High-dose epirubicin,preceded by dexrazoxane,given in combination with paclitaxel plus filgrastim provides an effective mobilizing regimen to support three courses of high-dose dense chemotherapy in patients with high-risk stage II-IIIA breast cancer

Summary:We verified the possibility of collecting large amounts of peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) to support three courses of adjuvant high-dose dense chemotherapy (HDDC) with high-dose epirubicin, preceded by dexrazoxane, and high-dose paclitaxel, in patients with high-risk breast cancer (>/=9 positive nodes). The mobilizing regimen consisted of high-dose epirubicin 150 mg/m(2), preceded by dexrazoxane 1000 mg/m(2) (day 1), given in combination with paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2) (day 2), plus filgrastim. Of the 25 patients enrolled, one went off study due to a severe hypersensitivity reaction to paclitaxel, another did not undergo leukapheresis due to fever persistent after hematological recovery, while in 23 patients an adequate number of PBSCs was collected by a single leukapheresis. The median number of CD34+, CD34+/CD33-, and CD34+/CD38- cells collected per patient was 17 x 10(6)/kg, 13.4 x 10(6)/kg, and 1.5 x 10(6)/kg, respectively. Neutropenia was the only grade 4 toxicity and lasted a median of 3 days. High-dose epirubicin, preceded by dexrazoxane for the first time used in mobilizing regimen, and paclitaxel plus filgrastim are effective in releasing large amounts of PBSCs, which can then be safely employed to support multiple courses of HDDC.     

Ifosfamide in combination with paclitaxel or doxorubicin: regimens which effectively mobilize peripheral blood progenitor cells while demonstrating anti-tumor activity in patients with metastatic breast cancer

For patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) who undergo high-dose therapy with autologous peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) transplantation, an important prerequisite is a mobilization regimen that efficiently mobilizes PBPCs while producing an effective anti-tumor effect. We prospectively evaluated ifosfamide-based chemotherapy for mobilization efficiency, toxicity and disease response in 37 patients. Patients received two cycles of the ifosfamide-based regimen; ifosfamide (5 g/m2 with conventional-dose cycle and 6 g/m2 with mobilization cycle) with either 50 mg/m2 doxorubicin (if limited prior anthracycline and/or progression more than 12 months after an anthracycline-based regimen) or 175 mg/m2 paclitaxel. For the mobilization cycle, all patients received additional G-CSF (10 microg/kg SC, daily) commencing 24 h after completion of chemotherapy. The target yield was >6x10(6) CD34+ cells/kg, sufficient to support the subsequent three cycles of high-dose therapy. The mobilization therapy was well tolerated and the peak days for peripheral blood (PB) CD34+ cells were days 10-13 with no significant differences in the PB CD34+ cells mobilization kinetics between the ifosfamide-doxorubicin vs. ifosfamide-paclitaxel regimens. The median PBPC CD34+ cell content ranged from 2.9 to 4.0x10(6)/kg per day during days 9-14. After a median of 3 (range 1-5) collection days, the median total CD34+ cell, CFU-GM and MNC for all 44 individual sets of collections was 9.2x10(6)/kg (range 0.16-54.9), 37x10(4)/kg (range 5.7-247) and 7.3x10(8)/kg (range 2.1-26.1), respectively. The PBPC target yield was achieved in 35 of the 37 patients. The overall response rate for the 31 evaluable patients was 68% with 10% having progressive disease. Thirty-three patients have subsequently received high-dose therapy consisting of three planned cycles of high-dose ifosfamide, thiotepa and paclitaxel with each cycle supported with PBPCs. Rapid neutrophil and platelet recovery has been observed. Ifosfamide with G-CSF in combination with doxorubicin or paclitaxel achieves effective mobilization of PBPC and anti-tumor activity with minimal toxicity.     

An analysis of engraftment kinetics as a function of the CD34 content of peripheral blood progenitor cell collections in 692 patients after the administration of myeloablative chemotherapy

The CD34 antigen is expressed by committed and uncommitted hematopoietic progenitor cells and is increasingly used to assess stem cell content of peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) collections. Quantitative CD34 expression in PBPC collections has been suggested to correlate with engraftment kinetics of PBPCs infused after myeloablative therapy. We analyzed the engraftment kinetics as a function of CD34 content in 692 patients treated with high-dose chemotherapy (HDC). Patients had PBPCs collected after cyclophosphamide based mobilization chemotherapy with or without recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rhG-CSF) until > or = 2.5 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg were harvested. Measurement of the CD34 content of PBPC collections was performed daily by a central reference laboratory using a single technique of CD34 analysis. Forty-five patients required a second mobilization procedure to achieve > or = 2.5 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg and 15 patients with less than 2.5 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg available for infusion received HDC. A median of 9.94 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg (range, 0.5 to 112.6 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg) contained in the PBPC collections was subsequently infused into patients after the administration of HDC. Engraftment was rapid with patients requiring a median of 9 days (range, 5 to 38 days) to achieve a neutrophil count of 0.5 x 10(9)/L and a median of 9 days (range, 4 to 53+ days) to achieve a platelet count of > or = 20 x 10(9)/L. A clear dose-response relationship was evident between the number of CD34+ cells per kilogram infused between the number of CD34+ cells per kilogram infused and neutrophil and platelet engraftment kinetics. Factors potentially influencing the engraftment kinetics of neutrophil and platelet recovery were examined using a Cox regression model. The single most powerful mediator of both platelet (P = .0001) and neutrophil (P = .0001) recovery was the CD34 content of the PBPC product. Administration of a post-PBPC infusion myeloid growth factor was also highly correlated with neutrophil recovery (P = .0001). Patients receiving high-dose cyclophosphamide, thiotepa, and carboplatin had more rapid platelet recovery than patients receiving other regimens (P = .006), and patients requiring 2 mobilization procedures versus 1 mobilization procedure to achieve > or = 2.5 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg experienced slower platelet recovery (P = .005). Although a minimal threshold CD34 dose could not be defined, > or = 5.0 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg appears to be optimal for ensuring rapid neutrophil and platelet recovery.     

High-dose chemotherapy and CD34-selected peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation for patients with breast cancer metastatic to bone and/or bone marrow.

Fifty women with breast cancer metastatic to bone or bone marrow involvement on light microscopy at the time of initial evaluation were treated with high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) and peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) transplantation with CD34(+) cell selection using the Isolex 300i system. All patients received induction chemotherapy. PBPC were mobilized with chemotherapy and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor. The median CD34(+) progenitor purity was 94.7% (range 72-98.7%) and recovery 38.4% (range 21-60%). Forty-eight hours after HDC with cyclophosphamide, cisplatin and carmustine, PBPC were reinfused. Median time to neutrophil count >0.5 x 10(9)/l was 9 (range 9-12) days and to platelet transfusion independence 11 (4-30) days. These data demonstrate that selected CD34(+) PBPCs allow rapid hematologic reconstitution after HDC. During follow-up, 23% of patients developed herpes zoster. Two patients developed cytomegalovirus infections. Three patients developed fungal infections. The development of these infections was not associated with steroid use but appeared more frequently in patients with diabetes mellitus. Seventy-four per cent of patients received steroids for pulmonary toxicity. Treatment-related mortality was 4%. Progression-free survival and overall survival at 35 months was 22.4% and 40.5%, with a median of 11.4 months and 15.4 months, respectively.     

Post-operative sequential high-dose chemotherapy with haematopoietic stem cell support as front-line treatment in advanced ovarian cancer: a phase II multicentre study

In spite of multimodal management including aggressive surgery and chemotherapy, the prognosis of advanced ovarian cancer (AOC) remains poor. Multicycle high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) with haematopoietic stem cell (HSC) support has been shown to be a promising procedure in various cancers including AOC. We conducted a phase II multicentre study to evaluate feasibility, toxicity and efficacy of post-operative front-line sequential HDC with HSC support in AOC. Thirty four patients with stage IIIC/IV received a post-operative sequential combination of high-dose cyclophosphamide/epirubicin (D1, D21) with HSC harvesting, high-dose carboplatin (D42, D98) followed by HSC infusion, and dose-dense paclitaxel (D63, D77, D119, D133). Rh-G-CSF (filgrastim) was administered following all cycles. Primary endpoint was pathological complete response rate (pCR). Thirty patients received at least 7 of the scheduled 8 cycles. Haematological toxicity was significant but manageable. Grade 3/4 extra-haematopoietic toxicities were relatively uncommon and reversible. No toxicity-related death was observed. The observed pCR was 37% and did not reach the initial endpoint. Post-operative front-line sequential HDC in AOC is feasible and safe in a multicentre setting. The observed pCR does not support a clear advantage over conventional treatment. This approach remains an experimental strategy to further optimise and validate.     

Hemopoietic Recovery and Infectious Complications in Breast Cancer and Multiple Myeloma after Autologous CD34<Superscript>+</Superscript> Cell-Selected Peripheral Blood Progenitor Cell Transplantation

Autografting with CD34+ cell-selected peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) is often associated with a prolonged recovery time and a higher incidence of infections. The aim of our study was to evaluate whether underlying disease influences hemopoietic recovery and the infectious complications occurring after transplantation. We studied 19 breast cancer (BC) patients and 17 multiple myeloma (MM) patients entered in a high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) program of tandem autografting with CD34+ cell-selected PBPC. PBPC were collected after mobilizing chemotherapy plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and were processed for selection of CD34+ cells. After selection, a median of 53% CD34+ cells was recovered with a median final purity of 92% with no significant differences between the MM (52% and 92%, respectively) and BC (53% and 89%, respectively) patients. Medians of 4.5 x 10(6)/kg CD34+ cells (BC, 4.4 x 10(6)/kg; MM, 5.4 x 10(6)/kg) and 18 x 10(4)/kg colony-forming units-granulocyte-macrophage (BC, 21 x 10(4)/kg: MM, 16 x 10(4)/kg) were reinfused after each HDC. Twenty-six patients (10 MM and 16 BC) underwent tandem autografting, and 10 patients received only 1 autograft because of inadequate collection (5 patients), clinical condition (3 patients), and refusal (2 patients). In the BC patients, the HDC regimen included a high-dose melphalan course followed by an ICE (ifosfamide, carboplatin, and etoposide) course. In the MM patients, the regimen consisted of a course of high-dose melphalan therapy and a course of ICBV (idarubicin, cyclophosphamide [Cytoxan], BCNU, and etoposide) or total body irradiation, etoposide, and Cytoxan. We found a significantly prolonged time for neutrophil recovery to > 500/microL in the MM patients (13 days versus 10 days; P < .002), whereas the times for platelet recovery to > 20,000/microL in the two groups were not different (13 days versus 12 days; not significant). No late engraftment failures and no toxic deaths were observed. The incidences of extrahematologic toxicity were similar for the two patient groups. All patients received similar anti-infection prophylaxis for 3 months after transplantation. After 12 months of observation, we found a statistically significant higher incidence of bacterial infections in MM patients in both the early (77.8% versus 48.6%; P < .034) and the late (41.1% versus 0%; P < .014) posttransplantation periods, whereas the incidences of fungal infections were similar in the two groups. Viral infections consisted of herpes zoster virus infection in 2 patients of each group, and cytomegalovirus infection was observed in 3 MM patients and no BC patients. Our experience demonstrates a prolonged neutrophil recovery time and higher incidences of bacterial and viral infections in MM patients compared with BC patients. These observations, although limited by the small sample size, suggest that the underlying disease may influence the incidence of infections after CD34- cell-selected transplantation and should be considered in the planning of appropriate antimicrobial prophylaxis in the autologous transplantation setting.     

Cyclophosphamide and paclitaxel as initial or salvage regimen for the mobilization of peripheral blood progenitor cells

Peripheral blood progenitor cells are now commonly used for hematologic reconstitution after myelosuppressive chemotherapy for hematologic and solid malignancies. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the activity of paclitaxel 170 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 2 g/m2 (CP) with filgrastim (human G-CSF) for mobilization of PBPCs as the first or second maneuver after failure with filgrastim alone. Sixty-four patients with stage II-IV breast cancer received (CP) followed by filgrastim (10 microg/kg/day). In 35 (55%) this was the first maneuver while it was for salvage in 29 (45%) patients. The median number of aphereses was two (range, 1-7). In 83% of the patients apheresis was initiated on days 10-11 following chemotherapy. The median numbers of CD34+ cells/kg, CD34+ cells/apheresis/kg and total nucleated cells/kg collected were 8.7 x 10(6) (2.11-73.5), 3.97 x 10(6) (0.3-36.75) and 164.15 x 10(8) (9-660), respectively. All the patients yielded at least 2 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg. CP mobilization salvaged the 29 patients who failed mobilization with filgrastim alone. When used as first-line mobilization the yield of CD34+ cells x 10(6)/kg was higher than in the salvage group (16.93 vs 3.94, P < 0.001). Patients receiving CP as salvage reached the target of 5 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg in only 45% (13/29) of cases vs 94.3% as first maneuver. CP followed by filgrastim is a safe and effective regimen for the mobilization of PBPCs in patients with breast cancer and shows significant activity in patients who failed to mobilize with filgrastim, suggesting a higher mobilization potential.     

Patient characteristics associated with successful mobilizing and autografting of peripheral blood progenitor cells in malignant lymphoma

For patients with advanced-stage or poor-prognosis malignant lymphoma, high-dose therapy with peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) support may become a first-line treatment. The duration of severe cytopenia in this setting is inversely related to the number of PBPCs autografted. In a retrospective analysis, we therefore looked for factors influencing the yield of PBPCs in 61 patients (16 with high-grade and 29 with low-/intermediate-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma [NHL], and 16 with Hodgkin's disease) who received cytotoxic chemotherapy and filgrastim (R-metHuG-CSF, 300 micrograms/d; median, 4.2 micrograms/kg/d; range, 2.7 to 6.6 micrograms/kg/d; subcutaneously). Sixteen patients had active disease, while 45 were in partial remission (PR) or complete remission (CR) after conventional therapy. A median of three leukaphereses (range, one to 10) resulted in a median of 5.7 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg (range, 0.03 to 31.1 x 10(6)). Previous cytotoxic chemotherapy and irradiation adversely affected the yield of CD34+ cells. Each cycle of chemotherapy is associated with an average decrease of 0.2 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg per leukapheresis in nonirradiated patients, while large-field radiotherapy reduces the collection efficiency by an average of 1.8 x 10(6)/kg CD34+ cells. The collection efficiency was also significantly lower in patients with Hodgkin's disease. However, except for one, all had been previously irradiated. In contrast, age, sex, disease status, bone marrow involvement during mobilization, and the time since the last chemotherapy or radiotherapy were not significantly related to the collection efficiency. Following high-dose conditioning therapy, 42 patients were autografted with filgrastim-mobilized PBPCs. Hematological recovery (neutrophils > or = 0.5 x 10(9)/L and an unsupported platelet count > or = 20 x 10(9)/L) within 2 weeks was observed in patients autografted with > or = 2.5 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg. In seven patients, the quantity of CD34+ cells reinfused was below this threshold. They required a median of 17 days (range, 11 to 34) and 31 days (range, 13 to 141) for neutrophil and platelet recovery, respectively. If autografting with PBPCs in malignant lymphoma with poor prognosis is being considered, mobilization and harvesting should be planned early after initial diagnosis to avoid exhaustion of hematopoiesis by cumulative toxicity.     

Positively selected autologous blood CD34+ cells and unseparated peripheral blood progenitor cells mediate identical hematopoietic engraftment after high-dose VP16, ifosfamide, carboplatin, and epirubicin

To investigate the feasibility of peripheral blood CD34+ cell selection and to analyze CD34+ cell-mediated engraftment after high-dose chemotherapy, we performed a phase I/II trial in 21 patients with advanced malignancies. The rationale for the selection of CD34+ cells from peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) collections is based on the observation that contaminating tumor cells can be depleted approximately 3 logs using this procedure. CD34+ cells from chemotherapy+granulocyte colony-stimulating factor-mobilized PBPCs were positively selected with an avidin-biotin immunoadsorption column (CEPRATE SC system). One leukapheresis product with a median number of 2.8 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg was labeled with a biotinylated anti-CD34 monoclonal antibody and subsequently processed over the column. The yield of selected CD34+ cells was 73% +/- 24.6%. The purity of the CD34+ cell fraction was 61.4% +/- 19.7%. CD34+ cells were shown to represent predominantly committed progenitors coexpressing CD33, CD38, and HLA-DR molecules (lin+). They gave rise to myeloid as well as erythroid and multilineage colonies in vitro. In addition, positively selected CD34+ cells also comprised early hematopoietic progenitor cells, as shown by the presence of CD34+/lin- cells. Transfusion of positively selected CD34+ cells (2.5 x 10(6) CD34+/kg; range, 0.45 to 5.1) after high-dose VP16 (1,500 mg/m2), ifosfamide (12 g/m2), carboplatin (750 mg/m2), and epirubicin (150 mg/m2) (VIC-E) in 15 patients resulted in a rapid and stable engraftment of hematopoiesis without any adverse events. As compared with 13 historical control patients reconstituted with a comparable number of unseparated PBPCs, time to neutrophil and platelet recovery was identical in both groups (absolute neutrophil count > 500/microL, day + 12; platelet count > 50,000/microL, day + 15). These data indicate that autologous peripheral blood CD34+ cells and unseparated PBPCs mediate identical reconstitution of hematopoiesis after high-dose VIC-E chemotherapy. Because positive selection of CD34+ cells from mobilized blood results in a median 403-fold depletion of T cells, allogeneic CD34+ cells from mobilized blood should be investigated as an alternative to bone marrow cells for allotransplantation.     

Cytotoxic chemotherapy preceding apheresis of peripheral blood progenitor cells can affect the early reconstitution phase of naive T cells after autologous transplantation

Transient T cell immunodeficiency is a common complication following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. In breast cancer patients transplanted with autologous peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) harvested after cytotoxic treatment with either cyclophosphamide or epirubicin plus paclitaxel, we evaluated T cells infused in grafts and in peripheral blood during the early reconstitution phase. We found that PBPC grafts harvested after treatment with epirubicin plus paclitaxel contained substantially larger numbers of T cells with less altered composition than after cyclophosphamide. Three months after high-dose cytotoxic chemotherapy, the numbers and the kinetics of circulating naive T cells, but not of memory and CD28- T cells, correlated positively with the number of naive T cells infused PBPC grafts. Finally, retrospective analysis of two cohorts of patients transplanted in different clinical settings with PBPC grafts harvested following cyclophosphamide or epirubicin plus paclitaxel showed apparently different susceptibilities to develop endogenous varicella zoster virus reactivation in the first year after high-dose cytotoxic chemotherapy. On the whole, these data indicate that number and composition of T cells in PBPC grafts vary according to the former cytotoxic therapy, and suggest that autologous transfer of T cells may accelerate the early T cell reconstitution phase and possibly ameliorate immune competence in patients rendered lymphopenic by high-dose chemotherapy.     

High-dose chemotherapy with peripheral blood progenitor cell support for patients with non-small cell lung cancer: the experience of the European Group for Bone Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) Solid Tumours Working Party

We report the experience of the EBMT Solid Tumours Working Party (STWP) using high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) with PBPC support in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Between 1989 and 2004, 36 NSCLC patients (27 men and 9 women), median age 53.5 years (range: 24-62) were treated with 63 HDCT courses. A high-dose carboplatin-based regimen was used in 53% of the cases. Thirty-two patients had relapsed/metastatic disease, while four classified as stage IIIB received HDCT followed by radiotherapy. No treatment-related death occurred. Of 25 patients who were planned to receive multi-cycle HDCT, 4 cases (16%) interrupted the treatment early due to prolonged severe toxicities and 4 (16%) due to progressive disease. Of 36 evaluable patients, 3 (8%) achieved a complete remission and 13 (36%) had a partial remission at an overall response rate of 44%. Of these, one patient with stage IIIB and one with stage IV are alive disease free at 71+ and 149+ months, respectively. After a median follow-up of 48 months (range: 6-149), median survival was 7 months (range: 1-149). Despite one anecdotal case, HDCT did not show significant activity, but induced relevant morbidity in NSCLC patients.     

Mobilization of tumor cells and hematopoietic progenitor cells into peripheral blood of patients with solid tumors [see comments]

Peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPCs) are increasingly used for autografting after high-dose chemotherapy. One advantage of PBPCs over the use of autologous bone marrow would be a reduced risk of tumor-cell contamination. However, the actual level of tumor cells contaminating PBPC harvests is poorly investigated. It is currently not known whether mobilization of PBPCs might also result in mobilization of tumor cells. We evaluated 358 peripheral blood samples from 46 patients with stage IV or high-risk stage II/III breast cancer, small cell (SCLC) or non- small cell (NSCLC) lung cancer, as well as other advanced malignancies for the detection of epithelial tumor cells. Monoclonal antibodies against acidic and basic cytokeratin components and epithelial antigens (HEA) were used in an alkaline phosphatase-anti-alkaline phosphatase assay with a sensitivity of 1 tumor cell within 4 x 10(5) total cells. Before initiation of PBPC mobilization, circulating tumor cells were detected in 2/7 (29%) patients with stage IV breast cancer and in 2/10 (20%) patients with extensive-disease SCLC, respectively. In these patients, an even higher number of circulating tumor cells was detected after chemotherapy with VP16, ifosfamide, and cisplatin (VIP) followed by granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF). This approach has previously been shown to be highly effective in mobilizing PBPCs. In the 42 patients without circulating tumor cells during steady state, tumor cells were mobilized in 9/42 (21%) patients after VIP+G-CSF induced recruitment of PBPCs. The overall incidence of tumor cells varied between 4 and 5,600 per 1.6 x 10(6) mononuclear cells analyzed. All stage IV breast cancer patients and 50% of SCLC patients were found to concomitantly mobilize tumor cells and PBPCs. Kinetic analyses showed two patterns of tumor cell recruitment depending on the presence or absence of bone marrow disease: (1) early after chemotherapy (between days 1 and 7) in patients without marrow infiltration, and (2) between days 9 and 16 in patients with marrow infiltration, ie, within the optimal time period for the collection of PBPCs. We show that there is a high proportion of patients with circulating tumor cells under steady-state conditions, and in addition a substantial risk of concomitant tumor cell recruitment upon mobilization of PBPCs, particularly in stage IV breast cancer patients with bone marrow infiltration. The biologic and clinical significance of this finding is unknown at present.     

Ex vivo expansion of CD34+ peripheral blood progenitor cells: implications for the expansion of contaminating epithelial tumor cells

Cytokine-supported ex vivo expansion of peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPCs) offers new perspectives for autografting after high-dose chemotherapy. One of the potential advantages is the possibility to reduce the volume of blood processed from the patient, thus allowing reduction of the overall tumor cell number in the final autograft. However, ex vivo expansion will only be advantageous if contaminating tumor cells are not expanded concomitantly. This question has not previously been addressed. Therefore, we analyzed unseparated PBPC preparations, CD34(+)-selected cell fractions, and ex vivo-expanded cell preparations from stage IV (n = 16) and high-risk stage II/III (n = 8) breast cancer patients for the presence of human epithelial antigen- (HEA) or cytokeratin (CK)-positive tumor cells. We found that three of 16 (18.8%) of the unseparated PBPC products from stage IV patients were HEA- and/or CK-positive, whereas none of the stage II/III patients were found to be positive after two cycles of induction chemotherapy with etoposide (VP16), ifosfamide, cisplatin, and epirubicin (VIP-E). After CD34+ cell selection (Ceprate SC; CellPro, Bothell, WA) and stem-cell factor (SCF), interleukin (IL)-1, IL-3, IL- 6, and erythropoietin (EPO)-mediated ex vivo expansion of the CD34+ cells for 14 to 21 days, no tumor cells could be detected in these primary breast cancer patients at a sensitivity of 1 tumor cell per 4 x 10(5) nucleated cells. Thus, to answer the question of whether tumor cells are expanded concomitantly on ex vivo expansion of normal CD34+ cells, we cocultured defined numbers of primary renal carcinoma cells (RS-85), xenograft-derived breast cancer cells, and small-cell lung cancer cells with CD34+ cells selected from normal donors or cancer patients, either in serum or serum-free culture media. We found that none of the three epithelial tumor cell types increased significantly in number during a 14-day coculture period when compared with normal CD34+ cells alone or tumor cells alone, which increased 110- +/- 77- fold and 45- +/- 26-fold, respectively. However, during coculture, the tumor cells did not undergo cell death and were able to regrow when maintained in serum for longer time periods. We conclude that cytokine- supported expansion cultures of positively selected CD34+ PBPCs from primary high-risk stage II/III or stage IV breast cancer patients do not contain detectable tumor cells, which suggests that there is no increased risk of concomitantly expanding tumor cells. Moreover, cocultures of exogenously mixed tumor cell lines with normal CD34+ cells showed a relative disadvantage of tumor cell growth compared with the growth of hematopoietic cells, again without an apparent risk of concomitantly expanding tumor cells. However, considering the pronounced heterogeneity of tumor cell kinetics, ex vivo-expanded PBPC from cancer patients should be monitored for minimal residual disease.     

Sequential cycles of high-dose chemotherapy with dose escalation of carboplatin with or without paclitaxel supported by G-CSF mobilized peripheral blood progenitor cells: a phase I/II study in advanced ovarian cancer

To assess high-dose carboplatin chemotherapy with or without paclitaxel with filgrastim mobilized peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) support in a phase I/II study, a total of 21 patients with mostly chemonaive disease received four cycles of high-dose chemotherapy. Cycle 1 (cyclophosphamide, 6 g/m2) was followed by two cycles of carboplatin (1600 mg/m2 or 1800 mg/m2). Cycle 4 consisted of carboplatin (1600 mg/m2), etoposide (1600 mg/m2), and melphalan (140 mg/m2). Further chemotherapy intensification was achieved by adding paclitaxel (175 mg/m2) to all cycles with a fixed carboplatin dose (1600 mg/m2). Ototoxicity was dose-limiting for escalation of sequential cycles of carboplatin. Grade 2 and grade 3 ototoxicity, hearing loss not requiring a hearing aid, or hearing loss correctable with a hearing aid, was observed with carboplatin at 1800 mg/m2. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of sequential carboplatin, therefore, was identified in this study as 1600 mg/m2. After cycles 1, 2, 3 and 4 the median duration of leukopenia (<1.0x10(9)/l) was 7, 4, 4 and 6 days. Severe grade 3 and 4 infections were seen in only 7% of cycles. Of the 21 patients evaluable for disease response, 57% had complete remissions and 43% experienced partial remissions resulting in an overall response rate of 100%. The median progression-free survival is 25 (15-36) months, the median overall survival 36.5 (15-38) months. Most patients were suboptimally debulked or had bulky residual disease at the start of chemotherapy. Sequential high-dose chemotherapy to a maximum dose of 1600 mg/m2 carboplatin is effective and feasible. A randomized, prospective trial comparing sequential high-dose chemotherapy with optimal standard chemotherapy is now warranted.     

CD34+-selected peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation in patients with multiple myeloma: tumour cell contamination and outcome

Thirty-six patients with multiple myeloma (23 PR1, nine PR2, four stable disease) were entered into a pilot study evaluating the use of CD34+-selected peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation (PBPCT) following high-dose melphalan alone or high-dose melphalan and total body irradiation. Peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPCs) were mobilized with cyclophosphamide and granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF). CD34+ selection using the Cellpro Ceprate-SC system was performed in 22 cases with an adequate yield in 20. 10 patients failed to mobilize sufficient cells to permit selection and in four cases selection was not performed for other reasons. 16 patients therefore received unselected PBPC. Tumour cell contamination was evaluated by IgH gene fingerprinting (fpPCR). Harvested PBPC were fpPCR positive in 13/20 CD34+-selected cases and remained positive after selection in seven. Harvested PBPC were studied in 9/16 patients receiving unselected cells; fpPCR was positive in five and negative in four. There was no difference in event-free survival (EFS) between the CD34+-selected group and the unselected group (median 21 and 26 months, respectively, P=ns). The CD34+-selection process therefore reduced contamination but did not eliminate it completely, and in this small non-randomized study there was no apparent clinical benefit of CD34+ selection.     

Prolonged CD4 depletion after sequential autologous peripheral blood progenitor cell infusions in children and young adults

Administration of mobilized peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPCs) after high-dose chemotherapy rapidly restores multilineage hematopoiesis, but the ability of such products to restore lymphocyte populations remains unclear. In this report, we evaluated immune reconstitution in a series of patients treated with sequential cycles of high-dose chemotherapy, followed by autologous PBPC infusions (median CD34(+) cell dose 7.2 x 10(6) cells/kg [range 2-29.3]). Although patients experienced rapid reconstitution of B cells and CD8(+) T cells, we observed CD4 depletion and diminished immune responsiveness in all patients for several months after completion of therapy. Mature CD4(+) T cells contained within the grafts did not appear to contribute substantially to immune reconstitution because CD4 counts did not differ between recipients of unmanipulated T-cell replete infusions versus CD34 selected, T-cell-depleted infusions. Rather, at 12 months after therapy, total CD4 count was inversely proportional to age (rho = -0.78, P =.04), but showed no relationship to CD34 cell dose (rho = -0.42, P =.26), suggesting that age-related changes within the host are largely responsible for the limited immune reconstitution observed. These results demonstrate that in the autologous setting, the infusion of large numbers of PBPCs is not sufficient to restore T-cell immune competence and emphasize that specific approaches to enhance immune reconstitution are necessary if immune-based therapy is to be used to eradicate minimal residual disease after autologous PBPC transplantation. (Blood. 2000;96:754-762)     

Selection and expansion of peripheral blood CD34+ cells in autologous stem cell transplantation for breast cancer

Cytopenia after high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell reinfusion is a major cause of morbidity. Ex vivo cultured expansion and differentiation of CD34+ peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) to neutrophil precursors may shorten the neutropenic period further. We explored the use of these ex vivo cultured PBPCs in nine patients with metastatic breast cancer. All underwent PBPC mobilization with cyclophosphamide, VP-16, and G-CSF. Subsequently, they underwent four to five apheresis procedures. One apheresis product from each patient was prepared using the Isolex 300 Magnetic Cell Separation System (Baxter Immunotherapy, Irvine, CA) to obtain CD34+ cells. These cells were then cultured in gas permeable bags containing serum-free X-VIVO 10 (BioWhittaker, Walkersville, MD) medium supplemented with 1% human serum albumin and 100 ng/mL PIXY321. At day 12 of culture the mean fold expansion was 26x with a range of 6 to 64x. One patient's cells did not expand because of a technical difficulty. The final cell product contained an average of 29.3% CD15+ neutrophil precursors with a range of 18.5% to 48.1%. The patients underwent high-dose chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, carboplatin, and thiotepa. On day 0, the cryopreserved PBPCs were reinfused and on day +1 the 12-day cultured cells were washed, resuspended, and reinfused into eight of nine patients. One patient was not infused with cultured cells. The mean number of cultured cells reinfused was 44.6 x 10(6) cells/kg with a range of 0.8 to 156.6 x 10(6) cells/kg. No toxicity was observed after reinfusion. The eight patients have recovered absolute neutrophil counts > 500/microL on a median of 8 days (range 8 to 10 days); the median platelet transfusion independence occurred on day 10 (range 8 to 12 days) and platelet counts > 50,000/microL were achieved by day 12 (range 9 to 14) for the seven patients whose platelet counts could be determined. Expanded CD34+ selected PBPC can be obtained and safely reinfused into patients.     

Influence of amifostine on reconstitution of lymphocyte subpopulations after conventional- and high-dose chemotherapy in patients with germ cell tumor

We assessed the influence of amifostine on immune reconstitution after conventional-dose paclitaxel, ifosfamide, cisplatin and high-dose carboplatin, etoposide and thiotepa followed by autologous peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) rescue in patients with germ cell tumor (GCT). A total of 40 patients were treated with one cycle of paclitaxel and ifosfamide (TI) followed by granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) to mobilize PBPC, three cycles of paclitaxel, ifosfamide and cisplatin (TIP) and one course of high-dose carboplatin, etoposide and thiotepa (CET) plus PBPC rescue. Patients were randomized to receive an absolute dose of 500 mg amifostine (group A, n=20) on each day of chemotherapy or no amifostine (group B, n=20). Prior to each cycle of chemotherapy, after hematologic engraftment from CET, 6 weeks and 3 months after transplantation the subpopulations of lymphocytes were phenotyped. Between the two study groups no statistically significant differences were observed concerning reconstitution of lymphocyte subpopulations. Throughout treatment with TIP or CET lymphocyte counts and their subpopulations remained low without severe clinical complications. Delayed reconstitution of the CD4(+) cell compartment after PBPC rescue was observed in both study groups, but did not result in any severe or atypical infections. Treatment with amifostine administered at this dose did not significantly influence the reconstitution of lymphocyte subpopulations. Low numbers of lymphocytes during chemotherapy and delayed reconstitution of CD4(+) cells and other lymphocyte subpopulations after PBPC rescue had no clinical relevance for patients with GCT.     

A randomized phase 2 study of PBPC mobilization by stem cell factor and filgrastim in heavily pretreated patients with Hodgkin's disease or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

This randomized, controlled study compared the ability to mobilize and collect an optimal target yield of 5 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg using stem cell factor (SCF; 20 microg/kg/day) plus filgrastim (G-CSF; 10 microg/kg/day) vs filgrastim alone (10 microg/kg/day) in 102 patients diagnosed with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) or Hodgkin's disease (HD), who were prospectively defined as being heavily pretreated. Leukapheresis began on day 5 of cytokine administration and continued daily until the target yield was reached, or until a maximum of five leukaphereses had been performed. Compared with the filgrastim-alone group (n = 54), the SCF plus filgrastim group (n = 48) showed an increase in the proportion of patients reaching the target yield within five leukaphereses (44% vs 17%, P = 0.002); reduction in the number of leukaphereses required to reach the target yield (P = 0.003); reduction in the proportion of patients failing to reach a minimum yield of 1 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg to proceed to transplant (16% vs 26%, P = NS); increase in the median yield of CD34+ cells per leukapheresis (0.73 x 10(6)/kg vs 0.48 x 10(6)/kg, P = 0.04); and an increase in the median total CD34+ cells collected within five leukaphereses (3.6 x 10(6)/kg vs 2.4 x 10(6)/kg, P = 0.05). All patients receiving SCF were premedicated (antihistamines and albuterol), and treatment was generally well tolerated. Five patients experienced severe mast cell-mediated reactions, none of which were life-threatening. In this study of heavily pretreated lymphoma patients, SCF plus filgrastim was more effective than filgrastim alone for mobilizing PBPC for harvesting and transplantation after high-dose chemotherapy.     

Optimizing dose and scheduling of filgrastim (granulocyte colony- stimulating factor) for mobilization and collection of peripheral blood progenitor cells in normal volunteers [see comments]

To define an optimal regimen for mobilizing and collecting peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) for use in allogeneic transplantation, we evaluated the kinetics of mobilization by filgrastim (recombinant met- human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor [r-metHuG-CSF]) in normal volunteers. Filgrastim was injected subcutaneously for up to 10 days at a dose of 3 (n = 10), 5 (n = 5), or 10 micrograms/kg/d (n = 15). A subset of volunteers from each dose cohort underwent a 7L leukapheresis on study day 6 (after 5 days of filgrastim). Granulocyte-macrophage colony-forming cell (GM-CFC) numbers in the blood were maximal after 5 days of filgrastim; a broader peak was evident for CD34+ cells between days 4 and 6. The 95% confidence intervals (CI) for mean number of PBPC per milliliter of blood in the three dose cohorts overlapped on each study day. However, on the peak day, CD34+ cells were significantly higher in the 10 micrograms/kg/d cohort than in a pool of the 3 and 5 micrograms/kg/d cohorts. Mobilization was not significantly influenced by volunteer age or sex. Leukapheresis products obtained at the 10 micrograms/kg/d dose level contained a median GM-CFC number of 93 x 10(4)/kg (range, 50 x 10(4)/kg to 172 x 10(4)/kg). Collections from volunteers receiving lower doses of filgrastim contained a median GM- CFC number of 36 x 10(4)/kg (range, 5 x 10(4)/kg to 204 x 10(4)/kg). The measurement of CD34+ cells per milliliter of blood on the day of leukapheresis predicted the total yield of PBPC in the leukapheresis product (r = .87, P < .0001). Assuming a minimum GM-CFC requirement of 50 x 10(4)/kg (based on our experience with autologous PBPC transplantation), all seven leukapheresis products obtained at the 10 micrograms/kg/d dose level were potentially sufficient for allogeneic transplantation purposes. We conclude that in normal donors, filgrastim 10 micrograms/kg/d for 5 days with a single leukapheresis on the following day is a highly effective regimen for PBPC mobilization and collection. Further studies are required to determine whether PBPC collected with this regimen reliably produce rapid and sustained engraftment in allogeneic recipients.