Classic and vigorous achalasia: a comparison of manometric, radiographic, and clinical findings

Compared with classic achalasia, vigorous achalasia has been defined as achalasia with relatively high esophageal contraction amplitudes, often with minimal esophageal dilation and prominent tertiary contractions on radiographs, and with the presence of chest pain. However, no study using current manometric techniques has compared manometric, radiographic, and clinical findings in vigorous and classic achalasia or questioned the usefulness of making this distinction. Fifty-four cases involving patients with achalasia whose radiographic and manometric studies were performed within 6 months of each other were available for review. Patients with vigorous achalasia (n = 17), defined by amplitude greater than or equal to 37 mm Hg, and patients with classic achalasia (n = 37), defined as amplitude less than 37 mm Hg, had substantial overlap in radiographic parameters of esophageal dilation, tortuosity, and tertiary contractions. Manometric properties of repetitive waves and lower esophageal sphincter pressure and clinical aspects of chest pain, dysphagia, heartburn, and satisfactory responses to pneumatic dilation were similar in both forms of achalasia. A separate analysis of patients with mean contraction amplitude greater than 60 mm Hg revealed similar findings. It is concluded that use of amplitude as a criterion for classifying achalasia is arbitrary and of dubious value.     

Proximal and distal esophageal contractions in patients with vigorous or classic esophageal Chagas' disease

BACKGROUND: Some patients with achalasia have distal esophageal contraction amplitude in the normal range, a condition called vigorous achalasia, and others have low contraction amplitude, a condition named classic achalasia. The difference in distal contraction amplitude may also be associated with a difference in proximal contraction amplitude. AIM: To study the proximal and distal esophageal contractions in patients with Chagas' disease. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We studied 28 patients with Chagas' disease, all with dysphagia and an esophageal radiologic examination with retention without dilation, and 18 controls. The patients with Chagas' disease had vigorous achalasia (distal amplitude over 34 mm Hg, n = 13) or classic achalasia (distal amplitude below 34 mm Hg, n = 15). We measured the contractions by the manometric method with continuous perfusion at 2, 7, 12 and 17 cm below the upper esophageal sphincter after five swallows of a 5 mL bolus of water. RESULTS: There was no difference in proximal amplitude of contractions between classic or vigorous achalasia, and controls. In the proximal esophagus there was also no difference in duration or area under curve of contractions. In the distal esophagus, duration and area under curve were lower in classic than vigorous disease. Failed and simultaneous contractions were more frequent in patients than controls. Simultaneous contractions were seen more frequently in classic disease, and peristaltic contractions were seen more frequently in vigorous disease. CONCLUSION: We did not find differences in proximal esophageal contractions of patients with classical or vigorous esophageal Chagas' disease, except for the higher number of simultaneous contractions seen in classic disease.     

Vigorous achalasia in Chagas'' disease

The study investigated the esophageal motility of 98 patients with Chagas' disease and 40 asymptomatic volunteers, with the objective of comparing patients with vigorous achalasia (distal amplitude contractions >/= 37 mmHg) and patients with classical achalasia (amplitude < 37 mmHg). The Chagas' disease patients had normal esophageal radiologic transit (n=60) or esophageal slow transit and retention without dilation (n=38). The manometric method with continuous perfusion was used to study esophageal motility. Comparison of classical and vigorous achalasia showed no difference in duration of contractions, lower and upper esophageal sphincter pressure, proportion of patients with dysphagia, or the number of multipeaked contractions. The number of failed contractions was higher in patients with classic achalasia than in patients with vigorous achalasia. We conclude that the distinction between classical and vigorous achalasia does not seem to be important for the classification of Chagas' disease.     

Peppermint oil improves the manometric findings in diffuse esophageal spasm.

BACKGROUND: Diffuse esophageal spasm (DES) is an uncommon condition that results in simultaneous esophageal contractions. Current medical treatment of DES is frequently unsatisfactory. We hypothesized that, as a smooth muscle relaxant, peppermint oil may improve the manometric findings in DES. STUDY: Eight consecutive patients with chest pain or dysphagia and who were found to have DES were enrolled during their diagnostic esophageal manometry. An eight-channel perfusion manometry system was used. Lower esophageal sphincter pressure and contractions of the esophageal body after 10 wet swallows were assessed before and 10 minutes after the ingestion of a solution containing five drops of peppermint oil in 10 mL of water. Each swallow was assessed for duration (seconds), amplitude (mm Hg), and proportion of simultaneous and multiphasic esophageal contractions. RESULTS: Lower esophageal sphincter pressures and contractile pressures and durations in both the upper and lower esophagus were no different before and after the peppermint oil. Peppermint oil completely eliminated simultaneous esophageal contractions in all patients (p < 0.01). The number of multiphasic, spontaneous, and missed contractions also improved. Because normal esophageal contractions are characteristically uniform in appearance, variability of esophageal contractions was compared before and after treatment. The variability of amplitude improved from 33.4 +/- 36.7 to 24.9 +/- 11.0 mm Hg (p < 0.05) after the peppermint oil. The variability for duration improved from 2.02 +/- 1.80 to 1.36 +/- 0.72 seconds (p < 0.01). Two of the eight patients had chest pain that resolved after the peppermint oil. CONCLUSIONS: This data demonstrates that peppermint oil improves the manometric features of DES.     

Clinical and manometric findings on elderly patients with achalasia

Introduction: Data regarding the age impact on the clinical presentation and esophageal motility in adults with idiopathic achalasia are scarce. Objective: To asses the clinical and manometric features of elderly patients with idiopathic achalasia. Methods: The medical charts of 159 patients diagnosed with achalasia were divided into two groups according to the patients' age: ?60 years (n = 123) and >60 years (n = 36). Clinical and manometric findings [esophageal body aperistalsis, basal lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure and abnormal LES relaxation] of both groups were compared upon diagnosis. Patients with previous esophageal interventions were excluded. Results: Only chest pain was more common in the ?60 year-old group (51.2% vs. 22.2%, p <0.003). This difference remained when comparing the group of men ?60 years. Other presenting features (including sex, weight loss, and presence of dysphagia, regurgitation and heartburn) did not differ between the groups. The LES relaxation was incomplete in 70.4% of the cases. No differences on the basal LES pressure, residual LES pressure or the amplitude of the esophageal body contractions between both groups were found. Considering only the classic achalasia cases, symptomatic time before diagnosis was greater in ?60 years compared with older patients: 24 vs. 12 months (p <0.05), respectively. Conclusions: These results suggest that chest pain is more common in younger male achalasia patients and residual LES pressure decreases with age.     

Characterization of Esophageal Striated Muscle in Patients with Achalasia

Many studies have been conducted analyzing the manometric properties of patients with achalasia, but the striated portion of the esophagus has never been analyzed and is often overlooked. We retrospectively reviewed 120 manometric tracings (20 achalasia, 100 controls) performed between 1994 and 1997 and excluded tracings from patients with chronic cough and nutcracker esophagus. The data were assessed for age, sex, symptoms, duration of symptoms, lower esophageal sphincter pressure, gastroesophageal gradient, upper esophageal sphincter pressure, smooth muscle contraction amplitude and duration, striated muscle contraction amplitude and duration, length from upper esophageal sphincter to maximal striated muscle contraction, and esophageal length. The maximum striated muscle contraction amplitude was significantly decreased in achalasia patients with a median amplitude of 45 mm Hg (range 12–95) vs 76 mm Hg (range 30–210) in the control group (P = 0.002). Although the wave forms were similar, the maximum striated muscle contraction duration and the distance from the upper esophageal sphincter in achalasia patients was not significantly different from controls. The length of the esophagus was significantly longer in achalasia patients with a median value of 25 cm (range 21–30) vs 21 cm (range 17–26) in the control group (P < 0.001). Patients with achalasia have significantly lower maximum striated muscle contraction amplitudes and longer esophagi, but the duration of the contractions and the configuration of the wave forms are not different.     

The effects of pentagastrin in achalasia and diffuse esophageal spasm.

The effects of subcutaneous pentagastrin (6 microgram/kg) on esophageal motility were recorded in patients with achalasia, in patients with idiopathic diffuse esophageal spasm (IDES), and in healthy subjects. In achalasia and IDES, pentagastrin produced an increase in mean lower esophageal sphincter pressure, amplitude of contractions, esophageal pressure, and repetitive wave activity. Also, chest pain or dysphagia occurred after pentagastrin administration in 4 of 9 patients with IDES and in 7 of 12 patients with achalasia. After comparing these observations with those of healthy subjects, we tested the potential for pentagastrin-induced motility changes to improve our ability to diagnose IDES. This was done by administering pentagastrin to 22 patients with clinically "suspected" esophageal motor disease but in whom routine radiologic and manometric studies were nondiagnostic. In none of the 22 did symptoms or manometric changes develop to help establish the diagnosis of IDES. This was true despite additional studies in 10 patients that failed to provide an alternative to IDES as the diagnosis. These results do not support the use of pentagastrin as a provocative test for IDES.     

Manometry and impedance characteristics of achalasia. Facts and myths

BACKGROUND: Achalasia is defined manometrically by an aperistaltic esophagus. Variations in the manometric findings occur in achalasia suggesting that all manometric features should not be required to diagnose achalasia. Combined multichannel intraluminal impedance and esophageal manometry (MII-EM) allows both a functional and a manometric evaluation of esophageal motility and identifies chronic fluid retention. AIM: To compare manometric and MII characteristics in patients with achalasia. METHODS: Retrospective review of 73 MII-EM tracings from patients with achalasia done in our laboratory between October 2001 and December 2004 (38 females; mean age=53.5 y). Patients with previous esophageal interventions were excluded. Manometric and MII characteristics were identified and compared during 10 liquid and 10 viscous swallows. Patients were also divided into 2 groups: vigorous achalasia (VA) and achalasia. RESULTS: Twenty-two of the seventy-one (31%) achalasia patients had a hypertensive lower esophageal sphincter (LES). The mean lower esophageal sphincter pressure (LESP) for the 71 patients with achalasia was 37.9+/-21.2 mm Hg compared with 27.3+/-9.3 mm Hg (P<0.05) in the 73 patients with normal motility. The mean LESP in patients with achalasia was 36+/-20.3 mm Hg compared with 47+/-23.2 mm Hg (P<0.05) in patients with VA. Elevated intraesophageal pressure (IEP) was noted in 45/73 (61.6%). The mean LESP in this group was 41.1+/-22.9 mm Hg compared with 32.5+/-17 mm Hg (P<0.05) with normal IEP. The mean baseline impedance for achalasia was 801+/-732 compared with 1265.2+/-829.5 Omega (P<0.05) for the VA patients. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients with achalasia have elevated IEP, elevated LES residual pressure, normal LES pressure, and low baseline impedance. All manometric features should not be required to diagnose achalasia. Patients with an elevated IEP are likely to have an elevated LES pressure and LES residual pressure. Low MII values identify chronic fluid retention and helps confirm the diagnosis.     

Manometric and Radiologic Correlations in Achalasia

Achalasia is an esophageal motor disorder distinguished by clinical, radiologic, and manometric features. To evaluate the correlation among these features, we studied 109 achalasia patients. The four most common clinical complaints, the four most commonly encountered radiologic findings, and two manometric parameters were analyzed with a correlation matrix test and a multiple regression analysis. Significant correlation existed among symptoms of dysphagia, regurgitation, and weight loss. In contrast, chest pain inversely correlated with these symptoms. Dysphagia and weight loss significantly correlated with a bird-beak deformity but not with esophageal dilatation or a sigmoid esophagus. Moreover, no significant relationship between lower esophageal sphincter pressure and esophageal dilatation or sphincter pressure and sigmoid esophagus was found. However, in those patients with a resting lower esophageal sphincter pressure greater than 45 mm Hg, a reasonable correlation among clinical, radiologic, and manometric parameters did exist. In conclusion, although in a subset of patients with markedly increased lower esophageal sphincter pressure, a good correlation between clinical, radiologic, and manometric findings exists, such a correlation cannot be established in all of the achalasia patients; esophageal dilatation or a sigmoid esophagus may not be due to a hypertensive sphincter, and their presence must not necessarily be interpreted as an indication of severity of the disease; there is an inverse correlation between chest pain and symptoms of dysphagia, regurgitation, and weight loss; and finally, achalasia and hiatal hernia may coexist in 6% of the patients.     

Manometric diagnosis of diffuse esophageal spasm

There are no requirements concerning the amplitude of simultaneous contractions among the present criteria for the manometric diagnosis of diffuse esophageal spasm. The purpose of this investigation was to determine whether the current criteria effectively identify an appropriately homogeneous patient population. Sixty consecutive motility tracings that met the criteria for diffuse esophageal spasm were evaluated. A bimodal distribution of the highest simultaneous esophageal contraction for each patient was observed. One group's (N=29) highest simultaneous esophageal contractile amplitude was 74 mm Hg, the other's (N=31) highest simultaneous esophageal contractile amplitude was 100 mm Hg. Group 1 had significantly decreased lower esophageal sphincter pressure, lower peristaltic amplitude, more aperistalsis, fewer simultaneous contractions, and fewer complaints of chest pain. These comparisons suggest that consideration be given to the amplitude of simultaneous esophageal contractions in the manometric diagnosis of diffuse esophageal spasm.     

Esophageal manometry: a comparison of findings in younger and older patients

Objective: We sought to determine the utility of esophageal manometry in an older patient population.
Methods: Consecutively performed manometry studies (470) were reviewed and two groups were chosen for the study, those ≥ 75 yr of age (66 patients) and those ≤ 50 years (122 patients). Symptoms, manometric findings (lower esophageal sphincter [LES], esophageal body, upper esophageal sphincter [UES]) and diagnoses were compared between the groups.
Results: Dysphagia was more common (60.6% vs 25.4%), and chest pain was less common (17.9 vs 26.2%) in older patients. In the entire group, there were no differences in LES parameters. Older patients with achalasia had lower LES residual pressures after deglutition (2.7 vs 12.0 mm Hg), but had similar resting pressures (31.4 vs 35.2 mm Hg) compared with younger achalasia patients. Duration and amplitude of peristalsis were similar in both groups, whereas peristaltic sequences were more likely to be simultaneous in the older group (15% vs 4%). The UES had a lower resting pressure in the older patients (49.6 vs 77.6 mm Hg) and a higher residual pressure (2.0 vs −2.7 mm Hg). The older patients were less likely to have normal motility (30.3% vs 44.3%) and were more likely to have achalasia (15.2% vs 4.1%) or diffuse esophageal spasm (16.6% vs 5.0%). When only patients with dysphagia were analyzed, achalasia was still more likely in the older group (20.0% vs 12.9%).
Conclusions: When older patients present with dysphagia, esophageal manometry frequently yields a diagnosis to help explain their symptoms.     

Comparison of Hypertonic Glucose to Other Provocative Tests in Patients with Noncardiac Chest Pain

The effect of hypertonic glucose as a provocative test was studied in 51 patients with noncardiac chest pain, 15 patients with esophagitis, and 16 asymptomatic controls. It was compared to esophageal perfusion with 0.1 N HCl and saline and intravenous administration of 10 mg edrophonium. Continuous esophageal manometric recordings were performed at the time of testing. The patients' symptoms were monitored every minute. The effect of these solutions and edrophonium on lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure and amplitude of esophageal contractions was also evaluated. Esophageal perfusion with hypertonic glucose, saline, or acid had no significant effect on LES pressure or amplitude of esophageal contractions in most patients. Edrophonium, however, resulted in a significant rise in the amplitude of esophageal contractions and the LES pressure in all groups studied. Hypertonic glucose resulted in chest pain in 13.6% of patients with noncardiac chest pain and 20% of those with esophagitis, whereas edrophonium reproduced the pain in 38.7 and 37%, respectively. Our results indicate that hypertonic glucose is not effective as a provocative test for noncardiac chest pain nor does it contribute to the chest pain in esophagitis. They also had no significant effect on the amplitude of esophageal contractions or LES pressure. Edrophonium continues to be a relatively sensitive test for noncardiac chest pain.     

Manometric heterogeneity in patients with idiopathic achalasia

BACKGROUND & AIMS: In certain cases of achalasia, particularly those in early stages with minimal endoscopic or radiographic abnormalities, the diagnosis may rely on manometry, which is the most sensitive test for the disease. The aim of this study was to critically evaluate the manometric criteria in a population of patients with idiopathic achalasia. METHODS: Clinical histories and manometric recordings of 58 patients with idiopathic achalasia and 43 control subjects were analyzed with regard to esophageal body contraction amplitude, peristaltic effectiveness in terms of both completeness and propagation velocity, lower esophageal sphincter (LES) resting pressure, LES relaxation pressure, and intraesophageal-intragastric pressure gradient. Variants of achalasia were defined by finding manometric features that significantly differed from the remainder of achalasia patients, such that the diagnosis might be questioned. RESULTS: Four manometrically distinct variants were identified. These variants were characterized by (1) the presence of high amplitude esophageal body contractions, (2) a short segment of esophageal body aperistalsis, (3) retained complete deglutitive LES relaxation, and (4) intact transient LES relaxation. In each instance, the most extreme variant is discussed and compared with the remainder of the achalasia population and with controls. CONCLUSIONS: The significance in defining these variants of achalasia lies in the recognition that these sometimes confusing manometric findings are consistent with achalasia when combined with additional clinical data supportive of the diagnosis. Furthermore, such variants provide important clues into the pathophysiology of this rare disorder.     

Elevated Intraesophageal Pressure in Patients with Achalasia: A Common and Important Manometric Finding

There is a subgroup of patients with achalasia in which manometry shows elevated intraesophageal pressure, expressed by elevation of esophageal baseline relative to gastric pressure. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of elevated intraesophageal pressure in patients with achalasia and its relationship to clinical, radiographic, endoscopic, and other manometric findings. Manometric studies of 62 patients with achalasia were analyzed and elevated intraesophageal pressure was considered any positive elevation of esophageal baseline relative to gastric pressure. Multiple regression analysis was used to determine independent risk factors associated with elevated intraesophageal pressure. Elevated intraesophageal pressure was found in 32 patients (51.6%). Lower esophageal sphincter pressure was the only independent variable associated with elevated intraesophageal pressure (P = 0.0167). Mean lower esophageal sphincter pressure was significantly higher in patients with elevated compared to those with normal intraesophageal pressure (34 +/- 1.96 vs 26.5 +/- 1.73 mm Hg; P = 0.006). In addition, lower esophageal sphincter pressure had a positive correlation with intraesophageal pressure (r = 0.49, P < 0.001). Conversely, no correlation was found between elevated intraesophageal pressure and various symptoms, disease duration, radiologic dilation, a finding of retained fluid during endoscopy, and esophageal length. We conclude that elevated intraesophageal pressure is a common manometric finding in patients with achalasia, with a prevalence of 51.6%, and is associated with significantly higher lower esophageal sphincter pressure.     

Effect of cimetropium bromide on esophageal motility and transit in patients affected by primary achalasia

The effect of cimetropium bromide, a new anticholinergic agent, in patients with primary achalasia was studied. Twenty such patients (12 females and 8 males, mean age 38 years, range 15–56) were studied. Diagnosis was performed by radiology, endoscopy, and manometry. Lower esophageal sphincter pressure and body wave amplitude were measured by means of a five-channel catheter constantly perfused by a low-compliance pneumohydraulic pump. Patient received cimetropium bromide 10 mg intravenously over 3 min or placebo in a double-blind manner. In five patients esophageal transit evaluated by scintiscanning was studied on separate occasions after cimetropium bromide or placebo. Baseline mean lower esophageal sphincter pressure was 46±5 mm Hg and mean amplitude of body waves was 30±8 mm Hg. Cimetropium bromide induced a significant decrease in sphincter pressure and body wave amplitude that measured 13±3 mm Hg and 8±4 mm Hg, respectively, 15 min after the end of infusion. The decrease was maintained for 45±5 min. A marked reduction in repetitive body waves was also noted. Esophageal transit was also accelerated with cimetropium bromide. Maximal stomach radioactivity was observed after 8±1.8 sec while with placebo this was reached after 65±1.5 sec (P<0.01). It is concluded that cimetropium bromide reduces LES pressure and shortens transit in primary esophageal achalasia. It may be useful in the treatment of this esophageal motility disorder.     

Surgical myotomy in patients with high-amplitude peristaltic esophageal contractions

High-amplitude peristaltic esophageal contractions, or the nutcracker esophagus, may be associated with chest pain or dysphagia. Medical treatment for this disorder is sometimes not satisfactory. We report the manometric and clinical effects of myotomy in four patients with high-amplitude peristaltic contractions who underwent surgery because of the severity of their symptoms and recalcitrance to various medical treatments. Manometry 1-5 years after surgery showed a reduction in amplitude, duration, and percent bipeaked waves at 5 and 10 cm above the lower esophageal sphincter. Peristalsis was abolished or decreased in the distal 10 cm of the esophageal body but was not affected more proximally. Lower esophageal sphincter pressure was decreased in all patients. The manometric changes were least marked in one patient, who was the only one who had some chest pain when last seen five years after myotomy. We conclude that in severely symptomatic patients with high-amplitude peristaltic contractions, myotomy results in marked manometric changes and marked clinical improvement. Patients with this disorder and whose chest pain is recalcitrant to extensive medical therapy may be successfully treated by surgical myotomy.     

Abnormal Esophageal Pressures in Reflux Esophagitis: Cause or Effect?

Thirteen patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease underwent esophageal manometric evaluation during acute exacerbations and disease remission to evaluate lower esophageal sphincter and peristaltic pressure in response to treatment. No change was noted in lower esophageal sphincter pressure (15.2 +/- 2.6 mg versus 14.3 +/- 1.8 mm Hg) or peristaltic pressure (64.1 +/- 6.9 versus 62.1 +/- 7/8 mm Hg) with remission while both lower esophageal sphincter pressure and distal amplitude were lower in reflux patients than controls (p less than 0.05). Short-term treatment resulting in endoscopic and symptom improvement of gastroesophageal reflux disease does not appear to improve lower esophageal sphincter and peristaltic pressure.     

Hypocontraction of the esophagus in patients with Chagas' disease and with primary achalasia

The esophageal contraction amplitude is low in patients with Chagas' disease and patients with primary achalasia but not every swallow is followed by low contraction amplitude. We evaluated the number of low contraction amplitude in 40 normal volunteers, 99 Chagas' disease patients and 14 patients with primary achalasia. Each subject performed 10 swallows of a 5 mL bolus of water and the esophageal motility was measured at 5, 10 and 15 cm above the lower esophageal sphincter by the manometric method with continuous perfusion. The amplitude of contraction was considered to be low when its value was below 30 mm Hg. There was a hypotensive contraction when the amplitude was low or when the contraction failed. The number of hypotensive contractions was higher in patients with Chagas' disease and patients with achalasia than in healthy volunteers (P < 0.05). Patients with Chagas' disease and abnormal esophageal radiological examination but without dilation had more frequent hypotensive contraction than patients with normal esophageal radiologic examination (P < 0.01). The same results were obtained for subjects with three or more hypotensive contractions (P < 0.01). The patients with Chagas' disease and dysphagia had more hypotensive contractions than patients without dysphagia (P < 0.05). We conclude that patients with Chagas' disease and patients with primary achalasia have a higher number of hypotensive contractions following wet swallows than normal volunteers, a fact that should influence the symptomatology of the patients.     

Inconsistent association of esophageal symptoms, psychometric abnormalities and dysmotility

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to characterize the psychometric profiles of symptomatic patients with abnormal esophageal motility and symptomatic patients with normal manometric findings compared to asymptomatic controls. METHODS: A total of 113 patients with abnormal esophageal motility (7 achalasia, 8 diffuse esophageal spasm, 27 nutcracker esophagus, 37 hypertensive lower esophageal sphincter, 21 hypotensive peristalsis, 13 failed peristalsis), 23 symptomatic controls with similar esophageal symptoms but normal manometry, and 27 asymptomatic controls were enrolled. Validated questionnaires assessing depression (Beck Depression Inventory), anxiety (Spielberger State Anxiety Inventory or Trait Anxiety Inventory), and somatization (Psychosomatic Symptom Checklist) were administered to all subjects. RESULTS: Patients with both esophageal symptoms and either hypertensive lower esophageal sphincter, nutcracker esophagus, or hypotensive contractions exhibited increased somatization, acute anxiety, or depression compared to asymptomatic controls but not compared to symptomatic controls. On the other hand, the psychometric profiles of patients with achalasia and diffuse esophageal spasm were strikingly normal. Among esophageal symptoms, chest pain was closely correlated with psychometric abnormalities. CONCLUSIONS: The esophageal symptoms of patients with abnormal esophageal motility may relate to the underlying psychological abnormalities, independent of manometric abnormalities.     

Radiographic and manometric correlation in achalasia with apparent relaxation of the lower esophageal sphincter

We compared the clinical, radiographic, and manometric findings in 10 patients with atypical achalasia showing complete lower esophageal sphincter (LES) relaxation to 39 patients with classic achalasia (i.e., incomplete LES relaxation). Those with atypical achalasia were younger (46.1 vs 60.6 years), had dysphagia of shorter duration (18.7 vs 45.7 mos), had lost less weight (8.2 vs 21.5 lbs), and had less esophageal dilatation (2.8 vs 3.9 cm). However, the mean LES pressures (34.5 vs 37.7 mmHg) and the esophagogastric junction calibers (4.5 vs 4.8 mm) were similar. Radionuclide esophageal emptying studies were done in 15 patients (6 with atypical achalasia; 9 with classic achalasia) and were abnormal in all. Most patients in both groups (90 and 92%) responded well to pneumatic dilatation. We conclude that achalasia with apparent LES relaxation may represent an early form of this motor disorder and that the radiographic findings remain characteristic except for less dilatation of the esophagus.