Efficacy and toxicity of concurrent chemoradiotherapy in patients with advanced oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma

Purpose

The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and toxicity of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) with docetaxel, cisplatin (CDDP) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) (TPF regimen) or with CDDP, 5-FU, methotrexate and leucovorin (PFML regimen) in previously untreated patients with advanced oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC).

Methods

Fifty-six eligible patients with stage III or IV oropharyngeal SCC were treated with CCRT. Forty-four patients were men and 12 were women, and the average age of the patients was 58.8?years (range, 37?C72?years). In the TPF group, patients received CCRT with the TPF regimen [docetaxel (50?mg/m², day 1), CDDP (60?mg/m², day 4) and a continuous 5-FU infusion (600?mg/m²/day, days 1?C5)]. In the PFML group, patients received CCRT with the PFML regimen [CDDP (60?mg/m², day 4), a continuous 5-FU infusion (600?mg/m²/day, days 1?C5), methotrexate (30?mg/m², day 1) and leucovorin (10?mg/m²/day, days 1?C5)]. The total radiation dose was between 66.6 and 70.2?Gy.

Results

The overall 5-year survival rate was 64.6% in all patients, 68.6% in the resectable group and 47.4% in the unresectable group. The 5-year disease-specific survival rate was 72.2% in all patients, 78.1% in the resectable group and 47.7% in the unresectable group. Regarding clinical stage, the 5-year disease-specific survival rates were 91% in stage III, 72% in stage IVa and 44% in stage IVb.

Conclusion

CCRT with TPF or PFML regimen for advanced oropharyngeal SCC is tolerable and effective, especially in patients with resectable disease.     

Phase I dose-escalating study of 24-h continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil in combination with weekly docetaxel and cisplatin in patients with advanced gastric cancer

Purpose

To determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of a 24-h continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) when administered in combination with a fixed weekly dose of docetaxel and cisplatin in patients with advanced gastric cancer.

Methods

Patients with advanced gastric adenocarcinoma (n = 21) received a weekly regimen of docetaxel, cisplatin and 5-FU (DCF) for 3 consecutive weeks every 4 weeks. The doses of docetaxel and cisplatin were fixed at 33.3 and 30 mg/m², respectively. The dose of 5-FU was increased from a starting dose of 1,000 mg/m² to the MTD.

Results

A total of 53 cycles of chemotherapy were administered (median = 3 cycles/patient). The MTD of 5-FU was 1,750 mg/m². All 21 patients were assessed for toxicity and 19 patients (90%) were evaluated for response. Both grade 3–4 hematologic and non-hematologic toxicities occurred in less than 10% of patients and there were no treatment-related deaths. Among the 19 patients, we observed 1 complete and 4 partial responses for an overall response rate of 26% (95% CI: 6–46%). This rate increased to 39% (95% CI: 12–66%) in 13 chemotherapy-naïve patients.

Conclusions

A consecutive weekly DCF regimen at 4-week intervals appears feasible for advanced gastric cancer with a favorable toxicity profile. The recommended doses are 33.3 mg/m² of docetaxel, 30 mg/m² of cisplatin and 1,500 mg/m² of a 24-h continuous intravenous infusion of 5-FU. The response of this weekly regimen in our study was favorable and deserved further investigation in a phase II trial.     

Biweekly docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil (DCF) chemotherapy for advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a phase I dose-escalation study

Background and purpose

The optimal chemotherapeutic protocol for the treatment of esophageal cancer has not yet been established. A dose-escalation study of docetaxel combined with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) was performed to determine the optimal dose in patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Patients and method

We studied a total of 18 patients who had previously untreated thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma with T4 tumors and/or metastasis. The patients received an infusion of docetaxel at different dose levels (levels 1, 2, 3: 30, 35, 40 mg/m², respectively) and an infusion of cisplatin (40 mg/m²) on days 1 and 15 plus a continuous infusion of 5-FU (400 mg/m²/day) on days 1–5 and 15–19.

Results

Dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) included febrile neutropenia and leukopenia. DLT occurred in 2 of 6 patients at level 1, 2 and in 3 of 6 patients at level 3. The response rate was 88.9%, including a complete response rate of 33.3%.

Conclusions

To minimize toxicity and maximize dose intensity, we elected to investigate a biweekly regimen. The maximum tolerated dose was level 3, and the recommended dose was determined to be docetaxel 35 mg/m² with cisplatin 40 mg/m² plus 5-FU 400 mg/m², administered biweekly. This regimen was tolerable and highly active. A phase II study has been started.     

A multicenter phase II study of combined chemotherapy with docetaxel, cisplatin, and S-1 in patients with unresectable or recurrent gastric cancer (KDOG 0601)

Purpose

We conducted a phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a triplet regimen of docetaxel, cisplatin, and S-1 in patients with unresectable or recurrent gastric cancer.

Methods

Docetaxel (40?mg/m²) and cisplatin (70 or 60?mg/m²) were given on day 1 of a 28-day cycle. S-1 (40?mg/m²) was given twice daily on days 1?C14. Treatment with this regimen was continued for a maximum of 6 cycles. Subsequently, patients with no disease progression received a combination of docetaxel and S-1.

Results

Fifty-nine patients were enrolled. The median number of administered cycles was 8 (range, 1?C25). Because some patients had serious myelosuppression and renal dysfunction with 70?mg/m² of cisplatin, dose of cisplatin was reduced to 60?mg/m² after 19 patients had been treated. Common severe toxic effects of grade 3 or 4 were leukocytopenia (44%), neutropenia (72%), anemia (15%), and febrile neutropenia (14%). The overall response rate of this group was 81% (95% confidence interval (CI), 71?C91%). The median overall survival and progression-free survival were 18.5 (95% CI, 15.6?C21.5) and 8.7 (95% CI, 6.7?C10.7) months, respectively.

Conclusions

Triplet of docetaxel, cisplatin, and S-1 is a well-tolerated and highly active regimen for advanced or recurrent gastric cancer. A 60?mg/m² of cisplatin is as effective as 70?mg/m² of cisplatin.     

Biweekly docetaxel,fluorouracil, leucovorin,oxaliplatin (TEF) as first-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer and adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction: safety and efficacy in a multicenter cohort

Background

Docetaxel–cisplatin-5-FU chemotherapy is superior to 5-FU-cisplatin in terms of response rate and survival in advanced gastric cancer (AGC), but is more toxic. Oxaliplatin is better tolerated than cisplatin, which it can effectively replace in this setting. We hypothesize that incorporating docetaxel into a simplified FOLFOX regimen should be a tolerable and effective option in first-line treatment of AGC.

Methods

Data were collected at six  French centers from patients with metastatic or local AGC who received docetaxel, fluorouracil, leucovorin, or oxaliplatin (TEF) as first-line treatment. TEF was administered as follows: docetaxel (50 mg/m²), oxaliplatin (85 mg/m²), and leucovorin (40 mg/m²) on day 1, and 5-FU continuous infusion for 48 h (2400 mg/m²) every 2 weeks.

Results

Forty-one patients were enrolled. Performance status was grade 0 and 1 in respectively 27 and 58 % of patients; 17 patients had adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction; 37 patients had metastatic disease, 22 had a poorly differentiated or diffuse type. Objective response rate was 66 %, with a complete response in two patients (5 %). Median progression-free survival and overall survival were respectively 6.3 and 12.1 months. Tolerability was acceptable with no treatment-related deaths. The most frequent grade 3–4 toxicities were neutropenia (30 %) and neuropathy (12.5 %). Curative intent surgery after response to TEF was performed in seven patients (17 %).

Conclusion

TEF is an effective first-line treatment with an acceptable toxicity profile for patients with AGC. It may allow curative resection in initially unresectable patients. TEF should now be evaluated in prospective randomized trials.     

Phase II study of FOLFIRI regimen in patients with advanced colorectal cancer refractory to fluoropyrimidine and oxaliplatin

Purpose

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of FOLFIRI regimen in patients with advanced colorectal cancer refractory to fluoropyrimidine and oxaliplatin.

Methods

The FOLFIRI regimen consisted of intravenous infusion of irinotecan 180?mg/m² on day 1 plus leucovorin (LV) 400?mg/m² on day 1 plus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) 400?mg/m² bolus on day 1 plus 46-hour intravenous infusion of 5-FU 2,400?mg/m², every 2?weeks as one cycle. The main selection criterion for this study was the advanced colorectal cancer refractory to fluoropyrimidine and oxaliplatin.

Results

Of the 57 evaluable patients for efficacy, 4 (7.5%) had a partial response, 36 (67.9%) had stable disease, and 13 (24.5%) had progressive disease. Median progression-free survival was 4.8?months (95% CI 3.9?C5.7?months), and median overall survival was 7.8?months (95% CI 13.1?C16.5?months). Safety analysis was based on the data of 57 evaluable patients. The most frequently observed grade 3 or 4 toxicities were neutropenia 16 (27.8%), nausea/vomiting 7 (12.3%), and diarrhea 1 (1.8%).

Conclusion

FOLFIRI regimen is effective and well tolerated in patients with advanced colorectal cancer refractory to fluoropyrimidine and oxaliplatin in Chinese population.     

Concurrent chemoradiation followed by adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma in Korea

Purpose

Concomitant approach using cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) has shown an excellent local control rate and significantly reduced distant metastasis in patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). However, optimal schedule and dosing of chemotherapy still need to be developed to reduce distant metastasis. This retrospective study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy, toxicity, and tolerability of a concurrent chemoradiation therapy (CCRT) regimen using cisplatin and 5-FU followed by adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) in patients with locoregioanlly advanced NPC.

Methods

Forty-three NPC patients who had AJCC stage T3/T4 or N2/N3 and M0 disease were evaluated. The chemotherapy during CCRT consisted of cisplatin (75 mg/m² on day 1) plus 5-FU (750 mg/m²/day on day 1–5), delivered every 4 weeks for two cycles. Three cycles of AC were given with cisplatin (75 mg/m²), epirubicin (37.5 mg/m²) on day 1, and bleomycin (7.5 mg/m² bolus iv. on day 1 followed by 9 mg/m² on day 1–5 by continuous infusion) every 3 weeks.

Results

The overall response rate after CCRT was 95% (22 CRs and 19 PRs in 43) and 100% (16 CRs and 8 PRs in 24) after AC. Grade 3/4 neutropenia, mucositis, and weight loss were observed during CCRT phase in 18, 44, and 26% of patients, respectively. AC caused grade 3/4 neutropenia and emesis in 12.5 and 20.8% of patients, respectively.

Conclusions

CCRT regimen using cisplatin and 5-FU followed by three cycles of BEC chemotherapy was effective in locally advanced NPC patients, with acceptable and reversible acute toxicities.     

Sequential chemotherapy with dose-dense docetaxel, cisplatin, folinic acid and 5-fluorouracil (TCF-dd) followed by combination of oxaliplatin, folinic acid, 5-fluorouracil and irinotecan (COFFI) in metastatic gastric cancer: results of a phase II trial

Purpose

To evaluate a new strategy of two sequential, intensified chemotherapy regimens in metastatic gastric cancer.

Patients and methods

Chemo-na?ve patients with metastatic gastric cancer were enrolled to receive 4 cycles of TCF-dd (docetaxel initially 85?mg/m² and cisplatin initially 75?mg/m² on day 1 [later modified due to toxicity: 70 and 60?mg/m² respectively], l-folinic acid 100?mg/m² on days 1 and 2, 5-fluorouracil 400?mg/m² bolus and then 600?mg/m² as a 22?h continuous infusion on day 1 and 2, every 14?days). Subsequently, patients with CR, PR or SD received 4 cycles of COFFI (oxaliplatin 85?mg/m², irinotecan 140?mg/m², l-folinic acid 200?mg/m², 5-fluorouracil bolus 400?mg/m² on day 1 followed by 2,400?mg/m² as a 48?h continuous infusion, every 14?days). In both regimens pegfilgrastim 6?mg subcutaneously on day 3 was included.

Results

Forty consecutive patients were enrolled. TCF-dd regimen achieved an ORR of 55% (95% CI, 40?C70). Twenty-three patients proceeded to COFFI. After this regimen the ORR was then increased to 60% (95% CI, 45?C75). Among the 21 patients treated with TCF-dd after the protocol amendments, main grade 3?C4 toxicities were: neutropenia (29%), thrombocytopenia (19%), asthenia (24%) and diarrhea (14%). COFFI caused grade 3?C4 neutropenia (all not febrile) and diarrhea in 35% and 17% of patients respectively.

Conclusions

A sequential strategy with TCF-dd followed by COFFI is very active and may be of special interest in selected patients.     

Phase I study of 3-weekly docetaxel, capecitabine and oxaliplatin combination chemotherapy in patients with previously untreated advanced gastric cancer

Purpose

Adding docetaxel to cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) (DCF) significantly improved clinical efficacy in advanced gastric cancer (AGC). To further improve the efficacy and tolerability, we substituted oxaliplatin for cisplatin and capecitabine for 5-FU in the DCF regimen and performed a phase I study to determine the recommended dose (RD) and dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of docetaxel, capecitabine and oxaliplatin (DXO) combination in patients with AGC.

Materials and methods

Previously untreated patients with histologically proven metastatic AGC and ECOG performance status 0–2 were enrolled. Docetaxel and oxaliplatin were administered i.v. on day 1. Capecitabine was administered orally bid on days 1–14. Each cycle was repeated every 3 weeks. DLTs were evaluated during the first two cycles of treatment.

Results

Twenty-one patients were enrolled: 15 patients in dose-escalation phase and 6 patients in the extension at the RD. Median age was 50 years (range 21–65 years). At dose level 3 (60 mg/m² docetaxel, 1,000 mg/m² capecitabine, 100 mg/m² oxaliplatin), 1 diarrhea (DLT) was found among 6 patients while at dose level 4 (60 mg/m² docetaxel, 800 mg/m² capecitabine, 130 mg/m² oxaliplatin), 2 DLTs (febrile neutropenia and diarrhea) were observed among 3 patients. Therefore, the dose level 3 was determined as RD. DLTs include grade 3 diarrhea and febrile neutropenia. Cumulative (all cycles) grade 3/4 toxicity included neutropenia (75%), leucopenia (50%), febrile neutropenia (25%), diarrhea (17%), and neuropathy (17%). Of 14 patients with measurable lesions, 11 achieved partial response and 3 showed stable disease.

Conclusion

The RD of the DXO regimen in patients with AGC is capecitabine 1,000 mg/m² twice daily on days 1–14, in combination with decetaxel 60 mg/m² (day 1) and oxaliplatin 100 mg/m² (day 1) repeated every 3 weeks. The DXO regimen seems to have promising activity and offers an easy alternative to DCF. The toxicities appear to be still substantial, but manageable.     

A randomised phase II trial of two sequential schedules of docetaxel and cisplatin followed by gemcitabine in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

Purpose

The aim of this study was to determine the activity and toxicity of two sequential chemotherapy regimens in the first-line treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods

Eighty-eight chemonaive patients with stage IIIB/IV NSCLC were randomised to receive either three cycles of 75?mg/m² cisplatin plus 75?mg/m² docetaxel, both administered on day 1 every 21?days, followed by three cycles of 1,200?mg/m² gemcitabine on days 1 and 8 every 3?weeks (arm A), or three cycles of 25?mg/m² cisplatin plus 25?mg/m² docetaxel on days 1, 8 and 15 every 28?days, followed by three cycles of 1,200?mg/m² gemcitabine on days 1 and 8 every 3?weeks (arm B).

Results

Of the evaluable patients, 61% in arm A (n?=?41) and 36% (n?=?44) in arm B completed treatment as per the protocol. The best tumour response rates were as follows (arm A and arm B): complete response: 2.4 and 2.3%; partial response: 39 and 20.4%; stable disease: 26.8 and 13.6%; and progressive disease: 31.8 and 45.4%. The median progression-free and overall survival were 3.9 and 12.3?months in arm A, respectively, 3.1 and 7.7?months in arm B. Grade 3?C4 adverse events were more common in arm A. Grade 3?C4 neutropenia was the main toxicity observed (56.1% in arm A and 11.4% in arm B).

Conclusions

Our data demonstrate the feasibility of a sequential approach of cisplatin plus docetaxel followed by single-agent gemcitabine. Weekly administration of platinum-docetaxel is associated with an improved safety profile but lower efficacy than the conventional three-weekly schedule (registration ID 2004-001044-72).     

Irinotecan combined with 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin third-line chemotherapy after failure of fluoropyrimidine, platinum, and taxane in gastric cancer: treatment outcomes and a prognostic model to predict survival

Background

The aim of this study was to evaluate the activity and safety of the combination chemotherapy of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), leucovorin, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI regimen) after failure of fluoropyrimidine, platinum, and taxane in gastric cancer (GC) and to evaluate the prognostic factors for survival.

Methods

Patients received biweekly FOLFIRI chemotherapy as third-line treatment. The FOLFIRI-1 consisted of irinotecan (180 mg/m² in a 2-h infusion) on day 1, and then leucovorin (200 mg/m² in a 2-h infusion) and 5-FU (a 400 mg/m² bolus, followed by 600 mg/m² in a 22-h continuous infusion) on days 1 and 2. FOLFIRI-2 consisted of irinotecan (180 mg/m² in a 2-h infusion) on day 1, and then leucovorin (400 mg/m² in a 2-h infusion) and 5-FU (a 400 mg/m² bolus, followed by 2400 mg/m² in a 46-h continuous infusion) on day 1.

Results

A total of 158 patients were included. The overall response rate was 9.6 % in patients with measurable lesions. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 2.1 months [95 % confidence interval (CI), 1.7–2.5] and 5.6 months (95 % CI, 4.7–6.5), respectively. The major grade 3/4 toxicity was myelosuppression (36.7 %). Good performance status (PS), fewer metastatic sites, and longer duration from the first-line to third-line chemotherapy were independent prognostic factors affecting both PFS and OS.

Conclusions

The FOLFIRI regimen showed antitumor activity and tolerable toxicity profiles against advanced GC in the third-line setting. Patients with good PS, fewer metastatic sites and longer previous treatment duration might have the maximal benefit from third-line chemotherapy.     

FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab as a first-line treatment for Japanese patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a JACCRO CC-03 multicenter phase II study

Purpose

The purpose of this multicenter phase II study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a combination of irinotecan, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), and leucovorin (FOLFIRI) plus bevacizumab as first-line chemotherapy in Japanese patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

Methods

Patients with metastatic colorectal cancer were eligible for enrollment. On day 1 of a 14-day cycle, patients received bevacizumab 5 mg/kg, irinotecan 150 mg/m², and l-leucovorin 200 mg/m² as an intravenous infusion, followed by 5-FU 400 mg/m² as an intravenous bolus and then 5-FU 2,400 mg/m² as an 46-h intravenous infusion. This treatment cycle was repeated. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS).

Results

We enrolled 40 patients, but one withdrew consent before starting treatment. The remaining 39 patients received a total of 509 cycles of FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab (median 11 per patient; range 1–30). The median PFS was 11.5 months, the median overall survival (OS) was 22.0 months, and the 1-year OS rate was 81.8 %. All 39 patients had adverse events. Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia and stomatitis occurred in 21 (53.9 %) and 4 (10.3 %) patients, respectively.

Conclusion

Our results suggest that FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab is a clinically effective regimen with a manageable toxicity profile as first-line chemotherapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.     

Phase II clinical trial of 5-fluorouracil, trimetrexate, and leucovorin (NFL) in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer

Background. Advanced pancreatic cancer has limited treatment options. 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) is frequently used in the treatment of pancreatic cancer. Preclinical studies suggest synergism between trimetrexate (TMTX), 5-FU, and leucovorin (NFL). Aim. We conducted a phase II trial to evaluate the activity and safety of NFL in pancreatic cancer. Method. Eligible patients (n=21) with untreated advanced pancreatic cancer were treated with 110 mg/m² intravenous (IV) THTX on day 1 and 200 mg/m² IV leucovorin prior to 500 mg/m² IV 5-FU on day 2. Oral leucovorin (15 mg every 6 h for seven doses) started intravenous 24 h later. Results. Treatment was administered for 6 wk followed by a 2-wk rest period. Response was evaluated every 8 wk. All patients were evaluable for response and toxicity. Most patients (80%) had distant metastases. Forty-five cycles of chemotherapy were administered. The most common serious toxicities were Grade 3 diarrhea (23.8%) and nausea and vomiting (14.2%). The response rate was 4.1% (95% CI, 0–23%), median survival was 6.8 mo, and 1-yr survival was 19%. Conclusion. Treatment with NFL is well-tolerated in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. The median survival and 1-yr survival in these patients with poor prognosis compares favorably with other treatment options.     

Phase I/II study of irinotecan, UFT and leucovorin with hepatic arterial infusion using 5-FU in colorectal cancer patients with unresectable liver metastases

Purpose

To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of systemic chemotherapy with irinotecan (CPT-11), UFT and leucovorin (LV) combined with hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) consisting of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in colorectal cancer patients with unresectable liver metastases.

Methods

Patients were treated concurrently with escalating doses of intravenous CPT-11 (100, 120, and 140?mg/m²) on day 1 of each 14-day treatment cycle, with oral UFT (300?mg/m² per day) and LV (75?mg/body per day) on days 1?C7 of each cycle, and with HAI 5-FU (2,000?mg/week) on days 8?C14 of each cycle.

Results

Twelve patients were enrolled in the phase I study. The maximum-tolerated dose was not reached. Consequently, the recommended dose of CPT-11 for the phase II study was determined to be 140?mg/m². Twenty-two patients were evaluated in the phase II study. Five patients experienced grade 3 neutropenia, two experienced grade 3 anorexia, two experienced nausea, and two experienced vomiting. An overall response was observed in 19 out of 22 patients (86.4%). The median progression-free survival period was 11.2?months, and the 3-year survival rate was 50.6%. Fourteen patients (63.6%) were ultimately able to undergo a complete liver resection.

Conclusions

Chemotherapy with CPT-11 and UFT/LV combined with HAI yielded a high response rate and enabled a significant proportion of patients with initially unresectable liver metastases to undergo surgical resection. Further trials are warranted.     

Chemotherapy with gemcitabine, cisplatin, and docetaxel in the treatment for patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a multicenter phase II study of the Hellenic Oncology Research Group (HORG)

Purpose

To assess the antitumor activity and toxicity of gemcitabine, cisplatin, and docetaxel (GCD) regimen in patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer.

Patient and methods

Chemotherapy-na?ve patients, aged ??70?years with measurable or evaluable disease and a performance status (PS) of 0?C2 were treated with sequential cisplatin 80?mg/m² (d1), gemcitabine 1,100?mg/m² (d1 and d14), and docetaxel 80?mg/m² (d14) every 28?days.

Results

Sixty patients with an ECOG PS of 0?C2 were enroled. Most (71.7%) patients had stage IV disease. A median number of 4 chemotherapy cycles per patient (range, 1?C9) was administered. Eight (13.3%) patients achieved a CR and 16 (26.7%) a partial response (PR) (intention-to-treat: ORR 40%; 95% CI 27.6?C52.4%). Thirteen (21.7%) and 23 (38.3%) patients experienced stable and progressive disease, respectively. The median time to progression (TTP) was 7.7?months (range, 0.7?C43.4), and the median overall survival 21.4?months (range, 0.7?C68.6). Grade 3 and 4 neutropenia occurred in 27 (45%) patients and grade 3 and 4 thrombocytopenia in five (8.3%). Three (5%) patients developed febrile neutropenia. There were no treatment-related deaths. Severe non-haematological toxicity was infrequent.

Conclusions

The GCD combination is an active and well-tolerated regimen in patients with chemotherapy-naive locally advanced or metastatic TCC and merits to be further investigated.     

Phase II study of docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-FU induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiotherapy in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal cancer

Purpose

This study sought to determine the feasibility and safety of induction chemotherapy with docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) triple combination chemotherapy (TPF) followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) for locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC).

Methods

Patients with advanced NPC were treated with three cycles of induction chemotherapy. Docetaxel (70 mg/m²) and cisplatin (75 mg/m²) were given on day 1, followed by 5-FU (1,000 mg/m²) as a continuous infusion for 4 days. After induction chemotherapy, cisplatin was given at a dose of 100 mg/m² every 3 weeks with radiotherapy.

Results

Thirty-three patients were enrolled; all patients were stage III (n = 4, 12.1%) or IV (n = 29, 87.9%). Among the patients, 32 patients completed both induction TPF therapy and CCRT, with responses as follows: five patients (15.2%) achieved a complete response (CR), and 27 patients (81.8%) a partial response (PR). At 6 weeks after CCRT, 23 patients (69.7%) had a CR and 9 patients (27.3%) a PR. The 3-year progression-free survival was 75.6% and the 3-year overall survival was 86.1%. Neutropenia (72.7%), febrile neutropenia (9.1%), and nausea (9.1%) were the most severe toxicities (grade 3–4) during induction chemotherapy, and mucositis (39.4%), fatigue (15.2%), and nausea (9.1%) were the most common toxicities (grade 3–4) during CCRT.

Conclusions

Although most patients had stage IV NPC, the TPF induction chemotherapy followed by CCRT showed promising activity with manageable toxicity. These results demonstrated the possibility of effective treatment with the aim of not only a palliative, but also a curative, approach to the treatment of advanced NPC.     

Randomized trial of weekly docetaxel and cisplatin combined with concurrent 3DCRT in patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer

Objective

This randomized controlled clinical study was to assess and compare the efficacy and safety of two chemoradiotherapy regimens [cisplatin + 5-fluorouracil + 3 dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT) and cisplatin + weekly docetaxel + 3DCRT] in patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Methods

A total of seventy-four patients with clinical stages IIB to IIIB esophageal squamous cell carcinoma were enrolled. Chemotherapy for PF group comprised 5-fluorouracil at days 1–5 (250 mg/m²/d) and cisplatin (20 mg/m²) at days 1–3 of every 28-day cycle; full treatment course included 2 cycles. Chemotherapy for DP group comprised docetaxel (20 mg/m²) and cisplatin (20 mg/m²) at days 1, 8, 15, 22, 29, and 36. Both groups treated with concurrent 60 Gy 3DCRT at 200 cGy/d.

Results

Seventy-four patients were enrolled and 71 completed the planned treatment, with a follow-up rate of 95.94%. Short-term curative effect was not statistically significant between the two groups (P = 0.471). The 2-year survival rates were 65.7% and 61.1%, respectively (P = 0.806), 5 years survival rates were 34.29% and 27.78%, respectively (P = 0.221), and there was no significant difference by Fisher test (P = 0.734). As common side effects, incidence rates of radioactive esophagitis and hematological toxicity were lower in DP group.

Conclusion

For locally advanced esophageal cancer patients, current chemoradiotherapy with chemotherapy regimen of weekly docetaxel plus cisplatin has equal curative effect with 5-fluorouracil plus cisplatin, but well-tolerated by reducing side effects such as radioactive esophagitis and bone marrow suppression.     

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy with docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil for esophageal cancer

Purpose

We aimed to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of combination preoperative chemoradiotherapy as first-line treatment in patients with advanced esophageal cancer.

Methods

We performed a phase I dose-escalation trial of docetaxel at 25–40?mg/m² in four planned dose levels in 3–6 patient cohorts on days 1, 15, 29, and 43 administered in combination with cisplatin (70?mg/m² on days 1 and 29) and 5-fluorouracil (70?mg/m²/day on days 1–4 and 29–32) and concurrent radiation therapy (40?Gy). The tumors were resected during weeks 10–13.

Results

This study included 7 patients with esophageal cancer. The dose-limiting toxicity was observed at a biweekly docetaxel dose of 30?mg/m² when patients developed grade 3 febrile neutropenia, grade 4 thrombocytopenia, and grade 4 pain/esophagus, resulting in a maximum tolerated dose of 25?mg/m². Grade 3/4 hematological toxicity was observed in 71% of the patients and grade 3/4 non-hematological toxicity in 57%. The overall tumor response rate was 86% (complete, 57% and partial, 29%). All patients underwent surgery, and there were no deaths as a result of postoperative complications.

Conclusions

This preoperative chemoradiotherapy regimen using triplets is feasible but results in moderate toxicity. It is noteworthy that this regimen was associated with a high rate of pathological complete remission.     

Randomized controlled phase II comparison study of concurrent chemoradiotherapy with docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil versus CCRT with cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil, methotrexate and leucovorin in patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck

We compared concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) with docetaxel, cisplatin (CDDP), and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) (TPF) with CCRT with CDDP, 5-FU, methotrexate and leucovorin (PFML) in patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) in terms of safety and efficacy on survival. A total of 100 patients were enrolled. The TPF group received CCRT with the TPF regimen [docetaxel (50 mg/m²: day 1), CDDP (60 mg/m²: day 4), and continuous 5-FU infusion (600 mg/m²/day: days 1–5)]. In the PFML group, patients received CCRT with the PFML regimen [CDDP (60 mg/m²: day 4)], continuous 5-FU infusion (600 mg/m²/day: days 1–5), methotrexate (30 mg/m²: day 1) and leucovorin (20 mg/m²/day: days 1–5)]. Both groups received 2 cycles of chemotherapy during definitive radiotherapy. The total radiation dose was between 66.6 and 70.2 Gray. The overall response rates after CCRT were 98 with 90% of a pathologically complete response (pCR) in the TPF group and 94 with 77% in the PFML group. For grade 3/4 adverse events, mucositis was more frequent in the PMFL group, and the TPF group showed a higher incidence of hematological toxicity. CCRT with TPF or PMFL for advanced SCCHN was tolerable and produced excellent survival rates.     

Comparative analysis of the efficacy and safety of chemotherapy with oxaliplatin plus fluorouracil/leucovorin between elderly patients over 65?years and younger patients with advanced gastric cancer

Background

A chemotherapy regimen with oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin is commonly used to treat advanced gastric cancer (AGC). This study was designed to compare the efficacy and the safety of oxaliplatin plus fluorouracil/leucovorin administered biweekly (mFOLFOX6) between elderly patients aged over 65?years and younger counterparts with AGC.

Methods

This analysis included 82 AGC patients (≥65:31, <65:51). Patients with previously untreated chemo-na?ve advanced adenocarcinoma of the stomach received oxaliplatin 85?mg/m², 5-FU bolus 400?mg/m² on day?1 and 5-FU 1,500?mg/m², leucovorin 75?mg/m² 22?h infusion on days?1 and 2 every 2?weeks. The aim of the study was to compare efficacy and safety, including response rate (RR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival, and grade ≥3 adverse events, between patients aged ≥65 years and patients aged <65 years.

Results

Median progression-free survival (PFS) was not significantly different between both groups (≥65: 5.8?months, <65: 5.7?months, respectively, HR 0.77, 95% CI: 0.44–1.16, P?=?0.18). Median overall survival was not significantly different between both groups (≥65: 10.3?months, <65: 9.5?months HR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.50–1.37, P?=?0.46). The rate of grade 3 or 4 neutropenia did not differ with age group (≥65: 51.6%, <65: 43.1%); nor did the rates of neutropenic fever (≥65: 16.1%, <65: 5.9%), and infection without neutropenia (≥65: 3.2%, <65: 3.9%). Rates of grade ≥3 toxicities such as thrombocytopenia, nausea/vomiting, or peripheral neuropathy were not significantly different between the two groups.

Conclusions

mFOLFOX6 maintains its efficacy and safety in elderly patients aged over 65?years in comparison with AGC patients aged <65 years. Its judicious use should be considered regardless of age.