Late cytomegalovirus disease following liver transplantation

The widespread use of antiviral prophylaxis or preemptive therapy among orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) recipients has reduced the occurrence of early cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease. Late disease is increasingly reported. Little is known about CMV disease occurring beyond the first year after transplantation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the occurrence of CMV disease two or more years after OLT and to determine its risk factors and clinical features. Eighty-one consecutive OLT recipients followed for 2 years or longer after transplantation were included in the study. Data were collected on demographic and clinical variables, clinical presentation, treatment, and outcome of late CMV disease. Late CMV disease occurred in 7/81 liver recipients (8.5%) at a mean time of 5.9 years after OLT (range: 3.5--9.3, median: 6.3 years). All seven patients were women, with a mean age of 47.7 years (range: 26--60, median: 59 years). There was no association between the development of late CMV disease and the occurrence of rejection episodes, treatment with corticosteroids, or the early use of antiviral prophylaxis. Clinical presentation included fever and disturbed liver functions in all patients, one patient had concurrent CMV pneumonitis and one CMV retinitis. Though all patients responded to ganciclovir, two had recurrent disease episodes and one patient died of secondary bacterial sepsis. Late-onset CMV disease can occur several years after OLT. Although it manifests classic clinical features of early disease, it is not associated with traditional risk factors and its pathogenesis may differ from that of early disease.     

Late cytomegalovirus disease following liver transplantation

The widespread use of antiviral prophylaxis or preemptive therapy among orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) recipients has reduced the occurrence of early cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease. Late disease is increasingly reported. Little is known about CMV disease occurring beyond the first year after transplantation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the occurrence of CMV disease two or more years after OLT and to determine its risk factors and clinical features. Eighty-one consecutive OLT recipients followed for 2 years or longer after transplantation were included in the study. Data were collected on demographic and clinical variables, clinical presentation, treatment, and outcome of late CMV disease. Late CMV disease occurred in 7/81 liver recipients (8.5%) at a mean time of 5.9 years after OLT (range: 3.5--9.3, median: 6.3 years). All seven patients were women, with a mean age of 47.7 years (range: 26--60, median: 59 years). There was no association between the development of late CMV disease and the occurrence of rejection episodes, treatment with corticosteroids, or the early use of antiviral prophylaxis. Clinical presentation included fever and disturbed liver functions in all patients, one patient had concurrent CMV pneumonitis and one CMV retinitis. Though all patients responded to ganciclovir, two had recurrent disease episodes and one patient died of secondary bacterial sepsis. Late-onset CMV disease can occur several years after OLT. Although it manifests classic clinical features of early disease, it is not associated with traditional risk factors and its pathogenesis may differ from that of early disease.     

Preemptive treatment for cytomegalovirus viremia to prevent cytomegalovirus disease in solid organ transplant recipients

BACKGROUND: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in solid organ transplant recipients. Preemptive treatment with antiviral agents of patients with CMV viremia has been widely adopted as an alternative to routine prophylaxis to prevent CMV disease. This study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of preemptive treatment in preventing symptomatic CMV disease. METHODS: The Cochrane CENTRAL Registry, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and reference lists were searched for randomized trials of preemptive treatment in solid organ transplant recipients. Two authors extracted all data; analysis was with a random effects model and results expressed as relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: Ten eligible trials (476 patients) were identified, six of preemptive treatment versus placebo or standard care (treatment of CMV when disease occurred), three of preemptive treatment versus antiviral prophylaxis and one of oral versus intravenous preemptive treatment. Compared with placebo or standard care, preemptive treatment significantly reduced the risk of CMV disease (6 trials, 288 patients, RR 0.29, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.80) but not acute rejection (3 trials, 185 patients, RR 1.06, 95% CI 0.64 to 1.76) or all-cause mortality (2 trials, 176 patients, RR 1.23, 95% CI 0.35 to 4.30). Comparative trials of preemptive therapy versus prophylaxis showed no significant difference in the risks of CMV disease (2 trials, 151 patients, RR 0.42, 95% CI 0.07 to 2.65), acute rejection (1 trial, 70 patients, RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.42 to 2.09) or all-cause mortality (3 trials, 151 patients, RR 1.86, 95% CI 0.61 to 5.72). CONCLUSIONS: Few randomized trials have evaluated the effects of preemptive therapy to prevent CMV disease. Preemptive therapy is effective compared with placebo or standard care, but additional head-to-head trials are required to determine the relative benefits and harms of preemptive therapy and prophylaxis to prevent CMV disease in solid organ transplant recipients.     

Prophylaxis versus preemptive therapy for cytomegalovirus disease in high-risk liver transplant recipients

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is an opportunistic infection frequently found after solid organ transplantation, and it contributes significantly to mortality and morbidity. CMV-seronegative recipients of grafts from CMV-seropositive donors have the highest risk of CMV disease. The most appropriate strategy for preventing CMV disease in this population is a matter of active debate. In this study, we compared prophylaxis and preemptive therapy for the prevention of CMV disease in donor-seropositive/recipient-seronegative (D(+) /R(-) ) liver recipients. To this end, we selected a retrospective cohort of liver recipients (1992-2009) for analysis. D(+) /R(-) patients were identified from the liver transplant program database. Eighty of 878 consecutive liver recipients (9%) were D(+) /R(-) . Six of these patients died within 30 days of transplantation and were excluded. Thirty-five of the remaining D(+) /R(-) patients (47%) received prophylaxis, and 39 patients (53%) followed a preemptive strategy based on CMV antigenemia surveillance. Fifty-four (73%) were men, the median age was 49 years (range = 15-68 years), and the mean follow-up was 68 months (range = 8-214 months). The baseline characteristics and the initial immunosuppressive regimens were similar for the 2 groups. Ganciclovir or valganciclovir was the antiviral drug used initially in both strategy groups. CMV disease occurred more frequently among D(+) /R(-) liver recipients receiving preemptive therapy (33.3% versus 8.6% for the prophylaxis group, P = 0.01), whereas late-onset CMV disease was found only in patients receiving prophylaxis (5.7% versus 0% for the preemptive therapy group, P = 0.22). No significant differences in acute allograft rejection, other opportunistic infections, or case fatality rates were observed. According to our data, prophylaxis was more effective than preemptive therapy in preventing CMV disease in high-risk liver transplant recipients. Liver Transpl, 2012. ? 2012 AASLD.     

Mycophenolate Mofetil Can Be Used as Monotherapy Late After Liver Transplantation

We report our experience with calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) withdrawal and MMF monotherapy in 50 adult liver transplant (OLT) recipients with CNI-related toxicity. Thirty-four patients had chronic renal dysfunction (CRD) associated with arterial hypertension, 11 had only CRD and other five patients had hypertension. The mean time between OLT and introduction of MMF was 81 months. After the introduction of MMF, CNI was progressively reduced and withdrawn if possible. At the end of the follow up (mean time: 18 months) CNI was withdrawn in 39 patients (78%), and there was a significant decrease from baseline in serum creatinine (1.81-1.49 mg/dL; p < 0.0001), BUN (76.6-52.8 mg/dL; p < 0.0001) and uric acid (9-7.5 mg/dL; p < 0.0001) levels, and an increase in creatinine clearance (44.7-55.1 mL/min; p < 0.0001). Excluding patients who developed graft rejection and two patients who died, CRD improved in 32 of 40 patients (80%), and arterial hypertension improved in 22 of 29 patients (76%). Five patients (10%) developed acute rejection, and one patient (2%) chronic rejection. Twenty-six patients (52%) experienced side-effects, with asthenia, herpes virus infection, and diarrhea being the most common. Only eight patients (16%) required MMF dose reduction. In conclusion, MMF monotherapy late after OLT improves CRD and hypertension in most patients, is safe and well tolerated.     

Cytomegalovirus prevention strategies in seropositive kidney transplant recipients: an insight into current clinical practice

There is notable heterogeneity in the implementation of cytomegalovirus (CMV) prevention practices among CMV‐seropositive (R+) kidney transplant (KT) recipients. In this prospective observational study, we included 387 CMV R+ KT recipients from 25 Spanish centers. Prevention strategies (antiviral prophylaxis or preemptive therapy) were applied according to institutional protocols at each site. The impact on the 12‐month incidence of CMV disease was assessed by Cox regression. Asymptomatic CMV infection, acute rejection, graft function, non‐CMV infection, graft loss, and all‐cause mortality were also analyzed (secondary outcomes). Models were adjusted for a propensity score (PS) analysis for receiving antiviral prophylaxis. Overall, 190 patients (49.1%) received preemptive therapy, 185 (47.8%) antiviral prophylaxis, and 12 (3.1%) no specific intervention. Twelve‐month cumulative incidences of CMV disease and asymptomatic infection were 3.6% and 39.3%, respectively. Patients on prophylaxis had lower incidence of CMV disease [PS‐adjusted HR (aHR): 0.10; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.01–0.79] and asymptomatic infection (aHR: 0.46; 95% CI: 0.29–0.72) than those managed preemptively, with no significant differences according to the duration of prophylaxis. All cases of CMV disease in the prophylaxis group occurred after prophylaxis discontinuation. There were no differences in any of the secondary outcomes. In conclusion, antiviral prophylaxis was associated with a lower occurrence of CMV disease in CMV R+ KT recipients, although such benefit should be balanced with the risk of late‐onset disease.     

Indirect outcomes associated with cytomegalovirus (opportunistic infections, hepatitis C virus sequelae, and mortality) in liver-transplant recipients with the use of preemptive therapy for 13 years

BACKGROUND: The effect of preemptive therapy on indirect sequelae associated with cytomegalovirus (CMV) in liver-transplant recipients has not been clearly delineated. METHODS: Thirteen years of outcome with the use of preemptive therapy were assessed in a cohort of 216 consecutive liver-transplant recipients. RESULTS: The incidence of major infections (31% vs. 44.3%), bacterial infections (31% vs. 39.2%), bacteremia (19% vs. 29.1%), or fungal infections (3.4% vs. 7.6%) did not differ significantly for patients with CMV infection who received preemptive therapy compared with those who never developed CMV infection and did not receive antiviral prophylaxis for CMV (P>0.20 for all variables). The rate of opportunistic infections also did not differ when patients were stratified by primary CMV infection, reactivation infection, or no CMV infection. Recurrent hepatitis C virus (HCV) hepatitis occurred in 55.6% of the patients with CMV treated with preemptive therapy and 49.8% of those without CMV infection (P>0.20). The probability of survival at 6 months, 12 months, 2 years, and 3 years was also comparable for the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Liver-transplant recipients with CMV infection, including high-risk R-/D+ patients, when followed using the preemptive therapy approach had no significant difference in meaningful outcomes such as opportunistic superinfections, HCV recurrence rates, rejection, and survival when compared with the patients in whom CMV infection never developed and who did not receive antiviral prophylaxis for CMV.     

Steroid-free induction and preemptive antiviral therapy for liver transplant recipients with hepatitis C: a preliminary report from a prospective randomized study

Recurrence of hepatitis C (HepC) has been a most difficult dilemma in liver transplantation (OLT) because the effects of immunosuppression with steroid, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) calcineurin antagonists, and anti-interleukin-2 antibody as well as the role of preemptive antiviral therapy are uncertain. In this study, we randomized OLT recipients with HepC into two treatment arms: tacrolimus+daclizumab+MMF (study arm) versus tacrolimus+steroids+MMF (control arm). The study arm only received steroids for the treatment of biopsy-proven rejection episodes. Both arms received preemptive anti-viral therapy with Pegasys and ribavirin. The 39 enrolled patients (among 50 to be enrolled) have median follow-up of 458 days with 23 patients (8 in study arm, 15 in control arm) having reached 1 year. The incidences of rejection episodes within 0 to 3 months, 3 to 6 months, and 6 to 12 months were (study vs control): 0% vs 28%; 0% vs 6%; and 13% vs 20%; respectively (P = NS). The 1-year protocol biopsies showed advanced fibrosis (stage 3 or greater) in 20% (3 of 15) of the control arm, but none (0 of 7) of the study arm (P = NS). We compared anticipated side effects of steroids in the first 3 months (study vs control): hypertension (36% vs 58%, P = NS), PTDM (7% vs 43%, P = .02), and wound infections (14% vs 37%, P = NS). In conclusion, liver transplant recipients with HepC tolerate a steroid-free protocol. There was a trend toward reduced steroid side effects and a lower incidence of advanced fibrosis in 1-year biopsy samples among patients receiving the steroid-free protocol.     

The Impact of Everolimus on Renal Function in Maintenance Liver Transplantation

We retrospectively investigated the impact on renal function (RF) of conversion from calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) to everolimus (EVL) monotherapy in orthotopic liver transplant (OLT) recipients. Between January 2006 and July 2007, 70 deceased donor OLT recipients including 51 men and 19 women of overall mean age of 55.9 ± 11 years were enrolled into a program of conversion to EVL monotherapy at a mean interval of 45 ± 35.9 months from transplantation (range, 7-192 months). The indication for conversion was deteriorating RF in 64 (91.4%). Efficacy failure was defined as the persistence of CNI, EVL discontinuation, death, graft loss, loss to follow-up, or need for dialysis at 12 months. Twelve months after switching, 53 patients (75.7%) were on EVL monotherapy. Their mean change in creatinine clearance (CrCl) from baseline (day 1 before EVL introduction) to endpoint (12 months) was 5.8 ± 13.1 mL/min. On univariate and multivariate analyses, the clinical variable correlated with the greatest probability of improvement was the baseline CrCl (P < .0001). Conversion from CNI to EVL monotherapy was successful in 75.7% of cases with improvement in RF correlated with baseline CrCl. These data supported preemptive minimization of CNI in the posttransplant course, seeking to delay the decline in RF.     

Applicability, Tolerability and Efficacy of Preemptive Antiviral Therapy in Hepatitis C-Infected Patients Undergoing Liver Transplantation

Preliminary studies suggest preemptive anti-HCV therapy in liver transplant recipients may enhance the rates of viral clearance, but the applicability and tolerability of preemptive therapy has not been evaluated in a contemporary cohort. In this randomized study, the safety and tolerability of preemptive standard (IFN) or pegylated (peg-IFN) interferon alfa-2b (3 MU thrice weekly or 1.5 microg/kg weekly), or IFN/peg-IFN plus ribavirin (600 mg increased to 1.0-1.2 g daily) was initiated 2-6 weeks post-transplantation and continued for a total of 48 weeks. Only 51 (41%) of 124 transplant recipients were eligible for preemptive treatment; eligible patients had lower model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) and Childs-Pugh scores pre-transplantation and were more frequently live donor transplant recipients than ineligible patients. Dose reductions and discontinuations were required in 85% and 37% of patients, respectively, and 27% experienced serious adverse events. Growth factor (GF) use (erythropoietin and GCSF) in the latter half of the study did not significantly affect the frequency of dose reductions. Only 15% of patients were able to achieve full-dose treatment during treatment. End-of-treatment and sustained virological responses were 13.6% and 9.1%, respectively, with most responders in the combination therapy group. We conclude that preemptive antiviral therapy is applicable to only a portion of transplant recipients, with 'sicker' patients less likely to be managed by this approach. Living donor liver transplant recipients were more frequently eligible for treatment than deceased donor recipients. Virological response rates are low, likely related to the poor tolerability of therapy and the lack of achievement of target drug doses. Future studies should focus on alternative dosing schedules with more aggressive use of adjuvant therapies, including GFs.     

Clinical Outcomes of Pneumocystis carinii Pneumonia in Adult Liver Transplant Recipients

Purpose

Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia (PCP) is an opportunistic infection associated with morbidity and mortality in solid-organ transplant recipients. We retrospectively assessed the characteristics and outcomes of liver transplant (OLT) recipients with PCP compared with those of patients with severe non-P carinii pneumonia (non-PCP) who required intensive care with mechanical ventilation.

Methods

During the 2-year period between January 2008 and December 2009, 43 adult OLT recipients had severe pneumonia requiring mechanical ventilation; of these, 8 (19%) had PCP. During this period, routine antibiotic prophylaxis was administered for the first 6 months after OLT.

Results

The median period from OLT to development of PCP was 9.5 months (range, 1–67); the 1-year incidence was 0.9%. The 6 and 6 to 12-month incidences of non-PCP were 4.2% and 0.3%, respectively, and those of PCP were 0.3% and 0.6%, respectively. Four of 8 patients (50%) in the PCP group had a recent history of a rejection episode. PCP was associated with a higher incidence of prior antirejection treatment. There were no significant differences between PCP and non-PCP groups in age, gender, preoperative Model for End-stage Liver Disease score, primary diagnosis, graft type, and total number of rejection episodes.

Conclusions

These results indicate that the risk of PCP in OLT recipients is closely related to strong immunosuppressive treatment for acute cellular rejection episodes, suggesting the importance of PCP prophylaxis in these patients. Because most patients developed PCP at around 1 year, it may be advisable to prolong routine post-OLT PCP prophylaxis for 12 months, especially among patients receiving antirejection treatment.     

Peginterferon and ribavirin in patients with HCV cirrhosis after liver transplantation

The objective of the study was to assess the efficacy of antiviral therapy in patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) recurrence after liver transplantation (OLT). We included 30 patients of mean age 56 years, who experienced HCV recurrence after OLT. Mean time from OLT to the beginning of therapy was 57 months (median: 43 months). All of them were on monotherapy: tacrolimus (n = 21), cyclosporine (n = 6), and mycophenolate mofetil (n = 3). Fourteen had previously been diagnosed with allograft HCV cirrhosis. Patients were treated with peginterferon alpha 2b (1.5 mug/kg/weekly SC) and ribavirin (10.6 mg/kg/d) for 48 (genotypes 1, 4) or 24 weeks (genotypes 2, 3). After a mean follow-up of 20 months, two patients had died due to biliary sepsis (while on therapy) and acute myocardial infarction (7 months after the end of therapy). End of treatment virological response was achieved in 19 patients (63.3%) and sustained virological response (SUR) in 14 (46.7%). Comparing cirrhotic and noncirrhotic patients, SVR was achieved in seven patients in both groups (50% vs 43.8%; P = .732). Every patient had some adverse event; in 11 patients (36.7%) it was withdrawn (seven cirrhotic and four noncirrhotic; P < .05), and in 12 the starting dose was decreased (40%). There were neither rejection episodes nor cirrhotic complications during therapy, but infections were more common in cirrhotic patients (57% vs 25%; P < .05). In HCV cirrhotic transplanted patients the sustained virological response to combined antiviral therapy was similar to that in noncirrhotic patients, but severe adverse events including infections were much more common.     

Introduction of Mycophenolate Mofetil in Maintenance Liver Transplant Recipients: What Can We Expect? Results of a 10-Year Experience

Background

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is a cornerstone immunosuppressive drug after liver transplantation (OLT). The aim of this study was to evaluate the long term results of the addition of MMF in maintenance OLT recipients.

Methods

From 1996 to 2006, MMF was introduced because of (1) histologic features of rejection or (2) calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) toxicity in order to reduce CNI dosage.

Results

The study population included 208 patients (median, age 54 ± 9 years), with a median delay between OLT and MMF introduction of 54 ± 43 months. The median dosage of MMF was 1180 mg/d at the end of follow-up. After a median follow-up of 50 ± 26 months, 26.4% of the patients taking MMF did present ≥1 side effect and MMF discontinuation rate was 13.8% (transient in 3.8%). The main side effects were digestive disorders (45%), pruritus ± rash ± mucitis (12.7%), and myelosuppression (16.4%). MMF was withdrawn because of digestive disorders (17.2%), pruritus ± rash ± mucitis (17.2%), and myelosuppression (24.1%). The mean glomerular filtration rate as calculated by the Cockcroft-Gault formula value significantly increased after the introduction of MMF (58.1 vs 71.4 mL/min; paired t-test; P < .01). Improvement of renal function was significantly associated with initial association with tacrolimus (vs cyclosporine), initial trough level of cyclosporine (not tacrolimus), delay between OLT and MMF introduction, and age of renal impairment.

Conclusion

Our results suggest that the introduction of MMF in OLT maintenance recipients is efficient and well-tolerated (one quarter of the patients presented significant side effects, leading to treatment discontinuation in 10% of the patients).     

Immunosuppression With Low-Dose Daclizumab in Liver Transplant Recipients With Impaired Kidney Function: A Single-Center Experience

Background

Nephrotoxicity of calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) may exert detrimental effects, particularly in orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) patients with impaired kidney function. Immunosuppression with daclizumab permits delayed introduction of CNI, and may be preferred for patients with kidney dysfunction. This retrospective analysis of our experience using daclizumab was performed among patients who underwent transplantation with impaired kidney function.

Methods

We analyzed 168 patients. A serum creatinine (Cr) level >1.5 mg/dL was the indication for a protocol with low-dose daclizumab (50 mg intravenous [IV], day 0 and day 4), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF; 500 mg twice daily IV/orally), and tapering doses of prednisolone from day 0 after OLT. CNI were introduced at day 4-15 after OLT. Patients with a Cr level <1.5 mg/dL received immunosuppression with CNI+MMF+steroids or CNI+steroids.

Results

Fourteen patients fulfilled the criterion for daclizumab immunosupression. Their Cr and creatinine clearance (CrCl) values at OLT were 2.85 ± 1.22 mg/dL and 19 ± 11 mL/min, respectively. In the remaining 154 patients, Cr and CrCl results were 0.88 ± 0.3 mg/dL and 107 ± 82 mL/min, respectively. At discharge, the daclizumab group showed Cr and CrCl estimates of 0.97 ± 0.45 mg/dL and 86 ± 34 mL/min (P < .0001 for both, when compared with prior to OLT). Both Cr and CrCl levels at discharge were not different from those values of patients who underwent transplantation with normal kidney function. The incidence of acuterejection was 14% in the daclizumab group and 18% in the other recipients (P = not significant [NS]).

Conclusions

Immunosuppression with low-dose daclizumab and delayed introduction of CNI was safe and did not increase the risk of an acute rejection episode, thus offerring an excellent therapeutic option for patients who undergo transplantation with impaired kidney function.     

Preventive Strategies Against Cytomegalovirus and Incidence of α‐Herpesvirus Infections in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients: A Nationwide Cohort Study

We assessed the impact of antiviral preventive strategies on the incidence of herpes simplex virus (HSV) and varicella‐zoster virus (VZV) infections in a nationwide cohort of transplant recipients. Risk factors for the development of HSV or VZV infection were assessed by Cox proportional hazards regression. We included 2781 patients (56% kidney, 20% liver, 10% lung, 7.3% heart, 6.7% others). Overall, 1264 (45%) patients received antiviral prophylaxis (ganciclovir or valganciclovir, n = 1145; acyclovir or valacyclovir, n = 138). Incidence of HSV and VZV infections was 28.9 and 12.1 cases, respectively, per 1000 person‐years. Incidence of HSV and VZV infections at 1 year after transplant was 4.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] 3.5–5.8) in patients receiving antiviral prophylaxis versus 12.3% (95% CI 10.7–14) in patients without prophylaxis; this was observed particularly for HSV infections (3% [95% CI 2.2–4] versus 9.8% [95% CI 8.4–11.4], respectively). A lower rate of HSV and VZV infections was also seen in donor or recipient cytomegalovirus‐positive patients receiving ganciclovir or valganciclovir prophylaxis compared with a preemptive approach. Female sex (hazard ratio [HR] 1.663, p = 0.001), HSV seropositivity (HR 5.198, p < 0.001), previous episodes of rejection (HR 1.95, p = 0.004), and use of a preemptive approach (HR 2.841, p = 0.017) were significantly associated with a higher risk of HSV infection. Although HSV and VZV infections were common after transplantation, antiviral prophylaxis significantly reduced symptomatic HSV infections.     

Efficacy and limitations of preemptive therapy against cytomegalovirus infections in heart transplant patients

OBJECTIVES: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease often represents a serious complication that promotes opportunistic infections in heart transplant recipients. In this study we evaluated the impact of preemptive gancylovir therapy, guided by pp65 antigenemia on the morbidity associated with viral reactivation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We have performed a CMV infection surveillance program since March 1999, with antigenemia pp65 determinations weekly for the first 2 months biweekly in the third months, and monthly to the sixth month. Patients with pp65 antigenemia value >/= 10 positive cells per 2 x 10(5) polymorphonuclear cells (PMN) were treated with intravenous gancyclovir followed by 1 month of oral gancyclovir. RESULTS: Among the 107 patients who underwent the virological monitoring, 80 were pp65 antigenemia-positive with preemptive therapy administered in 48 cases. Five patients displayed symptomatic CMV disease (4.7% vs 18% rate in the period of 1988 to 1998 before the introduction of virologic monitoring; P <.01). We observed only one case of gancyclovir-resistant pneumonia which was successfully treated with foscarnet. CMV recurrence in 10 patients required a second cycle of gancyclovir treatment. Our experience included 13 opportunistic infections (12.7%) with 11 antigenemia-positive. CONCLUSIONS: Preemptive therapy drastically reduces the incidence of CMV disease and the associated morbidity. Compared to universal prophylaxis, this approach may avoid unnecessary pharmacologic treatment in more than 50% of transplant recipients. Indeed, preemptive therapy does not fully prevent CMV disease, because it may manifest at the first antigenemia determination, and furthermore may select gancyclovir-resistant strains.     

The use of extracorporeal photopheresis for allograft rejection in liver transplant recipients

BACKGROUND: Originally introduced for cutaneous T-cell lymphomas and autoimmune diseases, extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) has been proven effective to reverse allograft rejection. The aim of the present work was to show the results of a single-center experience with ECP for the treatment of biopsy-proven rejection in selected liver transplant (LT) recipients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of five LT patients (M:F=4:1; median age 51 years) undergoing ECP for biopsy-proven allograft rejection between January 1996 and December 2003. In this period 476 LT were performed on 441 patients. RESULTS: The indications for LT were three cases of HCV-related cirrhosis, complicated by hepatocellular carcinoma in two; one HBV-HDV-alcoholic cirrhosis; and one fulminant HBV hepatitis. All patients received calcineurin-inhibitor (CNI)-based immunosuppression with induction using anti-IL2R monoclonal antibodies. Indications for ECP were: ductopenic rejection in one patient with HCV recurrence; steroid-resistant acute rejection in two; acute rejection in a major ABO-mismatched liver graft; and one acute rejection in a patient with a proven allergy to steroids. The median interval from LT to inception of ECP was 43 days. The median number of ECP sessions per patient was 20. During the course of ECP, two patients tested positive for CMV antigenemia, associated in one case with bacterial pneumonia. All patients tolerated ECP and there were no procedure-related complications. At a median follow-up of 7.9 months after start of ECP, neither rejection relapses nor HCV/HBV recurrences have been observed. Three patients are off ECP with complete reversal and low-dose immunosuppression. Two patients are still receiving ECP with full-dose immunosuppression: one has achieved normal liver function but ECP is indicated due to a major ABO-incompatible liver graft, while the other patient's liver functions have not yet returned to baseline values.     

MMF and Calcineurin Taper in Recurrent Hepatitis C After Liver Transplantation: Impact on Histological Course

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) recurrence after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) is almost universal. The optimal immunosuppression for these patients is still under discussion. We designed a retrospective case-control study to evaluate the effect of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) treatment in patients with recurrent hepatitis C. Forty patients with histologically proven hepatitis C recurrence after OLT were treated with MMF and calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) taper for 24 months and matched with 40 non-MMF-treated positive liver transplant recipients. Liver biopsies were obtained prior to MMF treatment and after a mean follow-up of 24 months. Histological changes were evaluated utilizing the Metavir score. Comparison of fibrosis/inflammation showed no impairment of histological findings during MMF treatment. In contrast, histological findings of the 40 non-MMF patients showed a significant increase of severity for inflammation/fibrosis. Viral load was similar in both groups. The course of alanin amino transferase (ALT) levels measured during MMF treatment showed a significant decrease. MMF in combination with CNI taper showed a positive effect on fibrosis progression, graft inflammation and ALT levels and may improve the clinical course of HCV after OLT, however, the antiviral properties of MMF are still unconfirmed.     

Pegylated interferon-α-based treatment for chronic hepatitis C in renal transplant recipients: an open pilot study

Treatment of hepatitis C in renal transplant recipients remains a controversial issue, as interferon therapy has been associated with a high risk of rejection and poor efficacy. We report here the use of pegylated interferon-α, alone or in combination with ribavirin, in renal transplant recipients with chronic hepatitis C. Eight renal transplant recipients with chronic hepatitis C were recruited. The mean delay between renal transplantation and antiviral therapy was 198.8 months. Sustained virological response was observed in four of out eight patients. Three patients with sustained virological response were genotype 2, one was genotype 1; fibrosis stages were F1 for one patient, F2 for 2, F3 for one. At baseline, renal dysfunction was moderate in seven patients and severe in one patient. No patient experienced rejection episodes during or after pegylated interferon-α therapy. One patient developed haemolytic uraemic syndrome, which eventually resulted in graft loss and return to dialysis. In conclusion, for renal transplant recipients treated with pegylated interferon-α-based therapy, we observed a low risk of renal dysfunction, acceptable tolerance and significant virological efficacy. This is therefore the first study to suggest that pegylated interferon-α could be proposed late after transplantation to renal transplant recipients.     

Indications and Management of Everolimus After Liver Transplantation

Objective

Our aim was to assess our experience with the use and management of everolimus after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT).

Materials and Methods

Among the 759 patients who underwent transplantation from 1988 to 2008, 25 (3.2%) received immunosuppression with everolimus. Their mean age was 55.6 years. We analyzed indications for use, time between transplantation and introduction of everolimus, as well as its efficacy, side effects, and patient survival.

Results

The indications for everolimus treatment were: extended hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in the explanted liver (n = 6; 24%); HCC recurrence during follow-up (n = 4; 16%); de novo tumor (n = 6; 24%); refractory rejection (n = 3; 12%); side effects of calcineurin inhibitors (CNI; n = 3; 12%); and other causes (n = 3; 12%). Mean time between OLT and everolimus treatment was 40 ± 33 months (range, 10 days-178 months). Mean follow-up after conversion was 10 ± 9 months (range, 1.5-25 months). More than half of the patients resolved the event for which the drug was indicated: 75% of patients with refractory rejection; 60% of those with renal insufficiency; and 100% of those converted for neurotoxicity or hepatotoxicity. Two patients with recurrent HCC and 1 with extended HCC died at a mean time of 10.5 months. The 6 cases of de novo tumors were operated and are healthy. Side effects were dyslipidemia in 8 and infection in 2. Five patients (20%) discontinued the drug.

Conclusions

In the early posttransplantation period, everolimus is indicated for refractory rejection or as prophylaxis for recurrence of extended tumors. In any time but especially in the late period, everolimus is indicated for patients with serious side effects due to a CNI or to a de novo tumor.