Effects of dizocilpine [(+)-MK-801] on the expression of associative and non-associative sensitization to <Emphasis Type="SmallCaps">d</Emphasis>-amphetamine

Blockade of glutamate receptors of the NMDA type inhibits the sensitization to psychostimulant drugs, such as amphetamine, that occurs after repeated administration. Both associative (conditioning) and non-associative (pseudo-conditioning) mechanisms may contribute to sensitization phenomena. The aim of the present study was, thus, to determine which type of sensitization is influenced by blockade of NMDA-type receptors by examining the expression (manifestation) of sensitization. Locomotor activity was assessed and, in some experiments, extracellular dopamine in the nucleus accumbens was also assessed using in vivo microdialysis in non-anaesthetized, almost freely moving rats. Male albino Wistar rats of 225–250 g were given 1 mg/kg i.p. d-amphetamine every 2nd day for 7 days and with saline on the other days. Half the rats were exposed to d-amphetamine in the presence of conditioning stimuli (test cage, auditory and olfactory stimulus) and to saline in the home cage in absence of these stimuli, the other half were treated with saline and exposed to the conditioning stimuli and were placed into their home cages (without conditioning stimuli) after treatment with d-amphetamine. Ten days after the end of this treatment, both groups were exposed to the conditioning stimuli and half of each group were pretreated with dizocilpine [(+)-MK-801, 0.1 mg/kg i.p.], a blocker of NMDA receptors, 30 min before administration of 1 mg/kg d-amphetamine.(+)-MK-801 reduced the locomotor activity in rats sensitized associatively, but not in those sensitized non-associatively. It had no significant effect on spontaneous locomotor activity or that induced by acute administration of 1 mg/kg d-amphetamine. Similarly, (+)-MK-801 inhibited the increase in extracellular dopamine in the nucleus accumbens induced by the test dose of d-amphetamine in rats sensitized associatively but not non-associatively. The results suggest that the expression of both types of sensitization to d-amphetamine are dependent on glutamatergic NMDA mechanisms, although in different ways. Inhibition of sensitization, in particular of the associative type, might be of therapeutic value in drug dependence.     

Post-weaning housing conditions influence the behavioural effects of cocaine and d-amphetamine

Post-weaning social isolation can induce profound and long lasting effects on an animal’s behaviour. The present study investigated the influence of post-weaning housing conditions on the sensitivity of rats to the behavioural effects of d-amphetamine and cocaine. The locomotor stimulant effects of both drugs were compared following acute and chronic administration. The influence of post-weaning housing conditions on the effects of d-amphetamine and cocaine on responding for food and for a conditioned reinforcer were also examined. Isolated rats showed enhanced locomotor activity on exposure to a novel environment. This difference was further exaggerated following administration of d-amphetamine (0.5 mg/kg) and cocaine (5 mg/kg). Isolated, but not enriched, rats exhibited sensitisation to the locomotor activating effects of repeated administration of a dose of 0.5 mg/kg d-amphetamine, whilst both groups sensitised equally to a dose of 1.0 mg/kg d-amphetamine. Rearing conditions did not affect sensitisation to cocaine (5, 10 mg/kg). Isolated rats exhibited a higher rate of responding for a conditioned stimulus and for food on a progressive ratio schedule of reinforcement, both of which were enhanced to a greater extent in isolates following administration of cocaine (5 mg/kg) and d-amphetamine (0.5 mg/kg). These results suggest that isolation rearing induces an enhancement in sensitivity to both the locomotor stimulant and reinforcing properties of amphetamine and cocaine. Received: 12 June 1996 / Final version: 17 October 1996     

Quantitative assessment of the microstructure of rat behavior: II. Distinctive effects of dopamine releasers and uptake inhibitors

The effects of four indirect dopamine agonists,d-amphetamine (0.25–4.0 mg/kg), cocaine (2.5–40.0 mg/kg), GBR 12909 (10.0–30.0 mg/kg), and nomifensine (5.0–20.0 mg/kg), on the behavioral organization of movements in an unconditioned motor paradigm were investigated in rats. The extended scaling hypothesis using the fluctuation spectrum of local spatial scaling exponents was used to quantify the geometrical characteristics of movements. The results reveal a qualitatively similar disruption of behavioral organization by lower doses of these drugs. Specifically, rats treated withd-amphetamine (<2.0 mg/kg), cocaine (<20.0 mg/kg), GBR 12909 (<20.0 mg/kg), or nomifensine (<10.0 mg/kg) exhibited a reduced range in the fluctuation spectrum, reflecting a predominance of meandering movements with local spatial scaling exponents between 1.3 and 1.7. This reduction was accompanied dynamically by a reduced predictability of movement sequences as measured by the dynamical entropy,h. By contrast, higher doses of these drugs produced distinctly different changes in behavioral organization. In particular, 4.0 mg/kgd-amphetamine and 40.0 mg/kg cocaine increased the fluctuation range, reflecting relative increases in both straight and circumscribed movements that are interpreted as a combination of spatially extended and local perseveration. In contrast, high doses of 30.0 mg/kg GBR 12909 and 20.0 mg/kg nomifensine induced only local perseveration. High doses ofd-amphetamine, cocaine, GBR 12909 and nomifensine reduced the dynamical entropy,h, indicating an increased predictability of the movement sequences. These results suggest that the generic behavioral change induced by low doses of dopamine agonists is characterized by a reduced variety of path patterns coupled with an increased variability in sequential movement sequences. The differential effects of higher doses of these drugs may be due to their influences on other neurotransmitter systems or differential affinities for different dopamine subsystems.     

Discriminative stimulus and reinforcing effects of <Emphasis Type="Italic">p</Emphasis>-fluoro-<Emphasis Type="SmallCaps">l</Emphasis>-deprenyl in monkeys

Rationale para-Fluoro-l-deprenyl (Fludepryl), a halogenated derivative of l-deprenyl, shares structural similarities with amphetamine and may have potential as a medication for psychostimulant abuse. Objectives p-Fluoro-l-deprenyl was evaluated for psychomotor stimulant, discriminative stimulus, and reinforcing effects in squirrel monkeys. Methods One group of monkeys was trained under a ten-response fixed-ratio (FR10) schedule of stimulus termination to discriminate between methamphetamine (0.32 mg/kg, i.m.) and saline. Other monkeys were trained to self-administer i.v. cocaine under either a simple FR10 schedule or a second-order fixed-interval 5-min schedule with FR10 components. Results Full generalization to the methamphetamine-training stimulus was produced by an i.m. dose of 10.0 mg/kg p-fluoro-l-deprenyl. l-Deprenyl and the metabolites of p-fluoro-l-deprenyl, p-fluoro-l-amphetamine, and p-fluoro-l-methylamphetamine were more potent, producing full generalization at doses of 1.0–3.2 mg/kg. Under the FR10 schedule of drug injection, persistent self-administration behavior was maintained by i.v. cocaine injections but not by injections of vehicle or injection doses of p-fluoro-l-deprenyl up to 1.0 mg/kg. However, p-fluoro-l-deprenyl did maintain moderate levels of i.v. self-administration responding under the second-order schedule of drug injection. Peak response rates maintained by 0.1-mg/kg injections of p-fluoro-l-deprenyl were significantly greater than those associated with saline substitution, yet significantly lower than those maintained by cocaine or d-amphetamine. Conclusions p-Fluoro-l-deprenyl has methamphetamine-like discriminative-stimulus properties in squirrel monkeys that appear at higher doses than for its parent compound, l-deprenyl. It also appears to function as a relatively limited reinforcer of intravenous self-administration behavior in monkeys trained to self-administer i.v. cocaine.     

<Emphasis Type="Italic">d</Emphasis>-Amphetamine responses in catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) disrupted mice

Rationale We have earlier found that 1) COMT inhibitors did not enhance amphetamine-induced dopamine efflux into striatal extracellular, that 2) they did not increase dopamine levels in striatal tissue and that 3) they did not potentiate amphetamine-induced turning behavior of hemiparkinsonian rats. Further, when COMT knockout mice were challenged with l-dopa or a dopamine transporter (DAT) inhibitor, an accumulation of dopamine occurred and the neurochemical and locomotor effects of l-dopa and GBR 12909 were modified accordingly.Objective Since DAT inhibitors and amphetamine apparently have different mechanisms of action, we were interested to see how COMT knockout mice would react to d-amphetamine treatment.Methods We measured the effects of d-amphetamine on locomotor activity and on the levels of catecholamines and their metabolites in striatal microdialysis fluid and in striatal, hypothalamic and cortical brain regions of COMT gene disrupted mice. Striatal dopamine receptor binding was also determined.Results After d-amphetamine administration, the DOPAC content in homozygous mice was 3-fold in the striatum, 17- to 18-fold in the cortex and 7- to 8-fold in the hypothalamus higher than in wild-type control mice, and there were no indications of genotype×sex interactions. However, the lack of COMT did not potentiate d-amphetamine-induced dopamine levels in brain tissue or in striatal extracellular fluid. d-Amphetamine-induced (10 mg/kg) hyperlocomotion was less suppressed in male COMT knockout mice than in their wild-type counterparts. Striatal dopamine D₁ and D₂ receptor levels in male mice were not altered by COMT gene disruption.Conclusions Changes in COMT activity modulates dopamine metabolism but the behavioral effects of d-amphetamine in male mice only to a small extent, and this action does not seem to depend on the actual extracellular dopamine concentration. Nor is it mediated through compensatory changes in dopamine D₁ and D₂ receptor levels. In dopaminergic neurons, the contribution of intracellular COMT remains secondary in conditions when dopamine is released by d-amphetamine.     

Studies on electroencephalogram (EEG) in rats suggest that moderate doses of cocaine ord-amphetamine activate D1 rather than D2 receptors

The effects of cocaine andd-amphetamine, two psychomotor stimulant drugs with pronounced addictive properties, on the electroencephalogram (EEG) of rats were studied by telemetric recordings from the skull in non-anesthetized, freely moving rats. The electrocorticogram (ECoG) was recorded. Both cocaine (10 mg/kg IP) andd-amphetamine (0.4 mg/kg IP) produced a desynchronization, characterized by a general lowering in power in all of the frequency bands. These effects of both drugs were mimicked by the selective agonist at D₁ receptors SK&F 38393 (3 mg/kg SC) and were reversed by the antagonist at D₁ receptors SCH 23390 (0.2 mg/kg IP) but not influenced by haloperidol (0.1 mg/kg IP) in a dose which is likely to block D₂ rather than D₁ receptors. These doses of cocaine ord-amphetamine did not produce stereotyped behaviour and slight, if any, increases in locomotor activity only. Large doses of cocaine (30 mg/kg IP) ord-amphetamine (4 mg/kg IP) produced stereotyped behaviour and alterations in EEG which are, based on previous own studies, characteristic for additional stimulation of D₂ receptors. This was manifest in a selective increase in power of the alpha-1 band. A similar effect was also produced by the agonist both at D₁ and D₂ receptors, apomorphine (0.5 mg/kg SC). These results suggest that moderate, but probably rewarding doses of cocaine ord-amphetamine mainly activate D₁ dopamine receptors. This activation might be relevant for the rewarding properties of these drugs.     

Investigation of the effects of lamotrigine and clozapine in improving reversal-learning impairments induced by acute phencyclidine and <Emphasis Type="SmallCaps">d</Emphasis>-amphetamine in the rat

Rationale Phencyclidine (PCP), a glutamate/N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist, has been shown to induce a range of symptoms similar to those of patients with schizophrenia, while d-amphetamine induces predominantly positive symptoms. Previous studies in our laboratory have shown that PCP can selectively impair the performance of an operant reversal-learning task in the rat. Furthermore, we found that the novel antipsychotic ziprasidone, but not the classical antipsychotic haloperidol, could prevent the PCP-induced deficit.Objectives The aim of the present study was to validate the model further using the atypical antipsychotic clozapine and then to investigate the effects of lamotrigine, a broad-spectrum anticonvulsant that is known to reduce glutamate release in vitro and is able to prevent ketamine-induced psychotic symptoms in healthy human volunteers. A further aim was to compare effects of PCP and d-amphetamine in the test and investigate the effects of the typical antipsychotic haloperidol against the latter.Methods Female hooded-Lister rats were food deprived and trained to respond for food in a reversal-learning paradigm.Results PCP at 1.5 mg/kg and 2.0 mg/kg and d-amphetamine at 0.5 mg/kg significantly and selectively impaired performance in the reversal phase of the task. The cognitive deficit induced by 1.5 mg/kg PCP was attenuated by prior administration of lamotrigine (20 mg/kg and 30 mg/kg) or clozapine (5 mg/kg), but not haloperidol (0.05 mg/kg). In direct contrast, haloperidol (0.05 mg/kg), but not lamotrigine (25 mg/kg) or clozapine (5 mg/kg), prevented a similar cognitive impairment produced by d-amphetamine (0.5 mg/kg).Conclusions Our findings provide further data to support the use of PCP-induced disruption of reversal learning in rodents to investigate novel antipsychotic drugs. The results also provide evidence for different mechanisms of PCP and d-amphetamine-induced disruption of performance in the test, and their different sensitivities to typical and atypical antipsychotic drugs.     

Differential interaction of GBR 12909, a dopamine uptake inhibitor, with cocaine and methamphetamine in rats discriminating cocaine

RATIONALE: Inhibitors of neuronal dopamine uptake, such as GBR 12909, decrease IV cocaine self-administration by laboratory animals and have been proposed as potential therapeutic agents for abuse of psychomotor stimulant drugs. OBJECTIVES: This study was performed to determine how GBR 12909 alters the discriminative stimulus effects of methamphetamine and cocaine. METHODS: Rats were trained to discriminate between IP injections of 10 mg/kg cocaine and saline and were tested for stimulus generalization to cocaine, GBR 12909, and methamphetamine. Based upon the ED50 of the individual drugs, combinations of GBR 12909 and either cocaine or methamphetamine were tested that comprised a) 1 part GBR 12909 and 2 parts cocaine or methamphetamine, or b) 2 parts GBR 12909 and 1 part cocaine or methamphetamine. RESULTS: GBR 12909 and cocaine were equipotent and 30-fold less potent than methamphetamine in producing cocaine-like discriminative effects. GBR 12909 and cocaine produced cocaine-like discriminative effects synergistically in the ratio of 1 part GBR 12909:2 parts cocaine (0.16+0.32 to 1.92+ 3.87 mg/kg) and nearly synergistically in the ratio of 2 parts GBR 12909:1 part cocaine (0.32+0.16 to 3.92+ 1.91 mg/kg). GBR 12909 and methamphetamine (0.32+0.02 to 3.20+0.22 mg/kg or 0.65+0.01 to 6.53+0.1 mg/kg) were simply additive in both sets of fixed-ratio dose combinations. CONCLUSIONS: The synergy of GBR 12909 and cocaine and the additivity of GBR 12909 and methamphetamine run counter to the presumed mechanisms of action of these drugs at dopamine nerve terminals, which might have implications for the use of GBR 12909 in the treatment of addiction to cocaine or amphetamines.     

Interaction between d-amphetamine and ethanol with respect to locomotion,stereotypies, ethanol sleeping time,and the kinetics of drug elimination

The interaction between d-amphetamine and ethanol with respect to locomotor activity, stereotyped behavior, and sleeping time was investigated in rats. Ethanol 0.8 g/kg i.p. enhanced and prolonged locomotor activity produced by d-amphetamine 1 mg/kg s.c. The increased motility after 5 mg/kg d-amphetamine was not influenced by alcohol 0.8 g/kg i.p. or 3.2 g/kg orally, but slightly protracted. Stereotyped head and paw movements as well as stereotyped licking, were distinctly strengthened and protracted by 3.2 g/kg ethanol orally. The modified d-amphetamine motility and stereotypies can be explained by alcohol-induced prolongation of the life of d-amphetamine. The effect is produced by alcohol's inhibition d-amphetamine p-hydroxylation in rat liver. After 3.2 g/kg ethanol i.p., the sleeping time of male rats amounted to 153 min. Simultaneous administration of 5 mg/kg d-amphetamine s.c. reduced the sleeping time to 84 min. This is obviously based on a central antagonism.     

Differences between (+)- and (−)-amphetamine in effects on locomotor activity and l-dopa potentiating action in mice

Summary The l-Dopa-potentiating effects of the two optical isomers of amphetamine, as well as the effects of their own, were investigated in mice, using locomotor activity as test parameter. The study was performed in three steps. First, the time-course were studied for the effects of (+)- and (–)-amphetamine and l-Dopa. Second, dose-response relationships were established for the amphetamine enantiomers. Third, the l-Dopa-potentiating effects, of a few, selected doses of the amphetamine isomers were investigated by establishing dose-response curves for l-Dopa with and without the amphetamines. All animals given l-Dopa were pretreated with an inhibitor of extracerebral aromatic amino acid decarboyxlase. (+)-Amphetamine, 0.5–8 mg/kg, caused a dose-dependent stimulation of locomotoractivity, whereas (–)-amphetamine, 1–4 mg/kg, caused a dose-dependent depression. Doses higher than 8 mg/kg of the laevo-isomer caused stimulation of the activity. (+)-Amphetamine, 0.25 mg/kg, and (–)-amphetamine, 0.5 mg/kg, i.e. doses without any effect on locomotor activity of their own, caused virtually the same shift to the left of the dose-response curve for l-Dopa. (–)-Amphetamine, 4 mg/kg which per se caused depression of locomotor activity, caused a marked potentiation of the l-Dopa-induced stimulation of motor activity. Thus, there does not exist a close correlation between the l-Dopa-potentiating action of the amphetamines and their stimulating properties per se.     

On the role of noradrenaline in psychostimulant-induced psychomotor activity and sensitization

Rationale Psychostimulant drugs exert their behavioral effects primarily through enhancement of monoaminergic neurotransmission. Augmented dopamine activity is thought to play a critical role in the psychomotor stimulant effects of amphetamine and cocaine, as well as in the development of long-term behavioral sensitization evoked by repeated exposure to amphetamine. However, despite the fact that brain dopamine and noradrenaline systems are closely interconnected, the extent to which noradrenergic transmission contributes to these behavioral effects of psychostimulants is a relatively unexplored issue. Objectives By inhibiting noradrenergic neurotransmission with the α₂-adrenoceptor agonist clonidine, the α₁-antagonist prazosin and the β-antagonist propranolol, we investigated the involvement of noradrenaline neurotransmission in the psychomotor stimulant and long-term sensitizing effects of d-amphetamine and cocaine in rats. Methods Clonidine (0.003–0.1 mg/kg), prazosin (0.1–3.0 mg/kg) and propranolol (1.0–3.0 mg/kg) were administered prior to d-amphetamine (1.0 mg/kg), cocaine (15 mg/kg) or apomorphine (1.0 mg/kg) and psychomotor activity was measured. In separate studies, clonidine (0.03 mg/kg), prazosin (1.0 mg/kg) or propranolol (3.0 mg/kg) were co-administered with d-amphetamine (2.5 mg/kg) or cocaine (30 mg/kg) for 5 days, and locomotor sensitization was assessed 3 weeks post-treatment. Results The psychomotor stimulant effect of d-amphetamine, but not that of cocaine or apomorphine, was dose-dependently inhibited by clonidine and prazosin, and enhanced by propranolol. Clonidine, prazosin, and propranolol did not influence the induction of sensitization by amphetamine or cocaine. Conclusions Enhancement of synaptic noradrenaline concentrations contributes to the psychomotor stimulant effect of d-amphetamine, but not cocaine or apomorphine. In addition, noradrenergic neurotransmission is not critically involved in the induction of psychostimulant sensitization.     

Effects of dopamine D1 and D2 receptor blockade on MK-801-induced hyperlocomotion in rats

Blocking glutamatergic transmission at the N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptor complex with MK-801 (0.15–0.5 mg/kg, IP) was found to induce a robust, dose-dependent increase in locomotor activity. This behavioural activation was similar in intensity to that observed afterd-amphetamine (1 mg/kg, SC). The locomotor stimulation induced by MK-801 at 0.3 mg/kg was significantly inhibited by the D₂ dopamine receptor antagonist raclopride (0.1–0.3 mg/kg, SC) and by the D₁ receptor antagonist SCH 23390 (0.04 mg/kg, SC). The locomotor activity induced by a higher dose of MK-801 (0.5 mg/kg) was reduced by higher doses of raclopride or SCH 23390 administered alone (0.3 and 0.08 mg/kg, respectively), and was inhibited by simultaneous administration of ineffective doses. Raclopride significantly reducedd-amphetamine-induced locomotor activity at a dose (0.2 mg/kg) that also blocked the effects of a low dose of MK-801. In contrast, SCH 23390 blocked the effects ofd-amphetamine at a dose (i.e. 0.01 mg/kg) lower than that needed to block MK-801. These results suggest that the dopaminergic system may in part mediate the locomotor effects induced by the NMDA antagonist, MK-801, in rats. However, the locomotor activity induced by MK-801 appears to be less sensitive to dopaminergic receptor blockade than that induced byd-amphetamine, suggesting that the underlying mechanisms, although similar, are not identical.     

Dissociating effects of cocaine and <Emphasis Type="Italic">d</Emphasis>-amphetamine on dopamine and serotonin in the perirhinal,entorhinal, and prefrontal cortex of freely moving rats

Rationale Neuroimaging studies with humans showed widespread activation of the cortex in response to psychostimulant drugs. However, the neurochemical nature of these brain activities is not characterized. Objective The aim of the present study was to investigate the effects of cocaine and d-amphetamine on dopamine (DA) and serotonin (5-HT) in cortical areas of the hippocampal network in comparison to the prefrontal cortex (PFC). Materials and methods We conducted in vivo microdialysis experiments in behaving rats measuring DA and 5-HT in the perirhinal cortex (PRC), entorhinal cortex (EC), and PFC, after application of cocaine (0, 5, 10, 20 mg/kg; i.p.) or d-amphetamine (0, 0.5, 1.0, 2.5 mg/kg; i.p.). Results Cocaine and d-amphetamine dose-dependently increased DA and 5-HT levels in the PRC, EC, and PFC. A predominant DA response to d-amphetamine was only found in the PFC, but not in the PRC and EC. Cocaine increased DA and 5-HT to an equal extent in the PFC and PRC but induced a predominant 5-HT response in the EC. When comparing the neurochemical responses between the drugs at an equal level of behavioral activation, cocaine was more potent than d-amphetamine in increasing 5-HT in the PFC, while no differences were found in the PRC or EC or in the DA responses in all three cortical areas. Conclusions We conclude that cocaine and d-amphetamine increase DA and 5-HT levels in PRC and EC largely to the same extent as in the PFC.     

Effect of daily dosing duration of direct and indirect dopamine receptor agonists: cocaine cross-tolerance following chronic regimens.

One therapeutic paradigm for cocaine abuse is a 24-h 'agonist' treatment which reduces reinforcing effects in a manner similar to the methadone maintenance model for heroin. However, 24-h dosing of dopamine (DA) agonists may induce side effects of insomnia and psychosis, as well as anergia and anhedonia which may actually potentiate abuse. Thus, it is important to determine the daily dose duration of potential treatments such as direct (e.g. pramipexole) and indirect (e.g. GBR 12909) DA agonists, that may induce cross-tolerance with cocaine. We gave a cocaine challenge (15 mg/kg i.p.) on withdrawal day 7 and recorded ambulations and a behavioral rating. We found that 20- and 24-, but not 16-h, daily dosing with cocaine (40 mg/kg), for 14 days, induced tolerance. Pramipexole (4 mg/kg), administered for 24 but not 12 h per day, for 14 days, induced cocaine cross-tolerance while GBR 12909 (18 mg/kg), administered i.p. over 24 or 16 h a day, for 7 days, did not. Thus daily dosing duration is an important variable in consideration of stimulant abuse treatment.     

Morphine,d-Pen2,d-Pen5 enkephalin and U50,488H differentially affect the locomotor activity and behaviours induced by quinpirole in guinea-pigs

The effects of morphined-Pen²,d-Pen⁵ enkephalin (DPDPE) and U50,488H on the behavioural syndrome elicited by the dopamine (DA) D-2 agonist quinpirole, were investigated. Morphine (1, 5 and 15 mg/kg SC) and morphine administered intracerebroventricularly (ICV) (2×5 µl, 10^–3 M; total dose = 10 nmol) produced piloerection and sedation. DPDPE-ICV (2×5 µl and 2×10 µl, 10–³ M; total doses = 10 and 20 nmol) produced piloerection and sedation similar to morphine. U50,488H (1 mg/kg SC) induced locomotor activity and some stereotyped behaviour, whereas U50,488H (5 and 10 mg/kg SC) induced muscle rigidity and dystonic-like movements. The locomotor and behavioural response elicited by quinpirole (3 mg/kg IP) was attenuated in guinea-pigs pretreated with morphine (1, 5 and 15 mg/kg SC), morphine-ICV (2 × 5 µl, 10–³ M), and DPDPE-ICV (2 × 5 µl and 2 × 10 µl, 10^–3 M). These effects were reversed by naloxone (15 mg/kg SC). U50,488H (1 mg/kg SC) increased the quinpirole-induced locomotor activity, whereas U50,488H (5 and 10 mg/kg SC) decreased the locomotor activity and stereotyped behaviours produced by quinpirole. These results indicate that the gross behavioural effects of mu, delta and kappa opioids differ in guinea-pigs compared to other rodent species, and suggest differential involvement of these opioid receptor subtypes with DA D-2 receptor-mediated activity.     

Evidence for the role of nitric oxide in caffeine-induced locomotor activity in mice

Rationale Nitric oxide (NO) is implicated in the acute locomotor activating effects of some addictive drugs such as amphetamine and cocaine, but has not been investigated in the case of caffeine.Objectives We investigated the effects of a nitric oxide synthase (NOS) inhibitor N-Nitro-l-arginine methyl ester (l-NAME) and a combination of l-arginine, a NO precursor, and l-NAME on caffeine induced locomotor activity in Swiss Webster mice.Methods Locomotor activity was recorded for 30 min immediately following caffeine (0.25–128 mg/kg) or saline administration. In a further study, l-NAME (15 and 30 mg/kg) was administered to another group of mice 30 min before caffeine (1 and 16 mg/kg) injections. Finally, l-arginine (1000 mg/kg), a nitric oxide precursor, was administered 20 min before the l-NAME (15 and 30 mg/kg) treatments and locomotor activities were again recorded immediately after caffeine (1 and 16 mg/kg) injections.Results Caffeine (0.5–16 mg/kg) significantly increased locomotor activity, while l-NAME (30 mg/kg) blocked caffeine (1 and 16 mg/kg)-induced locomotor activity. The low dose of l-NAME blocked only caffeine (1 mg/kg)-induced locomotor activity. l-Arginine reversed the inhibitory effects of l-NAME on caffeine-induced locomotor activity. l-NAME and l-arginine had no effect on the locomotor activity of the mice when given by themselves.Conclusions The results suggest that caffeine-induced locomotor activity might be modulated by NO in mice.     

Behavioural and pharmacological magnetic resonance imaging assessment of the effects of methylphenidate in a potential new rat model of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder

Rationale The psychomotor stimulant methylphenidate is used in the treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Whereas the mechanism is not fully understood it is suggested to involve restoration of impaired dopamine function found in ADHD. Objectives The aim of this study was to determine the effects of methylphenidate on brain region activation in vivo using pharmacological magnetic resonance imaging (phMRI) in a potential rat model of ADHD. Methods Rats were treated bi-daily [from postnatal day (PND) 24] for 4 days with the dopamine re-uptake inhibitor GBR 12909 (30 mg/kg i.p) or vehicle (control). On PND 57 rats were administered methylphenidate (4 mg/kg i.p) and locomotor activity measured. In a separate group of animals, blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD) response was measured using phMRI to determine changes in brain region activation produced by methylphenidate (4 mg/kg i.p.) in GBR 12909-pretreated or control rats. Results Methylphenidate produced a greater locomotor-stimulant response in controls compared with GBR 12909 rats. Pretreatment with GBR 12909 reduced the BOLD response produced by methylphenidate compared with that in control animals. The main effects of methylphenidate on the BOLD response were seen in the caudate, frontal cortex, hippocampus and hypothalamus. Conclusions Short-term treatment with GBR 12909 in young rats causes long-term changes in dopaminergic systems, altering the methylphenidate-induced behavioural response and brain region activation compared with that in vehicle-pretreated rats. The results further support the view that altered dopaminergic function may be an important factor in ADHD and the value of animal models with this functional neurochemical deficit.     

Facilitating effects of some chlorpromazine-d-amphetamine mixtures on avoidance learning

The effects of several chlorpromazine-d-amphetamine mixtures on discriminated avoidance learning in rats have been studied and compared with the effects of d-amphetamine alone, and it has been found that some of these mixtures increase shock avoidance very significantly. The different mixtures cannot be compared on the basis of the same dose ratio, but some of the observed effects can probably be explained in terms of more or less sustained brain levels of d-amphetamineThe combined treatment of 1 mg/kg chlorpromazine and 1 mg/kg d-amphetamine is one of the most effective and an increase of conditioned responses and a decrease of interresponses is observed in this group as compared with the corresponding d-amphetamine 1 mg/kg group. The significance of these findings and the possible sources of this especial behavioural interaction of the two drugs are discussed.A preliminary report of this study was presented at the 7th International C.I.N.P. Congress, Praha, August 1970.With the technical assistance of Miss M^a Luz de Toro.     

Behavioral sensitization due to social defeat stress in mice: antagonism at mGluR5 and NMDA receptors

Rationale Repeated administration of psychostimulants progressively augments the behavioral response to and increases self-administration behavior of these drugs. Experience of repeated intermittent social defeat stress episodes also leads to a sensitized locomotor response following psychostimulant challenge. Both metabotropic and ionotropic glutamate receptors have been shown to be critical in the induction and expression of stimulant sensitization, but their role in sensitization due to social defeat stress remains unclear.Objective We evaluated the role of mGluR5 and NMDA glutamate receptors in the development of amphetamine-induced and social defeat stress-induced sensitization, using the non-competitive mGluR5 antagonist, MPEP, and the non-competitive NMDA antagonist, dizocilpine (MK-801).Methods In adult, male CFW mice, sensitization was induced by either ten daily injections of d-amphetamine (1 mg/kg) or ten daily brief episodes of social defeat. Mice were pretreated with MPEP (3 mg/kg or 10 mg/kg) or dizocilpine (0.1 mg/kg) prior to amphetamine injections. Mice subjected to social defeat were pretreated with MPEP (10 mg/kg) or dizocilpine (0.1 mg/kg). Ten days after induction, the expression of locomotor sensitization to amphetamine was determined.Results The induction of sensitization due to social defeat stress was prevented by MPEP, yet MPEP did not inhibit the development of behavioral sensitization to amphetamine. Confirming and extending earlier results, dizocilpine pretreatment blocked both amphetamine-induced and stress-induced sensitization.Conclusions These data indicate that behavioral sensitization to social defeat stress is dependent on mGluR5 receptors, whereas low-dose amphetamine sensitization may not be.     

Antagonism of the behavioral effects of cocaine and d-amphetamine by prazosin

Key pecking by pigeons was maintained under a 30-response fixed-ratio schedule of food delivery; lever pressing by squirrel monkeys was maintained under a 3-min fixed-interval schedule of food delivery. Administered alone, d-amphetamine (0.1–3.0 mg/kg), cocaine (1.0–3.0 mg/kg) and bupropion (1.0–30 mg/kg) either did not affect or decreased fixed-ratio responding of pigeons, whereas d-amphetamine (0.056–0.3 mg/kg) either increased or decreased (0.56 mg/kg) responding of monkeys maintained under the fixed-interval schedule. Prazosin, a selective centrally-active alpha₁ antagonist, produced a dose-dependent reversal of the rate-decreasing effects of d-amphetamine and cocaine but not of bupropion on fixed-ratio responding in pigeons. Prazosin also reversed both the rate-increasing and rate-decreasing effects of d-amphetamine on fixed-interval responding of squirrel monkeys. In contrast, the non-selective alpha-antagonist phentolamine enhanced d-amphetamine-induced decreases in fixed-ratio responding. These findings suggest that the behavioral effects of d-amphetamine and cocaine are produced at least in part by activation of central alpha₁ receptors. Prazosin may be a useful tool for better understanding the mechanisms through which cocaine, amphetamine, and other abused stimulant drugs exert their potent behavioral effects.