Effects of d-amphetamine and ethanol alone and in combination on schedule-controlled responding of pigeons

Key pecking by pigeons was maintained under either a 5-min fixed-interval or a 30-response fixed-ratio schedule of food delivery. d-Amphetamine (0.1–1.0 mg/kg) either increased or did not affect overall rates of responding under the fixed-interval schedule; the lowest dose of ethanol (0.5 g/kg) did not affect or slightly decreased response rates, whereas higher doses (1.0–2.0 g/kg) substantially decreased rates. Combinations of low noneffective ethanol doses with most doses of d-amphetamine increased rates of responding under the fixed-interval schedule above those obtained with d-amphetamine alone; decreases produced by the higher doses of ethanol were attenuated by most doses of d-amphetamine. Doses of d-amphetamine (0.1–1.0 mg/kg) and ethanol (0.5–1.5 g/kg) alone generally had no effect on responding maintained under the fixed-ratio schedule; higher doses of these drugs decreased responding. The effects of dose combinations other than the highest ones generally differed little from those obtained with ethanol alone; the effects of high doses of each drug were antagonized by low to moderate doses of the other. Combinations of ethanol with d-amphetamine can result in higher rates of responding than are obtained with either drug alone. Further, effects of the drugs alone and in combination depend on the schedule under which behavior is maintained.     

Effects of d-amphetamine and naloxone on brain stimulation reward

Self-stimulation thresholds were determined in rats by means of a modification of the psychophysical method of limits. Reinforcement values were determined after the administration of d-amphetamine alone, naloxone alone, and naloxone administered concurrently with d-amphetamine. d-Amphetamine yielded dose-related decreases in the threshold (0.25–2.00 mg/kg IP), while naloxone alone (2.0–16 mg/kg IP) caused no consistent changes. For each animal, a dose of d-amphetamine that substantially lowered the threshold was then selected to be administered with varying doses of naloxone. The threshold-lowering effect of d-amphetamine was blocked by naloxone at doses as low as 2.0 or 4.0 mg/kg. This finding suggests the possible involvement of an opiate receptor in the mediation of the enhancement by d-amphetamine of brain stimulation reward.     

Effects of morphine alone and in combination with naloxone or d-amphetamine on shock-maintained behavior in the squirrel monkey

Key-pressing behavior in the squirrel monkey was maintained under an 8-min fixed-interval (FI) schedule of electric-shock delivery. The acute i.m. administration of morphine prior to a daily session decreased response rates at doses of 1.0–3.0 mg/kg but had little systematic effect on rate at doses of 0.03–0.3 mg/kg. When naloxone was administered concomitantly with morphine prior to a session, 0.01 mg/kg naloxone required a three-fold increase in the dose of morphine necessary to obtain decreased response rates, 0.1 mg/kg naloxone required a 30-fold increase in morphine, and 1.0 mg/kg required more than a 30-fold increase in morphine. Moreover, the administration of naloxone with morphine resulted in increased rates of responding at certain combinations of doses of the two drugs. The administration of d-amphetamine (0.03 or 0.1 mg/kg) alone increased mean response rates under the FI schedule; when combined with 0.03–0.3 mg/kg morphine the increases in responding were greater than obtained with d-amphetamine alone. The negative slope of the linear regression lines relating the effects of morphine to control rates of responding engendered under the FI schedule was decreased when morphine was combined with naloxone, but not with d-amphetamine. These results show that naloxone, but not d-amphetamine, can antagonize the response-rate decreasing effect of morphine when responding in the squirrel monkey is maintained by response-produced electric shock.     

Drug level of d- and l-amphetamine during intravenous self-administration

Rats were allowed to self-administer dextro and levo isomers of amphetamine in doses of 0.25, 0.50, 0.75 and 1.0 mg/kg/injection for 6 h/day. Total body level of drug was calculated at the time of responding for each drug injection. Body level of amphetamine initially increased and then decreased (0–2 h), and thereafter remained relatively constant for the remainder of the experimental session (2–6 h). During 2–6 h of self-administration, calculated whole body levels of both d- and l-amphetamine remained relatively constant across injection doses. In another study, blood was removed several times during 2–6 h at the time of responding for drug injection. Again, no difference in blood level of ¹⁴C-amphetamine was found across a range of injection doses. Mean blood levels were 0.48 g/ml for l-amphetamine and 0.18 g/ml for d-amphetamine. Drug intake averaged 2.0 mg/kg/h for l-amphetamine and 0.79 mg/kg/h for d-amphetamine.     

Role of specific dopamine receptor subtypes in amphetamine discrimination

Biochemical, electrophysiological, and behavioral experiments suggest that the dopamine D-1 and D-2 receptor subtypes functionally interact. In rats trained to discriminate 1.0 mg/kg d-amphetamine, substitution with the D-2 agonist quinpirole (0.1–2.0 mg/kg) produces amphetaminelever responding, whereas the D-1 agonist SKF 38393 (0.3–10.0 mg/kg) elicits only saline-appropriate responding. Combining either quinpirole (0.05–0.5 mg/kg) or SKF 38393 (0.5–10.0 mg/kg) with 0.3 mg/kg d-amphetamine results in dose-dependent increases in amphetamine-lever responding. Conversely, the D-1 antagonist SCH 23390 (0.02–0.1 mg/kg) antagonizes the discrimination produced by 0.7 mg/kg d-amphetamine. Additional combination studies examined the effect of DA receptor drugs on discrimination when quinpirole is substituted in d-amphetamine trained rats. SKF 38393 (0.5–7.0 mg/kg) fails to increase the amphetamine-appropriate lever response produced by either 0.05 or 0.2 mg/kg quinpirole. Similarly, SCH 23390 (0.01–0.1 mg/kg) fails to antagonize the amphetamine-lever responding produced by either 0.2 or 0.5 mg/kg quinpirole. Haloperidol (0.02–0.2 mg/kg) does antagonize the amphetamine-appropriate response produced by quinpirole substitution. The d-amphetamine discrimination studies indicate that stimulating D-2 receptors alone or D-1 receptors in the presence of d-amphetamine yields d-amphetamine-lever responding, and suggests that D-1/D-2 receptors can functionally interact to alter discrimination behavior. Quinpirole substitution, on the other hand, shows an insensitivity to D-1 receptor manipulations.     

Failure of naloxone to modify the effects of chlorpromazine and d-amphetamine on avoidance behavior in the squirrel monkey

Lever-pressing by squirrel monkeys was maintained under a continuous avoidance schedule in which each response postponed for 30 s the delivery of an electric shock to the tail. Dose-response curves were determined for chlorpromazine (0.03–0.3 mg/kg) and d-amphetamine (0.03–1.0 mg/kg) administered alone and administered concomitantly with 1.0 or 10 mg/kg of aaloxone. The dose-response curves for chlorpromazine and d-amphetamine were similar to those previously reported for monkeys under other schedules of shock-maintained behavior: Chlorpromazine decreased responding in a dose-related manner while d-amphetamine increased responding at low doses and disrupted behavior at the highest dose. Naloxone did not modify the effects of chlorpromazine, and d-amphetamine. These results suggest that interactions observed previously between naloxone and nonopiate drugs on behavior in pigeons and rodents are not general phenomena in all animal species.     

Amphetamine and the reward system: Evidence for tolerance and post-drug depression

Existing reports of tolerance to the behavioral effects of d-amphetamine are most parsimoniously interpreted as reflecting behavioral adaptation to the disruptive effects of the drug rather than physiological tolerance. The present study shows that physiological tolerance does develop to the facilitation of self-stimulation behavior which the drug produces. Rats were trained to bar-press for electrical stimulation of the medial forebrain bundle and tested for facilitation of responding following the administration of 0.25 or 0.50 mg/kg d-amphetamine. Testing was terminated for 4 days during which increasing doses (1.0–12.0 mg/kg) of the drug were given. 16 h after the last injection, the test doses (0.25 or 0.50 mg/kg) no longer produced facilitation of self-stimulation. In addition, testing on the following day with no further drug administration showed a depression of responding indicating depression of the sensitivity of the reward system of the brain.     

Effects of chlorpromazine and d-amphetamine on schedule-controlled and schedule-related behavior of rabbits

A lever-lifting response by Dutch Belted and New Zealand White rabbits was maintained in water-deprived animals by 0.25% saccharin solution and in food-deprived animals by food pellets under a multiple 3-min fixed-interval (FI) 30-response fixed-ratio (FR) schedule. Rabbits responding for the saccharin solution had food freely available during the session and in the home cage, whereas those responding for pellets had water continuously available during the session as well as in the home cage. Under nondrug conditions the FR and FI schedules controlled different rates and patterns of responding in the rabbit that were characteristic of those found with other species. In addition, eating or drinking occurred during the inital portion of the FI under the saccharin solution and initial food presentation schedules, respectively. Doses of d-amphetamine (0.1–10.0 mg/kg) increased responding under the FI and FR schedules of food delivery, but increased only FI responding maintained by the saccharin solution. Doses of 3.0–10.0 mg/kg d-amphetamine produced extremely high (300–800% of control) rates of stereotyped perseverative lever responding. Schedule-related eating or drinking were unaffected or decreased at doses of d-amphetamine that increased schedule-controlled responding. Chlorpromazine (0.03–0.3 mg/kg) increased FI responding maintained both by saccharin and food, whereas FR responding generally was unaffected at these dose levels; eating but not drinking was increased with chlorpromazine. Since the behavioral effects of drugs such as amphetamine and chlorpromazine differ somewhat in the rabbit from those found with other typically studied nonhuman mammals, further studies with the rabbit may yield useful information for comparative behavioral pharmacology.     

Antagonism of the behavioral effects of cocaine and d-amphetamine by prazosin

Key pecking by pigeons was maintained under a 30-response fixed-ratio schedule of food delivery; lever pressing by squirrel monkeys was maintained under a 3-min fixed-interval schedule of food delivery. Administered alone, d-amphetamine (0.1–3.0 mg/kg), cocaine (1.0–3.0 mg/kg) and bupropion (1.0–30 mg/kg) either did not affect or decreased fixed-ratio responding of pigeons, whereas d-amphetamine (0.056–0.3 mg/kg) either increased or decreased (0.56 mg/kg) responding of monkeys maintained under the fixed-interval schedule. Prazosin, a selective centrally-active alpha₁ antagonist, produced a dose-dependent reversal of the rate-decreasing effects of d-amphetamine and cocaine but not of bupropion on fixed-ratio responding in pigeons. Prazosin also reversed both the rate-increasing and rate-decreasing effects of d-amphetamine on fixed-interval responding of squirrel monkeys. In contrast, the non-selective alpha-antagonist phentolamine enhanced d-amphetamine-induced decreases in fixed-ratio responding. These findings suggest that the behavioral effects of d-amphetamine and cocaine are produced at least in part by activation of central alpha₁ receptors. Prazosin may be a useful tool for better understanding the mechanisms through which cocaine, amphetamine, and other abused stimulant drugs exert their potent behavioral effects.     

Comparison of the effects of morphine,pentazocine, cyclazocine and amphetamine on intracranial self-stimulation in the rat

Rats were trained to press a lever in order to stimulate their lateral hypothalamus through a chronically implanted electrode. Dose-response curves were determined for the effects of morphine (0.3–10 mg/kg), pentazocine (1.0–30 mg/kg), cyclazocine (0.03–3.0 mg/kg) and d-amphetamine (0.1–3.0 mg/kg) on responding for intracranial stimulation, and then were redetermined in the presence of one or two doses of naloxone. The three analgesics produced only dose-related decreases in responding with the following relative potencies: cyclazocine>morphine>pentazocine. The well-documented rate-increasing effects of d-amphetamine on intracranial self-stimulation were observed at 0.3 and 1.0 mg/kg of the drug; decreases in responding at 3.0 mg/kg were associated with stereotyped behavior. Naloxone, which had no effect of its own on self-stimulation, increased the dose of the analgesics required to depress response rate in a manner consistent with a competitive antagonism. In contrast, response rates were reduced at all doses of d-amphetamine tested in the presence of naloxone. Thus, the interaction between naloxone and d-amphetamine is qualitatively different from the one between naloxone and the analgesics. This finding extends to intracranial self-stimulation the generality of a previous report of interactions between d-amphetamine and naloxone on behavior in the rat.Publication No. 1303 of the Division of Basic Health Sciences of Emory University. This investigation was supported by USPHS Grant DA-00541.Recipient of Research Scientist Development Award K02-DA00008.     

Discriminative stimulus properties of cocaine in pigeons

The present study was designed to assess the discriminative stimulus properties of cocaine in pigeons. Six pigeons were trained to discriminate IM injections of cocaine (2 mg/kg) from saline with responding maintained under a fixed-ratio 30 schedule of food delivery. Cocaine, d-amphetamine, and l-cathinone substituted completely for the training dose of cocaine in all pigeons. When nicotine (0.25–4.0 mg/kg), apomorphine (0.03–1.0 mg/kg), procaine (4–32 mg/kg), and lidocaine (4–16 mg/kg) were substituted, both partial substitutions and individual differences between pigeons were observed. Oxazepam (0.5–4.0 mg/kg) and pentobarbital (2–8 mg/kg) failed to substitute for the training dose of cocaine. Discriminative stimulus control by cocaine was greatest when the drug was administered 10–40 min prior to the session and the effects disappeared after 2 h. The substitution results indicate drug class specificity of the cocaine cue but, in addition, suggest its multidimensional nature.     

Effects of d-amphetamine,scopolamine, chlordiazepoxide and diphenylhydantoin on self-stimulation behavior and brain acetylcholine

The effects of d-amphetamine (0.25–8), scopolamine (0.25–8), chlordiazepoxide (2.5–40), and diphenylhydantoin (25–75), given i.p. or s.c. on a mg/kg basis, were studied on self-stimulation behavior in the male albino rat. The dose-effect relationships, the role of baseline rates of responding and their effects on brain acetylcholine (ACh) were determined in rats trained to self-stimulate for electrical reward in the lateral posterior hypothalamus. The effects of d-amphetamine were both dose and baseline-rate dependent. Low-moderate doses (0.5–2.0 mg/kg inclusive) facilitated self-stimulation and larger doses (2.0 to 8.0 mg/kg) depressed responding. Baseline rates before d-amphetamine administration were extremely important in the effect observed. Low rates of responding were facilitated and high rates were depressed by this agent. The effects of scopolamine in a wide range of dosage were less consistent. A small dose (0.5 mg/kg) facilitated only transiently self-stimulation and larger doses (1–8 mg/kg) tended to depress this behavior. Baseline rate effects were less important but high-rate responders were usually depressed by scopolamine.The effects of chlordiazepoxide were dose-dependent. A dose of (5 mg/kg) caused facilitation but larger doses (10–40 mg/kg) produced depression of selfstimulation irrespective of baseline rates. However, high-rate stimulators showed the most dramatic increases with 5 mg/kg of chlordiazepoxide. In contrast, diphenylhydantoin (25–75 mg/kg) usually depressed self-stimulation. Low rate self-stimulators showed the most marked depressant effects.Brain ACh was progressively reduced by handling of naive animals, injection of saline, and 1/2 h of self-stimulation and escape behavior. Animals not allowed to self-stimulate but given d-amphetamine (2.0 mg/kg), scopolamine (2.0 mg/kg) showed a significant decrease in brain ACh. Self-stimulation, in addition to medication with the various drugs, showed a trend for further reduction in brain ACh but the differences were not statistically significant.Supported in part by Grant MH-11846 (to EID) and MH-11627 (to JO), U.S. Public Health Service.     

Interactions of naloxone with morphine,amphetamine and phencyclidine on fixed interval responding for intracranial self-stimulation in rats

Rats were implanted with stimulating electrodes aimed at the medial forebrain bundle-lateral hypothalamus (MFB-LH) and were trained to lever-press for brain self-stimulation on a fixed interval: 60 s schedule of reinforcement. The effects of graded doses of naloxone (0.1–30 mg/kg), morphine (0.3–5.6 mg/kg), naloxone plus morphine,d-amphetamine (0.03–1.0 mg/kg), naloxone plusd-amphetamine, phencyclidine (0.3–5.6 mg/kg), and naloxone plus phencyclidine were tested. Naloxone produced a significant decrease in rates at 30 mg/kg. Naloxone (0.1–1.0 mg/kg) plus morphine blocked the dose-dependent decrease produced by morphine alone. In contrast, naloxone (1.0–10 mg/kg) plusd-amphetamine attenuated the graded increase in response rates produced byd-amphetamine. Naloxone (1.0–10 mg/kg) plus phencyclidine did not reliably change the increase in response rates produced by phencyclidine alone. The use of the fixed interval schedule of brain self-stimulation to study these drug interactions is novel, and further demonstrates that the highly reinforcing aspects of brain stimulation, known to be influenced by dopamine, may also be modulated by the endogenous opiate system.     

Effects of d-amphetamine and morphine on delayed discrimination: Signal detection analysis and assessment of response repetition in the performance deficits

Signal detection analysis was used to examine the effects of d-amphetamine and of morphine on delayed visual discrimination (delay intervals: 0–4–8–16 s) in male rats. The probability of response repetition in the discrete trial two-choice discrimination procedure was used as an additional behavioral measure. d-Amphetamine (0.16–0.33 mg/kg) decreased SI (a measure of the animals' sensitivity to the discriminative stimuli) at delays between stimulus presentation and opportunity for responding of 4–16 s, and did not affect SI at the 0 s delay. Morphine (1–3 mg/kg) decreased SI at all delay conditions. d-Amphetamine, but not morphine, affected RI (a measure of the animals' bias towards responding on one lever or the other) and increased the probability of response repetition. The bias measure B was affected neither by d-amphetamine nor by morphine. It is concluded that d-amphetamine, but not morphine, produces a deterioration of delayed discrimination performance, probably as a result of drug-induced response perseveration. It is suggested that under the conditions of the present study, the selective deterioration of discrimination performance after d-amphetamine at delays which are longer than 0 s may not be primarily related to a drug-induced disruption of a short-term memory mechanism, but may be related to drug effects on response output.     

Quantitative assessment of the microstructure of rat behavior: II. Distinctive effects of dopamine releasers and uptake inhibitors

The effects of four indirect dopamine agonists,d-amphetamine (0.25–4.0 mg/kg), cocaine (2.5–40.0 mg/kg), GBR 12909 (10.0–30.0 mg/kg), and nomifensine (5.0–20.0 mg/kg), on the behavioral organization of movements in an unconditioned motor paradigm were investigated in rats. The extended scaling hypothesis using the fluctuation spectrum of local spatial scaling exponents was used to quantify the geometrical characteristics of movements. The results reveal a qualitatively similar disruption of behavioral organization by lower doses of these drugs. Specifically, rats treated withd-amphetamine (<2.0 mg/kg), cocaine (<20.0 mg/kg), GBR 12909 (<20.0 mg/kg), or nomifensine (<10.0 mg/kg) exhibited a reduced range in the fluctuation spectrum, reflecting a predominance of meandering movements with local spatial scaling exponents between 1.3 and 1.7. This reduction was accompanied dynamically by a reduced predictability of movement sequences as measured by the dynamical entropy,h. By contrast, higher doses of these drugs produced distinctly different changes in behavioral organization. In particular, 4.0 mg/kgd-amphetamine and 40.0 mg/kg cocaine increased the fluctuation range, reflecting relative increases in both straight and circumscribed movements that are interpreted as a combination of spatially extended and local perseveration. In contrast, high doses of 30.0 mg/kg GBR 12909 and 20.0 mg/kg nomifensine induced only local perseveration. High doses ofd-amphetamine, cocaine, GBR 12909 and nomifensine reduced the dynamical entropy,h, indicating an increased predictability of the movement sequences. These results suggest that the generic behavioral change induced by low doses of dopamine agonists is characterized by a reduced variety of path patterns coupled with an increased variability in sequential movement sequences. The differential effects of higher doses of these drugs may be due to their influences on other neurotransmitter systems or differential affinities for different dopamine subsystems.     

Can the DRL 72s schedule selectively reveal antidepressant drug activity?

The effects of three antidepressants, desipramine (2.5–20 mg/kg) tranylcypromine (0.63–2.5 mg/kg) mianserin (1.25–10 mg/kg) and three non-antidepressants, chlordiazepoxide (CDP; 1.25–10 mg/kg) haloperidol (0.02–0.16 mg/kg)d-amphetamine (0.31–1.25 mg/kg) were evaluated in rats responding for water reinforcement under a DRL 72s schedule. The antidepressants all produced dose-related decreases in overall response rates, but no significant changes in reinforcement frequency. In contrast, the anxiolytic CDP did increase the number of reinforcers obtained. Haloperidol decreased both reinforcers and responses whilstd-amphetamine stimulated responding, thereby decreasing reinforcement frequency. An analysis of the modes of inter-response times (IRTs) revealed no significant shifts in the peaks of the IRT distributions for most of the drugs tested. Amphetamine, however, (0.31 and 0.63 mg/kg) decreased the modal values in correspondence with the shift to the left of the peak of responding caused by this compound. These results are discussed in the context of the use of the DRL 72s procedure as a screening test for antidepressant drugs.     

Dose-response effects of d-amphetamine on passive avoidance learning in the rat

Trials and errors to learning a passive avoidance response were assessed in 63 albino rats injected subcutaneously with d-amphetamine, in amounts ranging from 0–7 mg/kg body weight. Both measures indicated dose-response effects on responding; animals under either low or high doses of d-amphetamine made significantly less errors and took significantly fewer trials to learn the response than did middle dosage animals. The scores of the lower and higher dosage animals did not differ from the nondrug control group. Results are discussed in terms of amphetamine stereotypy.     

Effects of triadimefon on a multiple schedule of fixed-interval performance: Comparison with methylphenidate, d-amphetamine and chlorpromazine

Triadimefon is a fungicide that has recently been shown to increase motor activity and rates of schedule-controlled responding. These findings indicate that triadimefon resembles psychomotor stimulants and in this respect is a unique pesticide. The present experiment was designed to evaluate triadimefon's effects on performance maintained by a multiple schedule of reinforcement and to compare triadimefon to known psychomotor stimulants. Four rats were trained to perform under a mult FI 1-min FI 5-min schedule of milk reinforcement. They then received a series of dosages of triadimefon (10–170 mg/kg, IP) and of methylphenidate (1–17.3 mg/kg, IP) in a counterbalanced order. Triadimefon increased response rates in both the FI 1-min and FI 5-min components. Methylphenidate did not consistently alter response rates in either component. Temporal patterns of responding were disrupted much more in the FI 5-min component than in the FI 1-min component by both triadimefon and methylphenidate. Performances were then evaluated following a series of dosages of d-amphetamine (0.3–3.0 mg/kg, IP) and chlorpromazine (0.5–2.0 mg/kg, IP). Response rates were increased d-amphetamine in the FI 1-min component but not in the FI 5-min component. Like triadimefon and methylphenidate, d-amphetamine produced a greater disruption of response patterning in FI 5-min than in FI 1-min. Only chlorpromazine decreased response rates in both components. Chlorpromazine also disrupted FI 5-min response patterning, but left FI 1-min patterning intact. Although triadimefon did not closely resemble any of the comparison drugs, it had opposite effects on response rates from chlorpromazine in both components of the schedule and resembled d-amphetamine in its effects on FI 1-min response rates. The rate-increasing effects frequently obtained with psychomotor stimulants were more evident for triadimefon than for either methylphenidate or d-amphetamine.     

Intravenous self-administration of cocaine and norcocaine by dogs

The potency of cocaine, relative to d-amphetamine, to initiate and maintain intravenous self-administration behavior by dogs (n=5) was determined. Response-contingent infusions of cocaine (at unit doses of 0.15, 0.30 and 0.60 mg/kg/infusion) and d-amphetamine (at unit doses of 0.05 and 0.10 mg/kg/infusion) were available during daily 4-h sessions on a FR1 reinforcement schedule. By comparing the dose-response curves of the two drugs, it was found that 1 mg of amphetamine is equivalent to 5.3 mg of cocaine (95% confidence limits=3.8–9.1 mg). In a second experiment, pretreatment with the -adrenergic antagonist phenoxybenzamine (in doses ranging from 0.125–2.0 mg/kg, IV) did not produce any appreciable changes in responding for cocaine (0.2 mg/kg/infusion) by dogs (n=9). In contrast, when the same animals were pretreated with the dopaminergic antagonist pimozide (in doses ranging from 5–40 mg/kg, IV), subsequent responding for cocaine was increased in a dose-dependent manner. In a third experiment it was determined that norcocaine, the N-demethylated metabolite of cocaine, would maintain self-administration behavior by dogs (n=4) when it was substituted for cocaine. As expected, when saline was substituted for cocaine, responding was not maintained.A preliminary report of these studies was presented at the 61st Annual Meeting, Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology, April 1977 (Fed. Proc. 36: 1040, 1977)     

Stimulus properties of thyrotropin-releasing hormone

Male Sprague-Dawley rats were trained in a two-lever operant discrimination task using 20 mg/kg thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH) and saline as cues. Following completion of 40 daily training sessions, 22 of 25 subjects demonstrated a high level of discriminative responding based on the TRH and saline cues. An evaluation of the time course of TRH indicated that the stimulus properties peak between 5 and 15 min and dissipate substantially by 55–65 min. During additional testing, rats showed dose-dependent generalization between the training treatments (20 mg/kg TRH and saline) and novel doses of TRH (1, 5, 10, and 40 mg/kg). However, animals failed to show generalization between the training drug (20 mg/kg TRH) and d-amphetamine sulfate (0.8, 1.6, or 2.4 mg/kg); likewise, animals trained to discriminate d-amphetamine (0.8 or 1.6 mg/kg) from saline failed to show generalization between d-amphetamine and TRH (10, 20, or 30 mg/kg). Microgram quantities of TRH (2.5–25 g) administered into either the lateral or third ventricle elicited dose-dependent generalization to the training drug (TRH 20 mg/kg, i.p.), suggesting a CNS mechanism of action for this effect of TRH.