Long-term results for Heller-myotomy with anterior semifundoplication in achalasia

INTRODUCTION: The positive success rate of cardiomyotomy in the treatment of achalasia has recently - especially in young patients - resulted in a primary operative treatment concept. Few studies of long-term effects of myotomy concerning the removal of dysphagia and the development of gastroesophageal reflux have been submitted. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In the period between September 1985 and March 2003, an open, transabdominal Heller-myotomy combined with a Dor-semifundoplication was carried out in 93 patients with achalasia. 77 patients were followed for more than 6 months postoperatively (median follow-up: 70 months). The procedure was prospectively observed, and patients were questioned concerning their clinical symptoms by means of structured interviews. X-ray examinations of the esophagus were pre- and postoperatively available of 47 patients, manometrical findings before and after myotomy of 26 patients. RESULTS: The pre-operatively existing symptoms dysphagia, regurgitation, retrosternal pain and weight-loss could be improved by myotomy in 97 % of the patients with good to excellent long-term results. Post-operatively, a significant reduction of the median maximum diameter of the esophagus of 50 mm to 30 mm was evident (p < 0.001), whereas the diameter of the cardia increased from 3 mm to 10 mm (p < 0.001). The pre-operative resting pressure of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) of 29.3 mmHg was reduced to 7.9 mmHg (p < 0.001). Patients suffering from reflux esophagitis showed a significant lower resting pressure of the LES (4 mmHg) in comparison with patients without reflux esophagitis (8.5 mmHg) after myotomy (p=0.045). The clinical long-term results of patients with preceding pneumatic dilation did not differ significantly from those with primary myotomy. CONCLUSION: Conventional Heller-myotomy with anterior semifundoplication can in the long run remove the symptoms existent in achalasia with high efficiency. If the decrease of the post-operative resting pressure of the LES is too intense (< 5 mmHg), a possible gastroesophageal reflux has to be taken into account. The results of open cardiomyotomy have to be regarded as standard for assessing the minimal-invasive procedure.     

Videoscopic heller myotomy as first-line therapy for severe achalasia.

To many nonsurgeons myotomy is considered an excessively invasive treatment for achalasia and has become a salvage procedure when esophageal dilation and botulinum toxin (botox) injections fail. We sought to examine our experience with videoscopic Heller myotomy to determine whether preoperative therapy predicts perioperative complications and long-term outcome. Videoscopic Heller myotomy was undertaken in 111 patients with achalasia between June 1992 and May 2000. Intraoperative endoscopy was used in all patients. Fundoplication was used selectively for patients with large hiatal hernias or as part of repair of esophageal perforation. Patients were asked to grade their dysphagia and reflux symptoms before and after myotomy on a scale of 0 (no symptoms) to 5 (severe symptoms). Patients were also asked to rate their outcome as excellent (no symptoms), good (greatly improved), fair (slightly improved), or poor (not improved) compared with their preoperative status. Patients were stratified on the basis of preoperative intervention (botox, pneumatic dilation, botox and pneumatic dilation, or no botox or dilation) and compared. Previous pneumatic dilation and/or botox injection had been undertaken before operation in 88 (79%) patients whereas 23 (21%) patients had no invasive preoperative therapy. The overall mean preoperative dysphagia score was 4.8+/-0.8 and mean preoperative reflux score was 3.3+/-2.1. Groups of patients undergoing preoperative interventions were similar to those patients not undergoing preoperative interventions in terms of preoperative symptoms, dysphagia scores, and reflux scores. Postoperative complications (13%) and perforations (8%) were slightly more common in patients who had undergone preoperative botox or dilation (P = not significant). Subjectively, operative myotomy was more difficult in patients who had preoperative botox or dilation. Patients had significant improvement in dysphagia, dysphagia score, reflux score, emesis/ regurgitation, and chest pain (P < 0.05) regardless of preoperative intervention. After myotomy patients who had never undergone botox or pneumatic dilation were less likely to have mild dysphagia compared with those with previous botox injections (30% vs 53%; P = 0.09), previous dilations (30% vs 54%; P = 0.09), or both (30% vs 59%; P = 0.04). As well, dysphagia scores were better if no preoperative therapy had been undertaken: botox 0.8+/-1.3, dilation 1.0+/-1.4, botox and dilation 1.0+/-1.3, and no therapy 0.3+/-0.7 (P < 0.05). Overall 97 per cent of patients stated that their symptoms were improved although more patients tended to have excellent or good outcomes if no preoperative intervention was undertaken (91%) compared with patients undergoing preoperative botox (86%), dilation (83%), or both (82%) (P = not significant). We conclude that videoscopic Heller myotomy is safe and efficacious particularly in patients who have not undergone previous endoscopic interventions. The difference in patients' outcomes based on preoperative therapy may be related to a less difficult operation in patients who forgo endoscopic therapy and elect to undergo early myotomy. Although videoscopic Heller myotomy provides good outcomes as a salvage procedure after failed dilations and/or botox injections for achalasia we advocate it as first-line therapy in reasonable operative candidates.     

Videoscopic Heller myotomy for achalasia--results beyond short-term follow-up

BACKGROUND: Heller myotomy has long been utilized for patients failing nonoperative management of achalasia. Videoscopy has been advocated to decrease the morbidity of Heller myotomy; however, few reports document outcome beyond 1 year after videoscopic Heller myotomy. PURPOSE: To determine perioperative morbidity, relief of dysphagia, and the incidence of postoperative reflux symptoms following videoscopic Heller myotomy with follow-up to over 4 years. METHODS: Patients with achalasia documented by barium esophogram and esophageal manometry underwent videoscopic Heller myotomy beginning in 1992. Intraoperative peroral endoscopy was utilized to guide the cephalad and caudad extent of myotomy. A barium esophogram was undertaken in the immediate postoperative period to evaluate for subclinical leak and assess esophageal emptying. RESULTS: Seventy-eight patients underwent videoscopic Heller myotomy. The mean age was 51 years +/- 19 (range 14 to 91). Most (62%) patients had undergone pneumatic dilation prior to surgical consultation and 54% had previous botox injections. All patients complained of dysphagia and 40% had symptoms of heartburn prior to myotomy. After myotomy, 91% of patients stated that their swallowing was improved with myotomy. Thirteen patients (18%) experience heartburn more than once per week after myotomy. The average length of stay was 2 +/- 2 days, with 72% of patients spending 2 days or fewer in the hospital. Six (7.7%) major complications occurred: five esophageal perforations and one enterotomy without long-term sequellae. Three procedures (3.8%) were converted to "open" procedures. No deaths occurred. We conclude that videoscopic Heller myotomy is safe and efficacious, with low morbidity and mortality. Videoscopic myotomy provides relief beyond the short term for dysphagia due to achalasia with minimal reflux symptoms. We advocate videoscopic Heller myotomy in the treatment of severe dysphagia due to achalasia not adequately palliated by or amenable to nonoperative management.     

Laparoscopic Heller myotomy with Toupet fundoplication: outcomes predictors in 121 consecutive patients

HYPOTHESIS: This study was performed to assess the intermediate-term outcomes after laparoscopic Heller myotomy and posterior Toupet fundoplication in a single-surgeon series with the expectation of identifying patient and disease factors associated with poor outcomes. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data. SETTING: Tertiary care teaching hospital with a comprehensive esophageal physiology laboratory. PATIENTS: A total of 121 patients undergoing laparoscopic Heller myotomy with Toupet fundoplication (between December 1, 1996, and December 31, 2004) for achalasia were included. INTERVENTIONS: All patients had preoperative objective documentation of achalasia. A 5- to 6-cm-long myotomy was performed on the distal esophagus. The myotomy incision was extended 2 cm onto the stomach. A partial (270 degrees ) posterior Toupet fundoplication was performed as an antireflux mechanism in all patients. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Data on preoperative and postoperative symptoms, manometry, and 24-hour ambulatory pH were prospectively collected. Symptoms were recorded with a standardized assessment tool. Patients with postoperative dysphagia scores of 2 or greater were considered treatment failure. Logistic regression modeling was performed to identify variables significant for poor outcomes. RESULTS: Preoperatively, 89 patients (73.6%) had severe dysphagia (dysphagia score, 3 or 4) and 32 patients (26.4%) had mild or moderate dysphagia (dysphagia score, 1 or 2). After a median follow-up period of 9 months, 102 patients (84.3%) (P<.001) had excellent relief of dysphagia (dysphagia score, 0 or 1). Eight additional patients (6.6%) demonstrated a significant (25%-75% [P=.01]) improvement in dysphagia scores. Only 11 patients (9.0%) had either no change or worse dysphagia. Postoperatively, all patients with manometry had a normal lower esophageal sphincter pressure (mean +/- SD, 14.7 +/- 6.6 mm Hg; P<.001) and good lower esophageal sphincter relaxation. Odds of failure were greatest for patients with severe preoperative dysphagia, male patients, and patients with classic amotile achalasia. Of the 60 patients having heartburnlike symptoms preoperatively (mean +/- SD score, 2.52 +/- 1.00), 19 (31.7%) continued to have similar symptoms after surgery. Sixteen (33.3%) of the 48 patients having postoperative pH studies demonstrated objective reflux (DeMeester score, >14.7). Five (31.2%) of these patients had symptoms of their reflux. CONCLUSIONS: Dysphagia improves in most patients after laparoscopic Heller myotomy with partial fundoplication. Patients with severe preoperative dysphagia, esophageal dilation, or amotile achalasia may have greater chances of a poor outcome.     

Pneumatic dilatation and operative treatment of achalasia in children

The therapeutic approach to children with achalasia of the esophagus is controversial. Both pneumatic dilatation (PD) and Heller esophageal myotomy (EM) are considered effective, while bougienage has been discarded by most authorities. To determine the best place for each in the therapy of achalasia, 19 cases treated since 1964 were reviewed. Ages ranged from 9 months to 17 years (median 11 years), and duration of symptoms ranged from 4 months to 8 years (median 1 year). Three patients had symptoms from infancy. Two patients underwent a successful EM as their sole procedure. Two underwent bougienage as their initial therapy. Dysphagia recurred quickly and both required operation. Fifteen underwent PD under intravenous sedation with a Brown-McHardy dilator placed under fluoroscopy. Seven underwent a single dilatation; seven underwent two; and one underwent four. Relief of dysphagia was achieved in 11 patients, but four required surgery. The patients who experienced adequate relief with dilatation alone were clinically identical to those in whom it failed with respect to age, race, sex, symptom duration, and manometric data. Those who required EM following PD experienced only a brief period of relief following PD (median 1 month) compared with those who enjoyed lasting results (median 18 months). Three patients suffered prolonged chest pain or fever following PD, but without esophageal leakage and with full recovery. Two of eight operative patients developed late postoperative reflux. There were no deaths. Both PD and EM are safe and effective treatments for achalasia. Our results indicate that dilatation is the logical first therapeutic step, but rapid recurrence of symptoms may identify those patients who will require operative myotomy.     

Video-assisted surgical management of achalasia of the esophagus.

PURPOSE: Video-assisted surgical approaches to esophageal achalasia continue to be explored by many surgeons involved in the management of this motor disorder. We report our experience with thoracoscopic and laparoscopic esophagomyotomy to more clearly define the efficacy and safety of these approaches. PATIENTS: Over 73 months, 58 patients with achalasia underwent thoracoscopic myotomy (n = 19) alone or laparoscopic myotomy (n = 39) with partial fundoplication (anterior = 15; posterior = 24). Mean age was 47.2 years and average length of symptoms was 60 months. Primary symptoms were as follows: dysphagia, 100%; pulmonary abnormalities, 22%; weight loss; 47%, and pain, 45%. Mean esophageal diameter was 6 cm and tortuosity was present in 16% (9/58) of patients. Prior management consisted of dilation (n = 47), botulinum toxin injection (n = 8), and prior myotomy (n = 1). METHODS: In the operating room all patients underwent endoscopic examination and evacuation of retained esophageal contents. The esophagomyotomy was extended 4 cm superiorly and inferiorly to 1 cm beyond the lower esophageal sphincter. Thoracoscopic and laparoscopic procedures were completed in all patients without conversion to an open operation. Mean operative time was 183 minutes (+/-58.1) and hospital stay averaged 2.3 days (+/-0.8). There was no operative mortality. The 1 operative complication was a perforation that was identified during the operation and repaired thoracoscopically. RESULTS: Symptoms improved in 97% of patients. Mean dysphagia scores (range 0-10) decreased from 9.8 +/- 1.6 before the operation to 2.0 +/- 1.5 after the operation (P <.001) at a mean follow-up of 6 months. Postoperative reflux symptoms developed in 5% (1/19) of the thoracoscopy group and 8% (4/39) of the laparoscopy group. Nine patients have persistent or recurrent dysphagia (16%). Seven patients have successfully undergone Savary dilation, and 2 required esophagectomy to manage recalcitrant dysphagia. CONCLUSION: At this intermediate term analysis, video-assisted approaches for management of achalasia are a reasonable alternative to extended medical therapy or open operations.     

How I Do It: Laparoscopic Heller Myotomy with Toupet Fundoplication for Achalasia

Achalasia, an esophageal motility disorder characterized by aperistalsis and failure of lower esophageal sphincter (LES) relaxation, is most effectively treated by surgical ablation of the LES. In this report, we describe our technique of laparoscopic extended Heller myotomy with Toupet partial posterior fundoplication. The technical details of this procedure include careful division of the longitudinal and circular muscle fibers of the LES anteriorly, including extension of the myotomy 3 cm distal to the esophagogastric junction onto the gastric cardia. The Toupet procedure, involving a posterior wrap of the gastric fundus which is secured to both edges of the myotomy as well as to the crura of the hiatus, is added to prevent post-myotomy gastroesophageal reflux. From a recently published report, mean dysphagia scores remained low (3 out of 10 severity on a visual analog scale) and symptoms of reflux were reported minimally in a series of 63 patients followed for a median of 45 months. This technique provides excellent and durable relief of dysphagia associated with achalasia while minimizing post-myotomy acid reflux symptoms.     

Comparison of the Heller–Toupet procedure with the Heller–Dor procedure in patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery for achalasia

Purpose

We compared the outcomes of Toupet fundoplication with those of Dor fundoplication in patients with achalasia who underwent laparoscopic Heller myotomy.

Methods

Seventy-two patients with achalasia and dysphagia underwent laparoscopic Heller myotomy with fundoplication performed by a single surgeon. Heller–Toupet fundoplication (HT) was performed in 30 patients, and Heller–Dor fundoplication (HD) was done in 42. The symptoms and esophageal function were retrospectively assessed in both groups.

Results

The dysphagia scores significantly decreased after both the HT and HD procedures, and did not differ significantly between them. The incidence of reflux symptoms was significantly higher after HT (26.7 %) than after HD (7.1 %). The lower esophageal sphincter (LES) resting pressure significantly decreased after both HT and HD. Upon endoscopic examination, the incidence of reflux esophagitis was significantly higher after HT (38.5 %) than after HD (8.8 %). During esophageal pH monitoring, the fraction time at pH <4 was similar in the patients who underwent HT and HD.

Conclusions

Laparoscopic Heller myotomy provided significant improvements in the dysphagia symptoms of achalasia patients, regardless of the type of fundoplication. The incidences of reflux symptoms and reflux esophagitis were higher after HT than after HD. However, the results of pH monitoring did not differ between the procedures.     

An antireflux procedure should not routinely be added to a heller myotomy

Summary Achalasia is a disease that can only be palliated, not corrected, by surgery. The philosophy at Vanderbilt has been to maximize the relief of dysphagia through myotomy that is measured using intraoperative endoscopy while minimizing the mechanical factors that may increase gastroesophageal reflux. Only a few of our patients (3 [ 13 %] of 24) have developed pathologic reflex after Heller myotomy without an antireflux procedure, and all have been treated medically with excellent results. The addition of an antireflux procedure would inappropriately treat the 87% of patients who have no objective measurement of gastroesophageal reflux. Because gastroesophageal reflux does occur in patients who have undergone Heller myotomy and Dor fundoplication, we have chosen not to add a procedure that may increase dysphagia. Our argument against the routine use of fundoplication rests on the concept that a fundoplication, either total or partial, increases resistance to flow across the LES and therefore decreases symptom relief. Our studies, as well as others, indicate that esophageal clearance is an important aspect of reflux after Heller myotomy, and postoperatively patients with achalasia are more prone to long periods of acid exposure caused by inadequate clearance. Symptoms of GERD in patients with achalasia do not correlate with objective measurements of acid exposure in the esophagus; therefore they cannot be used to follow up patients after Heller myotomy. Gastroesophageal reflux can be a significant problem in patients whether they have undergone Heller myotomy alone or Heller myotomy plus fundoplication. We recommend 24-hour pH studies to monitor acid exposure in the distal esophagus postoperatively to identify pathologic GERD after Heller myotomy. Patients found to have pathologic reflux after Heller myotomy with or without fundoplication should be treated medically. In short, acid reflux after a myotomy can be controlled simply with medication, but dysphagia requires more drastic and potentially hazardous treatment such as pneumatic dilatation or reoperation.     

Comparison of thoracoscopic and laparoscopic heller myotomy for achalasia

For more than three decades experts have debated the relative merits of thoracoscopic Heller myotomy (no antireflux procedure) vs. laparoscopic Heller myotomy plus Dor fundoplication for treatment of achalasia. The aim of this study was to compare the results of these two methods with respect to (1) relief of dysphagia, (2) incidence of postoperative gastroesophageal reflux, and (3) hospital course. Sixty patients with esophageal achalasia were operated on between 1991 and 1996. Thirty underwent a thoracoscopic Heller myotomy and 30 had a laparoscopic Heller myotomy with a Dor fundoplication. The two groups were similar with respect to demographic characteristics, clinical findings, and extent of manometric abnormalities. Preoperative pH monitoring showed abnormal reflux in two patients in the laparoscopic group. Average hospital stay was 84 hours for the thoracoscopic group and 42 hours for the laparoscopic group. Excellent (no dysphagia) or good (dysphagia less than once a week) results were obtained in 87% of patients in the thoracoscopic group and in 90% of patients in the laparoscopic group. Postoperative pH monitoring showed abnormal reflux in 6 (60%) of 10 patients in the thoracoscopic group and in 1 (10%) of 10 patients in the laparoscopic group. The two patients in the laparoscopic group who had reflux preoperatively had normal reflux scores postoperatively. Laparoscopic Heller myotomy with Dor fundoplication was found to be superior to thoracoscopic Heller myotomy. Both operations relieved dysphagia, but the laparoscopic approach avoided postoperative reflux and even corrected reflux present preoperatively. In addition, the patients were more comfortable and left the hospital earlier following a laparoscopic myotomy. Whether it is truly possible to perform a Heller myotomy without an antireflux procedure in a way that relieves dysphagia and regularly avoids reflux remains questionable. Presented at the Thirty-Eighth Annual Meeting ofThe Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, Washington, D.C., May 11–14, 1997 (poster presentation).     

Efficacy and durability of robotic heller myotomy for achalasia: patient symptoms and satisfaction at long-term follow-up

Background

Laparoscopic Heller myotomy (LHM) has become the standard treatment for achalasia in the USA. Robot-assisted Heller myotomy (RHM) has emerged as an alternative approach due to improved visualization and fine motor control, but long-term follow-up studies have not been reported. We sought to report the long-term outcomes of RHM and compare them to those of LHM.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study was performed for patients who underwent laparoscopic or RHM between 1995 and 2006. Long-term follow-up was performed via mail or telephone questionnaire. The primary outcome measure was durable relief of dysphagia without need for further intervention. Secondary outcomes included gastroesophageal reflux symptoms, disease-specific quality of life, and patient satisfaction with their operation.

Results

Seventy-five patients underwent laparoscopic (n = 19) or robotic (n = 56) myotomy during the study period. Long-term follow-up was obtained in 53 (71 %) patients with a median interval of 9 years. RHM was associated with a decreased mucosal injury rate (0 vs. 16 %, p = 0.01) and median hospital stay (1 vs. 2 days, p < 0.01) compared to conventional laparoscopy. All patients reported initial dysphagia relief, and 80 % required no further intervention. This did not differ between groups. Sixty-two percent required medications to control reflux symptoms at long-term follow-up, including 56 % following robotic myotomy and 80 % after laparoscopic myotomy (p = 0.27). Overall, 95 % of patients were satisfied with their operation, and 91 % would choose surgery again given the benefit of hindsight.

Conclusion

There is a dearth of long-term follow-up data to support the effectiveness of RHM. This study demonstrates durable dysphagia relief in the vast majority of patients with a high degree of patient satisfaction and a low rate of esophageal mucosal injury. While a significant proportion of patients report reflux symptoms, these symptoms are well controlled with medical acid suppression.     

Surgical management of hypertensive lower esophageal sphincter with dysphagia or chest pain

Hypertensive lower esophageal sphincter (LES) is an uncommon manometric abnormality found in patients with dysphagia and chest pain, and is sometimes associated with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Preventing reflux by performing a fundoplication raises concerns about inducing or increasing dysphagia. The role of myotomy in isolated hypertensive LES is also unclear. The aim of this study was to determine the outcome of surgical therapy for isolated hypertensive LES and for hypertensive LES associated with GERD. Sixteen patients (5 males and 11 females), ranging in age from 39 to 89 years, with hypertensive LES (>26 mm Hg; i.e., >95th percentile of our control population) who had surgical therapy between 1996 and 1999 were reviewed. Patients with a diagnosis of achalasia and diffuse esophageal spasm were excluded. All patients had dysphagia or chest pain. Eight of 16 patients had symptoms of GERD, four had a type III hiatal hernia, and four had isolated hypertensive LES pain. Patients with hypertensive LES and GERD or type III hiatal hernia had a Nissen fundoplication, and those with isolated hypertensive LES had a myotomy of the LES with partial fundoplication. Outcome was assessed as follows: excellent if the patient was asymptomatic; good if symptoms were present but no treatment was required; fair if symptoms were present and required treatment; and poor if symptoms were unimproved or worsened. All patients were contacted by telephone for symptom assessment at a median of 3.6 years (range 3 to 6.1 years) after surgery. Patients with hypertensive LES and GERD or type III hiatal hernia had significantly lower LES pressure than those with isolated hypertensive LES (29.9 vs. 47.4 mm Hg; P = 0.013). Dysphagia and chest pain were relieved in all patients at long-term follow up. Outcome was excellent in 10 of 16, good in 3 of 16, and fair in 3 of 16. All patients but one were satisfied with their outcome. Patients with hypertensive LES are a heterogeneous group in regard to symptoms and etiology. Treatment of patients with hypertensive LES should be individualized. A Nissen fundoplication for hypertensive LES with GERD or type III hiatal hernia relieves dysphagia and chest pain suggesting reflux as an etiology. A myotomy with partial fundoplication for isolated hypertensive LES relieves dysphagia and chest pain suggesting a primary sphincter dysfunction. Presented at the Forty-Fourth Annual Meeting of The Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, Orlando, Florida, May 17–22, 2003.     

Current status of an antireflux procedure in laparoscopic Heller myotomy

BACKGROUND: Persistent dysphagia and postoperative gastroesophageal reflux (GER) are the most cited reasons for surgical failure of laparoscopic Heller myotomy. Adding an antireflux procedure to Heller myotomy has been proposed to prevent reflux. We hypothesized that an antireflux procedure added to laparoscopic Heller myotomy has little effect on preventing the symptoms or long-term sequelae of GER in achalasia patients. METHODS: We performed a meta-analysis of studies on human subjects reported in the English language literature from 1991 to 2001 years. RESULTS: An antireflux procedure accompanied laparoscopic myotomy in 15 studies with 532 patients. In 6 studies of 69 patients, no antireflux procedure was added to laparoscopic myotomy. Follow-up was available on 489 patients (92%) with partial fundoplication. The rate of GER diagnosed in pH studies was 7.9% (18 of 228 patients studied), whereas only 5.9% of patients experienced symptoms of GER (29 of 489 patients followed). Of the 69 patients without fundoplication, 47 (68%) were available for follow-up. Forty patients (85%) were studied with pH monitoring postoperatively, with 4 (10%) demonstrating reflux. Six (13%) of 47 patients had symptoms of GER. The difference in the rate of GER diagnosed in postmyotomy pH studies in wrapped and nonwrapped patients was not significant (7.9 vs 10%, respectively; p = 0.75). There was also no significant difference in the incidence of postmyotomy GER symptoms in wrapped and nonwrapped patients (5.9 vs 13% respectively; p = 0.12). CONCLUSIONS: Reflux is not necessarily eliminated with the addition of a partial fundoplication. Based on the published data, recommendations cannot be made regarding the efficacy of adding an antireflux procedure to laparoscopic Heller myotomy. Prospective randomized study is needed to clarify the role of an antireflux procedure after laparoscopic Heller myotomy.     

Very long-term objective evaluation of heller myotomy plus posterior partial fundoplication in patients with achalasia of the cardia

OBJECTIVE: To present the objectively assessed very long-term results of a prospective study of 149 patients with achalasia of the cardia who underwent Heller myotomy and posterior partial fundoplication. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Very few studies evaluate objectively the very long-term results to analyze whether the effectiveness of Heller myotomy is maintained with the passing of time. METHODS: The study group consisted of 149 patients who underwent a Heller myotomy plus a posterior partial fundoplication through a laparotomy. The median follow-up was 6 years (range, 1-27 years). Follow-up period was over 10 years in 53 patients and over 15 in 36. Clinical, radiologic, endoscopic, manometric, and pHmetric evaluations were performed postoperatively. RESULTS: Satisfactory results were higher than 90% up to 5 years. From that time on results gradually decreased to a 75% rate after 15 years (P < 0.001) due to either heartburn or dysphagia. Both the esophageal diameter and the mean resting pressure of the lower esophageal sphincter decreased postoperatively with no significant changes during follow-up. Esophagitis appeared in 11% of the patients (47% of them being asymptomatic) and 24-hour pH monitoring showed pathologic rates of acid reflux in 14% of patients, 58% of them being asymptomatic. Both esophagitis and pathologic rates of reflux appeared in >40% of the patients late in the follow-up. CONCLUSION: Results after Heller myotomy plus posterior partial fundoplication deteriorate with time, although we achieved a 75% of satisfactory results after >15 years of follow-up. Our study highlights the importance of life long follow-up and the objective assessment of the results.     

Reflux Control Following Myotomy in Diffuse Esophageal Spasm

Sixty-five patients with diffuse esophageal spasm (DES) were investigated by history, radiology, manometry, and endoscopy prior to surgical management. At operation they underwent extended myotomy to the apex of the chest, including the high-pressure zone; in addition, all had hiatal hernia repair. Four types of repair were used: the Belsey procedure, partial fundoplication gastroplasty, total fundoplication gastroplasty, and the Nissen procedure.With the Belsey or the partial fundoplication, there was a high incidence of continued reflux. With the total fundoplication procedure, there was no reflux; however, 6 patients had minor dysphagia and 1 had major dysphagia. With myotomy and a standard Nissen fundoplication, 13 patients were asymptomatic and 2 had minor dysphagia; none had major residual symptoms.     

Functional results after laparoscopic Heller myotomy for achalasia: A comparative study to open surgery

BACKGROUND: Prospective studies comparing laparoscopic to open Heller myotomy for esophageal achalasia are lacking. The aim of this study was to compare functional outcome after laparoscopic and open Heller myotomy for esophageal achalasia. METHODS: Eighty-two patients who underwent Heller-Dor myotomy for achalasia, via laparoscopy (n=52) or open surgery (n=30) were recorded prospectively (1993-2002). Median follow-up was 51 (12-111) months. Perioperative functional data were assessed via dysphagia and overall clinical (dysphagia, chest pain, regurgitation, gastroesophageal reflux) scores. RESULTS: In laparoscopy patients, the operative time was longer (145 [95-290] vs 120 [70-230] minutes, P <.0001); the postoperative hospital stay and feeding resumption time was shorter (4 [2-25] vs 7.5 [5-18] days, P <.0001 and 2 [1-15] vs 4 [1-14] days, P <.0001). Three mucosal tears necessitated conversion to open surgery (6%). The rates of " excellent" or " satisfactory" results after laparoscopic and open surgery were 92% (n=48/52) versus 93% (n=28/30), and 83% (n=43/52) versus 83% (n=25/30) on overall clinical score. In both groups, the overall clinical score indicated significant improvement during 12-month follow-up. The laparoscopy and open surgery symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux rates were 10% and 7%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic Heller myotomy favorably compares with open surgery regarding dysphagia relief and gastroesophageal reflux rate. Overall clinical score indicates gradual improvement in patient functional status during 12-month follow-up.     

Operative interventions for failed heller myotomy: a single institution experience

Recurrent dysphagia and/or gastroesophageal reflux (GER) are failures of treatment after Heller myotomy for achalasia. We present our single center experience with surgical interventions for these failures. We did a retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database. Based on preoperative symptoms and endoscopy, esophagogram, and manometry results, patients were divided into three groups to guide management. Telephone follow-up was done using a structured foregut questionnaire. Between December 2003 and June 2009, 16 patients underwent operative interventions for disabling symptoms after previous Heller myotomy. Eight patients presented primarily with recurrent dysphagia and underwent transabdominal Heller myotomy with partial fundoplication. Seven patients reported good to excellent symptom relief at mean follow-up of 42 months. One patient reported no relief and eventually required esophageal bypass with retrosternal gastric pull-up. Four patients presented with uncontrolled GER. Two patients who underwent redo partial fundoplication reported poor symptomatic outcome and one patient has since undergone short limb Roux-en-y gastric bypass (SLRNYGB) with excellent symptom relief. The other two patients underwent SLRNYGB with excellent relief at 10 months. Four patients had end stage achalasia and underwent esophageal resection with reconstruction. All reported excellent symptom relief at mean follow-up of 36 months. Transabdominal redo Heller myotomy for dysphagia has good outcomes. Redo fundoplication for GER after previous myotomy has poor results and SLRNYGB is an effective option in these patients. Esophageal resection remains an effective, albeit morbid, option for end-stage achalasia.     

Minimally invasive surgery for achalasia: A 10-year experience

Minimally invasive esophagomyotomy for achalasia has become the preferred surgical treatment; the employment of a concomitant fundoplication with the myotomy is controversial. Here we report a retrospective analysis of 53 patients with achalasia treated with laparoscopic Heller myotomy; fundoplication was used in all patients except one, and 48 of the fundoplications were complete (floppy Nissen). There were no deaths or reoperations, and minor complications occurred in three patients. Good-to-excellent long-term results were obtained in 92% of the subjects (median follow-up 3 years). Two cases (4%) of persistent postoperative dysphagia were documented, one of which was treated with dilatation. Postoperative reflux occurred in five patients, four of whom did not receive a complete fundoplication; these patients were well controlled with medical therapy. We suggest that esophageal achalasia may be successfully treated with laparoscopic Heller myotomy and floppy Nissen fundoplication with an acceptable rate of postoperative dysphagia. Presented at the Forty-Fourth Annual Meeting of The Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, Orlando, Florida, May 18–21, 2003 (poster presentation).     

Prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux after laparoscopic Heller myotomy

Background: There is still some controversy over the need for antireflux procedures with Heller myotomy in the treatment of achalasia. This study was undertaken in an effort to clarify this question. Methods: To determine whether Heller myotomy alone would cause significant gastroesophageal reflux (GER), we studied 16 patients who had undergone laparoscopic Heller myotomy without concomitant antireflux procedures. Patients were asked to return for esophageal manometry and 24-h pH studies after giving informed consent for the Institutional Review Board (IRB)-approved study at a median follow-up time of 8.3 months (range, 3–51). Results are expressed as the mean ± SEM. Results: Fourteen of the 16 patients reported good to excellent relief of dysphagia after myotomy. They were subsequently studied with a 24-h pH probe and esophageal manometry. These 14 patients had a significant fall in lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure from 41.4 ± 4.2 mmHg to 14.2 ± 1.3 mmHg, after the myotomy (p < 0.01, Student's t-test). The two patients who reported more dysphagia postoperatively had LES pressures of 20 and 25 mmHg, respectively. Two of 14 patients had DeMeester scores of >22 (scores = 61.8, 29.4), while only one patient had a pathologic total time of reflux (percent time of reflux, 8%). The mean percent time of reflux in the other 13 patients was 1.9 ± 0.6% (range, 0.1–4%), and the mean DeMeester score was 11.7 ± 4.6 (range, 0.48–19.7). Conclusions: Laparoscopic Heller myotomy is effective for the relief of dysphagia in achalasia if the myotomy lowers the LES pressure to <17 mmHg. If performed without dissection of the entire esophagus, the laparoscopic Heller myotomy does not create significant GER in the postoperative period. Clearance of acid refluxate from the aperistaltic esophagus is an important component of the pathologic gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) seen after Heller myotomy for achalasia. Furthermore, GERD symptoms do not correlate with objective measurement of GE reflux in patients with achalasia. Objective measurement of GERD with 24 h pH probes may be indicated to identify those patients with pathologic acid reflux who need additional medical treatment. Received: 12 May 1998/Accepted: 15 December 1998     

Physiologic assessment and surgical management of diffuse esophageal spasm.

The physiologic abnormalities and management of patients with diffuse esophageal spasm are controversial. We evaluated the symptomatic and functional results of surgical therapy in 19 patients with diffuse esophageal spasm who were incapacitated with dysphagia and chest pain and unresponsive to conservative management. A long esophageal myotomy with an antireflux procedure was performed in 15 patients, and four patients with multiple previous esophageal procedures had an esophagectomy. Eleven patients had increased esophageal exposure to gastric juice on preoperative 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring. The severity of dysphagia, chest pain, regurgitation, and heartburn was scored on a scale of 0 to 3 before and a mean of 24 months (range 8 months to 13 years) after the operation. After myotomy, each of these symptoms and the overall symptom score improved significantly (p < 0.01). The improvement in the symptom scores in the patients who had esophagectomy were comparable with the improvement after myotomy. On self-assessment, 90% of the patients would have the operation again if again faced with the decision. Standard and ambulatory 24-hour manometry showed a significant reduction in the amplitude of the esophageal body contractions, a decrease in the frequency of simultaneous contractions, and the elimination of multi-peaked waves after the myotomy. Despite the addition of an antireflux procedure, lower esophageal sphincter pressure, overall length, and abdominal length were reduced markedly after the myotomy. This was associated with persistent or emerging heartburn or regurgitation in four patients. These data indicate that a long esophageal myotomy is a valid treatment alternative in appropriately selected patients with diffuse esophageal spasm. Esophagectomy and colon interposition is the procedure of choice in patients with multiple previously failed myotomies.