One-Week and Six-Month Angiographic Controls of Stent Implantation After Occlusive and Nonocclusive Dissection During Primary Balloon Angioplasty for Acute Myocardial Infarction

We prospectively assessed in 124 consecutive patients by means of 1-week and 6-month follow-up angiograms the rate of reocclusion and restenosis of coronary stenting with Palmaz-Schatz stents after occlusive and nonocclusive dissection during primary balloon angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Patients were further evaluated clinically at 1 year. Stenting was performed on large (>3.2 mm) coronary arteries for suboptimal results (47%), occlusive (8%), or nonocclusive dissections (45%) after balloon angioplasty. Stents were delivered using the bare stent technique and high pressure inflations (>12 atm). All patients received ticlopidine 250 mg (500 mg if weight was >80 kg) and aspirin 100 mg for 1 month. No patient received warfarin. At 1 week, 6 patients died of cardiogenic shock and 2 of right ventricular infarction. One subacute occlusion occurred at day 14. At 6 months, in 95 patients, the angiographic restenosis rate (>50% diameter stenosis) was 19%. One-year clinical follow-up, available in 55 patients, indicated cardiac death in 5, and repeat revascularization in 3. Thus, coronary stenting on large (>3.2 mm) coronary arteries after occlusive and nonocclusive dissection during primary balloon angioplasty for AMI using bare Palmaz-Schatz stents, high pressures, ticlopidine, and aspirin is safe. Our reocclusion and restenosis rates are similar to those of trials on elective stenting in stable patients.

The reocclusion and restenosis rates of coronary Palmaz-Schatz stenting after occlusive and nonocclusive dissection during primary balloon angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction were assessed in 124 consecutive patients by performing 1-week and 6-month angiographic controls. No reocclusion was noted at 1 week, 1 subacute occlusion occurred at day 14, and the angiographic 6-month restenosis rate was 19%.     

Revascularization of chronic coronary artery occlusions using laser debulking followed by stent implantation

OBJECTIVE: Chronic total occlusions are considered unfavourable for percutaneous balloon angioplasty because of the low rate of success and the high rate of restenosis. Stent implantation after recanalization of chronic total occlusions has been shown to reduce restenosis and reocclusion rates compared with balloon angioplasty in recently published randomized trials. However, it is not well known whether laser debulking before stent implantation would improve the benefit of stenting in chronic total occlusions. METHODS AND RESULTS: We analysed procedural and long-term clinical and angiographic follow-up results of 48 patients who underwent laser angioplasty followed by stent implantation for chronic total occlusions. The procedure was completed successfully in 46 patients (95.8%) in whom the lesion was crossed with a guidewire. We implanted 51 stents in 46 chronic total occlusions following laser debulking. During in-hospital follow-up 1 patient (2.1%) had Q wave, and 4 patients (8.7%) had non-Q wave myocardial infarction. Nine patients (19.5%) had repeat angioplasty for restenosis and one (2.1%) underwent coronary bypass operation at 6 months follow-up. Death or Q wave myocardial infarction did not occur during 6-month follow-up. Thirty-nine patients (85%) had angiographic follow-up at 6 months, and stent restenosis was found in 17 (44%) patients. CONCLUSION: These high rates of restenosis and target vessel revascularization in our study suggest that laser debulking before stent implantation does not improve clinical and angiogragic outcomes in chronic total occlusions.     

A Clinical Trial Comparing Primary Stenting of the Infarct-Related Artery With Optimal Primary Angioplasty for Acute Myocardial Infarction: Results From the Florence Randomized Elective Stenting in Acute Coronary Occlusions (FRESCO) Trial

Objectives. This study sought to compare stenting of the primary infarct-related artery (IRA) with optimal primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) with respect to clinical and angiographic outcomes of patients with an acute myocardial infarction.Background. Early and late restenosis or reocclusion of the IRA after successful primary PTCA significantly contributes to increased patient morbidity and mortality. Coronary stenting results in a lower rate of angiographic and clinical restenosis than standard PTCA in patients with angina and with previously untreated, noncomplex lesions.Methods. After successful primary PTCA, 150 patients were randomly assigned to elective stenting or no further intervention. The primary end point of the trial was a composite end point, defined as death, reinfarction or repeat target vessel revascularization as a consequence of recurrent ischemia within 6 months of randomization. The secondary end point was angiographic evidence of restenosis or reocclusion at 6 months after randomization.Results. Stenting of the IRA was successful in all patients randomized to stent treatment. At 6 months, the incidence of the primary end point was 9% in the stent group and 28% in the PTCA group (p = 0.003); the incidence of restenosis or reocclusion was 17% in the stent group and 43% in the PTCA group (p = 0.001).Conclusions. Primary stenting of the IRA, compared with optimal primary angioplasty, results in a lower rate of major adverse events related to recurrent ischemia and a lower rate of angiographically detected restenosis or reocclusion of the IRA.     

Six-month angiographic follow-up after intravascular ultrasound-guided stenting of infarct-related artery: comparison with non-infarct-related artery

BACKGROUND: Compared with balloon angioplasty, stenting has been established as an effective treatment modality to reduce restenosis in patients with acute myocardial infarction. However, the immediate results that predict favorable long-term outcomes in the acute infarct stenting are unknown. Therefore, we evaluated long-term outcomes of stenting for infarct-related artery (IRA) lesions by using intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) compared with that of stenting for non-IRA lesions. METHODS: IVUS-guided coronary stenting was successfully performed in 510 native coronary lesions (105 IRA vs 405 non-IRA). A 6-month follow-up angiogram was performed in 419 (82.2%) lesions: 87 (82.9%) IRA lesions and 332 (82.0%) non-IRA lesions. Coronary stenting on the IRA lesions was successfully performed within 7 to 10 days after onset of infarction in 42 patients and within 12 hours in 45 patients. Results were evaluated by clinical, angiographic, and IVUS methods. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in clinical and angiographic variables between the two groups. IVUS variables including reference vessel area and minimal stent area were also similar between the two groups. There was no significant difference in angiographic restenosis rate between the two groups in cases of minimal stent area > or = 7 mm(2): 12.8% (6 of 47) in IRA versus 19.1% (33 of 173) in non-IRA lesions (P = .315). However, the angiographic restenosis rate in cases of minimal stent area <7 mm(2) was 50% (20 of 40) in IRA lesions versus 31.5% (50 of 159) in non-IRA lesions (P = .028). CONCLUSIONS: Angiographic restenosis is significantly higher in stenting for IRA lesions compared with that for non-IRA lesions in cases of minimal stent area < 7 mm(2).     

Efficacy of heparin-coated stent in early setting of acute myocardial infarction.

Primary stenting has been reported to be superior to balloon percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) for recurrent ischemia, target lesion revascularization, and restenosis. However, concerns about early reocclusion or thrombosis after stenting in the very thrombotic environment of acute myocardial infarction still remain. Therefore, postprocedural short-term heparin or GpII(b)/III(a) receptor blockades has been used. The aim of our study was to evaluate the safety, feasibility, and long-term efficacy of heparin-coated stent in the early setting of AMI without postprocedural heparin or GpII(b)/III(a) receptor blockade infusion. We studied 102 consecutive patients presenting to cardiac catheterization laboratory < or = 6 hr from the onset of chest pain. No patients who were implanted with heparin-coated stents received heparin or GpII(b)/III(a) receptor blockade infusion after the procedures, not even patients who showed an angiographically large thrombus burden before stenting. Patients were evaluated for clinical endpoints at 30 days and 6 months. Coronary angiography was required for all patients at 2 weeks and 6 months after the procedure. Angiographic and procedural successes were 100% and 98%, respectively. Two patients (2%) died of heart failure without evidence of reocclusion of stented vessel during the hospitalization and 4 (4%) additional patients died of refractory heart failure within the first 6 months. Major bleeding complication occurred in one patient (1%). Recurrent myocardial infarction developed in one patient at 4 months. Early angiographic follow up at 2 weeks was performed in 88% of all patients, none of whom showed thrombotic stent occlusion. Six-month angiographic follow-up was completed in 71%(64/91) of eligible patients and binary restenosis was present in 17.2% of stented vessels. Eight(8%) patients underwent repeat PTCA. Cardiac event-free survival rate at 6 months was 86.3%. This study demonstrates that heparin-coated stents are safe in the early setting of acute myocardial infarction and no additional heparin infusion after stenting is necessary, which may reduce bleeding complications. Angiographic restenosis rate compares favorably to the binary restenosis rate from other studies with uncoated stents.     

Long-term follow-up of primary stenting with coil stent in acute myocardial infarction

The authors evaluated clinical and angiographic outcomes for 1 year after primary stenting using coil stent for acute myocardial infarction. Twenty-eight patients underwent primary stenting with coil stent. Follow-up coronary arteriography at 3 months and 1 year was planned in all patients. Procedural success was achieved in 96%. There was no acute or subacute thrombosis. Minimal lumen diameter (MLD) was increased from 0.08 +/- 0.19 to 2.73 +/- 0.49 mm after stenting. MLD had decreased significantly for 3 months (MLD at 3 months: 2.03 +/- 0.86 mm, p = 0.001). On the other hand, MLD did not differ between 3-month; and 1-year follow-up (MLD at 1 year: 2.26 +/- 0.73 mm, p = NS). Only one patient manifested reocclusion at 3-month follow-up. The cumulative restenosis rate and target lesion revascularization rate at 1-year follow-up were 25.9% (7/27) and 11.1% (3/27). Primary stenting using coil stent is safe and feasible in patients with acute myocardial infarction and may improve clinical outcome and decrease restenosis and target lesion revascularization rate.     

Percutaneous revascularization of multivessel coronary disease with systematic stent implantation. Immediate results and clinical follow-up and middle term angiography

The aim of this retrospective study was to assess the immediate and medium-term clinical and angiographic results of multiple angioplasty with stenting in 100 consecutive patients with multivessel coronary artery disease. The mean age of the population was 62 +/- 11 years. Two hundred and eight lesions were treated (2.5 +/- 0.7 per patient) with implantation of 1.14 +/- 0.4 stents per lesion. The angiographic success rate was 98.7%. There were 5 major complications in the hospital period: 3 deaths, including 2 of cardiac causes, one coronary bypass procedure and one Q wave myocardial infarction. During follow-up (17 +/- 6 months), eight patients died (5 of cardiac causes) and secondary revascularisation procedures were required in 22 patients. At 6 months, the angiographic restenosis rate was 32% per lesion, 28.8% per stent and 33 patients had at least one restenosis.     

Comparative trial of stent-like balloon angioplasty versus coronary stenting for acute myocardial infarction.

Primary PTCA has been shown to be superior to any thrombolytic regimen and offers higher reperfusion rates and better coronary flow grades. Its limitations include recurrent ischemia (10%-15%), infarct-related artery reocclusion (5%-10%), angiographic restenosis (35%-50%), and need to perform repeat PTCA or CABG at 6-month follow-up (20%). Thus, the current role of coronary stenting for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is very promising. From December 1995 through January 1997, 335 patients underwent primary angioplasty during the first 12 hr from symptom onset at our institution. We performed a retrospective study comparing the in-hospital and 6-month follow-up outcome of 61 patients who underwent coronary stenting (stent group) against 61 patients with optimal (residual lesion stenosis < 30%) balloon-only primary angioplasty (stent-like group). Patients were routinely treated with aspirin, and ticlopidine was given only to the stent group. In-hospital major adverse cardiac events (MACE) rate was 11.5% without statistical differences between the groups. Cardiac death rate was similar in both groups (4.9 vs. 6.6%; P = 1.0) and only two (3.3%) patients from the stent group and none from the PTCA group had nonfatal myocardial reinfarction. At 6-month follow-up, the rate of recurrent angina was higher in the stent-like group (30.9 vs. 7.1%; P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that only stenting of the infarct-related artery was a borderline independent predictor for MACE (OR = 0; 95% CI = 0-1; P = 0.057). Primary stenting for AMI reduces the rate of recurrent angina or symptoms and MACE at 6-month follow-up.     

Stenting of the Infarct-Related Artery During Complicated Angioplasty in Acute Myocardial Infarction

The aim of this study was to assess safety and efficacy of coronary stenting as a strategy for improving PTCA suboptimal angiographic result. From March 1993 to December 1995, 104 patients underwent PTCA during acute myocardial infarction. Unplanned coronary stenting was required in 66 pts (63.5%). Procedural success was obtained in 64 pts (97%). Two patients had an unsuccessful stenting procedure: one patient for a suboptimal stent deployment and another for LAD reocclusion requiring emergency CABG (1.5%). Palmaz-Schatz stents were used in 60 pts (91%) and AVE micro-stent in 6 pts (9%). During the hospital course, subacute reocclusion of the vessel occurred in 3 pts (4.6%); one patient underwent a successful rePTCA while the other two underwent CABG. Two patients had vascular groin complications requiring surgical repair of the femoral artery. During hospitalization, one patient underwent elective CABG for early residual myocardial ischemia. At seventy-two hours from PTCA, one patient (1.5%) died as a result of intestinal infarct. Six months survival rate was 98.3% for 59 pts discharged alive from our department. Ten pts were symptomatic during the follow-up: One patient underwent PTCA on another vessel and the other underwent CABG for a multivessel disease. CABG was used in one patient who presented residual silent ischemia in multivessel coronary artery disease. At six months, the first group of patients (18 pts) underwent planned coronary angiography: Vessel patency was present in 17 patients. One patient had an asymptomatic reocclusion of the treated vessel. This study shows a good angiographic result obtained with intracoronary stenting during primary or rescue PTCA of the infarct-related artery. It does not appear to increase major in-hospital adverse events and may reduce the need for surgical revascularization, reducing in-hospital mortality rate and favorably affecting LVEF.     

Effect of plaque debulking and stenting on short- and long-term outcomes after revascularization of chronic total occlusions

OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the effect of plaque burden modification (debulking) on the short- and long-term clinical outcomes of patients with a totally occluded native coronary artery undergoing successful stent deployment. BACKGROUND: Although the primary success rate of crossing a chronic totally occluded coronary artery has improved with the development of new interventional devices and guidewires, the rate of acute reocclusion and restenosis remains high. METHODS: The in-hospital and late clinical outcomes of 150 patients who had undergone successful stenting of 176 chronic total occlusions were analyzed. After successful crossing of the lesion, 44 patients with 50 lesions underwent debulking by laser angioplasty, rotational or directional atherectomy followed by stenting, whereas 106 patients with 126 lesions underwent stent implantation without prior debulking. RESULTS: Baseline clinical and angiographic characteristics were similar for the two groups, except for a higher incidence of left anterior descending coronary artery location and longer lesions in the group of patients who underwent debulking prior to stenting. In-hospital mortality, myocardial infarction and repeat angioplasty rates were similar for the two groups. At a mean 14 +/- 8 months follow-up time, there were no deaths in either group, and target lesion revascularization rates were the same (16.3% in the debulking plus stent group vs. 14.4% in the stent alone group, p = NS). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of chronic total native coronary artery occlusions with stent deployment with and without lesion modification (debulking) results in a favorable in-hospital outcome, with relatively low long-term target lesion revascularization rates.     

Coronary stenting in acute myocardial infarction complicated with cardiogenic shock

AIM: To assess immediate and long-term results of urgent coronary stenting in patients with cardiogenic shock. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty three patients (15 men, 8 women mean age 58-/+12 years) with myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock treated with vasopressors and intraaortic balloon pumping (IABP). Culprit lesions were localized in left anterior descending and right coronary arteries in 16 and 7 cases, respectively. Prior to stenting 18 and 5 patients had TIMI grade 0 and 1 flow, respectively. RESULTS: Stents (n=26, Seaquence and Ephesos, length 12-28 mm, diameter 2-3.5 mm) were successfully implanted in all patients after balloon predilation. After stenting TIMI grade 3 flow was achieved in 15 patients, 8 patients had TIMI-2 flow without angiographic signs of dissection or residual stenosis. There were 4 inhospital deaths and 19 patients (83%) were discharged. One angioplasty and 2 coronary artery bypass grafting procedures because of restenosis and reocclusion were successfully performed during first 4 months of follow-up. CONCLUSION: Urgent stenting combined with IABP was effective method of treatment of cardiogenic shock with 83% inhospital survival and 61% freedom from repeat revascularization.     

Rescue coronary stenting with heparin-coated Jostents for failed thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction

The aim of the present study was to assess the procedural safety and in-hospital and long-term effectiveness of heparin-coated Jostents after failed thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction. We prospectively analyzed the acute and long-term clinical and angiographic outcomes of 35 consecutive patients treated with heparin-coated Jostents for thrombolytic failure. Rescue coronary stenting was successful in 34 of 35 patients (97%). Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction flow grade 3 was obtained in 31 patients (88.5%). The only patient with procedural failure died from cardiogenic shock a day after the procedure. One patient (2.8%) underwent an emergency coronary bypass operation because of angiographic evidence of stent thrombosis with re-infarction. During in-hospital follow-up, 2 patients (5.7%) underwent an elective coronary bypass operation after successful stent implantation of the infarct-related artery because of existing severe multivessel coronary artery disease. Minor bleeding complications at the vascular access site occurred in 3 (8.6%) patients. No cerebrovascular or any other major bleeding complication occurred. One patient (2.1%) underwent repeat coronary angioplasty for restenosis and an elective coronary artery bypass operation was performed in one patient (2.8%) during the 294 +/- 150 days follow-up. The rate of target vessel revascularization was 14.3% and the event-free survival rate was 80%. Twenty-six patients (90%) had angiographic follow-up at six months, and stent restenosis was found in 5 (19.2%). This study demonstrates that heparin-coated Jostents are sale, with low in-hospital and long-term mortality rates for the treatment of failed thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction. The angiographic restenosis and target vessel revascularization rates of this registry are also acceptable.     

Immediate and Remote Results of Endovascular Recanalization of Chronic Coronary Artery Occlusions

We compared early and long-term follow-up results of balloon angioplasty and stenting of chronic coronary occlusions. The initial success rate was 75% (82 of 109 patients). Proportion of patients free of angina was 57 and 69% after successful balloon angioplasty and stenting, respectively. Stenting of coronary occlusions yielded better immediate angiographic results than did balloon angioplasty: residual stenosis and minimal diameter of artery after stenting were 13.5-12.4% and 2.7-0.2 mm, respectively; those after balloon angioplasty were 23.2-15.6% and 2.3-0.2 mm, p<0,05, respectively. Four-year clinical outcome was better in stenting than in angioplasty group: free of angina were 52 and 22% of patients in stenting and angioplasty group, respectively (p<0,05). There was no difference at follow-up between two groups in the rate of myocardial infarction, death, repeat revascularization. Repeat coronary angiography was performed after 38-24 months in 44% of patients. The rate of 'late' restenosis was 32% in stenting and 73% in balloon angioplasty group (p<0,05); mean stenosis and minimal diameter of artery after stenting were 43.5-12.4% and 1.7-0.6 mm, respectively; those after balloon angioplasty were 67.5-15.6% and 0.72+0.5 mm, respectively (p<0,05).     

Direct coronary stent implantation does not reduce the incidence of in-stent restenosis or major adverse cardiac events: six month results of a randomized trial.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare the long-term angiographic, clinical and economic outcome of direct stenting vs stenting after balloon predilatation. PATIENT POPULATION AND METHODS: Four hundred patients with coronary stenoses in a single native vessel were randomized to direct stenting vs stenting after predilatation. A major adverse cardiac and cerebral event (MACCE) was defined as death, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, target restenosis, repeat target- and non-target vessel-related percutaneous coronary intervention, target lesion revascularization, coronary artery bypass surgery and stroke. RESULTS: Stents were successfully implanted in 98.3% of patients randomized to direct stenting vs 97.8% randomized to stenting preceded by predilatation. The primary success rate of direct stenting was 88.3%, vs 97.8% for stenting preceded by balloon dilatation (P=0.01). The angiographic follow-up at 6 months included 333 of the 400 patients (83%). The binary in-stent restenosis rate was 23.1% of 163 patients randomized to direct stenting vs 18.8% of 166 patients randomized to balloon predilatation (P=0.32). By 185+/-25 days, MACCE had occurred in 31 of 200 (15.5%) patients randomized to direct stenting, vs 33 of 200 (16.5%) randomized to predilatation (P=0.89). At 6 months, costs associated with the direct stenting strategy (Euros 3222/patient) were similar to those associated with predilatation (Euros 3428/patient, P=0.43). However, procedural costs were significantly lower. It is noteworthy that, on multivariate analysis, a baseline C-reactive protein level >10 mg l(-1)was a predictor of restenosis (odds ratio: 2.10, P=0.025) as well as of MACCE (odds ratio: 1.94, P=0.045). CONCLUSIONS: Compared to stenting preceded by balloon predilatation, direct stenting was associated with similar 6-month restenosis and MACCE rates. Procedural, but not overall 6-month costs, were reduced by direct stenting. An increased baseline CRP level was an independent predictor of adverse long-term outcome after coronary stent implantation.     

In-Hospital Results of the Wiktor Stent in Acute Myocardial Infarction

Background: Coronary angioplasty has been established as the preferred method of treatment for patients with acute myocardial infarction when they are admitted to a hospital with skilled interventional cardiologists and personnel well-trained in cardiac catheterization techniques. Nevertheless, the possibilities of artery reocclusion, recurrent ischemia, and high rates of late restenosis have made some investigators believe that coronary stenting could be a better mechanical reperfusion technique than conventional balloon angioplasty. Methods: We reviewed the in-hospital results of patients who received a Wiktor coronary stent implant during primary or rescue angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction within 6 hours of either the onset of pain or the recurrence of symptoms after thrombolytic administration. We excluded patients in shock and those whose symptoms were produced by an acute occlusion after an angioplasty procedure. Quantitative coronary analysis of the lesions treated were performed by automatic border detection using the on-line DCI system by Phillips or off-line CMS system by Medis. Results: Thirty-three patients, aged 59 ± 13 years (79% male), received one or more coronary stents (41 stents were implanted) for treatment of acute myocardial infarction during primary angioplasty (30) or rescue angioplasty (3) after the onset of symptoms. Twenty-nine of the patients were in Killip Class I (patients in shock were excluded). The infarct related artery was the left anterior descending in 19 patients (58%), the right coronary artery in 12 (36%), and the left circumflex in 2 (6%). Twenty-seven patients (82%) had TIMI 0-1 flow on the initial angiography. After stent implantation 100% of the patients had TIMI III (85%) or TIMI II (15%) flow. The minimal luminal diameter of the infarct related artery increased from 0.22 ± 0.38 mm before the procedure to 2.99 ± 0.48 mm after stem implantation. Most of the patients (27 [84%]) received antiaggregation therapy-after the procedure. There was no mortality or reinfarction, although one patient had an embolic stroke. There were no cases of acute or subacute thrombosis of the stent. Conclusion: Use of the Wiktor stent during angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction is followed by immediate angiographic and in-hospital clinical results comparable to results obtained with other types of stent. This stent is particularly useful in curved lesions and those with an important collateral branch arising from the lesion. If the angiographic result is optimal, the patient can be managed with antiaggregant therapy after stent implantation.     

The value of stress single-photon emission computed tomography imaging performed routinely at 6 months in asymptomatic patients for predicting angiographic restenosis after successful direct percutaneous intervention for acute ST elevation myocardial infarction

AIMS: The authors tested the value of stress single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) imaging performed systematically for detecting angiographic restenosis in asymptomatic patients who underwent direct percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Angiographic restenosis of the infarct-related artery after direct PCI for STEMI is often silent and the strategy for follow-up evaluation of asymptomatic patients remains debated. METHODS: A total of 149 patients successfully treated by direct PCI (96% stenting) for STEMI with no symptoms during the follow-up systematically underwent both rest thallium 201/stress Tc 99m setamibi myocardial perfusion imaging and coronary angiogram at 6 months. Patients were followed up for 2.5+/-0.5 years after 6 months control for cardiac events. RESULTS: In the 149 patients, the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values and accuracy of SPECT imaging were 48, 61, 35, 72 and 57%, respectively, for detecting binary angiographic restenosis defined as > or =50% diameter stenosis. Whether stress testing was maximal or performed after withheld anti-ischemic drugs did not improve the results. Reversible ischemia at SPECT in the infarct territory did not predict long-term cardiac events. CONCLUSION: These data suggest a poor correlation between stress SPECT imaging and angiographic restenosis at 6 months in patients treated by direct PCI for STEMI who remain asymptomatic at follow-up. The long-term clinical prognostic value of SPECT reversible ischemia in the infarct territory appears also limited in this peculiar subset of patients. These findings should be taken into account in the strategy of the clinical follow-up of this population.     

Multiple stent implantation in single coronary arteries: Acute results and six-month angiographic follow-up

A total of 147 stents were implanted (in overlapping manner in 76% of vessels) in a single coronary artery in 59 patients (60 vessels, 97 lesions, 2.45 stents/vessel) over a period of 18 mo using high pressure stent deployment without ultrasound guidance. The indications for stenting were suboptimal percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) result (45%), primary prevention of restenosis (44%), acute closure (10%), and restenosis after plain balloon angioplasty (1%). One patient required emergency coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) (extensive dissection), and one required early intervention with plain balloon angioplasty and intracoronary urokinase for stent thrombosis. There were no deaths. Thirteen patients had recurrence of angina within 6 mo and angiograms were performed in all. These showed intrastent restenosis in nine (all had successful repeat plain balloon angioplasty), development of new disease in other vessels along with restenosis close to the stent in the target vessel in one (underwent elective CABG) and normal angiograms with widely patent stents in three. Forty-five patients (77%) remained free of recurrent angina and 25 of these had follow-up angiograms (56%) at a mean of 172 days, two showing restenosis. Thus, the restenosis rate per patient in the symptomatic group (angiographic follow-up in 100%) was 77% and in the asymptomatic group (angiographic follow-up in 56%) was 8%. The restenosis rate in the subgroup with bailout stenting (n = 6) was 20% (angiographic follow-up in 83%). The overall restenosis rate per patient was 32% (overall angiographic follow-up in 66%). During the 6-mo follow-up period, one patient underwent elective CABG (1.7%), one sustained a non-Q myocardial infarction (1.7%), nine had repeat PTCA to the target vessel (15.5%), and there were no deaths. The event-free survival rate was 77%. Multiple stent implantation aided by high pressure stent deployment without ultrasound guidance and with adjunctive optimal antiplatelet therapy without oral anticoagulation seems to be a useful and effective revascularisation strategy to deal with long lesions and acute dissections with a high procedural success rate. The restenosis rate is acceptable and is not appreciably high as reported in previous studies from the “warfarin era.” Cathet. Cardiovasc. Diagn. 42:158–165, 1997. © 1997 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock on admission.

AIM: To evaluate primary angioplasty results for the treatment of acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock on admission. POPULATION AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 11 consecutive patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock (defined as systolic blood pressure below 80 mmHg and signs of hypoperfusion, despite volume expanders and/or vasopressors infusion) treated with primary angioplasty. Clinical characteristics, angiographic data, hospital outcome and follow-up were analysed. RESULTS: There were ten males (90.9%) with a mean age of 66 years. Eight patients had anterior wall myocardial infarction and three patients had inferior wall myocardial infarction, two of which with extension to the right ventricle. The mean time between symptom onset and angioplasty was 3.5 hours. Three patients had left main coronary artery occlusion; three patients had single vessel disease and five patients had multivessel disease. The angiographic success rate (open infarct-related artery and TIMI III flow) was 90.9% (ten patients). Stent implantation was performed in five patients. Abciximab was given in five patients. In-hospital mortality rate was 36.4% (four patients). The surviving patients had a mean ejection fraction of 43.1% on discharge. In a mean follow-up of 16.2 months, one patient had coronary artery bypass graft and one had stroke. CONCLUSION: Based on published data, our experience with this short series of cases shows that primary angiography should be regarded as a positive option for the treatment of acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock.     

Stent placement for ostial left anterior descending coronary artery stenosis: acute and long-term (2-year) results.

This study was performed to assess the acute and long-term results of elective stenting for the treatment of ostial left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) stenosis. One hundred and eleven consecutive patients with ostial LAD stenting were included for this study. Follow-up angiography was performed at 6 months and clinical evaluation at regular intervals after stenting. Procedural success rate was 97.3%. Four patients developed non-Q myocardial infarction and one patient underwent emergency bypass surgery due to a large dissection after stenting. Angiographic restenosis rate was 26.1% (18/69), and target lesion revascularization rate 11.7%. The final luminal diameter after stenting was the only predictor of angiographic restenosis. Clinical follow-up was obtained in all patients at 21.5 +/- 16.0 months. Two patients died during the follow-up. Event-free survival rate was 84.6 +/- 3.8%. In conclusions, stenting with or without debulking atherectomy may be considered as an acceptable therapeutic option for the treatment of ostial LAD stenosis.     

Systematic treatment of acute myocardial infarction with primary angioplasty. Early clinical and angiographic results and after 6 months

Starting in 1995, at our institution all patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) who gave informed consent were treated by primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) without limitations in entry criteria. This report presents early and six-month clinical and angiographic results of the 720 patients (77% male, median age 64 years) treated by direct PTCA between January 1, 1995 and July 31, 1998. On admission, 33% of patients were in Killip class > 1, and 101 patients (14%) were in early cardiogenic shock. Optimal acute angiographic success (TIMI grade 3 flow with residual stenosis < 30%) was achieved in 683 patients (95%). Primary or unplanned stenting of infarct related artery (IRA) for a suboptimal or poor angiographic result after primary PTCA was performed in 454 patients (63%). The mean time from hospital arrival to recanalization was 62 +/- 28 min. At 30 days, the mortality rate was 4.9% (1.8% in Killip class < 4 patients and 24% in patients with cardiogenic shock). The reinfarction rate was 1.2%. At 30 days, coronary angiography showed restenosis or reocclusion of the IRA in 55 patients (8.9%). During the six-month follow-up (30-180 days), there were 11 deaths (1.5%) and 2 non-fatal reinfarctions (0.3%). At six months, the IRA patency rate was 95%, while the mean ejection fraction improvement in 422 patients with paired ventriculograms was 7%. Recurrent ischemia occurred in 144 patients (20%) and resulted in 7 deaths, 11 non-fatal reinfarctions and 126 repeat targeted vessel revascularization. CONCLUSIONS: The major finding of our experience is that direct coronary angioplasty may result in excellent early and late outcome in a population without limitations in entry criteria. The low mortality and the few recurrent myocardial ischemic events are connected with the high patency rate at 6 months. The extensive use of stents improves the angiographic results and the clinical outcome.