腹腔镜手术治疗食管裂孔疝45例

目的探讨腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补联合抗反流手术治疗食管裂孔疝的疗效。方法 2004年5月~2008年11月45例食管裂孔疝行腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补联合抗反流手术。采用视觉模拟积分(visual analogue scales,VAS)评价术前及术后1、6、12个月胃食管反流症状,包括烧心、吞咽梗阻、反酸、胸痛、嗳气等。结果在缝合缩小食管裂孔的同时,行改良Nissen术9例,Toupet术10例,Dor术26例。无中转开腹。手术时间92~203min,平均118min。术后住院2~8d,平均2.7d。术后发生胃潴留3例,吞咽梗阻2例。术后随访1~48个月,平均21.5月,2例分别在术后1、12个月复发。胃食管反流综合症状VAS评分术前中位数5分(4~8分),术后1、6、12个月中位数均为1分,术前后比较均有统计学意义(P=0.000)。结论腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补联合抗反流手术是治疗食管裂孔疝的有效方法 ,具有创伤小、恢复快的特点。     

腹腔镜下治疗食管裂孔疝55例报告

目的：探讨腹腔镜下治疗食管裂孔疝的可行性和有效性。方法2008年3月～2013年3月腹腔镜手术治疗55例食管裂孔疝,腹腔镜下完成食管裂孔疝的还纳及修补之后,进一步行胃底折叠术。结果55例均在腹腔镜下完成手术,在食管裂孔修补基础上辅以不同的胃底折叠术,其中Nissen胃底折叠术17例,Toupet 胃底折叠术19例,Dor胃底折叠术19例。3种术式的手术时间：Nissen术式（69．6±13．0）min,Toupet术式（68．0±8．2）min,Dor术式（63．8±10．1）min;3种术式的术中出血量：Nissen术式（20．0±5．8）ml,Toupet术式（20．6±9．5）ml,Dor术式（21．7±5．0）ml,无一例输血;3种术式的术后拔管时间：Nissen术式（3．1±1．1） d,Toupet术式（2．7±0．7） d,Dor术式（2．3±1．1） d;3种术式的术后住院时间：Nissen术式（9．1±4．9）d,Toupet术式（8．4±2．6）d,Dor术式（7．6±1．5）d。术后患者的临床症状均得到有效缓解,无围术期死亡,3例（5．4％）出现术后并发症,其中2例胃排空障碍,1例吞咽困难,治疗后均缓解。55例中位随访时间45个月（6～60个月）,口服钡餐造影或胃镜等检查无食管裂孔疝复发,无食管狭窄和食管憩室发生。结论腹腔镜下治疗食管裂孔疝安全有效,可根据病人的情况选择不同的胃底折叠术。     

118例食管裂孔疝的手术治疗

1986年10月至2000年12月间，我们共手术治疗食管裂孔疝病人118例，现报道如下。     

腹腔镜手术治疗新生儿食管裂孔疝11例报告北大核心CSCD

目的探讨腹腔镜手术治疗新生儿食管裂孔疝(产前超声诊断)的临床效果。方法回顾性分析2015年5月~2021年1月我科11例新生儿(男7例,女4例)食管裂孔疝(产前超声诊断)的临床资料。手术时患儿年龄2~94 d(中位数4 d)。体重(2.82±0.51)kg。出生后胸部CT、上消化道造影明确诊断,采用腹腔镜下四孔法行食管裂孔疝修补、胃底折叠术,其中9例Nissen术,2例Thal术。结果11例均在腹腔镜下完成手术,无中转开腹手术。9例Nissen术,手术时间(173.0±43.8)min;2例Thal术的手术时间分别为184、206 min。术后恢复进食时间(2.5±1.2)d。住院时间(14.1±4.1)d。11例患儿随访7~74个月,中位随访28个月,术后食管裂孔疝无复发,身高、体重与同龄儿无明显差别,无明显呕吐,无纳奶呛咳。结论新生儿期行腹腔镜手术治疗产前诊断的食管裂孔疝是安全可靠的。     

腹腔镜治疗食管裂孔疝的麻醉

目的探讨腹腔镜行食管裂孔疝修补术对全身麻醉患者血流动力学、呼吸及动脉血气的影响。方法选择了62例（ASAI—II）食管裂孔疝患者使用腹腔镜行食管裂孔疝修补术,监测气腹前,气腹后30min血压（BP）、心率（HR）、心电图（ECG）、脉搏、氧饱和度（SPO2）及动脉血气、气道压力的变化。结果62例腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术全部获得成功。气腹前、后患者的血流动力学变化不明显（P〉0．05）,气道压力,动脉血气发生显著改变,出现高碳酸血症（P〈0．05）。结论腹腔镜行食管裂孔疝修补术CO2气腹对全身麻醉患者呼吸及血气产生一定的影响,术中应加强麻醉的管理及监测。     

腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术的初步探讨

目的探讨腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补和胃底折叠术（Toupet手术）治疗食管裂孔疝的临床效果。方法 2009年1月～2010年5月,21例患者行腹腔镜食管裂孔疝（Ⅰ型9例,Ⅱ型4例,Ⅲ型6例,Ⅳ型2例）修补,采用单纯缝合膈肌脚,补片完全缝合,补片缝合加钉合等方法修补食管裂孔疝,并同期行部分胃底折叠术。结果本组患者手术均获成功,手术时间85～170min。无中转开腹及死亡病例。术后平均住院7d。术后随访1～16个月,20例临床症状完全消失,1例改善不明显,无明确复发病例。结论腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补和胃底折叠术安全有效,应根据患者情况采用个体化的修补方式。     

腹腔镜治疗食管裂孔疝的临床应用

食管裂孔疝多见于40岁以上的患者,传统的开腹手术创伤大、恢复慢,患者难以接受。随着腹腔镜技术的不断成熟,在欧美国家腹腔镜治疗食管裂孔疝已是除腹腔镜胆囊切除术以外较常做的腹腔镜手术。     

腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术并发症的预防

目的探讨使用腹腔镜行食管裂孔疝修补术的疗效和安全性。减少手术并发症,随访腹腔镜治疗食道裂孔疝的效果。方法对280例食管裂孔疝患者使用腹腔镜行食管裂孔疝修补术,其中132例做胃底270°部分折叠术（Toupet术）,148例做胃底360°折叠术（Nissen术）。36例应用补片修补疝缺口,剩余患者采用直接缝合。结果 280例腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术全部获得成功。手术时间30～190min,平均手术时间110min,失血10～50ml;术后24～48h进流质饮食,无术后并发症;术后平均住院5.7d。结论腹腔镜食道裂孔疝修补术具有疗效确定、安全和创伤小的优点。并发症率极低。     

腹腔镜治疗食管裂孔疝的初步临床经验

目的总结腹腔镜手术治疗食管裂孔疝的初步经验。方法2004年5月~2005年4月,食管裂孔疝15例行腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补加抗反流手术。Ⅰ型4例均伴有严重的胃食管反流,Ⅱ型10例,Ⅲ型1例。在缝合缩小食管裂孔的同时,行N issen术9例,Toupet术4例,Dor术2例。采用视觉模拟积分(visual analogue scales,VAS)评价术前及术后1、6个月胃食管反流症状,包括烧心、吞咽梗阻、反酸、胸痛、嗳气等。结果全组无中转开腹。手术时间100~187 m in,平均125 m in。术后住院2~5 d,平均2.8 d。术后随访1~12个月,平均8.5月,无疝复发。胃食管反流综合症状VAS评分术前5.0±3.9,术后1个月降至0.9±1.3(t=3.823,P<0.05),术后6个月降至0.8±1.6(t=3.549,P<0.05)。术后并发胃潴留2例,吞咽梗阻1例,3个月后缓解。结论采用腹腔镜技术手术治疗食管裂孔疝具有创伤小、恢复快的特点,其短期临床效果满意。     

腹腔镜手术治疗食管裂孔疝的42体会

目的探讨使用腹腔镜行食管裂孔疝修补术的疗效和安全性。方法对42例食管裂孔疝患者行腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术,其中32例行胃底360°折叠术(Nissen术),10例行胃底270°部分折叠术(Toupet术)。39例采用4号丝线缝合修补疝缺口,3例应用补片修补疝缺口。结果42例腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术全部成功。手术时间平均(138±22)min,失血平均(62±16)ml;无术后并发症;术后平均住院(5.2±1.9)d。术后症状完全消失32例(76%),好转10例(24%)。结论腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术具有疗效确定、安全和创伤小的优点,值得进一步推广应用。     

Recurrent paraesophageal hernia due to diaphragm rupture: a case report

A 58-year-old male patient was operated for complaints of dysphagia, anemia and retrosternal discomfort due to a type II hiatal hernia. A complete hernia sac excision and posterior crural repair was performed laparoscopically with support of the da Vinci™ robotic system. An antireflux procedure was not performed because of the absence of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Nine months after surgery the patient presented with recurrent complaints of dysphagia and retrosternal pain. Barium esophagram series revealed a recurrent paraesophageal hernia which was confirmed on esophagogastroscopy. A robot-assisted re-laparoscopy was performed. Left to the still intact hiatoplasty of the original operation a tear in the diaphragm, through which part of the stomach covered with peritoneum had herniated, was encountered. The hernia sac was excised, the diaphragmatic defect closed and reinforced with an expanded polytetrafluoroethylene strip of 5×8 cm. After surgery the patient recovered quickly, oral intake was resumed on the first postoperative day and the hospital stay was 3 days. The use of prosthetic mesh to reinforce the hiatoplasty and the addition of an antireflux procedure after hiatal hernia repair are ongoing controversial aspects of hiatal hernia repair. Reports on laparoscopic redo surgery for recurrent diaphragmatic hernia are limited and will be addressed in this case report, in perspective of the aforementioned controversial components.     

Comparison of patient-centered outcomes after laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease or paraesophageal hernia

Background Patients undergoing laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication (LNF) with paraesophageal hernias (PEH) are not only older and less healthy than those with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), but in addition the repair is more complicated. We evaluated whether outcomes relating to GERD symptoms and quality of life (QOL) were impacted by the presence of PEH. Methods Prospectively entered data from 149 patients (109 GERD and 40 PEH) were evaluated prior to and one year after LNF with standardized and validated symptoms scores. Scores for heartburn, dysphagia, disease-specific QOL (GERD-HRQL), and general health-related QOL (SF-12 physical and mental component scores) were compared between patients undergoing LNF for PEH or for GERD alone, at baseline and one year after surgery. p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results Preoperative data for GERD-HRQL, heartburn, and dysphagia were available for 134 patients, with 96% one-year follow-up. SF-12 data were collected for 98 patients with 100% follow-up. PEH patients were older and had greater comorbidity. Preoperative GERD-HRQL and heartburn were significantly worse in the GERD group. One year after surgery, both GERD and PEH patients showed significant improvement in GERD-HRQL, heartburn and dysphagia scores, with no difference in any of these disease or symptom measures between the two study groups. Postoperative PCS and MCS scores showed improvement in GERD patients, while PEH patient scores remained at or below the population mean. Conclusions LNF is equally effective as an antireflux procedure in both GERD and PEH patients, prevents symptoms of reflux in PEH patients that have none preoperatively, and does not increase dysphagia in either group. Despite the increased complexity of the procedure, LNF provides an effective control of reflux symptoms in patients undergoing PEH repair. Supported by an unrestricted educational grant from Tyco Healthcare Canada     

Clinical and radiologic assessment of laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair

Background: Unlike sliding hiatal hernias, paraesophageal hiatal hernias (PEH) present a risk of catastrophic complications and should be repaired. To assess laparoscopic repair of PEH, we prospectively evaluated the outcome of 38 consecutive patients with type II (20 patients) or III (18 patients) PEH treated laparoscopically. Methods: With the use of 5 or 6 ports, laparoscopic PEH reduction and repair was attempted. One patient (3%) was converted to an open procedure. In the first 12 patients, the hiatus was closed using varying techniques including the placement of prothestic mesh in 6 patients, and the hernia sac was not routinely excised. In the next 25 patients, the hernia sac always was excised and the hiatus routinely sutured posteriorly to the esophagus. Twenty-nine patients also underwent either a Nissen (n= 27) or Toupet (n= 2) fundoplication, which is now performed routinely. Sutured anterior gastropexy was performed selectively in 10 of the first 20 patients, then routinely, using T-fasteners in the last 17 patients. Barium swallow studies were performed on all patients at 3 to 5 months postoperatively. Results: Mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM) age was 67 ± 2 year (range, 39–92 years; 11 men, 27 women), and the American Society of Anesthesia (ASA) score was 2.5 ± 0.1. The operating time was 195 ± 10 min: 244 ± 15 min in the first 12 patients and 170 ± 11 min in the last 25 patients (p < 0.001). There were three (8%) intraoperation complications, which were treated without sequelae, and four (11%) grade II postoperation morbidities. Median discharge was 3 days, and return to full activity was 14 days. Two patients (5%) died of cardiovascular disease after discharge. Barium swallow revealed 2/35 (6%) PEH recurrences (1 reoperated), 3 (9%) intrathoracic wraps, and 3 (9%) small sliding hiatal hernias. At follow-up of 1 year or more, 6/28 (21%) patients noted mild symptoms of reflux or bloating, but only 1 patient (4%) required medication for these symptoms. Conclusions: Laparoscopic PEH repair offers a reasonable alternative to traditional surgery, especially for high-risk patients. Rapid recovery is achieved with acceptable morbidity and early outcome. Barium x-rays revealed hiatal abnormalities in a significant fraction of patients, many of whom were asymptomatic. Longer follow-up will be required to determine the ideal strategy for management of these patients. Received: 4 April 1998/Accepted: 9 December 1998     

Laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair with acellular dermal matrix cruroplasty

Background:

Laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair (LPEHR) has been shown to be both safe and efficacious. Compulsory operative steps include reduction of the stomach from the mediastinum, resection of the mediastinal hernia sac, ensuring an appropriate intraabdominal esophageal length, and crural closure. The use of mesh materials in the repair of hiatal hernias remains controversial. Synthetic mesh may reduce hernia recurrences, but may increase postoperative dysphagia and result in esophageal erosion. Human acellular dermal matrix (HADM) may reduce the incidence of hernia recurrence with reduced complications compared with synthetic mesh.

Methods:

A retrospective review of all cases of laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair using HADM from December 2008 through March 2010 at a single institution was performed evaluating demographic information, BMI, operative times, length of stay, and complications.

Discussion:

Forty-six LPEHRs with HADM were identified. The mean age of patients was 60.3 years (±13.9); BMI 30.3 (±5.3); operative time 182 minutes (±56); and length of stay 2.6 days (±1.9). Nine of 46 (19.6%) patients experienced perioperative complications, including subcutaneous emphysema without pneumothorax (n=2), urinary retention (n=1), COPD exacerbation (n=2), early dysphagia resolving before discharge (n=1), esophageal perforation (n=1), delayed gastric perforation occurring 30 days postoperatively associated with gas bloat syndrome (n=1), and PEG site abscess (n=1). There were 2 clinically recurrent hernias (4.3%). Radiographic recurrences occurred in 2 of 26 patients (7.7%). Six of 46 (13%) patients reported persistent dysphagia.

Conclusion:

LPEHR with HADM crural reinforcement is an effective method of repairing symptomatic paraesophageal hernias with low perioperative morbidity. Recurrences occur infrequently with this technique. No mesh-related complications were seen in this series.     

Anterior gastropexy may reduce the recurrence rate after laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair

Background: Although laparoscopic repair of type 3 paraesophageal hernias is safe and results in symptomatic relief, recent data have questioned the anatomic integrity of the laparoscopic approach. The reports document an asymptomatic recurrence rate as high as 42% with radiologic follow-up evaluation for type 3 paraesophageal hernias repaired laparoscopically. This disturbingly high recurrence rate has prompted the addition of an anterior gastropexy to our standard laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair. Methods: A prospective series of 28 patients underwent laparoscopic repair of large type 3 hiatal hernias between July 2000 and January 2002 at the Cleveland Clinic Foundation by one surgeon. All the patients underwent reduction of the hernia, sac excision, crural repair, antireflux procedure, and anterior gastropexy. They all had a video esophagram 24 h after surgery, then at 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-up visits and annually thereafter. Symptomatic outcomes were assessed with a standard questionnaire at each follow-up visit. Results: In this study, 21 women and 7 men with a mean age of 67 years (range, 35–82 years) underwent successful laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair. The mean operative time was 146 min (range, 101–186 min), and the average blood loss was 71 ml (range, 10–200 ml). One intraoperative complication occurred: A small esophageal mucosal tear occurred during esophageal dissection and was repaired laparoscopically. At 24 h, upper gastrointestinal examination identified no leaks. At this writing, all the patients have undergone video esophagram at a 3-month follow-up visit. All were asymptomatic and all examinations were normal. Of the 28 patients, 27 have undergone follow-up assessment at 6 months. At this writing, all the patients have undergone video esophagram at 3, 6, and 12 months follow up visits. All were asymptomatic and all examinations were normal. Ten patients have completed 2 year follow up barium swallows with no recurrences. Conclusions: With up to 2 years of follow-up evaluation, the addition of an anterior gastropexy to the laparoscopic repair of type 3 hiatal hernias resulted in no recurrences. These encouraging results necessitate further follow-up evaluation to document the long-term effects of anterior gastropexy in reducing postoperative recurrence after laparoscopic repair of paraesophageal hernias.     

�����޲�Ƕ����ʳ���ѿ���5�����

目的 探讨食管裂孔疝的诊治方法及经腹修补术式。方法 对5例嵌顿性食管裂孔疝经腹修补的病人进行回顾性分析。结果 5例病人均经手术明确诊断，并选择了相应的术式，除1例术后仍有返流梗阻症状外，其余4例效果均满意。结论 经腹途径施行裂孔疝修补简便易行，疗效满意，能同时处理腹内其它疾病，可作为首选术式。     

Short-term outcome of laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair

Background: The purpose of this study is to determine the morbidity, mortality, and short-term outcomes associated with laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair (LPHR). Methods: A series of 58 consecutive LPHRs performed by the author were reviewed with an average 1-year follow-up. Morbidity and mortality rates were compared with historical series of open repairs. Anatomy and technical considerations pertinent to LPHR were reviewed. Results: There were no procedure-related or perioperative deaths in this series of patients undergoing LPHR. Four major complications occurred (7%), two of which required reoperation, all in urgently repaired patients. One patient required conversion to laparotomy (1.7%). Based on symptoms, there were no reherniations. No patients had long-term dysphagia worse than preoperatively. Preoperative symptoms of chest pain, esophageal obstruction, hemorrhage, and reflux were resolved in all patients. Conclusions: LPHR is safe, effective, and compares favorably to historical series of open paraesophageal hernia repair. Received: 24 July 1996/Accepted: 20 November 1996     

腹腔镜胃底180°前折叠术治疗食管裂孔疝疗效分析

目的探讨腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补联合胃底180°前折叠术治疗食管裂孔疝疾病的可行性和安全性。方法回顾性分析了沧州市中西医结合医院与天津南开医院2008年9月至2013年6月采用腹腔镜技术治疗的180例食管裂孔疝患者资料,其中30例应用补片修补裂孔,剩余患者丝线缝合裂孔,均加做胃底180°前折叠（Dor手术）。结果手术顺利,无中转开腹者。术后随访3～60个月,手术效果满意率92.31％,术后3个月复查胃镜、上消化道造影等检查基本恢复正常。其中7例患者术后早期出现轻度反酸、烧心症状,均在4个月内通过保守治疗好转,无复发病例,无严重吞咽困难病例。结论腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补和胃底180°前折叠术治疗食管裂孔疝疾病有微创手术创伤小、恢复快、安全可行、疗效可靠等特点,值得临床广泛应用。     

妇科腹腔镜手术112例临床分析

目的:探讨妇科腹腔镜的适应证。方法:回顾分析2003年2月至2005年3月腹腔镜妇科手术112例的临床资料。结果:除2例中转开腹外,其余手术均顺利完成,无严重并发症发生。结论:适应证掌握得当,仔细操作,妇科大部分手术可在腹腔镜下完成,并能把并发症降至最低。     

腹腔镜食道裂孔疝修补联合胆囊切除术的临床应用探讨

目的探讨腹腔镜下食道裂孔疝修补联合胆囊切除手术的临床应用。方法回顾性分析24例腹腔镜食道裂孔疝修补联合胆囊切除术患者的临床资料。结果 24例均获成功,无并发症发生及中转开腹,术后4～7d痊愈出院。结论腹腔镜下食道裂孔疝修补联合胆囊切除术能安全有效的处理腹部多发病变,在掌握好手术适应证的条件下是安全可行的。