Staging of carcinoma of the uterine cervix and endometrium

Carcinoma of the uterine cervix and endometrium are common gynecologic malignancies. Both carcinomas are staged and managed by means of the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging system. In uterine cervical cancer, the FIGO staging system is determined preoperatively by limited conventional procedures. Although this system is effective for early stage disease, it has inherent inaccuracies in advanced stage diseases and does not address nodal involvement. CT and MR imaging are widely used as comprehensive imaging modalities to evaluate tumor size and extent, and nodal involvement. MR imaging is an excellent modality for depicting invasive cervical carcinoma and can provide objective measurement of tumor volume, and provides high negative predictive value for parametrial invasion and stage IVA disease. In contrast, endometrial cancer is surgically staged. Beside recognition of the important prognostic factors, including histologic subtype and grade, accurate assessment of the tumor extent on preoperative MR imaging is expected to greatly optimize surgical procedure and therapeutic strategy. Contrast-enhanced MR imaging can offer “one stop” examination for evaluating the depth of myometrial invasion cervical invasion and nodal metastases. Evaluation of myometrial invasion on MR imaging may be an alternative to gross inspection of the uterus during the surgery.     

Invasive carcinoma of the cervix uteri (stage IB-IIB): evaluation using magnetic resonance

In patients with cervical carcinoma the selection of the optimal therapy depends on the precise preoperative assessment of the extent of disease. Currently, decisions regarding the management of these patients are made on the basis of clinical (FIGO) staging that has 50% mean error rate. To investigate the value of MR imaging in staging patients with invasive cervical cancer, we performed 25 MR examinations on 23 patients with histologic diagnosis of cervical cancer. All patients were clinically considered as having stage IB or IIB disease and underwent radical hysterectomy, providing specimens for pathologic correlation. The overall accuracy of MR imaging in staging cervical carcinoma (stage IB-IIB) was 78.1%. MR imaging seems to be the most reliable preoperative modality for staging invasive cervical cancer.     

Radiologic staging in patients with endometrial cancer: a meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: To apply a meta-analysis to compare the utility of computed tomography (CT), ultrasonography (US), and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in staging endometrial cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data were obtained from a MEDLINE literature search and from manual reviews of article bibliographies. Articles were selected that included results in patients with proved endometrial cancer and imaging-histopathologic correlation and that presented data that allowed calculation of contingency tables. Data for the imaging evaluation of myometrial and cervical invasion were abstracted independently by two authors. Data on year of publication, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage distribution, and methodologic quality were also collected. A subgroup analysis was performed to compare contrast medium-enhanced MR imaging with nonenhanced MR imaging, US, and CT. RESULTS: Six studies met the inclusion criteria for CT; 16, for US; and 25, for MR imaging. Summary receiver operating characteristic analysis showed no significant differences in the overall performance of CT, US, and MR imaging. In the assessment of myometrial invasion, however, contrast-enhanced MR imaging performed significantly better than did nonenhanced MR imaging or US (P < .002) and demonstrated a trend toward better results, as compared with CT. The lack of data on the assessment of cervical invasion at CT or US prevented meta-analytic comparison with data obtained at MR imaging. Results were not influenced by year of publication, FIGO stage distribution, or methodologic quality. CONCLUSION: Although US, CT, or MR imaging can be used in the pretreatment evaluation of endometrial cancer, contrast-enhanced MR imaging offers "one-stop" examination with the highest efficacy.     

MR imaging of cervical carcinoma: a practical staging approach.

Cervical carcinoma is the third most common gynecologic malignancy and is typically seen in younger women, often with serious consequences. The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging system provides worldwide epidemiologic and treatment response statistics. However, there are significant inaccuracies in the FIGO staging system, and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, although not included in that system, is now widely accepted as optimal for evaluation of important prognostic factors such as lesion volume and metastatic lymph node involvement that will help determine the treatment strategy. MR imaging examination obviates the use of invasive procedures such as cystoscopy and proctoscopy, especially when there is no evidence of local extension. Brachytherapy and external beam therapy are optimized with MR imaging evaluation of the shape and direction of lesion growth. In general, T2-weighted MR imaging more clearly delineates cervical carcinoma and is preferred for evaluation of the lymph nodes. Dynamic gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted imaging may help identify smaller tumors, detect or confirm invasion of adjacent organs, and identify fistulous tracts. MR imaging staging, when available, is invaluable for identifying important prognostic factors and optimizing treatment strategies.     

MR staging of clinical stage I and IIa cervical carcinoma: a reappraisal of efficacy and pitfalls

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy and pitfalls of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in preoperative staging of cervical cancer. MR imaging was performed to determine the tumor staging for 31 patients with cervical carcinoma emphasizing tumor size, parametrial invasion, vaginal invasion and lymph node metastases. Tumor size was 3.23+/-1.75 cm (mean+/-standard deviation) at MR imaging compared with 2.79+/-1.76 cm at surgical-pathologic evaluation. The discrepancy between the tumor size determined by MR imaging and the measured surgical specimens was consistent in tumors larger than 1 cm. In assessing parametrial invasion, vaginal invasion and lymph node metastases, MR imaging had an accuracy of 96.7 and 87%. In determining stage of disease and differentiating operable (< or =stage IIA) from advanced disease (> or =stage IIB), MR imaging had an accuracy of 83.8 and 96.7%. Pitfalls leading to staging errors included difficulties in differentiating cancer foci from surrounding tissue edema and excluding vaginal invasion in the presence of large cervical cancer. In conclusion, MR imaging is accurate in the evaluation of parametrial invasion and useful in the differentiation of operable from advanced disease. The ability of MR imaging to exclude vaginal invasion in the presence of large cervical cancer and differentiate cancer foci from surrounding tissue edema is not as reliable.     

Role of magnetic resonance imaging as an adjunct to clinical staging in cervical carcinoma

Magnetic resonance imaging depicts the morphological details of the female pelvis and is useful for evaluating both benign and malignant cervical masses. Clinical assessment of the extent of cervical cancer is crucial in determining the optimal treatment strategy, but clinical staging by itself has limitations. Clinical staging, as defined by FIGO (International Federation of Gynecologic Oncology), is based on the findings of physical examination, lesion biopsies, chest radiography, cystoscopy, and renal sonography and can be erroneous, depending on the stage of the disease, by 16% to 65%. The prognosis of cervical cancer is determined not only by stage, but also by nodal status, tumor volume, and depth of invasion, none of which are included in the FIGO guidelines. Magnetic resonance imaging has been described as the most accurate, noninvasive imaging modality in staging cervical carcinoma. This review outlines the magnetic resonance features of normal cervix, primary disease (by stage), and recurrent disease and discusses the role of magnetic resonance imaging in staging and clinical decision making.     

Invited. Cervical cancer

The stage estimated by clinical FIGO staging is the main determinant in guiding the treatment decisions. However, clinical FIGO staging does have inherent inaccuracies, because it does not include significant prognostic factors. Presently, MRI is not officially incorporated in the staging workup system; however, it is widely accepted as the most reliable imaging modality in evaluating cervical cancer and in treatment planning. MRI offers direct tumor visualization, accurate assessment of the depth of stromal invasion and tumor volume, lymph node evaluation, and reliable staging accuracy. Published reports show the superiority of MRI over clinical staging, and several recent works on dynamic MRI suggest further improvement of MRI in evaluating cervical cancer.     

Preoperative staging of cervical carcinoma with MR imaging: a reappraisal of diagnostic accuracy and pitfalls

The purpose of this study was to assess the diagnostic accuracy and pitfalls of MR imaging in preoperative staging of cervical cancer. Magnetic resonance imaging was performed to determine the tumor staging for 41 patients with cervical carcinoma emphasizing tumor size, parametrial invasion, vaginal invasion, and lymph node metastases. According to the correlation of MR findings with surgical-pathological features, there was less than 5 mm discrepancy in the size in 29 of 34 tumors (85.3%) that were larger than 1 cm. In assessing parametrial invasion, vaginal invasion and lymph node metastases, MR imaging had an accuracy of 95, 83, and 86%, respectively. In determining stage of disease and differentiating operable (< or =stage IIA) from advanced disease (> or =stage IIB), MR imaging had an accuracy of 82.9 and 93%. Pitfalls leading to staging errors included difficulties in differentiating cancer foci from surrounding tissue edema and detecting microscopic tumor extension. Magnetic resonance imaging is accurate in the evaluation of parametrial invasion and differentiation of operable from advanced disease. The ability of MR imaging to detect microscopic extra-cervical tumor extension and differentiate cancer foci from surrounding tissue edema is not as reliable.     

The correlation of preoperative CT,MR imaging,and clinical staging (FIGO) with histopathology findings in primary cervical carcinoma

The aim of this study was to compare the preoperative findings of abdominal/pelvic CT and MRI with the preoperative clinical International Federation of Obstetrics and Gynecology (FIGO) staging and postoperative pathology report in patients with primary cancer of the cervix. Thirty-six patients with surgical–pathological proven primary cancer of the cervix were retrospectively studied for preoperative staging by clinical examination, CT, and MR imaging. Studied parameters for preoperative staging were the presence of tumor, tumor extension into the parametrial tissue, pelvic wall, adjacent organs, and lymph nodes. The CT was performed in 32 patients and MRI (T1- and T2-weighted images) in 29 patients. The CT and MR staging were based on the FIGO staging system. Results were compared with histological findings. The group is consisted of stage 0 (in situ):1, Ia:1, Ib:8, IIa:2, IIb:12, IIIa:4, IVa:6, and IVb:2 patients. The overall accuracy of staging for clinical examination, CT, and MRI was 47, 53, and 86%, respectively. The MRI incorrectly staged 2 patients and did not visualize only two tumors; one was an in situ (stage-0) and one stage-Ia (microscopic) disease. The MRI is more accurate than CT and they are both superior to clinical examination in evaluating the locoregional extension and preoperative staging of primary cancer of the cervix.     

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Pretreatment Planning of Invasive Cancer of the Cervix

The prognosis of cervical cancer is linked to lymph node involvement, and this is predicted clinically and pathologically by the stage of the disease, as well as the volume and grade of the tumor. Staging of cervical cancer based on International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging uses physical examination, cystoscopy, proctoscopy, intravenous urography, and barium enema. It does not include CT or MRI. Evaluation of the parametrium is limited in FIGO staging, and lymph node metastasis, an important prognostic factor, is not included in FIGO staging. The most important role for imaging is to distinguish stages Ia, Ib, and IIa disease treated with surgery from advanced disease treated with radiation therapy with or without chemotherapy. This article reviews the current role of imaging in pretreatment planning of invasive cervical cancer. The ACR Appropriateness Criteria(?) are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed every 2 years by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and review include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer-reviewed journals and the application of a well-established consensus methodology (modified Delphi) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures by the panel. In those instances in which evidence is lacking or not definitive, expert opinion may be used to recommend imaging or treatment.     

MR imaging of the breast

The results of clinical investigation suggest that MR imaging can provide clinically important information that cannot be obtained with conventional imaging methods, and that this modality will, in the future, be an invaluable adjunctive breast imaging tool just as breast ultrasound is today. MR imaging appears to be the most accurate method for the detection of implant failure, and although it is the most costly of the available implant imaging techniques, it may be the study of choice when there is a question of implant integrity that cannot be answered with conventional methods. MR imaging as a method to detect, diagnose, and stage breast cancer remains in the investigational stage. The specificity of MR imaging appears limited because of the overlap in the enhancement kinetics and morphologic appearance of benign and malignant lesions. In selected cases, the identification of certain morphologic features, such as internal septations or the absence of enhancement, may be used to classify a lesion as benign, offering an alternative to percutaneous or excisional biopsy. MR imaging appears to be very sensitive for the visualization of both invasive carcinoma and DCIS. Perhaps most important, MR imaging can detect invasive and noninvasive breast carcinoma that is both mammographically and clinically occult, offering the potential for more accurate breast cancer staging and optimized treatment planning. MR imaging is emerging as perhaps the most promising imaging modality for breast cancer detection to date. Published results, however, are from studies with relatively small numbers of patients. The results of these studies should be validated in a large-scale clinical trial before MR imaging is implemented clinically, outside of research settings. This type of clinical investigation is needed to define the technical requirements for optimal imaging, to define interpretation criteria, to develop accurate MR imaging guided localization and biopsy systems, to define the clinical indications for which MR imaging should be used as an adjunct to conventional imaging methods, and to address the issue of cost-effectiveness. One such trial, an international, multi-institutional study funded by the National Cancer Institute, is presently underway.     

Comparison of transrectal sonography and double-contrast MR imaging when staging rectal cancer

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was the prospective comparison of the diagnostic yield of transrectal sonography and double-contrast MR imaging for preoperative staging of rectal cancer. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Thirty-nine rectal cancer patients (20 men, 19 women) underwent transrectal sonography performed with a 10-MHz endoanal probe and MR imaging (1.0 T or 1.5 T) using a whole-body coil. After rectal application of a superparamagnetic iron oxide MR contrast agent, T1- and T2-weighted images and gadolinium-enhanced double-contrast images were obtained. The results of examinations were compared with the histology of resected specimens. RESULTS: Histopathology showed four stage T1, 11 stage T2, 18 stage T3, and six stage T4 tumors using the TNM staging system. Nodal metastases were seen in 16 patients. Transrectal sonography could not be performed in 11 patients because of the high location of the tumor. In the remaining 28 patients, the accuracy of transrectal sonography for T stage was 64% overall (patients not receiving radiation, 69%; patients receiving radiation, 60%) and 70% for N stage. In 39 patients, double-contrast MR imaging correctly identified the T stage with an accuracy of 64% overall (patients not receiving radiation, 75%; patients receiving radiation, 53%) and the N stage with an accuracy of 62%. The assessment of rectal wall penetration (Dukes' classification A versus B) revealed a sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 93%, 71%, and 82%, respectively, for transrectal sonography and 100%, 60%, and 85% for MR imaging. CONCLUSION: If it is technically feasible, transrectal sonography is an accurate method for staging rectal cancer. In proximal or stenotic tumors, double-contrast MR imaging is the method of choice. Diagnostic accuracy of transrectal sonography and MR imaging is high for predicting bowel wall penetration.     

Staging of malignant pleural mesothelioma: comparison of CT and MR imaging

OBJECTIVE: This article compares the accuracy of CT with that of MR imaging in staging of malignant pleural mesothelioma. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Ninety-five patients were enrolled in a prospective staging protocol based on the International Mesothelioma Interest Group staging system. Sixty-five patients underwent CT and MR imaging and a surgical procedure (excluding percutaneous needle biopsy) to stage and resect the tumor. Receiver operating characteristic analyses were performed. CT and MR scans were interpreted independently by observers who were unaware of the results of the other imaging study; these imaging findings were compared with the results of surgery and pathologic examination. RESULTS: The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves for eight of 10 features revealed by imaging showed no statistically significant differences between CT and MR imaging. However, MR imaging was superior to CT in revealing invasion of the diaphragm (A(z) = .55 for CT versus .82 for MR imaging) and in revealing invasion of endothoracic fascia or solitary resectable foci of chest wall invasion (A(z) = .46 for CT; A(z) = .69 for MR imaging). Several anatomic regions could not be evaluated because positive findings at surgery were rare. CONCLUSION: CT and MR imaging are of nearly equivalent diagnostic accuracy in staging malignant pleural mesothelioma. MR imaging is superior to CT in revealing solitary foci of chest wall invasion and endothoracic fascia involvement and in showing diaphragmatic muscle invasion; however, this advantage does not affect surgical treatment. For cost reasons, CT should be considered the standard diagnostic study before therapy.     

Magnetic resonance in the evaluation of parametrial involvement in carcinoma of the cervix uteri]

Cervical carcinoma is one of the most frequent gynecologic malignancies. Its prognosis depends on both tumor volume at diagnosis and its stage. Staging accuracy is important not only for prognosis but also for optimal treatment planning. According to FIGO criteria, carcinomas without parametrial involvement (stage I and limited stage IIA disease) can be surgically treated. For more advanced stages, treatment, in most cases, consists of radiation therapy or chemotherapy alone. The authors evaluated MR accuracy in the diagnosis of parametrial involvement; to this purpose, 32 patients with histologically proven lesions were referred for MR imaging, which was performed with a 0.5 T superconductive magnet. Transverse and sagittal SE images were obtained with T2 weighting (TR 1800 ms, TE 30-100 ms); transverse and sometimes sagittal images were obtained with T1 weighting (TR 450/300 ms, TE 20/30). T1-weighted images distinguished neoplasm from cervical stroma or dense parametrial connective tissue in 40% of cases only. T2-weighted images, instead, demonstrated the difference in all cases, showing tumor as a hyperintense area in 90% of patients. Neoplastic involvement of pericervical connective tissue was diagnosed, with those sequences, on the basis of focal disruptions of the outer hypointense fibrous cervical stroma; findings were correlated with those from a previous clinical staging and in 26/32 patients with pathologic findings. MR accuracy in demonstrating parametrial involvement was 88%, sensitivity was 77% and specificity was 94%. Clinical staging accuracy in the evaluation of this parameter was 66%. In 6 cases with no surgical findings, MR confirmed extensive parametrial and vesical or rectal neoplastic involvement, as diagnosed at clinics. MR imaging, thanks to its multiplanar and multiparametric imaging capabilities is a very reliable technique in the preoperative staging of cervical carcinoma. Moreover, since clinical staging can sometimes underestimate pericervical connective spread, the higher accuracy of MR imaging can help avoid useless interventional procedures.     

3.0T MR高分辨率成像对直肠癌局部浸润的术前影像学评价

目的 探讨3.0T MR高分辨率成像在直肠癌术前局部浸润的评估价值.方法 回顾性分析经手术病理证实的直肠癌患者168例,术前均行MRI常规盆腔、直肠高分辨成像.评价3.0T MR高分辨成像术前T分期的准确性;探讨T3期直肠癌局部浸润特征性影像学表现.结果 直肠癌累及肠周径程度与病理T分期呈中等正相关(rs=0.530, P=0.003).MRI直肠癌T分期与病理T分期比较,总体诊断准确度为84.52%,各分期MRI征象与病理T分期有较强的相关性(rs=0.837,P=0.001).MRI诊断T3期直肠癌中,各单一征象以肿瘤结节样外凸特异性最高(91.1%),肌层信号中断灵敏度最好(89.7%).而各叠加征象中则以肠壁索条影+肌层信号中断特异性最高(89.3%),灵敏度最好(78.0%).结论 3.0T MR高分辨成像能较好显示直肠癌局部浸润表现,对术前T分期有一定的临床应用价值.     

Magnetic resonance imaging in the preoperative assessment of clinical stage I endometrial carcinoma

Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging may aid in preoperative treatment planning of endometrial carcinoma by accurately estimating tumor volume, depth of myometrial invasion, and extrauterine extension. Preoperative MR scans were obtained on 24 women with clinical stage I endometrial cancer. MR scans were evaluated for uterine size, as an indirect measure of tumor volume, and depth of myometrial invasion. MR detected deep invasion (greater than or equal to 50% of myometrial thickness) with a sensitivity of 71% and specificity of 83% (accuracy 79%) when compared with the pathologic findings. MR staging may assist in deciding which patients should have lymph node dissection at surgery and may aid in decisions regarding adjunctive radiation therapy.     

Gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging, T2-weighted MR imaging, and transurethral ultrasonography

PURPOSE: To assess the value and problems of dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging, T2-weighted MR imaging, and transurethral ultrasonography(TUUS) in staging of urinary bladder cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging and FSE T2-weighted MR imaging of 64 patients with urinary bladder cancer who subsequently had surgery were retrospectively reviewed and compared with TUUS findings. RESULTS: Specificity for muscular invasion was 90.5% with TUUS, significantly better than with dynamic MR imaging (64.9%) (p < 0.05). The rates of overestimation of superficial cancer(pT1) with dynamic MRI and T2-weighted MR imaging were 35.1%(13/37) and 24.3%(9/37), respectively. The staging accuracy of invasive cancer(pT2 or over) was 85.2% with dynamic MR imaging, which was better than the rate of 75.0% achieved with T2-weighted MR imaging. CONCLUSION: Although TUUS was a better modality for diagnosing superficial cancer(pT1), dynamic MR imaging was found to be better for diagnosing invasive(pT2 or over) cancer.     

Esophageal cancer staging with endoscopic MR imaging: pilot study

The authors defined esophageal anatomy and evaluated esophageal cancer staging in a pilot group by comparing endoscopic magnetic resonance (MR) imaging results with pathologic and endoscopic ultrasonographic (US) results when available. A porcine esophagus, one volunteer, and 23 patients suspected of having esophageal cancer were imaged at 0.5 T. MR imaging was successful in 21 patients. Eight of these patients underwent esophagectomy (one after chemotherapy, which invalidated comparison with MR imaging; another did not undergo lymphadenectomy) and one underwent laparoscopy and nodal staging only; eight underwent US. When verified with pathologic staging, endoscopic MR imaging was accurate in six of seven patients (T stage) and five of six patients (N stage; nodal areas too obscured by artifact for comparison in one case). MR imaging and US results concurred in seven of eight (T stage) and five of eight (N stage) patients. No complications were observed. Endoscopic MR imaging is safe and probably comparable to endoscopic US, but with a tendency to overstage the disease.     

Preoperative 3T MR imaging of rectal cancer: local staging accuracy using a two-dimensional and three-dimensional T2-weighted turbo spin echo sequence

PURPOSE: The purpose of our study was to evaluate the image quality and diagnostic performance of two-dimensional (D) turbo spin echo (TSE) and 3D T2-weighted TSE MR imaging in local staging of rectal cancer at 3T. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 3T phased-array MR imaging was performed in 36 consecutive patients with biopsy-proven rectal cancer. High-resolution 2D TSE images in three planes and 3D TSE images of the rectum were obtained. Two independent observers performed an image quality assessment using eight image quality characteristics. All 2D and 3D datasets were evaluated separately. MR images were prospectively evaluated by two experienced radiologists in consensus with regard to local disease. Total mesorectal excision was used as the standard of reference. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value, and overall accuracy were calculated. Areas under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) were determined. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients who underwent a total mesorectal excision were enrolled in this study. Significantly more motion artifacts were present with 3D TSE imaging (P=0.04). The overall sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of muscularis propria invasion in rectal cancer using 2D T2-weighted images were 100%, 66%, and 95%, respectively. There was a statistical significant greater AUC using 2D T2-weighted images compared to 3D T2-weighted MR images (P=0.04). The ROC curves describing the results of the interpretation of 2D and 3D T2-weighted datasets regarding perirectal tissue invasion showed no statistical significant difference (P=0.41). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, high local staging accuracies with 3T 2D T2-weighted MR imaging were demonstrated. 3D T2-weighted MR imaging cannot replace 2D MR imaging for local staging of rectal cancer. However, 3D MR imaging can be used for visualization of the complex pelvic anatomy for treatment planning purposes.