Prevalence of Barrett's esophagus in individuals without typical symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease

BACKGROUND: Barretts esophagus, the major risk factor for esophageal adenocarcinoma, is detected in approximately 10%-14% of individuals submitted to upper endoscopy for the assessment of gastroesophageal reflux disease related symptoms. Prevalence studies of Barretts esophagus in individuals without typical symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease have reported rates ranging from 0.6% to 25%. AIM: To determine the prevalence of Barretts in a Brazilian population older than 50 years without typical symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease. METHODS: A total of 104 patients (51 men), mean age of 65 years, with an indication for upper endoscopy but without symptoms of heartburn and/or acid regurgitation (determined with a validated questionnaire) were recruited. Subjects submitted to upper endoscopic examination in the last 10 years or using antisecretory medication (proton pump inhibitors) during the last 6 months were not included. Methylene blue chromoscopy was performed during the endoscopic exam to facilitate identification of the metaplastic epithelium. RESULTS: Barretts esophagus was diagnosed endoscopically and confirmed by histology in four patients, all of them males. The metaplastic segment was short (less than 3 cm) and free of dysplasia in all patients. The prevalence of Barretts esophagus was 7.75% in the male population and 3.8% in the general population studied. CONCLUSION: Due to the low prevalence of Barretts esophagus found in the present study, associated with the finding of short-segment Barretts esophagus in all cases diagnosed and the absence of dysplasia in the material analyzed, endoscopic screening for Barretts esophagus in patients above the age of 50 without the classical symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease is not indicated for the Brazilian population.     

Barrett's esophagus in Latinos undergoing endoscopy for gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms

Previous studies comparing the prevalence of Barrett's esophagus in Latinos and non‐Latino whites are inconsistent. The aim of the study is to compare the prevalence of Barrett's esophagus in Latinos and non‐Latino whites and to determine risk factors associated with Barrett's esophagus. Between March 2005 and January 2009, consecutive Latino and non‐Latino white patients who underwent endoscopy for primary indication for symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease were identified by examining the internal endoscopy database at Los Angeles County + USC Medical Center. Barrett's esophagus was defined by columnar‐lined distal esophagus on endoscopy confirmed by intestinal metaplasia on histology. Clinical features and endoscopic findings were retrospectively reviewed. The mean age of the 663 patients was 50 ± 12 years, 30% were male, and 92% were Latino. Compared with non‐Latino whites, Latinos had more females (72% vs. 46%; P = 0.0001) and more Helicobacter pylori infection (53% vs. 24%; P = 0.003) but less tobacco use (7% vs. 17%; P = 0.01). Overall, 10% (68/663) of all patients had Barrett's esophagus whereas the prevalence was 10% (62/611) among the Latinos and 12% (6/52) among the non‐Latino whites (OR 0.9, 95% CI 0.4–2.1; P = 0.75). One patient in the Latino group had high‐grade dysplasia. On multivariate analysis, male gender (AOR 2.3, 95% CI 1.4–4.1; P = 0.002), diabetes (AOR 2.2, 95% CI 1.1–4.5; P = 0.03), and age ≥55 years (AOR 2.2, 95% CI 1.3–3.8; P = 0.006) were independently associated with Barrett's esophagus; Latino ethnicity remained nonsignificant (AOR 1.1, 95% CI 0.4–2.7; P = 0.88). In Latinos undergoing endoscopy for gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms, the prevalence of Barrett's esophagus was 10%, comparable with non‐Latino white controls as well as the prevalence previously reported among Caucasians. In addition to established risk factors, diabetes was associated with Barrett's esophagus.     

Risk factors for Barrett's esophagus in Indian patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease

Background and Aims: Barrett's esophagus (BE) is reported to be infrequent in Asians, with no data from India regarding its prevalence and risk factors. We investigated the frequency and risk factors of columnar mucosa with or without specialized intestinal metaplasia (SIM) in Indian patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Methods: A total of 278 GERD patients over 2 years underwent gastroscopy and completed a questionnaire for possible BE risk factors. Patients with columnar mucosa on endoscopy underwent four‐quadrant biopsy; BE was histologically defined as columnar mucosa with or without SIM. Patients without columnar mucosa at endoscopy were considered as controls and compared to patients with BE and those with SIM. Results: Forty‐six patients with GERD had columnar mucosa on histology (16.54%); 25 (8.99%) of these had SIM. The risk factors for BE were the presence of hiatus hernia (odds ratio [OR]: 3.14; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.2–8.17) and a history of eructation (OR: 2.28; CI: 1.11–4.66). The risk factors for SIM were age ≥ 45 years (OR: 2.63; CI: 1.03–6.71), hiatus hernia (OR: 3.95; CI: 1.24–12.56), and a history of eructation (OR: 3.41; CI: 1.19–9.78). Sex, severity of symptoms, dietary factors, tobacco or alcohol use, and body mass index were not associated with BE. The median circumferential segment length was 2 (1–10) cm, and the maximal length was 3 (2–11) cm in both groups. Conclusion: BE is not an uncommon finding among Indian GERD patients. Age ≥ 45 years, history of eructation, and the presence of hiatus hernia are associated with SIM.     

Tongue-like Barrett＇s esophagus is associated with gastroesophageal reflux disease

AIM： To test this hypothesis of barrett esophagus （BE） classified into two types and to further determine if there was any correlation between the shape of endoscopically suspected esophageal metaplasia （ESEM）, prevalence of reflux esophagitis （RE） and heartburn. METHODS： A total of 6504 Japanese who underwent endoscopy for their annual stomach check-up were enrolled in this study. BE was detected without histological confirmation that is ESEM. We originally classified cases of ESEM into 3 types based on its shape： Tongue-like （T type）, Dome-like （D type） and Wave-like （W type） ESEM. The respective subjects were prospectively asked to complete questionnaires concerning the symptoms of heartburn, dysphagia, and abdominal pain for a one-month period. RESULTS： ESEM was observed in 10.3% of 6504 subjects （ESEM 〈 1 cm, 9.4%; 1cm≤ESEM 〈 3 cm, 1.7%; ESEM≥3 cm, 0.5%）. The frequency of ESEM was significantly higher in males compared with female subjects. Statistical analysis showed that the prevalence of heartburn and RE were significantly higher in the T type ESEM than in the W type ESEM （P 〈 0.05）. CONCLUSION： The T type ESEM was strongly associated with reflux symptoms and RE whereas the W type ESEM was not associated with GERD.     

The role of obesity in gastroesophageal reflux disease and Barrett's esophagus

The prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and related disorders has been increasing worldwide, particularly in Western populations where a parallel rise in obesity prevalence has been reported. As weight gain often overlaps with the GERD-related symptoms, several recent studies investigated the significance of this correlation, mainly using meta-analyses. Here, we discuss the large amount of evidence linking obesity and GERD-related symptoms, providing potential mechanisms for their co-occurrence. Particular attention is given also to the association between obesity, Barrett's esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma development.     

Effects of coexisting upper gastrointestinal symptoms on daily life and quality of life in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms

Esophagus - Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common disease encountered in daily medical care and clinical problem which hampers daily life and reduces quality of life (QOL). The...     

Use of a simple symptom questionnaire to predict Barrett's esophagus in patients with symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux

OBJECTIVE: Accurately predicting Barrett's esophagus (BE) in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is difficult. Using logistic regression analysis of symptom questionnaire scores we created a model to predict the presence of BE. METHODS: We conducted a logistic regression analysis of symptom data collected prospectively on 517 GERD patients and created a prediction model based on patient gender, age, ethnicity, and symptom severity. RESULTS: There were 337 (65%) males and 180 (35%) females, of whom 99 (19%) had Barrett's esophagus (BE). Multiple logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the predictive ability of gender, age, and ethnicity along with symptoms of heartburn, nocturnal pain, odynophagia, presence of belching, dysphagia, relief of symptoms with food, and nausea. The only significant predictors (at the 0.05 level) were male gender, heartburn, nocturnal pain, and odynophagia (all with positive effects on the presence of BE) and dysphagia (which had a negative effect). A nomogram was produced to show the effect of a given predictor on the probability of having BE in the context of the effects of the other predictors, and to estimate the probability of having BE for a given individual. The mean score (+/-SD) for the BE patients in our sample was 397.4+/-46.2 with a range of 292-530. For the patients without BE, the mean score (+/-SD) was 351.3+/-60.3 with a range of 190 - 528 (p < 0.001). If screening for BE is performed at a score of 375 or more, our model would have a specificity of 63% with a sensitivity of 77% (95% CI 61-86% given the 63% specificity). CONCLUSIONS: By asking seven questions about symptom severity, clinicians may be able to assign a probability to the presence of BE, and thus, determine the need for endoscopy in GERD patients.     

Barrett＇s esophagus and its correlation with gastroesophageal reflux in Chinese

AIM- To study the prevalence of Barrett‘s esophagus in Chinese and its correlation with gastroesophageal reflux. METHODS: This study was carded out in a large prospective series of 391 patients who had undergone upper endoscopy. The patients were divided into 3 groups according to the position of squamocolumnar junction (SC3). Reflux esophagitis (RE) and its degree were recorded. Intestinal metaplasia (IM) in biopsy specimen was typed according to histochemistry and HE and alcian blue (pH2.5) staining separately. Results correlating with clinical, endoscopic, and pathological data were analysed. RESULTS: The prevalence of IM endoscopically appearing Long-segment Barrett‘s Esophagus (LSBE) was 26.53%, Short-segment Barrett‘s Esophagus (SSBE) was 33.85% and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) was 34.00%. IM increased with age of above 40 years old and no difference was found between male and female. Twelve were diagnosed as dysplasia (7 low -grade, 5 high-grade), 16 were diagnosed as cardiac adenocarcinoma and 1 as esophageal adenocarcinoma. The more far away the SCJ moved upward above GEJ, the higher the prevalence and the more severe the RE were. CONCLUSION: There was no difference of the prevalence of IM in different places of SCJ, and IM increased with age of above 40 years old. It is important to pay attention to dysplasia in the distal esophagus and gastro-esophageal junction, and adenocarcinoma is more common in cardia than in esophagus. BE is a consequence of gastroesophageal reflux disease.     

Familial gastroesophageal reflux and development of Barrett's esophagus

The family of an elderly man with Barrett's esophagus was examined for gastroesophageal reflux and development of Barrett's esophagus. All five living children have gastroesophageal reflux or esophagitis, or both, and three have unequivocal Barrett's esophagus. Two third-generation descendents have gastroesophageal reflux. This pattern suggests autosomal dominant transmission of the gastroesophageal reflux trait. The family also has a high prevalence of cancer, which may represent the cancer family syndrome.     

Recent developments in gastroesophageal reflux disease and Barrett's esophagus: ANNO 2012

The incidence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and esophageal columnar metaplasia is rising worldwide. Both mechanical and functional factors perturb the double sphincter barrier at the esophagogastric junction (EGJ). Discovery of the acid pocket is fundamental in understanding postprandial acid reflux. Adding impedencemetry to pH measurements allows detection of non-acid or weakly acidic reflux. Histologic and endoscopic injury of the squamous mucosa rises from dilation of the intercellular spaces, papillary extension, accentuated intrapapillary looping, red streaks, erosive tissue loss, etc., graded with the Los Angeles system. Seventy percent of patients have no recognizable abnormalities (non-erosive or neGERD). Treatment of GERD mainly relates to the control of acid secretion but a revival of alginate/antacid obliterating the acid pocket is to be expected. Weaker heartburn control in neGERD is a misnomer because most studies included patients with no evidence of reflux disease. Traditional (delayed-release) proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are powerful suppressors of acid secretion but do have limitations such as gradual build up of acid control, weak control of nocturnal acid recovery, possibility of rebound, occasional need for dose escalation, etc. Barrett's esophagus (BE) is endoscopically diagnosed also in the absence of intestinal metaplasia. A prerequisite is the precise location of the EGJ (proximal end of gastric folds, esophageal sphincter pinch, distal extent of palisade vessels). BE is graded with the Prague C & M system. Barrett's cancer develops usually via low-grade and high-grade dysplasia. Endoscopic examination may indicate suspicious areas, amenable for targeted biopsy. Otherwise, four quadrant biopsies are obtained when searching for neoplasia. Low-grade dysplasia, especially when it is multifocal and p53 positive, high-grade dysplasia and mucosal cancer should be treated with endoscopic resection of the target area, followed by radiofrequency ablation of the adjacent non-neoplastic columnar mucosa, followed with powerful acid suppressant therapy. The long-term results of the combination of resection and ablation are exiting and at least comparable to surgical resection.     

Laryngopharyngeal reflux in patients with symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease

Laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) has been extensively studied in patients with laryngeal signs and symptoms, gastroesophageal reflux being identified in approximately 50%. Few studies have investigated the incidence and significance of LPR in GERD patients. Two-hundred and seventy-six consecutive patients referred with symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux had dual probe 24 h pH, esophageal manometry, GERD and ENT questionnaires. LPR was defined as at least three pharyngeal reflux events less than pH 5.0 with corresponding esophageal reflux, but excluding meal periods. Fourty-two percent of patients were positive for LPR on 24 h pH monitoring and 91.3% corresponded with an abnormal esophageal acid score. Distal esophageal acid exposure was significantly greater (P < 0.001) in patients with LPR but symptoms of GERD and regurgitation scores showed no significant differences between patients with positive and negative LPR on 24 h pH. There was no significant difference between the incidence of LPR in patients with or without laryngeal symptoms. There is a high incidence of LPR in patients with GERD but its significance for laryngeal symptoms is tenuous. Fixed distance dual probe pH monitoring allows documentation of conventional esophageal reflux and LPR.     

Mortality associated with Barrett's esophagus and gastroesophageal reflux disease diagnoses-a population-based cohort study

INTRODUCTION: Patients with Barrett's esophagus have a much increased risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma but recent evidence suggests no increase in overall mortality. We have reexamined this surprising finding in a large, prospectively population-based cohort study. METHODS: Cohorts of patients having Barrett's esophagus (n=1,677), esophagitis (n=6,392), simple reflux (n=6,328), and a standard reference cohort representing the general population in the United Kingdom (n=13,416) were selected from General Practice Research Database. The last three cohorts were matched to the Barrett's cohort by general practice, age, and sex. Mortality rates and hazard ratios with their 95% confidence intervals were calculated for deaths due to all causes and deaths due to all causes except esophageal cancer occurring beyond the first year of the follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 1,725 deaths were analyzed including 49 deaths in subjects having esophageal cancer. Of 111 deaths in the Barrett's cohort, 13 (12%) were in subjects with esophageal cancer. Compared with the reference cohort, hazard ratios for all causes of death were 1.37 (1.12-1.66) for the Barrett's, 1.16 (1.02-1.32) for the esophagitis, and 1.16 (1.01-1.33) for the reflux cohorts. The corresponding figures for deaths due to all causes except esophageal cancer were 1.23 (1.00-1.51), 1.13 (0.99-1.30), and 1.15 (1.00-1.31). Of the excess mortality rates in the Barrett's, esophagitis, and reflux cohorts, at the most 45%, 20%, and 13%, respectively, could be attributed to esophageal cancer. CONCLUSION: People with Barrett's esophagus and gastroesophageal reflux disease have higher mortality rates than the general population, and an increase in esophageal cancer risk accounts for less than half the excess mortality in Barrett's.     

Correlation of gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms characteristics with long-segment Barrett''s esophagus

Thus far, there has been a paucity of studies that have assessed the value of the different gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptom characteristics in identifying patients with long-segment Barrett's esophagus versus those with short-segment Barrett's esophagus. To determine if any of the symptom characteristics of GERD correlates with long-segment Barrett's esophagus versus short-segment Barrett's esophagus. Patients seen in our Barrett's clinic were prospectively approached and recruited into the study. All patients underwent an endoscopy, validated GERD symptoms questionnaire and a personal interview. Of the 88 Barrett's esophagus patients enrolled into the study, 47 had short-segment Barrett's esophagus and 41 long-segment Barrett's esophagus. Patients with short-segment Barrett's esophagus reported significantly more daily heartburn symptoms (84.1%) than patients with long-segment Barrett's esophagus (63.2%, P = 0.02). There was a significant difference in reports of severe to very severe dysphagia in patients with long-segment Barrett's esophagus versus those with short-segment Barrett's esophagus (76.9%vs. 38.1%, P = 0.02). Longer duration in years of chest pain was the only symptom characteristic of gastroesophageal reflux disease associated with longer lengths of Barrett's mucosa. Reports of severe or very severe dysphagia were more common in long-segment Barrett's esophagus patients. Only longer duration of chest pain was correlated with longer lengths of Barrett's esophagus.     

Females without reflux symptoms or gastroesophageal reflux disease have less distal esophageal acid exposure than males without reflux symptoms or gastroesophageal reflux disease

Ambulatory 24‐hour esophageal pH monitoring is the gold standard examination to assess esophageal acid exposure. Gender‐related variation is a well‐recognized physiologic phenomenon in health and disease. To date, limited gender‐specific 24‐hour esophageal pH monitoring data are available. The aim of this study was to obtain values of esophageal pH monitoring in males and females without reflux symptoms or gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) to determine if gender variation exists in esophageal acid exposure among individuals without these factors. Twenty‐four‐hour dual esophageal pH monitoring was performed in male and female volunteers without reflux symptoms or GERD. Values for total number of reflux episodes, episodes longer than 5 minutes, total reflux time in minutes, % time with pH below 4, and longest reflux episode in the proximal/distal esophagus were obtained and recorded for both groups. The distal channel was placed 5 cm and proximal channel 15 cm above the manometrically determined lower esophageal sphincter. Means were compared using an independent sample t‐test. Sixty‐seven males and 69 females were enrolled. All subjects completed esophageal 24‐hour pH monitoring without difficulty. There was no age or body mass difference between groups. Females had significantly fewer reflux episodes at both esophageal measuring sites and, significantly less total reflux time and % time with pH below 4 in the distal esophagus than males. All other parameters were similar. Significant gender‐related differences exist in esophageal acid exposure, especially in the distal esophagus in individuals without reflux symptoms or GERD. These differences underscore the need for gender‐specific reference values for 24‐hour pH monitoring, allowing for an accurate evaluation of esophageal acid exposure in symptomatic patients.     

Esophageal diseases: gastroesophageal reflux disease, Barrett's esophagus and eosinophilic esophagitis

Interesting advances are always reported in Digestive Disease Week. This year's studies on gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) stressed the role of weight gain and psychological factors in both symptom production and lack of treatment response. In Barrett's esophagus, radiofrequency ablation has become the treatment of choice in cases associated with dysplasia or neoplasms in situ. Finally, notable studies of eosinophilic esophagitis highlighted the difficulty of distinguishing between this entity and GERD. Topical steroids and exclusion diets are effective therapeutic alternatives.     

Barrett's esophagus. A prevalent, occult complication of gastroesophageal reflux disease

A prospective study of patients with symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux was undertaken to determine the prevalence of Barrett's esophagus and reevaluate the diagnostic approach necessary to detect this complication. Endoscopy with mucosal biopsy was performed in 97 subjects. Twelve (12.4%) were found to have Barrett's esophagus. The sensitivity and specificity of the endoscopic and radiologic examinations for Barrett's esophagus were prospectively evaluated. Endoscopy (92%) was significantly more sensitive than radiology (24%) in detecting Barrett's esophagus (p less than 0.001). The frequency and severity of reflux symptoms among patients determined to have Barrett's esophagus, reflux esophagitis, or normal esophageal biopsies were quantitatively similar in all three groups, except for significantly greater daytime heartburn in those with reflux esophagitis (p less than 0.01). These data indicate that Barrett's esophagus complicates gastroesophageal reflux more often than previously believed.     

Duodenogastric reflux in patients with Barrett's esophagus

The role of duodenogastric reflux in the pathogenesis of gastroesophageal reflux disease is not clear. Using hepatobiliary scanning techniques, we found evidence of duodenogastric reflux in six of 13 patients with Barrett's esophagus. This compares with only two positive studies in 19 control subjects. This difference is statistically significant P=0.038, two-tailed Fisher's exact test). Three of nine patients who had gastroesophageal reflux without Barrett's esophagus had evidence of duodenogastric reflux, a frequency not significantly different from either of the other groups. Gastroesophageal reflux of bile and pancreatic enzymes, in addition to gastric acid may contribute to the greater esophageal damage often seen in Barrett's esophagus. The presence of duodenogastric reflux in these patients may have important pathophysiologic and therapeutic implications.