ACE基因I/D多态性与冠状动脉支架内再狭窄相关性研究

目的研究冠状动脉内行药物洗脱支架置入术患者,术后支架内再狭窄发生情况与ACE基因I/D多态性的关系。方法所有患者行冠状动脉造影检查,PCR方法测定ACE基因型。根据血管造影结果分为再狭窄组（病变狭窄≥50%）和无再狭窄组（病变狭窄〈50%）。采用SPSS18.0软件比较再狭窄组与无再狭窄组的临床基本特征、冠脉造影资料,以及与ACE基因型的关系。结果此次研究共纳入396名行药物洗脱支架置入术的冠心病患者,支架内再狭窄发生40例,再狭窄率为10.1%。再狭窄组与无再狭窄组的临床基本资料、冠脉造影资料均无显著性差异（P〉0.05）。再狭窄组的ACEDD基因型35.56%、ACEDI基因型16.39%、ACEII基因型3.85%。再狭窄组与ACE基因I/D多态性具有相关性（P〈0.001）。结论冠状动脉内行药物洗脱支架置入术患者术后支架再狭窄发生与ACEDD基因型具有显著相关性。     

ACE gene polymorphism and coronary restenosis.

In humans, circulating levels of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) are linked with an insertion (I)/deletion (D) polymorphism in the ACE gene: DD genotype bearers have higher levels of ACE than either ID or II genotype bearers. Recent studies have suggested that the ACE DD genotype might be associated with a higher risk of coronary artery disease. The aim of this paper is to review studies on the influence of the I/D polymorphism on coronary restenosis. The renin-angiotensin system has been implicated in the pathogenesis of neointimal hyperplasia in experimental models. In humans, the I/D polymorphism is not associated with restenosis after balloon angioplasty, but is strongly associated with restenosis after coronary stent implantation. This may be explained by the fact that the contribution of neointimal hyperplasia to restenosis is much more important after coronary stent implantation than after balloon angioplasty.     

The relationship between angiotensin converting enzyme gene polymorphism, coronary artery disease, and stent restenosis: the role of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors in stent restenosis in patients with diabetes mellitus

Patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) have advanced atherosclerosis compared with nondiabetics. Restenosis after intracoronary stent implantation occurs frequently in diabetic patients. Angiotensin II is an important growth factor for the development of neointimal hyperplasia after vascular injury. The aim of our study was to evaluate the relationships between angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) gene insertion/deletion (I/D) polymorphism and coronary artery disease (CAD) and stent restonosis in diabetic patients. One hundred and thirty consecutive patients with CAD and 47 consecutive patients (14 males, mean age, 58.0 +/- 10.0) without CAD were enrolled in the study. All patients had type 2 (noninsulin dependent) DM. The patients with CAD underwent percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) and stenting. Ninety-four (59 males, mean age, 60.3 +/- 9.8) underwent control coronary angiography at the end of the follow-up period (mean duration, 9.1 +/- 2.9 months). ACE gene I/D genotyping was identified in all patients. No significant difference was found among patients with and without CAD with respect to ACE gene I/D polymorphism (P = 0.460). In the control coronary angiography, stent restenosis and new lesion development were comparable in each genotyping subgroup. However, a significant relationship was observed between restenosis and the use of ACE inhibitors (ACEI) in patients with D allele (ACEI ratio, 43.5% in the restenosis group and 56.5% in non-restenotic group, P < 0.05). We did not find any relationship between ACE gene I/D polymorphism and CAD and stent restenosis and new lesion development in diabetic patients. On the other hand, ACEI treatment may reduce stent restenosis in type 2 diabetic patients with D allele (DD or ID).     

Angiotensin I-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and restenosis after coronary artery stenting in patients with the DD genotype of the ACE gene

OBJECTIVES: We tested the hypothesis that patients with the DD genotype of the angiotensin I-converting enzyme (ACE) gene who are treated with ACE inhibitors are at a higher risk of restenosis after coronary stent placement than patients who do not receive ACE inhibitors. BACKGROUND: Two recent studies with a limited series of patients carrying the DD genotype suggested an unfavorable impact of the use of ACE inhibitors on the restenotic process after implantation of stents in coronary arteries. Because these findings may question the use of ACE inhibitors after coronary stenting, we examined this important issue in a large series of patients. METHODS: We determined the ACE gene I/D genotype of 2,222 consecutive patients with symptomatic coronary artery disease who underwent stent implantation. The patients with the DD genotype (n = 612) constituted the study population. The primary end point was in-stent restenosis, which was assessed as angiographic restenosis (> or =50% diameter stenosis at six-month follow-up) and clinical restenosis (need for target vessel revascularization due to symptoms or signs of ischemia in the presence of angiographic restenosis over one year after the intervention). RESULTS: Of the 612 patients with the DD genotype, 403 (65.8%) were treated with ACE inhibitors and 209 (34.2%) did not receive ACE inhibitors. The angiographic and clinical restenosis rates were not significantly different between the group treated with ACE inhibitors and the group not receiving ACE inhibitors (p = 0.55). Continuous measures of restenosis, minimal lumen diameter, diameter stenosis, late lumen loss, and loss index were also similar in both groups (p > or = 0.55). In addition, one-year survival free of myocardial infarction was not significantly different between the two groups (p = 0.27). CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to previous reports, our study provides evidence that patients carrying the DD genotype are not exposed to an increased risk of restenosis after stent placement when treated with ACE inhibitors.     

Predictors of coronary in-stent restenosis: importance of angiotensin-converting enzyme gene polymorphism and treatment with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to clarify the role of the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) gene polymorphism in the development of in-stent restenosis. BACKGROUND: In-stent restenosis occurs after treatment of coronary artery stenosis in 12% to 32% of coronary interventions with stents. Experimental and clinical studies have suggested that the deletion/insertion (D/I) polymorphism of the ACE gene plays a role in this. METHODS: Quantitative coronary angiography before, immediately after and six months after stent implantation were compared in 369 patients, in whom D/I typing of the ACE gene was performed. RESULTS: At follow-up we found no differences between the three genotypes in minimal lumen diameter (homozygotes with two deletion alleles in the ACE gene [DD], 2.20 mm; heterozygotes with one deletion and one insertion allele in the ACE gene [DI], 2.19 mm; and homozygotes with two insertion alleles in the ACE gene [II], 2.25 mm). The corresponding diameter stenoses were: DD: 25%, DI: 27%, II: 27% (p = NS), and the frequency of restenosis (>50% diameter stenosis) was: DD: 15.7%, DI: 11.0% and II: 16.4% (p = NS). Logistic regression analysis identified diabetes (odds ratio [OR]: 3.0, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.0 to 8.7), lesion length (OR: 1.1, 95% CI: 1.01 to 1.30) and minimal lumen diameter immediately after the intervention (OR: 0.3, 95% CI: 0.14 to 0.85) as predictors of in-stent restenosis. In a post hoc analysis of patients treated versus those not treated with an ACE-inhibitor antagonist or an angiotensin receptor antagonist, we found an increased frequency of in-stent restenosis in the DD genotypes (40% vs. 12%, p = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: The D/I polymorphism is not an independent predictor of coronary in-stent restenosis in general, but it may be of clinical importance in patients treated with ACE inhibitors or angiotensin receptor antagonists.     

D/D genotype of the gene for angiotensin converting enzyme as a risk factor for post-stent coronary restenosis]

INTRODUCTION: Although intracoronary stenting has decreased restenosis rate compared to percutaneous balloon angioplasty, still a high number of patients develop in-stent restenosis, which is an entity primarily due to tissue proliferation. Experimental studies have indicated that the renin-angiotensin system is involved in neointimal hyperplasia. Plasma and cellular levels of ACE are associated with an I/D polymorphism in the ACE gene. Indeed, DD subjects have the higher ACE levels. The purpose of this study was to explore the possibility that the I/D polymorphism might be related with in-stent restenosis. METHODS: We studied the ACE polymorphism in 48 consecutive patients who underwent successful implantation of an elective coronary stent in native coronary vessels and had a 6 month angiographic follow up. Restenosis (50% of the reference vessel) was observed in 23/48 patients. Patients with or without restenosis did not differ in demographic or clinical variables like diabetes, plasma cholesterol levels or in quantitative angiographic parameters such as vessel reference size or minimal lumen diameter after stent implantation. RESULTS: I/D polymorphism was distributed as follows: 22.9% of the patients were D/D; 14.5% were I/I and 62.5% of the patients were heterozygous I/D. The presence of restenosis was strongly related with the I/D polymorphism: 81.8% of the patients with D/D genotype had restenosis, compared with 40.0% of I/D patients and only 14.2% of the I/I patients (chi 2 p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: In this limited cohort, homocygous D/D of the ACE gene was significantly associated with in-stent restenosis, whereas restenosis was infrequent in patients with the I/I genotype.     

Lack of association between the insertion/deletion polymorphism of the angiotensin-converting enzyme gene and vasospastic angina

Background and hypothesis: It has been suggested that the insertion/deletion (I/D) polymorphism of the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) gene is an independent risk factor for coronary atherosclerosis and myocardial infarction, but its relation to vasospastic angina has not been fully proven. In the present study, we investigated the possible relationship between the ACE I/D genotype and vasospastic angina. Methods: We explored the distribution of the ACE genotype in 20 patients with vasospastic angina without fixed coronary artery stenosis, 55 angina patients with fixed coronary artery stenosis, and 30 control subjects without coronary artery disease. Results: The frequency of the DD genotype in patients with vasospastic angina (DD: 30.0%, ID: 20.0%, II: 50.0%) did not differ from that in the control subjects (DD: 23.3%, ID: 26.7%, II: 50.0%), while the frequency in patients with coronary artery stenosis (DD: 43.7%, ID: 21.8%, II: 34.5%) was significantly higher than that in the control subjects. The frequency of the D allele also did not differ between patients with vasospastic angina (0.40) and control subjects (0.37), while the frequency was significantly higher in patients with coronary artery stenosis (0.55). Conclusions: These findings suggest that the ACE DD genotype is a potent genetic risk factor for organic coronary artery disease, while it confers no appreciable increase in risk of vasospastic angina. These results also suggest the diversity of the pathogenesis of vascular lesions in these two types of coronary artery disease.     

Angiotensin-converting enzyme gene polymorphism influences degree of left ventricular hypertrophy and its regression in patients undergoing operation for aortic stenosis.

Insertion (I)/deletion (D) polymorphism of the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) gene has been associated with increased left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) in patients with cardiomyopathy and congestive heart failure. Patients with aortic stenosis (AS) have varying degrees of LVH at a given valve area. The aim of this study was to examine the relation between ACE gene polymorphism and the degree of LVH in patients undergoing operation for AS. Eighty-two patients who underwent operation for AS with a stentless valve were followed prospectively with echocardiographic assessments of left ventricular mass index (LVMI). ACE gene polymorphism was determined by polymerase chain reaction. The genotype (DD, ID, and II) frequency was the same as in healthy controls. The pressure difference across the aortic valve did not differ between genotypes. Patients with the DD genotype of the ACE gene had a higher LVMI (197 +/- 47 g/m2) preoperatively than those with ID (175 +/- 41 g/m2) or II (155 +/- 43 g/m2) genotypes (p = 0.01). LVMI decreased significantly in DD (p <0.001) and ID (p <0.001) genotypes but not in the II genotype during follow-up (mean 15 months). There was a significant difference in regression of LVMI over time between genotypes (p = 0.0056), with no significant difference between genotypes at follow-up. The DD genotype of the ACE gene is associated with increased preoperative LVH in patients treated surgically for AS. The DD genotype appears to be an important factor which increases hypertrophic myocardial reactivity to pressure overload.     

The association between angiotensin-converting enzyme gene polymorphism and coronary calcification. The Rotterdam Coronary Calcification Study

BACKGROUND: An insertion/deletion (I/D) polymorphism in the gene encoding angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) has been associated with serum ACE levels. The association between the ACE I/D polymorphism and coronary heart disease is unclear. Electron-beam-computed tomography (EBT) is a technique to non-invasively quantify the amount of coronary calcification. We investigated the association between the ACE I/D polymorphism and coronary calcification. METHODS AND RESULTS: The Rotterdam Coronary Calcification Study is a population-based study in subjects aged 55 years and over. EBT scanning was performed in 2013 participants. Coronary calcification was quantified according to the Agatston score. The ACE I/D polymorphism was available for 1976 subjects. Geometric mean calcium scores in men with the II, ID and DD genotype were 167, 207 and 219, respectively. However, the difference in calcium score (p=0.19 for ID versus II; p=0.15 for DD versus II) and the trend (ptrend=0.17) were not significant. Calcium scores in women with the II, ID and DD genotype were 44, 42 and 36, respectively. There were no significant differences in calcium score (p=0.78 for ID versus II; p=0.29 for DD versus II), neither was the trend (ptrend=0.27). After we stratified on cardiovascular risk factors, no associations were present. CONCLUSION: The present study failed to show an association between the ACE I/D polymorphism and coronary calcification in the general population. Also, no significant associations were present between the ACE I/D polymorphism and coronary calcification in strata of cardiovascular risk factors.     

Angiotensin-converting enzyme gene polymorphism and coronary heart disease in Turkish type 2 diabetic patients

OBJECTIVE: It has been suggested that the insertion (I)/deletion (D) polymorphism of the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) may be associated with atherosclerosis.The aim of the study was to examine the association between ACE gene polymorphism and coronary heart disease in Turkish type 2 diabetic patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 152 (97 female, 55 male) type 2 diabetic patients were included into the study. All patients underwent myocardial perfusion scintigraphic examination and forty-five of them with a perfusion defect underwent coronary angiography.Thirty-eight patients with a coronary stenosis of more than 50% on coronary angiography were considered as having coronary heart disease.The I/D polymorphism was determined by polymerase chain reaction.There was no statistically significant difference in genotypic and allelic frequencies of the ACE I/D polymorphism among patients with and without coronary heart disease (DD:ID:II (%), 32:58:11 and 39:44:17, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: ACE gene polymorphism is not a significant parameter to determine coronary heart disease in Turkish type 2 diabetic patients.     

Quinapril prevents restenosis after coronary stenting in patients with angiotensin-converting enzyme D allele.

Restenosis after coronary artery stent implantation is attributed chiefly to intimal hyperplasia, which is prevented experimentally by angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors. Therefore, the present study investigated whether the effect of quinapril, a tissue-specific ACE inhibitor, on the prevention of coronary restenosis differs according to ACE polymorphism. One hundred consecutive patients with successful stent implantation were randomly assigned to quinapril and control groups. Both follow-up angiography and ACE polymorphism analysis were obtained from 92 patients (control, 46; quinapril treatment, 46). The prevalence of risk factors did not differ statistically according to quinapril treatment or ACE genotypes. There was no statistically significant difference in the occurrence of restenosis 6 months after stenting between the groups. Quantitative coronary angiography revealed that quinapril treatment resulted in significantly higher minimal lumen diameter and significantly lower percent diameter stenosis (22.9 +/- 22.6 vs 37.1 +/- 19.7% in the control group, p < 0.05) in patients with the D allele although there was no difference in those with the II genotype. In addition, intravascular ultrasound revealed that quinapril treatment significantly prevented the loss of minimal lumen cross-sectional area and the increase in percent area stenosis (34.5 +/- 14.0 vs 53.3 +/- 16.4% in the control group, p < 0.05) in patients with the D allele compared to those with the II genotype. These results suggest that the administration of ACE inhibitors for the attenuation of lumen loss after coronary stent implantation is best for subjects with the D allele of the ACE genotype.     

Intracoronary ultrasound: A necessary tool for stent implantation? Arguments in favor]

Intracoronary ultrasound (ICUS), as opposed to angiography, provides high resolution, tomographic images of the coronary vessel and lumen. Because of its superior diagnostic sensitivity ICUS is indicated in the evaluation of suboptimal results and complications following stent implantation. Only a few years ago the use of stents was limited by a high incidence of subacute thrombosis. ICUS demonstrated that the deployment technique used at that time was inadequate and that stent expansion could be improved by the routine use of high pressure inflation, leading to a simplification in the anticoagulation regimen and a decrease in the subacute thrombosis rate in elective procedures to < or = 1%. However, the routine use of high balloon pressures does not assure an adequate expansion of the stent. Only about one third of the stents deployed under angiographic guidance are optimally expanded, with intra-stent luminal dimensions similar to the adjacent, reference, luminal sizes. Significantly, these underdeployed stents can be recognized by ICUS and a large proportion adequately expanded. It should be emphasized that the best predictors of stent restenosis are two ICUS parameters, the postprocedural luminal dimensions and the % cross sectional narrowing, and not the angiographic parameters. Likewise, two of the lowest restenosis rates ever reported (12.8% and 7.3%) have occurred in two studies (WEST-2 and MUSIC) in which stent deployment was guided by ICUS. Two trials (AVID and OPTICUS) have been specifically designed to test the hypothesis that routine use of ICUS to guide stent implantation could diminish the restenosis rate, but their final results are not yet available. The CRUISE study was designed to evaluate the impact of routine ICUS not on angiographic restenosis but on the clinical need of revascularization. In this trial, the larger luminal dimensions of the stents implanted under ICUS guidance translated into a 40% reduction in the 6 month revascularization rate (14.8% vs. 8.9%, p < 0.05). Although the final answer is still pending, the available information suggests that the routine use of ICUS might translate into a direct clinical benefit, something remarkable for a diagnostic tool. In any case, the most effective way of using ICUS would probably be identifying those lesions that most benefit from the technique and avoiding its use in lesions with, a priori, excellent results.     

Association of the angiotensin-converting enzyme gene polymorphism with chronic heart failure in Chinese Han patients

BACKGROUND: An insertion/deletion (I/D) polymorphism is present in the 16th intron of the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) gene and is associated with serum and tissue ACE level. Some studies have shown that the DD genotype is associated with some cardiovascular diseases; while ACE polymorphism's effect on chronic heart failure (CHF) remains uncertain. AIM: To investigate the association of the ACE gene I/D polymorphism with CHF in the Chinese Han population. METHODS: The genotype was determined by polymerase chain reaction in 102 normal controls and in 79 patients with CHF. Plasma angiotensin (Ang) levels were assessed by radio-immunity assay. Left ventricular end-diastolic diameters (LVDD) and left ventricular ejection fractions were assessed by echocardiography. RESULTS: The ACE gene polymorphism distribution was similar in patients and control subjects. However, ACE gene DD polymorphism was associated with a more severe condition, greater LVDD [mm: DD: 71+/-7, ID: 62+/-5, II: 60+/-5, P<0.001 DD vs. ID, P<0.001 DD vs. II] and higher plasma Ang II level [pg/ml DD: 92+/-19, ID: 79+/-21, II: 65+/-17 P<0.05 DD vs. ID, P<0.001 DD vs. II]. CONCLUSION: In Chinese Han patients with CHF, ACE gene DD polymorphism might be a marker of a more severe condition, and a higher level of activation of the renin-angiotensin system.     

Angiotensin I-converting enzyme insertion/deletion polymorphism and cardiac mortality and morbidity after coronary artery bypass graft surgery

STUDY OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to evaluate whether the insertion (I)/deletion (D) polymorphism of the angiotensin I-converting enzyme (ACE) gene is associated with mortality and cardiac morbidity after coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG). METHODS AND RESULTS: The ACE I/D genotype was determined in 249 consecutive patients who underwent CABG. Follow-up information (after 2 years) was obtained in 247 patients (99.2%). The primary end point was total mortality; the secondary end point was mortality from cardiac reasons, or the need for myocardial revascularization (coronary angioplasty or recurrent CABG) during follow-up. At follow-up, total mortality was 9.7% (all patients). None of the 51 patients with the ACE II genotype, 14 of 125 patients with the ACE ID genotype (11.2%), and 10 of 71 with the ACE DD genotype (14.1%) died during follow-up (p < 0.05). The ACE DD genotype, older age, diabetes mellitus, decreased left ventricular ejection fraction, and lack of internal mammary artery graft were independently related to an increased mortality after CABG. The incidence of the secondary end point was 14.5% (all patients): ACE II, 5.8%; ACE ID, 9.4%; ACE DD, 30.3% (p < 0.05). The ACE DD genotype and the presence of a left main coronary artery stenosis >or= 50% were independent predictors for the secondary end point. CONCLUSION: The ACE DD genotype is associated with increased midterm mortality and cardiac morbidity after CABG.     

The DD genotype of angiotensin converting enzyme polymorphism is a risk factor for coronary artery disease and coronary stent restenosis in Japanese patients

Stent implantation has decreased the incidence of restenosis after coronary intervention, but has not eliminated it. The contribution of the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) genotype to the development of coronary artery disease and restenosis after coronary stenting was investigated in 67 Japanese patients in whom 103 lesions in which stents had been successfully implanted were assessed by quantitative coronary angiography, before, immediately after coronary stenting, and during follow-up. The distribution of the patients with the DD, ID, and II genotypes was 13%, 54%, and 33%, respectively. The prevalence of multivessel disease in the DD genotype was significantly higher (DD genotype: 78%; ID genotype: 58%; II genotype: 27%, chi2=8.13, p=0.016) and the late loss in the DD genotype (1.43+/-0.96 mm) was significantly greater (ID genotype: 0.78+/-0.98 mm and II genotype: 0.79+/-0.88 mm, p<0.05 vs DD genotype). However, there was no significant difference in the restenosis rate among the 3 genotypes. The present study in Japanese patients indicates that the DD genotype is associated with more extensive coronary artery disease and progression of the inward remodeling within the stented lesion, which is primarily caused by neointimal hyperplasia.     

高血压人群中ACE、ADRB1基因多态性与冠状动脉狭窄程度的相关性研究

目的探讨高血压人群中血管紧张素转换酶(ACE)基因多态性及β1肾上腺素能受体(ADRB1)基因多态性与冠状动脉(冠脉)狭窄程度的相关性。方法选取2017年7月至2019年4月于徐州医科大学附属医院心血管内科住院的280例高血压患者的临床资料进行回顾性分析,行冠脉造影或冠脉CT血管造影(CTA)检查判定其是否患有冠心病(CHD),并依据结果判定其冠脉病变支数及给予Gensini评分。根据冠脉检查结果将上述患者分为CHD组(n=145)和对照组(n=135)。所有入选病例均给予了ACE及ADRB1基因多态性检测,并根据结果分为ACE II型纯合子、ID型杂合子、DD型纯合子和ADRB1 GG型纯合子、GC型杂合子、CC型纯合子。结果在研究的高血压人群中,ACE DD基因型携带者在冠脉病变支数中的多支病变组及Gensini得分分组中的重度病变组的占比明显高于ACE II及ACE ID基因型(P<0.05);ADRB1基因多态性在冠脉病变支数分组及Gensini得分分组的对比中无明显相关性(P>0.05);CHD组与对照组一般临床资料对比中显示年龄、高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(HDL-C)和糖尿病与CHD存在相关性,且有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论ACE基因多态性与高血压人群冠状动脉狭窄程度密切相关,ADRB1基因多态性无明显相关性。     

Influence of stent design and deployment technique on neointima formation and vascular remodeling

A variety of different stent types is available for the treatment of coronary stenosis. However, in-stent restenosis remains the major limitation for the use of these devices. Intracoronary ultrasound (ICUS) in addition to coronary angiography provides precise measurements of coronary wall dimensions during stent implantation and of intimal hyperplasia during follow-up. The extent of coronary injury during stent implantation was shown to play an important role in neointima formation. It is characterized by endothelial exposure, intima laceration, and media permeation. Stent-induced coronary injury has been considered to depend on stent design and stent strut size with consecutive deep wall laceration. ICUS analysis showed a correlation between the stent design and the amount of neointimal tissue proliferation. The role of adventitial remodeling in the process of restenosis is discussed controversially. Post-procedural stent expansion may provoke adventitial remodeling. The stent design and stenting strategy determines the extent of peri- and post-procedural coronary injury. Post-procedural coronary morphologic changes and changes of the stent geometry depend upon the stent design. Beside further modifications as the use of drug-eluting stents the decrease of stent-related vessel injury should be an important criterion for the development of future stent design.     

冠心病患者血管紧张素转换酶基因多态性及其与血清血管紧张素转换酶水平的关系

为研究冠心病患者血管紧张素转换酶（ＡＣＥ），基因插入／缺失（Ｉ／Ｄ）多态性分布及其血清ＡＣＥ水平的相关性，应用多聚酶链反应方法测定了６１例冠心病患者和６３例健康人群的ＡＣＥ水平，结果发现，冠心病患者ＡＣＥ基因ＤＤ型出现频率显著对照组，且ＤＤ基因型者具有较高的血清ＡＣＥ水平，提示，ＡＣＥ基因Ｉ／Ｄ多态性与血清ＡＣＥ水平密切相关，ＤＤ型ＡＣＥ基因可能是中国人冠心病发病的独立危险因子。     

Effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition on restenosis after coronary stenting

The Plasma level of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) has been identified as a major risk factor for restenosis after coronary stent implantation in selected patients; ACE inhibition may therefore contribute to prevent its occurrence. The effect of oral ACE inhibition at conventional doses was analyzed retrospectively in a series of 897 patients with ischemia who received >or=1 coronary stent on 998 lesions and underwent angiographic follow-up; no exclusion criteria were introduced in this analysis. The restenosis rate in 282 patients (31.4%) taking ACE inhibitors was 36.6% compared with 22.9% in 615 non-ACE-inhibited patients (p = 0.00001, odds ratio [OR] 1.94, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.45 to 2.59), and the late loss in minimum lumen diameter was 1.25 +/- 0.8 versus 0.96 +/- 0.8 mm, respectively (p = 0.0001). During univariate analysis, a negative effect of the drug on restenosis was observed in all subgroups of patients (i.e., hypertensives, diabetics, women, and patients with previous myocardial infarction). Similar effects were observed independently of the ACE gene insertion/deletion polymorphism. During multivariate analysis, ACE inhibition was confirmed as an independent risk factor for restenosis (OR 1.84, 95% CI 1.35 to 2.51, p = 0.0001). Other predictors were the implantation of multiple stents (OR 2.41, 95% CI 1.60 to 3.64, p <0.0001), diabetes (OR 2.34, 95% CI 1.61 to 3.41, p <0.0001), and vessel reference diameter before angioplasty (OR 0.51, 95% CI 0.38 to 0.69, p <0.0001). Although unexplained and apparently contradictory, our data suggest that the use of conventional oral doses of ACE inhibitors in a "real-world" population who underwent coronary stent implantation increases the incidence of in-stent restenosis. Such a finding does not negate the known clinical benefits of ACE inhibitors, but it may deserve attention when a patient treated with ACE inhibitors becomes a candidate for stent implantation.     

Pharmacogenetic analysis of the effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor on restenosis after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty.

Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors are reported to prevent neointimal formation after balloon injury in animal models, but in most prospective studies in humans, ACE inhibitors failed to prevent restenosis after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA). The ACE genotype assigned by an insertion/deletion (I/D) polymorphism is known to affect the potency of ACE inhibitors in several renal diseases. The authors attempted to clarify whether the effect of ACE inhibitors on restenosis might be modified by the ACE genotype. A total of 126 patients was randomly and prospectively assigned to the control group and the imidapril group. In the imidapril group, patients received 5 mg imidapril daily, starting 1 day before PTCA and continuing for 3 to 6 months. Forty-six control (65 vessels) and 32 imidapril patients (43 vessels) completed the study. The minimal lumen diameter before and after the procedure did not differ significantly among the groups with the three genotypes (II, ID, and DD) in both the control and imidapril groups. Late luminal loss during the follow-up period was not related to the ACE genotype in the control group but was significantly related in the imidapril group (II, 0.63+/- 0.19 mm; ID + DD, 1.12+/-0.14 mm, p<0.05). Furthermore, in the II genotype, imidapril significantly reduced late loss and restenosis rate as defined by most of the frequently used definitions. In conclusion the ACE I/D polymorphism may influence the effect of ACE inhibitors in preventing restenosis after PTCA.