Osteoid osteoma mimicking chronic arthritis. Diagnosis by bone scintigraphy

The case of a patient with osteoid osteoma of the heel is presented. The patient was misdiagnosed and treated for four years as having arthritis. Osteoid osteoma was diagnosed by 99mTc-MDP bone scan that was performed for the evaluation of the arthritis. Plain radiography and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were negative for signs of arthritis. However, MRI when reevaluated after positive bone scintigraphy, was found positive for osteoid osteoma. This case underscores the value of bone scintigraphy for the diagnosis of osteoid osteoma.     

Osteoid osteoma of the petrous bone

We present a case of osteoid osteoma of the petrous bone presenting with progressive sensorineural hearing loss. CT showed a dense homogeneous mass at the promontory surrounded by a thin bony border. On MRI this lesion gave intermediate signal intensity on T1- and T2-weighted spin-echo images and enhanced intensely with gadolinium. Surgical removal and pathological study proved the diagnosis. Received: 13 February 1997 Accepted: 21 February 1997     

Osteoid osteoma in cancellous bone.

Osteoid osteoma in cancellous bone lacks the usual osteoblastic reaction that accompanies the classical cortical or juxtacortical osteoid osteoma. Familiarity with this type of presentation should instigate the appropriate diagnostic steps, including nuclear medicine studies using pin-hole collimation, and thin tomographic cuts.     

Osteoid osteoma simulating osteomyelitis: Differentiation with Tc-99m HIG scintigraphy

We present a case of osteoid osteoma with a history of mild pain, local swelling and point tenderness on the right lower leg. The diagnosis of osteoid osteoma was difficult due to the atypical clinical history and misleading radiological and bone scan findings. When it is difficult to differentiate an osteoid osteoma from osteomyelitis using CT, MRI or bone scan; HIG scintigraphy can be used to exclude an infection.     

Osteoid osteoma: radionuclide diagnosis

The double-density sign, seen on radionuclide bone scans, is described for diagnosing osteoid osteomas and for localizing the nidus. Its use in differentiating the nidus of an osteoid osteoma from osteomyelitis is also described. The utility of computed tomography in localization of the nidus is also illustrated. The double-density sign was helpful in diagnosing seven cases of surgically confirmed osteoid osteoma.     

Osteoid osteoma: CT-guided percutaneous treatment

Seven patients with presumed osteoid osteoma were treated with percutaneous destruction or drill resection with computed tomographic (CT) guidance. The diagnosis of osteoid osteoma was made on the basis of findings in the clinical history and results at plain radiography, bone scintigraphy, and CT. In four patients, histologic confirmation was obtained. Hospital stay lasted from 1 to 3 days. After 11-38 months of follow-up examinations, all patients were asymptomatic. The authors report this simple procedure as an alternative to the more traditional open surgery technique.     

Osteoid osteoma: the difficult diagnosis

The diagnosis of osteoid osteoma can be difficult. We present eight children where the diagnosis of osteoid osteoma was difficult, due to a clinical history suggesting an alternative diagnosis, misleading radiological findings, or where the osteoid osteoma was in an unusual site. In some cases, diagnosis was only reached after biopsy, despite radiological investigation and radioisotope studies. The diagnosis should be considered in a child with bony pain or bony swelling, especially where the history is a chronic one. We present a radiological algorithm for the investigation of patients suspected of having an osteoid osteoma.     

Osteoid osteoma: MR imaging revisited

To assess and compare with computed tomography (CT) the performance of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in the detection of osteoid osteoma, and determine the features of this lesion on MR imaging. The prospective MR imaging and CT diagnosis of osteoid osteoma was determined from original radiology reports. MR images were assessed retrospectively with regard to the location and signal intensity of the nidus and surrounding bone marrow and soft tissue edema. These findings were correlated with the age of the patient, duration of symptoms, and drug therapy. Ten patients with histologically proven osteoid osteoma who underwent MR imaging were reviewed. All 10 lesions were correctly diagnosed at the time of MR imaging. None of the lesions was intracortical. Nine lesions were intra-articular. Two out of five patients with extracortical lesions had false negative CT preceding the MR study. Signal intensity of the nidus, marrow, and soft tissue edema on MR imaging were variable. Perinidal edema was most pronounced in younger patients and had no apparent relation to drug therapy. MR imaging reliably demonstrates the nidus of an osteoid osteoma, which has a variable appearance related to its position relative to the cortex of the bone. A predominance of cancellous osteoid osteomas are encountered in patients referred for MR imaging. Marrow edema in the vicinity of the lesion improves the conspicuity of the nidus. CT may fail to diagnose osteoid osteoma when the nidus is in a cancellous location, due to the lack of perinidal density alteration.     

Osteoid osteoma of the elbow

Six cases of osteoid osteoma of the elbow were reviewed to determine the spectrum of clinical, pathologic and radiologic findings. Since osteoid osteoma of the elbow may masquerade as a nonspecific synovitis, the diagnosis is challenging and frequently delayed. The histology is, however, indistinguishable from that of osteoid osteoma occurring in typical locations. The radiologic features of osteoid osteoma of the elbow include the following triad: (a) osteosclerosis, usually a dominant feature at initial imaging and typically enveloping the nidus; (b) joint effusion; and (c) periosteal reaction that can involve both the bone in which the osteoid osteoma arises and adjacent bones. Awareness of these features will facilitate correct diagnosis, thereby facilitating timely and appropriate treatment.The opinions and assertions contained herein are the private views of the authors and are not to be construed as official or as reflecting the views of the Department of the Army, the Department of Defense or the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences     

Osteoid osteoma of the spine

High resolution CT has become crucial to the definite diagnosis, accurate localisation and extension of benign spinal tumors. An osteoid osteoma mostly suspected by X-ray or scintigraphy, located in the axial skeleton--mainly of spongious content and with a complex anatomical structure--will be definitely more distinctly visualized on CT. Post-operative evaluation also requires CT.     

Osteoid osteoma: excision with scintimetric guidance

The definite diagnosis of osteoid osteoma relies on the demonstration of the nidus, best shown by CT, which also provides precise preoperative localization of the nidus. While bone-block excision to remove the nidus is feasible in the long bones, there may be unacceptable sequelae in the vertebral column and small bones of the hands. By precisely localizing the nidus, radionuclide scintimetry permits excellent therapeutic results, with minimal morbidity.     

Osteoid osteoma: radiologic and pathologic correlation

Sixty-seven cases of osteoid osteoma were studied at the Hospital for Joint Diseases between 1980 and 1989. The lesions were categorized according to location: medullary, cortical, or subperiosteal and were further grouped as intracapsular and extracapsular. The histologic features of trabecular thickness, reactive bone formation, proportion of fibrovascular stroma, and ratio of osteoid and mineralized matrix were examined. The radiographic features were compared. The literature is reviewed. We include our experience with tetracycline labelling.     

Osteoid osteoma: clinical results with thermocoagulation

PURPOSE: To determine the clinical results in an unselected group of consecutive patients with osteoid osteoma treated with thermocoagulation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 97 consecutive patients with clinical and/or radiologic evidence of osteoid osteoma at any location, the clinical symptoms were assessed before and after thermocoagulation with computed tomographic guidance. A good response was defined as disappearance of symptoms that were manifested at presentation and attributed to osteoid osteoma. Clinical assessment was performed prior to discharge; within 2 weeks after the procedure; and at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months follow-up. After 24 months, a postal questionnaire was used for assessment. RESULTS: The mean clinical follow-up after the only or the last thermocoagulation session was 41 months (range, 5-81 months). Response was good after one session of thermocoagulation in 74 (76%) of 97 patients, and the 95% CI was 68% to 85%. Patients with persistent symptoms did well after repeated thermocoagulation (good response in 10 of 12 patients), but results of repeated thermocoagulation were poor in patients with recurrent symptoms (good response in five of 10). The overall success rate after one or two thermocoagulation procedures combined was 92% (89 of 97 patients), and the 95% CI was 86% to 97%. Complications were observed in two patients. CONCLUSION: Percutaneous thermocoagulation is a safe and effective method for treatment of osteoid osteoma at any location. Repeated thermocoagulation is successful in patients with persistent symptoms.