Dosimetric characteristics of 6 and 10 MV unflattened photon beams

Purpose

To determine dosimetric properties of unflattened megavoltage photon beams.

Materials and methods

Dosimetric data including depth dose, profiles, output factors and phantom scatter factors from three different beam qualities provided by Elekta Precise linacs, operated with and without flattening filter were examined. Additional measurements of leaf transmission, leakage radiation and surface dose were performed. In flattening filter free (FFF) mode a 6-mm thick copper filter was placed into the beam to stabilize it.

Results

Depths of dose maxima for flattened and unflattened beams did not deviate by more than 2 mm and penumbral widths agreed within 1 mm. In FFF mode the collimator exchange effect was found to be on average 0.3% for rectangular fields. Between maximum and minimum field size head scatter factors of unflattened beams showed on average 40% and 56% less variation for 6 and 10 MV beams than conventional beams. Phantom scatter factors for FFF beams differed up to 4% from the published reference data. For field sizes smaller than 15 cm, surface doses relative to the dose at d_max increased for unflattened beams with maximum differences of 7% at 6 MV and 25% at 10 MV for a 5 × 5 cm² field. For a 30 × 30 cm² field, relative surface dose decreased by about 10% for FFF beams. Leaf transmission on the central axis was 0.3% and 0.4% lower for unflattened 6 and 10 MV beams, respectively. Leakage radiation was reduced by 52% for 6 MV and by 65% for 10 MV unflattened beams.

Conclusions

The results of the study were independently confirmed at two radiotherapy centres. Phantom scatter reference data need to be reconsidered for medical accelerators operated without a flattening filter.     

Radiation therapy with unflattened photon beams: Dosimetric accuracy of advanced dose calculation algorithms

Purpose

To compare the dosimetric accuracy of advanced dose calculation algorithms for flattened (FF) and unflattened (FFF) photon beams.

Material and methods

We compared the enhanced collapsed cone (eCC) algorithm implemented in OncentraMasterplan and the XVMC (MC) code in Monaco. Test plans were created for 10 MV FF and FFF beams. Single beam tests were delivered to radiochromic films positioned within a solid water phantom and evaluated with 1D γ-index analysis. Conformal plans were verified with ion chambers in an anthropomorphic thorax phantom. IMRT plans were applied to the Delta4 system and evaluated with γ-criteria of 3% and 3 mm.

Results

1D γ-index evaluation revealed significantly lower (p < 0.05) average γ_mean-values of 0.46 ± 0.22 for MC calculated FFF profiles compared to average values of 0.53 ± 0.27 detected for FF beams. Respective values for eCC were 0.42 ± 0.27/0.38 ± 0.26 (FF/FFF). When considering off-axis profiles separately, we found significantly reduced average γ_mean-values for FFF and both algorithms (MC: 0.55 ± 24 vs. 0.45 ± 0.21, eCC: 0.41 ± 0.24 vs. 0.35 ± 0.22). No significant differences were detected on-axis. Absolute dosimetry in the anthropomorphic phantom revealed superior results for MC based dose calculation, with mean deviations of 0.8 ± 0.8/0.0 ± 1.0% compared to −0.1 ± 1.7/−0.5 ± 0.1.7% (FF/FFF) for the eCC algorithm. IMRT plans showed similar results for both linac modes.

Conclusions

The dose calculation accuracy for unflattened beams was found to be at least as high as for flattened beams. The slightly improved dose calculation accuracy observed for off-axis profiles for single FFF beams did not directly translate into better verification results for composite IMRT plans.     

Impact of a flattening filter free linear accelerator on structural shielding design

PurposeThe present study aimed to assess the effects of a flattening filter free medical accelerator on structural shielding demands of a treatment vault of a medical linear accelerator. We tried to answer the question, to what extent the required thickness of the shielding barriers can be reduced if instead of the standard flattened photon beams unflattened ones are used.Material and MethodsWe chose both an experimental as well as a theoretical approach. On the one hand we measured photon dose rates at protected places outside the treatment room and compared the obtained results for flattened and unflattened beams. On the other hand we complied with international guidelines for adequate treatment vault design and calculated the shielding barriers according to the therein given specifications. Measurements were performed with an Elekta Precise? linac providing nominal photon energies of 6 and 10 MV. This machine underwent already earlier some modifications in order to be able to operate both with and without a flattening filter. Photon dose rates were measured with a LB133-1 dose rate meter manufactured by Berthold. To calculate the thickness of shielding barriers we referred to the Austrian standard ÖNORM S 5216 and to the US American NCRP Report No. 151.ResultsWe determined a substantial photon dose rate reduction for all measurement points and photon energies. For unflattened 6 MV beams a reduction factor ranging from 1.4 to 1.8 was identified. The corresponding values for unflattened 10 MV beams were 2.1 and 3.2. The performed shielding calculations indicated the same tendency: For all relevant radiation components we found a reduction in shielding thickness when unflattened beams were used. The required thickness of primary barriers was reduced up to 8.0%, the thickness of secondary barriers up to 11.4%, respectively.ConclusionsFor an adequate dimensioning of treatment vault shielding barriers it is by no means irrelevant if the accommodated linac operates with or without a flattening filter. The lower consumption of shielding space and material for new treatment vaults housing a FFF machine may reduce building costs, whereas for existing vaults one might benefit in terms of increased weekly workload. Also a more frequent use of monitor unit intense treatment techniques as well as aiming at reduced occupational exposure for staff is conceivable.     

Volumetric modulated arc therapy with flattening filter free (FFF) beams for stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in patients with medically inoperable early stage non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

Purpose

To assess the impact of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) with flattening filter free (FFF) beams for stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in inoperable stage I NSCLC. Current data were compared against a cohort of patients previously treated with advanced conformal techniques (3DCRT) based on conformal arcs.

Methods and materials

From July 2006 to December 2011 132 patients underwent SBRT, 86 by 3DCRT with flattened beams (FF), while the last 46 with VMAT RapidArc and unflattened beams (FFF). All patients were treated with 48 Gy in four fractions of 12 Gy each. Patients underwent follow-up. Clinical outcome was evaluated with thoracic and abdominal CT scan and 18FDG-CTPET before and after treatment.

Results

Both techniques achieved adequate dose conformity to the target but with a statistically significant reduction of ipsilateral lung doses in RapidArc plans and also of Beam-on-Time (BOT) with FFF mode. The median follow up was 16 months (range 2–24 months). At 1 year, local control rate was 100% with FFF beams compared with 92.5% with FF beams (p = 0.03).

Conclusions

SBRT with FFF beams permitted us a safe delivery of high dose per fraction in a short treatment time and resulted in an earlier radiological response compared with FF beams.     

Identifying afterloading PDR and HDR brachytherapy errors using real-time fiber-coupled Al2O3:C dosimetry and a novel statistical error decision criterion

Background and purpose

The feasibility of a real-time in vivo dosimeter to detect errors has previously been demonstrated. The purpose of this study was to: (1) quantify the sensitivity of the dosimeter to detect imposed treatment errors under well controlled and clinically relevant experimental conditions, and (2) test a new statistical error decision concept based on full uncertainty analysis.

Materials and methods

Phantom studies of two gynecological cancer PDR and one prostate cancer HDR patient treatment plans were performed using tandem ring applicators or interstitial needles. Imposed treatment errors, including interchanged pairs of afterloader guide tubes and 2-20 mm source displacements, were monitored using a real-time fiber-coupled carbon doped aluminum oxide (Al₂O₃:C) crystal dosimeter that was positioned in the reconstructed tumor region. The error detection capacity was evaluated at three dose levels: dwell position, source channel, and fraction. The error criterion incorporated the correlated source position uncertainties and other sources of uncertainty, and it was applied both for the specific phantom patient plans and for a general case (source-detector distance 5-90 mm and position uncertainty 1-4 mm).

Results

Out of 20 interchanged guide tube errors, time-resolved analysis identified 17 while fraction level analysis identified two. Channel and fraction level comparisons could leave 10 mm dosimeter displacement errors unidentified. Dwell position dose rate comparisons correctly identified displacements ?5 mm.

Conclusion

This phantom study demonstrates that Al₂O₃:C real-time dosimetry can identify applicator displacements ?5 mm and interchanged guide tube errors during PDR and HDR brachytherapy. The study demonstrates the shortcoming of a constant error criterion and the advantage of a statistical error criterion.     

新型双能医用直线加速器非均整剂量学特性研究

目的 利用新型双能医用直线加速器(医科达,Versa HDTM),研究6、10 MV能量的FFF和FF光子束剂量学特点,期望找到FFF射束的剂量学特点及优势,为临床应用提供依据。方法比较FFF、FF射束的深度剂量分布,离轴比剂量分布,辐射野大小、半影宽度与野外剂量,准直器散射因子和总散射因子。结果 (1)束流能量匹配后的FFF射束与常规均整射束能量一致,各射野百分深度剂量在10 cm深度区域的匹配误差<1%。(2) FFF射束离轴比剂量分布随深度的变化较小。(3) FFF射束的射野大小、半影宽度均比FF射束的变化小,且FFF射束的射野大小、半影宽度,分别随射野和深度的增加逐渐增大;FFF射束各射野的野外剂量比均整射束更低。(4) FFF射束各射野的准直器散射因子和总散射因子,随射野、深度的变化趋势均比FF射束小。结论 去除均整器后可明显提高剂量率、减少放疗时间、降低机头的漏射和散射,故FFF除均整性外的剂量学优势,可用于临床SRT。     

Dosimetric Comparison between Acuros XB (AXB) and Anisotropic Analytical Algorithm (AAA) in Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy

Aim: Dose calculation accuracy between Anisotropic Analytical Algorithm (AAA) and Acuros XB (AXB) for various megavoltage (MV) photon beams for both flattening filter (FF) and flattening filter free (FFF) beams and to validate the accuracy of these dose calculations using inhomogeneous phantom in volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). Material and methods: A Cheese Phantom having 20 holes that can be filled with all virtual water plugs or set of density calibration plugs  was used for VMAT planning using two different algorithms using either single or double arc. Further phantom was used  irradiate plan in linear accelerator and the point doses measured using a 0.053 cc A1SL ionization chamber along electrometer . Different plans, cylindrical shape, C-shaped and donut targets were planned 6MV, 10MV, 6FFF MV and 10FFF MV beam energy. Result: The minimum average mean dose difference was 1.2% for PTV structures between AAA and AXB (p=0.02). Apart from these structures, the following density plugs have a more than 2% difference in maximum dose with statistical significance. (i) Solid water (MD=6.1%, p=0.016), (ii) Bone 200 (2.3%, p=0.029), (iii) CB_30% (MD=2.4%, p=0.050) and (iv) Cortical bone (MD=4.3%, p=0.018). In 6MV FFF and 10 MV FFF plans, the difference between AAA and AXB was not statistically significant (Fig 3). The Conformity index for the AAA less than that of AXB, in all energies and for all the PTVs. The CI was better in AXB than AAA, but the CI was not having much variation due to changes in beam energies, particularly for Cylinder shaped PTV. Conclusion: All combinations of beam energy AAA showed higher values in the maximum dose than the Acuros XB, except for the lung insert. Nonetheless, AAA showed a higher mean dose than the Acuros XB. Differences between these two algorithms for most of the beam energies are minimal.     

AAA and PBC calculation accuracy in the surface build-up region in tangential beam treatments. Phantom and breast case study with the Monte Carlo code penelope

Background and purpose

In tangential beam treatments accurate dose calculation of the absorbed dose in the build-up region is of major importance, in particular when the target has superficial extension close to the skin. In most analytical treatment planning systems (TPSs) calculations depend on the experimental measurements introduced by the user in which accuracy might be limited by the type of detector employed to perform them. To quantify the discrepancy between analytically calculated and delivered dose in the build-up region, near the skin of a patient, independent Monte Carlo (MC) simulations using the penelope code were performed. Dose distributions obtained with MC simulations were compared with those given by the Pencil Beam Convolution (PBC) algorithm and the Analytical Anisotropic Algorithm (AAA) implemented in the commercial TPS Eclipse.

Material and methods

A cylindrical phantom was used to approximate the breast contour of a patient for MC simulations and the TPS. Calculations of the absorbed doses were performed for 6 and 18 MV beams for four different angles of incidence: 15°, 30°, 45° and 75° and different field sizes: 3 × 3 cm², 10 × 10 cm² and 40 × 40 cm². Absorbed doses along the phantom central axis were obtained with both the PBC algorithm and the AAA and compared to those estimated by the MC simulations. Additionally, a breast patient case was calculated with two opposed 6 MV photon beams using all the aforementioned analytical and stochastic algorithms.

Results

For the 6 MV photon beam in the phantom case, both the PBC algorithm and the AAA tend to underestimate the absorbed dose in the build-up region in comparison to MC results. These differences are clinically irrelevant and are included in a 1 mm range. This tendency is also confirmed in the breast patient case. For the 18 MV beam the PBC algorithm underestimates the absorbed dose with respect to the AAA. In comparison to MC simulations the PBC algorithm tends to underestimate the dose after the first 2-3 mm of tissue for larger angles but seems to be in good agreement for smaller angles. In the first millimetre of depth instead the PBC tends to overestimate the dose for smaller angles and underestimate it for larger angle of incidence. Instead, the AAA overestimates absorbed doses with respect to MC results for all angles of incidence and at all depths. This behaviour seems to be due to the electron contamination model, which is not able to provide accurate absorbed doses in the build-up region. Even for this case the differences are unlikely to be of clinical significance as 18 MV is not usually used to treat superficial targets.

Conclusions

The PBC algorithm and the AAA implemented in the TPS Eclipse system version 8.0.05, both yield equivalent calculations, after the first 2 mm of tissue, of the absorbed dose for 6 MV photon beams when a grid size smaller than 5 mm is used. When 18 MV photon beams are used care should be taken because the results of the AAA are highly dependent on the beam configuration.     

Treatment Planning With Unflattened as Compared to Flattened Beams for Bilateral Carcinoma of the Breast

Aim: To evaluate the plan quality of 6MV unflattened (UFB) and flattened beam (FB) photon energy using AAA dose calculation algorithms for volumetric arc therapy. Materials and Methods: Plans were generated for bilateral carcinoma of breast and the dose prescribed was 50.4Gy in 28 fractions. Two different plans were made for each patient using 6MV FB and 6MV UFB. Dose calculations were performed on an AAA dose calculation algorithm. Plans were generated on Eclipse TPS and were capable of being delivered with a true beam STx linear accelerator. The homogeneity index (HI), conformity index (CI), normal tissue integral dose (NTID), and effect of low dose volume on normal tissue and monitor units (MU) were noted. Results: All the plans were clinically acceptable. The HI and CI of 6MV UF rapid arc (RA) plans were higher than with the 6MV FB plan (1.16±0.05 and 0.12±0.00 respectively). There was no appreciable difference observed in Organ at risk (OAR) doses. The mean NTID and low dose volume were significantly low with 6MV RA UFB as compared to FB. 6MV RA UFB required a 35% higher MU than with the 6MV RA plan (p<0.05). Conclusion: RA plans generated with UFB on Eclipse TPS achieved target volume coverage and preserved OAR’s essentially similar to 6MV RA FB plans. However RA plans generated in Varian Eclipse of UFB were superior with respect to mean NTID and low dose volumes in normal tissue.     

Effect of high dose per pulse flattening filter-free beams on cancer cell survival

Purpose

To investigate if there is a statistically significant difference in cancer cell survival using a high dose per pulse flattening filter-free (FFF) beam compared to a standard flattened beam.

Material and methods

To validate the radiobiological effect of the flattened and FFF beam, two glioblastoma cell lines were treated with either 5 or 10 Gy using different dose rates. Dose verification was performed and colony formation assays were carried out. To compare the predictability of our data, radiobiological models were included.

Results

The results presented here demonstrate that irradiation of glioblastoma cell lines using the FFF beam is more efficient in reducing clonogenic cell survival than the standard flattened beam, an effect which becomes more significant the higher the single dose. Interestingly, in our experimental setting, the radiobiological effect of the FFF beam is dependent on dose per pulse rather than on delivery time. The used radiobiological models are able to describe the observed dose rate dependency between 6 and 24 Gy/min.

Conclusion

The results presented here show that dose per pulse might become a crucial factor which influences cancer cell survival. Using high dose rates, currently used radiobiological models as well as molecular mechanisms involved urgently need to be re-examined.     

Dose escalation in the radiotherapy of non-small-cell lung cancer with aperture-based intensity modulation and photon beam energy optimization for non-preselected patients

Purpose

To verify the potential of aperture-based intensity-modulated radiotherapy (AB-IMRT) to realize dose escalation plans for non-preselected non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, using photon beam energy optimization.

Methods and materials

Seven cases of NSCLC were retrospectively studied. Clinical reference plans were made at 60 Gy by an experienced dosimetrist. Dose escalation was applied to PTV2, a subvolume within the main PTV1. Escalation plans were optimized by considering beam angles (table and gantry), energy (6 and 23 MV) and weights, for an increasing dose to the PTV2, starting from 66 Gy and keeping 30 fractions.

Results

In five cases, doses over 78 Gy could be achieved before exceeding organs at risk (OARs) standard tolerance. Peripheral overdosages, as well as lung and spinal cord tolerance doses, limited escalation. Means ± SD V_95% parameters were (97.3 ± 0.9)% for PTV1s and (96.7 ± 2.2)% for PTV2s. Doses to OARs were also maintained at acceptable levels. Optimized plans made use of both low- and high-energy beams and had a similar number of monitor units compared to the 60 Gy clinical plans.

Conclusions

The AB-IMRT system can successfully realize dose escalation for a sizeable number of cases. Plans produced contained few large segments, and are applicable to a wide range of tumor volumes and locations.     

Intensity modulated radiosurgery of brain metastases with flattening filter-free beams

Purpose

Flattening filter free (FFF) irradiation potentially reduces treatment delivery time in radiosurgery thus eliminating intrafraction motion and increasing patient comfort. We compared plan quality and efficiency of VMAT and IMRT plans for FFF- and standard delivery for brain metastases with single fraction doses of 20 Gy and validated the dosimetric accuracy of the FFF delivery.

Material and Methods

CT data of 15 patients with brain metastases were included in this study. For every patient, 2 IMRT- and 2 VMAT-plans were created using a high-resolution MLC with two different delivery modes (6 MV standard vs. 6 MV FFF). Plan quality and efficiency was assessed by analysis of conformity, homogeneity, dose gradients, treatment delivery time and number of monitor units (MU). Dosimetric evaluation was performed for 10 FFF plans with radiochromic film and ion chamber.

Results

Plan quality was similar for both approaches. FFF provided a mean treatment time reduction of 51.5% with similar MU for VMAT and IMRT for this low-modulation paradigm. The dosimetric validations showed an absolute dose deviation of +0.93 ± 0.99% and γ-index analysis (3%/3 mm and 3%/1 mm) resulted in agreement of 99.08 ± 1.58% respectively 93.46 ± 2.41%.

Conclusion

FFF radiosurgery is an efficient technique for intensity modulated hypofractionated or single fraction treatments with similar plan quality when compared to flattened beams at reduced treatment time.     

Feasibility of tomotherapy to reduce normal lung and cardiac toxicity for distal esophageal cancer compared to three-dimensional radiotherapy

Purpose

To compare the effectiveness of tomotherapy and three-dimensional (3D) conformal radiotherapy to spare normal critical structures (spinal cord, lungs, and ventricles) from excessive radiation in patients with distal esophageal cancers.

Materials and methods

A retrospective dosimetric study of nine patients who had advanced gastro-esophageal (GE) junction cancer (7) or thoracic esophageal cancer (2) extending into the distal esophagus. Two plans were created for each of the patients. A three-dimensional plan was constructed with either three (anteroposterior, right posterior oblique, and left posterior oblique) or four (right anterior oblique, left anterior oblique, right posterior oblique, and left posterior oblique) fields. The second plan was for tomotherapy. Doses were 45 Gy to the PTV with an integrated boost of 5 Gy for tomotherapy.

Results

Mean lung dose was respectively 7.4 and 11.8 Gy (p = 0.004) for tomotherapy and 3D plans. Corresponding values were 12.4 and 18.3 Gy (p = 0.006) for cardiac ventricles. Maximum spinal cord dose was respectively 31.3 and 37.4 Gy (p < 0.007) for tomotherapy and 3D plans. Homogeneity index was two for both groups.

Conclusions

Compared to 3D conformal radiotherapy, tomotherapy decreased significantly the amount of normal tissue irradiated and may reduce treatment toxicity for possible dose escalation in future prospective studies.     

Use of megavoltage cine-images for studying intra-thoracic motion during radiotherapy for locally advanced lung cancer

Background and purpose

Use of planning 4-dimensional CT (4DCT) scans often permits use of smaller target volumes for thoracic tumors but this assumes a reproducible pattern of motion during radiotherapy. We compared cranio-caudal (CC) motion on MV cine-images acquired during treatment with that seen on planning 4DCT.

Methods and materials

A pre-programmable respiratory motion phantom and a software tool for motion assessment were used to validate the use of MV cine-images for motion detection. MV cine-images acquired in 20 patients with node-positive lung cancer were analyzed using the same software. Intra-fraction CC motion on 6 MV cine-images from each patient was compared with CC motion on their planning 4DCT.

Results

Software-based motion measurement on MV cine-images from the phantom corresponded to actual motion. Mean CC motion of primary tumor, carina and hilus on 4DCT was 7.3 mm (range 2-13.8 mm), 6.8 mm (1.8-21.2) and 11.0 mm (4.2-15.1), respectively. Corresponding intra-fraction motion on MV cine was 4.1 mm (0.6-13.6 mm); 2.7 mm (0-10 mm) and 6.0 mm (1.8-14.4 mm), respectively. The tumor, hilus and carina could be tracked in 95%, 88% and 38% of the MV cine-images, respectively.

Conclusions

Intra-fraction motion can be reliably measured using MV-cine images from a phantom. Motion discrepancies identified on MV cine-images can identify patients in whom planning 4DCT scans are not representative.     

Monte Carlo study shows no significant difference in second cancer risk between 6- and 18-MV intensity-modulated radiation therapy

Purpose

To evaluate the photon and neutron out-of-field dose equivalents from 6- and 18-MV intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and to investigate the impact of the differences on the associated risk of induced second malignancy using a Monte Carlo model.

Methods and materials

A Monte Carlo model created with MCNPX was used to calculate the out-of-field photon dose and neutron dose equivalent from simulated IMRT of the prostate conducted at beam energies of 6 and 18 MV. The out-of-field dose equivalent was calculated at the locations of sensitive organs in an anthropomorphic phantom. Based on these doses, the risk of secondary malignancy was calculated based on organ-, gender-, and age-specific risk coefficients for a 50-year-old man.

Results

The Monte Carlo model predicted much lower neutron dose equivalents than had been determined previously. Further analysis illuminated the large uncertainties in the neutron dose equivalent and demonstrated the need for better determination of this value, which plays a large role in estimating the risk of secondary malignancies. The Monte Carlo calculations found that the differences in the risk of secondary malignancies conferred by high-energy IMRT versus low-energy IMRT are minimal and insignificant, contrary to prior findings.

Conclusions

The risk of secondary malignancy associated with high-energy radiation therapy may not be as large as previously reported, and likely should not deter the use of high-energy beams. However, the large uncertainties in neutron dose equivalents at specific locations within the patient warrant further study so that the risk of secondary cancers can be estimated with greater accuracy.