Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for diagnosis of chronic Q fever.

From 1982 through 1987 we diagnosed 13 chronic Q fever cases. Clinically these patients presented a culture-negative endocarditis, and all but two had high complement-fixing antibody titers to Coxiella burnetii phase I (reciprocal titer above 200). With the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), titers of immunoglobulin G (IgG) to phases I and II of C. burnetii averaged 158,000 and 69,900, respectively, whereas they reached 300 and 3,200 in acute Q fever cases. Similarly, IgA to both phases of C. burnetii and IgM to phase I were consistently higher during chronic than acute Q fever. The serological follow-up of one patient with chronic Q fever over a 4-year period showed a good correlation between the titers of IgG and IgM antibody titers detected by ELISA and indirect fluorescent-antibody test (IFA) to both phases of C. burnetii. Few discrepancies appeared with IgA. Shortly after initiation of antibiotic treatment, a slow and steady decrease of the antibody titers to C. burnetii phases I and II was observed. The complement fixation, IFA, and ELISA tests showed the same type of antibody response. The ELISA proved to be an excellent diagnostic test for chronic Q fever. It distinguished negative from positive reactions clearly, and results were highly reproducible. The reading is objective, and the test is simple to perform and more sensitive than the IFA and complement fixation tests. The ELISA is recommended for serologic evaluation of patients with chronic Q fever.     

Predominant Immunoglobulin A Response to Phase II Antigen of Coxiella burnetii in Acute Q Fever

Diagnosis of acute Q fever is usually confirmed by serology, on the basis of anti-phase II antigen immunoglobulin M (IgM) titers of ≥1:50 and IgG titers of ≥1:200. Phase I antibodies, especially IgG and IgA, are predominant in chronic forms of the disease. However, between January 1982 and June 1998, we observed anti-phase II antigen IgA titers of ≥1:200 as the sole or main antibody response in 10 of 1,034 (0.96%) patients with acute Q fever for whom information was available. In order to determine whether specific epidemiological or clinical factors were associated with these serological profiles, we conducted a retrospective case-control study that included completion of a standardized questionnaire, which was given to 40 matched controls who also suffered from acute Q fever. The mean age of patients with elevated phase II IgA titers was significantly higher than that usually observed for patients with acute Q fever (P = 0.026); the patients were also more likely than controls to live in rural areas (P = 0.026) and to have increased levels of transaminase in blood (P = 0.03). Elevated IgA titers are usually associated with chronic Q fever and are directed mainly at phase I antigens. Although the significance of our findings is unexplained, we herein emphasize the fact that IgA antibodies are not specific for chronic forms of Q fever and that they may occasionally be observed in patients with acute disease. Moreover, as such antibody profiles may not be determined by most laboratories, which test only for total antibody titers to phase I and II antigens, the three isotype-specific Ig titers should be determined as the first step in diagnosing Q fever.     

Microbiological Challenges in the Diagnosis of Chronic Q Fever

Diagnosis of chronic Q fever is difficult. PCR and culture lack sensitivity; hence, diagnosis relies mainly on serologic tests using an immunofluorescence assay (IFA). Optimal phase I IgG cutoff titers are debated but are estimated to be between 1:800 and 1:1,600. In patients with proven, probable, or possible chronic Q fever, we studied phase I IgG antibody titers at the time of positive blood PCR, at diagnosis, and at peak levels during chronic Q fever. We evaluated 200 patients, of whom 93 (46.5%) had proven, 51 (25.5%) had probable, and 56 (28.0%) had possible chronic Q fever. Sixty-five percent of proven cases had positive Coxiella burnetii PCR results for blood, which was associated with high phase I IgG. Median phase I IgG titers at diagnosis and peak titers in patients with proven chronic Q fever were significantly higher than those for patients with probable and possible chronic Q fever. The positive predictive values for proven chronic Q fever, compared to possible chronic Q fever, at titers 1:1,024, 1:2,048, 1:4,096, and ≥1:8,192 were 62.2%, 66.7%, 76.5%, and ≥86.2%, respectively. However, sensitivity dropped to <60% when cutoff titers of ≥1:8,192 were used. Although our study demonstrated a strong association between high phase I IgG titers and proven chronic Q fever, increasing the current diagnostic phase I IgG cutoff to >1:1,024 is not recommended due to increased false-negative findings (sensitivity < 60%) and the high morbidity and mortality of untreated chronic Q fever. Our study emphasizes that serologic results are not diagnostic on their own but should always be interpreted in combination with clinical parameters.     

Q fever serology: cutoff determination for microimmunofluorescence.

Q fever, a worldwide zoonosis caused by Coxiella burnetii, lacks clinical specificity and may present as acute or chronic disease. Because of this polymorphism, serological confirmation is necessary to assess the diagnosis. Although microimmunofluorescence is our reference technique, the cutoff titers that are currently used to make a diagnosis of active or chronic Q fever were determined years ago with limited series of patients and sera. We determined the titers of immunoglobulin G (IgG), IgM, and IgA against both phases (I and II) of Coxiella burnetii. Rheumatoid factor was removed before testing IgM and IgA. We report here the various cutoff titers and the kinetics of antibody development from 2,218 first serum samples of patients, among whom 208 suffered from acute Q fever and 53 had chronic Q fever. In active Q fever, we have defined a low cutoff (phase II IgG titer < or = 100) below which the diagnosis cannot be made and would need further confirmation and confirmed a high cutoff (phase II IgG titer > or = 200 and phase II IgM titer > or = 50) over which the diagnosis can be made. For chronic Q fever diagnosis, phase I IgA titers are not contributive despite previous works claiming their usefulness; a phase I IgG titer of > or = 800 is highly predictive (98%) and sensitive (100%). We have also studied the possibility of rejecting or evoking the diagnosis of chronic Q fever by phase II IgG and IgA titers. This method is useful when phase I testing is not available, but the sensitivity remains low (57%).     

Evaluation of Commonly Used Serological Tests for Detection of Coxiella burnetii Antibodies in Well-Defined Acute and Follow-Up Sera

In this study, we compared Coxiella burnetii IgG phase I, IgG phase II, and IgM phase II detection among a commercially available enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) (Virion/Serion), an indirect fluorescent antibody test (IFAT) (Focus Diagnostics), and a complement fixation test (CFT) (Virion/Serion). For this, we used a unique collection of acute- and convalescent-phase sera from 126 patients with acute Q fever diagnosed by positive Coxiella burnetii PCR of blood. We were able to establish a reliable date of onset of disease, since DNA is detectable within 2 weeks after the start of symptoms. In acute samples, at t = 0, IFAT demonstrated IgM phase II antibodies in significantly more sera than did ELISA (31.8% versus 19.7%), although the portion of solitary IgM phase II was equal for IFAT and for ELISA (18.2% and 16.7%, respectively). Twelve months after the diagnosis of acute Q fever, 83.5% and 62.2% of the sera were still positive for IgM phase II with IFAT and ELISA, respectively. At 12 months IFAT IgG phase II showed the slowest decline. Therefore, definitive serological evidence of acute Q fever cannot be based on a single serum sample in areas of epidemicity and should involve measurement of both IgM and IgG antibodies in paired serum. Based on IgG phase II antibody detection in paired samples (at 0 and 3 months) from 62 patients, IFAT confirmed more cases than ELISA and CFT, but the differences were not statically significant (100% for IFAT, 95.2% for ELISA, and 96.8% for CFT). This study demonstrated that the three serological tests are equally effective in diagnosing acute Q fever within 3 months of start of symptoms. In follow-up sera, more IgG antibodies were detected by IFAT than by ELISA or CFT, making IFAT more suitable for prevaccination screening programs.     

Efficiency of various serological techniques for diagnosing Coxiella burnetii infection

An indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA) using a recently developed commercial kit for detecting antibodies against Coxiella burnetii (C.b.), the etiological agent of Q fever, has been evaluated using human field serum samples. The IFA was compared with an ELISA and a complement fixation test (CFT). The IFA was based on the corpuscular C.b. phase I and phase II antigens specific to anti-C.b. phase I and II antibodies, respectively. Fifty sera from persons with symptoms of Q fever were examined in this study. The IFA compared with the ELISA showed the sensitivities of 97.7% and 87.2% for IgG and 66.7% and 60.0% for IgM phase II and I antibodies, respectively and the specificities of 100% and 90.0% for IgG and 75.9% and 64.7% for IgM phase II and phase I antibodies, respectively. Due to a limited number of sera positive in the IgA antibody testing, the data presented should be considered with caution. It appears that the IFA strikes a very good balance between high specificity and sensitivity with phase II and phase I IgG antibodies and a less satisfactory one with IgM antibodies. The CFT failed in one of the above aspects showing a good specificity but a poor sensitivity, especially for phase I antibodies. The study demonstrated that the IFA is suitable for diagnosing Q fever and its therapeutic follow-up and is a good candidate for screening sera in large numbers. A certain limitation, especially in testing early stages of the chronic disease, could be a low fluorescence intensity of the IgA positive control in comparison with the IgA negative one.     

Predominant immunoglobulin A response to phase II antigen of Coxiella burnetii in acute Q fever

Diagnosis of acute Q fever is usually confirmed by serology, on the basis of anti-phase II antigen immunoglobulin M (IgM) titers of >/=1:50 and IgG titers of >/=1:200. Phase I antibodies, especially IgG and IgA, are predominant in chronic forms of the disease. However, between January 1982 and June 1998, we observed anti-phase II antigen IgA titers of >/=1:200 as the sole or main antibody response in 10 of 1,034 (0.96%) patients with acute Q fever for whom information was available. In order to determine whether specific epidemiological or clinical factors were associated with these serological profiles, we conducted a retrospective case-control study that included completion of a standardized questionnaire, which was given to 40 matched controls who also suffered from acute Q fever. The mean age of patients with elevated phase II IgA titers was significantly higher than that usually observed for patients with acute Q fever (P = 0.026); the patients were also more likely than controls to live in rural areas (P = 0.026) and to have increased levels of transaminase in blood (P = 0.03). Elevated IgA titers are usually associated with chronic Q fever and are directed mainly at phase I antigens. Although the significance of our findings is unexplained, we herein emphasize the fact that IgA antibodies are not specific for chronic forms of Q fever and that they may occasionally be observed in patients with acute disease. Moreover, as such antibody profiles may not be determined by most laboratories, which test only for total antibody titers to phase I and II antigens, the three isotype-specific Ig titers should be determined as the first step in diagnosing Q fever.     

Immunoglobulin responses in acute Q fever

Knowledge of the development of different classes of antibody during the course of acute Q fever is important to the clinician for interpreting a patient's serological test results. In the present study, the appearance of antibodies to Coxiella burnetii phases I and II was determined for a period of 1 year. A total of 683 sera from 191 patients with symptomatic Q fever were evaluated by the complement fixation and indirect immunofluorescence (immunoglobulins M and G [IgM, IgG]) tests. These patients had contracted acute Q fever in the fall of 1983 during an epidemic that resulted in 415 serologically confirmed cases of Q fever. As demonstrated by the complement fixation test, antibodies to C. burnetii phase II remained elevated throughout the entire study period, whereas antibodies to phase I were barely detectable. Although the immunofluorescence test was more sensitive than the complement fixation test, the specific anti-IgG response to C. burnetii to phases I and II gave the same general antibody profiles as did the complement fixation test. IgM anti-phase I and II titers appeared earlier but disappeared after 10 to 12 weeks. During this period, anti-phase II antibody levels were generally much higher than anti-phase I antibody levels.     

Serological follow-up in patients with aorto-iliac disease and evidence of Q fever infection

The aim of this study was to provide data on the risk of developing chronic Q fever in patients with aorto-iliac disease and evidence of previous Q fever infection. Patients with an aortic and/or iliac aneurysm or aorto-iliac reconstruction (aorto-iliac disease) and evidence of previous Q fever infection were included. The presence of phase I and II Coxiella burnetii IgG antibodies was assessed periodically using immunofluorescence assay. A total of 111 patients with aorto-iliac disease were divided into three groups, based upon the serological profile [mean follow-up: 16?±?9 months (mean?±?standard deviation)]. Group 1 consisted of 30 patients with a serological trace of C. burnetii infection (negative IgG phase I, IgG phase II titer of 1:32). Of these, 36.7 % converted to serological profile matching past resolved Q fever. Group 2 included 49 patients with negative IgG phase I titer and IgG phase II titer ≥1:64. No patients developed chronic Q fever, but 14.3 % converted to a positive IgG phase I titer. Group 3 consisted of 32 patients with positive IgG phase I and positive IgG phase II titers, of which 9.4 % developed chronic Q fever (significantly different from group 2, p?=?0.039). The IgG phase I titer increased in 28.1 % of patients (from 1:64 to 1:4,096). The risk of developing chronic Q fever in patients with aorto-iliac disease and previous Q fever infection with a positive IgG phase I titer was 9.4 %. The IgG phase I titer increases or becomes positive in a substantial number of patients. A standardized serological follow-up is proposed.     

Detection of phase I IgG antibodies to Coxiella burnetii with EIA as a screening test for blood donations

The presence of a high phase I IgG antibody titre may indicate chronic infection and a risk for the transmission of Coxiella burnetii through blood transfusion. The outbreak of Q fever in the Netherlands allowed for the comparison of an enzyme immunoassay (EIA) with the reference immunofluorescence assay (IFA) in a large group of individuals one year after acute Q fever. EIA is 100?% sensitive in detecting high (≥1:1,024) phase I IgG antibody titres. The cost of screening with EIA and confirming all EIA-positive results with IFA is much lower than screening all donations with IFA. This should be taken into account in cost-effectiveness analyses of screening programmes.     

Comparison of ELISA and indirect immunofluorescent antibody assay detecting <Emphasis Type="Italic">Coxiella burnetii</Emphasis> IgM phase II for the diagnosis of acute Q fever

A commercially available enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) detecting Coxiella burnetii phase II-specific IgM for the diagnosis of acute Q fever was compared with indirect immunofluorescent antibody assay (IFA). IFA is the current reference method for the detection of antibodies against C. burnetii, but has disadvantages because the judgment of fluorescence is subjective and tiring, and the test is expensive and automation is not possible. To examine whether phase II IgM ELISA could be used as a screening assay for acute Q fever, we compared the sensitivity and specificity of IFA and ELISA. The sensitivity of the IFA and ELISA tests were 100 and 85.7%, respectively, with a specificity of 95.3 and 97.6%, respectively. Because of the high sensitivity and specificity of the ELISA in combination with the practical disadvantages of the IFA, we introduced a new algorithm to screen samples of patients with symptoms of acute Q fever infection.     

Real-Time PCR with Serum Samples Is Indispensable for Early Diagnosis of Acute Q Fever

The world''s largest Q fever outbreak is ongoing in The Netherlands with around 3,000 confirmed cases since the first half of 2007. Increased awareness has resulted in early referral of patients for diagnostics. An important drawback to serological diagnosis of acute Q fever is the lag phase in antibody response. Therefore, we evaluated the performance of a real-time PCR for detection of Coxiella burnetii DNA using serum samples from patients with acute Q fever. PCR, targeting IS1111, was retrospectively performed on acute-phase and follow-up convalescent-phase serum samples from 65 patients with acute Q fever as diagnosed by immunofluorescence assay. The results obtained by PCR were related to disease stage as defined by subsequent appearance of phase II IgM, phase II IgG, phase I IgM, and phase I IgG (IgM-II, IgG-II, IgM-I, and IgG-I, respectively) antibodies and time since onset of disease. In addition, we analyzed seronegative acute-phase serum samples from patients with inconclusive Q fever serology, because no convalescent-phase serum samples were available. PCR was scored positive in 49/50 (98%) seronegative sera, 9/10 (90%) sera with isolated IgM-II antibodies, 3/13 (23%) sera with IgM-II/IgG-II antibodies, 2/41 (5%) sera with IgM-II/IgG-II/IgM-I antibodies, 0/15 (0%) sera with IgM-II/IgG-II/IgM-I/IgG-I antibodies, and 0/1 (0%) serum sample with IgM-II/IgG-II/IgG-I antibodies. The latest time point after onset of disease in which C. burnetii DNA could be detected was at day 17. In patients with inconclusive Q fever serology, PCR was positive in 5/50 (10%) cases. We conclude that real-time PCR with serum samples is indispensable for early diagnosis of acute Q fever. C. burnetii DNA becomes undetectable in serum as the serological response develops.Q fever, an infection caused by the bacterium Coxiella burnetii, results in a self-limiting disease in 40 to 50% of infected cases. Pneumonia is the predominant presenting symptom in acute Q fever, although fever and hepatitis are also frequently observed (9, 10). Failure to diagnose acute Q fever and delay in treatment may lead to prolonged morbidity and increased hospital admission rates (4, 7, 11, 14).During three consecutive years, large Q fever epidemics occurred in an area in the south of The Netherlands where the disease was formerly not prevalent (11). In 2007 there were a total of 191 confirmed cases reported, in 2008 a total of 998, and in 2009 more than 2,000 confirmed cases were reported, which ranks the outbreak as the largest Q fever epidemic recorded to date. The affected area has a large density of dairy goats, of which a number have tested positive for Q fever. Next to the differences in sizes of the epidemics, the interval between onset of disease and date of diagnosis decreased from a median of 77 days in 2007 to 29 days in 2008 and 17 days in 2009 (12). Moreover, the hospital admission rates were reduced from 40% in 2007 to 20% in 2008 (11). Both observations are most likely due to increased awareness among physicians in the affected area resulting in early submission of clinical samples to the laboratory, subsequent earlier diagnosis, and probably fewer undiagnosed cases. The majority of diagnostic samples from both epidemics were submitted to our laboratory, which lies in the center of the epidemic area and serves a catchment area of roughly 500,000 persons in a semirural district supporting two hospitals and surrounding general practitioners.The gold standard for serological diagnosis of an infectious disease is either a seroconversion or a 4-fold rise in antibody titer. The reference test for serological diagnosis of Q fever is the immunofluorescence assay (IFA) (8). Antibodies are expressed against phase II antigens during the acute infection and against phase I antigens in the established infection. For both antigens, IgM antibody production precedes IgG production, and thus three phases can be distinguished in acute Q fever: a seronegative phase followed by IgM/IgG phase II seroconversion during the acute infection and subsequent IgM/IgG phase I seroconversion in the established infection. However, an important drawback to serological diagnosis of acute Q fever is the lag phase in antibody response of 7 to 15 days after onset of clinical symptoms (8).Apart from serology, C. burnetii-specific PCR of serum samples can be an additional tool to diagnose Q fever in the early acute phase, but conflicting sensitivities have been reported (3, 13). Here, we evaluated the performance of an in-house-developed real-time PCR assay for detection of C. burnetii DNA in serum samples from patients with acute Q fever.     

Molecular detection of Coxiella burnetii in the sera of patients with Q fever endocarditis or vascular infection

In the absence of a specific diagnosis based on serology, chronic Q fever is inevitably fatal. However, diagnosis is often delayed because the test is not widely available. To shorten the diagnostic delay, we adapted a nested-PCR assay with serum as a template and the LightCycler as a thermal cycler, termed LCN-PCR. We retrospectively and prospectively applied this method to samples from 48 patients diagnosed with Q fever endocarditis or vascular infection and to samples from 100 controls with endocarditis caused by other microorganisms. We also prospectively applied this technique to samples from 30 patients treated for a Q fever endocarditis and to samples from 13 patients with a convalescent acute Q fever with ambiguous immunoglobulin G (IgG) phase I titer. LCN-PCR had a specificity of 100%. It was positive only in samples from patients with evolutive Q fever, as none of the samples from patients with a treated chronic Q fever or with a convalescent acute Q fever presented positive results. When performed prospectively on recently stored sera, the sensitivity of LCN-PCR is 64% (7 of 11 samples; P = 0.004), but the efficiency of LCN-PCR was dramatically altered by the storage of specimens at -20 degrees C. High IgG phase I titers decreased the sensitivity of LCN-PCR. A significant difference was observed among LCN-PCR results for sera with IgG phase I titers of > or =1:25,600 compared to sera with IgG phase I titers of <1:25,600 (0 of 15 samples versus 13 of 33 samples; P = 0.004). In patient samples with titers below 1:25,600 tested prospectively, sensitivity was 100% (7 of 7). The LCN-PCR assay may be helpful in establishing an early diagnosis of chronic Q fever.     

Q fever--still a query and underestimated infectious disease

Coxiella burnetii (C.b.) is a strictly intracellular, Gram-negative bacterium. It causes Q fever in humans and animals worldwide. The animal Q fever is sometimes designated "coxiellosis". This infection has many different reservoirs including arthropods, birds and mammals. Domestic animals and pets, are the most frequent source of human infections. Q fever may appear basically in two forms, acute and chronic (persistent). The latter form of Q fever in animals is characteristic by shedding C.b. into the environment during parturition or abortion. Human Q fever results usually from inhalation of contaminated aerosols originating mostly from tissue and body fluids of infected animals. Q fever may appear in humans either in an acute form accompanied mainly by fever (pneumonia, flu-like disease, hepatitis) or in a chronic form (mainly endocarditis). Diagnosis of Q fever is based on isolation of the agent in cell culture, its direct detection, namely by PCR, and serology. Detection of high phase II antibodies titers 1-3 weeks after the onset of symptoms and identification of IgM antibodies are indicative to acute infection. High phase I IgG antibody titers >800 as revealed by microimmunofluorescence offer evidence of chronic C.b. infection. For acute Q fever, a two-weeks-treatment with doxycycline is recommended as the first-line therapy. In the case of Q fever endocarditis a long-term combined antibiotic therapy is necessary to prevent relapses. Application of Q fever vaccines containing or prepared from phase I C.b. corpuscles should be considered at least for professionally exposed groups of the population. Infections caused by C.b. are spread worldwide and may pose serious and often underestimated health problems in human but also in veterinary medicine. Though during the last decades substantial progress in investigation of C.b. has been achieved and many data concerning this pathogen has been accumulated, some questions, namely those related to the pathogenesis of the disease, remain open.     

Serological differentiation between acute (late control) and endocarditis Q fever.

AIMS--To differentiate the serological profiles of chronic (endocarditis) Q fever from the late follow up of acute cases. METHODS--Twenty patients (10 diagnosed with acute and 10 with endocarditis Q fever) were studied. Those diagnosed with acute infection were followed up from 2.5 to 88 months (mean 35.8 months). Serological variables included indirect immunofluorescence against phase I and II of Coxiella burnetii (IgM, IgG, and IgA), complement fixation and rheumatoid factor (RF). RESULTS--All patients with titres of IgA against phase I, after IgG removal, equal to or above 320 and a complement fixation value equal to or above 128 had endocarditis. No patient with acute Q fever had such a serological profile. CONCLUSIONS--The combination of IgA against phase I and complement fixation values may be sufficient to differentiate the serological profile of chronic (endocarditis) Q fever from the late follow up of acute cases.     

Q Fever

Q fever is a zoonosis with a worldwide distribution with the exception of New Zealand. The disease is caused by Coxiella burnetii, a strictly intracellular, gram-negative bacterium. Many species of mammals, birds, and ticks are reservoirs of C. burnetii in nature. C. burnetii infection is most often latent in animals, with persistent shedding of bacteria into the environment. However, in females intermittent high-level shedding occurs at the time of parturition, with millions of bacteria being released per gram of placenta. Humans are usually infected by contaminated aerosols from domestic animals, particularly after contact with parturient females and their birth products. Although often asymptomatic, Q fever may manifest in humans as an acute disease (mainly as a self-limited febrile illness, pneumonia, or hepatitis) or as a chronic disease (mainly endocarditis), especially in patients with previous valvulopathy and to a lesser extent in immunocompromised hosts and in pregnant women. Specific diagnosis of Q fever remains based upon serology. Immunoglobulin M (IgM) and IgG antiphase II antibodies are detected 2 to 3 weeks after infection with C. burnetii, whereas the presence of IgG antiphase I C. burnetii antibodies at titers of >/=1:800 by microimmunofluorescence is indicative of chronic Q fever. The tetracyclines are still considered the mainstay of antibiotic therapy of acute Q fever, whereas antibiotic combinations administered over prolonged periods are necessary to prevent relapses in Q fever endocarditis patients. Although the protective role of Q fever vaccination with whole-cell extracts has been established, the population which should be primarily vaccinated remains to be clearly identified. Vaccination should probably be considered in the population at high risk for Q fever endocarditis.     

用重组汉坦病毒NP、GP检测急性期HFRS患者血清中特异性IgG、IgM、IgA抗体

目的 探讨肾综合征出血热(HFRS)患者急性期IgA、IgG、IgM抗体的变化规律。方法 使用套式RT-PCR检测此次病毒感染情况。用杆状病毒表达的汉坦病毒重组核蛋白(rNP)和糖蛋白(rGP)为抗原，使用ELISA方法检测了14例急性期肾综合征出血热患者的6l份系列血清中的IgA、IgG、IgM抗体。结果 14例肾综合征出血热患者中，ll例患者的血清用RT-PCR检出家鼠型汉坦病毒核酸。几乎所有肾综合征出血热患者早期即有IgA、IgM、IgG抗体的迅速升高，抗rNP抗体滴度明显高于rGP。3种抗rNP抗体中早期IgG上升趋势最为显著，IgM与IgA次之，IgM与IgA上升趋势相近，但IgA的滴度明显高于IgM。抗rGP抗体中XgA变化最显著，IgG次之。IgM发病2周内总的变化趋势不明显，但是发病l周内滴度上升趋势明显，而发病第2周内则呈下降趋势。其中l例RT-PCR阳性的患者，早期IgM未测出，IgA的滴度却较高。l例重度患者，抗糖蛋白IgG、IgM和IgA抗体滴度均低于其他患者，且整个急性期一直维持较低水平。结论 肾综合征出血热急性期IgA、IgG、lgM变化具有明显的规律，抗糖蛋白和核蛋白抗体病患规律不同，检测IgM的同时检测IgA，可以提高诊断的准确性。     

New criteria for immunofluorescence assay for Q fever diagnosis in Japan

A study was made to evaluate the cutoff value of indirect immunofluorescent-antibody (IFA) test for Q fever diagnosis in Japan. We used 346 sera, including 16 from confirmed Q fever cases, 304 from Japanese pneumonia patients, and 26 from negative cases. Thirteen sera from the confirmed Q fever cases with an immunoglobulin M (IgM) titer of > or =1:128 and/or IgG titer of > or =1:256 by the IFA test were positive by both enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and Western blotting assay (WBA), whereas 298 sera from pneumonia patients and 26 negative sera with an IgM titer of < or =1:16 and an IgG titer of < or =1:32 by the IFA test were negative by both ELISA and WBA. In the proposed "equivocal area," with an IgM titer of > or =1:32 and < or =1:64 and/or an IgG titer of > or =1:64 and < or =1:128, we found 9 sera, 3 from confirmed Q fever cases and 6 from Japanese pneumonia patients, by the IFA test. Three sera from the confirmed Q fever cases and one of the sera from pneumonia patients were IgM and/or IgG positive by both ELISA and WBA. These results suggest that a single cutoff value for the IFA test may cause false-positive and false-negative results. In conclusion, this study showed that an "equivocal area" should be used for the IFA test rather than a single cutoff value and that sera in the equivocal area should be tested by additional serological assays for confirmation.     

Diagnosis of endocarditis in acute Q-fever by immunofluorescence serology

The authors compared two groups of 20 patients suffering from Q fever using microimmunofluorescence (micro IF) serology. One group had endocarditis and the other conventional symptoms of acute Q fever but no endocarditis. Determination of the levels of antibodies against the two phases of rickettsiae in each of the three immunoglobulin classes (IgG, IgM and IgA), allowed to determine the type of infection using a single serum sample. Patients having IgA class antiphase I antibodies at a level equal to/or higher than 1:25 as well as those whose antibody levels fulfilled the conditions for the equation (IgG anti-phase I greater than or equal to IgG anti-phase II) + (IgA anti-phase I greater than or equal to IgA anti-phase II) were suffering from endocarditis. The positive predictive value of these tests was 100% and 94.1%, respectively.