate of whom 53 produced at least two top quality embryos and were prospectively randomized. In all, 26 single embryo transfers resulted in 17 conceptions, 14 clinical and 10 ongoing pregnancies [implantation rate (IR) = 42.3%; ongoing pregnancy rate (OPR) = 38.5%] with one monozygotic twin; 27 double embryo transfers resulted in 20 ongoing conceptions with six (30%) twins (IR = 48.1%; OPR = 74%). We conclude that by using single embryo transfer and strict embryo criteria, an OPR similar to that in normal fertile couples can be achieved after IVF/ICSI, while limiting the dizygotic twin pregnancy rate to its natural incidence of <1% of all ongoing pregnancies.     

Elective single day 3 embryo transfer halves the twinning rate without decrease in the ongoing pregnancy rate of an IVF/ICSI programme

BACKGROUND: Data on the effect of elective single embryo transfer (eSET) on the total and multiple pregnancy rates of an IVF/ICSI programme are reported. METHODS AND RESULTS: A retrospective cohort analysis of eSET was carried out over a 4 year period. A total of 1559 cycles resulted in 1464 transfers; 299 transfers of one top quality embryo (20.4%) and 86 of one non-top quality embryo (5.9%) yielded 149 conceptions (49.8%) with 105 ongoing pregnancies (35.1%) and 26 conceptions (30.2%) with 19 ongoing implantations (22.1%) respectively; 1079 transfers of two (n = 853; 58.3%) or more than two (n = 226; 15.4%) embryos yielded 366 ongoing pregnancies (33.9%). The ongoing pregnancy rates for the years between 1998 and 2001 were 35.9, 27.9, 31.9 and 31.0% per oocyte retrieval and 38.5, 29.4, 34.1 and 33.2% per transfer. There were no differences in pregnancy rates between any of the years. The average ongoing pregnancy rate (>12 weeks) over the 4 years was 31.5% per started cycle and 33.5% per transfer; the average number of embryos transferred decreased from 2.26 (1998) to 1.79 (2001); the multiple pregnancy and twinning rates dropped from 33.6 and 29.5% (1998) to 18.6 and 16.3% (2001) respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Judicious application of eSET can halve the twinning rate while maintaining the overall pregnancy rate.     

Characterization of a top quality embryo, a step towards single-embryo transfer.

In most in-vitro fertilization (IVF)/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) programmes approximately one ongoing pregnancy in three is multiple. The need to characterize embryos with optimal implantation potential is obvious. We retrospectively examined all of 23 double transfers resulting in ongoing twins, occurring between January 1, 1996 and May 19, 1997. Characteristics of these top quality embryos were absence of multinucleated blastomeres, four or five blastomeres on day 2, seven or more cells on day 3, and 2 embryos, 11/31 (35%) were multiple. We applied our top quality criteria to the 221 double transfers: 106 transfers with two top embryos resulted in 65 (63%) ongoing pregnancies with 37 (57%) twins, 65 transfers with one top embryo in 38 (58%) ongoing pregnancies with eight (21%) twins. In the group without top embryos, 12/52 (23%) ongoing singletons occurred, with no twins. The corresponding ongoing implantation rates were 49, 35 and 12%. This analysis suggests that single embryo transfer with an acceptable pregnancy rate might be considered if a top quality embryo is available.     

Ultrasound-guided soft catheter embryo transfers will improve pregnancy rates in in-vitro fertilization

Attempts to improve clinical pregnancy rates after in-vitro fertilization (IVF) and embryo transfer are constantly being made. Two changes in technique of embryo transfer of potential clinical importance were evaluated over two contiguous time periods in order to observe any corresponding change in clinical pregnancy (CP) rate per transfer: (i) embryo transfer catheter; (ii) ultrasound guidance. Catheter choices were hard: Tefcat, Tom Cat, or Norfolk; or soft: Frydman or Wallace. Ultrasound visualization was considered to be excellent/good when the catheter could be followed from the cervix to the fundus by transabdominal ultrasound with retention of the embryo-containing fluid droplet; fair/poor if visualization could not document the sequence of events. Embryo transfers were performed in 518 cycles. CP rates per transfer using soft and hard catheters was 36 and 17% (P < 0.000) respectively. CP rates per transfer for transfers performed with and without ultrasound guidance were 38 and 25% (P < 0.002) respectively. A statistically significant difference was also noted when visualization ranks were compared. CP rates per transfer in all excellent/good ultrasound-guided transfers was 41.5 versus 16.7% for fair/poor transfers (P < 0.038). In conclusion, performance of embryo transfer with a soft catheter under ultrasound guidance with good visualization resulted in a significant increase in clinical pregnancy rates.     

Elective single embryo transfer yields good delivery rates in oocyte donation

BACKGROUND: High pregnancy rates have been noted after oocyte donation (OD). Multiple pregnancies should be avoided, because oocyte recipients have an increased risk of obstetric complications. METHODS: We analysed our OD results from 2000-2001 when elective single embryo transfer (eSET) was introduced as a recommended policy for all recipients if at least one good quality embryo was available. The results were compared with those achieved in 1998-1999, when usually two embryos were transferred (double embryo transfer, DET). Between 1998 and 2001, 100 healthy women donated oocytes and 135 fresh embryo transfers were carried out. The mean age of the donors was 31 years and that of the recipient women was 35 years. RESULTS: The proportion of eSET of all OD transfers was 17.1% in 1998-1999 and 61.0% in 2000-2001. There was no statistically significant difference in clinical pregnancy (36.8 versus 45.8%) and delivery rates (31.6 versus 33.9%) per embryo transfer between the two time periods. The proportion of twins declined from 29% (1998-1999) to 10% (2000-2001). The delivery rate was similar after eSET and DET (32.6 versus 32.1% respectively). CONCLUSIONS: By increasing the proportion of eSETs it is possible to reduce the number of twins without affecting delivery rates in oocyte recipients.     

Embryo transfer: ultrasound-guided versus clinical touch.

In this prospective control study, the pregnancy and implantation rates were compared between ultrasound-guided and clinical touch uterine embryo transfers. In addition, a subset of patients was sought that would particularly benefit from embryo transfer under ultrasound guidance. A total of 187 patients (93 ultrasound and 94 clinical touch) was enrolled. Allocation was random and depended on whether their embryo transfers were done during the 1 h each day in which the ultrasound was available. Pregnancy and implantation rates of 37.8 and 20.4% respectively were achieved when ultrasound was used, compared with 28.9 and 16.2% respectively with clinical touch. This difference was not statistically significant. There was no significant difference in the pregnancy rate when the number of embryos transferred was controlled. Older women (>/=37 years old) had an apparently higher pregnancy rate (38.1 versus 20.4%; not significant) with ultrasound guidance during embryo transfer. In the subgroup where the clinician rated the transfer procedure as difficult, there appeared to be a substantial improvement in the pregnancy rate in the group that used ultrasound (54.5 versus 10.0%; not significant). Although our results were not statistically significant, we believe that ultrasound-guided embryo transfers should be used in clinically difficult embryo transfers and in older women, as it appears to improve the pregnancy rate over clinical touch transfers.     

影响冻融胚胎临床结局的因素分析

目的探讨影响冻融胚胎移植结局的相关因素。方法收集我中心2009年570个行冻融胚胎移植周期,回顾性分析患者年龄,移植冻融胚胎质量及数量,内膜厚度对临床妊娠率、种植率、多胎率的影响。结果 Logistic回归分析表明:女方年龄、移植数、移植优质胚胎数与临床妊娠显著相关(P<0.01);多胎与女方年龄和移植数相关(P<0.01;P<0.05)。年龄<35岁的妊娠率(49.4%)明显高于≥35岁的妊娠率(37.9%)(P<0.05);移植2个胚胎的临床妊娠率(49.3%),明显高于移植1个胚胎的临床妊娠率(15.4%)(P<0.05),但与移植3个胚胎的临床妊娠率(50.0%)无差异(P>0.05);移植至少1个优胚组妊娠率(58.0%)较无优胚移植组临床妊娠率(37.5%)显著高(P<0.01)。结论女方年龄及移植的胚胎质量是影响移植后妊娠结局的关键因素。     

Elective transfer of one embryo results in an acceptable pregnancy rate and eliminates the risk of multiple birth.

To avoid multiple pregnancies without compromising pregnancy rates (PR) is a challenge in assisted reproduction. We have compared pregnancy results among 74 elective one-embryo transfers (group 2) and 94 transfers where only one embryo was available (group 1). All the fresh embryo cycles during 1997 in two clinics in Helsinki were analysed, and cumulative PR among these couples after frozen-thawed embryo transfers up to June 1998 were counted. In group 2, where at least two embryos were available for transfer, and only one was transferred on day 2 or 3, the PR per embryo transfer was 29.7%. In group 1, the PR per embryo transfer was 20.2%. In group 2, the cumulative PR after frozen-thawed embryo transfers was 47.3% per oocyte retrieval. Over the same time, 742 two-embryo transfers were carried out. The PR per embryo transfer was 29.4% in these subjects, but 23.9% of these pregnancies were twins. The implantation rates, as well as the PR, were highest when the embryos were at the four- to five-cell stage on day 2 (35.8 versus 9.7% compared with the two- to three-cell stage, P < 0.001) or at the six- to eight-cell stage on day 3 (45.5%). The PR per embryo transfer was higher when a grade 1 or 2 embryo was transferred compared with a grade three embryo (34. 0 and 26.7% versus 8.8% respectively, P < 0.05). In women 35 years or younger, the PR per elective one-embryo transfer was 32.8%. The corresponding figure in women older than 35 years was 18.8%. On the basis of these results, elective one-embryo transfer can be highly recommended, at least in subjects who are younger than 35 years of age, and who have grade one or grade two embryos available for transfer.