ADP-induced platelet aggregation frequently fails to detect impaired clopidogrel-responsiveness in patients with coronary artery disease compared to a P2Y12-specific assay

Incomplete P2Y(12)-inhibition during clopidogrel treatment is associated with increased cardiovascular events and mortality after coronary intervention. We investigated the incidence of impaired individual clopidogrel-responsiveness using a P2Y(12)-specific and pre-treatment-independent assay in a real world situation. One hundred consecutive patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) on combined acetylsalicylic acid and clopidogrel treatment (75 mg/d) and 33 patients on aspirin only were screened for platelet ADP-induced signalling by conventional aggregometry, platelet P-selectin expression and the platelet reactivity index (PRI). Impaired P2Y(12)-specific inhibition by clopidogrel was defined as a PRI>50%. Functional platelet reactivity was significantly lower in clopidogrel-treated patients compared to controls. Impaired individual response to treatment was diagnosed in 69% of clopidogrel-treated patients. Conventional assessment of maximum ADP-induced platelet aggregation failed to detect impaired P2Y(12) inhibition in 36% of patients identified by PRI to have an impaired clopidogrel response. Impaired clopidogrel response was associated with lower HDL levels and a history of hyperlipidaemia. In conclusion, PRI as a P2Y(12)-specific assay to evaluate the treatment effect of clopidogrel in patients with CAD revealed insufficient P2Y(12)-inhibition in two thirds of patients in a real-world scenario indicating a markedly higher incidence than previously assumed. PRI detected significantly more patients with impaired response than conventional platelet aggregation.     

Role of the T744C polymorphism of the P2Y12 gene on platelet response to a 600-mg loading dose of clopidogrel in 597 patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome

BACKGROUND: Variability in platelet response to clopidogrel and its clinical relevance have been well described. However, the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. Recently, the T744C polymorphism of the P2Y12 receptor gene has been associated with enhanced platelet aggregation in healthy volunteers, suggesting a possible mechanism for modulation of clopidogrel response. AIM OF THIS STUDY: To assess whether the clopidogrel response may be influenced by the T744C P2Y12 gene polymorphism in patients with non ST elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE ACS). METHODS: 597 NSTE ACS patients were included in our study and were divided into 3 groups: CC homozygotes, CT heterozygotes ad TT homozygotes. All patients received loading doses of 600 mg clopidogrel and 250 mg aspirin at least 12 hours before blood samples. Clopidogrel response was assessed by post-treatment ADP 10 micromol/L-induced platelet aggregation (ADP-Ag), VASP phosphorylation (PRI VASP) and P-selectin expression (PS). Clopidogrel resistance was defined by persistence of High Post-treatment Platelet Reactivity (HPPR=ADP-Ag>70%). RESULTS: Significant variability in the distribution of platelet parameters was observed in the overall study population. No significant difference in platelet parameter profiles was observed within patients having the same genotype, for ADP-Ag (p=0.39), PRI VASP (p=0.97) and PS (p=0.62). The genotype frequencies of the T744C polymorphism of the P2Y12 gene were similar in responders and non responders defining by HPPR (p=0.75). CONCLUSION: Our study did not show any influence of the T744C polymorphism of the P2Y12 receptor gene on clopidogrel response assessed by ADP-Ag, PRI VASP or P-selectin expression in NSTE ACS patients.     

Lack of association between the P2Y12 receptor gene polymorphism and platelet response to clopidogrel in patients with coronary artery disease

INTRODUCTION: Clopidogrel inhibits the ADP subtype P2Y(12) receptor. Recently, polymorphisms of this receptor have been associated with different degrees of platelet aggregation in healthy volunteers and have been suggested to modulate clopidogrel response. However, the role of gene sequence variations of the P2Y(12) receptor in patients treated with clopidogrel has not yet been assessed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The T744C polymorphism of the P2Y(12) receptor gene was assessed in 119 patients: 36 undergoing coronary stenting receiving a 300 mg loading dose (Group A) and 83 on long-term clopidogrel (75 mg/day) treatment (Group B). Patients were divided into 2 subgroups according to the presence or absence of the C allele: carriers (CT heterozygotes and CC homozygotes) and non-carriers (TT homozygotes). Platelet aggregation, assessed by light transmittance aggregometry following ADP, collagen, TRAP and epinephrine stimuli, and platelet activation (GP IIb/IIIa activation and P-selectin expression), assessed by whole blood flow cytometry in ADP and TRAP-stimulated platelets, were performed. Platelet function was assessed at baseline and 4 and 24 h following clopidogrel loading dose in Group A and when patients where on clopidogrel treatment for at least 1 month in Group B. RESULTS: The genotype distribution of Group A was: 22/36 (61.1%) non-carriers and 14/36 (38.9%) carriers of the C allele; Group B: 57/83 (68.7%) non-carriers and 26/83 (31.3%) carriers of the C allele. There were no differences between groups for all the assessed platelet function assays. CONCLUSIONS: The T744C polymorphism of the P2Y(12) receptor gene does not modulate platelet response to clopidogrel either in the early or long-term phases of treatment. This specific gene polymorphism alone is therefore unlikely to be the cause of variability in individual response to antiplatelet therapy.     

Inhibition of ADP-induced P-selectin expression and platelet-leukocyte conjugate formation by clopidogrel and the P2Y12 receptor antagonist AR-C69931MX but not aspirin

Platelet-leukocyte interactions are recognised to have pro-inflammatory effects, which may be important in the pathophysiology of ischaemic heart disease. Clopidogrel and the novel intravenous antithrombotic agent AR-C69931MX act at the level of the platelet P2Y12 receptor, which is known to amplify platelet activation, aggregation and other responses induced by numerous platelet agonists. We studied the effects of clopidogrel and aspirin on ADP-induced platelet-leukocyte conjugate formation and P-selectin expression in healthy volunteers. The effects of clopidogrel and AR-C69931MX administered to patients with ischaemic heart disease were also assessed. AR-C69931MX and aspirin were also studied in vitro. Clopidogrel and AR-C69931MX suppressed ADP-induced platelet aggregation, P-selectin expression and platelet-leukocyte conjugate formation whereas aspirin had no inhibitory effect. These effects of clopidogrel and AR-C69931MX may confer therapeutic benefits in the management of acute coronary syndromes.     

Novel P2Y12 adenosine diphosphate receptor antagonists for inhibition of platelet aggregation (II): pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic characterization

Antiplatelet drugs are used to prevent aberrant platelet activation in pathophysiologic conditions such as myocardial infarction and ischemic stroke. The key role that ADP plays in this process has led to the development of antiplatelet drugs that target the P2Y12 receptor. The aim of this study was to characterize the pharmacodynamic (PD) and pharmacokinetic (PK) properties of the novel P2Y12 receptor antagonists, BX 667 and BX 048. BX 667 blocks ADP-induced platelet aggregation in human, dog and rat blood (IC50=97, 317 and 3000 nM respectively). BX 667 had nominal effects on collagen-induced aggregation and weakly inhibited arachidonic acid-induced aggregation. BX 667 has an active metabolite, BX 048, that also potently inhibits ADP-induced aggregation (IC50=290 nM) in human blood. BX 667 was shown to have high oral bioavailability in both dog and rat unlike BX 048. Administration of BX 667 resulted in a rapid and sustained inhibition of platelet aggregation where the extent and duration of platelet inhibition was directly proportional to circulating plasma levels. This report describes the PK/PD properties of BX 667 showing that it has the properties required for a potential antiplatelet therapeutic agent.     

Monitoring platelet inhibition after clopidogrel with the VerifyNow-P2Y12(R) rapid analyzer: the VERIfy Thrombosis risk ASsessment (VERITAS) study

INTRODUCTION: Clopidogrel inhibits platelet P2Y12 ADP receptors, while ADP, as an inductor of aggregation, stimulates both P2Y12 and P2Y1 platelet receptors. Despite a clinical loading dose routine with clopidogrel, some patients still experience coronary stent thrombosis suggesting persistent platelet activation. The VerifyNow-P2Y12 is a rapid assay that test platelet activity over 3 min and uses of the combination of ADP and prostaglandin E1 (PGE1) to directly measure the effects of clopidogrel on the P2Y12 receptor. ADP is used to maximally activate the platelets by binding to the P2Y1 and P2Y12 platelet receptors, while PGE1 is used to suppress the ADP-induced P2Y1-mediated increase in intracellular calcium levels. OBJECTIVE: The VERIfy Thrombosis risk ASsessment (VERITAS) was a prospective study designed to measure platelet response to clopidogrel therapy in subjects with multiple risk factors or history of vascular disease using this novel point-of-care assay. METHODS: 166 participants were enrolled in 4 participating sites. Data from 147 participants were analyzed after exclusion of 19 patients due to protocol violations. Platelets were assessed twice at baseline (before clopidogrel) and at 24 h post-loading 450 mg (110 participants) or 7 days after chronic clopidogrel treatment (75 mg/day) (37 patients). All participants received aspirin 81-325 mg for at least 2 days before the study enrollment. Results from the VerifyNow-P2Y12 assay are reported in P2Y12 reaction units (PRU). RESULTS: Clopidogrel therapy resulted in a mean 64.0+/-25.3% PRU reduction. No participant reached PRU inhibition below 10% of baseline. Distribution of PRU values for the VerifyNow-P2Y12 assay shows a separation from baseline to post-clopidogrel assay values with some overlap due to high inter-individual variations in response. CONCLUSIONS: VerifyNow-P2Y12 is a reliable, fast and sensitive device suitable for monitoring of platelet inhibition during clopidogrel therapy.     

A novel P2Y(12) adenosine diphosphate receptor antagonist that inhibits platelet aggregation and thrombus formation in rat and dog models

Irreversible platelet inhibitors, such as aspirin and clopidogrel, have limited anti-thrombotic efficacy in the clinic due to their bleeding risk. We have developed an orally active reversible P2Y(12) receptor antagonist, BX 667. The aim of this study was to determine if the reversible antagonist BX 667 had a greater therapeutic index than the irreversible P2Y(12) receptor antagonist clopidogrel. Since BX 667 is rapidly converted to its active metabolite BX 048 in rats, we first injected BX 048 intravenously (iv) in a rat arterial venous (A-V) shunt model of thrombosis. BX 048 dose- and concentration-dependently attenuated thrombosis. When administered orally, BX 667 and clopidogrel had similar efficacy, but BX 667 caused less bleeding than clopidogrel. In a rat model of a platelet-rich thrombus induced by vessel injury with FeCl(2), both BX 667 and clopidogrel exhibited higher levels of thrombus inhibition after oral administration compared to their potency in the A-V shunt model. Again, BX 667 caused less bleeding than clopidogrel. In a dog cyclic flow model, iv injection of either BX 667 or clopidogrel dose-dependently reduced thrombus formation with lower bleeding for BX 667 than clopidogrel. Inhibition of thrombosis was highly correlated with inhibition of ADP-induced platelet aggregation in these animal models. In dogs pre-treated with aspirin, BX 667 maintained its wider therapeutic index, measured by inhibition of platelet aggregation over bleeding, compared to the aspirin-clopidogrel combination. These data demonstrate that the reversible P2Y(12) receptor antagonist, BX 667, has a wider therapeutic index than clopidogrel in experimental models of thrombosis.     

Potentiation of platelet aggregation by heparin in human whole blood is attenuated by P2Y12 and P2Y1 antagonists but not aspirin

INTRODUCTION: Unfractionated heparin (UFH) potentiates platelet aggregation induced by some agonists. P2Y12 and P2Y1 receptors play a major role in amplifying platelet aggregation. We assessed the ability of cangrelor, a selective P2Y12 antagonist, A2P5P, a selective P2Y1 antagonist, and aspirin to block the potentiating effects of heparin. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Whole blood from healthy human volunteers was anticoagulated with either hirudin or UFH 10 IU/ml. Some tubes anticoagulated with hirudin also contained UFH 1 or 10 IU/ml. The low-molecular-weight heparin dalteparin was also assessed. Platelet aggregation was performed using whole blood single-platelet counting. Dense granule release was assessed using 14C-5HT-labelled platelets. RESULTS: UFH and, to a lesser extent, dalteparin potentiated platelet aggregation induced by ADP, PAF, 5HT, U46619, epinephrine and TRAP in a concentration-dependent manner but inhibited aggregation induced by collagen. Cangrelor effectively opposed the potentiating effects of heparins on sustained aggregation induced by ADP, PAF, 5HT, U46619 and TRAP but had less effect on epinephrine-induced aggregation, whereas A2P5P was more effective at blocking both the initial phase of ADP-induced aggregation and the aggregation response to epinephrine, reflecting the differences in G protein coupling between the agonist receptors. Aspirin had no effect on potentiation by heparin. Heparins did not increase ADP- or TRAP-induced 14C-5HT release. CONCLUSIONS: Heparins potentiate platelet responses to ADP and numerous other agonists. This potentiation is attenuated by cangrelor and A2P5P, and is not mediated by increased dense granule release. ADP receptor antagonists but not aspirin may have potential therapeutic benefits in counteracting the pro-thrombotic effects of heparins.     

The additive antiplatelet action of clopidogrel in patients with coronary artery disease treated with aspirin

We searched for additional anti-platelet effects of clopidogrel in coronary artery disease (CAD) patients treated with aspirin. Response to clopidogrel was also stratified according to aspirin resistance. Out of 76 screened aspirin-treated CAD male patients, five were aspirin-resistant based on arachidonic acid (AA) and ADP aggregometry. These five patients and 15 aspirin-sensitive patients entered the proper study. Platelet function was assessed at baseline and after one week of additional clopidogrel treatment using aggregometry, flow cytometry (ADP, TRAP-6) and platelet reactivity index (PRI) based on VASP (vasodilatorstimulated phosphoprotein) expression. We evaluated the same markers in 15 healthy men after aspirin treatment. In healthy subjects aspirin did not affect resting or ADP-induced activated GPIIb/IIIa and P-selectin expression. The P-selectin expression on ADP-activated platelets was increased (p < 0.01) in aspirin treated ASA-resistant CAD patients as compared to ASA-sensitive group or aspirin-treated healthy subjects. Clopidogrel significantly decreased ADP and AA-induced platelet aggregation and overcame aspirin resistance in four of five patients. Expression of ADP-induced activation markers was significantly lowered after clopidogrel in all patients. Out of 20 patients, five did not respond to clopidogrel (<10% inhibition of ADP aggregation), and this group showed no change in expression of ADP-induced activation markers after clopidogrel. Clopidogrel treatment significantly reduced PRI only in the clopidogrel-sensitive group. In conclusion, the addition of clopidogrel to aspirin provides greater inhibition of platelets and can overcome aspirin resistance. Flow cytometric analysis of platelets is useful for monitoring of clopidogrel therapy.     

Variable responsiveness to clopidogrel and aspirin among patients with acute coronary syndrome as assessed by platelet function tests

Unresponsiveness to clopidogrel or aspirin has been reported in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Platelet aggregometry (PA) and the Impact-R [Cone and Plate(let) Analyzer (CPA) technology, measuring whole blood platelet adhesion under flow conditions] were compared in detecting laboratory unresponsiveness to clopidogrel and aspirin among ACS patients. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) samples were evaluated in 404 patients by PA using adenosine diphosphate (ADP) and arachidonic acid (AA) and whole blood samples by the Impact-R ADP- and AA-response tests. The first cohort (n=114) was assayed by PA on days 1 and 4 of the onset of ACS. A patient with relative decrease of /=70%. A patient with an absolute value of AA-induced maximal aggregation >/=60% was defined as laboratory NR patient to aspirin. The second cohort (n=290) was tested on day 4 by both systems and results analyzed by receiver operating characteristic curve. The following cut-off values of the Impact-R surface coverage were obtained: 相似文献   

The use of the VerifyNow P2Y12 point-of-care device to monitor platelet function across a range of P2Y12 inhibition levels following prasugrel and clopidogrel administration

Variability in response to antiplatelet agents has prompted the development of point-of-care (POC) technology. In this study, we compared the VerifyNow P2Y12 (VN-P2Y12) POC device with light transmission aggregometry (LTA) in subjects switched directly from clopidogrel to prasugrel. Healthy subjects on aspirin were administered a clopidogrel 600 mg loading dose (LD) followed by a 75 mg/d maintenance dose (MD) for 10 days. Subjects were then switched to a prasugrel 60 mg LD and then 10 mg/d MD for 10 days (n = 16), or to a prasugrel 10 mg/d MD for 11 days (n = 19). Platelet function was measured by LTA and VN-P2Y12 at baseline and after dosing. Clopidogrel 600 mg LD/75 mg MD treatment led to a reduction in P2Y(12) reaction units (PRU) from baseline. A switch from clopidogrel MD to prasugrel 60 mg LD/10 mg MD produced an immediate decrease in PRU, while a switch to prasugrel 10 mg MD resulted in a more gradual decline. Consistent with the reduction in PRU, device-reported percent inhibition increased during both clopidogrel and prasugrel regimens. Inhibition of platelet aggregation as measured by LTA showed a very similar pattern to that found with VN-P2Y12 measurement, irrespective of treatment regimens. The dynamic range of VN-P2Y12 appeared to be narrower than that of LTA. With two different thienopyridines, the VN-P2Y12 device, within a somewhat more limited range, reflected the overall magnitude of change in aggregation response determined by LTA. The determination of the clinical utility of such POC devices will require their use in clinical outcome studies.     

Inhibitory Effects of P2Y12 Receptor Antagonist on PAR1- and PAR4-AP-Induced Platelet Aggregation in Patients with Stroke or TIA

ObjectivesThe inhibitory effects of P2Y12 receptor antagonist on PAR1- and PAR4-activating peptide (AP)-induced platelet aggregation have not been fully elucidated. The present study aimed to investigate the inhibitory effects of P2Y12 receptor antagonist on PAR1- and PAR4-AP-induced platelet aggregation using platelet-rich plasma (PRP) from individuals including patients with stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA).Materials and MethodsPRP was given to 10 healthy individuals pretreated in vitro with cangrelor, then stimulated with adenosine diphosphate (ADP), PAR4-AP, or PAR1-AP. Moreover, 20 patients were enrolled from 148 consecutive patients with acute ischemic stroke or TIA admitted to our institute between December 2017 and April 2019. PRP obtained from each patient before and >7 days after initiation of clopidogrel was similarly stimulated with these agonists. Platelet aggregation was measured using an automatic coagulation analyzer in all participants.ResultsIn healthy individuals, ADP- and PAR4-AP-induced platelet aggregations were significantly inhibited depending on the cangrelor concentration in vitro, while PAR1-AP-induced platelet aggregation was slightly inhibited. In patients with stroke or TIA, clopidogrel inhibited ADP-induced platelet aggregation at all concentrations, and significantly inhibited PAR4-AP-induced platelet aggregation at 50 µmol/L of PAR4-AP (p<0.05), especially in 5 patients who showed high reactivity to PAR4-AP. PAR1-AP-induced platelet aggregation was also slightly inhibited.ConclusionsWe showed significant inhibitory effects on PAR4-AP-induced platelet aggregation by clopidogrel in patients with stroke or TIA who had high reactivity to PAR4-AP.     

P2Y12 platelet reactivity after thrombolytic therapy for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

Introduction

Thrombolysis, as reperfusion therapy for ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), induces a pro-thrombotic status with enhanced platelet activity; this study aims to evaluate P2Y12 platelet reactivity and response to clopidogrel in the post-thrombolysis scenario.

Materials and Methods

Observational, prospective study, including consecutive patients with elective angiography after thrombolytic therapy for STEMI. Every patient received antiplatelet therapy with loading doses of 250 mg aspirin and 300 mg clopidogrel on admission followed by 100 mg aspirin and 75 mg clopidogrel daily. P2Y12-dependent platelet reactivity (expressed in P2Y12-Reaction Units, PRU) was assessed with VerifyNow® device on admission, daily after thrombolysis and pre-angiography.

Results

41 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Median time between thrombolysis and angiography was 2,5 days (IQR 1,8-4,1). Post-treatment platelet reactivity (PPR) showed poor correlation with time on clopidogrel treatment (r2 = 0.04) and reached a maximum value of 274 ± 84 PRU during the first 24 h after thrombolysis (Day + 1 determination). After this, values showed a progressive reduction until the point of angiography (249 ± 82 PRU), without significant differences between consecutive time-points (p = 0,549).Inhibition of platelet aggregation (IPA) assessed as a percentage of P2Y12 receptor blockage was poor, increasing gradually from 0 ± 4% on admission to 11 ± 6% the day of the angiography (p = 0,001). 71,4% of patients showed PPR ≥ 208 PRU during angiography.

Conclusions

Platelet reactivity, as assessed by post-treatment P2Y12 mediated reactivity, is heightened after thrombolytic therapy during STEMI management. In this scenario, standard doses of clopidogrel did not achieve significant inhibition of ADP-mediated platelet reactivity.     

Genetic determinants of response to aspirin: appraisal of 4 candidate genes

Introduction

Intersubject variability in platelet response to aspirin could be related to genetic factors that regulate platelet enzymes or receptors. This study evaluates the impact of the selected polymorphisms in the COX-1 gene, the CYP5A1 gene, the P2RY1 receptor gene, and the GPIIbIIIa receptor gene on platelet response to aspirin and risk of suffering from major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE).

Materials and methods

192 Caucasian patients with stable coronary artery disease treated with daily aspirin were recruited and followed for 3 years. Platelet aggregation was measured by light transmission aggregometry with arachidonic acid (1.6 mM) and adenosine diphosphate (5, 10 or 20 μM) used as agonists. Genotyping was performed by standard PCR methods.

Results

Arachidonic acid-induced platelet aggregation was unaffected by the COX-1 22C/T and by the Pl^A1/A2 polymorphisms. However, carriers of the 1622 G/G genotype of the P2RY1 gene had significantly higher levels of arachidonic acid-induced platelet aggregation compared with non-carriers (AA 2.0%, AG 2.0% vs. GG 9.0%, p = 0.047). Carrying the 1622 G/G genotype increased the risk of inadequate platelet response to aspirin, defined as arachidonic acid-induced aggregation ≥ 20%, by a factor of 8.5 (1.4 - 53.3, p = 0.022) and the risk of 3-year MACCE by a factor of 7 (1.4 - 34.7, p = 0.017).

Conclusion

The 1622A/G mutation of the P2RY1 gene could contribute to inadequate platelet response to aspirin and is associated with an increased risk of suffering from MACCE.     

The prothrombin gene G20210A mutation and the platelet glycoprotein IIIa polymorphism PlA2 in patients with central retinal vein occlusion

The prothrombin gene G20210A mutation and the platelet glycoprotein IIIa polymorphism PlA2 have been shown to be associated with thromboembolic disease. We wondered if mutations were overrepresented in patients with central retinal vein occlusion. We studied 129 consecutive patients with a history of central retinal vein occlusion. We analysed for the prothrombin gene G20210A mutation and the platelet glycoprotein IIIa polymorphism PlA2 and compared the results to controls with no history of thrombosis. For the platelet glycoprotein IIIa polymorphism PlA2, 69% were normal, 26% were heterozygous, and 5% were homozygous. For the G20210A prothrombin mutation, 97% were normal and 3% were heterozygous. Neither the prothrombin gene G20210A mutation nor the platelet glycoprotein IIIa polymorphism PlA2 seem to be associated with central retinal vein occlusion.     

Intrinsic platelet reactivity before P2Y12 blockade contributes to residual platelet reactivity despite high-level P2Y12 blockade by prasugrel or high-dose clopidogrel. Results from PRINCIPLE-TIMI 44

It was the objective of this study to determine whether the intrinsic platelet response to adenosine diphosphate (ADP) before thienopyridine exposure contributes to residual platelet reactivity to ADP despite high level P2Y12 blockade by prasugrel (60 mg loading dose [LD]), 10 mg daily maintenance dose [MD]) or high-dose clopidogrel (600 mg LD, 150 mg daily MD). High residual platelet function during clopidogrel therapy is associated with poor clinical outcomes. It remains unknown whether the relationship between platelet reactivity prior to treatment with clopidogrel (300 mg LD, 75 mg daily MD) and residual on-treatment platelet reactivity is maintained after more potent P2Y12 inhibition. PRINCIPLE-TIMI 44 was a randomised, double-blind, two-phase crossover study of prasugrel compared with high-dose clopidogrel in 201 patients undergoing cardiac catheterisation for planned percutaneous coronary intervention. ADP-stimulated platelet-monocyte aggregates, platelet surface P-selectin and platelet aggregation were measured pre-treatment, during LD (6 h and 18-24 h) and MD (15 d). Correlations of pre-treatment to on-treatment values were determined by Spearman rank order. Prasugrel resulted in greater platelet inhibition than high-dose clopidogrel for each measure. However, for both drugs, pre-treatment reactivity to ADP predicted 6 h, 18-24 h and 15 day reactivity to ADP (correlations 0.24-0.62 for platelet-monocyte aggregates and P-selectin). In conclusion, a patient's intrinsic platelet response to ADP before exposure to thienopyridines contributes to residual platelet reactivity to ADP despite high level P2Y12 blockade with high-dose clopidogrel or even higher level P2Y12 blockade with prasugrel. Patients who are hyper-responsive to ADP pre-treatment are more likely to be hyper-responsive to ADP on-treatment, which may be relevant to therapeutic strategies.     

The P2Y1 receptor is normal in a patient presenting a severe deficiency of ADP-induced platelet aggregation.

ADP is a key stimulus inducing platelet shape change and aggregation, a rise in internal calcium and inhibition of adenylyl cyclase. These signaling pathways are thought to be activated by three independent receptors, but to date only the P2Y1 receptor responsible for calcium mobilization and the ionotropic P2X1 receptor have been identified. We report here the characteristics of the P2Y1 receptor in a patient presenting a selective deficiency of ADP-induced aggregation. Cloning of the P2Y1 gene revealed that the patient's DNA and mRNA were normal. Pharmacological studies showed that the P2Y1 receptor was expressed and functional in patient's platelets. Hence, the P2Y, receptor is not the cause of the impaired ADP-induced platelet aggregation in this patient. The P2X1 mRNA was also found to be present and normal. These findings add evidence to previous observations suggesting that a third P2 receptor coupled to adenylyl cyclase may be involved in ADP-induced platelet aggregation.     

Anti-thrombotic action of clopidogrel and P1(A1/A2) polymorphism of beta3 integrin in patients with coronary artery disease not being treated with aspirin

Individual variability in response to clopidogrel is known but its mechanism is poorly understood. We examined the relationship between glycoprotein IIIa polymorphism P1(A1/A2) and anti-thrombotic actions of clopidogrel. Clopidogrel (75 mg/d; 2 weeks) was administered to 48 normolipemic patients with coronary artery disease. Bleeding time, thrombin generation at the site of microvascular injury, platelet function under high shear, using PFA-100 with ADP cartridge, and platelet surface activation markers (P-selectin and fibrinogen binding sites on GPIIb/IIIa complex detected by PAC-1 antibody), were studied both before and after clopidogrel treatment. Both unstimulated and low-dose (0.02 microM and 1 microM) in vitro ADP-stimulated platelets were examined. GP IIIa polymorphism was assessed by polymerase chain reaction and restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis. We identified 32 P1(A1/A1) homozygotes, 15 P1(A1/A2 heterozygotes and one P1(A2/A2) homozygote. Clopidogrel significantly prolonged bleeding time in all subjects, but this effect was greater in P1(A2 carriers (p < 0.01). Furthermore, clopidogrel only depressed thrombin generation at the site of microvascular injury (p < 0.01) in P1(A2) patients and prolonged closure time measured in vitro by PFA-100 (p < 0.05).At baseline spontaneous expression of PAC-1 and P-selectin was higher in P1(A2) subjects as compared to P1(A1) homozygotes (p < 0.05 for both antigens). Clopidogrel lowered the expression of both markers affecting more P1(A2) carriers, so that the difference in binding PAC-1 antibody between platelets from P1(A1) and P1(A2) carriers disappeared, while the difference in P-selectin expression slightly diminished. Anti-thrombotic effects of clopidogrel are more pronounced in CAD patients carrying the P1(A2) allele than in P1(A1) homozygotes.     

Effect of clopidogrel treatment on stress-induced platelet activation and myocardial ischemia in aspirin-treated patients with stable coronary artery disease

Stress may counteract responses to antiplatelet drug treatment. We investigated if adding clopidogrel to aspirin treatment could attenutate stress-induced platelet activation and myocardial ischemia in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). Thirty-one male patients with documented CAD-treated with aspirin (75-160 mg daily) were randomized to co-treatment with clopidogrel (n = 16) or placebo (n = 15). A symptom-limited exercise test and 48-hour (h) Holter monitoring were performed before and after two weeks of double-blind treatment. Platelet function was assessed by flow cytometry and impedance aggregometry in whole blood. Exercise-induced and ambulatory ischemia was assessed from electrocardiographic (ECG) recordings. Clopidogrel treatment inhibited ADP-induced platelet P-selectin expression by 64% (22-87%), and attenuated the P-selectin response to thrombin (p < 0.001), and platelet aggregation induced by low-dose collagen (p < 0.01). Exercise ( approximately 110W) increased heart rate similarly, and caused approximately 1.8 mm ST-segment depression both before and after treatment. Exercise caused platelet activation, i.e. increased circulating activated single platelets and platelet-platelet aggregates, enhanced the in-vitro responsiveness to ADP or thrombin stimulation, and increased platelet-leukocyte aggregation. Clopidogrel inhibited ADP-induced platelet activation to a similar relative degree at rest and during exercise, but did not attenuate the platelet activating effect of exercise. Addition of clopidogrel to aspirin treatment did not attenuate either ambulatory or exercise-induced ischemia. In conclusion, adding clopidogrel to aspirin treatment inhibited platelet activation by both ADP, thrombin and collagen in vitro, but did not influence the prothrombotic responses to exercise. Intensified antiplatelet treatment did not reduce ECG signs of either exercise-induced or ambulatory myocardial ischemia.