Clinical evaluation of two one-bottle dentin adhesives at three years

BACKGROUND: The method currently used to adhere resin to dentin involves etching, priming and bonding. Many commercial adhesives now combine priming and bonding functions in a single solution, and these are frequently called one-bottle adhesives. The purpose of this study was to compare the 36-month clinical performance of two commercial one-bottle adhesives. METHODS: The authors enrolled 33 patients with noncarious cervical lesions in the study. A total of 101 lesions were restored with either a filled, ethanol-based adhesive (OptiBond Solo, SDS Kerr) or an unfilled, acetone-based adhesive (Prime & Bond 2.1, Dentsply Caulk) and a hybrid resin-based composite. Enamel margins were not beveled, and no mechanical retention was placed. The restorations were evaluated at baseline and six months, 18 months and 36 months after placement using modified Cvar/Ryge criteria. RESULTS: The retention rates at 36 months were 93.3 percent for the ethanol-based adhesive and 89.4 percent for the acetone-based adhesive. The difference in retention rates was not statistically significant. In both groups, 12 percent of the retained restorations had marginal staining, but no recurrent caries was detected around any restoration. Other restoration characteristics such as marginal adaptation and color match remained excellent three years after placement. CONCLUSIONS: The performance of both adhesives was excellent during this 36-month clinical trial. At the most recent recall evaluation (that is, 36 months), the filled, ethanol-based adhesive exhibited slightly better bond durability, but the difference between the two materials was not statistically significant. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: The one-bottle adhesives evaluated in this study provided excellent clinical retention of Class V restorations without mechanical retention. When the materials are used properly, restorations are retained at a high rate during at least three years of clinical service.     

A three-year clinical evaluation of two dentin bonding agents

BACKGROUND: A new restorative called a "giomer composite" has been introduced. The authors conducted a study to determine retention, anatomical form, caries, staining, marginal discoloration, marginal adaptation, surface roughness and sensitivity of giomer compared with those of a microfilled composite. METHODS: The authors placed 40 sets of restorations randomly in canines and premolars in vivo. They used a giomer composite and a microfilled composite in erosion/abrasion/abfraction Class V lesions that were not altered with rotary instruments. They placed the restorations according to manufacturer's recommendations, and two calibrated examiners evaluated the restorations independently using modified U.S. Public Health Service criteria at baseline and at six, 18 and 36 months. The lesions receiving the restorations did not differ from each other in the amount of circumferential enamel present, the percentage of the surface area of dentin or lesion type. RESULTS: There were no differences in the restorations at baseline, an evaluation made two weeks after placement. At 36 months, the giomer and microfilled composite restorations were not significantly different from one another in any of the eight criteria evaluated. The percentage agreement between examiners was at least 83 percent for each criterion in each evaluation period. CONCLUSIONS: Both the giomer and the microfilled composite used in this study meet the clinical portion of the Acceptance Program Guidelines for Dentin and Enamel Adhesives Materials established by the American Dental Association. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Both the giomer and the microfilled composite used in this study can be used with confidence in Class V lesions.     

In vitro durability of one-bottle resin adhesives bonded to dentin

Recently, one-bottle resins adhesives have been developed to reduce the number of clinical steps of resin application. They are now widely used in clinical dental practice. However, little is known regarding the detailed mechanism of bond degradation. Therefore, this study evaluated the durability of one-bottle resin adhesives using long-term water storage testing. Resin-dentin bonded specimens were prepared using five commercially available one-bottle resin adhesives. The specimens were sectioned perpendicular to the adhesive interface to produce beams and stored in distilled water for 24 hours (control), 100, 200, and 300 days. After the water storage, each beam was subjected to a microtensile bond test and then SEM fractography was performed on the fractured surface. Compared to the bond strength at 24 hours after bonding (control), the bond strength of all tested adhesives were significantly decreased after 100 or more days in water. SEM fractography revealed a typical type of deterioration in the adhesive-composite interface that might cause a decline in bond strength after aging.     

In vitro degradation of resin–dentin bonds with one-bottle self-etching adhesives

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the durability of one-bottle self-etching adhesive during long-term water-storage testing. Resin–dentin bonded specimens were prepared using four commercially available one-bottle self-etching adhesives. The specimens were sectioned perpendicular to the adhesive interface to produce beam-shaped specimens that were stored in water for 24 h (control group) and 100, 200, and 300 d (experimental groups). After each storage period, the beams were subjected to a microtensile bond test. After the bond test, fractured surfaces were examined using a scanning electron microscope. In addition, interfacial observations of the silver tracer were performed using the secondary and back-scatter modes of the scanning electron microscope. The bond strength of all tested adhesives decreased significantly after 100 or more days in water. The interfacial observations showed an oxygen-inhibition zone as electron lucent in the adhesive–composite border in control specimens, displaying silver impregnation with breakage after aging. The deterioration of the oxygen-inhibition zone in the adhesive–resin composite junction resulted in a decrease in bond strength after 100 d in water for one-bottle self-etching adhesives.     

In vitro interfacial relationship between human dentin and one-bottle dental adhesives.

OBJECTIVES: One-bottle dentin adhesives combine primer and adhesive resin into a single solution. This study was conducted to determine the bond strengths to dentin of four one-bottle bonding systems and to evaluate their SEM interfacial morphology. The hypothesis to be tested was that the water-based bonding system would produce lower bond strengths and less complete penetration into dentin than other bonding systems that are dissolved in organic solvents. METHODS: Forty extracted molars were ground to expose middle dentin and were randomly assigned to four groups (n = 10): Group 1--Experimental Single Bond (3M Dental Products Division); Group 2--Prime&Bond 2.1, pre-launch version (Dentsply DeTrey); Group 3--Syntac Single-Component (Vivadent); Group 4--Tenure Quik with Fluoride (Den-Mat Co.) The surfaces were treated according to manufacturers' instructions. After 24 h in water, the specimens were thermocycled, and the bond strengths were measured in shear. The data were analyzed with ANOVA and Duncan's test at a confidence level of 95%. Further, the adhesives were also applied to 600 microns thick dentin disks. After preparing polished cross sections, the bonded interfaces were demineralized, deproteinized, and observed under a FE-SEM. The morphological appearance of the resin-dentin interface surfaces was compared by screening the entire resin-dentin interface for each specimen. RESULTS: Two morphological characteristics were evaluated: 1) the depth of resin penetration into the tubules and 2) the thickness and density of the resin-dentin interdiffusion zone. Single Bond showed statistically higher mean shear bond strengths (p < 0.001) compared to the other three materials. Specimens prepared with Syntac Single-Component and Prime&Bond 2.1 were ranked in the intermediary Duncan's grouping. Specimens bonded with Tenure Quik with Fluoride exhibited the lowest mean shear bond strength. All materials penetrated and hybridized dentin. Single Bond formed a thick layer of adhesive resin on the top of the interdiffusion area without debonding, whereas some areas of debonding were observed on the top of the hybrid layers for Prime&Bond 2.1 and Syntac Single-Component. For the water-based adhesive Syntac Single-Component, the interdiffusion zone displayed a thick filigree pattern, containing scattered open spaces between the resin-enveloped collagen fibers. Tenure Quik with Fluoride did not thoroughly infiltrate the demineralized dentin zone, resulting in wide gaps in all specimens. Prime&Bond 2.1 formed the shortest resin tags, whereas Syntac Single-Component formed the longest resin tags. SIGNIFICANCE: Bonding to dentin remains unpredictable using one-bottle bonding systems. The chemistry of each individual material may be more important than the type of solvent.     

Six-month storage-time evaluation of one-bottle adhesive systems to dentin

Purpose : The goal of this study was to evaluate the 1-week, 3-month, and 6-month performance of eight commercially available one-bottle adhesive systems to dentin.
Materials and Methods : Lingual and buccal surfaces from human third molars were ground wet on 600-grit SiC paper to obtain a flat dentinal surface. The specimens were randomly divided into 24 groups (n = 10), which were established to measure the shear bond strengths of Bond-1 (B1), ONE-STEP (OS), OptiBond SOLO (OP), Prime & Bond 2.1 (PB), Single Bond (SB), STAE (ST), Syntac Sprint (SS), and Tenure Quick (TQ) after 1-week, 3-month, and 6-month water storage at 37°C. One-bottle adhesives were applied according to manufacturers' instructions and Z100 composite cylinders were applied on the bonded dentinal surfaces. The 3-month water-storage groups were thermocycled for 1500 cycles at 5°C and 55°C and 6-month groups for 3000 cycles. After storage periods, specimens were tested in shear in a universal testing machine (0.5 mm/min). Results were statistically analyzed by analysis of variance and Tukey test.
Results : The changes in shear bond strengths were not uniform over time. Over the test period, OS, PB, SB, and SS exhibited bond strength stability, however, SS presented low bond strengths on all tested periods. A significant decrease in bond strength was observed for B1, OP, ST, and TQ after the 6-month storage period.
CLINICAL SlGNlFlCANCE
Bonding is only clinically significant if long lasting. Three one-bottle adhesive systems presented remarkable stability over the storage period and thermal cycling regimen. However, decreased bond strengths were verified for the other bonding agents.     

Eighteen-month clinical evaluation of two dentin adhesives applied on dry vs moist dentin

PURPOSE: To evaluate the influence of substrate moisture on the clinical behavior of two dentin adhesives after 18 months. The null hypothesis tested was that drying dentin with air upon rinsing off the acid would not influence the clinical performance of two dentin adhesives as compared to leaving the preparation visibly moist. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-five patients were enrolled in this study. One hundred twenty-eight restorations divided into 4 groups were inserted and evaluated at baseline: (1) NT/Moist - Prime & Bond NT, an acetone-based adhesive, applied on moist dentin; (2) NT/Dried - Prime & Bond NT applied on dentin dried with air for 3 to 4 s; (3) SB/Moist - Single Bond, an ethanol- and water-based adhesive, applied on moist dentin; (4) SB/Dried - Single Bond applied on dentin dried with air for 3 to 4 s. A microfilled composite resin was used for all restorations. Patients were recalled at 6 and 18 months. RESULTS: At 18 months after initial placement, 110 restorations (86% recall rate) were re-evaluated. Retention rates at 18 months were 92% for NT/Moist, 93% for NT/Dried, 100% for SB/Moist, and 89% for SB/Dried. No statistically significant differences were found among groups for retention rate. Both NT/Moist and SB/Moist resulted in a significant decrease in sensitivity to air from baseline to 18 months. When data were pooled for the variable "substrate moisture", SB resulted in an overall retention rate of 95%, while NT resulted in a retention rate of 92% (statistically similar). The marginal adaptation with SB was significantly worse at 18 months than at baseline. CONCLUSION: The moisture level of the dentin substrate in noncarious cervical lesions does not influence retention of composite restorations, but moist conditions caused less sensitivity to air. When applied as per manufacturers' instructions (moist dentin), both adhesives resulted in Class V retention rates exceeding the ADA 18-month full acceptance guidelines.     

Dimensional changes and ultimate tensile strengths of wet decalcified dentin applied with one-bottle adhesives

OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were to test the null hypothesis that no dimensional changes in wet decalcified dentin matrices will occur during the application of one-bottle adhesives, and to evaluate the ultimate tensile strengths (UTS) of resin-infiltrated dentin matrices using the microtensile test. METHODS: Dentin disks 0.2 mm thick were prepared from mid-coronal dentin of human unerupted third molars. They were completely decalcified in 0.5 M EDTA (pH 7.4) for 5 days at 25 degrees C and then placed in the bottom of an aluminum well to permit use of the LVDT portion of a thermal mechanical analyzer. Changes in matrix height in response to the application of Single Bond, One-Step or Prime & Bond NT were measured along with the UTS of resin-infiltrated specimens that were compared using a one-way ANOVA and Fisher's PLSD test. RESULTS: All one-bottle adhesives produced a gradual, progressive shrinkage of the decalcified matrix of 26-33%. The shrinkage produced by Single Bond was significantly greater (p<0.05) than that produced by the other adhesives. The UTS of One-Step was significantly higher (<0.05) than that of Prime & Bond NT (42.0+/-13.6 vs 29.7+/-1.9 MPa, respectively), with Single Bond producing intermediate UTS (34.3+/-7.4 MPa). SIGNIFICANCE: If the durability of resin-dentin bonds depends upon the size of interfibrillar spaces for both diffusion channels and resin uptake, then adhesive formulations should be designed to minimize matrix shrinkage during resin infiltration.     

Evaporation of solvent in one-bottle adhesives

OBJECTIVE: To compare the evaporation of vehicles included in different single-bottle adhesives as a function of time. METHODS: The following adhesives were used: Prime and Bond 2.1 (Dentsply); Single Bond (3M); PrimaBond 97' (BJM); Syntac Sprint (Vivadent); Optibond Solo (Kerr) and Syntac Single Component (Vivadent). Two primers that are used in multiple-component adhesives (PermaQuick Primer, Ultradent and Scotchbond Multipurpose Primer, 3M) as well as distilled water, 96% ethanol and acetone were also included in the experiment. Samples of these products were stored in small glass containers under controlled temperature and humidity conditions. Initials mass and mass after different periods of time were registered to calculate the percentage loss of mass. RESULTS: The analysis of variance of the results followed by orthogonal contrast comparisons revealed a significantly higher loss of mass in the single-bottle adhesives that contain organic vehicles (especially in those in which the vehicle was acetone). A somewhat lower loss of mass was found in a water-based product. CONCLUSION: There is a relationship among the evaporation possibilities of the vehicles used in single-bottle adhesive systems and their loss of mass during storage.     

Shear bond strengths of one-bottle adhesives to oil-contaminated enamel

PURPOSE: To evaluate resin bond strength to enamel contaminated with handpiece oil. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Bovine teeth were randomly assigned to six groups of 20 teeth each for treatment with one of six different bonding systems (five one-bottle and one multibottle). For each system, 10 enamel specimens were contaminated with handpiece oil before acid-etching and 10 were contaminated after acid-etching. The enamel was etched for 15 seconds using 35% phosphoric acid. Following adhesive application, composite resin was bonded using a gelatin capsule technique. Shear bond strengths from the two contaminated groups were compared to bond strengths to uncontaminated enamel obtained from a previous study that was performed by the same group of investigators, using the same facility, materials, and methods. RESULTS: Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) showed that the factor "surface contamination" did not have a significant effect on bond strength (p > .542). The type of adhesive and the interaction of adhesive and surface contamination were significant (p < .0001 and p < .003, respectively). When oil was applied before etching, mean bond strengths ranged from 18.0 +/- 4.8 MPa for OptiBond SOLO (Kerr Corp., Orange, California) to 25.3 +/- 5.6 MPa for Tenure Quik with Fluoride (Den-Mat Corp., Santa Maria, California). With oil applied after etching, bond strengths ranged from 18.4 +/- 8.0 MPa for Tenure Quik with Fluoride to 27.4 +/- 5.4 MPa for Single Bond (3M Dental Products, St. Paul, Minnesota). For the same adhesive, comparing uncontaminated and "oil-before-etch" contaminated groups, the only statistically significant difference in bond strengths was for OptiBond SOLO: 21.8 +/- 4.0 MPa (uncontaminated) versus 18.0 +/- 4.8 MPa (oil before etch). Comparing uncontaminated and "oil-after-etch" groups, the only statistically significant difference was for Tenure: 24.5 +/- 5.7 MPa (uncontaminated) and 18.4 +/- 8.0 MPa (oil after etch).     

Effect of water on bonding of one-bottle self-etching adhesives

This study evaluated the effect of water on dentin substrate bonding of one-bottle self-etching adhesives. Dentin substrates were divided into two groups: wet and dry dentin. Wet dentin is the normal substrate for bond testing whereas dry dentin was dehydrated in a desiccator for 24 hours. Bonded dehydrated teeth were then divided into two subgroups: stored in water or in desiccator for 24 hours. Microtensile bond strength of resin to dentin was measured using three one-bottle self-etching adhesives. In addition, nanoleakage evaluation was performed through the analyses of SEM and TEM micrographs. The bond strength of dry-dentin group was significantly greater than that of wet-dentin. Further, the amount of nanoleakage within the adhesive interface of dry-dentin group was less than that of wet-dentin. Results showed that bond strength and nanoleakage formation depended on the bonding substrate (wet versus dry dentin) before bonding. One-bottle self-etching adhesives might suck the water from dentinal tubules during bonding by osmosis, leading to nanoleakage formation and thus a decline in bond strength.     

Shear bond strengths of one-bottle adhesives to moist enamel.

PURPOSE: This study evaluated bond strengths of six one-bottle bonding agents and a control (primer plus unfilled resin) to moist enamel. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One-hundred and five bovine teeth were randomly assigned to seven groups of 15. Enamel was etched for 15 seconds with 35% phosphoric acid. Etched enamel was rinsed, and excess water was blotted with tissue paper. Following application of the adhesive, composite resin was bonded using a gelatin capsule technique. Shear bond strengths to enamel were determined using a universal testing machine (Instron Corp., Canton, Massachusetts). RESULTS: Mean bond strengths ranged from 21.9 MPa for OptiBond Solo (Kerr Corp., Orange, California) to 29.6 MPa for Prime & Bond 2.1 (Dentsply/Caulk, Milford, Delaware). Prime & Bond 2.1 had a significantly higher mean bond strength than the other adhesives. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: The results of this study suggest that all of the one-bottle systems tested should provide clinically acceptable bonding to moist enamel.     

后牙超瓷聚体嵌体3年临床疗效观察

目的:观察后牙超瓷聚体嵌体的临床疗效。方法:前磨牙及磨牙Ⅰ类洞患者345例,随机分为2组:超瓷聚体嵌体组170例(前磨牙42颗,磨牙128颗),复合树脂嵌体组175例(前磨牙45颗,磨牙130颗)作为对照。随访3年后,从边缘着色、边缘密合度、解剖形态、基牙继发龋、修复体折裂、颜色匹配等方面进行比较,采用χ2检验进行统计学处理。结果:超瓷聚体嵌体组获得随访166例、复合树脂嵌体组获得随访169例,超瓷聚体嵌体组边缘着色2例、边缘密合158例、外形完整162例、基牙继发龋1例、修复体折裂5例、颜色匹配161例;复合树脂嵌体组边缘着色27例、边缘密合134例、外形完整150例、基牙继发龋20例、修复体折裂5例、颜色匹配146例。超瓷聚体嵌体组在边缘着色、边缘密合度、外形完整、基牙继发龋、颜色匹配等方面优于复合树脂嵌体(P<0.05),但在修复体折裂方面无显著差异(P>0.05)。结论:超瓷聚体嵌体是一种较好的新型牙体修复体。