Closed suction or penrose drainage after partial nephrectomy: does it matter?

PURPOSE: Prospective studies in the general surgery literature have shown fewer wound related complications with closed suction drainage than with open passive drainage. Nevertheless, some urologists avoid closed suction drains after partial nephrectomy mainly because of a theoretical increased risk of a prolonged urinary leak or delayed hemorrhage. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed the records of 184 patients who underwent 197 consecutive partial nephrectomies at our institution. Closed suction or open passive (Penrose) drainage was used based on surgeon preference. Drain type was compared with duration of use and the incidence of relevant complications. RESULTS: A Penrose drain was used in 37.6% (74 of 197) of partial nephrectomies and a closed suction drain was used in 62.4% (123). Clinical characteristics were equivalent between both groups, including age, body mass index, tumor size (mean 3.1 cm), number of renal tumors excised, estimated blood loss and operative time. There was no statistically significant difference in the duration of drainage between the Penrose group (mean 7.1 days) and the closed suction group (7.8 days). While we found variation in the incidence of relevant complications by drain type, none of these differences was statistically significant. Complications included prolonged urinary drainage in 7.6% of cases (8.9% closed suction, 5.4% Penrose), wound infection or perinephric abscess in 3.6% (2.4% closed suction, 5.4% Penrose) and delayed hemorrhage in 1.5% (2.4% closed suction, 0 Penrose). CONCLUSIONS: No statistically significant differences in postoperative morbidity were observed between the use of closed suction or Penrose retroperitoneal drains after partial nephrectomy.     

Drainage versus nondrainage in simultaneous bilateral total hip arthroplasties

A prospective study of 48 patients (96 hips) who had undergone primary simultaneous bilateral total hip arthroplasty was conducted to assess the effect of postoperative suction drainage on wound healing and infection. A suction drain was placed by randomization of the drained versus undrained side. The same surgical technique was used in all total hip arthroplasty wounds. Statistical analysis of the results showed significant differences with respect to drainage from the wound, soaked dressings requiring reinforcements, ecchymosis, and erythema about the wound in the group without drainage. There was no specific correlation between the incidence of wound complications and infection after total hip arthroplasty and the use or nonuse of closed-suction drainage. The hip score and range of motion of the hip were unaffected by the use or nonuse of the drains. The cost of 1 set of hemovac drains is $135 and the cost for 4–5 dressings and bed sheet changes is about $50. Although the hemovac is more expensive, the authors recommend the routine use of suction drains for wounds after primary total hip arthroplasty to reduce drainage, soaked dressings requiring reinforcement, ecchymosis and erythema around the wound, and psychological impact on the patient's fear of bleeding.     

Should breast biopsy cavities be drained?

A total of 112 women was entered into a randomised study to investigate the effects of suction drainage on haematoma formation in breast biopsy wounds. Of 107 evaluable patients, 52 received drainage and 55 had no drain. The wounds were examined 1 week after operation when the volume of wound haematoma was measured using ultrasonography. Haematomas were present in 48 (87%) patients with undrained wounds compared with 34 (65%) patients with drained wounds (P = 0.014, chi 2 test). Median haematoma volume was 20 ml (range 0-172.5 ml) in the undrained group compared with 2 ml (range 0-100 ml) in the drained group (P = 0.001, Mann-Whitney U test). There was one wound infection in each group. There was no difference in median pain score or duration of pain between the groups. While suction drainage significantly reduces the incidence and volume of wound haematomas, this does not appear to influence outcome.     

Prolonged suction drainage prevents serous wound discharge after cardiac surgery.

A series of 180 patients was randomised to two groups after median sternotomy performed for cardiac surgery in order to evaluate the effect of suction drainage on serous wound discharge. In group A all wounds were drained using two conventional mediastinal drains, while in group B one suction drain and one conventional mediastinal drain were employed. Five patients developed serous wound discharge in group B compared with 14 in group A (chi 2, P < 0.02). There were no significant differences between the rates of major wound infection (group A, n = 1; group B, n = 1) or the incidence of postoperative pericardial effusion assessed by echocardiography (group A, n = 10; group B, n = 5).     

The use of postoperative suction drainage in total hip arthroplasty.

Two hundred eight primary total hip arthroplasties were reviewed to evaluate the effect of closed suction drainage. This review included 45 hips in which closed drains were used and 163 hips in which drains were not used. These two groups were compared for possible differences in wound problems, temperature elevations, changes in Hgb/Hct, and the need for transfusions. There was no statistically significant difference in postoperative temperatures or decrease in Hgb. However, there were four superficial wound infections in the drained group and three superficial wound infections in the non-drained group (P < .025). There were no deep infections in either group. These findings suggest closed suction drainage provides no apparent advantage in uncomplicated primary total hip arthroplasty.     

Wound drainage after proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) fixation may negatively affect the patients with intertrochanteric fractures: A prospective randomized controlled trial

Introduction: The effect of using closed suction drainage system with the proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) system fixation on outcomes in treating intertrochanteric fractures (ITFs) is still unknown. This prospective randomized controlled trial aimed to examine whether routine drainage is useful for PFNA fixation in ITFs.Methods: A total of 80 patients with acute ITFs were treated with closed or mini-open reduction with PFNA fixation at the National Cheng Kung University Hospital and 60 eligible patients were randomized for whether to receive suction drainage. In clinical outcomes, the visual analog scale (VAS), morphine equivalent dosage, injured thigh width, body temperature, wound condition and wound infection were measured on postoperative day 1, 2, 4, 10, and 90. In laboratory outcomes, we evaluated hemoglobin and hematocrit levels postoperatively at different time points. Blood transfusion and total blood loss (TBL) were measured by Mercuriali's formula in millimeter.Results: The results revealed that the amount of blood transfusion received by the drained group (543.3 mL) was more than that by the undrained group (367.8 mL; p = 0.0074), and similarly, TBL in the drained group (750.1 mL) was more than that in the undrained group (537.4 mL; p = 0.0067). Regarding clinical and laboratory outcomes, compared with the undrained group, the drained group had a higher VAS score on postoperative day 2 (p = 0.0216). No difference was observed between the 2 groups for morphine equivalent dosage, thigh swelling, wound infection and hematoma, hospitalization period, or total number of complications at every time point after index procedure.Conclusions: Blood transfusion requirement and TBL were higher in the drained group than in the undrained group of PFNA fixation for ITFs. In addition, the closed drainage system may have manifested no short-term benefit for wound condition postoperatively.     

The use of postoperative suction drainage in total knee arthroplasty

A retrospective review of 299 total knee arthroplasties performed between 1973 and 1983 revealed 170 knees in which postoperative suction drainage was used and 129 knees in which drains were not used. Comparison between these two groups revealed no statistically significant difference in wound problems, postoperative temperatures, or resulting range of motion. However, blood transfusions were given more than twice as often to the patients whose knees were drained (39% compared to 16%, p less than .01). The drained group also had a greater decrease in hemoglobin than the nondrained group (3.1 gm compared to 2.6 gm, p less than .01). In a review of these patients, no advantage was found for the use of postoperative suction drainage in the uncomplicated total knee arthroplasty.     

Cholecystectomy with and without drainage.

The authors studied the effect of intraoperative drainage, presence of postoperative pyrexia, influence of appendectomy, chest complications and wound infection in 200 patients who had undergone routine uncomplicated cholecystectomy. One hundred patients in whom no drain was inserted were matched with 100 patients whose cholecystectomies, performed during the same period, included placement of a drain. There were 10 males and 90 females in each group; the mean age was 40.5 years in the undrained group and 40.4 years in the drained group. There was a significantly (P less than 0.05) higher frequency of chest complications, longer hospital stay and pronounced postoperative pyrexia (P less than 0.003) in the group with drainage. The rate of wound infection was substantially increased in both groups by adding appendectomy to the procedure, particularly if drains were not used. It is evident that the routine placement of a drain in an uncomplicated cholecystectomy is unnecessary and may even be harmful.     

Closed suction drainage for hip and knee arthroplasty. A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: The use of closed-suction drainage systems after total joint replacement is a common practice. The theoretical advantages for the use of drains is a reduction in the occurrence of wound hematomas and infection. The aim of this meta-analysis was to determine, on the basis of the evidence from randomized controlled trials, the advantages and adverse effects of surgical drains. METHODS: All randomized trials, as far as we know, that compared patients managed with closed-suction drainage systems and those managed without a drain following elective hip and knee arthroplasty were considered. The trials were identified with use of searches of the Cochrane Collaboration with no restriction on languages or source. Two authors independently extracted the data, and the methods of all identified trials were assessed. RESULTS: Eighteen studies involving 3495 patients with 3689 wounds were included in the analysis. The pooled results indicated that there was no significant difference between the wounds treated with a drain and those treated without a drain with respect to the occurrence of wound infection (relative risk, 0.73; 95% confidence interval, 0.47 to 1.14), wound hematoma (relative risk, 1.73; 95% confidence interval, 0.74 to 4.07), or reoperations for wound complications (relative risk, 0.52; 95% confidence interval, 0.13 to 1.99). A drained wound was associated with a significantly greater need for transfusion (relative risk, 1.43; 95% confidence interval, 1.19 to 1.72). Reinforcement of wound dressings was required more frequently in the group managed without drains. No difference between the groups was seen with respect to limb-swelling, venous thrombosis, or hospital stay. CONCLUSIONS: Studies to date have indicated that closed suction drainage increases the transfusion requirements after elective hip and knee arthroplasty and has no major benefits. Further randomized trials with use of larger numbers of patients with full reporting of outcomes are indicated before the absence of any benefit, particularly for the outcome of wound infection, can be proved.     

Gravity drainage versus suction drainage: an experimental and clinical study

The importance of wound drainage in casualty and plastic surgery is unquestioned. The most common form is suction drainage. This involves the disadvantage that the drain can become attached to the tissue by suction, stopping the flow and blocking the drain. In addition, the secretion reservoir must be made of rigid material, which means large package sizes are inevitable. Encouraged by our knowledge of silicone drains, we carried out a study comparing silicone drains (without vacuum) and PVC drains (with vacuum suction). Electron-microscope studies of the PVC drains used for suction drainage revealed adhesion of wound secretion and cell detritus to the inner wall and the drainage perforations after less than 24 h. No occlusion and almost no adherence was observed with silicone gravity drains. When compared in clinical use for joint drainage, neither system had any severe complications. Removal of gravity drains was considerably less painful than withdrawal of suction drains. In soft tissue drainage the volume of secretion drained off was more constant and obviously larger with gravity drainage. From these results we conclude that gravity drainage can replace suction drainage to considerable advantage.     

A prospective, randomised, controlled trial of the use of drains in total hip arthroplasty

The routine use of surgical drains in total hip arthroplasty remains controversial. They have not been shown to decrease the rate of wound infection significantly and can provide a retrograde route for it. Their use does not reduce the size or incidence of post-operative wound haematomas. This prospective, randomised study was designed to evaluate the role of drains in routine total hip arthroplasty.We investigated 552 patients (577 hips) undergoing unilateral or bilateral total hip arthroplasty who had been randomised to either having a drain for 24 hours or not having a drain. All patients followed standardised pre-, intra-, and post-operative regimes and were independently assessed using the Harris hip score before operation and at six, 18 and 36 months follow-up.The rate of superficial and deep infection was 2.9% and 0.4%, respectively, in the drained group and 4.8% and 0.7%, respectively in the undrained group. One patient in the undrained group had a haematoma which did not require drainage or transfusion. The rate of transfusion after operation in the drained group was significantly higher than for undrained procedures (p < 0.042). The use of a drain did not influence the post-operative levels of haemoglobin, the revision rates, Harris hip scores, the length of hospital stay or the incidence of thromboembolism. We conclude that drains provide no clear advantage at total hip arthroplasty, represent an additional cost, and expose patients to a higher risk of transfusion.     

Passive tube and suction drainage after elective cholecystectomy--a comparison using ultrasonography.

Daily ultrasonography of the gallbladder bed was performed in patients with suction or passive tube drains after elective cholecystectomy. A total of 19 patients was randomized to suction drainage and 17 to passive tube drainage. A policy of early drain removal was followed. No significant difference was found between the volume drained and the size of collection detected in either group. Significant bile leaks were detected and were adequately drained by suction and passive tube drains. There were no complications from drains. In view of these findings, we advocate short-term drainage of the gallbladder bed after both open and laparoscopic cholecystectomy using the drain of the surgeon's choice.     

Optimal timing of wound drain removal following total joint arthroplasty

Closed suction drains reduce postoperative hematoma formation, but create an entry portal for bacteria and thus increase the risk of infection. This study attempts to establish when the risks of wound drainage outweigh the benefits. In a prospective clinical trial, wound drains were used in all patients having a total knee or total hip arthroplasty. Timing of drain removal and amount drained were recorded. Drain-site swabs were sent with drain tips for bacteriology. Results suggest that the likelihood of bacterial colonization increases while wound drainge decreases with time. The authors conclude that the optimal time to remove drains is 24 hours after total joint arthroplasty.     

Prophylactic closed suction drainage of femoral wounds in patients undergoing vascular reconstruction

Prophylactic closed suction drainage has been advocated in a variety of surgical wounds, but its use in wounds involving vascular anastomoses has not been studied. Fifty patients undergoing lower extremity revascularization that required bilateral groin incisions were randomly assigned to have either the right or left side of the groin drained with a closed suction catheter. The contralateral wound was closed without drainage. Statistically there was no difference between wound closed with drains and undrained wounds in the occurrence of hematomas, seromas, lymphoceles, superficial infections, subcutaneous infections, or graft infections; although serious complications were more frequent in the drained wounds. Prophylactic closed suction drainage appears to offer no advantage over closure without drainage in wounds of the groin resulting from elective vascular operations.     

A minimalist approach to the care of the indwelling closed suction drain: a prospective analysis of local wound complications

Despite their long-standing and prevalent use, closed suction drains lack a standardized postoperative care protocol. The authors present a prospective analysis of local wound problems associated with a minimalist approach to care of the drain exit site. A total of 73 patients undergoing a variety of procedures had 192 closed suction drains left in place on average over 10 days after surgery. Drain care consisted of daily showering with soap and water for the skin, no dressings, and stripping and emptying of the drain by the patient. Ninety-one percent of the patients followed the drain protocol and showered postoperatively without particular attention to the drains. There were 5 major complications of fluid collections leading to open wounds, 5 minor wound complications, and 2 wound complications unrelated to drain exit site care. Patient follow-up averaged 10 months. Overall, these data underscore the safety and efficacy associated with a simple approach to the management of closed suction drains.     

Drain clamping in knee arthroplasty, a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine whether repeated clamping of a suction drainage system will result in less external blood loss, blood transfusion and no increase in complications compared to a routine continuous suction drainage system. This was a randomized prospective study on patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty. METHODS: Group A patients' drains were left clamped for all but 5 min (or 100 mL drainage) every 2 h for the first 6 h, then at 12-h and 24-h periods, when the drains were removed. Group B patients had continuous suction drainage. The amount of external blood loss, transfusion requirements and complications were compared between the two groups. The study group comprised 66 patients. RESULTS: The mean external blood loss in the clamped drain group was 296.67 mL (standard deviation 160.28 mL) with a mean drain in situ time of 32 h, significantly less (P < 0.05) than the continuous drain group that had a mean external blood loss of 796 mL (standard deviation 250.34 mL) with a mean drain in situ time of 34 h. There was no difference in the requirements for transfusion between the two groups. CONCLUSION: We conclude that clamping drains intermittently in hybrid total knee arthroplasty results in significantly less external blood loss with no change in morbidity or mortality. This study was a level 1 therapeutic study (i.e. with level of evidence randomized control trial with a significant difference).     

Drains Prevent Seromas Following Lumpectomy with Axillary Dissection

Abstract: Lumpectomy with axillary dissection for breast cancer is usually followed by at least an overnight stay in the hospital for drain management. We eliminated drains and discharged patients following lumpectomy and axillary dissection. A retrospective study of 80 consecutive patients from July 1, 1994, to June 30, 1995, formed the basis for this study. Drains were omitted in 20 consecutive patients discharged to home after undergoing lumpectomy with axillary dissection. This group was compared to the 62 previous patients who had 7 mm closed suction drains until the drainage was less than 25 ml/shift. Seroma formation occurred in 40% of the undrained patients compared to 6% of patients kept overnight in the hospital with a closed-suction drain (p < 0.001). Tumors were smaller and the number of nodes examined by the pathologists was fewer in the patients managed without drains. Patients developing seromas were older, heavier, and shorter than those who did not develop seromas. The use of a drain was related significantly to seroma formation in multivariate analysis.     

Prospective randomized clinical trial of the value of intraperitoneal drainage after pancreatic resection

OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that routine intraperitoneal drainage is not required after pancreatic resection. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: The use of surgically placed intraperitoneal drains has been considered routine after pancreatic resection. Recent studies have suggested that for other major upper abdominal resections, routine postoperative drainage is not required and may be associated with an increased complication rate. METHODS: After informed consent, eligible patients with peripancreatic tumors were randomized during surgery either to have no drains placed or to have closed suction drainage placed in a standardized fashion after pancreatic resection. Clinical, pathologic, and surgical details were recorded. RESULTS: One hundred seventy-nine patients were enrolled in the study, 90 women and 89 men. Mean age was 65.4 years (range 23-87). The pancreas was the tumor site in 142 (79%) patients, with the ampulla (n = 24), duodenum (n = 10), and distal common bile duct (n = 3) accounting for the remainder. A pancreaticoduodenectomy was performed in 139 patients and a distal pancreatectomy in 40 cases. Eighty-eight patients were randomized to have drains placed. Demographic, surgical, and pathologic details were similar between both groups. The overall 30-day death rate was 2% (n = 4). A postoperative complication occurred during the initial admission in 107 patients (59%). There was no significant difference in the number or type of complications between groups. In the drained group, 11 patients (12.5%) developed a pancreatic fistula. Patients with a drain were more likely to develop a significant intraabdominal abscess, collection, or fistula. CONCLUSION: This randomized prospective clinical trial failed to show a reduction in the number of deaths or complications with the addition of surgical intraperitoneal closed suction drainage after pancreatic resection. The data suggest that the presence of drains failed to reduce either the need for interventional radiologic drainage or surgical exploration for intraabdominal sepsis. Based on these results, closed suction drainage should not be considered mandatory or standard after pancreatic resection.     

The influence of the drain suction in knee arthroplasty

PROBLEM: In a prospective randomised clinical study, we investigated the impact of drain-suction on the post-operative blood loss and on both clinical and laboratory parameters after knee replacement operations. PATIENTS AND METHOD: In this study, 116 patients with unilateral implantation of knee replacements were evaluated. The patients' average age was 71.2 years. The operation was carried out mostly without tourniquet application. All patients received two wound drains, 57 with and 59 without suction. The postoperative blood loss as well as clinical and laboratory parameters were assessed. RESULTS: The average peri-operative blood loss amounted to 338 ml. The post-operative blood loss in the group without drain suction was 436 ml and 528 ml in the group with suction. No significant differences could be found concerning the hemoglobin values pre-operatively and on the first and seventh post-operative day, the drainage quantity 12, 24, 36, and 48 hours post-operatively, the wound healing and the CRP. Six patients in the group without and five patients in the group with drain-suction had to receive blood transfusions. DISCUSSION: The application of suction on the drainage system had no significant impact on the post-operative blood loss and the postoperative course. In nine out of ten cases no homologous blood was needed.     

Is a drain tube necessary for minimally invasive lumbar spine fusion surgery?

Purpose

This study aimed to evaluate if closed suction wound drainage is necessary in minimally invasive surgery of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS TLIF).

Methods

This is a prospective randomized clinical study. Fifty-six patients who underwent MIS TLIF were randomly divided into groups A (with a closed suction wound drainage) and B (without tube drainage). Surgical duration, intraoperative blood loss, timing of ambulation, length of hospital stay and complications were recorded. Patients were followed up for an average of 25.3 months. Clinical outcome was assessed using the Oswestry disability index and visual analogue scale (VAS). Fusion rate was classified with the Bridwell grading system, based on plain radiograph.

Results

Both groups had similar patient demographics. The use of drains had no significant influence on perioperative parameters including operative time, estimated blood loss, length of stay and complications. Patients in group B started ambulation 1 day earlier than patients in group A (p < 0.001). Clinical outcomes were comparable between group A and group B.

Conclusion

A drain tube can lead to pain, anxiety and discomfort during the postoperative period. We conclude that drain tubes are not necessary for MIS TLIF. Patients without drains had the benefit of earlier ambulation than those with drains.