Blood collection and transfusion in the United States in 2001

BACKGROUND: Collection, processing, and transfusion of blood and blood components in the United States in 2001 were measured and compared with prior years. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The survey was completed by 1443 blood centers and hospitals. Statistical procedures were used to verify the representativeness of the sample and to estimate national totals. RESULTS: The total US blood supply in 2001 was 15,320,000 units (before testing), 10.4 percent greater than in 1999. It included 14,259,000 allogeneic units, 619,000 autologous units, and 273,000 red cell (RBC) units collected by apheresis. Transfusion of whole blood (WB) and RBCs increased by 12.2 percent to 13,898,000 units. Platelet (PLT) transfusions totaled 10,196,000 units, an increase of 12.6 percent in comparison with 1999. The use of single-donor apheresis PLTs increased by 26.0 percent to 7,582,000 PLT concentrate equivalent units. The use of PLTs from WB (PLT concentrates) continued a downtrend, declining 13.9 percent to 2,614,000. CONCLUSIONS: The margin between transfusion demand and the total allogeneic supply in 2001 was 1,162,000 units, 7.9 percent of supply. By comparison, the 1999 margin was 9.1 percent. The rate of blood collection per 1,000 donor-eligible population in 2001 was 8.9 percent higher than in 1999, due largely to additional donations following the September terrorist attacks. During the same period, however, the rate of transfusion per 1,000 total US population increased by 9.9 percent to 50.0 units, the highest in 15 years of measurement. The steady increase in demand continues to challenge the US blood community.     

The American Red Cross donor hemovigilance program: complications of blood donation reported in 2006

BACKGROUND: The American Red Cross (ARC) initiated a comprehensive donor hemovigilance program in 2003. We provide an overview of reported complications after whole blood (WB), apheresis platelet (PLT), or automated red cell (R2) donation and analyze factors contributing to the variability in reported complication rates in our national program. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Complications recorded at the collection site or reported after allogeneic WB, apheresis PLT, and R2 donation procedures in 36 regional blood centers in 2006 were analyzed by univariate and multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: Complications after 6,014,472 WB, 449,594 PLT, and 228,183 R2 procedures totaled 209,815, 25,966, and 12,282 (348.9, 577.5, and 538.3 per 10,000 donations), respectively, the vast majority of which were minor presyncopal reactions and small hematomas. Regional center, donor age, sex, and donation status were independently associated with complication rates after WB, PLT, and R2 donation. Seasonal variability in complications rates after WB and R2 donation correlated with the proportion of donors under 20 years old. Excluding large hematomas, the overall rate of major complications was 7.4, 5.2, and 3.3 per 10,000 collections for WB, PLT, and R2 procedures, respectively. Outside medical care was recorded at similar rates for both WB and automated collections (3.2 vs. 2.9 per 10,000 donations, respectively). CONCLUSION: The ARC data describe the current risks of blood donation in a model multicenter hemovigilance system using standardized definitions and reporting protocols. Reported reaction rates varied by regional center independently of donor demographics, limiting direct comparison of different regional blood centers.     

Frequent plateletpheresis does not clinically significantly decrease platelet counts in donors

BACKGROUND: In October 2005, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued draft guidance on collecting platelets (PLTs) by automated methods. The FDA proposed limiting collections to 24 components, rather than 24 procedures, annually with up to 3 components per procedure. The rationale was from literature suggesting frequent PLT collection resulted in significant declines in donor PLT counts. Additional requirements for minimal interdonation intervals were proposed. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Plateletpheresis records at a regional blood center with predonation PLT counts were used to assess the impact of the restriction on PLT collections. They were reviewed to demonstrate the effects of collection frequency, number of products collected, and interdonation interval on donor PLT counts. Total protein and albumin levels were compared in a subset of 24-times-per-year PLT donors and control whole-blood donors. RESULTS: A limit of 24 components would require replacement of approximately 20 percent of the donor base to recover lost components. No clinically important decrease in PLT counts before donation was seen in donors donating multiple PLT components up to 24 times per year, regardless of interdonation interval. No frequent donor was deferred for a PLT count less than 150 x 10(9) per L. Short interdonation intervals were associated with statistically but not clinically important decreases in PLT counts. Protein levels were not distinguishable between PLT donors and controls. CONCLUSION: The proposed restrictions are not required to prevent thrombocytopenia in frequent PLT donors and would adversely impact the supply of apheresis PLTs. Protein levels are maintained in these high-frequency donors.     

Storage of platelet concentrates from pooled buffy coats made of fresh and overnight-stored whole blood processed on the novel Atreus 2C+ system: in vitro study

BACKGROUND: The Atreus 2C+ system (Gambro BCT) automatically separates whole blood (WB) into buffy coat (BC), red blood cells (RBC), and plasma and transfers the components into separate containers. After processing with the Atreus, 4 to 6 BC units can be pooled and processed into leukoreduced platelets (PLTs) by use of the automated OrbiSac BC system (Gambro BCT). The aim of our in vitro study was to investigate the effects of holding either WB or BC overnight before preparation of PLTs by use of the Atreus 2C+ system for BC preparation. A standard routine procedure involving conventional blood containers for the preparation of BC combined with the OrbiSac process (top-and-top system; Terumo) was used as a reference. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: WB was either processed within 8 hours after collection ("fresh blood") or stored overnight before processing. WB units were separated into BC, RBC, and plasma units and transferred into individual containers. Either the BC or the WB units rested overnight at 22 +/- 2 degrees C. Six ABO-identical BCs, obtained from either fresh or overnight-stored WB, were pooled and processed with the OrbiSac BC system to obtain leukoreduced PLTs. In total, 20 Atreus and 10 reference (leukoreduced PLTs) samples were analyzed for various in vitro variables during the 7-day storage period. RESULTS: No significant difference in glucose consumption, lactate production, mean PLT volume, LDH activity, bicarbonate, ATP, RANTES, and the expression of CD62p and CD42b between groups was detected. pH was maintained at greater than 7.0 (Day 7). Swirling remained at the highest levels (score, 2) for all units throughout storage. CONCLUSION: PLTs derived from BCs, obtained from either fresh or overnight-stored WB processed on the novel automated Atreus 2C+ system, were equivalent to control PLTs with regard to PLT in vitro characteristics during 7 days of storage. Stable recovery of PLTs and satisfactory PLT content according to current standards were also found.     

Blood collection and transfusion in the United States in 1999

BACKGROUND: Collection, processing, and transfusion of blood and blood components in the US in 1999 were measured and compared with prior years. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Questionnaires were completed by 2040 blood centers and hospitals. Statistical procedures were used to verify the representativeness of the sample and to estimate national totals. RESULTS: The total US blood supply in 1999 was 13,876,000 units (before testing), 10.1 percent greater than in 1997. It included 13,109,000 allogeneic units, 651,000 autologous units, and 116,000 red cell (RBC) units collected by apheresis. Transfusion of whole blood and RBCs increased by 7.6 percent to 12,389,000 units. Platelet (PLT) transfusions totaled 9,052,000 PLT concentrate equivalent units, of which 66.5 percent were PLTs from apheresis. In comparison with 1997, the total number of PLT units transfused was unchanged, whereas single-donor PLT units transfused increased by 6.7 percent and the transfusion of PLTs from whole blood (PLT concentrates) declined by 10.6 percent (a difference of approximately 400,000 units in each case). CONCLUSIONS: The margin between transfusion demand and the total allogeneic supply in 1999 was 1,203,000 units, 9.1 percent of the supply. By comparison, the margin in 1997 was 7.2 percent, whereas in 1989 it was 13.8 percent. Similarly, the rate of blood collection in 1999 per 1000 population was 11.9 percent higher than the 1997 rate. During the same period, however, the rate of transfusion per 1000 population increased by 5.8 percent. Risk in the future lies primarily in the increasing demand for RBCs and further shrinkage of the supply-and-demand margin.     

Multicenter evaluation of a whole-blood filter that saves platelets

BACKGROUND: Whole-blood (WB) leukoreduction filters in current use retain the majority of PLTs. A new whole-blood filter, which retains significantly fewer of the PLTs (or saves PLTs [WB-SP]), has been developed. The performance characteristics of the WB-SP filter have been evaluated in a multicenter study. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of 617 units of WB was collected into quadruple bag sets with an integrated WB-SP filter, leukoreduced, and processed into leukoreduced RBCs (LR-RBC), plasma (LR-PL), and buffy coats (LR-BC) from which, pooled, leukoreduced, PLT concentrates (LR-PCs) were produced. Recovery, yield, and residual WBCs were assessed in prepared blood components. RESULTS: The median residual WBC number in the LR-RBCs was 0.05 x 10(6) (range, <0.05-3.8), exceeding 1 x 10(6) in 0.6 percent of the units. Median Hb content in LR-RBC was 50 g (range, 34-72), reflecting a final RBC recovery of 81 +/- 6 percent. The median WBC content of the LR-PC was 0.05 x 10(6) (range, <0.05-0.28), with none exceeding 1 x 10(6). The median PLT content of the LR-PC, per individual donation, was 6.4 x 10(10) (range, 4.1-10.7), representing a final recovery of 62 +/- 10 percent. The mean FVIII activity was 104 +/- 25 percent and 83 +/- 11 percent in plasma separated from fresh or overnight stored WB, respectively. CONCLUSION: Use of the WB-SP filter makes it possible to obtain three leukoreduced blood components with only one filtration step. The WB-SP filter showed good leukoreduction performance and recovery of all blood components including PLTs.     

Bacterial screening of apheresis platelets and the residual risk of septic transfusion reactions: the American Red Cross experience (2004-2006)

BACKGROUND: The American Red Cross initiated systemwide bacterial testing of all apheresis platelet (PLT) collections in March 2004, yet continues to receive reports of septic reactions after transfusion of screened components. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The rates of confirmed bacterial contamination of apheresis PLT collections detected by prospective quality control (QC) testing, and by surveillance of reported septic reactions to screened-negative apheresis PLTs, were analyzed according to the technology utilized for collection. RESULTS: Between March 1, 2004, and May 31, 2006, bacterial culture testing was performed on 1,004,206 donations; of these, 186 (1:5,399) had confirmed-positive culture results. Transfusion of all but 1 of the associated 293 components was prevented. A significantly higher rate of confirmed-positive bacterial cultures was seen with products collected utilizing two-arm collection procedures compared to one-arm procedures (22.7 vs. 11.9 per 10(5) donations; odds ratio [OR], 1.9; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.4-2.7). During this period, 20 septic transfusion reactions were reported, including 3 fatalities (1:498,711 fatalities per distributed component), which implicated screened-negative apheresis PLT products. The frequency of septic reactions was 4.7-fold higher for collections utilizing two-arm procedures (1:41,173; 95% CI, 1:25,000-1:66,667) compared to collections from one-arm procedures (1:193,305; 95% CI, 1:52,632-1:500,000; OR, 4.7; 95% CI, 1.2-18.4); most septic reactions (16 of 20) were due to Staphylococcus spp. and occurred on Day 5 (13 of 20) after collection. CONCLUSION: PLT contamination with bacteria that evade detection by QC culture remains a significant residual transfusion risk, in particular for older PLTs and skin-commensal bacteria in components collected by two-arm apheresis procedures during the study period.     

Pathogen inactivation of platelets with a photochemical treatment with amotosalen HCl and ultraviolet light: process used in the SPRINT trial

BACKGROUND: A photochemical treatment (PCT) system has been developed to inactivate a broad spectrum of pathogens and white blood cells in platelet (PLT) products. The system comprises PLT additive solution (PAS III), amotosalen HCl, a compound adsorption device (CAD), a microprocessor-controlled ultraviolet A light source, and a commercially assembled system of interconnected plastic containers. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A clinical prototype of the PCT system was used in a large, randomized, controlled, double-blind, Phase III clinical trial (SPRINT) that compared the efficacy and safety of PCT apheresis PLTs to untreated apheresis PLTs. The ability of multiple users was assessed in a blood center setting to perform the PCT and meet target process specifications. RESULTS: Each parameter was evaluated for 2237 to 2855 PCT PLT products. PCT requirements with respect to mean PLT dose, volume, and plasma content were met. Transfused PCT PLT products contained a mean of 3.6 x 10(11) +/- 0.7 x 10(11) PLTs. The clinical process, which included trial-specific samples, resulted in a mean PLT loss of 0.8 x 10(11) +/- 0.6 x 10(11) PLTs per product. CAD treatment effectively reduced the amotosalen concentration from a mean of 31.9 +/- 5.3 micromol per L after illumination to a mean of 0.41 +/- 0.56 micromol per L after CAD. In general, there was little variation between sites for any parameter. CONCLUSIONS: The PCT process was successfully implemented by 12 blood centers in the United States to produce PCT PLTs used in a prospective, randomized trial where therapeutic efficacy of PCT PLTs was demonstrated. Process control was achieved under blood bank operating conditions.     

Counting platelets in platelet concentrates on hematology analyzers: a multicenter comparative study

BACKGROUND: Hematology analyzers are designed to count whole blood samples, but are also used by blood centers to perform quality control on blood components. In platelet (PLT) concentrates, the number of PLTs is approximately fivefold higher and red blood cells are absent, causing variable PLT counting results. It was our aim to compare currently used hematology analyzers for counting PLTs in PLT concentrates using fixed human PLTs.
STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: PLT samples were fixed, diluted into seven concentration levels (plus one blank), aliquoted, and shipped to 68 centers. Evaluable data were obtained for 89 hematology analyzers. All samples were counted six times, and results were reported to the coordinating center. The overall group mean was calculated, and the percentage deviation from this mean was calculated for each analyzer.
RESULTS: At PLT levels relevant for blood centers, 750 × 10⁹ to 2000 × 10⁹ per L, analyzers gave results that were between 35 percent lower and 16 percent higher than the overall group mean. Within a group of analyzers, results were comparable with coefficient of variations usually below 10 percent, indicating that the observed differences were caused by instrument characteristics. A smaller study with fresh, unfixed PLT samples showed that analyzers behaved similarly for fixed and fresh PLTs.
CONCLUSION: With a wide array of currently used hematology analyzers, a marked difference was determined for the PLT counts of fixed human-based identical samples provided to 68 laboratories by a centralized facility. A gold standard method is needed to allow for more valid interlaboratory comparisons between hematology analyzers.     

The effect of whole-blood storage time on the number of white cells and platelets in whole blood and in white cell-reduced red cells

BACKGROUND: Whole blood (WB) can be stored for some time before it is processed into components. After introduction of universal white cell (WBC) reduction, it was observed that longer WB storage was associated with more residual WBCs in the WBC-reduced red cells (RBCs). Also, weak propidium iodide (PI)-positive events were observed in the flow cytometric WBC counting method, presumably WBC fragments. The effect of storage time on the composition of WB and subsequently prepared WBC-reduced RBCs was studied. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: WB was collected in bottom-and-top collection systems with inline filters, obtained from Baxter, Fresenius, or MacoPharma. Units were stored at room temperature and separated into components in 4-hour intervals between 4 and 24 hours after collection. RBCs were WBC-reduced by inline filtration (approx. 50/group). RESULTS: Platelet (PLT) counts were lower in WB stored for 4 to 8 hours compared to 20 to 24 hours (mean +/- SD): 79 +/- 31 versus 102 +/- 30 for Baxter (p < 0.01); 91 +/- 31 versus 101 +/- 35 for Fresenius (not significant); and 73 +/- 47 versus 97 +/- 31 (all x 10(9) per unit) for MacoPharma (p < 0.01), respectively. The median residual WBC counts in WBC-reduced RBCs for WB stored for 4 to 8 and 20 to 24 hours were 0.03 versus 0.17 for Baxter (p < 0.001), 0.00 versus 0.06 for Fresenius (p < 0.001), and 0.13 versus 0.26 (all x 10(6) per unit) for MacoPharma (not significant), respectively. All WBC-reduced RBCs contained fewer than 5 x 10(6) WBCs per unit. A longer storage time of WB was associated with more weak PI-positive events, irrespective of the filter. CONCLUSION: Longer storage of WB before processing results in counting higher numbers of PLTs in WB, higher numbers of WBCs in WBC-reduced RBCs, and more weak PI-positive events.     

In vitro and in vivo evaluation of a whole blood platelet‐sparing leukoreduction filtration system

BACKGROUND: In‐line leukoreduction (LR) filters decrease adverse clinical sequelae caused by residual white blood cells (WBCs). Such filtration, however, can remove platelets (PLTs) needed for production of PLT concentrates (PCs). This study measured in vitro and in vivo efficacy of a new whole blood PLT‐sparing LR filter (WBPSF) system that performs whole blood (WB) LR using a single closed‐system filtration step. The WBPSF provides three final LR products: AS‐5 red blood cells (RBCs), citrate‐phosphate‐dextrose (CPD) PLTs, and CPD plasma. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Volunteers (n = 59) donated WB processed using the WBPSF system. WB filtration time was recorded, and LR WB was processed into AS‐5 LR RBCs, CPD LR PLTs, and LR plasma. Final components were assayed for in vitro indices, and in vivo characteristics for LR AS‐5 RBCs and CPD PLTs were assayed after radiolabeling. RESULTS: WB filtration time averaged 37 minutes. Transfusion products obtained after WBPSF met all in vitro and in vivo Food and Drug Administration (FDA) requirements. Radiolabeling of LR AS‐5 RBCs after WBPSF showed a 24‐hour RBC recovery of 81.3 ± 5.3% after 42 days of storage. In vivo dual ¹¹¹In/⁵¹Cr radiolabeling of PCs manufactured using WBPSF showed a Day 5 recovery ratio of 80 ± 19% versus fresh autologous PLTs and a survival ratio of 81 ± 17% that of fresh autologous PLTs. CONCLUSION: All WBPSF‐derived transfusion products met or exceeded in vitro and in vivo FDA guidelines. This filtration system is suitable for routine blood center or hospital use in the production of LR AS‐5 RBCs, CPD PLTs, and CPD plasma.     

Storage of interim platelet units for 18 to 24 hours before pooling: in vitro study

BACKGROUND: The Atreus 3C system (CaridianBCT) automatically produces three components from whole blood (WB), a red blood cell (RBC) unit, a plasma unit, and an interim platelet (PLT) unit (IPU) that can be pooled with other IPUs to form a PLT dose for transfusion. The Atreus 3C system also includes a PLT yield indicator (PYI), which is an advanced algorithm that provides an index that is shown to correlate well with the amount of PLTs that finally end up in the IPU bag. The aim of our in vitro study was to compare the effects of holding WB overnight versus processing WB fresh (2‐8 hr), both with 18‐ to 24‐hour storage of the IPUs before pooling into a transfusable PLT dose. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: WB was processed either fresh (within 8 hr after collection, Atreus F) or after overnight storage (14‐24 hr, Atreus S) without agitation at 22 ± 2°C. After a subsequent resting time of 18 to 24 hours on a flat‐bed shaker, five IPUs were selected for pooling with 200 mL of PAS II for in vitro quality assessments during a 7‐day storage period (n = 10 in each arm). IPUs were selected for pooling using the PYI of the Atreus 3C system. RESULTS: During storage, the glucose concentration was lower (p < 0.05) and the lactate concentration was higher (p < 0.05) in Atreus S pools, but no differences in the glucose consumption rate were noted. Adenosine triphosphate levels and hypotonic shock response reactivity were higher in Atreus S (p < 0.05). No significant differences in PLT counts, contents, mean PLT volume, lactate dehydrogenase, pO₂, pCO₂, extent of shape change, and CD62P between groups were detected. pH was maintained higher than 6.8 (Day 7). With exception of 2 units in the Atreus S arm, swirling remained at greater than 2 in all units at all times. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that PLTs prepared from fresh or overnight‐stored WB and pooled after 18 to 24 hours meet necessary in vitro criteria without any relevant differences between both groups. Using the PYI, comparable yields can be obtained between WB processed within 2 to 8 hours and WB stored overnight.     

Experience of a combined apheresis, blood collection, and blood transfusion unit in a large tertiary care medical center

The Barnes Hospital Apheresis Blood Collection and Blood Transfusion Unit is part of Barns Hospital Blood Bank. Because of its size and complexity, we report our experience which may be useful to administrators and physicians involved in the planning or management of similar services. From 1985 through 1988 we collected platelets from 1,976 different donors, the majority of which (87%) were community donors. Sixty-nine percent of 1,976 donors donated in 1988 an average of 4.9 times. Of 6,568 apheresis products collected. 1.1% were discarded because of positive screening tests and 0.7% were discarded because of outdating or presence of fibrin clot. In 1988 a total of nine cell separators were used. All donor apheresis were done with seven blood separators, and on average a separator produced an apheresis product every 4.5 worked hours. All therapeutic apheresis (338) were done on two separators. Most of them (88%) were performed during work hours. In 1988 donor and therapeutic apheresis were done by 17 1/2 full-time employees (FTEs) during work hours. Considering the Workload Unit Value per procedure given by the College of American Pathologists (CAP) and that each FTE worked 1,864 hours per year, the worked hour productivity for donor and therapeutic apheresis was 78.2%. Blood collections, therapeutic bleeds, and outpatient transfusions (1,127, 114 and 1,745 respectively) were accomplished by two FTEs, for a worked hour productivity of 35.5%. Because 95.1% of total worked units was produced by efficient donor and therapeutic apheresis activities, overall efficiency remained high at 73.8%.     

The safety profile of automated collections: an analysis of more than 1 million collections

BACKGROUND: Recent technology allows for the collection of 2-unit red cells (RBCs) and single-unit RBCs plus plasma or platelets (PLTs). STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: With a common definition of adverse events, 1,023,682 whole-blood collections were evaluated and compared with 249,154 two-unit apheresis RBC collections, 40,870 single-apheresis RBC collections, and 90,082 apheresis PLT collections. RESULTS: The data show that manual whole-blood collections have a low incidence of moderate and severe reactions (47.1 per 10,000 collections, 0.47%). Single-unit RBCs collected by apheresis have the same safety profile (37.44 per 10,000 collections, p > 0.20). Double-RBC collections by apheresis and plateletpheresis have a significantly lower reaction rate (15.65 per 10,000 collections, p < 0.00005; and 14.84 per 10,000 collections, p < 0.00005, respectively). CONCLUSION: It is concluded that automated collections are safe or safer than manual whole-blood collections. There should be few concerns when procedures are performed according to manufacturer's instructions.     

Fatal group C streptococcal infection due to transfusion of a bacterially contaminated pooled platelet unit despite routine bacterial culture screening

BACKGROUND: An elderly man with chronic myelomonocytic leukemia developed respiratory distress and died less than 48 hours after transfusion of a pool of eight whole blood–derived platelets (PLTs). Blood cultures from the recipient and cultures of remnants from the pooled PLT bag grew group C streptococci (GCS). An investigation was conducted to identify both the infection's source and the reasons for the false‐negative screening result. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Red blood cell (RBC) units (cocomponent from the eight donations) were traced, quarantined, and cultured. Specimens from the implicated donor were obtained. Isolates were identified and typed by 16S rRNA and pulsed‐field gel electrophoresis (PFGE). The blood center screening method was reviewed. RESULTS: β‐Hemolytic GCS, cultured from 1 of 8 RBC units, linked the fatal case to a single donor. The donor's throat swab collected 20 days after donation was positive for the presence of GCS, identified as Streptococcus dysgalactiae subsp. equisimilis. Isolates from the recipient, RBC unit, residual PLTs, and donor's throat swab were indistinguishable by PFGE. The donor denied any symptoms of infection before or after donation. PLT bacterial screening at the blood center was performed using a commercially available bacterial detection system (BacT/ALERT, bioMérieux) with a threshold of 15 colony‐forming units per bag. CONCLUSION: An asymptomatic donor was implicated as the source of GCS‐contaminated PLTs. Current screening methods for PLTs are not sufficient to detect all bacterial contamination. Pooled PLTs are a particular challenge because the small volume of individual units places limits on culturing strategies. Improved detection of bacterial contamination of PLTs is needed.     

Prospective, paired crossover comparison of multiple, single-needle plateletpheresis procedures with the Amicus and Trima Accel cell separators

BACKGROUND: The Baxter Amicus Version 2.51 (A) and the Gambro BCT Trima Accel Version 5.0 (T) cell separators may produce multiple platelet (PLT) concentrates within a single donation. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The single-needle multiple plateletpheresis procedures of the two devices were compared in a prospective, randomized, paired crossover study in 60 donors. The 120 donations were compared for donor comfort, collection efficiency, residual white blood cell (WBC) count, and (in selected patients) corrected count increment (CCI). RESULTS: The mean PLT yield and the resultant mean number of units per donation were significantly lower for A (6.06 x 10(11) vs. 7.48 x 10(11) and 2.57 vs. 3.19, respectively, both p < 0.001), in spite of a longer apheresis duration (89 min vs. 79 min; p < 0.001). This resulted in a higher collection rate of T (5.68 x 10(11) PLTs/hr vs. 4.10 x 10(11) PLTs/hr, p < 0.001). Residual WBC count of every unit was fewer than 5 x 10(6), but significantly fewer A-PLT donations contained more than 10(5) WBCs per unit (1 vs. 9, p = 0.008). Although the ACD-A consumption was slightly higher for A (489 mL vs. 469 mL, p = 0.04), a trend to a higher frequency of side effects was found for T (42.4% vs. 23.7%, p = 0.06). The 1-hour CCIs of 33 transfused A-PLT units were comparable with those of 43 T-PLT units (11.8 vs. 13.9, p = 0.480). CONCLUSIONS: Both cell separators showed safe collections of up to 4 PLT units per donation with adequate CCI. T produced a higher PLT yield despite shorter apheresis duration, but with slightly higher residual WBC counts and a trend to a higher side-effect frequency.     

International comparison of the technical efficiency of component preparation

BACKGROUND: Under economical constraints, blood centers need to identify ways to improve their efficiency. Because there is little evidence regarding the technical efficiency of blood centers, international comparisons may be useful in identifying efficiency discrepancies and can reveal opportunities for enhancing efficiency, such as allocating resources more effectively. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Data were collected for years 2000 through 2002 from 16 blood centers in 10 European countries. Input variables included working hours, whole-blood (WB) collections, premises, and equipment, and the output variables were red blood cells and platelets (PLTs). A nonparametric method, data envelopment analysis (DEA), was used in the analyses of technical efficiency in blood component preparation departments. Efficiency scores were calculated with DEA linear programming techniques and evaluated for site characteristics that possibly affect efficiency, such as the production method of PLTs and the proportion of BCs (buffy coats) from WB and BC PLTs from all PLTs produced. RESULTS: With working hours and equipment as inputs, median technical efficiency was 60 percent (range, 41%-100%). Four departments were efficient (efficiency, > 90%), and 12 were inefficient (range, 41-89). Efficiency remained roughly the same in 13 departments through the 3-year study period and decreased in 3. Efficiency was mainly affected by staffing levels (working hours). Efficiency did not directly relate to production volume, method, or any other site characteristic. CONCLUSIONS: The major cause of inefficiency was excess staffing resulting from a suboptimal combination of manpower and production output levels. Further research is needed to manage factors affecting efficiency, such as the fluctuation of demand in production planning.     

Storing apheresis platelets without agitation with simulated shipping conditions during two separate periods: immediately after collection and subsequently between Day 2 and Day 3

BACKGROUND: Apheresis platelet (PLT) units are not routinely agitated during transit. Our study compared the in vitro properties of apheresis PLT units that were stored with continuous agitation (CA) and without continuous agitation (WCA) during two separate periods, immediately after collection and between Day 2 and Day 3 of storage. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Two identical apheresis PLTs units were prepared from collections with Amicus (n = 11, Fenwal, Inc.) and Trima (n = 10, CaridianBCT) cell separators. One apheresis PLT unit was continuously agitated, starting routinely within 30 minutes of collection, and an identical apheresis PLT unit was held without agitation initially for 7 to 8 hours and subsequently for 24 hours between Day 2 and Day 3 of storage. The apheresis PLT units were maintained WCA at 20 to 24°C in a shipping box. In vitro PLT properties were evaluated on Day 1 (day after collection), after 5 and 7 days of storage. RESULTS: With both Amicus and Trima apheresis PLT units, the mean PLT content and concentration of CA and WCA were comparable and essentially constant throughout storage. Mean pH levels (±1 SD) after 5 days for Amicus apheresis PLT units were 6.97 ± 0.20 (WCA) and 7.13 ± 0.16 (p < 0.001, CA) and for Trima apheresis PLT units 6.97 ± 0.21 (WCA) and 7.22 ± 0.17 (p < 0.001, CA). In vitro variables, including percentage of disc PLTs, extent of shape change, and hypotonic stress levels, after 5 days of storage, showed mean differences between WCA and CA that were less than 15%. CONCLUSION: The in vitro results show that apheresis PLT units can be stored without agitation for 7 to 8 hours immediately after collection and also subsequently during storage for 24 hours with minimal influence on in vitro PLT properties compared to continuously agitated PLTs.     

CD 14+ cell collection in non-cytokine-stimulated donors with the COM.TEC cell separator

BACKGROUND: The COM.TEC cell separator (Fresenius Hemocare), equipped with the MNC program (single-stage chamber) and the PBSC-LYM program (dual-stage chamber), was evaluated for CD 14+ cell collection regarding cell yields, collection efficiencies (CEs), and the content of residual cells in harvests. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Twenty-four non-cytokine-stimulated donors underwent 5-L mononuclear cell (MNC) collections on the COM.TEC device to compare both programs. Two software versions (v02.03.05 vs. v 03.00.04) were investigated for optimization of the CD 14+ cell collection process. Blood counts of donors and products were analyzed for CD 14+ cells by flow cytometry and for platelets (PLTs), white blood cells, and red blood cells (RBCs) by a blood cell counter. RESULTS: In 5-L collections, the MNC program resulted in high CEs (83+/- 23%) and yields (1.2 x 10(9)+/- 0.6 x 10(9) per unit) of CD 14+ cells, but the products showed high residual PLTs. The use of a dual-stage chamber in the PBSC-LYM program produced a low content of residual PLTs (0.7 x 10(11) +/- 0.3 x 10(11) per unit) and RBCs but failed to reach a target of 1 x 10(9) CD 14+ cells. Modulated light to stabilize the buffy-coat detection by the interface monitor significantly improved CD 14+ cell enrichment. By use of the PBSC-LYM program, higher centrifuge velocity (1700 rpm [382 x g] vs. 1500 rpm [297 x g]) improved significantly CD 14+ cell yields (0.7 x 10(9) vs. 0.5 x 10(9) cells). CONCLUSION: A pure CD 14+ cell product with low numbers of residual cells was obtained by the PBSC-LYM program, which could be useful for good manufacturing practice-conformed production within closed systems. The MNC program offers the collection of high CD 14+ cell yields with excellent CEs but also high residual PLT counts.