Validation of multiplex PCR strategy for simultaneous detection and identification of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus

Multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) strategy is described for rapid identification of clinically relevant methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) that targets mecA and coagulase genes. In this study, 150 staphylococcal clinical isolates were used that included 40 isolates of MRSA, 55 isolates of methicillin susceptible S. aureus (MSSA), 44 isolates of methicillin susceptible coagulase negative Staphylococcus spp. (MS-CoNS) and 11 isolates of methicillin resistant coagulase negative Staphylococcus spp. (MR-CoNS). Out of 55 S. aureus strains, three strains demonstrated mecA gene, which appeared to be oxacillin sensitive by disc diffusion. When (MS-CoNS) were evaluated, 10 isolates classified as oxacillin sensitive phenotypically, yielded positive results in PCR method. The results for mecA detection by PCR were more consistent with disk susceptibility tests in case of MRSA (100%) and MSSA (95%) isolates. In contrast to above results with MRSA and MSSA, mecA detection by PCR in MS-CoNS showed less correlation with disk susceptibility tests (77%). The results for coag detection by PCR were consistent with phenotypic tests in all isolates.     

Evaluation of three techniques for detection of low-level methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA): a disk diffusion method with cefoxitin and moxalactam,the Vitek 2 system,and the MRSA-screen latex agglutination test

Very-low-level methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), or class 1 MRSA, is often misdiagnosed as methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA). We evaluated the performances of three methods for detection of low-level methicillin resistance: the disk diffusion method using the cephamycin antibiotics cefoxitin and moxalactam, the Vitek 2 system (bioMérieux), and the MRSA-screen test (Denka). Detection of the mecA gene by PCR was considered to be the "gold standard." We also determined the sensitivity of the oxacillin disk diffusion method with 5- and 1-microg disks and that of the Oxascreen agar assay with 6 mg of oxacillin liter(-1) for detection of MRSA. We compared the distributions of MICs of oxacillin and cefoxitin by the E-test (AB Biodisk), and those of moxalactam by dilutions in agar, for MRSA and MSSA isolates. The 152 clinical isolates of S. aureus studied were divided into 69 MSSA (mecA-negative) and 83 MRSA (mecA-positive) isolates, including 63 heterogeneous isolates and 26 class 1 isolates (low-level resistance). The cefoxitin and moxalactam disk diffusion tests detected 100% of all the MRSA classes: cefoxitin inhibition zone diameters were <27 mm, and moxalactam inhibition zone diameters were <24 mm. The Vitek 2 system and the MRSA-screen test detected 94 and 97.6% of all MRSA isolates, respectively. The sensitivities of the 5- and 1-microg oxacillin disks were 95.2 and 96.4%, respectively, whereas that of the Oxascreen agar screen assay was 94%. All of the tests except the 1-microg oxacillin disk test were 100% specific. For the class 1 MRSA isolates, the sensitivity of the Vitek 2 test was 92.3%, whereas those of the MRSA-screen test and the disk diffusion method with cefoxitin and moxalactam were 100%. Therefore, the cefoxitin and moxalactam disk diffusion methods were the best-performing tests for routine detection of all classes of MRSA.     

Comparison of the BBL CHROMagar Staph aureus agar medium to conventional media for detection of Staphylococcus aureus in respiratory samples

Screening for Staphylococcus aureus has become routine in certain patient populations. This study is the first clinical evaluation of the BBL CHROMagar Staph aureus agar (CSA) medium (BD Diagnostics, Sparks, Md.) for detection of S. aureus in nasal surveillance cultures and in respiratory samples from cystic fibrosis (CF) patients. S. aureus colonies appear mauve on CSA. Other organisms are inhibited or produce a distinctly different colony color. S. aureus was identified from all media by slide coagulase, exogenous DNase, and mannitol fermentation assays. Susceptibility testing was performed using the agar dilution method. A total of 679 samples were evaluated. All samples were inoculated onto CSA. Nasal surveillance cultures were inoculated onto sheep blood agar (SBA) (BD Diagnostics), and samples from CF patients were inoculated onto mannitol salt agar (MSA) (BD Diagnostics). Of the 679 samples cultured, 200 organisms produced a mauve color on CSA (suspicious for S. aureus) and 180 were positive for S. aureus on SBA or MSA. Of 200 CSA-positive samples 191 were identified as S. aureus. Nine mauve colonies were slide coagulase negative and were subsequently identified as Staphylococcus lugdunensis (one), Staphylococcus epidermidis (three), Staphylococcus haemolyticus (one), and Corynebacterium species (four). CSA improved the ability to detect S. aureus by recovering 12 S. aureus isolates missed by conventional media. Of the 192 S. aureus isolates recovered, 122 were methicillin susceptible and 70 were methicillin resistant. Overall, the sensitivity and specificity of CSA in this study were 99.5 and 98%, respectively. There was no difference in the performance of the slide coagulase test or in susceptibility testing performed on S. aureus recovered from CSA compared to SBA or MSA. Our data support the use of CSA in place of standard culture media for detection of S. aureus in heavily contaminated respiratory samples.     

Multicenter evaluation of BBL CHROMagar MRSA medium for direct detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from surveillance cultures of the anterior nares

Active surveillance for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is among the strategies recommended by the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America for control of nosocomial MRSA infections. Infection control and laboratory personnel desire rapid, sensitive, and inexpensive methods to enhance surveillance activities. A multicenter study was performed to evaluate a new selective and differential chromogenic medium, BBL CHROMagar MRSA (C-MRSA) medium (BD Diagnostics, Sparks, MD), which enables recovery and concomitant identification of MRSA strains directly from nasal swab specimens taken from the anterior nares. Specimens were inoculated to C-MRSA and Trypticase soy agar with 5% sheep blood agar (TSA II, BD Diagnostics). Mauve colonies on C-MRSA at 24 h and 48 h and suspicious colonies on TSA II were confirmed as Staphylococcus aureus by Gram stain morphology and a coagulase test. In addition, the results of C-MRSA were compared to results of susceptibility testing (five different methods) of S. aureus strains isolated on TSA II. A total of 2,015 specimens were inoculated to C-MRSA and TSA II. Three hundred fifty-four S. aureus isolates were recovered; 208 (59%) were oxacillin (methicillin) susceptible and 146 (41%) were oxacillin resistant (MRSA). On C-MRSA, 139/146 or 95.2% of MRSA isolates were recovered, whereas recovery on TSA II was 86.9% (127/146) (P = 0.0027). The overall specificity of C-MRSA was 99.7%. When C-MRSA was compared to each susceptibility testing method, the sensitivity and specificity, respectively, were as follows: oxacillin MIC by broth microdilution, 94.4% and 96.7%; oxacillin screen agar, 94.3% and 96.7%; PBP2' latex agglutination, 93.7% and 98.5%; cefoxitin disk diffusion, 95.0% and 98.1%; and mecA PCR, 95.1% and 98.1%. In this study, C-MRSA was superior to TSA II for recovery of MRSA from surveillance specimens obtained from the anterior nares and was comparable to conventional, rapid, and molecular susceptibility methods for the identification of MRSA isolates.     

Evaluation of Hemofast MRSA for identification of Staphylococcus aureus and detection of methicillin-resistance staphylococci, directly in blood culture broths]

The newly developed Hemofast MRSA system for Staphylococcus aureus identification and methicillin-resistant staphylococci (MRS) detection in blood culture broths was evaluated in 106 Bactec broths containing grapelike clusters of Gram-positive cocci. All 26 S. aureus positive broths were correctly identified by Hemofast MRSA within two hours, and 81% were identified within one hour. Sensitivity and specificity were both 100%. Accuracy of MRS detection was 100%, i.e., no discrepancies versus the agar diffusion method were found. When the 28 broths containing coagulase negative staphylococci (CNS) were tested using an inoculum ten fold larger than for S. aureus testing, a number of discrepancy were recorded. For 49 other broths containing CNS, accuracy was 98.5% when the test was interpreted based on the growth rate of the strain, according to the manufacturer's instructions. One broth containing S. epidermidis strain susceptible yielded a false result with Hemofast MRSA, indicating that it probably contained a contaminant. The other discrepancies occurred with specimens containing mixed populations with CNS or a Micrococcus strain. Most (85%) results were available within 4 hrs 30 min, irrespective of the S. aureus or CNS strains. Avoiding the isolation step on agar, Hemofast MRSA saves 24 to 48 hours, thus allowing earlier antistaphylococcal treatment.     

Evaluation of a cefoxitin disk diffusion test for the routine detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

Two oxacillin disk methods were compared with a cefoxitin disk diffusion test for detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), with PCR for mecA as the reference method. When tested with 115 MRSA and 350 methicillin-susceptible S. aureus isolates, the cefoxitin disk test (specificity 100%, sensitivity 96.5%) was superior to the oxacillin disk methods (specificity 99.1%, sensitivity 90.4%). Testing with both oxacillin and cefoxitin disks would give better sensitivity (100%) than the cefoxitin test alone, but at the expense of specificity (99.1%). The cefoxitin disk test required no special test conditions and would improve the reliability of routine tests for detection of MRSA.     

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: evaluation of detection techniques on laboratory-passaged organisms

Strains of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) are a major cause of nosocomial infection. This has led to the widespread introduction of screening techniques to identify patients or staff colonised with the organism and prevent the spread of MRSA in the hospital environment. The aim of laboratory techniques for the detection of MRSA screening is the rapid isolation and identification of MRSA, enabling timely implementation of appropriate infection control measures. This study compares commercially available products used by the majority of laboratories during routine screening of samples for MRSA. Several selective media are tested, including mannitol salt agar, Mueller Hinton agar, milk agar and blood agars. The accuracy of combining rapid agglutination from selective media for identification of MRSA is also determined, using six commercially produced kits. Owing to debate concerning the use of enrichment broth, in addition to primary isolation on solid media, four enrichment broths are tested and compared to direct culture techniques. Using a selection of laboratory-passaged MRSA phage types, results demonstrated that mannitol salt agar containing 75 g/L NaCl, without the addition of oxacillin, recovered all 50 MRSA strains and produced the highest isolation rate. Robertson's cooked-meat broth, with 7.5% NaCl, proved the most effective enrichment medium and was more sensitive than direct culture by 3%. Pastorex Staph-plus proved to be the most efficient rapid agglutination kit when testing MRSA colonies removed directly from selective agars.     

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus outbreak in a veterinary teaching hospital: potential human-to-animal transmission

During a 13-month period, 11 equine patients visiting a veterinary teaching hospital for various diagnostic and surgical procedures developed postprocedural infections from which methicillin (oxacillin)-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) strains were isolated. The S. aureus isolates were identified by conventional methods that included Gram staining, tests for colonial morphology, tests for clumping factor, and tests for coagulase and urease activities and were also tested with the API STAPH IDENT system. Antimicrobial susceptibility tests were performed by the disk diffusion method. The biochemical profile and antibiogram of each isolate suggested that the isolates may have come from a common source. Because MRSA strains are very uncommon animal isolates but are rather common human isolates, a nasal swab specimen for culture was collected voluntarily from five persons associated with equine surgery and recovery in an attempt to identify a possible source of the organisms. MRSA strains were isolated from three of the five people, with one person found to be colonized with two biotypes of MRSA. The MRSA isolates from the people appeared to be identical to the isolates from horses. Further study of the isolates included SmaI and EagI macrorestriction analysis by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis conducted in two different laboratories. The results indicated that both the equine and human isolates were members of a very closely related group which appear to have originated from a common source. On the basis of the pattern associated with the infection, it is speculated that the members of the Veterinary Teaching Hospital staff were the primary source of the infection, although the specific mode of transmission is unclear.     

Methicillin-resistant Staphyloccocus aureus: evaluation of five selective media

This study evaluates the performance in isolating methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) of three media: the reduced salt formulation of mannitol salt agar plus oxacillin (MMSAO); CHROMagar Staph aureus plus ciprofloxacin (CHRAC); and Halifax MRSA medium (HMO), against the previously recommended mannitol salt agar (7% salt) plus oxacillin (OMSAO) and Baird-Parker medium plus ciprofloxacin (BPC). MRSA screening swabs were plated out onto the five selective media and the plates examined at 24 and 48 h. Suspected colonies were confirmed as MRSA by detection of heat-labile DNase, coagulase and/or protein A, and by confirming resistance to methicillin. Of 719 specimens examined, 191 grew MRSA on at least one medium. The relative sensitivities of the five media at 48 h were as follows: BPC, 94%; CHRAC, 70%; OMSAO, 61%; HMO, 56%; and MMSAO, 46%. In addition, BPC gave the least number of unnecessary investigations for non-MRSA isolates. The current advantage of BPC when performing direct culture for MRSA was confirmed. The other ciprofloxacin-containing medium also produced reasonable results. Of the two mannitol salt agar media, the formulation with 7% salt gave better results. HMO proved unreliable at isolating MRSA.     

Screening for methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci: an evaluation of three selective media and Mastalex-MRSA latex agglutination

Laboratory confirmation of MRSA is important for the implementation of infection control; conventional screening culture methods take up to five days for confirmation. The purpose of this study is to ascertain the efficiency of three selective media for growth of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) before and after enrichment in salt broth, and to evaluate the Mastalex-MRSA latex agglutination kit for detection of methicillin resistance. Screening swabs were collected from 63 patients, yielding 125 S. aureus isolates and 40 coagulase-negative staphylococcus (CNS) isolates. Selective media used were mannitol salt agar (MSA), Baird-Parker agar with ciprofloxacin (BPC) and bromocresol purple (BCPA). Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for mecA gene detection was used as the reference standard for evaluation of the Mastalex-MRSA assay, which was also evaluated on colonies of S. aureus from the selective media. No significant difference was found in efficiency of MRSA isolation among the selective media. Pre-enrichment in the salt broth did not enhance isolation of MRSA. Methicillin-sensitive S. aureus and CNS were significantly inhibited in all selective media (P<0.05). Only BPC significantly selected out methicillin-resistant CNS (P<0.01). Mastalex-MRSA was 97% specific and sensitive for the detection of MRSA. It was 65% sensitive and 100% specific in detecting methicillin resistance in CNS. In conclusion, all selective media performed equally well (MRSA isolation rate of approximately 80%). Mastalex-MRSA provided rapid and reliable detection of MRSA from selective media, reducing the time required for confirmation of this organism.     

Evaluation of the BBL Crystal MRSA ID System for detection of oxacillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus.

AIMS: To evaluate the BBL Crystal MRSA ID System for detection of oxacillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. METHODS: 52 methicillin resistant S aureus (MRSA) from five different countries and 85 methicillin susceptible S aureus (MSSA) were included. The species was confirmed by tube coagulation and detection of the clumping factor using the Staphaurex Plus. Clonal non-identity of the MRSA isolates was shown by pulsed field gel electrophoresis. MIC values (oxacillin) were determined using the Etest. Polymerase chain reaction was carried out to detect the mecA gene. The BBL Crystal MRSA ID System was carried out according to the manufacturer's instructions. RESULTS: The BBL Crystal MRSA ID System showed fluorescence in 45 of 52 MRSA (sensitivity 86.5%; negative predicitive value 92.2%), and the specificity was 97.6% (positive predicitive value 95.7%). Two of seven MRSA that failed to show fluorescence had MIC values (oxacillin) of 4 mg/litre. CONCLUSIONS: The BBL Crystal MRSA ID System is a valuable test for detecting oxacillin resistance in S aureus. Its major advantage is the short time (4-5 hours) required to perform the test when organisms are grown on tryptic soy agar or sheep blood agar. Difficulties may arise in borderline resistant isolates.     

Rapid Slide Latex Agglutination Test for Detection of Methicillin Resistance in Staphylococcus aureus

The MRSA screen test (Denka Seiken Co., Ltd.), a commercially available, rapid (20-min) slide latex agglutination test for the determination of methicillin resistance by detection of PBP 2a in Staphylococcus aureus, was compared with the oxacillin agar screen test and PCR detection of the mecA gene. A total of 563 S. aureus isolates were tested. Two hundred ninety-six of the isolates were methicillin-susceptible isolates from cultures of blood from consecutive patients. Also, 267 methicillin-resistant isolates that comprised 248 different phage types were tested. Methicillin resistance was defined as the presence of the mecA gene. Of the 267 mecA gene-positive isolates, 263 were positive by the MRSA screen test (sensitivity, 98.5%), and all the mecA-gene negative strains were negative by the MRSA screen test (specificity, 100%). The oxacillin agar screen test detected methicillin resistance in 250 of the mecA gene-positive isolates (sensitivity, 93.6%). The sensitivity of the MRSA screen test was statistically significantly higher than the sensitivity of the oxacillin agar screen test (P < 0. 05). The MRSA screen test is a highly sensitive and specific test for the detection of methicillin resistance. Also, it offers results within half an hour and is easy to perform, which makes this test a valuable tool in the ongoing battle against methicillin-resistant S. aureus.     

Latex agglutination for rapid identification of methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus recovered from selective media

The accuracy of combining latex agglutination with selective media for the identification of methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus (MRSA) was determined. Test strains were identified by latex agglutination on blood agar, the heat-stable thermonuclease test and broth microdilution MICs of oxacillin and included 97 MRSA, 56 methicillin-susceptibleStaphylococcus aureus, 52 methicillin resistant, and 49 methicillin-susceptibleStaphylococcus species. Isolates were grown on trypticase-soy agar with 5 % sheep red blood cells (TSAB), Mueller-Hinton agar (MHA), mannitol-salt agar (MSA), and four media designed for the selective growth of MRSA: TSAB with clindamycin and gentamicin, MHA with oxacillin, MSA with oxacillin, and lipovitellin-salt-mannitol agar (LVSM) with 1 µg oxacillin disks applied. The mean sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value for the combination of latex agglutination with selective media for the identification of MRSA was 96 %, 99 % and 98 % respectively.     

In vitro activity of the pristinamycin against the isolated staphylococci in the french hospitals in 1999-2000

One thousand six hundred and fifty clinically significant, consecutive and non redundant strains of staphylococci, including 863 Staphylococcus aureus and 787 coagulase negative staphylococci (CNS), were isolated between October 1999 and March 2000 in 35 French hospital laboratories. Susceptibilities were determined in each center by a standard diffusion method according to the recommendations of CA-SFM. Strains with vancomycin zone size diameter <17 mm were sent to the central laboratory for MIC determination of vancomycin by agar dilution, as recommended by the CA-CSFM. Frequencies of resistance to oxacillin were 38.6% for S. aureus (MRSA), 54% for the CNS, all species and 62% for S. epidermidis, respectively. The antibiotics tested showed a good activity against strains of S. aureus susceptible to oxacillin, more than 95% of strains being susceptible except for erythromycin (82.6%). Against MRSA, vancomycin and prisitinamycin had the highest rates of susceptible strains, greater than 93% for the later antibiotic. More than 92% of strains of CNS susceptible or resistant to oxacillin were sensitive to pristinamycin. Pristinamycin displayed a good activity whether the strains were constitutively or inducibly resistant to MLS(B). It comes out from this in vitro study that the rate of resistance of staphylococci to pristinamycin remains weak and stable in France. Pristinamycin is a good alternative for oral treatment of staphylococcal infections.     

Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus: Comparison of Susceptibility Testing Methods and Analysis of mecA-Positive Susceptible Strains

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is responsible for an increasing number of serious nosocomial and community-acquired infections. Phenotypic heterogeneous drug resistance (heteroresistance) to antistaphylococcal beta-lactams affects the results of susceptibility testing. The present study compared the MRSA-Screen latex agglutination test (Denka Seiken Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) for detection of PBP 2a with agar dilution, the VITEK-1 and VITEK-2 systems (bioMérieux, St. Louis, Mo.), and the oxacillin agar screen test for detection of MRSA, with PCR for the mecA gene used as the "gold standard" assay. Analysis of 107 methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) isolates and 203 MRSA isolates revealed that the MRSA-Screen latex agglutination test is superior to any single phenotype-based susceptibility testing method, with a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 99.1%. Only one isolate that lacked mecA was weakly positive by the MRSA-Screen latex agglutination test. This isolate was phenotypically susceptible to oxacillin and did not contain the mecA gene by Southern blot hybridization. The oxacillin agar screen test, the VITEK-1 system, the VITEK-2 system, and agar dilution showed sensitivities of 99.0, 99.0, 99.5, and 99%, respectively, and specificities of 98.1, 100, 97.2, and 100%, respectively. The differences in sensitivity or specificity were not statistically significant. Oxacillin bactericidal assays showed that mecA- and PBP 2a-positive S. aureus isolates that are susceptible to antistaphylococcal beta-lactams by conventional methods are functionally resistant to oxacillin. We conclude that the accuracy of the MRSA-Screen latex agglutination method for detection of PBP 2a approaches the accuracy of PCR and is more accurate than any susceptibility testing method used alone for the detection of MRSA.     

Mannitol salt agar-cefoxitin combination as a screening medium for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

In disk diffusion tests, cefoxitin is now considered a better indicator than oxacillin for the presence of the mecA gene in Staphylococcus aureus. A logical extension of this work is the incorporation of cefoxitin into media selective for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). This paper describes the development and subsequent testing of mannitol salt agar containing 4 mg/liter cefoxitin with a unique collection of well-characterized MRSA strains, including low-level methicillin-resistant strains and an equal number of known mecA-negative S. aureus strains. The agar supported the growth of 96.6% of the mecA-positive strains in the collection and inhibited the growth of 100% of the mecA-negative strains. These results suggest that selective media based on cefoxitin are superior to those based on oxacillin for the detection of MRSA.     

Evaluation of an isothermal signal amplification method for rapid detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from patient-screening swabs

A new molecular assay (CytAMP) utilizing isothermal signal-mediated amplification of RNA was evaluated for rapid detection of methicillin (oxacillin)-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). The assay targeted the coa (coagulase) and mecA genes, thereby simultaneously identifying S. aureus and methicillin (oxacillin) resistance. Results were obtained in approximately 3.5 h as a color signal in 96-well microtiter plates. The detection limit was between 2 x 10(5) and 10(6) CFU/assay, equivalent to 4 x 10(6) to 2 x 10(7) CFU/ml in an overnight broth. This level of growth was obtained with an initial inoculum of 10 to 50 CFU. The CytAMP assay and a mecA-femB PCR assay both detected 113 MRSA strains among 396 clinical isolates of bacteria (CytAMP sensitivity and specificity were both 100% relative to those of PCR). Conventional culture detected 109 MRSA strains, but with 19 false-positive and 23 false-negative results relative to both molecular methods. Discrepancies were also observed for 100 enrichment broths containing MRSA screening swabs, with 11 broths culture negative but PCR positive. CytAMP and PCR were more in agreement, but six broths were CytAMP negative and PCR positive. Five of these contained 10(2) to 10(5) CFU/assay (below the CytAMP detection limit of 2 x 10(5) CFU/assay), and the sixth contained 10(6) CFU/assay. Overall, culture and CytAMP had similar sensitivities and specificities relative to those of PCR, but the CytAMP assay enabled swabs to be analyzed as a batch following overnight incubation in enrichment broth, with results reported before 12 noon the next day.     

Evaluation of the impact of direct plating, broth enrichment, and specimen source on recovery and diversity of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates among HIV-infected outpatients

We compared recovery of Staphylococcus aureus and methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) from nasal and groin swab specimens of 600 HIV-infected outpatients by selective and nonselective direct plating and broth enrichment. Swabs were collected at baseline, 6-month, and 12-month visits and cultured by direct plating to mannitol salt agar (MSA) and CHROMagar MRSA (CM) and overnight broth enrichment with subculture to MSA (broth). MRSA isolates were characterized by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec) typing, and PCR for the Panton-Valentine leukocidin. At each visit, 13 to 15% of patients were colonized with MRSA and 30 to 33% were colonized with methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA). Broth, CM, and MSA detected 95%, 82%, and 76% of MRSA-positive specimens, respectively. MRSA recovery was significantly higher from broth than CM (P ≤ 0.001) or MSA (P ≤ 0.001); there was no significant difference in recovery between MSA and CM. MSSA recovery also increased significantly when using broth than when using MSA (P ≤ 0.001). Among specimens collected from the groin, broth, CM, and MSA detected 88%, 54%, and 49% of the MRSA-positive isolates, respectively. Broth enrichment had a greater impact on recovery of MRSA from the groin than from the nose compared to both CM (P ≤ 0.001) and MSA (P ≤ 0.001). Overall, 19% of MRSA-colonized patients would have been missed with nasal swab specimen culture only. USA500/Iberian and USA300 were the most common MRSA strains recovered, and USA300 was more likely than other strain types to be recovered from the groin than from the nose (P = 0.05).     

Comparison of culture screening methods for detection of nasal carriage of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: a prospective study comparing 32 methods

Screening for carriage of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is fundamental to modern-day nosocomial infection control, both for epidemiologic investigation and day-to-day decisions on barrier isolation. Numerous microbiologic techniques have been advocated for screening for nasal carriage of MRSA, including the use of charcoal rather than rayon swabs, preincubation of swabs in Stuart's medium, preincubation of swabs in salt-containing trypticase soy broth (TSB), use of mannitol-salt agar (MSA), use of MSA containing oxacillin (MSA(Ox)), use of Mueller-Hinton agar containing oxacillin (MHA(Ox)), and the use of MSA containing lipovitellin with an oxacillin disk (MSAL(Ox)). We report a prospective clinical trial undertaken to test all of these methods concurrently. Patients at high risk for MRSA carriage were screened with eight consecutive nasal swabs (four standard rayon, four charcoal-coated rayon), which were processed by primary plating on MSA, MSA(Ox), MHA(Ox), and MSAL(Ox); Stuart's preincubation for 72 h followed by plating on the solid media; overnight enrichment in salt-containing TSB followed by plating; and Stuart's preincubation for 72 h followed by overnight enrichment in TSB and plating. All of the above methods were repeated with charcoal swabs. Each patient was screened by 32 culture methods. Forty-three (42%) of 102 patients studied were positive for MRSA by one or more methods. Among the four media evaluated with direct plating, MSAL(Ox) was 11 to 25% more sensitive for detecting MRSA (MSAL(Ox) versus MSA(Ox) or MHA(Ox) or MSA, each P < 0.01). Preincubation in Stuart's medium for 72 h did not enhance recovery of MRSA. Enrichment in salt-containing TSB further increased yield 9%. MSAL(Ox) also showed the best specificity, 93%. Charcoal swabs showed no advantage over standard rayon swabs. Our results suggest that the highest yield will be achieved by using standard rayon swabs that are enriched overnight in TSB with inoculation onto MSAL(Ox) medium. Direct inoculation of swabs onto MSAL(Ox) allows detection of 90% of MRSA carriers.     

Mueller–Hinton agar is superior to PDM blood agar for detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

The aim of this study was to compare the expression of oxacillin resistance in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) on Paper Disc Method agar supplemented with 5% defibrinated blood (PDM blood agar) and Mueller–Hinton agar supplemented with 2% NaCl (MH NaCl agar) using different susceptibility tests. Fifty mecA- containing isolates of S. aureus, exhibiting 46 different pulsed-field gel electrophoresis patterns, were comparatively tested using the E test, the single disk diffusion test, and the multipoint inoculation technique, under various culture conditions. The E test incubated at 35 °C for 24 h (breakpoint of resistance ≥2.0 mg/L) detected 94% of the isolates on MH NaCl agar, compared with 28% for PDM blood agar ( P  < 0.05). The disk diffusion test (breakpoint ≤ 10 mm in diameter) under these incubation conditions detected resistance in 100% of the isolates on MH NaCl agar and in 80% of the isolates on PDM blood agar ( P  < 0.05). The multipoint technique (breakpoint ≥1 mg/L), applied at 35 °C for 24 h, detected 100% on MH NaCl agar and 46% on PDM blood agar ( P  < 0.05). Irrespective of the method of susceptibility testing evaluated, MH NaCl agar was superior to PDM blood agar for the detection of oxacillin resistance in mecA -containing S. aureus .