Fried, well-done red meat and riskof lung cancer in women (United States)

Objective: Some epidemiological studies suggest that diets high in fat, saturated fat, or cholesterol are associated with increased risk of lung cancer. Since meat consumption is correlated with the intake of saturated fat and cholesterol, we investigated the role of meat intake and cooking practices in relation to lung cancer risk.Methods: A population-based case-control study of both non-smoking and smoking women was conducted in Missouri. A 100-item food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) with detailed questions on meat consumption was completed by 593 cases and 623 frequency matched controls. We estimated quantity of meat eaten (grams/day) according to cooking method, and doneness level. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (C.I.s) were calculated using logistic regression. Multivariate models included age, packyears of smoking, body mass index (BMI, kg/m2), education, and intake of calories, fat, fruit/fruit juices, and vegetables.Results: When comparing 90th and 10th percentiles, lung cancer risk increased for total meat consumption (OR=1.6, C.I. 1.1-2.4), red meat (OR=1.8, C.I., 1.2-2.7), well-done red meat (OR=1.5, C.I.s, 1.1-2.1) and fried red meat (OR=1.5, C.I., 1.1-2.0). The odds ratios for 5th vs. 1st quintiles using the categorical variable for well-done red meat and fried red meat were essentially the same as reported above; however, the increase in risk was associated mainly with the 5th quintile. The ORs for a 10-gram increase in consumption were, 1.04 for total meat, 1.06 for red meat, 1.08 for well done red meat, and 1.09 for fried red meat.Conclusions: Consumption of red meat, especially fried and/or well-done red meat, was associated with increased risk of lung cancer.     

Diet and adenocarcinoma of the lung: a case-control study in Uruguay.

With the objective of examining the relationship between diet and adenocarcinoma of the lung, a case-control study was carried out in Uruguay. Red meat, total meat and fatty foods were associated with a significant increase in risk (odds ratios (OR) for red meat intake 1.92, 95% CI 1.27-2.90). On the other hand, fruits, tubers and all plant foods displayed significant inverse associations with adenocarcinoma of the lung (OR for total plant foods 0.39, 95% CI 0.26-0.61). Among nutrients, total fat, other fats (saturated fat) and cholesterol were associated with an increased risk of adenocarcinoma of the lung (OR for high consumption of total fat 2.28, 95% CI 1.48-3.54). The risk associated with cholesterol intake was even higher after controlling for total fat, suggesting that both nutrients (fat and cholesterol) have independent effects. Carotenoids and vitamin E displayed significantly protective effects. This effect was markedly attenuated, when these micronutrients were adjusted for total plant intake. Furthermore, red meat, fat, and cholesterol showed attenuation in its effects after adjustment for total plant foods. It could be concluded that tobacco smoking is the strongest risk factor for adenocarcinoma of the lung. Low consumption of plant foods, and in a lesser degree, high consumption of red meat, total fat and cholesterol contribute to a high risk of adenocarcinoma of the lung.     

Dietary fat and lung cancer: a case-control study in Uruguay

To examine whether dietary fat and cholesterol modifies lung cancer risk, a case-control study was conducted in Uruguay of 426 men diagnosed from1993 to 1996 with lung cancer, and 419 hospitalized frequency-matched controls. Dietary patterns were assessed using a 64-item food frequency questionnaire, which allowed the calculation of total energy intake. After adjustment for potential confounders through a model which included tobacco smoking, total energy, a term for all vegetables and fruits, and a-carotene in take, an increase in risk for total fat intake for all cell types of lung cancer was observed. Adenocarcinoma of the lung was associated strongly with saturated fat intake (odds ratio [OR] = 2.3, 95 percent confidence interval[CI] = 1.2-4.4), whereas small-cell lung cancer was associated with dietary cholesterol (OR = 2.8, CI = 1.1-7.5). These results suggest that the association of saturated fat and cholesterol could be type-specific, but the high correlation existing between dietary lipids precludes any strong statement about this point. This revised version was published online in July 2006 with corrections to the Cover Date.     

Risk factors for oral and pharyngeal cancer in never smokers

Information on the etiology of oral and pharyngeal cancer in never smokers should help us to understand and quantify risk factors for the disease in the absence of the residual confounding and interaction by smoking. Out of a total of 528 cases with histologically confirmed incident cancers of the oral cavity and pharynx, 42 (10 men and 32 women) who described themselves as lifelong non-smokers were considered. Controls were 864 lifelong non-smokers (442 men and 422 women) admitted to hospital for acute, non-neoplastic, non-alcohol-related conditions. The major risk factor for cancer of the oral cavity and pharynx in never smokers was alcohol consumption (mainly wine) with an odds ratio (OR) about three-fold higher in drinkers than non-drinkers. A direct relation was also found for the duration of the habit, with an OR of 3.6 (95% confidence intervals, CI, 1.2-11.2) for drinking for 35 years or longer. Among the few selected indicator foods considered, a direct association was found with butter (OR 2.7, 95% CI 1.4-5.1 for high intake compared to low), and a non-significant inverse association with carrots (OR 0.6, 95% CI 0.3-1.3) and fresh fruit (OR 0.7, 95% CI 0.3-1.6) for the highest tertile of intake compared to the lowest. Thus, even in the absence of smoking, reducing alcohol and saturated fat intake and increasing fruit and carrot consumption may have favorable effects on oral and pharyngeal cancer risk.     

Macronutrients, fatty acids and cholesterol intake and endometrial cancer.

BACKGROUND: There is some evidence that dietary habits may influence the risk of endometrial cancer independently of body mass, although the role of diet on endometrial carcinogenesis is unclear. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We carried out a multicenter case-control study from 1992 to 2006 in Italy on 454 women with incident, histologically confirmed endometrial cancer (age range 18-79 years) and 908 controls (age range 19-79 years) admitted to hospitals for acute, non-neoplastic diseases. A validated food-frequency questionnaire was used to estimate macronutrients, fatty acids and cholesterol intake. Logistic regression models, conditioned on age and study centre, and adjusted for major known risk factor of endometrial cancer and residual of energy intake were used to estimate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: Significant direct associations were observed with intake of energy (OR = 1.7 for the highest versus the lowest quintile, 95% CI = 1.1-2.5), and cholesterol (OR = 2.1, 95% CI = 1.4-3.2), while a direct borderline association emerged with saturated fatty acids (OR = 1.3, 95% CI = 0.9-2.0). There was no association with proteins, sugars, starch, total fat and other selected fatty acids. CONCLUSION: Energy and cholesterol intake were associated with endometrial cancer.     

Dietary factors and risk of colon cancer in Shanghai, China.

Colon cancer incidence rates have risen sharply in Shanghai, China, since the early 1970s, and diet may have contributed to the rising incidence. To clarify the role of dietary factors for colon cancer in Shanghai, we analyzed data from a population-based case-control study of 931 cases (462 males and 469 females) and 1552 controls (851 males and 701 females) ages 30-74 years in Shanghai, China, from 1990-1993. Subjects were interviewed in person for a detailed history of dietary practices and food preferences by using a food-frequency questionnaire. Colon cancer risk was estimated by odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), adjusting for age, total energy, and other confounding factors. Risk for the highest versus the lowest quartile of intake was elevated for red meat (OR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.0-2.1 for men and OR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.0-2.2 for women), fish (OR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.2-2.4 for men and OR, 1.2; 95% CI, 0.8-1.7 for women), and eggs (OR, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.0-1.9 for men and OR, 1.3; 95% CI, 0.9-1.9 for women), but was reduced for fresh fruit (OR, 0.7; 95% CI, 0.5-1.0 for men and OR, 0.6, 0.4-0.9 for women). High intake of preserved foods, whether animal or plant source, was associated with an excess risk of colon cancer (OR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.5-2.9 for men and OR, 2.7; 95% CI, 1.9-3.8 for women). For dietary nutrients, risk generally declined with greater consumption of fiber and micronutrients common in fruit and vegetables, including vitamin C, carotene, and vitamin E. Intake of macronutrients in general was not significantly related to risk. Our findings suggest that diets high in fruit and antioxidant vitamins that are common in plant foods reduce the risk of colon cancer, whereas diets high in red meat, eggs, and preserved foods increase the risk.     

Dietary fat, cholesterol and colorectal cancer in a prospective study

The relationships between consumption of total fat, major dietary fatty acids, cholesterol, consumption of meat and eggs, and the incidence of colorectal cancers were studied in a cohort based on the Finnish Mobile Clinic Health Examination Survey. Baseline (1967-1972) information on habitual food consumption over the preceding year was collected from 9959 men and women free of diagnosed cancer. A total of 109 new colorectal cancer cases were ascertained late 1999. High cholesterol intake was associated with increased risk for colorectal cancers. The relative risk between the highest and lowest quartiles of dietary cholesterol was 3.26 (95% confidence interval 1.54-6.88) after adjusting for age, sex, body mass index, occupation, smoking, geographic region, energy intake and consumption of vegetables, fruits and cereals. Consumption of total fat and intake of saturated, monounsaturated, or polyunsaturated fatty acids were not significantly associated with colorectal cancer risk. Nonsignificant associations were found between consumption of meat and eggs and colorectal cancer risk. The results of the present study indicate that high cholesterol intake may increase colorectal cancer risk, but do not suggest the presence of significant effects of dietary fat intake on colorectal cancer incidence.     

Meat, fat and risk of laryngeal cancer: a case-control study in Uruguay

The effect of meat and fat in laryngeal carcinogenesis was examined in a case-control study carried out in Uruguay in the time period 1998-1999. One-hundred and forty patients with squamous cell laryngeal carcinoma and 420 hospitalized patients, afflicted with conditions not related with tobacco smoking, alcohol drinking or recent dietary changes comprised the cases and controls in this study. All patients were interviewed face-to-face in the hospitals with a detailed questionnaire which included queries on 64 food items. Red and total meat intakes were associated with strong increases in risk of laryngeal cancer (odds ratio [OR] for high total meat intake 3.32, 95% confidence interval [C.I.] 1.23-8.95). This effect disappeared after controlling for total fat intake. On the other hand, total fat intake displayed a strong association with risk of laryngeal cancer when red meat was included in the same model (OR for high fat intake 7.05, 95% C.I. 2.51-19.8). Total fat intake combines its effect multiplicatively with tobacco smoking.     

Dietary fats and lung cancer risk among women: the Missouri Women's Health Study (United States)

In a population-based case-control study of women in Missouri (United States), most of whom were smokers, we obtained information on adult diet to evaluate the effects of dietary fats in relation to lung cancer risk. All newly diagnosed, primary lung cancer cases among women 35 to 84 years of age reported to the Missouri Cancer Registry from 1 January 1993 to 31 January1994 were invited to participate, as were population-based controls. The analysis focused on interviews obtained from 624 controls and 587 cases. In-person interviews were obtained from 99.0 percent of controls and 60.6percent of cases. Age and energy-adjusted relative risks suggested a direct relation between risk of lung cancer and intake of dietary fats (e.g., total fat, saturated fat) and frequency of meat consumption. After adjusting for confounders, dietary fats were no longer associated with risk, but the adverse effect of frequent consumption of meat persisted. Risk was elevated about 90 percent (95 per cent confidence interval = 1.2-3.0) among women in the highest quintile of red meat intake compared with those in the lowest quintile. Risk estimates associated with red meat consumption, however, were dependent on interview status; the effect was restricted to cases whose dietary information was provided by proxy. In summary, after adjusting for potential confounders and removing data obtained from proxy respondents, dietary fats and consumption of red meat were not associated with lung cancer risk among women in Missouri. This revised version was published online in July 2006 with corrections to the Cover Date.     

Case-Control Study of Diet and Prostate Cancer in a Rural Population of Faisalabad,Pakistan

Background: The effects of diet on epidemiology of prostate cancer are inconclusive. Therefore a hospitalbased,case-control study was conducted in a rural population of Faisalabad, Pakistan, to examine the impact ofdietary factors on risk of cancer development. Materials and Methods: This study was based on 102 confirmedcases of prostate cancer and 204 normal controls. Logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios and 95%confidence intervals for odds ratios to evaluate the relationship between prostate cancer and diet. Results:Consumption of red meat and fat items significantly increased the prostate cancer risk having odds ratios and 95%confidence intervals of 3.41; 1.46-7.96 and 2.45; 1.17-5.15, respectively. On the other hand, more consumption ofvegetables, fluid intake and fruit significantly decreased the prostate cancer risk (odd ratios and corresponding95% confidence intervals of 0.21; 0.10-0.44, 0.10; 0.05- 0.19 and 0.09; 0.03- 0.23, respectively. Conclusions: Thepresent study supports the hypothesis that frequent consumption of red meat and fat items may increase prostatecancer risk while more intake of fruit, vegetables and fluid intake may protect against prostate cancer in therelatively low risk group in rural Pakistan.     

The role of fat, animal protein and some vitamin consumption in breast cancer: a case control study in southern France

The role of the consumption of fat, animal protein and vitamins on breast-cancer risk was investigated in a hospital-based case-control study of 924 patients (409 cases and 515 controls) in Montpellier (France). A dietary history questionnaire, administered by interview, comprising 55 key food items as well as beverage consumption, and including food frequencies and portion sizes, was used to measure the intake of total fat and its constituents, animal protein, retinol, beta-carotene, vitamin E and alcohol consumption. The questionnaire also elicited information on relevant medical history and personal characteristics. All food items which showed significantly elevated odds ratio (high-fat cheese, desserts and chocolate and processed pork meat) in a multivariate analysis contained a high proportion of animal fat. This is reflected in the nutrient analysis, which showed a significant linear trend as well as an elevated odds ratio for the highest tertile of consumption of total fat [OR3 = 1.6 (1.1-2.2)], animal fat [OR3 = 1.6 (1.1-2.2)], saturated fat [OR3 = 1.9 (1.3-2.6)] and mono-unsaturated fat [OR3 = 1.7 (1.2-2.5)]. For post-menopausal women, there is a particularly strong association with saturated fat [OR3 = 3.3 (1.4-7.8)] in a multivariate analysis including all other significant nutrients. There is no evidence of an increase of risk with the intake of animal protein and no evidence of risk reduction with increased consumption of vegetables, beta-carotene or vitamin E. Along with some recent studies, our results give support to the hypothesis that dietary fat is a risk factor in breast carcinogenesis.     

Meat Consumption,Related Nutrients,Obesity and Risk of Prostate Cancer: a Case-Control Study in Uruguay

Background: In order to determine the role of meat consumption and related nutrients in the etiology of prostate cancer we conducted a case-control study among Uruguayan men in the time period 1998-2007. Results: The study included 464 cases and 472 controls, frequency matched for age and residence. Both series were drawn from the four major public hospitals in Montevideo. Unconditional logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95 % confidence intervals (95 % CI) of prostate cancer by quartiles of meat intake and related nutrients. The highest vs. the lowest quartile of intake of total meat (OR = 5.19, 95 % CI 3.46-7.81), red meat (OR = 4.64, 95 % CI 3.10-6.95), and processed meat (OR = 1.78, 95% CI 1.22-2.59) were associated with increased risk of prostate cancer. Meat nutrients were directly associated with the risk of prostate cancer (OR for cholesterol 5.61, 95 % CI 3.75-8.50). Moreover, both total meat and red meat displayed higher risks among obese patients. Conclusions: This study suggests that total and red meat and meat nutrients may play a role in the etiology of prostate cancer in Uruguay.     

Meat, fish and fat intake in relation to subsite-specific risk of colorectal cancer: The Fukuoka Colorectal Cancer Study

High intake of red meat has been associated with increased risk of colorectal cancer in Western countries. There has been much interest in the role of n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) in colorectal cancer prevention, but epidemiological findings are limited and inconsistent. The objective of our study was to examine associations of meat, fish and fat intake with risk of colorectal cancer, paying particular attention to the subsite within the colorectum. Data were from the Fukuoka Colorectal Cancer Study, a population-based case-control study, covering 782 cases and 793 controls. Diet was assessed by interview, using newly developed personal-computer software for registering semiquantitative food frequencies. The intake of beef/pork, processed meat, total fat, saturated fat or n-6 PUFA showed no clear association with the overall or subsite-specific risk of colorectal cancer. There was an almost significant inverse association between n-3 PUFA and the risk of colorectal cancer; the covariate-adjusted odds ratio for the highest (median 3.94 g/day) versus lowest (median 1.99 g/day) quintile of energy-adjusted intake was 0.74 (95% confidence interval 0.52-1.06, trend P=0.050). The consumption of fish and fish products was similarly inversely related to the risk although the association was not statistically significant. These associations were more evident for distal colon cancer; adjusted odds ratio for the highest versus lowest quintile of n-3 PUFA intake was 0.56 (95% confidence interval 0.34-0.92, trend P=0.02). Our findings do not support the hypothesis that consumption of red meat increases colorectal cancer risk but do suggest that high intake of fish may decrease the risk, particularly of distal colon cancer.     

Risk Factors of Prostate Cancer: a Case-control Study in Faisalabad,Pakistan

Background: Prostate cancer is the third most commonly diagnosed cancer among males in Pakistan but verylittle is known about risk factors among the Pakistani population. Therefore a hospital-based, case-control studywas carried out in Faisalabad to identify potential risk factors. Materials and Methods: This study was basedon 140 prostate cancer cases and 280 normal controls. Logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios and95% confidence intervals for odds ratios to assess the relationship between prostate cancer and different riskfactors. Results: Family history of prostate cancer, age, smoking, obesity, consumption of red meat and frequentuse of fat items significantly increased the prostate cancer risk (odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals of:7.32; 1.79-29.8; 16.9, 5.60-50.8; 2.47, 1.17-5.18; 5.79, 2.66-12.6; 2.71, 1.07-6.91; and 3.39, 1.47-7.83, respectively.On the other hand, more consumption of fruit, fluid intake and better lifestyle (physical activity) significantlyreduced the risk of developing prostate cancer with odd ratios and corresponding 95% confidence intervals of:0.27, 0.11-0.61; 0.05, 0.02-0.12; and 0.28, 0.13- 0.58. Conclusions: The results of the present study suggested thatage, family history of prostate cancer, smoking, obesity, fluid intake, frequent use of fat items, consumption offruits and better lifestyle might be associated with prostate cancer among Pakistani males.     

Meat Consumption,Meat Cooking and Risk of Lung Cancer Among Uruguayan Men

A case-control study was conducted in Uruguay, including 876 male cases of lung cancer and 876 malehospitalized controls, frequency matched for age (ten-year intervals), residence and hospital. The followingexplanatory variables were included in the study: fried red meat, barbecued red meat, boiled red meat, andsalted red meat. These items were log transformed and energy-adjusted by the residuals method. The followingpotential confounders were included into the models: age, residence, hospital, education, family history of lungcancer, body mass index, smoking index, alcohol drinking, mate consumption, total energy intake, non-meatfatty foods and total fruits. The main objective was to estimate the odds ratios associated with lung cancer risk.Whereas fried meat, barbecued meat, and salted meat were positively associated with risk (OR of the highestquartile of salted meat versus the lowest, 2.90, 95 % CI 1.99-4.25, p-value for trend <0.0001), boiled red meatwas mainly protective. We conclude that salted meat was the main risk factor. The mechanisms could be relatedto the content of N-nitroso compounds in salted meat.     

Fruits,Vegetables and the Risk of Cancer: a Multisite Case-Control Study in Uruguay

Introduction: Previous studies have suggested that high intake of fruit and vegetables may decrease the riskof a wide range of cancers, but this evidence has been challenged by the results of recent studies. Methods: Tofurther explore the association between fruit and vegetable intake and cancer risk we conducted a case-controlstudy of 11 cancer sites in Uruguay between 1996 and 2004, including 3,539 cancer cases and 2,032 hospitalcontrols. We used unconditional logistic regression to estimate odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CIs)of cancer associations. Results: In the multivariable model higher intake of fruits and vegetables combined wasassociated with a decreased risk of cancers of the esophagus (odds ratio, OR=0.63, 95% CI: 0.42-0.97), lung(OR=0.75, 95% CI: 0.57-0.98), breast (OR=0.47, 95% CI: 0.31-0.71), prostate (OR=0.63, 95% CI: 0.44-0.92)and all sites combined (OR=0.73, 95% CI: 0.61-0.87). When evaluated separately, fruit intake was more stronglyassociated with decreased cancer risk than vegetables. These inverse associations were mainly observed in men,among persons with high intake of meat, alcohol drinkers and among smokers. Conclusion: Our results providesome evidence that high intake of fruits and vegetables and particularly fruit may decrease the risk of cancer.However, because of the possibility that these findings could be due to residual confounding from intake ofmeat, alcohol drinking and tobacco smoking, further studies in populations with a large number of participantswith low or no exposure to these potential confounding factors are warranted.     

Fat, fiber, fruits, vegetables, and risk of colorectal adenomas

A case-control study was conducted at the National Naval Medical Center (Maryland, USA) from 1994 to 1996 to investigate the possible association between dietary factors and colorectal adenomas. Cases (n = 239) were subjects diagnosed with adenomas (146 new and 93 recurrent) by sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy. Those with no evidence of adenomas found by sigmoidoscopy were recruited as controls (n = 228). Dietary variables, assessed by a 100-item food frequency questionnaire, were analyzed by the logistic regression model, which was adjusted for age, gender and total energy intake. Variables of fat intake were further adjusted for red meat intake. An increased risk of 7% [odds ratio (OR): 1.07; 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 0.94-1.22] per 5% energy/day from total fat was observed. Every additional 5% unit of oleic acid intake/day significantly increased the adenoma risk by 115% (OR: 2.15; 95% CI: 1.05-4.39). Red meat fat increased the risk by 20% (OR: 1.20; 95% CI: 0.71-2.04), and white meat fat decreased the risk by 67% (OR: 0.33; 95% CI: 0.19-0.95) for every additional 5% unit of respective intake/day. Risk decreased by 41% (OR: 0.59; 95% CI: 0.41-0.86) for every additional 5% unit of fiber intake/day. Vegetable [OR per 100 g of vegetable intake/day: 0.83, 95% CI: 0.67-1.04] and fruit (OR per 100 g of fruit intake/day: 0.92, 95% CI: 0.82-1.03) intake showed an inverse association, and the results are suggestive of an association with the risk for adenomas. In conclusion, a strong positive association between oleic acid intake and colorectal adenoma risk was observed. This is likely to be an indicator of "unhealthy" food (meat, dairy, margarine, mayonnaise, sweet baked food) consumption in this population. Increased intake of dietary fiber was associated with a moderately decreased risk of adenomas.     

Meat Consumption and Cancer Risk: a Case-control Study in Uruguay

Introduction: There is strong evidence that high meat intake increases the risk of colorectal cancer. However,for other cancer sites there is currently less convincing evidence. Methods: To further explore associations betweenmeat intake and cancer risk we conducted a multisite case-control study of 11 cancer sites in Uruguay between1996 and 2004, including 3,539 cancer cases and 2,032 hospital controls. We used unconditional logistic regressionto estimate odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals of cancer associated with meat intake. Results: In themultivariable model there was a significant increase in the odds of cancers of the oral cavity and pharynx(OR=3.65, 95% CI: 2.21-6.01), esophagus (OR=3.36, 95% CI: 1.97-5.72), larynx (OR=2.91, 95% CI: 1.80-4.68),stomach (OR=2.19, 95% CI: 1.31-3.65), colorectum (OR=3.83, 95% CI: 2.37-6.20), lung (OR=2.17, 95% CI:1.52-3.10), breast (OR=1.97, 95% CI: 1.04-3.75), prostate (OR=1.87, 95% CI: 1.08-3.21), bladder (OR=2.11,95% CI: 1.20-3.72) and kidney (OR=2.72, 95% CI: 1.22-6.07) with high intake of red meat and similar findingswere found for total meat. In addition, intake of beef and lamb were also associated with increased risk ofseveral cancer sites. High intake of processed meat was associated with increased risk of cancers of the esophagus(OR=1.63, 95% CI: 1.08-2.47), larynx (OR=1.84, 95% CI: 1.21-2.78), stomach (OR=1.62, 95% CI: 1.07-2.44),colorectum (OR=2.15, 95% CI: 1.49-3.11), lung (OR=1.70, 95% CI: 1.28-2.25) and breast (OR=1.53, 95% CI:1.01-2.30). Conclusion: Our results confirm earlier findings of increased risk of digestive tract cancers, butsuggest that meat consumption also increases the risk of several other cancers.     

Fruit consumption reduces the effect of smoking on bladder cancer risk. The Belgian case control study on bladder cancer

We have hypothesized that consumption of fruit and vegetables may be associated with reduced risk of bladder cancer and that this may interact with cigarette smoking and metabolic genetic polymorphisms. A population-based case-control study was performed in the Belgian province of Limburg among 200 cases and 385 controls. Logistic regression was performed to calculate odds ratios (ORs) for bladder cancer occurrence with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). Effect modification by smoking was investigated. We also evaluated interaction between fruit intake and GSTM1, GSTT1, NAT2 and SULT1A1 amongst "ever-smokers." Total vegetable intake was not significantly associated with the risk of bladder cancer (OR 1.15, 95% CI: 0.70-1.88 for the highest compared to the lowest tertile). However, total fruit intake was negatively associated with bladder cancer risk (OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.37-0.99 comparing the same tertiles). Among individuals with low daily fruit consumption, ever smokers had a highly increased risk of bladder cancer risk (OR: 4.23, 95% CI: 1.91-9.40). By increasing the daily fruit consumption, the risk of "ever-smokers" for developing bladder cancer decreased, however it remained significant (OR: 2.15; 95CI%: 1.15-4.05). No interaction was identified between the different genotypes and fruit consumption. We conclude that fruit consumption may decrease the effect of smoking on developing bladder cancer. Antioxidants, found in fruit, may protect against the damage caused by free radicals found in cigarette smoke. Metabolic polymorphisms appear not to modify this relation.     

Meat,fat and risk of breast cancer: A case-control study from Uruguay

To examine whether meat intake modifies breast-cancer risk, a case-control study was conducted in Uruguay. Dietary patterns were assessed in detail (for cases, before diagnosis or symptoms occurred) using a food frequency questionnaire involving 64 food items, which allowed total energy intake to be calculated. Nutrient residuals were calculated through regression analysis. After adjustment for potential confounders (which included family history of breast cancer, menopausal status, body-mass index, total energy and total alcohol intake), an increased risk associated with consumption of total meat intake, red meat intake, total fat and saturated fat intake was observed. The strongest effect was observed for red meat intake (OR 4.2, 95% CL 2.3–7.7) for consumption in the upper quartile, after controlling for protein and fat intake. This suggests an independent effect for meat. Since experimental studies have shown a strong effect of heterocyclic amines in rat mammary carcinogenesis, further studies should be performed in human epidemiology, perhaps using biomarkers of heterocyclic amine exposure. © 1996 Wiley-Liss, Inc.